Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:17:07.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2019

Christopher Markiewicz
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Crisis of Kingship in Late Medieval Islam
Persian Emigres and the Making of Ottoman Sovereignty
, pp. 305 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Baṣīrī, . Dīvān-i Bāṣīrī. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Aşir Efendi 292.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Ḥusām al-Dīn ʿAlī. Jāmiʿ al-tanwīl wa al-taʾwīl. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Mss. Şehid Ali Paşa 109, 110, 111, 112.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Ḥusām al-Dīn ʿAlī. Kanz al-khafī fī bayān maqāmāt al-ṣūfī. Ankara, Milli Kütüphane, Ms. Nevşehir ÜR 201/3.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Ḥusām al-Dīn ʿAlī. Sharḥ-i Gulshan-i Rāz. Antalya (Turkey), Antalya İl Halk Kütüphanesi, Ms. 164.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Ḥusām al-Dīn ʿAlī. Sharḥ iṣṭilaḥāt al-ṣūfiyya. Manisa (Turkey), Manisa İl Halk Kütüphanesi, Ms. 1134.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Ḥusām al-Dīn ʿAlī. Sharḥ khuṭbat al-bayān amīr al-muʾminīn ʿAlī (karrama Allāh wajhahu). Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 1777.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Asrār ʿibādat al-ṣiyām. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 1994.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Chihil Hadīs. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 469.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Dīvān-i Qāżī ʿĪsā va Najm al-Dīn Masʿūd. Istanbul, Atatürk Kitaplığı, Ms. Muallım Cevdet 121.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Ḥaqq al-mubīn fī sharḥ risālat ḥaqq al-yaqīn. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 2338.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Ḥāshīya ʿalā anwār al-tanzīl. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 303-M.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Nuruosmaniye 3209.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphansi, Ms. Hazine 1655.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 2199.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 2198.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 3538.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 3541.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 3542.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Nurosmaniye 3212.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Berlin, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Ms. Orient no. 3179.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, İstanbul Üniversitesi Nadir Eserler Kütüphanesi, Ms. FY 619.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Hasht bihisht. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Halet Efendi İlavesi 191–91.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. al-Ibāʾ ʿan mawāqiʿ al-wabāʾ. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Şehid Ali Paşa 2032.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Khavāṣṣ al-ḥayawān. Istanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Ms. Hazine 1665.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Majmūʿa. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 3986.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Majmūʿa. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ragıp Paşa 919.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Mirʾāt al-jamāl. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Şehid Ali Paşa 2149.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Mirʾāt al-jamāl. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Nurosmaniye 4241.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Mirʾāt al-ʿushshāq. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 1888.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Munāẓara-yi rūza va ʿīd. Istanbul. Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ayasofya Ms. 3203.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Munshaʾāt. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 3986.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Munshaʾāt. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 1888.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Qānūn-i shāhanshāhī. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 1888.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Risāla-yi khazanīya. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Esad Efendi Ms. 1888.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Risāla-yi rabīʿ al-abrār. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ayasofya Ms. 3986.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Risālat al-nafs. Manchester, John Rylands Library, Ms. Arabic 403 [385].Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Risāla-yi rabīʿ al-abrār. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 1888.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Sharḥ-i qaṣīda-yi khamrīya. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ayasofya Ms. 4092.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Sharḥ-i qaṣīda-yi khamrīya. Istanbul, Millet Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ali Emiri Farsi 134.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Salīmshāhnāma. Istanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Ms. Emanet Hazinesi 1423.Google Scholar
Bisṭāmī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Naẓm al-sulūk fī musāmarat al-mulūk. Istanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Ms. III. Ahmet 1597.Google Scholar
Diyārbakrī, ʿAbd al-Ṣamad. Tercüme en-nüzhe es-seniyye fī zikri’l-ḫulefā ve’l-mülūki’l-mıṣriyye. London, British Library, Ms. Add. 7846.Google Scholar
Ebūʾl-Fażl, Meḥmed, Inshā. Istanbul, İstanbul Üniversitesi Nadir Eserler Kütüphanesi, Ms. F 906.Google Scholar
Ebūʾl-Fażl, Meḥmed, Munteḫab ve muḫteṣar Vaṣṣāf tarīḫi tercümesi. Istanbul, Millet Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ali Emiri Tarih 619.Google Scholar
Ebüʾs-suʿūd, Efendi. Fatāwā. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. 1051/6.Google Scholar
Beğ, Ferīdūn, Münşeʾāt es-selātīn. Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi Ms. Reisülküttab 892.Google Scholar
al-Ījī, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm. Tuḥfat al-faqīr ilā ṣāḥib al-sarīr. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Turhan Valide Sultan 231.Google Scholar
Inshāʾ. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 3369.Google Scholar
Jāmī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Kulliyāt-i Jāmī. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Fatih 4045.Google Scholar
Jīlānī, Ḥusām ibn Shams al-Dīn. Jāmiʿ al-qismayn. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 2414-M.Google Scholar
al-Kāfiyajī, Muḥyi al-Dīn. Kitāb al-Mukhtaṣar al-mufīd fī ʿilm al-taʾrīkh. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 4438.Google Scholar
al-Kāfiyajī, Muḥyi al-Dīn. Kitāb al-Mukhtaṣar al-mufīd fī ʿilm al-taʾrīkh. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 3403.Google Scholar
Kemālpaşazāde, , al-Risālat al-maʿmūla fī taṣḥīḥ lafẓ al-zindīq wa tawḍīḥ maʿnāhi al-daqīq. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Şehid Ali Paşa 1708.Google Scholar
Keşfī, Meḥmed. Bāġ-i firdevs-i ġuzāt ve ravżat-i ehl-i cihād. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 2147.Google Scholar
Lāmıʿī, Çelebi. Münşeʾāt-i Lāmiʿī. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Esad Efendi 3316.Google Scholar
al-Malaṭī, ʿAbd al-Bāsiṭ bin Khalīl. Kitāb al-bustān al-nawrī al-marfūʿ li-ḥaḍrat al-sulṭān al-ghawrī. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 4793.Google Scholar
Māzandarānī, ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad. Risāla-yi Falakīya. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 2756.Google Scholar
Nūrbakhsh, Muḥammad. Risālat al-Hudā. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Fatih 5367.Google Scholar
al-Nikidī, Muḥammad ibn Yaʿqūb. Majmūʿa. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Nurbanu Sultan 122.Google Scholar
Niẓāmī, Ḥasan. Tāj al-maʾāsir. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 2991.Google Scholar
Niẓāmī, Ḥasan. Tāj al-maʾāsir. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Fatih 4204.Google Scholar
Qāżīzāda, Kabīr ʿAbd al-Laṭīf. Ghazavāt-i Salīm Khān. Istanbul, Hacı Selim Ağa Kütüphanesi Ms. 825.Google Scholar
Qāżīzāda, , Wafayāt al-aʿyān. Oxford, Bodleian Library, Ms. Ouseley 176 a+b.Google Scholar
Ramażān (Ṭabīb), , al-Risāla al-fatḥiyya al-Sulaymāniyya. Istanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Revan 1279.Google Scholar
Sarı, ʿAbdullāh Efendi. Munshaʾāt-i fārsī. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Esad Efendi 3333.Google Scholar
Sharḥ-i qaṣīda-yi Sulṭān Salīm. Istanbul, Hacı Selim Ağa Kütüphanesi Ms. 560.Google Scholar
Shukrullāh, . Bahjat al-tavārīkh. Istanbul, Süleymaniyye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 2990.Google Scholar
Sücūdī, , Tarīḫ-i Sulṭān Selīm Ḫān. Istanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Ms. Revan 1284.Google Scholar
Tabrīzī, Shāh Qāsim. Kanz al-jawāhir al-sanīya fī’l-futūḥāt al-sulaymāniyya. Süleymaniyye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 3392.Google Scholar
Taşköprizāde, Aḥmad. Risāla fī bayān asrār al-khilāfa al-insānīya wa’l-salṭana al-manʿawīya. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Carullah 2098.Google Scholar
Taşköprizāde, Aḥmad. Risāla fī bayān asrār al-khilāfa al-insānīya waʾl-salṭana al-manʿawīya. Istanbul, Beyazıt Kütüphanesi, Ms. Veliyyüddin 3275.Google Scholar
al-ʿUqūd al-jawharīya fīʾl-nawādir al-ghawrīya. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ayasofya 3312, 3313.Google Scholar
Uzun, Firdevsī. Münāẓere-yi seyf ü kalem. Istanbul, Millet Kütüphanesi, Ms. Ali Emiri Edebiyat 576.Google Scholar
Yazıcızāde, ʿAlī. Tevārīḫ-i āl-i Selcūq. Istanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Ms. Revan 1391.Google Scholar
Adā’ī Şīrāzī, Muhammed. Adā’ī̇-yi Şīrāzī ve Selim-nāmesi: inceleme-metin-çeviri. Edited by Bilgen, Abdüsselam. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2007.Google Scholar
Dâi, Ahmed-i. Çengnāme. Edited by Tekin, Gönül Alpay, vol. 16. Sources of Oriental Languages and Literatures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Üniversitesi, 1992.Google Scholar
Ahmedi, . İskender-Nāme: Inceleme-Tıpkıbasım. Edited by Ünver, İsmail. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu, 1983.Google Scholar
ʿĀlī, Muṣṭafā bin Aḥmed. Künhüʾl-aḫbār. 5 vols. Istanbul: Takvimhane-yi Amire, 1277 [1870–71].Google Scholar
ʿÂlī, Muṣṭafā bin Aḥmed. Künhü’l-ahbâr’ın tezkire kısmı. Edited by İsen, Mustafa. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi, 1994.Google Scholar
ʿÂlī, Muṣṭafā bin Aḥmed. Muṣṭafā ʻĀlī’s Künhüʼl-Aḫbār and Its Preface According to the Leiden Manuscript. Edited by Schmidt, Jan. Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te İstanbul, 1987.Google Scholar
ʿÂlī, Muṣṭafā bin Aḥmed. Kayseri Raşid Efendi Kütüphanesi’ndeki 901 ve 920 No.’lu Nüshalara Göre Kitâbü’t-Târīḫ-i Künhü’l-Aḫbâr. Edited by Uğur, Ahmet. Kayseri, Turkey: Erciyes Üniversitesi, 1997.Google Scholar
Âșık, Çelebi. Meşâʻirüʼş-Şuʻarâ: Inceleme, Metin. Edited by Kılıç, Filiz. 3 vols. Istanbul: İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, 2010.Google Scholar
Aşıkpaşazade, . Die Altosmanische Chronik Des ʿAşıkpaşazade. Edited by Giese, Friedrich. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz, 1928.Google Scholar
Ayvānsarāyī, Ḥāfıẓ Ḥüseyin. Ḥadīḳatu’l-cevāmiʿ. Edited by Bey, Ali Sati. İstanbul: Matbaa-i Âmire, 1281 [1865].Google Scholar
ʿAzzām, ʿAbd al-Wahhāb. Majālis al-Sulṭān al-Ghūrī: ṣafaḥāt min taʾrīkh Miṣr fī al-qarn al-ʿāshir al-Hijrī. Cairo: Maṭbaʻat Lajnat al-Taʼlīf wa-al-Tarjamah wa-al-Nashr, 1941.Google Scholar
al-Baghdādī, ʻAbd Allāh ibn Fatḥ Allāh. Turkmenische Herrscher des 15. Jahrhunderts in Persien und Mesopotamien nach dem Tārīh al-Ġiyāt̲i. Edited by Schmidt-Dumont, Marianne. Freiburg i. Br.: Schwarz, 1970.Google Scholar
Baranī, Żiyāʾ al-Dīn. Tārīkh-i Fīrūzshāhī. Edited by Khān, Sayyid Aḥmad. Calcutta, 1862.Google Scholar
Behişti, Ahmet Sinan Çelebi. Die Chronik des Ahmed Sinân Čelebi genannt Bihišti: eine Quelle zur Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches unter Sultan Bâyezid II. Edited by Moser, Brigitte, vol. 35. Beiträge zur Kenntnis Südosteuropas und des Nahen Orients. Munich: R. Trofenik, 1980.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. Qānūn-i shāhanshāhī. Edited by Allāh, ʻAbd. Ārānī, Masʻūdī. Tehran: Markaz-i Pazhūhishī-yi Mīrās̲-i Maktūb, 1387.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Idrīs. İdrîs-i Bidlîsî Selim Şah-nâme. Translated by Kırlangıç, Hicabi. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı, 2001.Google Scholar
Celâlzade, Mustafa. Geschichte Sultan Süleymān Ḳānūnīs von 1520 bis 1557, oder, Ṭabaḳāt ül-Memālik ve Derecāt ül-Mesālik. Edited by Kappert, Petra. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1981.Google Scholar
Celâlzade, Mustafa. Selim-nâme. Edited by Uğur, Ahmet and Çuhadar, Mustafa. Istanbul: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı, 1997.Google Scholar
al-Damīrī, Muḥammad ibn Mūsā. Ḥayāt al-ḥayawān al-kubrá. Edited by Ṣāliḥ, Ibrāhīm. Al-Ṭabʻah 1. 4 vols. Damascus: Dār al-Bashāʾir, 2005.Google Scholar
Davānī, Jalāl al-dīn Muḥammad. Akhlāq-i Jalālī. Edited by Ārānī, ʿAbdallah Masʿūdī. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Iṭṭilāʻāt, 1391.Google Scholar
Davānī, Jalāl al-dīn Muḥammad. “ʿArżnāma.” Edited by Efendi, Kilisli Rıfʿat. Millî Tetebbuʿlar Mecmūʿası II, no. 5 (n.d.): 273–305.Google Scholar
Davānī, Jalāl al-dīn Muḥammad. “Taḥqīq-i ʿadālat.” Edited by Haravī, Najīb Māyil. Mishkāt 18–19 (1368 [1989–90]): 35–47.Google Scholar
Davānī, Jalāl al-dīn Muḥammad. “Risāla-yi ʿadālat.” Edited by Haravī, Najīb Māyil. Majmūʿa-yi rasāʾil-i khaṭṭ-i farsī 1 (1368 [1989–90]): 60–72.Google Scholar
Davānī, Jalāl al-dīn Muḥammad. “Taḥqīq-i ʿadālat.” Edited by Haravī, Najīb Māyil. Mishkāt 18–19 (1368 [1989–90]): 35–47.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, . Iḥṣāʾ al-ʿulūm. Edited by Amīn, ʻUthmān. Cairo: Maktabat al-Anjlū al-Miṣrīyah, 1968.Google Scholar
Farrukhī, . Dīvān-i Farrukhī Sīstānī. Edited by Siyāqī, Muḥammad Dabīr. Tehran: Iqbāl, 1335 [1957].Google Scholar
Beğ, Ferīdūn. Münşeʾatüʾs-selāṭīn. 2v. Istanbul, 1274–75 [1858].Google Scholar
Ḥāfiẓ, . Dīvān-i Khvājah Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad Ḥāfiẓ Shīrāzī. Edited by Qazvīnī, Muḥammad and Ghanī, Qāsim. Tehran: Kitābfurūshī-i Zavvār, 1950.Google Scholar
Abrū, Ḥāfiẓ-i. Jughrāfiyā-yi Ḥafiẓ-i Abrū: mushtamil bar jughrāfiyā-yi tārīkhī-i diyār-i ʻArab, Maghrib, Andalus, Miṣr va Shām. 1st edition. Tehran: Bunyān, 1996.Google Scholar
Hamadānī, ʻAlī ibn Muḥammad. Z̲akhīrat al-mulūk. Edited by Anvārī, Maḥmūd, vol. 11. Tabrīz: Muʼassasah-i Tārīkh va Farhang-i Īrān, 1358 [1979].Google Scholar
al-Ḥamawī, Taqī al-Dīn Abū Bakr. Kitāb Qahwat al-inshāʾ. Edited by Veselý, Rudolf. Berlin: Klaus Schwartz Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Çelebi, Ḥaydar. “Rūznāme.” In Münşeʾātüʾs-selāṭīn. Istanbul, 1274–75 [1858].Google Scholar
Ibn Funduq, Tārīkh-i Bayhaq. Tehran, 1317 [1938].Google Scholar
Ibn Mīr Munshī al-Ḥusaynī, Aḥmad. Calligraphers and Painters: A Treatise by Qāḍī Aḥmad, son of Mīr-Munshī (circa A.H 1015/A.D.1606). Translated by Minorsky, Vladimir. Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1959.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Athīr, ʿIzz al-Dīn. Al-Kāmil Fī Al-Tāʾrikh. 1st edition. 11 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1997.Google Scholar
Ibn Iyās, . Badāʾiʿ al-zuhūr fī waqāʾiʿ al-duhūr. Edited by Muṣṭafā, Muḥammad. 2. Auflage bearbeitet und mit Einleitung und Indices versehen von Mohamed Mostafa. 5 vols. Cairo: In Kommission bei F. Steiner, Wiesbaden, 1960.Google Scholar
Ibn Jamāʿa, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm. Taḥrīr al-aḥkām fī tadbīr ahl al-Islām. Edited by Aḥmad, Fuʾād ʿAbd al-Munʿim. Al-Ṭabʿah 3. Doha: Riʾāsat al-Maḥākim al-Sharʿīyah wa-al-Shuʾūn al-Dīnīyah, 1988.Google Scholar
Ibn Kathīr, Ismāʿīl ibn ʿUmar. Nihāyat al-Bidāyah wa-al-nihāyah fī al-fitan wa-al-malāḥim. Edited by ʿAbīyah, Muḥammad Fahīm. 2 vols. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Naṣr, 1968.Google Scholar
Ibn Khaldūn, . The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History. Bollingen Series 43. New York: Pantheon Books, 1958.Google Scholar
Ibn Khaldūn, . Muqaddimat Ibn Khaldūn. Edited by Quatremère, Étienne. 3 vols. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān, 1970.Google Scholar
Ibn Sīna, . Tisʿ rasāʾīl fī al-ḥikmah wa-al-ṭabīʿīyat. Cairo: Maṭbaʻah Hindīyah bi-al-Mūsiki, 1908.Google Scholar
Ibn Ṭūlūn, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʻAlī. Mufākahat al-Khillān hī ḥawadith al-zamān : Taʾrīkh Miṣr qa-al-Shām. Cairo : al-Mu’assasah al-Miṣrīyah al-ʿĀmmah lil-Ta’ālīf wa-al-Tarjamah wa-al-Ṭibā’ah wa-al-Nashr, 1962.Google Scholar
al-Ījī, Aḍud al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Aḥmad. Kitāb al-Mawāqif fī ʿīlm al-kalām. Edited by ʿAṭiyya, Ibrāhīm al-Dasūqī and al-Ḥanbūlī, Aḥmad Muḥammad. Cairo, 1938.Google Scholar
Al-Ishbīlī, ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad. al-Durr al-muṣān fī sīrat al-Muẓaffar Salīm Khān. Cairo: ʿĪsā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1962.Google Scholar
al-Dīn Yūsuf Ahl, Jalāl. Farāʾid-i ghiyās̲ī. Edited by Moayyad, Heshmat, vol. 53. Zabān va adabīyāt-i Fārsī. Tehran: Foundation for Iranian Culture, 1977.Google Scholar
Jāmī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Inshā-yi Jāmī. Kānpūr: Naval Kishor, 1893.Google Scholar
Juvaynī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn ʿAṭā Malik. Taʾrīkh-i jahān-gushāy. 2 vols. London: Luzac, 1912.Google Scholar
Juvaynī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn ʿAṭā Malik. Genghis Khan: The History of the World Conqueror. Translated by Boyle, John Andrew. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
al-Kāfiyajī, Muḥammad ibn Sulaymān. al-Mukhtaṣar fī ʻilm al-taʾrīkh. Edited by al-Dīn ʻIzz al-Dīn, Muḥammad Kamāl. Al-Ṭabʻah 1. Beirut: ʻĀlam al-Kutub, 1990.Google Scholar
Karbalāʹī Tabrīzī, Ḥusayn. Rawz̤āt al-jinān va-jannāt al-janān. Edited by Qurrāʹī, Jaʻfar Sulṭān. Tehran: Bungāh-i Tarjumah va Nashr-i Kitāb, 1965.Google Scholar
Çelebi, Kātib. Kashf al-ẓunūn. Edited by Yaltkaya, Şerefettin and Belge, Kilisli Rifat. Istanbul: n.p., 1941–1943.Google Scholar
Kemāl, . Selâtîn-Nâme (1299–1490). Edited by Öztürk, Necdet. Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, sa. 16. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2001.Google Scholar
Kemalpaşazade, . Tevârih-i âl-i Osman VII. defter. Edited by Turan, Şerafettin. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1957.Google Scholar
Kemalpaşazade, . Tevârih-i Âl-i Osmân, I. Defter. Edited by Turan, Şerafettin. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1970.Google Scholar
Kemalpaşazade, . Tevârîḫ-i Âl-i Osmân. Edited by Uğur, Ahmet. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1997.Google Scholar
Kemalpaşazade, . Tevârîḫ-i Âl-i Osmân. VIII Defter: (transkripsiyon). Edited by Uğur, Ahmet. Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, sa. 10. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1997.Google Scholar
Khāqānī, , Dīvān Badīl ibn ʿAlī Najjār Khāqānī Shirvānī. Edited by al-Dīn Sajjādī, Żiyāʾ. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Zavvār, 1338 [1959].Google Scholar
Khunjī-Iṣfahānī, Fażl Allāh ibn Rūzbihān. Sulūk al-mulūk. Edited by Muvaḥḥid, Muḥammad ʿAlī. Tehran: Shirkat-i Sahāmī-i Intishārāt-i Khvārazmī, 1362 [1984].Google Scholar
Khunjī-Iṣfahānī, Fażl Allāh ibn Rūzbihān. Tārīkh-i ʿālam-ārā-yi amīnī. Edited by Woods, John E.. Revised and augmented. London: Royal Asiatic Society, 1992.Google Scholar
Khūʾī, Ḥusām al-Dīn Ḥasan ibn ʿAbd al-Muʾmin. Ghunyat al-kātib va munyat al-ṭālib; [va] Rusūm al-rasāʾil va nujūm al-fażāʾil. Edited by Erzi, Adnan Sadık. Ankara: Dānishkadah-i Ilahīyāt, Dānishgāh-i Anqarah, 1963.Google Scholar
Khwāndamīr, Ghiyās al-Dīn ibn Humām al-Dīn. Tārīkh-i ḥabīb al-siyar fī akhbār afrād bashar. 3rd edition. Tehran: Kitābfurūshī-i Khayyām, 1362 [1984].Google Scholar
al-Khwārizmī, ʻAbd al-Laṭīf Muḥammad. Mafātīḥ al-ʿulūm. Edited by Muḥammad ʻAbd, ʻAbd al-Laṭīf. Cairo: Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʻArabīyah, 1978.Google Scholar
Kınalızade, Hasan Çelebi. Tezkiretü’ş-şuarâ. 2 vols. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1978.Google Scholar
Kırımlu Hafız Hüsam, Teressül. 2008. Kırımlu Hafız Hüsam Teressül (Hacı Selimağa, Nurbanu No:122/5). Edited by Tekin, Şinasi, vol. 87. Sources of Oriental Languages and Literatures. Cambridge, MA: The Dept. of Near Eastern Languages and Literatures, Harvard University, 2008.Google Scholar
Kültüral, Zühal, and Beyreli, Latif, eds. Şerîfî Şehnâme çevirisi. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu, Türk Dil Kurumu, 1999.Google Scholar
Lārī, Muṣliḥ al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Ṣalāḥ. Mirʾāt al-adwār va mirqāt al-akhbār. Edited by Saghravāniyān, Sayyid Jalīl. Tehran: Markaz-i Nashr-i Mīrās-i Maktūb, 2014.Google Scholar
Latifı, . Tezkiretü’ş-şu’arâ ve tabsıratü’n-nuzamâ: inceleme, metin. Edited by Canım, Rıdvan. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Başkanlığı, 2000.Google Scholar
Lüṭfī, Paşa. Tevārīḫ-i Āl-i ʿOsmān. Istanbul: Matbaʿ-i ʿĀmire, 1922.Google Scholar
Maḥmūd, Gāvān. Manāẓir al-inshāʾ. Farhangistān-i Zabān va Adab-i Fārsī 12. Tehran: Farhangistān-i Zabān va Adab-i Fārsī, 1381.Google Scholar
Maḥmūd, Gāvān. Riyāz̤ al-inshāʾ. Edited by Ḥusayn, Chānd and Yazdani, Ghulam. Ḥaydarābād-i Dakkan: Sarkār-i ʻĀlī, 1948.Google Scholar
Masʿūd-i Saʿd, Salmānī. Dīvān. Edited by Yāsamī, Rashīd. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Pīrūz, 1339 [1960].Google Scholar
al-Māwardī, ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad. The Ordinances of Government: A Translation of Al-Aḥkām Al-Sulṭāniyya W’ Al-Wilāyāt Al-Dīniyya. Translated by Wahba, Wafaa H.. Reading: Garnet Publishing, 1996.Google Scholar
Mayhanī, Muḥammad ibn ’Abd al-Khāliq. Destūr-i Debīrī. Edited by Erzi, Adnan Sadık. Selçukiler devrine âid inşâ eserleri, 1. Ankara: Türk Tarih basımevi, 1962.Google Scholar
Māzandarānī, ʻAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad. Die Resalä-ye Falakiyyä des ’Abdollah ibn Mohammad ibn Kiya al- Mazandarani ; ein persischer Leitfaden des staatlichen Rechnungswesens (um 1363). Edited by Hinz, Walther, vol. Bd. 4. Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission Bd. 4. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1952.Google Scholar
Mecdi, Mehmed Efendi. Ḥadā’iq al-shaqā’iq. Edited by Özcan, Abdülkadir. Istanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 1989.Google Scholar
Mīr Khwānd, Muḥammad ibn Khāvandshāh. Tārīkh-i rawz̤at al-ṣafā. 10 vols. Tehran: Chāpkhāna-yi Pīrūz, 1338.Google Scholar
Miskawayh, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad. Tajārib al-umam. Edited by Caetani, Leone. 3 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill ; Printed for the Trustees of “E. J. W. Gibb Memorial,” 1909.Google Scholar
Miskawayh, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad. Tahdhīb al-akhlāq. Edited by Zurayq, Qusṭanṭīn. Beirut: al-Jāmiʿah al-Amīrkīyah fī Bayrūt, 1966.Google Scholar
Gülşenî, Muhyî-yi. Menâḳıb-i İbrâhîm-i Gülşenî. Edited by Yazıcı, Tahsin. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1982.Google Scholar
Mustawfī Qazvīnī, Ḥamd Allāh. Taʾrīkh-i guzīda. Edited by Browne, Edward Granville and Nicholson, Reynold Alleyne. Leiden: Brill, 1910.Google Scholar
Naṭanzī, Muʿīn al-Dīn. Muntakhab al-tavārīkh-i Muʿīnī, Extraits du Muntakhab al-tavarikh-i mu’ini (anonyme d’Iskandar). Edited by Aubin, Jean. Tehran: Kitābfurūshī-i Khayyām, 1336 [1957–58].Google Scholar
Navāʾī, ʻAbd al-Ḥusayn. Asnād va mukātabāt-i tārīkhī-i Irān az Taymūr tā Shāh Ismāʿīl. Tehran: Bungāh-i Tarjumah va Nashr, 1341 [1963].Google Scholar
Bey, Necâtî. Necatî Beg divanı. Edited by Tarlan, Ali Nihad. İstanbul: Millî Eğitim Basımevi, 1963.Google Scholar
Neşri, . Cihânnümâ: 6. Kısım: Osmanlı Tarihi (687–890/1288–1485): Giriş, Metin, Kronoloji, Dizin, Tıpkıbasım. Edited by Öztürk, Necdet. Istanbul: Çamlıca, 2008.Google Scholar
Efendi, Nev’i. Ilimlerin özü: Netayic el-Fünun. Edited by Tolgay, Ömer. Istanbul: İnsan Yay?nlar?, 1995.Google Scholar
