Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Review of Moritz Schlick's General Theory of Knowledge
- 2 Einstein's Theory of Space
- 3 Reply to H. Dingler's Critique of the Theory of Relativity
- 4 A Report on an Axiomatization of Einstein's Theory of Space-Time
- 5 Reply to Th. Wulf's Objections to the General Theory of Relativity
- 6 Einstein's Theory of Motion
- 7 The Theory of Relativity and Absolute Transport Time
- 8 Reply to Anderson's Objections to the General Theory of Relativity
- 9 Review of Aloys Müller's The Philosophical Problems with Einstein's Theory of Relativity
- 10 The Philosophical Significance of the Theory of Relativity
- 11 Planet Clocks and Einsteinian Simultaneity
- 12 On the Physical Consequences of the Axiomatization of Relativity
- 13 Has the Theory of Relativity Been Refuted?
- 14 Response to a Publication of Mr. Hj. Mellin
- Index
13 - Has the Theory of Relativity Been Refuted?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Review of Moritz Schlick's General Theory of Knowledge
- 2 Einstein's Theory of Space
- 3 Reply to H. Dingler's Critique of the Theory of Relativity
- 4 A Report on an Axiomatization of Einstein's Theory of Space-Time
- 5 Reply to Th. Wulf's Objections to the General Theory of Relativity
- 6 Einstein's Theory of Motion
- 7 The Theory of Relativity and Absolute Transport Time
- 8 Reply to Anderson's Objections to the General Theory of Relativity
- 9 Review of Aloys Müller's The Philosophical Problems with Einstein's Theory of Relativity
- 10 The Philosophical Significance of the Theory of Relativity
- 11 Planet Clocks and Einsteinian Simultaneity
- 12 On the Physical Consequences of the Axiomatization of Relativity
- 13 Has the Theory of Relativity Been Refuted?
- 14 Response to a Publication of Mr. Hj. Mellin
- Index
Summary
Since the dispute over the theory of relativity has begun to die down over the last several years and the new theory has been even more successfully worked through, the most recent attacks upon it have come from the flank from which it was the least expected. They are not attacks on the philosophical motivation, and thereby not the well-known reproaches that the theory is “inconceivable” or “incompatible with common senses”; rather, we are now confronted with a physical experiment that stands in explicit contradiction to an assertion of the theory of relativity. This experiment was conducted by the American D. C. Miller at Mount Wilson and was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy, Washington (11, 382, 1925).
It concerns the so-called Michelson experiment, one of the most foundational pillars upon which the theory of relativity is constructed. This experiment traces back to the ideas of Maxwell, but it was Michelson, a scholar famous for his precision in optical measurement, who first carried it out. Michelson had already begun his investigation in the seventies in Berlin as an assistant to Helmholtz, and carried it out in the eighties in America. We can describe the experiment in schematic form in the following way (Fig. 13.1): two rigid arms are placed at right angles with mirrors S1 and S2 fixed perpendicularly to the arms at their end points.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Defending EinsteinHans Reichenbach's Writings on Space, Time and Motion, pp. 195 - 204Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006