Avineri, N. (2010) ‘The interactive organization of “insight”: Clinical interviews with frontotemporal dementia patients.’ In Mates, A. W., Mikesell, L. and Smith, M. S. (eds.) Language, Interaction and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind. London: Equinox, pp. 115–138.Google Scholar

Clayman, S. E. and Heritage, J. (2014) ‘Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests.’ In Drew, P., and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (eds.) Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 55–86.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014) ‘What does grammar tell us about action?’ Pragmatics, 24(3): 623–647. doi:10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. (1984) ‘Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection.’ In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–128.Google Scholar

Drew, P. (2018) ‘Epistemics in social interaction.’ Discourse Studies, 20(1): 163–187. doi:10.1177/1461445617734347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drew, P. and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014) ‘Requesting – from speech act to recruitment.’ In Drew, P., and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (eds.) Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Elfrink, T. R., Zuidema, S. U., Kunz, M. and Westerhof, G. J. (2018) ‘Life story books for people with dementia: A systematic review.’ International Psychogeriatrics, 30(12): 1797–1811. doi:10.1017/S1041610218000376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ferrara, K. W. (1994) Therapeutic Ways with Words. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Hepburn, A. and Bolden, G. B. (2013) ‘The conversation analytic approach to transcription.’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984) ‘A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.’ In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (2013) ‘Epistemics in conversation.’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 370–394.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (2015) ‘A family living with Alzheimer’s disease: The communicative challenges.’ Dementia, 14(5): 555–573. doi:10.1177/1471301213502213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kendrick, K. H., and Drew, P. (2016). ‘Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kipps, C. M. and Hodges, J. R. (2006) ‘Theory of mind in frontotemporal dementia.’ Social Neuroscience, 1(3–4): 235–244. doi:10.1080/17470910600989847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Landmark, A. M. D., Gulbrandsen, P. and Svennevig, J. (2015) ‘Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 78: 54–69. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1992) ‘Activity types and language.’ In Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–100.Google Scholar

Mates, A. W. (2010) ‘Using social deficits in frontotemporal dementia to develop a neurobiology of person reference.’ In Mates, A. W., Mikesell, L. and Smith, M. S. (eds.) Language, Interaction and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind. London: Equinox, pp. 139–166.Google Scholar

Mchoul, A. (1978) ‘The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom.’ Language in Society, 7(2): 183–213. doi:10.1017/S0047404500005522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehan, H. (1979) Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikesell, L. (2009) ‘Conversational practices of a frontotemporal dementia patient and his interlocutors.’ Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42(2): 135–162. doi:10.1080/08351810902864552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikesell, L. (2014) ‘Conflicting demonstrations of understanding in the interactions of individuals with frontotemporal dementia: Considering cognitive resources and their implications for care and communication.’ In Schrauf, R. W. and Müller, N. (eds.) Dialogue and Dementia: Cognitive and Communicative Resources for Engagement. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 147–180.Google Scholar

Mishler, E. (1984) The Discourse of Medical Interviews. New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar

Mondada, L. (2018). ‘Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1): 85–106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muntigl, P., Hödl, S. and Ransmayr, G. (2014) ‘Epistemics and frontotemporal dementia.’ Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica – Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 9(1): 69–95.Google Scholar

Neary, D., Snowden, J. S., Gustafson, L. et al. (1998) ‘Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria.’ Neurology, 51(6): 1546–1554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nilsson, E. (2017) ‘Fishing for answers: Couples living with dementia managing trouble with recollection.’ Educational Gerontology, 43(2): 73–88. doi:10.1080/03601277.2016.1260911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Keeffe, F. M., Murray, B., Coen, R. F., Dockree, P. M., Bellgrove, M. A., Garavan, H., Lynch, T. and Robertson, I. H. (2007) ‘Loss of insight in frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy.’ Brain, 130(3): 753–764. doi:10.1093/brain/awl367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pomerantz, A. (1980) ‘Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device.’ Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4): 186–198. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00020.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1984) ‘Pursuing a response.’ In Atkinson, J.M., and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–166.Google Scholar

