Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Reviews
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, December 1966
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, October 1967
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, January 1968
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, July 1968
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, December 1968
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, April 1969
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, August 1969
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, September 1969
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, January 1970
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, July 1970
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1971
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, April 1971
- The Village Voice, September 9, 1971
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, November 1971
- College English, 33:3, December 1971
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, December 1972
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1973
- Village Voice, June 16, 1973
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, July 1973
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1974
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, January 1975
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, March 1975
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, April 1975
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, November 1976
- Frontiers, III:3, fall, 1978
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1979
- “Book World,” The Washington Post, April 1, 1979
- “Book World,” The Washington Post, May 9, 1979
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, June 1979
- The Feminist Review, #5 [in The New Women's Times, 5:14, July 16–19, 1979]
- Frontiers, IV:1, 1979
- Frontiers, IV: 2, 1979
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, November 1979
- “Book World,” The Washington Post, January 24, 1980
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1980
- Sinister Wisdom, 12, winter 1980
- Frontiers, V:3, 1981
- “Book World,” The Washington Post, May 10, 1981
- Essays
- Letters
- Index of Books and Authors Reviewed
The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, July 1968
from Reviews
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Reviews
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, December 1966
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, October 1967
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, January 1968
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, July 1968
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, December 1968
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, April 1969
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, August 1969
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, September 1969
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, January 1970
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, July 1970
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1971
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, April 1971
- The Village Voice, September 9, 1971
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, November 1971
- College English, 33:3, December 1971
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, December 1972
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1973
- Village Voice, June 16, 1973
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, July 1973
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1974
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, January 1975
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, March 1975
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, April 1975
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, November 1976
- Frontiers, III:3, fall, 1978
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1979
- “Book World,” The Washington Post, April 1, 1979
- “Book World,” The Washington Post, May 9, 1979
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, June 1979
- The Feminist Review, #5 [in The New Women's Times, 5:14, July 16–19, 1979]
- Frontiers, IV:1, 1979
- Frontiers, IV: 2, 1979
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, November 1979
- “Book World,” The Washington Post, January 24, 1980
- The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, February 1980
- Sinister Wisdom, 12, winter 1980
- Frontiers, V:3, 1981
- “Book World,” The Washington Post, May 10, 1981
- Essays
- Letters
- Index of Books and Authors Reviewed
Summary
The Best of the Best. Ed. Judith Merril (Delacorte, $6.50). Ashes, Ashes. René Barjavel, trans. Damon Knight (Doubleday, $3.95). A Torrent of Faces. James Blish and Norman L. Knight (Doubleday, $4.95)
The Best of the Best is a collection of stories chosen by the editor from her previous anthologies, The Year's Best S-F, from 1955 to 1960. At about the fifth story, the Merrilian bent of these twenty-nine tales becomes clear – they are human, “poignant,” chosen for feeling and not for gimmickry or detachable ideas. The hard sciences are conspicuously absent. So is philosophy, despite the editor's introduction. At best this leads to stories like J. G. Ballard's “Prima Belladonna,” the first of his Vermilion Sands stories I ever read. Is it the first ever published? When it appeared in the second annual Best anthology this story seemed cryptic, but it vindicates Miss Merril's judgment retrospectively. It's not only full-bodied and perfectly clear; it's probably one of the earliest future-society-taken-forgranted- instead-of-explained stories and it still manages to look futuristic and fresh. Human feeling and literary finish were also good guides in selecting the star of the collection, Gummitch the superkitten (!), who returns in “Space-Time for Springers” by Fritz Leiber. The less I say about this story the less I will slobber over the page and make a nut of myself. There are also two by Carol Emshwiller, Avram Davidson's “Golem,” and an early (?) Cordwainer Smith (“No, No. Not Rogov!”) which is only half mad, and Damon Knight's “Stranger Station.” These are all first-rate stories and so are many of the others. But.
The editor's taste for “the human factor” – or a retrospective interest in New Thing writers like Ballard and Emshwiller – or perhaps a reaction against too much hardware in the field (both now and back then) – has made The Best of the Best a surprisingly monotonous book. The stories are good, but the tone is somehow the same all through. In her introduction the editor notes that science fiction is “a field which degenerates … readily into mere adventure story.” In avoiding “mere adventure story,” Miss Merril sometimes chooses stories that degenerate into mere somethingelse. Walter Miller's “Hoofer,” for example, need not have been done as s-f at all.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Country You Have Never SeenEssays and Reviews, pp. 8 - 11Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2007