Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: “We the People” Reconsidered
- Quasi-Rights: Participatory Citizenship and Negative Liberties in Democratic Athens
- Is There a Duty to Vote?
- Postmodern Liberalism and the Expressive Function of Law
- Democratic Epistemology and Accountability
- Political Quality
- Why Deliberative Democracy Is Different
- The Institutions of Deliberative Democracy
- Democracy as a Telos
- Radical Democracy, Personal Freedom, and the Transformative Potential of Politics
- Democracy and Value Pluralism
- The Problem of Russian Democracy: Can Russia Rise Again?
- Index
Quasi-Rights: Participatory Citizenship and Negative Liberties in Democratic Athens
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: “We the People” Reconsidered
- Quasi-Rights: Participatory Citizenship and Negative Liberties in Democratic Athens
- Is There a Duty to Vote?
- Postmodern Liberalism and the Expressive Function of Law
- Democratic Epistemology and Accountability
- Political Quality
- Why Deliberative Democracy Is Different
- The Institutions of Deliberative Democracy
- Democracy as a Telos
- Radical Democracy, Personal Freedom, and the Transformative Potential of Politics
- Democracy and Value Pluralism
- The Problem of Russian Democracy: Can Russia Rise Again?
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION: DEMOCRACY VERSUS LIBERALISM?
The relationship between participatory democracy (the rule of and by a socially diverse citizenry) and constitutional liberalism (a regime predicated on the protection of individual liberties and the rule of law) is a famously troubled one. The purpose of this essay is to suggest that, at least under certain historical conditions, participatory democracy will indeed support the establishment of constitutional liberalism. That is to say, the development of institutions, behavioral habits, and social values centered on the active participation of free and equal citizens in democratic politics can lead to the extension of legally enforced immunities from coercion to citizens and noncitizens alike. Such immunities, here called “quasi-rights,” are at least preconditions for the personal autonomy and liberty in respect to choice-making that are enshrined as the “rights of the moderns.” This essay, which centers on one ancient society, does not seek to develop a formal model proving that democracy will necessarily promote liberal constitutionalism. However, by explaining why a premodern democratic citizenry of free, adult, native males–who sought to defend their own interests and were unaffected by Enlightenment or post-Enlightenment ideals of inherent human worth–chose to extend certain formal protections to slaves, women, and children, it may point toward the development of a model for deriving liberalism from democratic participation. Development of such a model could have considerable bearing on current policy debates.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Democracy , pp. 27 - 61Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000
- 1
- Cited by