Rossi, G. (2012) ‘Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and mi X? interrogatives in Italian.’ Discourse Processes, 49(5): 426–458. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.684136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E. A. (1979) ‘Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction.’ In Psathas, G. (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 15–21.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2000) ‘On granularity.’ Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1): 715–720. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977) ‘The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.’ Language, 53(2): 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sidnell, J. (2013) ‘Basic Conversation Analytic Methods.’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T., (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 77–99. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch5.Google Scholar

Sorjonen, M.-L., Raevaara, L. A. and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2017) ‘Imperative turns at talk: An introduction.’ In Sorjonen, M.-L., Raevaara, L. A. and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (eds.) Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevanovic, M. and Peräkylä, A. (2014) ‘Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations.’ Language in Society, 43(2): 185–207. doi:10.1017/S0047404514000037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevanovic, M. and Svennevig, J. (2015) ‘Introduction: Epistemics and deontics in conversational directives.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 78: 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svennevig, J. and Landmark, A. M. D. (2019) ‘Accounting for forgetfulness in dementia interaction.’ Linguistics Vanguard, 5(s2). doi:10.1515/lingvan-2018-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, R. (2011) ‘Dementia and epistemic authority: A conversation analytic case study.’ Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 11(2): 65–93.Google Scholar

Dynel, M. (2011) ‘Revisiting Goffman’s postulates on participant statuses in verbal interaction.’ Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(7): 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1979) ‘The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation.’ In Psathas, G. (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 97–121.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1996) ‘Transparent vision.’ In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 370–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2018) Co-operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. (1992) ‘Context, activity and participation.’ In Auer, P. and di Luzio, A. (eds.) The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. (2004) ‘Participation.’ In Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Maldan, MA: Blackwell, pp. 222–244.Google Scholar

Hamilton, H. (2019) Language, Dementia and Meaning Making. Navigating Challenges of Cognition and Face in Everyday Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinemann, T., Lindström, A. and Steensig, J. (2011) Addressing epistemic incongruence in question–answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs.’ In Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds.) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–130. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511921674.006.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984) ‘A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.’ In Maxwell Atkinson, J. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1985) ‘Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an “overhearing” audience.’ In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Academic Press, vol. 3, pp. 95–117.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (2012) ‘Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge.’ Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. (2005) ‘The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1): 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hydén, L-C. and Nilsson, E. (2015) ‘Couples with dementia: Positioning the “we”.’ Dementia, 14(6): 716–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hydén, L. C. and Samuelsson, C. (2019) ‘“So they are not alive?”: Dementia, reality disjunctions and conversational strategies.’ Dementia, 18(7–8): 2662–2678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Josephs, K. A. (2007) ‘Capgras syndrome and its relationship to neurodegenerative disease.’ Archives in Neurology, 64(12): 1762–1766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koole, T. (2012) ‘The epistemics of student problems: Explaining mathematics in a multi-lingual class.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 44: 1902–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Landmark, A. M. D., Nilsson, E., Ekström, A. and Svennevig, J. (2021) ‘Couples living with dementia managing conflicting knowledge claims.’ Discourse Studies, 23(2): 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindholm, C. (2008) ‘Laughter, communication problems and dementia.’ Communication & Medicine, 5(1): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindholm, C. (2016) ‘Boundaries of participation in care home settings: Use of the Swedish token jaså by a person with dementia.’ Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30(10): 832–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindholm, C. and Stevanovic, M. (2022) ‘Challenges of trust in atypical interaction.’ Pragmatics and Society 13(1): 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linell, P. (2009) Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar

Linell, P. and Luckmann, T. (1991) ‘Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries.’ In Marková, I and Foppa, K. (eds.) Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Marcusson, J., Blennow, K., Skoog, I. and Wallin, A. (2011) Alzheimers sjukdom och andra kognitiva sjukdomar [Alzheimer’s disease and other cognitive diseases]. Stockholm: Liber AB.Google Scholar

Mondada, L. (2016) ‘Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3): 336–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muntigl, P. and Choi, K. T. (2010) ‘Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couples therapy.’ Discourse Studies, 12(3): 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muntigl, P., Hödl, S. and Ransmayr, G. (2014) ‘Epistemics and frontotemporal dementia.’ Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 9(1): 69–95.Google Scholar

