Litigating for Social Justice in Post-Apartheid South Africa: A Focus on Health and Education

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511511240.004

2 - Litigating for Social Justice in Post-Apartheid South Africa: A Focus on Health and Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2009

Berger Jonathan

Edited by

Varun Gauri and

Daniel M. Brinks

Show author details

Varun Gauri: Affiliation:
The World Bank

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The socioeconomic (SE) rights protections in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the Constitution) have been used with varying degrees of success to improve the lives of poor people. Whether enforced directly to advance rights claims or to challenge unjustifiable legislation, or indirectly as part of statutory interpretation, these rights have shown significant potential as tools for the advancement of a pro-poor social justice agenda. But their limits have also been exposed as some judicial officers have struggled to give meaning to competing claims for limited state resources and others have seemingly succumbed – whether consciously or otherwise – to indirect political pressure and problematic arguments regarding the appropriate role for an unelected judiciary.

This chapter begins with an introduction to South Africa's legal system, focusing on the supremacy of the Constitution and the manner in and the extent to which it addresses SE rights. In so doing, it starts by briefly tracking the legal and political developments that resulted in a transition from white minority rule to a democratic post-apartheid constitutional state. Thereafter, it contextualizes the SE rights protections in the Constitution, detailing how they relate to each other as well as other key provisions in the Bill of Rights. In particular, the chapter explains that the Constitution's approach to SE rights is – in conceptual terms – largely indistinguishable from the manner in which it addresses civil and political rights.

Type: Chapter
Information: Courting Social Justice
Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World
, pp. 38 - 99

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511240.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, R. 1995. Politics by other means: Law in the struggle against apartheid. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar

,AIDS Law Project. n.d. Consensus statement on improving access to legal services for people living with HIV/AIDS. Available at http://www.alp.org.za/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=280.

,AIDS Law Project. n.d. Submission to the Ad Hoc committee on the review of state institutions supporting constitutional democracy (in particular Annexure 1). Available at http://www.alp.org.za/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=340&DC100SID=fa0b1f56a4e20c2c2a14132e1d5440d4.

,AIDS Law Project. 2006, December 8. “TAC agreements with GlaxoSmithKline and Boehringer Ingelheim remain in force,” press release. Available at http://www.alp.org.za/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=331

Avafia, T., Berger, J., and Hartzenberg, T.. 2006. The ability of select sub-Saharan African countries to utilise TRIPs flexibilities and competition law to ensure a sustainable supply of essential medicines: A study of producing and importing countries. Tralac Working Paper No. 12, University of Stellenbosch Printers, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Available at http://www.tralac.org/pdf/20061002_Avafia_TRIPsandCompetitionLaw.pdf.

Beresford, B. 2003. The price of life – Hazel Tau and Others v. GlaxoSmithKline and Boehringer Ingelheim: A report on the excessive pricing complaint to South Africa's Competition Commission. Available at http://www.alp.org.za/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=222.

Berger, J. 2005. Advancing public health by other means: Using competition policy. In Roffe, P., Tansey, G., Eugui, D. Vivas- et al (eds.), Negotiating health: Intellectual property and access to medicines.London: Earthscan: 181–204.Google Scholar

Bhorat, H. 2004. The development challenge in post-apartheid South African education. In Chisholm, L. (ed.), Changing class: Education and social change in post-apartheid South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council Press: 31–55.Google Scholar

Bilchitz, D. 2002. Giving socio-economic rights teeth: The minimum core and its importance. South African Law Journal 119: 484–501.Google Scholar

Bilchitz, D. 2003. Towards a reasonable approach to the minimum core: Laying the foundations for future socio-economic rights jurisprudence. South African Journal on Human Rights, 19: 1–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bilchitz, D. 2006. The right to health care services and the minimum core: Disentangling the principled and pragmatic strands. ESR Review 7(2): 2–6.Google Scholar