Atayi, Nevizade. Ḥadāʾiq al-Ḥaqāʾiq fī takmīlat al-shaqāʾiq. Edited by Özcan, Abdülkadir. Istanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 1989.Google Scholar
Nīshāpūrī, Ẓāhir al-Dīn. Edited by Afshār, Ismāʿīl. Saljūqnāma. Tehran: Khāvar, 1332 [1953].Google Scholar
Nizami, Hasan. Taj Ul Maʾathir = The Crown of Glorious Deeds. Edited by M. Aslam Khan and Chander Shekhar. Translated by Saroop, Bhagwat. Delhi: Saud Ahmad Dehlavi, 1998.Google Scholar
ʿArūz̤ī, Niẓāmī. Chahār Maqāla (The Four Discourses) of Nidhámí-i ʿArúḍí-i Samarqandí. Translated by Browne, Edward Granville. London: Published by the Trustees of the E. J. W. Gibb Memorial, 1978.Google Scholar
Ganjavī, Niẓāmī. Khusraw va Shīrīn. Edited by Bakhtiyārī, Ḥusayn Pizhmān. Tehran: Ibn Sīnā, 1343 [1964].Google Scholar
al-Nuwayri, Shihab al-Din. The Ultimate Ambition in the Arts of Erudition: A Compendium of Knowledge from the Classical Islamic World. Edited and translated by Muhanna, Elias. New York: Penguin Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Oruç Beğ, . Oruç Beğ Tarihi (1288-1502). Edited by Öztürk, Necdet. Istanbul: Çamlıca, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Qalqashandī, Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī. Kitāb Ṣubḥ al-aʿshā. 14 vols. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʻah al-Amīrīyah, 1331.Google Scholar
al-Qaysarānī, Ibrāhīm ibn ʻAbd al-Raḥmān. al-Nūr al-lāʾiḥ wa-al-durr al-ṣādiḥ fī iṣṭifā Mawlānā al-Sulṭān al-malik al-Ṣāliḥ (Abū al-Fidā ʿImād al-Dīn Ismāʿīl ibn al-Nāṣir Muḥammad ibn al-Manṣūr Qalāwūn, 743–746H, 1342–1345M). Edited by Tadmurī, ʻUmar ʻAbd al-Salām. Trablus: Dār al-Inshā lil-Ṣiḥāfah wa-al-Ṭibāʻah wa-al-Nashr, 1982.Google Scholar
Qazvīnī, Ḥakīm Shāh Muḥammad. Taz̲kirah-i majālis al-nafāʼis. Edited by Ḥikmat, ʻAlī Aṣghar. Tehran: Kitābfurūshī-i Manūchihrī, 1363 [1984].Google Scholar
al-Qunawī, Ṣadr al-Dīn. “Tabṣirat al-mubtadī wa tadhkirat al-muntahī.” Edited by Najafqulī, Ḥabībī. Maʿārif 1 (1985 [1364]): 69128.Google Scholar
Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, Abū al-Qāsim al-Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad. Muḥāḍarāt al-udabāʾ wa-muḥāwarāt al-shuʻarāʾ wa-al- bulaghāʾ. Edited by al-Ḥamīd Murād, Riyāḍ ʻAbd. 2nd edition. 5 vols. Beirut: Dār Dār Ṣādir, 2006.Google Scholar
Rashīd al-Dīn, Fażl Allāh Hamadānī. Jāmiʿ al-tavārīkh. Edited by Rawshan, Muḥammad and Mūsavī, Muṣṭafá. 4 vols. Tehran: Nashr-i Alburz, 1373 [1994].Google Scholar
Rashīd al-Dīn, Fażl Allāh Hamadānī. Rashiduddin Fazlullah’s Jamiʿuʼt-Tawarikh = Compendium of Chronicles : A History of the Mongols. Translated by Thackston, W. M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Dept. of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, 1998.Google Scholar
Rashīdī, Aḥmad. Ḥusn al-ṣafā wa-al-ibtihāj bi-dhikr man waliya Imārat al-Ḥajj. Edited by Laylá ʻAbd al-Laṭīf Aḥmad. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1980.Google Scholar
Rāvandī, Abū Bakr Najm al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī. Rāḥat al-ṣudūr wa āyat al-surūr. Edited by Iqbal, Muhammad. London: Luzac, 1921.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʻUmar. Jāmiʻ al-ʻulūm, ya, Ḥadāyiq al-anwār fī ḥaqāyiq al-asrār: maʻrūf bih Kitāb-i Sittīnī. Edited by Tasbīḥī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. Tehran: Kitābkhānah-ʼi Asadī, 1346 [1967–68].Google Scholar
Rūmlū, Ḥasan. Aḥsan al-tavārīkh. Edited by Navāʼī, ʻAbd al-Ḥusayn. 2 vols. Tehran: Bungāh-i Tarjumah va Nashr-i Kitāb, 1349 [1970].Google Scholar
Saʿdeddīn, Ḫoca. Tācü’t-tevārīḫ. Istanbul: Tabhane-yi Âmire, 1279 [1863].Google Scholar
Saʿdī, . The Gulistan (Rose Garden) of Saʿdi. Translated by Thackston, W. M.. Bethesda, MD: Ibex Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar
al-Ṣafadī, Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn Khalīl. Kitāb al-wāfī bi’l-wafayāt. Leipzig: Deutschland Morgenländische Gesellschaft, 1931.Google Scholar
al-Sakhāwī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. al-Iʿlān bi’l-tawbīkh li-man dhamma al-taʾrīkh. Edited by Rosenthal, Franz. Baghdad, 1963.Google Scholar
al-Sakhāwī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. al-Ḍawʾ al-lāmiʿ li-ahl al-qarn al-tāsiʿ. 12 vols. Beirut: Dār Maktabat al-Ḥayāh, 1966.Google Scholar
al-Sakhāwī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. al-Maqāṣid al-ḥasana fi bayān kathīr min al-aḥādīth al-mushtahira ʿalā al-alsina. Edited by Ṣiddīq, ʿAbd Allah Muḥammad and al-Laṭīf, ʿAbd al-Wahhāb ʿAbd. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah, 1979.Google Scholar
Sehî, . Tez̲kire-i Sehī. Edited by Şükrü, Mehmed, vol. 1. Istanbul: Maṭbaʿa-ı Āmidī, 1325 [1907].Google Scholar
Beg, Sehī. Heşt Bihişt: Sehi Beg Tezkiresi: inceleme, tenkidli metni, dizin. Edited by Kut, Günay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1978.Google Scholar
Shabistarī, Maḥmūd ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm. The Gulshan ráz. Calcutta: Wyman & Co, 1876.Google Scholar
Shāmī, Niẓām al-Dīn. Histoire des conquêtes de Tamerlan: intitulée Ẓafarnāma. Edited by Tauer, Felix. Prague: Orientální ústav-Oriental institute, 1937.Google Scholar
Bidlīsī, Sharaf Khān. Schéref-Nâmeh: Ou, Histoire Des Kourdes. Edited by Veliaminov-Zernov, Vladimir Vladimirovich. 2 vols. Westmead: Gregg International, 1969.Google Scholar
Shīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn. Durrat al-tāj li-ghurat al-Dībaj. Edited by Mishkāt, Muḥammad. Tehran: Chāpkhānah-i Majlis, 1317 [1938].Google Scholar
Shushtarī, Nūr Allāh ibn ʻAbd Allāh. Kitāb mustaṭāb majālis al-muʾminīn. 2 vols. Tehran: Kitābfurūshi-ī Islāmīyah, 1365 [1986].Google Scholar
al-SijistānīAbū Dāʾūd SulaymānSunan Abī Dāʾūd. 4 vols. Edited by Muḥammad Muḥyī al-Dīn ʿAbd Allah al-Ḥamīd. Cairo: Maṭbaʿa Muṣṭafá Muḥammad, n.d.Google Scholar
al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. al-Šamârîkh fî ʻilm al-ta’rîḫ: Die Dattelrispen über die Wissenschaft der Chronologie … Edited by Seybold, Christian Friedrich. Leiden: E. J.Brill, 1894.Google Scholar
al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. al-Ḥāwī lil-fatāwā fī al-fiqh wa-ʿulūm al-tafsīr wa-al-ḥadīth wa-al-uṣūl wa-al-naḥw wa-al-iʿrāb wa-sāʾir al-funūn. Edited by al-Laṭīf Ḥasan, ʻAbd. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah, 2000.Google Scholar
Tacizade, Saʿdi Çelebi. Fatih devrine ait münşeat mecmuası. Edited by Lugal, Necâti and Erzi, Adnan. Istanbul: İstanbul Matbaası, 1956.Google Scholar
Taşköprizade, Aḥmad ibn Muṣṭafá. Miftāḥ al-saʻādah wa-miṣbāḥ al-siyādah fī mawḍūʻāt al-ʻulūm. Edited by Bakrī, Kāmil and al-Nūr, ʿAbd al-Wahhāb Abū. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Ḥadīthah, 1968.Google Scholar
Taşköprizade, Aḥmad ibn Muṣṭafá. al-Shaqāʾiq al-nuʿmānīyah fī ʿulamāʾ al-Dawlat al-ʿUthmānīyah. Edited by Furat, Ahmed Subhi. Istanbul: Edebiyat Fakültesi Basımevi, 1985.Google Scholar
Tihrani, Abu Bakr. Kitab-ı Diyarbakriyya: Ak-Koyunlar tarihi. 2 vols. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1993.Google Scholar
Tursun Beg, . Târih-i Ebü’l-Feth. İstanbul Fatih Cemiyeti; 74. Istanbul: Baha Matbaası, 1977.Google Scholar
Ṭūsī, Naṣīr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Akhlāq-i Nāṣirī. Edited by Mīnuvī, Mujtabá and Ḥaydarī, ʿAlī Riz̤ā. Tehran: Shirkat-i Sihāmī-i Intishārāt-i Khvārazmī, 1360 [1981].Google Scholar
Ṭūsī, Naṣīr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Edited by Ragep, F. J.. Naṣīr Al-Dīn Al-Ṭūsī’s Memoir on Astronomy = Al-Tadhkira Fī ʻilm Al-Hayʼa, vol. 12. Sources in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences 12. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Vaṣṣāf, ʻAbd Allāh ibn Faz̤l Allāh. Kitāb-i Vaṣṣāf al-Ḥaz̤rat. Edited by Muḥammad Mahdī. Iṣfahānī. Bombay, 1269 [1852–53].Google Scholar
Yazdī, Sharaf al-Dīn ʿAlī. Ẓafarnāma: tārīkh-i ʿumūmī-i mufaṣṣal-i Īrān dar dawra-yi Tīmūrīyān : az rū-yi naskhī kih dar ʿaṣr-i muṣannaf nivishtah shuda. Edited by Abbāsī, Muḥammad. Tehran: Amīr Kabīr, 1336 [1958].Google Scholar
Yazdī, Sharaf al-Dīn ʿAlī. Ẓafarnāma. Edited by Ṣādiq, Sayyid Saʿīd Mīr Muḥammad and Navāʼī, ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn, vol. 2. Tehran: Kitābkhāna Mūzih va Markaz-i Asnād-i Majlis-i Shūra-yi Islāmī, 1387 [2008].Google Scholar
Yazdī, Sharaf al-Dīn ʿAlī. Munshaʾāt-i nivishta-yi Sharaf al-Dīn Yazdī. Edited by Afshār, Īraj. Tehran: Surayyā, 1388 [2009].Google Scholar
Yazıcızâde Ali, . Tevârîh-i âl-i Selçuk: (Oğuznâme-Selçuklu târihi): giriş, metin, dizin. Edited by Bakır, Abdullah. Istanbul: Çamlıca, 2009.Google Scholar
Abi-Mershed, Osama. Apostles of Modernity: Saint-Simonians and the Civilizing Mission in Algeria. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Abou-El-Haj, Rifaʿat Ali. “Aspects of the Legitimation of Ottoman Rule as Reflected in the Preambles to Two Early Liva Kanunnameler,” Turcica 21–3 (1991): 371–83.Google Scholar
Abou-Lughod, Janet. Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250–1350. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Abun-Nasr, Jamil. Muslim Communities of Grace: The Sufi Brotherhoods in Islamic Religious Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Açıkgöz, Mustafa. “II. Bayezid Devri İn‘âmât Defteri (Muharrem-Zi’l-hicce 910/Haziran Mayıs 1504–1505.” M. A., Marmara Üniversitesi, 1996.Google Scholar
Addas, Claude. Quest for the Red Sulphur: The Life of Ibn ʻArabī. Translated by Kingsley, Peter. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 1993.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Shahab. What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Aigle, Denise. “Les transformations d’un mythe d’origine : l’exemple de Gengis Khan et de Tamerlan.” Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée 89–90 (2000): 151–68.Google Scholar
Aigle, Denise. “Les Inscriptions de Baybars Dans Le Bilād Al-Šām. Une Expression de La Légitimité Du Pouvoir.” Studia Islamica 97 (2003): 5785.Google Scholar
Aka, İsmail. İran’da Türkmen hakimiyeti: Kara Koyunlular devri, vol. sa. 191. Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları. VII. dizi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2001.Google Scholar
Akgündüz, Ahmet. Osmanlı Kanunnâmeleri ve Hukuki Tahlilleri. Istanbul: FEY Vakfı, 1990.Google Scholar
Aksan, Virginia. An Ottoman Statesman in War and Peace: Ahmed Resmi Efendi, 1700–1783. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Aksan, Virginia and Goffman, Daniel (eds.). The Early Modern Ottomans: Remapping the Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Alam, Muzaffar. “The Pursuit of Persian: Language in Mughal Politics.” Modern Asian Studies 32, 2 (1998): 317–49.Google Scholar
Alam, Muzaffar. The Languages of Political Islam: India 1200–1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Alam, Muzaffar, and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. “The Making of a Munshi.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle Middle East 24, 2 (2004): 6172.Google Scholar
Al-Azmeh, Aziz. Muslim Kingship: Power and the Sacred in Muslim, Christian, and Pagan Politics. London: I. B. Tauris, 1997.Google Scholar
Algar, Hamid. “Naqshbandīs and Safavids: A Contribution to the Religious History of Iran and Her Neighbors.” In Safavid Iran and Her Neighbors, edited by Mazzaoui, Michel, 748. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Algar, Hamid. Jami. 1st edition. Makers of Islamic Civilization. New Delhi: Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Allouche, Adel. The Origins and Development of the Ottoman-Ṣafavid Conflict (906–962/1500–1555). Berlin: KSchwarz Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar
Alpay, G. K.Lāmīʿī Çelebi and His Works.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 35, 2 (1976): 7393.Google Scholar
Amitai-Preiss, Reuven. “The Fall and Rise of the ʿAbbāsid Caliphate.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 113, 3 (1996): 487–94.Google Scholar
Anay, Harun. “Celaleddin Devvani, Hayatı, Eserleri, Ahlak ve Siyaset Düşüncesi.” Ph.D., İstanbul Üniversitesi, 1994.Google Scholar
Andrade, Tonio. “A Chinese Farmer, Two African Boys, and a Warlord: Toward a Global Microhistory.” Journal of World History 21, 4 (2010): 573–91.Google Scholar
Anjum, Ovamir. Politics, Law, and Community in Islamic Thought: The Taymiyyian Moment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Anooshahr, Ali. The Ghazi Sultans and the Frontiers of Islam: A Comparative Study of the Late Medieval and Early Modern Periods. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Anooshahr, Ali. Turkestan and the Rise of Eurasian Empires: A Study of Politics and Invented Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Antov, Nikolay. The Ottoman Wild West: The Balkan Frontier in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Antrim, Zayde. Routes and Realms: The Power of Place in the Early Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Arat, Reşid Rahmeti. “Fatih Sultan Mehmed’in Yarlığı.” Türkiyat Mecmuası 6 (December 26, 2010): 286322.Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said Amir. The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam: Religion, Political Order, and Societal Change in Shi’ite Iran from the Beginning to 1890. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aslanian, Sebouh David, Joyce E. Chaplin, Ann McGrath, and Mann, Kristin. “AHR Conversation How Size Matters: The Question of Scale in History.” The American Historical Review 118, 5 (2013): 1431–72.Google Scholar
Atçıl, Abdurrahman. “Greco-Islamic Philosophy and Islamic Jurisprudence in the Ottoman Empire (1300–1600): Aristotle’s Theory of Sciences in Works of Uṣūl al-Fiqh.” Osmanlı Araştırmaları/The Journal of Ottoman Studies 41 (2013): 35.Google Scholar
Atçıl, Abdurrahman. Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Atçıl, Abdurrahman. “The Safavid Threat and Juristic Authority in the Ottoman Empire during the 16th Century.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 49 (2017): 295314.Google Scholar
Atçıl, Muhammet Zahit. “State and Government in the Mid-Sixteenth Century Ottoman Vizierates of Rüstem Pasha (1544–1561).” Ph.D., University of Chicago, 2015.Google Scholar
Atiyas, Ekin Tuşalp. “Eloquence in Context: Şabanzade Mehmed Efendi’s (d. 1708–1709) Münazara-ı Ṭıġ u Kalem and ‘The People of the Pen’ in Late Seventeenth-Century Ottoman Empire [sic].” Turcica 48 (2017): 113–55.Google Scholar
Aubin, Jean. “Notes sur quelques documents Aq Qoyunlu (Archives persanes commentés),” in Mélanges Massignon, 139–41. Damascus: Institut français de Damas, 1956.Google Scholar
Aubin, Jean. “Le mécénat timouride a Chiraz.” Studia Islamica, no. 8 (January 1, 1957): 71–88.Google Scholar
Aubin, Jean. “Études safavides I: Šāh Ismāʿīl et les notable de l’Iraq persan.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 2 (1959): 3781.Google Scholar
Aubin, Jean. “L’avènement des Safavides reconsidéré.” Moyen Orient & Océan Indien, XVIe-XIXe s. 5 (1988): 1130.Google Scholar
Aubin, Jean. Emirs mongols et vizirs persans dans les remous de l’acculturation. Paris: Association pour l’avancement des études iraniennes, 1995.Google Scholar
Auer, Blain H. Symbols of Authority in Medieval Islam: History, Religion and Muslim Legitimacy in the Delhi Sultanate. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
Auer, Blain H.Pre-Modern Intellectual Debates on the Knowledge of History and Ẓiyāʾ al-Dīn Baranī’s Tārīkh-i Fīrūzshāhī.” The Indian Economic and Social History Review 52 (2015): 207–23.Google Scholar
Babayan, Kathryn. “The Safavid Synthesis: From Qizilbash Islam to Imamite Shiʿism.” Iranian Studies 27, 1–4 (1994): 135–37.Google Scholar
Babayan, Kathryn. Mystics, Monarchs, and Messiahs: Cultural Landscapes of Early Modern Iran. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Babinger, Franz. Die Geschichtsschreiber der Osmanen und ihre Werke. Leipzig: O. Harrassowitz, 1927.Google Scholar
Babinger, Franz. Mehmed the Conqueror and His Time. Edited by Hickman, William C.. Translated by Manheim, Ralph. 2nd edition for the paperback. Bollingen Series 96. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bacqué-Grammont, Jean-Louis. Les Ottomans, les Safavides et leurs voisins : contribution à l’histoire des relations internationales dans l’orient islamique de 1514 à 1524. Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul, 1987.Google Scholar
Bahār, Muḥammad Taqī. Sabkʹshināsī : Yā tārīkh-i taṭavvur-i nas̲r-i Fārsī, barāya tadrīs dar dānishkadah va dawrah-i dukturī-i adābiyāt, 3 vols. Tehran: Chāpkhāna-yi khudkār, 1321 [1942–43].Google Scholar
Bakhit, Muhammad Adnan. The Ottoman Province of Damascus in the Sixteenth Century. Beirut: Librairie du Liban, 1982.Google Scholar
Balanbanlilar, Lisa. “The Lords of the Auspicious Conjunction: Turco-Mongol Imperial Identity on the Subcontinent.” Journal of World History 8, 1 (2007): 139.Google Scholar
Balivet, Michel. Islam mystique et révolution armée dans les Balkans ottomans: vie du Cheikh Bedreddîn le “Hallâj des Turcs” (1358/59–1416). Istanbul: Editions Isis, 1995.Google Scholar
Banister, Mustafa. “Casting the Caliph in a Cosmic Role: Examining al-Suyūṭī’s Historical Vision.” In Al-Suyūṭī, a Polymath of the Mamlūk Period: Proceedings of the Themed Day of the First Conference of the School of Mamlūk Studies (Ca’Foscari University, Venice, June 23, 2014, edited by Ghersetti, Antonella, 98117. Brill: Leiden, 2017.Google Scholar
Barkan, Ömer Lutfi. “Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda bir İskan ve Kolonizasyon Metodu Olarak Vakıflar ve Temlikler.” Vakıflar Dergisi 2 (1942): 279386.Google Scholar
Barkan, Ömer Lutfi. “H. 933–934 (M. 1527–1528) Mali Yılına âit bir bütçe örneği.” İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası 15 (1954 1953): 251329.Google Scholar
Barkan, Ömer Lutfi. “İstanbul Saraylarına ait Muhasebe Defterleri.” Belgeler 9 (1979): 1380.Google Scholar
Başaran, Orhan. “İdrîs-i Bitlîsî’nin Heşt Bihişt’inin Hâtime’si : Metin-İnceleme-Çeviri.” Ph.D., Atatürk Üniversitesi, 2000.Google Scholar
Başaran, Orhan. “İdrîs-i Bitlisî’nin Şerh-i kasîde-i Hamriyye’si ve iki yazma nüshası.” Nüsha 4 (2004): 713.Google Scholar
Bashir, Shahzad. Messianic Hopes and Mystical Visions: The Nūrbakhshīya between Medieval and Modern Islam. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bashir, Shahzad. Fazlallah Astarabadi and the Hurufis. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2005.Google Scholar
Bashir, Shahzad. Sufi Bodies: Religion and Society in Medieval Islam. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bauden, Frédéric. “The Sons of Al-Nāṣir Muḥammad and the Politics of Puppets: Where Did It All Start?Mamluk Studies Review 8, 1 (2009): 5381.Google Scholar
Bauer, Thomas. “In Search of ‘Post-Classical Literature’: A Review Article.” Mamluk Studies Review 11, 2 (2007): 137–67.Google Scholar
Baykal, Bekir Sıtkı. “Uzun Hasan’ın Osmanlılara karşı katî mücadele hazırlıkları ve Osmanlı Akkoyunlu harbinin başlaması.” Belleten 21 (1957): 261–84.Google Scholar
Beldiceanu, Nicoara. Le Timar dans l’État ottoman. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz, 1980.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor Benite, Zvi, Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Jerr, Nicole (eds.). The Scaffolding of Sovereignty: Global and Aesthetic Perspectives on the History of a Concept. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Bennison, Amira K.Cosmopolitan Expansion and the Fragmentation of Governance.” In The Wiley Blackwell History of Islam, edited by Salvatore, Armando, 117–36. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.Google Scholar
Bernardini, Michele. Memoire et propagande à l’epoque timouride. Paris: Association pour l’avancement des études iraniennes, 2008.Google Scholar
Berkel, Maaike van. “Opening up a World of Knowledge: Mamluk Encyclopaedias.” In Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance, edited by König, Jason and Woolf, Grege, 356–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Binbaş, İlker Evrim. “Sharaf Al-Din ‘Ali Yazdi (ca. 770s–858/ca. 1370s–1454): Prophecy, Politics, and Historiography in Late Medieval Islamic History.” Ph.D., University of Chicago, 2009.Google Scholar
Binbaş, İlker Evrim. “The Anatomy of a Regicide Attempt: Shāhrukh, the Ḥurūfīs, and the Timurid Intellectuals in 830/1426–27.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 23, 3 (2013): 391428.Google Scholar
Binbaş, İlker Evrim. “Timurid Experimentation with Eschatological Absolutism: Mīrzā Iskandar, Shāh Niʿmatullāh Walī, and Sayyid Sharīf Jurjānī in 815/1412.” In Unity in Diversity: Mysticism, Messianism and the Construction of Religious Authority in Islam, edited by Mir-Kasimov, Orkhan, 277303. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Binbaş, İlker Evrim. Intellectual Networks in Timurid Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Binbaş, İlker Evrim. “Condominial Sovereignty and Condominial Messianism in the Timurid Empire: Historiographical and Numismatic Evidence.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 61 (2018): 172202.Google Scholar
Biran, Michal. “The Mongol Transformation: From Steppe to Eurasian Empire.” Medieval Encounters 10, 1–3 (2004): 338–61.Google Scholar
Boyacıoğlu, Ramazan. “Osmanoğullarının Karamanoğlu İbrahim Bey aleyine aldığı Fetvalar.” In Pax Ottomana: Studies in Memoriam, Prof. Dr. Nejat Göyünç, edited by ̧Çiçek, Kemal, 641–57. Ankara: Sota; Yeni Turkiye, 2001.Google Scholar
Brack, Jonathan Z. “Mediating Sacred Kingship: Conversion and Sovereignty in Mongol Iran.” Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, 2016.Google Scholar
Brack, Jonathan Z.“Theologies of Auspicious Kingship: The Islamization of Chinggisid Sacral Kingship in the Islamic World,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 604 (2018): 1143–71.Google Scholar
Broadbridge, Anne F. Kingship and Ideology in the Islamic and Mongol Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bruinessen, Martin van. Agha, Shaikh and State: On the Social and Political Organization of Kurdistan. Utrecht: Rijksuniversiteit, 1978.Google Scholar
Bruinessen, Martin van. “The Ottoman Conquest of Diyarbekir and the Administrative Organization of the Province in the 16th and 17th Centuries.” In Evliya Çelebi in Diyarbekir: The Relevant Section of The Seyahatname, edited by van Bruinessen, Martin and Boeschoten, , 1328. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1988.Google Scholar
Brummett, Palmira. “The Myth of Shah Ismail Safavi: Political Rhetoric and ‘Divine’ Kingship.” In Medieval Christian Perceptions of Islam: A Book of Essays, edited by Tolan, John Victor, 331–59. New York: Garland, 1996.Google Scholar
Buzov, Snjezana. “The Lawgiver and His Lawmakers: The Role of Legal Discourse in the Change of Ottoman Imperial Culture.” Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago, 2005.Google Scholar
Çakar, Enver. “XVI. Yüzyılda Şam Beylerbeyliğinin idarî taksimatı.” Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13, 1 (2003): 351–74.Google Scholar
Çıpa, H. Erdem. The Making of Selim: Succession, Legitimacy, and Memory in the Early Modern Ottoman World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Çıpa, H. Erdem, and Fetvaci, Emine, eds. Writing History at the Ottoman Court: Editing the Past, Fashioning the Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Chann, Naindeep. “Lord of the Auspicious Conjunction: Origins of the Sāhib-qirān.” Iran and the Caucasus 13, 1 (2009): 93110.Google Scholar
Chittick, William C.The Last Will and Testament of Ibn ʿArabi’s Foremost Disciple and Some Notes on Its Author.” Sophia Perennis 4 (1978): 4358.Google Scholar
Chittick, William C.Sadr Al-Din Qunawi on the Oneness of Being.” International Philosophical Quarterly 21, 2 (1981): 171–84.Google Scholar
Chittick, William C. The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn Al-ʿArabi’s Metaphysics of Imagination. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Chittick, William C. Faith and Practice of Islam: Three Thirteenth Century Sufi Texts. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Chodkiewicz, Michel. An Ocean without Shore Ibn ʻArabî, the Book, and the Law. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Chodkiewicz, Michel. “The Esoteric Foundations of Political Legitimacy in Ibn ‘Arabi.” In Muhyiddin Ibn ‘Arabi: A Commemorative Volume, edited by Hirtenstein, Stephen and Tiernan, Michael, 190–98. Shaftesbury: Element, 1993.Google Scholar
Clayer, Natalie. Mystiques, état et société: Les Halvetis dans l’aire balkanique de la fin du XVe siècle à nos jours. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia. God’s Rule: Government and Islam. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Csirkés, Ferenc Péter. “‘Chaghatary Oration, Ottoman Eloquence, Qizilbash Rhetoric’: Turkic Literature in Ṣafavid Persia.” Ph.D., University of Chicago, 2016.Google Scholar
Curry, John. The Transformation of Muslim Mystical Thought in the Ottoman Empire: The Rise of the Halveti Order, 1350–1750. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Curry, John. The Orange Trees of Marrakesh: Ibn Khaldun and the Science of Man. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Daisuke, Igarashi. “The Financial Reforms of Sultan Qāytbāy.” Mamluk Studies Review 13, 1 (2009): 2751.Google Scholar
Daisuke, Igarashi. Land Tenure, Fiscal Policy, and Imperial Power in Medieval Syro-Egypt. Chicago: Middle East Documentation Center, 2015.Google Scholar
Dale, Stephen Frederic. The Muslim Empires of the Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dale, Stephen Frederic. The Orange Trees of Marrakesh: Ibn Khaldun and the Science of Man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Dānishpazhūh, Muḥammad Taqī. “An Annotated Bibliography on Government and Statecraft.” In Authority and Political Culture in Shiʿism, edited by Arjomand, Said Amir, translated by Newman, Andrew, 213–39. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Darling, Linda T.Reformulating the Gazi Narrative. When Was the Ottoman State a Gazi State.” Turcica 43 (2011): 1353.Google Scholar
Darling, Linda T. A History of Social Justice and Political Power in the Middle East. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Davis, Natalie Zemon. Trickster Travels: A Sixteenth-Century Muslim between Worlds. New York: Hill and Wang, 2006.Google Scholar
DeWeese, Devin. “The Eclipse of the Kubravīyah in Central Asia.” Iranian Studies 21, 1/2 (1988): 4583.Google Scholar
DeWeese, Devin. “Spiritual Practice and Corporate Identity in Medieval Sufi Communities of Iran, Central Asia, and India: The Khalvatī/ʿIshqī/Shaṭṭārī Continuum.” In Religion and Identity in South Asia and Beyond: Essays in Honor of Patrick Olivelle, edited by Lindquist, Steven E., 251300. London: Anthem Press, 2011.Google Scholar
DeWeese, Devin. “Intercessory Claims of Ṣūfī Communities during the 14th and 15th Centuries: ‘Messianic’ Legitimizing Strategies on the Spectrum of Normativity.” In Unity in Diversity: Mysticism, Messianism and the Construction of Religious Authority in Islam, edited by Mir-Kasimov, Orkhan, 197219. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Dickson, Martin. “Uzbek Dynastic Theory in the Sixteenth Century.” In Trudy dvadtsat’ piatogo mezhdunaraodnogo kongressa vostokovedov 3. Moscow: Izd-vo Vostochnoi Literatury, 1963.Google Scholar
Digby, Simon. “The Sufi Shaykh and the Sultan: A Conflict of Claims to Authority in Medieval India.” Iran 28 (1990): 7181.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung älterer neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor allem der Mongolen- und Timuridenzeit, 4 vols. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1963.Google Scholar
Donohue, John. The Buwayhid Dynasty in Iraq. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
Eaton, Richard M., and Adas, Michael. “Islamic History as Global History.” In Islamic & European Expansion: The Forging of a Global Order, 136. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Emecen, Feridun M. İlk Osmanlılar ve Batı Anadolu Beylikler Dünyası. Cağaloğlu, İstanbul: Kitabevi, 2001.Google Scholar
Emecen, Feridun M. Yavuz Sultan Selim. Istanbul: Yitik Hazine Yayınları, 2011.Google Scholar
Emre, Side. Ibrahim-i Gulshani and the Khalwati-Gulshani Order: Power Brokers in Ottoman Egypt. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard, and Filali-Ansary, Abdou. Organizing Knowledge: Encyclopaedic Activities in the Pre-Eighteenth Century Islamic World. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Eren, Kutlukhan. “Basîrî ve Dîvânının Tenkidli Metni (Meḥmed b. Aḥmed b. Ebū’l-Meʿâlî el-Murtażâ).” M.A., İstanbul Üniversitesi, 1999.Google Scholar
Erünsal, İsmail. “Türk Edebiyatı Tarihinin Arşiv Kaynakları I: II. Bâyezid devrine ait bir in‘âmât defteri.” Tarih Entsitüsü Dergisi X–XI (1980 1979): 303–42.Google Scholar
Erzi, Adnan Sadık. “Akkoyunlu ve Karakoyunlu Tarihi Hakkında Araştırmaları.” Belleten 18 (1954): 179221.Google Scholar
Fallahzadeh, Mehrdad. “The Eight Paradises (the Hasht Bihisht) and the Question of the Existence of Its Autographs.” Der Islam 91, 2 (2014): 374409.Google Scholar
Fekete, Lajos. Einführung in die persische Paläographie: 101 persische Dokumente. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1977.Google Scholar
Fetvacı, Emine. Picturing History at the Ottoman Court. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Cornell. “Royal Authority, Dynastic Cyclism, and ‘Ibn Khaldûnism’ in Sixteenth-Century Ottoman Letters.” In Ibn Khaldun and Islamic Ideology, edited by Lawrence, Bruce, 4668. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1984.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Cornell. Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire: The Historian Mustafa Âli (1541-1600). Princeton Studies on the Near East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Cornell. “The Lawgiver as Messiah: The Making of the Imperial Image in the Reign of Süleyman.” In Soliman Le Magnifique et Son Temps, Actes Du Colloque de Paris. Galeries Nationales Du Gran Palais, 7-10 Mars 1990, edited by Veinstein, Gilles, 159–77. Paris: La Documentation Française, 1992.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Cornell. “Mahdi and Millenium: Messianic Dimensions in the Development of Ottoman Imperial Ideology.” In The Great Ottoman-Turkish Civilization, Vol. 3: Philosophy, Science, and Institutions, edited by Çiçek, Kemal, 4254. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye, 2000.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Cornell. “Shadow of Shadows: Prophecy and Politics in 1530s Istanbul.” International Journal of Turkish Studies 13, 1–2 (2007): 5162.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Cornell. “Ancient Wisdom and New Science: Prophecies at the Ottoman Court in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries.” In Falnama: The Book of Omens, edited by Farhad, Massumeh and Baǧcı, Serpil, 232–43, 329–30. London: Thames and Hudson, 2009.Google Scholar
Flemming, Barbara. “Šerīf, Sultan Ġavrī und die ‘Perser’.” Der Islam 45 (1969): 8193.Google Scholar
Flemming, Barbara. “Literary Activities in Mamluk Halls and Barracks.” In Studies in Memory of Gaston Wiet, edited by Rosen-Ayalon, Myriam, 249–60. Jerusalem: Institute of Asian and African Studies, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1977.Google Scholar
Flemming, Barbara. “Political Genealogies in the Sixteenth Century.” Journal of Ottoman Studies 7–8 (1988): 123–37.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Joseph. “Turko-Mongolian Monarchic Tradition in the Ottoman Empire.” Harvard Journal of Ukrainian Studies 3–4, 1 (1979–80): 236–51.Google Scholar
Floor, Willem M. Safavid Government Institutions. Costa MesaCA: Mazda Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
Genç, Vural. “İdris-i Bitlisî: Heşt Bihişt Osman Gazi Dönemi (Tahlil ve Tercüme).” Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi, 2007.Google Scholar
Genç, Vural. “‘Acem’den Rum’a’: İdris-i Bidlîsî’nin Hayatı, Tarihçiliği ve Heşt Behişt’in II. Bayezid Kısmı (1481–1512).” Ph.D., İstanbul Üniversitesi, 2014.Google Scholar
Genç, Vural. “Şah ile Sultan arasında bir Acem Bürokratı: İdrîs-i Bidlîsî’nin Şah İsmail’in Himayesine Girme Çabası.” Osmanlı Araştırmaları 46 (2015): 4374.Google Scholar
Ghobrial, John-Paul A.The Secret Life of Elias of Babylon and the Uses of Global Microhistory.” Past and Present 222, 1 (2014): 5193.Google Scholar
Gibb, H. A. R.Al-Mawardi’s Theory of the Khilafah.” In Studies on the Civilization of Islam, edited by Shaw, Stanford J. and Polk, William R., 151–65. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Gibb, H. A. R.Luṭfī Paşa on the Ottoman Caliphate.” Oriens 15 (1962): 287–95.Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B.Imperial Ideology and the Sources of Political Unity among the Pre-Chinggisid Nomads of Western Eurasia.” Archivum Eurasie Medii Aevi 2 (1982): 3777.Google Scholar
Göyünç, Necat. “Das sogenannte Gāme’ o’l-Hesāb des ’Emād assarāwī: Ein Leitf. d. staatl. Rechnungswesens v. ca. 1340.” Ph.D., University of Göttingen, 1962.Google Scholar
Göyünç, Necat. XVI. yüzyılda Mardin Sancağı. Istanbul: Edebiyat Fakültesi Basımevi, 1969.Google Scholar
Green, Nile. Sufism: A Global History. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Grunebaum, Gustave E. von. Medieval Islam; a Study in Cultural Orientation. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Hagen, Gottfried, and Menchinger, Ethan L., “Ottoman Historical Thought.” In A Companion to Global Historical Thought, edited by Duara, Prasenjit, Murthy, Viren, and Sartori, Andrew, 92106. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar
Hammer-Purgstall, Joseph von. Geschichte der Osmanischen Reiches. Pest: C. A. Hartleben’s Verlage, 1827.Google Scholar
Har-El, Shai. Struggle for Domination in the Middle East: The Ottoman-Mamluk War, 1485–1491. New York: E. J. Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Hassan, Mona. Longing for the Lost Caliphate: A Transregional History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, Carole. “Rāvandi, the Seljuk Court at Konya and Persianisation of Anatolian Cities.” Mesogeios (Mediterranean Studies) 25–26 (2005): 157–69.Google Scholar
Hinz, Walther. “Ein orientalisches Handelsunternehmen im 15. Jahrhundert.” Die Welt des Orients 1, 4 (January 1, 1950): 313–40.Google Scholar
Hinz, Walther. “Die Persische Geheimkanzlei im Mittelalter.” In FS Rudolf Tschudi, 342–55, 1954.Google Scholar
Hirschler, Konrad. “Islam: The Arabic and Persian Traditions, Eleventh-Fifteenth Centuries.” In The Oxford History of Historical Writing. Volume 3, 1400–1800, edited by Rabasa, José, 267–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Marshall G. S. The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization, 3 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Valerie. “Annihilation in the Messenger of God: The Development of a Sufi Practice.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 31 (1999), 352.Google Scholar
Holt, Peter. “Some Observations on the ʿAbbāsid Caliphate of Cairo.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 47, 3 (1984): 501–7.Google Scholar
Holt, Peter. “Literary Offerings: A Genre of Courtly Literature.” In The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society, edited by Philipp, Thomas and Haarmann, Ulrich, 316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
İlhan, M. Mehdi. Amid (Diyarbakır): 1518 Detailed Register. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 2000.Google Scholar
Imazawa, Koji. “İdris Bitlisî’nin Heşt Bihişt’inin Iki Tip Nüshası Üzerine Bir Inceleme.” Belleten 69 (2005): 859–96.Google Scholar
Imber, Colin. “The Ottoman Dynastic Myth.” Turcica 19 (1987): 727.Google Scholar
Imber, Colin. “Ideals and Legitimation in Early Ottoman History.” In Süleyman the Magnificent and His Age: The Ottoman Empire in the Early Modern World, edited by Kunt, Metin and Woodhead, Christine, 138–53. New York: Longman, 1995.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. “Osmanlılar’da Saltanat Veraseti Usulü ve Türk Hâkimiyet Telâkkisiyle İlgisi.” Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi 14, 1 (1959): 6994.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. “Mehmed the Conqueror (1432–1481) and his Time,” Speculum 35, 3 (1960): 408–27.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. The Rise of Ottoman Historiography.” In Historians of the Middle East, edited by Holt, P. M. and Lewis, Bernard, 152–67. London: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. “Tursun Beg, Historian of Mehmed the Conqueror’s Time.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 69 (1977): 5571.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. “The Status of the Greek Orthodox Patriarch under the Ottomans.” Turcica 21–3 (1991): 407–36.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. “Islamization of Ottoman Laws on Land Tax.” In Festgabe an Josef Matuz: Osmanistik-Turkologie-Diplomatik, edited by Fragner, Christa and Schwarz, Klaus, 100–16. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. Şair ve Patron: Patrimonyal devlet ve sanat üzerind sosyolojik bir inceleme. Ankara: Doğu Batı, 2003.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. “Autonomous Enclaves in Islamic States: Temlîks, Soyurghals, Yordluḳs-Ocaḳlıḳs, Mâlikâne-Muḳâṭaʿas and Awqāfs.” In History and Historiography of Post-Mongol Central Asia and the Middle East: Studies in Honor of John E. Woods, edited by Pfeiffer, Judith and Quinn, Sholeh Alysia, 112–34. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2006.Google Scholar
İnan, A. K. Makaleler ve İncelemeler. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1969.Google Scholar
İpekten, Halûk. Divan edebiyatinda edebî muhitler. Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi, 1996.Google Scholar
Irwin, Robert. “The Political Thinking of the ‘Virtuous Ruler,’ Qānṣūh Al-Ghawrī.” Mamluk Studies Review 12, 1 (2006): 3749.Google Scholar
Isom-Verhaaren, Christine and Schull, Kent F. (eds.). Living in the Ottoman Realm: Empire and Identity, 13th to 20th Centuries. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2016,Google Scholar
Jackson, Peter A. The Delhi Sultanate : A Political and Military History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kadi, Wadad. “The Religious Foundation of Late Umayyad Ideology and Practice.” In Sober Religioso y Poder Politico en el Islam, edited by Martin, Manuela, 231–73. Madrid: Agencia Espanola de Cooperación Internacional [Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas], 1994.Google Scholar
Kafadar, Cemal. Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kara, Mustafa. “XIV. ve XV. Yüzyıllarda Osmanlı Tolumunu Besleyen Türkçe Kitaplar.” Uludaǧ Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 8, 8 (1999): 2958.Google Scholar
Karamustafa, Ahmet. God’s Unruly Friends: Dervish Groups in the Islamic Middle Periods, 1200–1550. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Karataş, Hasan. “The City as a Historical Actor: The Urbanization and Ottomanization of the Halvetiye Sufi Order by the City of Amasya in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries.” Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley, 2011.Google Scholar
Kastritsis, Dimitris J. The Sons of Bayezid: Empire Building and Representation in the Ottoman Civil War of 1402–1413. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Kaytaz, Fatma. “Behiştî Tarihi (797–907/1389–1502) (Giriş, Metin, Dizin).” Ph.D., Marmara Üniversitesi, 2011.Google Scholar
Kazan, Hilal. “XV. ve XVI. Asırlarda Osmanlı Sarayının Sanatı Himayesi.” Ph.D., Marmara Üniversitesi, 2007.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Hugh. The Prophet Muhammad and the Age of the Caliphates. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 1986.Google Scholar
Khalidi, Tarif. Arabic Historical Thought in the Classical Period. Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Khalidi, TarifPremodern Arabic/Islamic Historical Writing.” In Companion to Global Historical Thought, edited by Duara Prasenjit, Viren Murthy, and Andrew Sartori, 7891. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar
Kim, Sooyong. The Last of an Age: The Making and Unmaking of a Sixteenth-Century Ottoman Poet. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Kırlangıç, Hicabi. “İdrîs-i Bidlîsî: Selim Şâhnâme.” Ph.D., Ankara Üniversitesi, 1995.Google Scholar
Kunt, İ Metin. “Introduction: State and Sultan up to the Age of Süleyman.” In Süleyman the Magnificent and His Age: The Ottoman Empire in the Early Modern World, edited by Kunt, İ Metin and Woodhead, Christine, 329. London: Longman, 1995.Google Scholar
Kütükoğlu, Mübahat S. Osmanlı Belgelerinin Dili: Diplomatik. Istanbul: Kubbealtı Akademisi Kültür ve San’at Vakfı, 1994.Google Scholar
Lambton, Ann K. S. State and Government in Medieval Islam: An Introduction to the Study of Islamic Political Theory: The Jurists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Landau-Tasseron, Ella. “The ‘Cyclical Reform’: A Study of the Mujaddid Tradition.” Studia Islamica 70 (1989): 79117.Google Scholar
Lellouch, Benjamin. Les Ottomans en Egypte: historiens et conquérants au XVIe siècle. Louvain: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar
Lellouch, Benjamin. “La politique mamlouke de Selīm Ier.” In La Conquête ottomane de l’Égypte (1517): Arrière-plan, impact, échos, edited by Lellouch, Benjamin and Michel, Nicolas, 165210. Boston, Leide: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Lellouch, Benjamin, and Yerasimos, Stefanos. Les traditions apocalyptiques au tournant de la chute de Constantinople: Actes de la Table ronde d’Istanbul, 13-14 avril 1996. Paris: Harmattan, 2000.Google Scholar
Lepore, Jill. “Historians Who Love Too Much: Reflections on Microhistory and Biography.” The Journal of American History 88, vol. 1 (2001): 129–44.Google Scholar
Levanoni, Amalia. A Turning Point in Mamluk History: The Third Reign of Al-Nāṣir Muḥammad Ibn Qalāwūn (1310–1341). Leiden: Brill, 1995,Google Scholar
Levend, Agâh Sırrı. Ġazavāt-Nāmeler ve Mihaloğlu Ali Bey’in Ġazavāt-Nāmesi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1956.Google Scholar
Levi, Giovanni. “The Uses of Biography.” In Theoretical Discussions of Biography: Approaches from History, Microhistory and Life Writing, edited by Renders, Hans and de Haan, Binne, Revised and augmented edition, 6174. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Lewis, Franklin. “Sincerely Flattering Panegyrics: The Shrinking Ghaznavid Qasida.” In The Necklace of the Pleiades: Studies in Persian Literature Presented to Heshmat Moayyad on His 80th Birthday: 24 Essays on Persian Literature, Culture and Religion, edited by Lewis, Franklin, Sharma, Sunil, and Moayyad, Heshmat, 209–50. Iranian Studies Series. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey L.The Utility of the Ottoman Fethnames.” In Historians of the Middle East, edited by Lewis, Bernard and Holt, P. M., 192–96. London: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Limbert, John W. Shiraz in the Age of Hafez: The Glory of a Medieval Persian City. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lingwood, Chad G. Politics, Poetry, and Sufism in Medieval Iran: New Perspectives on Jāmī’s Salāmān va Absāl. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Losensky, Paul E. Welcoming Fighānī: Imitation and Poetic Individuality in the Safavid-Mughal Ghazal. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. Ibn Khaldūn’s Philosophy of History: A Study in the Philosophic Foundation of the Science of Culture. London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1957.Google Scholar
Eiji, Mano. “Amir Timur Kuragan – Timur ke no keifu to Timur no tachiba.” Toyosho-Kenkyu 34, 4 (1976): 591615.Google Scholar
Manz, Beatrice Forbes. “Tamerlane and the Symbolism of Sovereignty.” Iranian Studies 21, 1/2 (January 1, 1988): 105–22.Google Scholar
Manz, Beatrice Forbes. The Rise and Rule of Tamerlane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Manz, Beatrice Forbes. “Tamerlane’s Career and Its Uses.” Journal of World History 13, 1 (2002): 126.Google Scholar
Manz, Beatrice Forbes. Power, Politics and Religion in Timurid Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Markiewicz, Christopher. “The Crisis of Rule in Late Medieval Islam: A Study of Idrīs Bidlīsī and Kingship at the Turn of the Sixteenth Century.” Ph.D., University of Chicago, 2015.Google Scholar
Markiewicz, Christopher, “History as Science: The Fifteenth-Century Debate in Arabic and Persian.” JEMH 21 (2017): 216–40.Google Scholar
Markiewicz, Christopher, “Europeanist Trends and Islamic Trajectories in Early Modern Ottoman History.” Past & Present 239 (2018): 265–81.Google Scholar
Markiewicz, Christopher. “Secretaries and the Persian Cosmopolis in the Making of an Anti-Safavid Diplomatic Discourse.” In Diplomatic Culture at the Ottoman Court (c. 1500–1600), edited by Markiewicz, Christopher and Sowerby, Tracey (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Martin, B. G.Seven Safawid Documents from Azarbayjan.” In Documents from Islamic Chanceries, edited by Stern, S. M., 171–206. Oriental Studies 3. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Mauder, Christian. “Herrschaftsbegründung durch Handlung. ʿAbd al-Bāsiṭ al-Malaṭīs (st. 1514 in Kairo), al-Mağmūʿ al-bustān an-nawrī , (‘Die erblühende Gartensammlung’),” Das Mittelalter 20, 1 (2015): 2946.Google Scholar
Mauder, Christian. “In the Sultan’s Salon: Learning, Religion, and Rulership at the Mamluk Court of Qāniṣawh al-Ghawrī (r. 1501–1516).” Ph.D., University of Göttingen, 2017.Google Scholar
Mazzaoui, Michel. The Origins of the Safawids, Shiʿism, and the Ghulat. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1972.Google Scholar
McChesney, Robert. Waqf in Central Asia: Four Hundred Years in the History of a Muslim Shrine, 1480–1889. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
McChesney, Robert. “The Chinggisid Restoration in Central Asia, 1500–1785.” In The Cambridge History of Inner Asia: – The Chinggisid Age, edited by di Cosmo, Nicola, Frank, Allen J., and Golden, Peter B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 277–91.Google Scholar
Menchinger, Ethan L. The First of the Modern Ottomans: The Intellectual History of Ahmed Vasif. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Meisami, Julie Scott. Medieval Persian Court Poetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Meisami, Julie Scott. “Rāvandī’s Rāḥat Al-Ṣudūr: History or Hybrid?Edebiyat 5 (1994): 181215.Google Scholar
Meisami, Julie Scott. Persian Historiography to the End of the Twelfth Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Meisami, Julie Scott. “History as Literature.” In Persian Historiography, edited by Melville, Charles, 155. A History of Persian Literature, vol. X. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
Melikian-Chivani, A. S.The Iranian Bazm in Early Persian Sources.” In Banquets d’Orient, edited by Bernus-Taylor, Rika and Bernus-Taylor, Bernus-Taylor, 95118. Bures-sur-Yvette: Groupe pour l’étude de la civilisation du Moyen-Orient, 1992.Google Scholar
Melikoff, Irène. “L’Heterodoxe en Anatolie: non-conformisme–syncrétisme–gnose.” Turcica 14 (1982): 141–54.Google Scholar
Meloy, John Lash. Imperial Power and Maritime Trade: Mecca and Cairo in the Later Middle Ages. Chicago: Published by the Middle East Documentation Center on behalf of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, University of Chicago, 2010.Google Scholar
Melville, Charles. “The Historian at Work.” In Persian Historiography, edited by Melville, Charles, 56100. A History of Persian Literature, vol. X. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
Melville, Charles. Persian Historiography, vol. 10. A History of Persian Literature. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The Delicate Art of Aggression: Uzun Hasan’s Fathnama to Qaytbay of 1469.” Iranian Studies 44, 2 (2011): 193214.Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The Quest for a Universal Science: The Occult Philosophy of Ṣāʾin Al-Dīn Turka Iṣfahānī (1369–1432) and Intellectual Millenarianism in Early Timurid Iran.” Ph.D., Yale University, 2012.Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The Occult Challenge to Messianism and Philosophy in Early Timurid Iran: Ibn Turka’s Lettrism as a New Metaphysics.” In Unity in Diversity: Mysticism, Messianism and the Construction of Religious Authority in Islam, edited by Mir-Kasimov, Orkhan, 247–76. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Early Modern Islamicate Empire.” In The Wiley Blackwell History of Islam, edited by Salvatore, Armando, 351–75. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.Google Scholar
Ménage, Victor. “A Survey of the Early Ottoman Histories, with Studies on Their Textual Problems and Their Sources.” Ph.D., University of London (SOAS), 1961.Google Scholar
Ménage, Victor. “The Beginnings of Ottoman Historiography.” In Historians of the Middle East, edited by Holt, P. M. and Lewis, Bernard, 168–79. London: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Ménage, Victor. Neshrī’s History of the Ottomans: The Sources and Development of the Text. London: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Mengüç, Murat Cem. “A Study of 15th-Century Ottoman Historiography,” D.Phil., University of Cambridge, 2008, 230–31.Google Scholar
Mengüç, Murat Cem. “Histories of Bayezid I, Historians of Bayezid II: Rethinking Late Fifteenth-Century Ottoman Historiography.” BSOAS 76, 3 (2013): 389Google Scholar
Minorsky, Vladimir. “A Civil and Military Review in Fārs in 881/1476.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 10, 1 (1939): 141–78.Google Scholar
Minorsky, Vladimir. “A Soyurghal of Qasim Aq-Qoyunlu (903/1498).” Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London IX, 4 (1939): 927–60.Google Scholar
Minorsky, Vladimir. “The Poetry of Shah Ismail I.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 10, no. 4 (1942): 1006–53.Google Scholar
Minorsky, Vladimir. “The Aq-Qoyunlu and Land Reforms.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 17, 3 (January 1, 1955): 449–62.Google Scholar
Minovi, Mojtaba, and Minorsky, Vladimir. “Naṣīr Al-Dīn Ṭūsī on Finance.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 10, 3 (1940): 755–89.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Colin. “Safavid Imperial Tarassul and the Persian Insha Tradition.” Studia Iranica 26, 2 (1997): 173209.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Colin. “To Preserve and Protect: Husayn Va’iz-i Kashifi and Perso-Islamic Chancellery Culture.” Iranian Studies 36, 4 (2003): 485507.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Colin. The Practice of Politics in Safavid Iran: Power, Religion and Rhetoric. Tauris, I. B. & BIPS Persian Studies Series. London: I. B. Tauris, 2009.Google Scholar
Moin, A. Azfar. The Millennial Sovereign: Sacred Kingship and Sainthood in Islam. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Molé, Marijan. “Les kubrawiya entre sunnisme et shi’isme.” Revue des Etudes Islamiques 29 (1961): 61142.Google Scholar
Molé, Marijan. “Profession de foi de deux Kubrawis: ‘Alī Hamadānī et Muhammad Nūrbakhsh.” Bulletin D’études Orientales 17 (1962 1961): 133204.Google Scholar
Moutafchieva, Vera. Agrarian Relations in the Ottoman Empire in the 15th and 16th Centuries. Boulder, CO: Eastern European Monographs, 1988.Google Scholar
Muhanna, Elias. “Why Was the Fourteenth Century a Century of Arabic Encyclopaedism?” In Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance, edited by König, Jason and Woolf, , 343–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Muhanna, Elias. “The World in a Book: al-Nuwayri and the Islamic Encyclopedic Tradition” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Murphey, Rhoads. Exploring Ottoman Sovereignty: Tradition, Image, and Practice in the Ottoman Imperial Household, 1400–1800. London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
Muslu, Cihan Yüksel. The Ottomans and the Mamluks: Imperial Diplomacy and Warfare in the Islamic World. London: I. B. Tauris, 2014.Google Scholar
Necipoğlu, Gülru. “Süleyman the Magnificent and the Representation of Power in the Context of the Ottoman-Habsburg-Papal Rivalry.” The Art Bulletin 71, 3 (1989): 401–27.Google Scholar
Necipoğlu, Gülru. Architecture, Ceremonial, and Power: The Topkapi Palace in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries. New York: Architectural History Foundation, 1991.Google Scholar
Necipoğlu, Gülru. “A Kânûn for the State a Canon for the Arts: Conceptualizing the Classical Synthesis of Ottoman Art and Architecture.” In Soliman le Magnifique et son temps, edited by Veinstein, Gilles, 194216. Paris: Documentation Française, 1992.Google Scholar
Norton, Claire. “Iconographs of Power or Tools of Diplomacy: Ottoman Fethnames.” Journal of Early Modern History 20 (2016): 331–50.Google Scholar
Nizami, Khaliq Ahmad. On History and Historians of Medieval India. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1983.Google Scholar
Ocak, Ahmet Yaşar. Osmanlı Toplumunda Zındıklar ve Mülhidler, Expanded Edition. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yur Yayınları, 2013.Google Scholar
Ökten, Ertuğrul. “Jāmī (817–898/1414–1492): His Biography and Intellectual Influence in Herat.” Ph.D., University of Chicago, 2007.Google Scholar
Ökten, Ertuğrul. “Scholars and Mobility: A Preliminary Assessment from the Perspective of al-Shaqāyiq al-Nu‘māniyya.” Journal of Ottoman Studies 41 (2013): 5570.Google Scholar
Orfali, Bilal. The Anthologist’s Art: Abū Manṣūr al-Thaʿālibī and His Yatīmat al-dahr. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Özel, Oktay. “Limits of the Almighty: Mehmed II’s ‘Land Reform’ Revisited.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 42, 2 (1999): 226–46.Google Scholar
Pamuk, Şevket. A Monetary History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Papademetriou, Tom. Render unto the Sultan: Power, Authority, and the Greek Orthodox Church in the Early Ottoman Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Paul, Jürgen. “Scheiche und Herrscher in Khanat Čaġatay.” Der Islam 67, 2 (1990): 270321.Google Scholar
Peirce, Leslie Penn. The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire. Studies in Middle Eastern History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Peirce, Leslie Penn. Morality Tales: Law and Gender in the Ottoman Court of Aintab. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Petrushevskii, I. P.Vnutrenniaia politika Akhmeda Ak-Koiunlu.” In Sbornik statei po istorii Azerbaidzhana, I (Baku, 1949):144–52.Google Scholar
Petry, Carl F. Twilight of Majesty: The Reigns of the Mamlūk Sultans Al-Ashrāf Qāytbāy and Qanṣūh Al-Ghawrī in Egypt. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Petry, Carl F. Protectors or Praetorians? The Last Mamluk Sultans and Egypt’s Waning as a Great Power. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Judith. “Conversion to Islam among the Ilkhans in Muslim Narrative Traditions: The Case of Aḥmad Teguder.” Ph.D., The University of Chicago, 2003.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Judith. “Confessional Ambiguity vs. Confessional Polarization: Politics and the Negotiation of Religious Boundaries in the Ilkhanate.” In Politics, Patronage, and the Transmission of Knowledge in 13th–15th Century Tabriz, edited by Pfeiffer, Judith, 129–68. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Judith. Politics, Patronage, and the Transmission of Knowledge in 13th–15th Century Tabriz, vol. 8. Iran Studies. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Pingree, David. “Hellenophilia versus the History of Science.” ISIS 83 (1992): 554–63.Google Scholar
Piterberg, Gabriel. An Ottoman Tragedy: History and Historiography at Play. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Poliakova, Elena A.Timur as Described by the 15th Century Court Historiographers.” Iranian Studies 21, no. 1/2 (1988): 3144.Google Scholar
Potter, Lawrence. “Sufis and Sultans in Post-Mongol Iran.” Iranian Studies 27, 1 (1994): 77102.Google Scholar
Pourjavady, Reza. Philosophy in Early Safavid Iran Najm Al-Dīn Maḥmūd Al-Nayrīzī and His Writings. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Quinn, Sholeh Alysia. Historical Writing During the Reign of Shah ʻAbbas: Ideology, Imitation, and Legitimacy in Safavid Chronicles. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Quinn, Sholeh Alysia. “The Timurid Historiographical Legacy: A Comparative Study of Persianate Historical Writing.” In Society and Culture in the Early Modern Middle East: Studies on Iran in the Safavid Period, edited by Newman, Andrew J., 19–. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
Quinn, Sholeh Alysia. “Safavid Historiography.” In Persian Historiography, edited by Melville, Charles, 209–57. A History of Persian Literature, vol. 10. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
Reindl, Hedda. Männer um Bāyezīd: eine prosopographische Studie über die Epoche Sultan Bāyezīds II. (1481–1512), vol. 75. Islamkundliche Untersuchungen. Berlin: K. Schwarz, 1983.Google Scholar
Repp, Richard Cooper. The Müfti of Istanbul: A Study in the Development of the Ottoman Learned Hierarchy. London: Published by Ithaca Press London for the Board of the Faculty of Oriental Studies, Oxford University, 1986.Google Scholar
Richard, Francis. “Un témoignage inexploité concernant le mécénat d’Eskandar Solṭān à Eṣfahān.” Oriente Moderno n.s. 15 (1996): 4572.Google Scholar
Riedel, Dagmar. “Searching for the Islamic Episteme: The Status of Historical Information in Medieval Middle-Eastern Anthological Writing.” Ph.D., Indiana University, 2004.Google Scholar
Robinson, Chase F. Islamic Historiography. Themes in Islamic History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. A History of Muslim Historiography. 2nd revised edition. Leiden: Brill, 1968.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I.Science and Philosophy in Medieval Islamic Theology: The Evidence from the Fourteenth Century.” Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabischen-Islamischen Wissenschaften 9 (1994): 143.Google Scholar
Şahin, Kaya. “Constantinople and the End Time: The Ottoman Conquest as a Portent of the Last Hour.” Journal of Early Modern History 14, 4 (2010): 317–54.Google Scholar
Şahin, Kaya. Empire and Power in the Reign of Süleyman: Narrating the Sixteenth-Century Ottoman World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Salvatore, Armando, Arnason, Johann P., Rahimi, Babak, and Totoli, Roberto, “Introduction: The Formation and Transformations of the Islamic Ecumene.” In The Wiley Blackwell History of Islam, edited by Salvatore, Armando et al., 135. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2018.Google Scholar
Sariyannis, Marinos. A History of Ottoman Political Thought up to the Early Nineteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Sartain, E. M. Jalāl Al-Dīn Al-Suyūṭī: Biography and Background, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Savory, Roger M.The Struggle for Supremacy in Persia after the Death of Tīmūr.” Der Islam 40 (1964): 3565.Google Scholar
Savory, Roger M.The Consolidation of Ṣafawid Power in Persia.” Der Islam 41 (1965): 7194.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jan. Pure Water for Thirsty Muslims: A Study of Muṣṭafā ʿĀlī of Gallipoli’s Künhüʾl-aḫbār. Leiden: Het Oosters Instituut, 1991.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jan. “The Reception of Firdausi’s Shahnama among the Ottomans.” In Shahnama Studies II the Reception of Firdausi’s Shahnama, edited by Melville, C. P. and Van den Berg, Gabrielle Rachel, vol. 2, 119–39. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Semenov, A. A.Nadpisi na nadgrobiyakh Timura i ego potomkov v Gur-i Emire.” Epigrafika Vostoka 2, 3 (1948): 4962, (1949): 45–54.Google Scholar
Şen, Ahmet Tunç. “Astrology in the Service of the Empire: Knowledge, Prognostication, and Politics at the Ottoman Court, 1450s–1550s.” Ph.D., University of Chicago, 2016.Google Scholar
Şen, Ahmet Tunç. “Reading the Stars at the Ottoman Court of Bayezid II (r.886/1481–918/1512) and his Celestial Interests.” Arabica 64 (2017): 577–82.Google Scholar
Sewell, Victoria E.The Concept(s) of Culture.” In Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, edited by Bonnell, Victoria E., Hunt, Lynn, and Biernacki, Richard, 3561. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Shukurov, Rustam. “The Campaign of Shaykh Djunayd Safawi against Trebizond (1456 AD/860 AH).” Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 17 (1993): 127–40.Google Scholar
Smith, John Masson. Der The History of the Sarbadār Dynasty, 1336–1381 A.D. and Its Sources. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.Google Scholar
Sohrweide, Hanna. “Dichter Und Gelehrte Aus Dem Osten Im Osmanischen Reich (1453–1600).” Der Islam 46 (1970): 263302.Google Scholar
Sönmez, Ebru. “An Acem Statesman in the Ottoman Court: İdris-I Bidlîsî and the Making of Ottoman Policy on Iran.” M. A., Boğaziçi University, 2006.Google Scholar
Sönmez, Ebru. Idris-i Bidlisi: Ottoman Kurdistan and Islamic Legitimacy. Libra Kitap ve Yayınları, 2012.Google Scholar
Soucek, Priscilla P.Eskandar B.’Omar Šayx B. Timur: A Biography.” Oriente Moderno, ns, 15 (76), 2 (January 1, 1996): 7387.Google Scholar
Spence, Jonathan D. The Question of Hu. 1st edition. New York: Knopf, 1988.Google Scholar
Stavrides, Theoharis. The Sultan of Vezirs: The Life and Times of the Ottoman Grand Vezir Mahmud Pasha Angelovic (1453–1474). Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Stearns, Justin. “Public Health, the State, and Religious Scholarship: Sovereignty in Idrīs al-Bidlīsī’s Arguments for Fleeing the Plague.” In The Scaffolding of Sovereignty, edited by Benite, Zvi Ben-Dor, Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Jerr, Nicole, 163–85. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Storey, C. A. (Ambrose, Charles). Persian Literature: A Bio-Bibliographical Survey. London: Luzac, 1927.Google Scholar
Struck, Bernhard, Ferris, Kate, and Revel, Jacques. “Introduction: Space and Scale in Transnational History.” The International History Review 33, 4 (2011): 573–84.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. “Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia.” Modern Asian Studies 31, 3 (1997): 735–62.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. “Turning the Stones Over: Sixteenth-Century Millenarianism from the Tagus to the Ganges.” Indian Economic & Social History Review 40, 2 (2003): 129–61.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. Three Ways to Be Alien: Travails & Encounters in the Early Modern World. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. Courtly Encounters: Courtliness and Violence in Early Modern Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Subtelny, Maria Eva. “Centralizing Reform and Its Opponents in the Late Timurid Period.” Iranian Studies 21, 1–2 (1988): 123–51.Google Scholar
Subtelny, Maria Eva. “Socioeconomic Bases of Cultural Patronage under the Later Timurids.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 20, 4 (1988): 479505.Google Scholar
Subtelny, Maria Eva. “The Sunni Revival under Shāh-Rukh and Its Promoters: A Study of the Connection between Ideology and Higher Learning in Iran.” In Proceedings of the 27th Meeting of Haneda Memorial Hall Symposium on Central Asia and Iran, August 30, 1993, 1423. Kyoto: Institute of Inner Asian Studies, 1993.Google Scholar
Subtelny, Maria Eva. “The Cult of ‘Abdullah Anṣārī under the Timurids.” In Gott Ist Schön Und Er Liebt Die Schönheit – God Is Beautiful and He Loves Beauty, edited by Giese, Alma and Bürgel, J. Christoph, 377406. Bern: Peter Lang, 1994.Google Scholar
Subtelny, Maria Eva. Timurids in Transition Turko-Persian Politics and Acculturation in Medieval Iran. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Subtelny, Maria Eva, and Khalidov, Anas B.. “The Curriculum of Islamic Higher Learning in Timurid Iran in the Light of the Sunni Revival under Shāh-Rukh.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 115, 2 (April 1, 1995): 210–36.Google Scholar
Şükrü, Mehmed. “Das Hešt Behešt des Idrīs Bitlīsī.” Der Islam 19 (1931): 131–92.Google Scholar
Şulul, Kasım. İslâm Düşüncesinde Tarih Tasavvuru Usûlü. Istanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2008.Google Scholar
Tansel, Selâhattin. Yavuz Sultan Selim. Ankara: Millı Eğitim Basımevi, 1969.Google Scholar
Tauer, Felix. Histoire de la campagne du sultan Suleyman Ier contre Belgrade en 1521. Prague: F. Řivnáče, 1924.Google Scholar
Tauer, Felix. “Les Manuscrits persans historiques des bibliothèques de Stamboul, IV.” Archiv Orientální 4 (1932): 92107.Google Scholar
Tauer, Felix. “Hâfizi Abrû sur l’historiographie.” In Mélanges d’orientalisme offerts à Henri Massé à l’occasion de 75ème anniversaire, 10125. Tehran: Impermerie de l’Université de Téhéran, 1963.Google Scholar
Tavakkolî, Hasan. “İdrîs Bitlîsî’nin “Kanun-ı Şâhenşâhisi’nin tenkidli neşri ve Türkçeye tercümesi.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü, 1974.Google Scholar
Tekindağ, M. C. Şehabeddin. “Son Osmanlı – Karaman Münâsebetleri Hakkında Araştırmalar.” Tarih Dergisi 13, 17–18 (1963): 4376.Google Scholar
Tekindağ, M. C. Şehabeddin. “Fatih’in Ölümü Meselesi.” Tarih Dergisi 16 (1966): 95108.Google Scholar
Tekindağ, M. C. Şehabeddin. “Yeni Kaynak ve Vesikaların ışığı altında Yavuz Sultan Selim’in İran Seferi.” Tarih Dergisi 22 (1967): 4978.Google Scholar
Tekin, Şinasi. “Fatih Sultan Mehmed Devrine Âit Bir İnşâ Mecmuası.” Journal of Turkish Studies 20 (1996): 267311.Google Scholar
Terzioğlu, Derin. “How to Conceptualize Ottoman Sunnitization: A Historiographical Discussion.” Turcica 44 (2012): 301–38.Google Scholar
Tezcan, Baki. “The Politics of Early Modern Ottoman Historiography.” In The Early Modern Ottomans: Remapping the Empire, edited by Aksan, Virginia and Goffman, Daniel 167–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Thackston, W. M., trans. “Anonymous Synoptic Account of the Timurid House.” In Album Prefaces and Other Documents on the History of Calligraphers and Painters, 8898. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
al-Tikriti, Nabil. “The Ḥajj as Justifiable Self-Exile: Şehzade Korkud’s Wasīlat Al-Aḥbāb (915–916/1509–1510).” Al-Masāq 17, 1 (2005): 125–46.Google Scholar
Todd, Richard. The Sufi Doctrine of Man: Ṣadr Al-Dī̄n Al-Qūnawī’s Metaphysical Anthropology. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Togan, Zeki Velidi. Umumi Türk tarihine giriş: en eski devirlerden 16. asra kadar. Istanbul: İsmail Akgün Matbaası, 1946.Google Scholar
Togan, Zeki Velidi. “Ortaçağ İslâm Âleminde Tenkidî Tarih Telâkkîsi.” İslâm Tetkikleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 1 (1953): 4349.Google Scholar
Touati, Houari. Islam and Travel in the Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Turan, Osman. Türkiye Selçukluları Hakkında resmî vesikalar Metin, Tercüme ve Araştırmalar. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevı, 1958.Google Scholar
Uğur, Ahmet. Yavuz Sultan Selim. 2. baskı, vol. 2. Erciyes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü yayınları 2. Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 1992.Google Scholar
Uluçay, M. Çağatay. “Yavuz Sultan Selim nasıl padişah oldu?Tarih Dergisi 9 (1954): 390.Google Scholar
Uluçay, M. Çağatay. “Bayazid II. in Ailesi.” Tarih Dergisi 10, 14 (1959): 105–24.Google Scholar
Uluçay, M. Çağatay. Padişahların kadınları ve kızları. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1980.Google Scholar
Unat, Yavuz. “Mustafa İbn Ali el-Muvakkit ve İ‘lâm el-‘İbâd fî A‘lâm el-Bilâd (Şehirler Aleminde Mesafelerin Bildirimi) Adlı Risâlesi.” Electronic Journal of Oriental Studies 7, 10 (2004): 148.Google Scholar
Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı. “Karamanoğulları Devrî Vesikalarından İbrahim Beyin Karaman İmareti Vakfiyesi.” Belleten 1 (1937): 57143.Google Scholar
Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı. “II’inci Bayezid’in oğullarından Sultan Korkut.” Belleten 30, 120 (1966): 539–1.Google Scholar
Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı. “Fatih Sultan Mehmed’in Ölümü.” Belleten 39 (1975): 473–81.Google Scholar
Van Renterghem, Vanessa. “Controlling and Developing Baghdad: Caliphs, Sultans, and the Balance of Power in the Abbasid Capital.” In The Seljuqs: Politics, Society, and Culture, edited by Lange, Christian and Mecit, Songul, 117–38. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Van Steenbergen, Jo. Order Out of Chaos: Patronage, Conflict, and Mamluk Socio-Political Culture, 1341–1382. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Van Steenbergen, Jo. “Qalāwūnid Discourse, Elite Communication and the Mamluk Cultural Matrix: Interpreting a 14th-Century Panegyric.” Journal of Arabic Literature 43 (2012): 128.Google Scholar
Varlık, Nükhet. Plague and Empire in the Early Modern Mediterranean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Vatin, Nicolas. Sultan Djem: un prince ottoman dans l’Europe du XVe siècle d’après deux sources contemporaines: Vâḳiʻât-ı Sulṭân Cem, Œuvres de Guillaume Caoursin. Ankara: Imprimerie de la Société turque d’historire [sic], 1997.Google Scholar
Voll, John Obert. “Islam as a Community of Discourse and a World-System.” In The SAGE Handbook of Islamic Studies, edited by Ahmed, Akbar S. and Sonn, Tamara, 316. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Welsford, Thomas. Four Types of Loyalty in Early Modern Central Asia: The Tūqāy-Tīmūrid Takeover of Greater Mā Warā al-Nahr, 1598–1605. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Wick, Alexis. “Modern Historiography – Arab World.” In Companion to Global Historical Thought, edited by Duara, Prasenjit and Murthy, Viren, 308–20. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar
Wittek, Paul. The Rise of the Ottoman Empire. Royal Asiatic Society Monographs, vol. XXIII. London: The Royal Asiatic Society, 1938.Google Scholar
Wittek, Paul. The Rise of the Ottoman Empire: Studies in the History of Turkey, Thirteenth-Fifteenth Centuries. Edited by Heywood, Colin. Royal Asiatic Society Books. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Christine. Taʿlīkīzāde’s Şehnāme-i hümāyūn: A History of the Ottoman Campaign into Hungary, 1593–94. Berlin: K. Schwartz, 1982.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Christine. “An Experiment in Official Historiography: The Post of Şehnameci in the Ottoman Empire, ca. 1555–1605.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 75 (1983): 157–82.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Christine. “Murad III and the Historians: Representations of Ottoman Imperial Authority in Late 16th Century Historiography.” In Authority and Legitimacy in the Ottoman Empire, edited by Karateke, Hakan and Reinkowski, Maurus, 8598. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Christine. “Reading Ottoman şehnames: Official Historiography in the Late Sixteenth Century.” Studia Islamica 104–5 (2007): 6780.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Christine. Woods, John E. “The Rise of Tīmūrid Historiography.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 43 (1987): 81108.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Christine. Woods, John E. The Timurid Dynasty. Papers on Inner Asia; No. 14. Y. Bloomington: Indiana University, Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, 1990.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Christine. Woods, John E. “Timur’s Genealogy.” In Intellectual Studies on Islam: Essays Written in Honor of Martin B. Dickson, edited by Mazzaoui, Michel M. and Moreen, Vera B., 85125. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Christine. Woods, John E. The Aqquyunlu: Clan, Confederation, Empire. Revised and expanded edition. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Mehmet. The Dîvân of Qânsûh Al-Ghûrî. Studies in Turkish Culture = Türk Kültüru Incelemeleri. Istanbul: Bay, 2002.Google Scholar
Yıldırım, Muhammad İbrahim. “İdris-i Bitlisî, Heşt Behişt VII. Ketibe, Sultan Mehmed Devri, 1451–1481.” Ph.D., İstanbul Üniversitesi, 2010.Google Scholar
Yıldırım, Rıza. “Turkomans between Two Empires: Origins of the Qizilbash Identity in Anatolia (1447–1514).” Ph.D., Bilkent University, 2008.Google Scholar
Yıldız, Sara Nur. “Ottoman Historical Writing in Persian, 1400–1600.” In Persian Historiography, edited by Melville, C. P., 436502. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Hüseyin. The Caliphate Redefined: The Mystical Turn in Ottoman Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Christopher Markiewicz, University of Birmingham
  • Book: The Crisis of Kingship in Late Medieval Islam
  • Online publication: 03 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684842.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Christopher Markiewicz, University of Birmingham
  • Book: The Crisis of Kingship in Late Medieval Islam
  • Online publication: 03 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684842.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Christopher Markiewicz, University of Birmingham
  • Book: The Crisis of Kingship in Late Medieval Islam
  • Online publication: 03 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684842.012
Available formats
×