Nilsson, E. (2017) ‘Fishing for answers: Couples living with dementia managing trouble with recollection.’ Educational Gerontology, 43(2): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nilsson, E. and Olaison, A. (2019) ‘What is yet to come? Couples living with dementia orienting themselves towards an uncertain future.’ Qualitative Social Work, 18(3): 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nilsson, E., Ekström, A. and Majlesi, A‑R. (2018) ‘Speaking for and about a spouse with dementia: A matter of inclusion or exclusion?’ Discourse Studies, 20(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerantz, A. M. (1980) ‘Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device.’ Sociological Inquiry, 50: 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rae, J. (2001) ‘Organizing participation in interaction: Doing participation framework.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(2): 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, H. (1973) ‘On some puns with some intimations.’ In Shuy, R. W. (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 135–144.Google Scholar

Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Vols. I & II, Jefferson, G. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (2011) ‘Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction.’ In Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds.) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svennevig, J. and Landmark, A. M. D. (2019) ‘Accounting for forgetfulness in dementia interaction.’ Linguistics Vanguard, 5(s2): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, R. (2007) ‘Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3): 542–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2006) ‘Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2): 150–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, V., Webb, J., Dowling, S. and Gall, M. (2019) ‘Direct and indirect ways of managing epistemic asymmetries when eliciting memories.’ Discourse Studies, 21(2): 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alzheimer’s Society (2024) ‘What not to say to somebody with dementia.’ https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/blog/language-dementia-what-not-to-say.Google Scholar

Antaki, C. (2011) ‘Six kinds of applied conversation analysis.’ In Antaki, C. (ed.) Applied Conversation Analysis: Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. (1990) ‘Quotations as demonstrations’ Language, 66(4): 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coupland, N., Coupland, J. and Giles, H. (1991) Language, Society and the Elderly: Discourse, Identity and Ageing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

De Beauvoir, S. (1972 [1970]) Old Age. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2009) Living Well with Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7a15a7ed915d6eaf153a36/dh_094051.pdf.Google Scholar

Drew, P. (1991) ‘Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions.’ In Markova, I. and Foppa, K. (eds.) Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 21–48.Google Scholar

Fivush, R. (2008) ‘Remembering and reminiscing: How individual lives are constructed in family narratives.’ Memory Studies, 1(1): 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fivush, R., Haden, C. and Reese, E. (1999) ‘Remembering, recounting and reminiscing: The development of autobiographical memory in context.’ In Rubin, D. C. (ed.) Remembering Our Past: Studies in Autobiographical Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 341–359.Google Scholar

Gauthier, S., Rosa-Neto, P., Morais, J. A. and Webster, C. (2021) World Alzheimer Report 2021: Journey through the Diagnosis of Dementia. Alzheimer’s Disease International. www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2021/Google Scholar

Glenn, P. J. (1989) ‘Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations.’ Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(2): 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glenn, P. J. (1995) ‘Laughing at and laughing with: Negotiations of participant alignments through conversational laughter.’ In ten Have, P. and Psathas, G. (eds.) Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 43–56.Google Scholar

Glenn, P. (2003) Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, E. (1967 [1955]) ‘On face-work.’ In Goffman, E, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1986) ‘Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments.’ Human Studies, 9(2–3): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1987) ‘Forgetfulness as an interactive resource.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2003) ‘Recognizing assessable names.’ In Glenn, P., LeBaron, C. and Mandelbaum, J. (eds.) Excavating the Taken-for-Granted: Essays in Social Interaction. A Festschrift in honour of Robert Hopper. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 151–161.Google Scholar