Brand, D. 2002. Afrox Healthcare v. Strydom: Supreme Court of Appeals, Case No. 172/2001, 31 May 2002(unreported at date of writing). ESR Review 3(2): 17–18.Google Scholar

Brand, D. 2005. Introduction to socio-economic rights in the South African Constitution. In Brand, D. and Heyns, C. (eds.), Socio-economic rights in South Africa. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press: 1–56.Google Scholar

Cameron, E., and Berger, J.. 2005. Patents and public health: Principle, politics and paradox. Proceedings of the British Academy 131: 331–369. Also published in D. Vaver (ed.). 2005. Intellectual property rights. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

,Competition Commission. 2003. October. Media Release No. 29 of 2003: Competition Commission finds pharmaceutical firms in contravention of the Competition Act. Available at http://www.compcom.co.za/resources/Media%20Releases/MediaReleases%202003/Jul/Med%20Rel%2030%200f%2016%20Oct%202003.asp.

Davis, D. M. 2006. Adjudicating the socio-economic rights in the South African constitution: Towards “deference lite”?South African Journal on Human Rights 22: 301–327.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davis, D. M. 1992. The case against the inclusion of socio-economic rights demands in a bill of rights except as directive principles. South African Journal on Human Rights 8: 475–490.CrossRef Google Scholar

,Department of Health. 2003, November 19. Operational plan on comprehensive care and treatment for HIV and AIDS. Available at: http://www.info.gov.za/issues/hiv/careplan.htm.

,Department of Health. 2006, March 9. Announcement of a draft dispensing fee and release of a revised HR plan. Available at http://www.doh.gov.za/docs/pr/2006/pr0309.html.

Villiers, N. 2002. Social grants and the promotion of administrative justice act. South African Journal on Human Right, 18: 320–349.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. 1995. Judging the judges, judging ourselves: Truth, reconciliation and the apartheid legal order. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Fredman, S. 2005. Providing equality: Substantive equality and the positive duty to provide. South African Journal on Human Rights, 21: 163–190.CrossRef Google Scholar

Geffen, N., Berger, J., and Golembeski, C.. 2006. ARV ruling for prison spotlights access to health for all. Cape Argus, June 29. Available at http://www.capeargus.co.za/index.php?fSectionid=498&fArticleId=3316390.

,Government of the Republic of South Africa. 2003, August 8. Statement on special cabinet meeting: Enhanced programme against HIV and AIDS. Available at http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2003/03081109461001.htm

Groenewald, Y., and Bangerezako, H.. 2006. A fresh look at our watchdogs. Mail & Guardian, November 21. Available at http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=290663&area=/insight/insight_national.

Gumede, W. M. 2005. Thabo Mbeki and the battle for the soul of the ANC. Cape Town, South Africa: Zebra Press.Google Scholar

Hassim, A. 2006. The “5 star” prison hotel? The right of access to ARV treatment for HIV positive prisoners in South Africa. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 2: 157–171.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hassim, A., and Berger, J.. 2006. Case review: Prisoners' right of access to anti-retroviral treatment. ESR Review, 7(4): 18–21.Google Scholar

Hassim, A., Heywood, M., and Berger, J. (eds.). 2007. Health & democracy: A guide to human rights, health law and policy in post-apartheid South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: SiberInk.

Haysom, N. 1992. Constitutionalism, majoritarian democracy and socio-economic rights. South African Journal on Human Rights, 8: 451–463.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heywood, M. 2001. Debunking conglomo-talk: A case study of the amicus curiae as an instrument for advocacy, investigation and mobilisation. Law, Democracy and Development, 5: 133–162.Google Scholar

Heywood, M. 2003a. Contempt or compliance? The TAC case after the Constitutional Court judgment. ESR Review, 4(1): 7–10.Google Scholar

Heywood, M. 2003b. Preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission in South Africa: Background, strategies and outcomes of the Treatment Action Campaign case against the Minister of Health. South African Journal on Human Rights, 19: 278–315.Google Scholar

James, D. 2002. Tenure reformed: Policy and practice in the case of South Africa's landless people (seminar, Wits Interdisciplinary Research Seminar, October 28). Available at http://wiserweb.wits.ac.za/events%20-%20wirs.htm.

