Book contents
- Culture Across the Curriculum
- Culture and Psychology
- Culture Across the Curriculum
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue
- Part I Basic Concepts
- Part II Teaching across the Psychology Curriculum
- In the Beginning
- Research and Statistics
- Biological Connections
- Development
- Cognition
- Social Psychology
- Health and Well-Being
- Personality, Disability, and Disorders
- Chapter 23 Personality Is Culturally Constructed and Maintained: Helping Students Think Globally about Themselves and Others
- Chapter 24 Integration of Culture in Teaching about Disability
- Chapter 25 Cultural Issues in the Teaching of Psychological Disorders
- Chapter 26 Culture-Infused Training in Clinical Psychology
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Chapter 23 - Personality Is Culturally Constructed and Maintained: Helping Students Think Globally about Themselves and Others
from Personality, Disability, and Disorders
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- Culture Across the Curriculum
- Culture and Psychology
- Culture Across the Curriculum
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue
- Part I Basic Concepts
- Part II Teaching across the Psychology Curriculum
- In the Beginning
- Research and Statistics
- Biological Connections
- Development
- Cognition
- Social Psychology
- Health and Well-Being
- Personality, Disability, and Disorders
- Chapter 23 Personality Is Culturally Constructed and Maintained: Helping Students Think Globally about Themselves and Others
- Chapter 24 Integration of Culture in Teaching about Disability
- Chapter 25 Cultural Issues in the Teaching of Psychological Disorders
- Chapter 26 Culture-Infused Training in Clinical Psychology
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Culture across the CurriculumA Psychology Teacher's Handbook, pp. 481 - 499Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Ames, R. T. (2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, R. T., & Rosemont, H. Jr. (1998). The analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York, NY: Ballentine.Google Scholar
Dahlgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9, 203–2013. doi:10.1037/1089–2680.9.3.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., & Freeman, M. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70, 1–9. doi:10.1037/a0038597Google Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2011). Culture and theories of personality: Western, Confucian, and Buddhist perspectives. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives (pp. 423–444). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2013). Personality. In Keith, K. D., (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. III, pp. 995–997). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2014). Personality as continuous stochastic process: What Western personality theory can learn from classical Confucianism. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(2), 111–128. doi:10.1007/s12124–013–9250–2Google Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2015). Being or becoming: Toward an open-system, process-centric view of personality. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 757–771. doi:10.1007/s12124–015–9329-zGoogle Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2017, February 6). Individual personality is best understood as process, not structure: A Confucian-inspired perspective. Culture & Psychology, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1354067X17692118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1978). Theories of personality (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111–1120. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.53.10.1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanhoe, P. J. (2000). Confucian moral self cultivation (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 28, 64–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.005.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Tompson, S. (2010). Envisioning the future of cultural neuroscience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 92–101. doi:10.1111/j.1467–839X.2010.01304.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. K. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 419–449. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709–145357Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.98.2.224Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420–430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2008). Culture and psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In John, O. P., Robbins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181.). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8721.2009.01619.xGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). The relationship between the structure of inter-individual and intra-individual variability: A theoretical and empirical vindication of developmental systems theory. In Staudinger, U. & Lindenberger, U. (Eds.), Understanding human development (pp. 339–360). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Valsiner, J. (2008). How generalization works through the single case: A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. In Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Strout-Yagodzynski, S., & Clegg, J. (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. I, pp. 23–38). Rome: Firera.Google Scholar
Nesselroade, J. R., & Ram, N. (2004). Studying intraindividual variability: What we have learned that will help us understand lives in context. Research in Human Development, 1, 9–29. doi:10.1207/s15427617rhd0101&2_3Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310. doi:10.1037//0033–295X.108.2.291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosemont, H. Jr., & Ames, R. T. (2009). The Chinese classic of family reverence: A philosophical translation of the Xiaojing. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 373–386. doi:10.1002/jclp.20237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tu, W. (1989). Centrality and commonality: An essay on Confucian religiousness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tu, W. (1994). Embodying the universe: A note on Confucian self-realization. In Ames, R. T., Dissanayake, W., & Kasulis, T. P. (Eds.), Self as person in Asian theory and practice (pp. 177–186). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 279–292. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.77.2.279Google Scholar
Wallace, B. A., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and Western psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 690–701. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.61.7.690Google Scholar
Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). The meeting of meditative disciplines and Western psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 227–239. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.61.3.227Google Scholar
Wang, F., Peng, K., Chechlacz, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2017). The neural basis of independence versus interdependence orientations: A voxel-based morphometric analysis of brain volume. Psychological Science, 28, 519–529. doi:10.1177/0956797616689079Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2017). Five myths about the role of culture in psychological research. APS Observer, 30(1), 20–24.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & Ross, M. (2005). What we remember and what we tell: The effects of culture and self-priming on memory representations and narratives. Memory, 13, 594–606. doi:10.1080/09658210444000223Google Scholar