Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:46:46.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Rejecting the Inter-American Court: Judicialization, National Courts, and Regional Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2010

Javier Couso
Affiliation:
Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile
Alexandra Huneeus
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, School of Law
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

At first glance, one might assume that judicialization at the national level would enhance the influence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). The Inter-American Human Rights System provides national courts with a ready-made arsenal of global legitimacy – in the form of treaty law and court opinions – with which to enter political battles. As politics is displaced from the legislature and the public square into the courts, and as social and political demands more frequently take on the form of an adversarial rights claim, it seems plausible that national judges will deploy this arsenal more frequently, fomenting, in turn, the Inter-American Court's influence. Scholarship on the European regional systems indeed suggests that national courts have played a pivotal role in regional legal integration (Alter 2001).

Conversely, it could also be that stronger, more politically savvy high courts will be jealous of their power, sidelining the supranational instance so as to retain final arbiter status. The U.S. Supreme Court, one of the world's most politically prominent tribunals, has a reputation for rejecting the jurisprudence of foreign courts. Most recently, it announced that the rulings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) are not directly binding on national courts and that the ICJ's interpretation of international treaties is not definitive. Furthermore, even as courts in Europe have been crucial to the integration of the European Union (EU) system, there have been backlashes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cultures of Legality
Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America
, pp. 112 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brewers-Carías, Allan R. 2009. La Interrelación entre los Tribunales Constitucionales de América Latina y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, y la Cuestión de la Inejectuabilidad de sus Decisiones en Venezuela. (On file with author).
Atria, Fernando. 2000. “Revisión Judicial: Sindrome de la Víctima Insatisfecha.” Estudios Publicos, 79: 347–402.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker Lorca, Arnulf. 2006. “International Law in Latin America or Latin American International Law? Rise, Fall, and Retrieval of a Tradition of Legal Thinking and Political Imagination.” Harvard International Law Journal, 47(1): 283–305.Google Scholar
Brewer-Carias, Allan R. 2009. “La Interrelación entre los Tribunales Constitucionales de Américan Latina y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, y la Cuestión de la Inejecutabilidad de sus Decisiones en Venezuela.” Paper presented at a conference at the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, March 30.
Carbonell, Miguel ed. 2007. Teoría del neoconstitucionalismo: Ensayos escogidos. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Cavallaro, James L. and Brewer, Stephanie Erin. 2008. “Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-first Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court.” American Journal of International Law, 102(4): 768–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couso, Javier. 2004. “The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Democratic Transition, 1990–2002.” In Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in the New Democracies, Gloppen, Siri, Gargarella, Roberto and Skaar, Elin, eds. Portland, OR: Frank Cass Publishers.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier. 2005. “The Judicialization of Chilean Politics: The Rights Revolution That Never Was.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, Sieder, Rachel, Schholden, Line and Angell, Alan, eds. 105–29. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier and Hilbink, Lisa. 2009. “Is Change on Its Way in Chile? Institutional Reforms and New Developments in Rights Adjudication in Chile.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, May 28–31, Denver, Colorado.
Domingo, Pilar. 2004. “Judicialization of Politics, or Politicization of the Judiciary? Recent Trends in Latin America.” Democratization, 11(1): 104–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Felipe. 2009. “The Experience of the Inter-American Human Rights System.” Paper delivered at the University of Wisconsin Law School, March 30.
Hawkins, Darren and Jacoby, Wade. 2008. “Partial Compliance: A Comparison of the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston MA, August 28–31.
Helfer, Laurence R. and Alter, Karen J.. 2009. “The Andean Tribunal of Justice and its Interlocutors: Understanding Preliminary Reference Patterns in the Andean Community.” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, 41.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. and Alter, Karen J. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication.” Yale Law Journal, 107 (2): 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2007. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2010. “Judging from a Guilty Conscience: The Chilean Judiciary's Human Rights Turn.” Law and Social Inquiry, 35(1): 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2006. The Dynamics of Judicial Stasis: Judges, Pinochet-Era Claims, and Judicial Legitimacy in Chile (1998–2005). Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alex Stone, eds. 2008. A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Landau, David. 2005. “The Two Discourses in Colombian Constitutional Jurisprudence: A New Approach to Modeling Judicial Behavior in Latin America.” In George Washington International Law Review, 37: 687–744.
Larkins, Christopher. 1998. “The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina.” Comparative Politics, 30(4): 423–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levit, Janet Koven. 1999. “The Constitutionalization of Human Rights in Argentina: Problem or Promise?Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 37: 281.Google Scholar
Melish, Tara. 2002. Protecting Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in the Inter-American Human Rights System: A Manual on Presenting Claims. New Haven: Schell Jr. Center for International Human Rights.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L. 2008. “Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” The European Journal of International Law, 19(1): 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naddeo, Cecilia. 2007. Co-Adjudicating Human Rights Conflicts: The Supreme Court of Argentina and the Inter-American System of Human Rights. Master's thesis, Stanford Leland University.
Naddeo, Cecilia. 2009. Untitled paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, May 28–31, Denver, Colorado.
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Parra, Oscar. 2009. Untitled paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, May 28–31, Denver, Colorado.
Pérez Perdomo, Rogelio. 2005. Judicialization and Regime Transformation: The Venezuelan Supreme Court. In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, Sieder, Rachel, Angell, Alan and Schholden, Line, eds. 263–92. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pisarello, Gerardo. 2007. “Globalización, Constitucionalismo, y Derecho.” In Teoría del Neoconstitucionalismo: Ensayos Escogidos, Carbonell, Miguel (ed.). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2004. Mixed Signals: U.S. Human Rights Policy and Latin America. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, Helen. 2009. Human Rights for the 21st Century: Sovereignty, Civil Society, Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 2002. “The Discovery of Law: Political Consequences in the Argentine Experience.” In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, Garth, Bryant and Dezalay, Yves, eds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 249–75.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 2005. “Petitioning and Creating Rights: Judicialization in Argentina. The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, Sieder, Rachel, Angell, Alan and Schholden, Line, eds. 263–92. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tate, Nate, and Vallinder, Torbjorn, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.
,Tribunal Supremo de Justicia, Venezuela. 2008. Caso Gustavo Álvarez Arias y otros). December 18, 2008. http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/diciembre/1939-181208-2008-08-1572.html. (December 18, 2009).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×