The WTO/GATS Mode 4, international labor migration regimes and global justice

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511761263.004

4 - The WTO/GATS Mode 4, international labor migration regimes and global justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2010

Tomer Broude

Edited by

Roland Pierik and

Wouter Werner

Show author details

Tomer Broude: Affiliation:
Law, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Roland Pierik: Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Wouter Werner: Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction: labour migration and global justice

The WTO's General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) “Mode 4” is currently the only internationally-agreed legal instrument with the potential to become a functioning multilateral regime regulating temporary labor migration. It is an international mechanism aimed at liberalizing service-related labor mobility on the basis of qualified negotiated commitments by states to accept non-permanent foreign labor migrants, subject to substantive rules that regulate and constrain states' unilateral temporary labor migration policies.

International trade and migration specialists query whether Mode 4 is effective as a global economic regime, and what may be done to make it work better. In this chapter I ask, rather, if GATS Mode 4 is just: does the model of international labor migration regulation that it represents conform to principles of global justice? This question is closely related to evaluations of the morality of autonomous national migration policies, but is independent of them, going one step beyond and considering an international legal and institutional migration arrangement from a global justice perspective. The exercise clearly holds lessons for the design of any future labor migration regime, but it is also important in the more general WTO context. To the extent that the WTO purportedly represents a global economic “constitution” for globalization, as is sometimes suggested, it must be sensitive to conflicting political and philosophical visions of global justice and the way that they relate to international economic disparity.

Type: Chapter
Information: Cosmopolitanism in Context
Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory
, pp. 75 - 105

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761263.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Nielson, Julia, “Labour Mobility in Regional Trade Agreements,” in Moving People to Deliver Services, ed. Mattoo, Aaditya and Antonia Carzaniga (Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Weiss, Friedl and Woolridge, Frank, Free Movement of Persons within the European Community (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002)Google Scholar

Barry, Christian and Thomas Pogge, Global Institutions and Responsibilities: Achieving Global Justice, (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005)Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., “Constitutional Conceits: The WTO's ‘Constitution’ and the Discipline of International Law,” European Journal of International Law 17, no. 3 (2006), pp. 647–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Boswell, Christina, “The Liberal Dilemma in the Ethics of Refugee Policy,” in The Migration Reader: Exploring Polities and Policies ed. Messina, Anthony M. and Lahav, Gallya (London: Lynne Reiner, 2006)Google Scholar

Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples with “the Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Phillips, Michael, “Reflections on the Transition from Ideal to non-Ideal Theory,” Noûs 19, no, 4 (1985), pp. 551–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph H., “Realistic and Idealistic Approaches to the Ethics of Migration,” International Migration Review 30, no. 1 (1996), pp. 156–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Caney, Simon, Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 2CrossRef Google Scholar

Lollock, Lisa, “The Foreign-Born Population in the United States: Population Characteristics,” (US Census Bureau, 2001), p. 1Google Scholar

Kapur, Devesh and McHale, John, Give Us Your Best and Brightest: The Global Hunt for Talent and its Impact on the Developing World, (Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2005)Google Scholar

Lucas, Robert E.B., International Migration and Economic Development: Lessons from Low-Income Countries, (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005)Google Scholar

Pritchett, Lant, Let Their People Come: Breaking the Gridlock on Global Labor Mobility, (Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2006)Google Scholar

Easterly, William, The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good, (New York: Penguin Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Broude, Tomer, “The Rule(s) of Trade and the Rhetos of Development: Reflections on the Functional and Aspirational Legitimacy of the World Trade Organization,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 27, no. 4 (2006), pp. 221–61Google Scholar

Hamilton, Bob and Whalley, John, “Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Global Restrictions on Labour Mobility: Calculations and Policy Implications,” Journal of Development Economics 14 (1984), pp. 61–75CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Martin, Philip, “Migration,” in Global Crises, Global Solutions ed. Lomborg, Bjorn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 443Google Scholar

Tanner, Arno, Emigration, Brain Drain and Development, (Helsinki: East–West Books, 2005), pp. 23–24Google Scholar

Charlton, Andrew and Stiglitz, Joseph, The Development Round of Trade Negotiations in the Aftermath of Cancun, (London: Commonwealth Secretariat/Initiative for Policy Dialogue, 2004)Google Scholar

Cox, Adam B. and Posner, Eric A., “The Second Order Structure of Immigration Law,” Stanford Law Review 59, no. 4 (2006), p. 809Google Scholar

Stoffman, Daniel, Who Gets In: What's Wrong with Canada's Immigration Program – and How to Fix It (Toronto: Macfarlane, Walter and Ross, 2002)Google Scholar

Borjas, George J., Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Rosenhek, Zeev, “Migration Regimes, Intra-State Conflicts and the Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion: Migrant Workers in the Israeli Welfare State,” Social Problems 47, no. 1 (2000), p. 49CrossRef Google Scholar

Chang, Howard F., “The Economic Impact of International Labor Migration: Recent Estimates and Policy Implications,” Temple Political & Civil Rights Review 16, no. 2 (2007)Google Scholar

Cornelius, Wayne A., “Death at the Border: Efficacy and Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Control Policy,” Population and Development Review 27, no. 4 (2001), pp. 661–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Chang, Howard F., “The Immigration Paradox: Poverty, Distributive Justice, and Liberal Egalitarianism,” DePaul Law Review 52 (2003), p. 759Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph H., “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,” Review of Politics 49, no. 2 (1987), p. 251CrossRef Google Scholar

Kordvani, Amir, “Hospitality, Politics of Mobility, and the Movement of Service Suppliers under the GATS,” Melbourne Journal of International Law 7 (2006), pp. 74–103Google Scholar

Moellendorf, Darrel, Cosmopolitan Justice, (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2002)Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E., “If People Were Money …,” in Barry, Brian and Goodin, Robert E., Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money, (Pennsylvania, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992), pp. 6–11Google Scholar

Dornbusch, Rudiger, Economics, 3rd edn. (London: McGraw-Hill, 1991)Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty,” in Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives, ed. Brown, Chris (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 89–122Google Scholar

Kok-Chor, Tan, Justice Without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p.2Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles R., Political Theory and International Relations, with a new afterword by the author, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999 [1979])Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, Realizing Rawls, (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P., “Welcome to Cosmopolis, World of Boundless Opportunity,” Cornell International Law Journal 39 (2006), pp. 477–501Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J., In Defense of National Interest: A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy, (New York, NY: Alfred Knopf, 1951)Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth, Theory of International Politics, (Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1979)Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, (London: Macmillan, 1977)CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, David, “Immigration: The Case for Limits,” in Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethic, ed. Cohen, Andrew L. and Wellman, Christopher Heath (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004)Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, “The WTO Constitution and Human Rights,” Journal of International Economic Law 3, no. 1 (2000), pp. 19–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, “Human Rights in the WTO: Whose Rights, What Humanity? Comment on Petersmann,” European Journal of International Law 13, no. 3 (2002), pp. 651–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, Pauwelyn, Joost, and Burgi, ElisabethHuman Rights and International Trade (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRef

Broude, Tomer, “Taking Trade and Culture Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 26, no. 4 (2005), pp. 623–92Google Scholar