Jones, P., and Stokke, K. (eds.). 2005. Democratising development: The politics of socio-economic rights in South Africa. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

Langa, P. 2006. Keynote Address. Presented at the HIV and Access to Legal Services Conference, February 17–18. Available at http://www.alp.org.za/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=280.

Liebenberg, S. 1995. The international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights and its implications for South Africa. South African Journal on Human Rights, 11: 359–378.CrossRef Google Scholar

Liebenberg, S. 2004. Basic rights claims: How responsive is “reasonableness review”? ESR Review 5(5): 7–11.Google Scholar

Mahomed, A. 2003. Grootboom and its impact on evictions: Neville Rudolph and Others v. City of Cape Town. ESR Review 4(3): 2–4.

McClain, C. 2002. The SA Human Rights Commission and socio-economic rights. ESR Review 3(1): 8–9.Google Scholar

Mlambo-Ngcuka, P. 2006. Stop HIV and AIDS – Keep the promise. Address delivered by the Deputy President at the World AIDS Day event, KaNyamazane, Nelspruit, Mpumalanga, December 1, 2006. Available at http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2006/06120112451001.htm

Motala, Z. 1995. Socio-economic rights, federalism and the courts: Comparative lessons for South Africa. South African Law Journal 112: 61–87.Google Scholar

Muntingh, L., and Mbazira, C.. 2006. Prisoners' right of access to anti-retroviral treatment. ESR Review 7(2): 14–16.Google Scholar

Mureinik, E. 1992. Beyond a charter of luxuries: Economic rights in the constitution. South African Journal on Human Rights 8: 464–474.CrossRef Google Scholar

Newman, D. G., 2003. Institutional monitoring of social and economic rights: A South African case study and a new research agenda. South African Journal on Human Rights, 19: 189–216.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ngwena, C., and Cook, R.. 2005. Rights concerning health. In Brand, D. and Heyns, C. (eds.), Socio-economic rights in South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Pretoria University Law Press: 107–152.Google Scholar

Pieterse, M. 2006. Resuscitating socio-economic rights: Constitutional entitlements to health care services. South African Journal on Human Rights, 22: 473–502.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pillay, K. 2002. “Implementing Grootboom: Supervision Needed” ESR Review, 3(1): 13–14.Google Scholar

Plasket, C. 2003. Administrative justice and social assistance. South African Law Journal, 120: 494–524.Google Scholar

Roach, K., and Budlender, G.. 2005. Mandatory relief and supervisory jurisdiction: When is it appropriate, just and equitable?South African Law Journal 122: 325–351.Google Scholar

Scott, C., and Macklem, P.. 1992. Constitutional ropes of sand or justiciable guarantees: Social rights in a new South African constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141: 1–148.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sloth-Nielsen, J. 2004. Case review 1: Extending access to social assistance to permanent residents. ESR Review 5(3): 9–11.Google Scholar

Swart, M. 2005. Left out in the cold? Crafting constitutional remedies for the poorest of the poor. South African Journal on Human Rights 21: 215–240.CrossRef Google Scholar

,Treatment Action Campaign. 2004. MinMEC agrees to interim procurement of antiretroviral medicines: Court action averted at last moment. Available at http://www.tac.org.za/newsletter/2004/ns25_03_2004.htm.

Veriava, F., and Coomans, F.. 2005. The right to education. In Brand, D. and Heyns, C. (eds.), Socio-economic rights in South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Pretoria University Law Press: 57–84.Google Scholar

Wildeman, R. A. 2006, June 28. A review of national and provincial education budgets 2006, IDASA Occasional Paper. Available at http://www.idasa.org.za/index.asp?page=output_details.asp%3FRID%3D997%26OTID%3D16%26PID%3D40.