Book contents
- Critical Race Judgments
- Critical Race Judgments
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Advisory Committee
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 347 U.S. 483 (1954)BROWN et al.
- Part I Membership and Inclusion
- Part II Participation and Access
- 509 U.S. 630Supreme Court of the United States
- 528 U.S. 495Supreme Court of the United States
- 418 U.S. 717Supreme Court of the United States
- 275 U.S. 78Supreme Court of the United States
- Supreme Court of the United States
- 551 U.S. 701Supreme Court of the United States
- 477 U.S. 57 (1986)
- Part III Property and Space
- Part IV Intimate Choice and Autonomy
- Part V Justice
418 U.S. 717Supreme Court of the United States
William G. MILLIKEN, Governor of Michigan, et al., Petitioners,v.Ronald BRADLEY and Richard Bradley, by their mother and next friend, Verda Bradley, et al.ALLEN PARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al., Petitioners,v.Ronald BRADLEY and Richard Bradley, by their mother and next friend, Verda Bradley, et al.The GROSSE POINTE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, Petitioner,v.Ronald BRADLEY and Richard Bradley, by their mother and next friend, Verda Bradley, et al.Nos. 73–434, 73–435 and 73–436
from Part II - Participation and Access
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2022
- Critical Race Judgments
- Critical Race Judgments
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Advisory Committee
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 347 U.S. 483 (1954)BROWN et al.
- Part I Membership and Inclusion
- Part II Participation and Access
- 509 U.S. 630Supreme Court of the United States
- 528 U.S. 495Supreme Court of the United States
- 418 U.S. 717Supreme Court of the United States
- 275 U.S. 78Supreme Court of the United States
- Supreme Court of the United States
- 551 U.S. 701Supreme Court of the United States
- 477 U.S. 57 (1986)
- Part III Property and Space
- Part IV Intimate Choice and Autonomy
- Part V Justice
Summary
Argued February 27, 1974.Decided July 25, 1974.
Chief Justice ADAMS delivered the opinion of the Court.1
The question in this case is simple: may a federal court impose a multidistrict, area-wide school desegregation remedy when doing so is necessary to cure a constitutional violation in a single school district? The answer is yes because Brown v. Board of Education requires it.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Critical Race JudgmentsRewritten U.S. Court Opinions on Race and the Law, pp. 217 - 234Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022