Haakana, M. (2010) ‘Laughter and smiling: Notes on co-occurrences.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6): 1499–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, H. E. (1994) Conversations with an Alzheimer’s Patient: An Interactional Sociolinguisitc Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, H. E. (2019) ‘Now what was that called?’ In Language, Dementia and Meaning Making. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J. C. (2012a) ‘Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J. C. (2012b) ‘Epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1): 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J. (2013) ‘Epistemics in conversation’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 370–394.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. (2005) ‘The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1): 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hydén, L. C. (2011) ‘Narrative collaboration and scaffolding in dementia.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 25(4): 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hydén, L. C. and Örulv, L. (2009) ‘Narrative and identity in Alzheimer’s disease: A case study.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 23(4): 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hydén, L. C., Plejert, C., Samuelsson, C. and Örulv, L. (2013) ‘Feedback and common ground in conversational storytelling involving people with Alzheimer’s disease.’ Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4(2): 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1972) ‘Side sequences.’ In Sudnow, D. N. (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, pp. 294–338.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1978) ‘Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation.’ In Schenkein, J. N. (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1979) ‘A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination.’ In Psathas, G. (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1984) ‘Laughter organization in talk about troubles.’ In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346–369.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004) ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.’ In Lerner, G. H. (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, D. (2015) ‘A family living with Alzheimer’s disease: The communicative challenges.’ Dementia, The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 14(5): 555–573.Google ScholarPubMed

Kindell, J., Sage, K., Keady, J. and Wilkinson, R. (2013) ‘Adapting to conversation with semantic dementia: using enactment as a compensatory strategy in everyday social interaction.’ International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(5): 497–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitwood, T. (1997) Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lerner, G. H. (2004) ‘Collaborative turn sequences.’ In Lerner, G. H. (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindley, L. (2016) ‘Competence in Everyday Interaction: A Conversation Analytic Approach to Repetition, Confusion and Getting Things Done when Living with Dementia.’ PhD thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, White Rose eTheses Online: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/14314/.Google Scholar

Lindley, L. (2020) ‘Foregrounding competence in interaction with a person with dementia: Co-participant responses to disordered talk.’ In Stickle, T. (ed.) Learning from the Talk of Persons with Dementia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Local, J. K. (2004) ‘Getting back to prior talk: And-uh(m) as a back connecting device in British and American English.’ In Couper-Kuhlen, E. (ed.) Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies of Phonetics and Prosody for Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, B. (2011) Hearing the Person with Dementia: Person-Centred Approaches to Communication for Families and Caregivers. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar

Mok, Z. and Müller, N. (2014) ‘Staging casual conversations for people with dementia.’ Dementia, 13(6): 834–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Müller, N. and Mok, Z. (2014) ‘“Getting to know you”: Situated and distributed cognitive effort in conversations with dementia.’ In Schrauf, R. W. and Müller, N. (eds.) Dialogue and Dementia: Cognitive And Communicative Resources for Engagement. Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 61–86.Google Scholar

Muntigl, P. and Choi, K. T. (2010) ‘Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couples therapy.’ Discourse Studies, 12(3): 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norrick, N. R. (1997) ‘Twice-told tales: Collaborative narration of familiar stories.’ Language in Society, 26: 199–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002090X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norrick, N. R. (2019) ‘Collaborative remembering in conversational narration.’ Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4): 733–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norrick, N. R. (2020) ‘The epistemics of narrative performance in conversation.’ Narrative Inquiry, 30(2): 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orange, J. B.(2001) ‘Family caregivers, communication and Alzheimer’s disease.’ In Lee Hummert, M. and Nussbaum, J. F. (eds.) Aging, Communication and Health: Linking Research and Practice for Successful Aging. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 225–248.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1980) ‘Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device.’ Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4): 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1984) ‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.’ In Maxwell Atkinson, J. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.Google Scholar

Raymond, G. and Heritage, J. C. (2006) ‘The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren.’ Language in Society, 35(5): 677–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabat, S. R. (2001) The Experience of Alzheimer’s Disease: Life through a Tangled Veil. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sabat, S. R. and Lee, J. M. (2011) ‘Relatedness among people diagnosed with dementia: Social cognition and the possibility of friendship.’ Dementia, 11(3): 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, volumes I and II. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.’ Language, 50(4): 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1981) ‘Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences.’ In Tannen, D. (ed.) Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1981), Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71–93.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973) ‘Opening up closings.’ Semiotica, 8(4), pp. 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (2011) ‘Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction.’ In Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds.) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vehviläinen, S. (2001) ‘Evaluative advice in educational counselling: The use of disagreement in the “stepwise” entry to advice.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(3): 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, R. (2007) ‘Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 37(3): 542–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar