COVID and Climate Emergencies in the Majority World Confronting Cascading Crises in the Age of Consequences
Book contents
- COVID and Climate Emergencies in the Majority World
- Reviews
- COVID and Climate Emergencies in the Majority World
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Portrait of a Grief
- 2 Collapsing Dominoes
- 3 Vulnerabilities Amplified
- 4 Walled World
- 5 Obscene Opulence
- 6 Climate Nationalism
- 7 Toggling the System
- 8 Decluttering Consumption
- 9 Confronting Neo-Liberalism
- 10 Ceasing Arrogance
- 11 Making Amends
- 12 Collective Solidarities
- 13 Decolonising from Within
- 14 Indigenous Epistemology
- 15 Communicating Risks
- 16 The Hubris of Control
- 17 Mobilising the 3.5 Per Cent
- Index
- References
8 - Decluttering Consumption
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2023
Book contents
- COVID and Climate Emergencies in the Majority World
- Reviews
- COVID and Climate Emergencies in the Majority World
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Portrait of a Grief
- 2 Collapsing Dominoes
- 3 Vulnerabilities Amplified
- 4 Walled World
- 5 Obscene Opulence
- 6 Climate Nationalism
- 7 Toggling the System
- 8 Decluttering Consumption
- 9 Confronting Neo-Liberalism
- 10 Ceasing Arrogance
- 11 Making Amends
- 12 Collective Solidarities
- 13 Decolonising from Within
- 14 Indigenous Epistemology
- 15 Communicating Risks
- 16 The Hubris of Control
- 17 Mobilising the 3.5 Per Cent
- Index
- References
Summary
We need better economic ideas that encourage moderation in our consumption while tackling the underlying constraints of neo-liberal economics in sustaining life on Earth and solving the global inequality crisis. Minimalism and self-sufficiency declutter consumption practices and respect the limits of the living planet.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- COVID and Climate Emergencies in the Majority WorldConfronting Cascading Crises in the Age of Consequences, pp. 73 - 83Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Bishwajit, G., Sarker, S., Kpoghomou, M. A., Gao, H., Jun, L., Yin, D., & Ghosh, S. (2013). Self-sufficiency in rice and food security: A South Asian perspective. Agriculture & Food Security, 2(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, N. K. (2021). The theory and practice of sarvodaya. In Power, P. (Ed.), The Meanings of Gandhi (pp. 79–90). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Bottan, N., Hoffmann, B., & Vera-Cossio, D. (2020). The unequal impact of the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from seventeen developing countries. PLoS One, 15(10), e0239797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buerkle, C. W. (2019). Kitchen porn: Of consumerist fantasies and desires. In Meyers, M. (Ed.), Neoliberalism and the Media (pp. 147–162). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calzadilla, P. V. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals, climate crisis and sustained injustices. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 11(1), 285–314.Google Scholar
Cassinat, J. R., Whiteman, S. D., Serang, S., Dotterer, A. M., Mustillo, S. A., Maggs, J. L., & Kelly, B. C. (2021). Changes in family chaos and family relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 57(10), 1597–1610.Google Scholar
Corlett, R. T., Primack, R. B., Devictor, V., Maas, B., Goswami, V. R., Bates, A. E., … & Roth, R. (2020). Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 246, 108571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deaton, A. (2021). COVID-19 and Global Income Inequality (No. w28392). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Delina, L. L. (2020). A rural energy collaboratory: Co-production in Thailand’s community energy experiments. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 10(1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delina, L. L. (2022). Co-producing just energy transition in everyday practices: Sociotechnical innovation and sustainable development in the Thailand–Myanmar border. Local Environment, 27(1), 16–31.Google Scholar
Dobers, P., & Strannegård, L. (2005). Design, lifestyles and sustainability. Aesthetic consumption in a world of abundance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(5), 324–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, S. (2019). The Lie of Global Prosperity: How Neoliberals Distort Data to Mask Poverty and Exploitation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Eike, R. J., Burton, M., Hustvedt, G., & Cho, S. (2021). The ‘joy of letting go’: Decluttering and apparel. Fashion Practice, 14(2), 225–241.Google Scholar
Eisenmenger, N., Pichler, M., Krenmayr, N., Noll, D., Plank, B., Schalmann, E., … & Gingrich, S. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: A critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1101–1110.Google Scholar
Erickson, P., Down, A., Lazarus, M., & Koplow, D. (2017). Effect of subsidies to fossil fuel companies on United States crude oil production. Nature Energy, 2(11), 891–898.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., & Büscher, B. (2015). NatureTM Inc.: Nature as neoliberal capitalist imaginary. In Bryant, R. (Ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gaddi, M., Garbellini, N., & Garibaldo, F. (2021). The growing inequalities in Italy –North/South – and the increasing dependency of the successful North upon German and French industries. European Planning Studies, 29(9), 1637–1655.Google Scholar
González Hernando, M. (2019). British Think Tanks After the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hing, L. S. S., Wilson, A. E., Gourevitch, P., English, J., & Sin, P. (2019). Failure to respond to rising income inequality: Processes that legitimize growing disparities. Daedalus, 148(3), 105–135.Google Scholar
Hope, D., & Limberg, J. (2022). The economic consequences of major tax cuts for the rich. Socio-Economic Review, 20, 539–559.Google Scholar
Iceland, J. (2019). Racial and ethnic inequality in poverty and affluence, 1959–2015. Population Research and Policy Review, 38(5), 615–654.Google Scholar
Iran, S., Joyner Martinez, C. M., Vladimirova, K., Wallaschkowski, S., Diddi, S., Henninger, C. E., … & Tiedke, L. (2022). When mortality knocks: Pandemic-inspired attitude shifts towards sustainable clothing consumption in six countries. International Journal of Sustainable Fashion & Textiles, 1(1), 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, S. K. (2022). On the normative structure of Gandhian thought: With special reference to Hind Swaraj. In Bhargava, R. (Ed.), Politics, Ethics and the Self (pp. 110–118). New Delhi: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kakati, B. K. (2021). Gram swaraj: The sustainable model for rural industrialisation and employment. International Journal of Community and Social Development, 3(3), 274–289.Google Scholar
Kakoty, S. (2022). Time to globalize sarvodaya? In Mukherjee, S. & Zsolnai, L. (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Indian Spirituality and Management (pp. 123–131). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2018). Gandhian philosophy for living in the modern world: Lessons from the psychology of satyagraha. In Fernando, D. & Moodley, R. (Eds.), Global Psychologies (pp. 229–243). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ma, R. R., Xiong, T., & Bao, Y. (2021). The Russia–Saudi Arabia oil price war during the COVID-19 pandemic. Energy Economics, 102, 105517.Google Scholar
Mansfield, B. (Ed.). (2009). Privatization: Property and the Remaking of Nature–Society Relations. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Merkel, W. (2018). Challenge or crisis of democracy. In Merkel, W. & Kneip, S. (Eds.), Democracy and Crisis (pp. 1–28). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Mishra, C., & Rath, N. (2020). Social solidarity during a pandemic: Through and beyond Durkheimian lens. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100079.Google Scholar
Morgan, L., Protopopova, A., Birkler, R. I. D., Itin-Shwartz, B., Sutton, G. A., Gamliel, A., … & Raz, T. (2020). Human–dog relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: Booming dog adoption during social isolation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, P. (2021). Towards a fossil fuel treaty. In Bohm, S. & Sullivan, S. (Eds.), Negotiating Climate Change in Crisis (pp. 209–216). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Pawar, S. S. (2021). Mahatma Gandhi’s economic thoughts on agriculture. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 2144–2148.Google Scholar
Pereira Heath, M. T., & Chatzidakis, A. (2012). ‘Blame it on marketing’: Consumers’ views on unsustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(6), 656–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, G. P., Marland, G., Le Quéré, C., Boden, T., Canadell, J. G., & Raupach, M. R. (2012). Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008–2009 global financial crisis. Nature Climate Change, 2(1), 2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirani, S. (2018). Burning Up: A Global History of Fossil Fuel Consumption. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Prime, H., Wade, M., & Browne, D. T. (2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 75(5), 631–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rai, D., & Tiwary, R. M. (2021). Gandhi and satyagraha: A quest for global transformation. Social Change, 51(1), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapeli, L., & Saikkonen, I. (2020). How will the COVID-19 pandemic affect democracy? Democratic Theory, 7(2), 25–32.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. I. (2020). Global capitalism post-pandemic. Race & Class, 62(2), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, J. (2018). The US minimalist movement: Radical political practice? Review of Radical Political Economics, 50(2), 286–296.Google Scholar
Sandlin, J. A., & Wallin, J. J. (2022). Decluttering the pandemic: Marie Kondo, minimalism, and the ‘joy’ of waste. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 22(1), 96–102.Google Scholar
Schmid, L. (2021). Deportation, harms, and human rights. Ethics & Global Politics, 14(2), 98–109.Google Scholar
Singh, P. (2016). Significance of Gandhian contemplation about self-sufficient village economy of India after economic reform. Quest – The Journal of UGC-HRDC Nainital, 10(2), 151–156.Google Scholar
Singh, V. (2018). Myths of meritocracy: Caste, karma and the new racism, a comparative study. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(15), 2693–2710.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J., & van Asselt, H. (2019). The politics of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform: Implications for climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(4), e581.Google Scholar
Stanton, T., Kay, P., Johnson, M., Chan, F. K. S., Gomes, R. L., Hughes, J., … & Xu, Y. (2021). It’s the product not the polymer: Rethinking plastic pollution. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 8(1), e1490.Google Scholar
Suppa, A., & Bureš, P. (2020). Can multinational corporations be responsible for human rights violation of its outsourcee company? Response of national or international law? International & Comparative Law Review, 20(1), 153–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thøgersen, J. (2014). Unsustainable consumption: Basic causes and implications for policy. European Psychologist, 19(2), 84–95.Google Scholar
Timmons Roberts, J., & Parks, B. C. (2007). Fueling injustice: Globalization, ecologically unequal exchange and climate change. Globalizations, 4(2), 193–210.Google Scholar
Touchette, Y. (2015). G20 Subsidies to Oil, Gas and Coal Production. International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Urban, M. C. (2015). Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science, 348(6234), 571–573.Google Scholar
Zhang, A., & Huang, G. Q. (2012). Impacts of business environment changes on global manufacturing outsourcing in China. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 138–51.Google Scholar