Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:55:00.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Institutional Incapacity, the Attentive Public, and Media Pluralism in Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ellen Mickiewicz
Affiliation:
Duke University
Richard Gunther
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Anthony Mughan
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

The Russian mass media, and particularly television, have been associated in recent years with changes that have a profound significance for democracy. Post-Soviet Russia is a huge, complex, turbulent country where mass media, penetrating the farthest reaches of a vast territory spanning 11 time zones, abruptly shifted from one structural design to another in the space of only a few years. The changes wrought over this period tell us much about the interaction between media systems and political change. The reforms introduced by the last leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, resulted in reduced regulation and ultimately the erosion and implosion of institutions of power. Space was thereby made for the birth of pluralism. In post-Soviet Russia, problems attendant on the development of new institutions to buffer editorial autonomy from political and commercial power have produced a peculiar paradox: the most impartial and comprehensive public-interest programming comes from commercial media organizations.

Market pressures made the establishment of a brand imperative in an increasingly competitive media sector, and the legitimacy of commercial structures as purveyors of news had to be built up and consistency displayed. Thus, to enter the news business credibly, a commercial news organization had to be perceived as bringing a new set of values and techniques to the Russian public. NTV, the largest commercial network in post-Soviet Russia, achieved this branding during the first war in Chechnya. Competition led the new commercial network to differentiate itself in terms of sophistication, balance, accuracy, and production values.

Type
Chapter
Information
Democracy and the Media
A Comparative Perspective
, pp. 85 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×