Book contents
- The Dementia Manifesto
- Endorsements for The Dementia Manifesto
- The Dementia Manifesto
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Authors’ Note
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Manifestos, Dementia, and Values-Based Practice
- Chapter 2 Enhancing Values-Based Practice and Developing a Dementia Manifesto
- Chapter 3 The Dementia Manifesto
- Chapter 4 Rights and Values Are Everywhere in Dementia!
- Chapter 5 Reasoning about Values
- Chapter 6 Relationships – Values and Person-Centred Care
- Chapter 7 Working Together
- Chapter 8 Scientifically Speaking
- Chapter 9 The Science-Driven Principle and Dementia
- Chapter 10 The Squeaky Wheel Principle
- Chapter 11 Communication, End of Life, and Values
- Chapter 12 Partnerships in Decision Making
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Chapter 12 - Partnerships in Decision Making
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2019
Book contents
- The Dementia Manifesto
- Endorsements for The Dementia Manifesto
- The Dementia Manifesto
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Authors’ Note
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Manifestos, Dementia, and Values-Based Practice
- Chapter 2 Enhancing Values-Based Practice and Developing a Dementia Manifesto
- Chapter 3 The Dementia Manifesto
- Chapter 4 Rights and Values Are Everywhere in Dementia!
- Chapter 5 Reasoning about Values
- Chapter 6 Relationships – Values and Person-Centred Care
- Chapter 7 Working Together
- Chapter 8 Scientifically Speaking
- Chapter 9 The Science-Driven Principle and Dementia
- Chapter 10 The Squeaky Wheel Principle
- Chapter 11 Communication, End of Life, and Values
- Chapter 12 Partnerships in Decision Making
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Dementia ManifestoPutting Values-Based Practice to Work, pp. 178 - 198Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adams, T., Holman, M., and Mitchell, G. (2003). Multidisciplinary teamworking. In Keady, J., Clarke, C., and Adams, T., eds., Community Mental Health Nursing and Dementia Care. Maidenhead and Philadelphia: Open University Press, 33–44.Google Scholar
Arstein-Kerslake, A., Watson, J., Browning, M., Martinis, J. ,and Blanck, P. (2017). Future directions in supported decision-making. Disability Studies Quarterly 37, 1. http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5070/4549 (accessed 22 January 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., Tulloch, A., Mackenzie, C., et al. (2013). Assessment of mental capacity in psychiatric inpatients: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry 13, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-244X-13-115 (accessed 22 January 2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burch, M., Jutten, T., Martin, W., and Michalowski, S. (2014). Achieving CRPD Compliance. Essex: University of Essex, The Essex Autonomy Project. https://autonomy.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/EAP-Position-Paper-FINAL.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Caughey, C., Hempsey, A., Martin, W., et al. (2016). Three Jurisdictions Report: Towards Compliance with CRPD Art. 12 in Capacity/Incapacity Legislation across the UK. Essex: University of Essex, The Essex Autonomy Project. https://autonomy.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/EAP-3J-Final-Report-2016.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Chakkalackal, L. (2014). The value of peer support on cognitive improvement amongst older people living with dementia. Research, Policy and Planning 31, 127–41. http://ssrg.org.uk/members/files/2015/07/Chakkalackal_v2.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Coulter, A., and Collins, A. (2011). Making Shared Decision-Making a Reality. London: The King's Fund. www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/Making-shared-decision-making-a-reality-paper-Angela-Coulter-Alf-Collins-July-2011_0.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Drennan, V., Rait, G., Cole, L., Grant, R., and Iliffe, S. (2013). The prevalence of incontinence in people with cognitive impairment or dementia living at home: A systematic review. Neurology and Urodynamics 32, 314–24. http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/23984/1/Drennan-V-23984.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, S. (2015). Decision-making and dementia – how well does the Mental Capacity Act serve people living with the condition? Elder Law Journal 5(1), 74–83.Google Scholar
Ellis, C., Hunt, M. R., and Chambers-Evans, J. (2011). Relational autonomy as an essential component of patient-centred care. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4, 79–101. www.mcgill.ca/biomedicalethicsunit/files/biomedicalethicsunit/ellshuntchambersrelationalautonomyijfab2011.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Firth, G., and Barber, M. (2011). Using Intensive Interaction with a Person with a Social or Cognitive Impairment. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Frost, L. A., and Bondy, A. S. (1994). PECS: The Picture Exchange Communications System Training Manual. Cherry Hill, NJ: Pyramid Educational Consultants.Google Scholar
Luker, K. A., Austin, L., Caress, A., and Hallett, C. E. (2008). The importance of ‘knowing the patient’: Community nurses’ constructions of quality in providing palliative care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 31(4), 775–82.Google Scholar
McCabe, R., and Priebe, S. (2004). The therapeutic relationship in the treatment of severe mental illness: A review of methods and findings. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 50(2), 115–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Midgley, M. (2010). The Solitary Self: Darwin and the Selfish Gene. Durham: Acumen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Justice. (2007). Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice. London: HMSO. www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/497253/Mental-capacity-act-code-of-practice.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Miranda-Castillo, C., Woods, B., and Orrell, M. (2010). People with dementia living alone: What are their needs and what kind of support are they receiving? International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 607–17. www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics/article/people-with-dementia-living-alone-what-are-their-needs-and-what-kind-of-support-are-they-receiving/6AE02C5BA023C45A8A5A79F6A30B6963 (accessed 22 January 2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2009). Dementia: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Dementia-report-Oct-09.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Reynolds, B. (2009). Developing therapeutic one-to-one relationships. In Barker, P., ed., Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
Struble, L. M., Kavanagh, J., and Blazek, M. (2013). Services for people with moderate dementia. In de Waal, H., Lyketsos, C., Ames, D., and O'Brien, J., eds., Designing and Delivering Dementia Services. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompsell, A. (2011). Support to care homes. In Dening, T. and Milne, A., eds., Mental Health and Care Homes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 221–36.Google Scholar
Williams, V., Boyle, G., Jepson, M., et al. (2012). Making Best Interests Decisions: People and Processes. London: Mental Health Foundation. www.mentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/BIDS_report_24-02-12_FINAL1.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2004). Can two wrongs make a right? Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 11, 159–63. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/173772 (accessed 22 January 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T., and Kirtley, A. (2016). Dementia Truth Inquiry. Review of Evidence. London: Mental Health Foundation. www.mentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/dementia-truth-enquiry-roe_0.pdf (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar