Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2009
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Convergence in Shareholder Law , pp. 401 - 450Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
Ackermann, Rolf (1999), Pfadabhängigkeit, Institutionen und Regelreform, PhD Thesis, Freiburg.
(1994), Die Usurpation von Aktionärsbefugnissen mittels Ringverflechtung in der ‘Deutschland Aktiengesellschaft’, Aktiengesellschaft148.Google Scholar
Ahlering, Beth, and Deakin, Simon (2006), Labour Regulation, Corporate Governance and Legal Origin: A Case of Institutional Complementarity?, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=898184/ (and forthcoming in Law and Society Review).
(2000), Lobbyismus heute – Neue Herausforderungen durch Globalisierung, Europäisierung und Berlinisierung, Wirtschaftsdienst139.Google Scholar
Allen, William (1998), The Corporate Director's Fiduciary Duty of Care and the Business Judgment Rule Under US Corporate Law, in: , , , , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of Art and Emerging Research, Oxford: Clarendon, p. 307.Google Scholar
, and (1999), Free Movement of Companies from a Nordic Perspective, 6 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Kent's World: A Personal Approach to the Various Worlds of Japanese Law, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht36.Google Scholar
(1998), Cultural Hegemony: The Exportation of Anglo-Saxon Corporate Governance Ideologies to Germany, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 69.Google Scholar
ANSA (Association National de Sociétés par Actions) (2003), Proxy Voting Reform in France: A Guide to Non-Resident Shareholders, 2nd edition, available at www.ansa.asso.fr/site/acv_index_uk.asp.
(2001b), The New Regulatory and Supervisory Architecture of Japan's Financial Market, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht101.Google Scholar
(2003), Neuregelungen von Aufsicht, Rechtsdurchsetzung und Finanzdienstleistungen in Japan, 16 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht13.Google Scholar
Arlt, Marie-Agnes (2005), Frankreich, in: (ed.), Vorstandshaftung in 15 europäischen Ländern, Vienna: Linde, p. 467.Google Scholar
(2005), Who Should Make Corporate Law? European Community; Treaty establishing the European Community Legislation versus Regulatory Competition, 58 Current Legal Problems369.Google Scholar
, , and (2003), Shareholder Primacy and the Trajectory of UK Corporate Governance, 41 British Journal of Industrial Relations531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007), Who Writes the Rules for Hostile Takeovers, and Why? The Peculiar Divergences of US and UK Takeover Regulation, 95 Geo. L.J. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
(2003a), Reconsidering the Importance of Law in Japanese Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Daiwa Bank Shareholder Derivative Case, 36 Cornell Int'l L.J.11.Google Scholar
(2003b), Learning from Comparative Law in Teaching US Corporate Law: Director's Liability in Japan and the US, 22 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 213.Google Scholar
Assmann, Heinz-Dieter (1990), Einführung und Verformung westlichen Rechts im Finanz- und Kapitalmarktrecht Japans, in: , , , , , , and (eds.), Die Japanisierung des westlichen Rechts, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 275.Google Scholar
(2003), Corporate Governance im Schnittfeld von Gesellschaftsrecht und Kapitalmarktrecht, Festschrift Kümpel1.Google Scholar
(2001), Verwaltungsvollmacht und ‘Aktionärsdemokratie’: Selbstregulative Ansätze für die Hauptversammlung, Aktiengesellschaft635.Google Scholar
, and (1999), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002), Appraisal Rights in Japanese Corporate Law, 13 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht129.Google Scholar
(2006), Liberalized Rules for the Restructuring of Japanese Companies: Mergers, Demergers, and Share Exchanges under the New Company Law, 21 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht19.Google Scholar
(1997), What Causes New Securities Regulation?: 300 Years of Evidence, 75 Wash. U.L.Q. 849.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (2001), The Control of Corporate Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000), Social Dumping and the Race to the Bottom: Some Lessons for the European Union from Delaware, 25 E.L. Rev. 57.Google Scholar
, and (1972), Frankreich, Jura Europae, Droit des societés, Gesellschaftsrecht, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(1996), Der Markt für Unternehmen und die Regelung von öffenltichen Übernahmenangeboten in Japan, Aktiengesellschaft399.Google Scholar
Baum, Harald (1997), Börsen- und Kapitalmarktrecht in Japan, in: , , and (eds.), Börsenreform – Eine ökonomische, rechtsvergleichende und rechtspolitische Untersuchung, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, p. 1265.Google Scholar
(1998), Zur Diskussion über vergleichende Corporate Governance mit Japan, 62 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht739.Google Scholar
Baum, Harald (2000), Globalization, Capital Markets and Possible Regulatory Responses, in: , and (eds.), Legal Aspects of Globalization, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 77.Google Scholar
Baum, Harald and Hayakawa, Masaru (1994), Die rechtliche Gestaltung des japanischen Finanzmarktes, in: , and , Japanisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, New York: de Gruyter, p. 495.Google Scholar
Baums, Theodor (1998), Shareholder Representation and Proxy Voting in the European Union: A Comparative Study, in: , , , , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of Art and Emerging Research, Oxford: Clarendon, p. 545.Google Scholar
Baums, Theodor (1999), Globalisierung und deutsches Gesellschaftsrecht: Der Fall Daimler-Chrysler, in: (ed.), Profile der Wissenschaft. 25 Jahre Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück: Rasch, p. 235.Google Scholar
(2000), Empfiehlt sich eine Neuregelung des aktienrechtlichen Anfechtungs- und Organhaftungsrechts, insbesondere der Klagemöglichkeit von Aktionären?, Gutachten des 63. Deutschen Juristentages, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Baums, Theodor, and Möller, Matthias (2000), Venture Capital: US-amerikanisches Modell und deutsches Aktienrecht, in: ; , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 33.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (1999), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
(1994), Efficient and Inefficient Sales of Corporate Control, 109 Q.J. Econ. 957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), The Case Against Board Veto in Corporate Takeovers, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev. 973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye (2006), Letting Shareholders Set the Rules, 119 Harvard Law Review 1784.
, , and (2002), Does the Evidence Favor State Competition in Corporate Law?, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1775.Google Scholar
Bebchuk Lucian Arye, and Ferrell, Allen (2001), The Race to Protect Managers from Takeovers, in: , and (eds.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 68 (also published in: (1999) 99 Colum. L. Rev. 1168).Google Scholar
, and (2004), Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Vigorous Race or Leisurely Walk: Reconsidering the Competition over Corporate Charters, 112 Yale L.J.553.Google Scholar
Bebchuk Lucian Arye, and Roe, Mark J. (1999), A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance, 52 Stan. L. Rev. 127 (also published in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 69).Google Scholar
Becht Marco, Mayer, Colin, and Wagner, Hannes F. (2006), Where Do Firms Incorporate?, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=906066.
(2001), Die institutionelle Stimmrechtsvertretung der Aktionäre in Europa, Frankfurt (Main): Lang.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael (1997b), Börsen- und Kapitalmarktrecht der Vereinigten Staaten, in: , , and (eds.), Börsenreform – Eine ökonomische, rechtsvergleichende und rechtspolitische Untersuchung, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, p. 755.Google Scholar
(2005), Japan Needs Real Merger Reform and Disclosure, December 2005International Financial Law Review25.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Anwendungs- und Haftungsfragen zum Deutschen Corporate Governance-Kodex, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen1569.Google Scholar
(2001), Auf dem Weg zu einem europäischen Gemeinrecht der Methode, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht4.Google Scholar
, , and (2003a), Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect, 47 Europ. Econ. Rev. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note, 45 Harv. L. Rev. 1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, revised edition, New York: Legal Classics Library, 1993.Google Scholar
(2002), Global Differences in Corporate Governance-Systems, Wiesbaden: Deutscher-Universitäts-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969), Einige Bemerkungen zur Theorie des Einflusses der Verbände auf die politische Willensbildung in der Demokratie, 22 Kyklos276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Die Entwicklung der Corporate Governance in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
(1990b), Is Corporate Law Trivial?: A Political and Economic Analysis, 84 Northwestern University Law Review542.Google Scholar
Black, Bernard S. (1997), Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance in the United States, in: (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, New York: Grove's Dictionaries, p. 459.Google Scholar
, and (1996), A Self Enforcing Model of Corporate Law, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002), Delaware's Takeover Law: The Uncertain Search for Hidden Value, 96 Nw. U. L. Rev. 521.Google Scholar
(2000) and (2001), Proceduralizing Self-Regulation (Part I and Part II), 20 O. J. L. S. 597 and 21 O. J. L. S.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Reforming Corporate Governance: What History Can Teach Us, Berkeley Bus. L.J.1.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Reform’ or ‘Opening’? Reform of China's State-Owned Enterprises and World Trade Organization Accession – The Dilemma of Applying GATT to Marketizing Economies, 16 UCLA Pac. Basin L.J.198.Google Scholar
(1996), Der Organstreit in der Kapitalgesellschaft: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zum deutschen, französischen und englischen Recht, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Bottomley, Stephan (1999), Company Law in Japan, in: (ed.), Company Law in East Asia, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 39.Google Scholar
(2006), Shareholder Protection in the USA and Germany – ‘Law and Finance’ Revisited, 7 German Law Journal257.Google Scholar
, and (2002), The Institutional Investor's Goals for Corporate Law in the Twenty-First Century, 25 Del. J. Corp. L. 35.Google Scholar
(2000), Teaching Comparative Corporate Governance: The Significance of ‘Soft Law’ and International Institutions, 34 Ga. L. Rev. 669.Google Scholar
(2001), The Very Uncertain Prospect of ‘Global’ Convergence in Corporate Governance, 34 Cornell Int'l L.J.321.Google Scholar
Branson, Douglas M. (2002), The Social Responsibility of Large Multinational Corporations, 16 Transnational Law 121.
Bratton, William W., and McCahery, Joseph A. (1999), Comparative Corporate Governance and the Theory of the Firm: The Case Against Global Cross Reference, 38 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 213 (also published in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 23).Google Scholar
, and (1988), Legal Harmonization and the Business Enterprise, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1992), Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance.Google Scholar
Campbell, David (1999), What Is Meant by ‘the Rule of Law’ in Asian Company Law Reform?, in: (ed.), Company Law in East Asia, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 11.Google Scholar
(1969), Systemdenken und Systembegriff in der Jurisprudenz, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
(2004), Regulation without Borders: The Impact of Sarbanes–Oxley on European Companies, 27 Ford. Int'l L. J.785.Google Scholar
(1997), The Political Economy of Competition for Corporate Charters, 26 J. Legal Stud. 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974), Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware, 83 Yale L.J.663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Foreign Law Firms: Implications for Professional Legal Education in Japan, 20 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht55.Google Scholar
(1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2002), An Examination of American and German Corporate Law Norms, 16 St John's J. Legal Comment. 431.Google Scholar
(1991), Competition Among Jurisdictions in Formulating Corporate Law Rules: An American Perspective on the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in the European Communities, 32 Harv. Int'l L.J.423.Google Scholar
Charny, David (2004), The Politics of Corporate Convergence, in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001a), Does Law Matter? The Separation of Ownership and Control in the United Kingdom, 30 J. Legal Stud. 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b), The Metamorphosis of ‘Germany Inc.’: The Case of Executive Pay', 49 Am. J. Comp. L. 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001c), History and the Global Corporate Governance Revolution: The UK Perspective, 43/4 Bus. Hist. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R. (2002), Putting Britain on the Roe Map: The Emergence of the Berle–Means Corporation in the United Kingdom, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 147.Google Scholar
(2003a), Law as Bedrock: The Foundations of an Economy Dominated by Widely Held Public Companies, 23 O. J. L. S.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R. (2003b), Will Executive Pay Globalise Along American Lines, 11 Corporate Governance 8 (similar version published as: Cheffins, Brian R., and Thomas, Randall S., Regulation and the Globalization (Americanization) of Executive Pay, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 155).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003c), Mergers and Corporate Ownership Structure: The United States and Germany at the Turn of the 20th Century, 51 Am. J. Comp. L. 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R. (2006), Dividends as a Substitute for Corporate Law: The Separation of Ownership and Control in the United Kingdom, 63 Washington and Lee Law Review 1273.
(1999), Towards a Legal Enlightenment: Discussions in Contemporary China on the Rule of Law, 17 UCLA Pac. Basin L.J.125.Google Scholar
(2002), European Pensions and Global Finance: Continuity or Convergence?, 7 New Political Economy67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006a), The Independent Director in Chinese Corporate Governance, 36 Del. J. Corp. L. 125.Google Scholar
Clarke, Donald (2006b), Lost in Translation? Corporate Legal Transplants in China, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=913784.
Clarke, Donald, Murrell, Peter, and Whiting, Susan (2006), The Role of Law in China's Economic Development, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=878672.
Clarke, Michael G. (1991), The Conflicts of Law Dimension, in: (ed.), Corporate Law: The European Dimension, London: Butterworths, p. 161.Google Scholar
, and (2000), Corporate-Governance-Grundsätze in Deutschland – Nützliche Orientierungshilfe oder regulatorisches Übermaϐ?, Aktiengesellschaft481.Google Scholar
(1991), Liquidity versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, John C. (1996), Organhaftung im amerikanischen Recht, in: , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance, Cologne: Otto Schmidt, p. 165.Google Scholar
(1999a), Privatization and Corporate Governance: The Lessons from Securities Market Failure, 25 J. Corp. L. 1.Google Scholar
(1999b), The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications, 93 Nw. U. L. Rev. 641.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2001), The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control, 111 Yale L.J. 1 (also published in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 663).Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2002a), Convergence and Its Critics: What Are the Preconditions to the Separation of Ownership and Control?, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 83.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2002b), Racing Towards the Top?: The Impact of Cross-Listings and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance, 102 Colum. L. Rev. 1757 (shorter version also published in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 437).Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2003), What Caused Enron?, in: , and , Corporate Governance and Capital Flows in a Global Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 29.Google Scholar
(2000), Die Organisationsverfassung der Aktiengesellschaft in China, Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde.Google Scholar
Company Law Reform (2005), Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry by Command of Her Majesty, Cm 6456, available at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/WhitePaper.pdf.
Conard, Alfred (1969), Fundamental Changes in Marketable Share Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 6.Google Scholar
Conrad, Harald (2003), Sustaining Old Age Security in Japan: Towards a New Public–Private Mix, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht 199.
Cook, Jennifer and Deakin, Simon (1999), Stakeholding and Corporate Governance: Theory and Evidence on Economic Performance, Resesarch Paper, available at www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/publications/index.htm.
(2005), The Real Difference in Corporate Law Between the United States and Continental Europe: Distribution of Powers, 30 Del. J. Corp. L. 697.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Peter, and Kogut, Bruce Mitchel (2003), Introduction, in: , and (eds.), Corporate Governance and Capital Flows in a Global Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 1.Google Scholar
Crabb, Kelly (1987), The Reality of Extralegal Barriers to Mergers and Acquisitions in Japan, 21 Int. L. 97 (also published in: (ed.), Japanese Law in Context: Readings in Society, the Economy, and Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001, p. 490).Google Scholar
Crook, Kimberley (2004), Accounting for Share-Based Remuneration, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 347.Google Scholar
(1999), Commonalities and Prescriptions in the Vertical Dimension of Global Corporate Governance, 84 Cornell L. Rev. 1133.Google Scholar
Dam, Kenneth W. (2006), China As a Test Case: Is the Rule of Law Essential for Economic Growth, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=880125.
(1991), Should Provinces Compete? The Case for a Competitive Corporate Law Market, 36 McGill Law Journal138.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L. (1997a), Institutional Investors as Corporate Monitors in the UK, in: , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance – Essays and Materials, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 47.Google Scholar
(1997b), Gower's Principles of Modern Company Law, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 6th edition.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L. (1999), United Kingdom, in: , and (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 331.Google Scholar
(2001), Struktur der Unternehmensführung in Groϐbritannien und Deutschland – Konvergenz oder fortbestehende Divergenz?, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht268 (English version in (2002) 2 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal435).Google Scholar
(2003), Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law 7th edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L. (2004), Post-Enron Developments in the United Kingdom, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 185.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L., and Hopt, Klaus J. (2004), Control Transactions, in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 157.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen M. (1999), Bridging the Accountability Gap: An Agenda for Global Share Voting Reform, in: , and (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 383.Google Scholar
, , and (eds.), The European Private Company?, Antwerp: Maklu, p. 21.
Deakin, Simon (2001), Regulatory Competition versus Harmonization in European Company Law, in: , and (eds.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 190.Google Scholar
Deminor (2005), Application of the One Share–One Vote Principle in Europe, available at www.abi.org.uk/BookShop/ResearchReports/DEMINOR_REPORT.pdf.
(2005), Building an Investor-Friendly Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit System in China, 46 Harv. Int'l L.J.347.Google Scholar
(2005), Die japanische Gesellschaftsrechtsreform 2005/2006, 20 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht123.Google Scholar
(2001), Stellungnahme zum Fragenkatalog der Regierungskommission ‘Corporate Governance – Unternehmensführung, Unternehmenskontrolle, Modernisierung des Aktienrechts’ v. 20.09.2000, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht185.Google Scholar
Dine, Janet (1995), Private Property and Corporate Governance, Part II, Content of Directors' Duties and Remedies, in: (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law, Volume 1, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 115.Google Scholar
(2005), Companies, International Trade and Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Drafting Company Law in Transition Economies, 1 Journal of Comparative Law338.Google Scholar
Dodd, Peter, and Leftwich, Richard (1980), The Market for Corporate Charters: Unhealthy Competition vs. Federal Regulation, in: , and , Economics of Corporation Law and Securities Regulation, Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, p. 100.Google Scholar
(2005), Shareholder Voice and Its Opponents, 5 Journal of Corporate Law Studies305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001), Some Comparisons Between the Model Business Corporation Act and the Delaware General Corporation Law, 56 Bus. Law. 737.Google Scholar
(2000), Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism, Japan and German versus the Anglo-Saxon, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1998), The Myth of the Global Corporation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1968), Ökonomische Theorie der Demokratie, Tübingen: Mohr (original version: An Economic Theory of Democracy, 1957).Google Scholar
(1999), Wettbewerb oder Vereinheitlichung der Rechtsordnungen in Europa?, Juristenzeitung105.Google Scholar
(1986), Rechtsvergleichung in der deutschen Rechtssprechung, 50 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht610.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (1998), The Use of Comparative Law by Courts, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Druey, Jean Nicholas (1999), General Report, in: , and (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 367.Google Scholar
(1998), The Regulation and Recognition of Foreign Corporations: Responses to the Delaware Syndrome, 57 Cambridge Law Journal165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Die Vorschläge der SLIM-Arbeitsgruppe zur Vereinfachung des Europäischen Gesellschaftsrechts, Aktiengesellschaft291.Google Scholar
(1999), Eine rechtsvergleichende Studie über Minderheitenrechte der Aktionäre sowie Stimmrechtsausübung und -vertretung in Europa, Deutsche Schutzvereinigung für Wertpapierbesitz eV.Google Scholar
(1992), L'histoire des grandes sociétés en Allemagne, en France et en Italie, Rev.int.dr.comp. 849.Google Scholar
Dunlavy, Colleen A. (1998), Corporate Governance in the Late 19th Century Europe and the US – The Case of Shareholder Voting Rights, in: , , , , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of Art and Emerging Research, Oxford: Clarendon, p. 5.Google Scholar
, and (2004), Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison, 49 Journal of Finance537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. (1996), Federalism and European Business Law, in: , , , and (eds.), European Economic and Business Law, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1991), The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1999a), Das Schicksal der Sitztheorie nach dem Centros-Urteil des EuGH, Juristenzeitung656.Google Scholar
(1999b), Unternehmensrechtsangleichung in der Europäischen Union: Brauchen wir ein European Law Institute?, Festschrift Groϐfeld189.Google Scholar
Ebke, Werner F. (2000), Accounting, Auditing and Global Capital Market, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 113.Google Scholar
(1999), European Community; Treaty establishing the European Community Company Law, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
(2004), The Directive on Takeover Bids – Not Worth the Paper It's Written On?, 1 European Company and Financial Law Review416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Rechtsanwendung, Gesetzgebung und ökonomische Analyse, 197 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis80.Google Scholar
(2001), Die neuen Vorschriften des Aktientauschs und der Aktienübertragung: Einführung und Gesetzesübersetzung, 11 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht223.Google Scholar
(2004a), Holdinggesellschaften in Japan: Entwicklung, Verbot, Wiederzulassung und aktueller Rechtsrahmen, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
(2004b), Konzerneigenschaft horizontaler japanischer Unternehmensgruppen?, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht115.Google Scholar
(1999), The Conception that the Corporation Is a Nexus of Contracts, and the Dual Nature of the Firm, 24 J. Corp. L. 819.Google Scholar
Ellett, Fiona (2000), Australia and the UK on the Quest for the Best Corporate Practice, in: (ed.), International Corporate Law, Volume 1, Oxford: Hart, p. 173.Google Scholar
, and , (1999), US-amerikanisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
(2000), The Law on Corporate Directors' Self-Dealing: A Comparative Analysis, 2 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal297.Google Scholar
Enriques, Luca (2002), Do Corporate Law Judges Matter? Some Evidence from Milan, 3 European Business Organization Law Review 765 (shorter version also published as: Off the Books, But on the Record: Evidence from Italy on the Relevance of Judges to Quality of Corporate Law, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 257).Google Scholar
(2004a), Silence Is Golden: The European Company as a Catalyst for Company Law Arbitrage, 4 Journal of Corporate Law Studies77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b), European Community; Treaty establishing the European Community Company Law and the Fears of a European Delaware, European Business Law Review1259.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Die Durchsetzung von Corporate-Governance-Regeln, Aktiengesellschaft336.Google Scholar
(2001), Reform durch Deregulierung im Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (2001), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Euroshareholders Corporate Governance Guidelines (2000), available at www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/european_shareholders.pdf.
, and (eds.) (2006), Party Funding and Campaign Financing in International Perspective, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Expert Group on Cross-Border Voting (2002), Consultative Document on Cross-Border Voting in Europe and Final Report.
Fabritius, Andreas (2004), Aktuelle Fragen des Übernahmerechts, Erfahrungen aus der Praxis, in: (ed.), Gesellschaftsrecht in der Diskussion 2003, Cologne: Otto Schmidt, p. 45.Google Scholar
(1970), Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, 25 Journal of Finance383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980), Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, 88 Journal of Political Economy288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), The Role of Corporate Law in French Corporate Governance, 31 Cornell Int'l L.J.31.Google Scholar
Faugérolas, Laurent (2003), Impact of the Takeovers and Their Regulation on French Company Law and Practice in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 327.Google Scholar
(2001), Corporate Law, Codes and Social Norms – Finding the Right Regulatory Combination and Institutional Structure, 1 Journal of Corporate Law Studies381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferran, Eílis (2003a), Legal Capital Rules and Modern Securities Markets – The Case for Reform, as Illustrated by the UK Equity Markets, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 115.Google Scholar
Ferran, Eílis (2003b), The Role of the Shareholder in Internal Corporate Governance: Enabling Shareholders to Make Better-Informed Decisions, 4 European Business Organization Law Review 491 (also published in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 417).Google Scholar
(2004), Building an European Union Securities Market, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarini, Guido (2003), Shareholder Value and the Modernisation of European Corporate Law, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 223.Google Scholar
Ferrarini Guido, and Moloney, Niamh (2004), Executive Remuneration and Corporate Governance in the European Union: Convergence, Divergence, and Reform Perspectives in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 267.Google Scholar
(2001), Grundfragen der ökonomischen Theorie im Gesellschafts- und Kapitalmarktrecht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht1.Google Scholar
(2002), Das neue Recht des Squeeze out, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht757.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Holger (2004), The Responsibility of the Management and Its Enforcement, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 373.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Verantwortlichkeit für falsche Kapitalmarktinformationen in Frankreich – das droit des marchés financiers, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft729.Google Scholar
(2002), Die Bedeutung der Unternehmensgröϐe in Japan am Beispiel der Mindestkapital- und Publizitätsregelungen, 14 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht91.Google Scholar
(2000), Rechts- und Parteifähigkeit ausländischer Gesellschaften mit Verwaltungssitz in Deutschland? – Die Sitztheorie vor dem EuGH, Der Betrieb1109.Google Scholar
(2000), Company Law Theory in Comparative Perspective: England and France, 48 Am. J. Comp. L. 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Nicholas H. D. (2006), Perception, Language and Reality in Corporate Law Theory, 17 King's College Law Journal 299.
(1996), Der Einfluss institutioneller Anleger in der Hauptversammlung, Cologne: Heymanns.Google Scholar
(1999), Der Wettbewerb der Rechtsordnungen im Internationalen Gesellschaftsrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht267.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. (1980), Ökonomische Theorie der Politik, in: et al. (eds.), Handwörterbuch der Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Stuttgart: Fischer, Volume 5, p. 658.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence (1990), Some Thoughts on Comparative Legal Culture, in: (ed.), Comparative Law and Private International Law: Essays in Honour of John Henry Merryman, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, p. 49.Google Scholar
(2001), Developing Venture Capital Laws in China: Lessons Learned from the United States, Germany and Japan, 23 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L.J.487.Google Scholar
(2005), Red Tape Casts Shadow on Cross-Border M&A, in International Financial Law Review Guide to China.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Glen S. (1988), The Liberalization of Legal Services in Japan: A US Government Negotiator's Perspective, 21 Law in Japan 5 (also published in: (ed.), Japanese Law in Context: Readings in Society, the Economy, and Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001, p. 61).Google Scholar
(1999), Der chinesische Kapitalmarkt auf dem Weg zu neuen Regelungen, Newsletter der Deutsch-Chinesischen Juristenvereinigung, 1999/2.Google Scholar
(2004), Wettbewerbsbedingungen im europäischen Gesellschaftsrecht, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung170.Google Scholar
(2005), The Structure of Regulatory Competition in European Corporate Law, 5 Journal of Corporate Law Studies247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerke, Wolfgang, Bank, Matthias, and Steiger, Max (2003), The Changing Role of Institutional Investors – A German Perspective in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 357.Google Scholar
Gessner, Volkmar (1998), Globalization and Legal Certainty, in: , and (eds.), Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 427.Google Scholar
Gessner, Volkmar and Budak, Ali Cem (1998), Introduction, in and (eds.), Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 3.Google Scholar
(1954), Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht, Volume I, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgemeinschaft (first published in 1868).Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J. (2001), Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function, 49 Am. J. Comp. L. 329 (also published in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 128).Google Scholar
Ginsburg Thomas B. (2005), The Regulation of Regulation: Judicialization, Convergence, and Divergence in Administrative Law, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 321.Google Scholar
(2002), Das Proporzwahlverfahren (cumulative voting) als Instrument der Corporate Governance, Festschrift Druey401.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Modernising Company Law’: The Government's White Paper, 66 Modern Law Review402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goergen, Marc, and Renneboog, Luc (2001), Strong Managers and Passive Institutional Investors in the UK, in: , and (eds.), The Control of Corporate Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 259.Google Scholar
, and (2000), Corporate Governance: Current Trends and Likely Developments for the Twenty-First Century, 25 Del. J. Corp. L. 683.Google Scholar
(1993), Common law und civil law: Eine überholte Unterscheidung, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht493.Google Scholar
Gordley, James (2001), Legal Reasoning: Some Parallels in Common Law and Civil Law, in: , , and (eds.), Unterschiedliche Rechtskulturen – Konvergenz des Rechtsdenkens/Different Legal Cultures – Convergence of Legal Reasoning, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 63.Google Scholar
(1991), Shareholder Initiative: A Social Choice and Game Theoretic Approach to Corporate Law, 60 U. Cin. L. Rev. 347.Google Scholar
(1994), Relational Investors: A New Look at Cumulative Voting, 94 Columbia Law Review124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Pathways to Corporate Convergence? Two Steps on the Road to Shareholder Capitalism in Germany: Deutsche Telekom and Daimler Chrysler, 5 Colum. J. Eur. L. 219.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jeffrey N. (2003), Convergence on Shareholder Capitalism: An Internationalist Perspective, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Jeffrey N. (2004), The International Relations Wedge in the Corporate Convergence Debate, in , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goshen Zohar (2003), Controlling Corporate Self-Dealing: Convergence or Path-Dependency, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, Simon (1995), The Private Company in the United Kingdom, in: , and (eds.), The European Private Company?, Antwerp: Maklu, p. 55.Google Scholar
Grant, Wyn (2000), Globalisation, Big Business and the Blair Government, CSGR Working Paper No. 58/00, available at www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/abstracts/abwp5800/.
(1998), The Doctrinal Basis of the Rights of Company Shareholders, 57 Cambridge Law Journal554.Google Scholar
Groϐfeld, Bernhard (1971), Management and Control of Marketable Share Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 4.Google Scholar
(1995), Internationales und Europäisches Unternehmensrecht. Das Organisationsrecht transnationaler Unternehmen, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
(2002), Cross-Border Mergers: Corporate Accounting/Corporate Valuation, 101 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft1.Google Scholar
Groϐfeld, Bernhard, and Deilmann, Barbara (1990), Historische und gegenwärtige Entwicklungen im deutschen Aktienrecht, in: , , , , , , and (eds.), Die Japanisierung des westlichen Rechts, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 255.Google Scholar
Groϐkommentar zum AktG (1992–) (eds. Hopt, Klaus J., and Wiedemann, Herbert), 4th edition, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Group of German Experts on Corporate Law (2002), Stellungnahme zum Konsultationsdokument der High Level Group on Corporate Law, available at www.jura.uni-duesseldorf.de/dozenten/noack/texte/sonstige/hlg.pdf.
Grundmann, Stefan (2001), Wettbewerb der Regelgeber im Europäischen Gesellschaftsrecht – jedes Marktsegment hat seine Struktur, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 783 (English version: Regulatory Competition in European Company Law – Some Different Genius?, in: , , and (eds.), Capital Markets in the Age of the Euro, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002, p. 561).Google Scholar
, and (2003), Die Goldene Aktie und der Markt für Unternehmenskontrolle im Rechtsvergleich – insbesondere Staatskontrolle, Höchst- und Mehrfachstimmrechte sowie Übernahmemaϐnahmen, 102 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft289.Google Scholar
(2001), Global Shares of German Corporations and Their Dual Listings on the Frankfurt and New York Stock Exchanges, 22 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 185.Google Scholar
(2006), Foreign Buyers Get First Bite at G-share Market, February 2006 International Financial Law Review 41.Google Scholar
(2001), The Rules of Good Corporate Governance and the Methods of Efficient Implementation: A Nigerian Perspective, 22 Comp. Law. 119.Google Scholar
(1995), Wandelschuldverschreibungen und Optionsanleihen im französischen Recht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht208.Google Scholar
Guyon, Yves (1998), Zur Gestaltungsfreiheit im französischen Gesellschaftsrecht, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyon, Yves (1999), France, in: , and (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 95.Google Scholar
(2001), Aktienrecht und Internet, 165 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht172.Google Scholar
Haley, John O. (1988), Redefining the Scope of Practice under Japan's New Regime for Regulating Foreign Lawyers, 21 Law in Japan 18 (also published in: (ed.), Japanese Law in Context: Readings in Society, the Economy, and Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001, p. 58).Google Scholar
(2001), International Banking Regulation into the 21st Century: Flirting with Revolution, 21 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 41.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Corporate Democracy and Stockholder-Adopted By-Laws: Taking Back the Street?, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 409.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Robert W. (1992), Corporations, 3rd edition, St Paul, MN: West.
(2001), Proxy-Voting, Remote-Voting und Online-HV – § 134 III 3 AktG nach dem NaStraG, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht355.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier (2001), The End of History for Corporate Law, 88 Geo. L.J. 439 (also published in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 33, also published as: Towards a Single Model of Corporate Law? in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 56).Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier (2004), What Is Corporate Law?; Agency Problems and Legal Strategies; The Basic Governance Structure, all in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1, 21 and 33.Google Scholar
(2003), The Public Interest Theory of Regulation: Non-Existence or Misinterpretation?, 15 Europ. J. Law & Econ. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Abwehr feindlicher Übernahmen in den USA, 100 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft275.Google Scholar
(2000), Die französischen Société par Actions Simplifiée – eine zukunftsweisende Gesellschaftsform, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen1530.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Motomi (2002), Commercial Code Revisions: Promoting the Evolution of Japanese Companies, Nomura Research Institute Paper No. 48, available at www.nri.co.jp/english/opinion/papers/index.html.
(1992), Die Bedeutung von Delaware für das US-amerikanische Gesellschaftsrecht, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft539.Google Scholar
(2004), Common Trajectories, Variable Paces, Divergent Outcomes? Models of European Capitalism under Conditions of Complex Economic Interdependence, 11 Review of International Political Economy231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), Die Aktionärsklage im japanischen Gesellschaftsrecht, Festschrift Mestmäcker891.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, Masara (1997), Shareholders in Japan: Attitudes, Conduct, Legal Rights, and Their Enforcement, in: (ed.), Japan: Economic Success and Legal System, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Die Reform des Gesellschaftsrecht vom Mai 2002 und Corporate Governance in Japan, 14 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht31.Google Scholar
(2003), Die Neuregelung von Verschmelzung, Spaltung und Gründung von Holding-Gesellschaften, 16 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht59.Google Scholar
, and (1992), Japanische Gesellschaftsrechtsreform: Teilnovelle 1991 zum Aktien- und GmbH-Recht, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft282.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von (1978), Competition as a Discovery Procedure, in: (ed.), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, Chicago: Chicago University Press, p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian (2001a), Der chinesische Aktienmarkt (I). Staatliche Regulierung und institutioneller Wandel, Working Paper China Analysis No. 3, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Heilmann, Sebastian (2001b), Der chinesische Aktienmarkt (II). Schlüsselakteure und inoffizielle Spielregeln, Working Paper China Analysis No. 4, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
, and (2002), European Corporate Laws, Regulatory Competition and Path Dependence, 13 Europ. J. Law & Econ. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), Can Securities Law Approaches Be Harmonised with Essential Principles of Company Law?, European Business Law Review60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Angleichung des Gesellschaftsrechts in Europa – Notwendigkeit, Schwerpunkte und Wege aus der Sicht des Kapitalmarkts, Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht580.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Hans-Jürgen (2005), The Transatlantic Financial Markets Regulatory Dialogue, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 363.Google Scholar
Henle, Walter (1999), Neue gesetzliche Grundlagen für das Shareholder-Value-Denken in Deutschland, in: (ed.), The International Lawyer, Freundesgabe für Wulf H. Döser, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 161.Google Scholar
Hertig, Gérard (2000), Western Europe's Corporate Governance Dilemma, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 265.Google Scholar
Hertig, Gérard (2004), Convergence of Substantive Law and Convergence of Enforcement: A Comparison, in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertig, Gérard, and Kanda, Hideki (2004), Creditor Protection; Related Party Transactions, both in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71 and 101.Google Scholar
Hertig, Gérard, Kraakman, Reinier, and Rock, Edward (2004), Issuers and Investor Protection, in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 193.Google Scholar
Higgott, Richard, and Reich, Simon (1998), Globalisation and Sites of Conflict: Towards Definition and Taxonomy, CSGR Working Paper, available at www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/abstracts/1/.
High Level Group of Company Law Experts (2002), A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe, available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/docs/modern/report_en.pdf.
Hill, Jennifer (2000a), Public Beginnings, Private Ends – Should Corporate Law Privilege the Interest of Shareholders, in: (ed.), International Corporate Law, Volume 1, Oxford: Hart, p. 17.Google Scholar
(1974), Abwanderung und Widerspruch, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (English version: Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Hirte, Heribert (1998), Die aktienrechtliche Satzungsstrenge: Kapitalmarkt und sonstige Legitimation versus Gestaltungsfreiheit, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirte, Heribert (2000), Der Einfluss neuer Informationstechniken auf das Gesellschaftsrecht und die corporate-governance-Debatte, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 283.Google Scholar
Hirte, Heribert (2003), Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht, 4th edition, Cologne: RWS Kommunikationsforum.
(2000), Minderheitenschutz und Recht der Aktionäre in Europa, Festschrift Bezzenberger147.Google Scholar
, , , and (1995), Englisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
(1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills: Sage (2nd edition: Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, 2003).Google Scholar
Hommelhoff, Peter (1985), Eigenkontrolle statt Staatskontrolle, in: , and (eds.), Hundert Jahre modernes Aktienrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a), Anlegerinformationen im Aktien-, Bilanz- und Kapitalmarktrecht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht748.Google Scholar
(2000b), Das Unternehmensrecht vor den Herausforderungen der Globalisierung, Festschrift Lutter95.Google Scholar
(1976), Vom Aktien- und Börsenrecht zum Kapitalmarktrecht? – Teil 1, 140 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht201.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (1980), Ideelle und wirtschaftliche Grundlagen der Aktien-, Bank- und Börsenrechtsentwicklung im 19. Jahrhundert, in: , and (eds.), Wissenschaft und Kodifiation des Privatrechts im 19. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt (Main): Klostermann, p. 128.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (1985), Self-Dealing and Use of Corporate Opportunity and Information: Regulating Directors' Conflicts of Interest, in: , and , Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (1992), Directors' Duties to Shareholders, Employees, and Other Creditors: A View from the Continent, in: , Commercial Aspects of Trust and Fiduciary Obligations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 115.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (1998a), Gestaltungsfreiheit im Gesellschaftsrecht in Europa. Generalbericht, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (2000), Common Principles of Corporate Governance in Europe?, in: (ed.), Millennium Lectures, Oxford: Hart, p. 105 (also published in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 175; and in German in (2000) Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 779).Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (2002b), Unternehmensführung, Unternehmenskontrolle, Modernisierung des Aktienrechts – Zum Bericht der Regierungskommission Corporate Governance, in: , , , , and (eds.), Aktienrecht für globale Kapitalmärkte, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft, p. 27.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (2004), Trusteeship and Conflicts of Interest in Corporate, Banking and Agency Law: Towards Common Legal Principles for Intermediaries in the Modern Service-Oriented Society, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 51.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J., and Wymeersch, Eddy (2003), Preface, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (eds.) (2005), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horioka, Charles Yuji (2001), Japan's Public Pension System in the Twenty First Century, in: , , and , Japan's New Economy: Continuity and Change in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 99.Google Scholar
Horn, Norbert (1979), Aktienrechtliche Unternehmensorganisation in der Hochindustrialisierung, in: , and , Recht und Entwicklung der Groϐunternehmen im neunzehnten und frühen zwanzigsten Jahrhundert, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, p. 123.Google Scholar
(2005), Regulation of Companies with Publicly Listed Share Capital in the People's Republic of China, 38 Cornell Int'l L.J.237.Google Scholar
(2005), China's Takeover Law: A Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Reform, 30 Del. J. Corp. L. 145.Google Scholar
Hulle, Karel van (1994), Gesellschaftsrecht, in: (ed.), EG-Handbuch Recht im Binnenmarkt, 2nd edition, Herne: Neue Wirtschafts-Briefe, p. 395.Google Scholar
(1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.Google Scholar
(1999), Keynote Address, in: The Colorado College (ed.), Cultures in the 21st Century: Conflicts and Convergences, 32 Colorado College Studies1.Google Scholar
(2004), Classification of Legal Families Today: Is It Time for a Memorial Hymn, Rev.int.dr.comp. 11.Google Scholar
(2001), Namensaktien, Internet und die Zukunft der Stimmrechtsvertretung, Aktiengesellschaft68.Google Scholar
(2001), Where Are We Going?: The Process of Change in Japanese Corporate Governance, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht69.Google Scholar
Immenga, Ulrich (1985), Company Systems and Affiliation, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 7.Google Scholar
, and (1987), Aktionär und Aktiengesellschaft in Japan, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft13.Google Scholar
(1999), Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership, 62 Modern Law Review32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Über die Stellung der ausländischen Rechtsanwälte in Japan, 19 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht19.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Tracking Stock: A European Perspective, 8 Journal of International Banking and Financial Law372.Google Scholar
(2000), Corporate Governance in Comparative Perspective: Prospects of Convergence, 22 Comp. L. L. & Pol'y J. 5.Google Scholar
(2002), The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2001), Verarbschiedete Gesetzes: Berichte über die 151. und 152. Sitzungsperiode des Japanischen Parlaments, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht249.Google Scholar
, , , and (2002), New Rules for Share Structure and Governance of Japanese Corporations, 13 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht253.Google Scholar
(2003), Die kulturelle Dimension des Rechts – ihre Bedeutung für das Internationale Privatrecht und die Rechtsvergleichung, 67 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeover, 76 Am. Econ. Rev.323.Google Scholar
, and (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3 J. Finan. Econ. 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Christian (2003), On the Legitimacy of European Private Law, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 7.3, available at www.ejcl.org/73/art73-3.html.
(2002), German Corporate Culture in the Twenty-First Century: The Interrelation between the End of Germany Inc. and Germany's Corporate Capital Gains Tax Reform, 11 Minnesota Journal of Global Trade69.Google Scholar
(1998), A Regulatory Competition Theory of Indeterminacy in Corporate Law, 98 Columbia Law Review 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, Hideki (1997), Trends in Japanese Corporate Governance, in: , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance – Essays and Materials, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 185.Google Scholar
Kanda, Hideki (2000), Globalization of Capital Markets: A Perspective from Japan, in: , and (eds.), Legal Aspects of Globalization, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 69.Google Scholar
(2004), Understanding Recent Trends Regarding the Liability of Managers and Directors in Japanese Corporate Law, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht29.Google Scholar
Kawamoto, Ichiro (1994), Handels- und Gesellschaftsrecht, in: , and , Japanisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, New York: de Gruyter, p. 47.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2001), Japan, Corporations and Partnerships, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Keidanren (2001), A Proposal for Better Corporate Accounting, available at www.keidanren.or.jp/english/policy/2001/013.html.
(1987), The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Choice of Law – A Comparison of the United States and European Systems and a Proposal for a European Directive, 28 Brooklyn Journal of International Law1.Google Scholar
(1998), Leitungskompetenz und Leitungsverantwortung im deutschen, US-amerikanischen und japanischen Aktienrecht, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft602.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard (1993), in: (ed.), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
(2002), Wettbewerb der Privatrechtsordnungen im Europäischen Binnenmarkt, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
(2001), Taking International Soft Law Seriously: Its Implications for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance, Journal of Korean Law1.Google Scholar
(2001), Legal System and Legal Culture in Japan, 11 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht7.Google Scholar
(2001), Demokratie ohne parlamentarische Gesetzgebung?, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift1332.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Christian (2003), Shareholder Value: A New Standard for Company Conduct in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 341.Google Scholar
(1997), Global Gadflies: Applications and Implications of US-Style Corporate Governance Abroad, 17 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L.621Google Scholar
(1998), Die Europäisierung des Privatrechts: Der EuGH als Zivilrichter, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Kleindiek, Detlef (2003), Die Zukunft der Rechnungslegung in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen, in: (ed.), Gesellschaftsrecht in der Diskussion 2002, Cologne: Otto Schmidt, p. 3.Google Scholar
(2002), Die Bedeutung des Zivil- und Wirtschaftsrechts – Rechtssystem für Direktinvestionen in der VR China, 101 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft220.Google Scholar
(2001a), Rechtsvergleichende Anmerkungen zum japanischen Verschmelzungs- und Spaltungsrecht, 11 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht65.Google Scholar
(2001b), Änderungen des Handelsgesetzes mit Wirkung zum 1. Oktober 2001, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht139.Google Scholar
(1999), International Codes of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility, 8 Transnational Corporation143.Google Scholar
Kölner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (1986–) (ed. Zöllner, Wolfgang), 2nd edition, Köln: Heymanns.
Komiyama, Makoto, and Masaoka, Yukinobu (2002), Corporate Governance: A New Phase for Japanese Companies, Nomura Research Institute Paper No. 47, available at www.nri.co.jp/english/opinion/papers/index.html.
(2002), Ringbeteiligungen von Aktiengesellschaften: Gesellschafts- und kartellrechtliche Aspekte, Cologne: Heymanns.Google Scholar
(1986), Rechtsvereinheitlichung – Nutzen, Kosten, Methoden, Ziele, 50 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht1.Google Scholar
(1992), Alternativen zur legislatorischen Rechtsvereinheitlichung, 56 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht215.Google Scholar
(1998), Abschied von der Rechtskreislehre?, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht493.Google Scholar
(2000), Der Bundesgerichtshof und die Rechtsvergleichung, Festgabe 50 Jahre Bundesgerichtshof, Volume II, p. 825.Google Scholar
(2001), The Reformation of Corporate Law in Japan and the Use of Information and Communication Technology, European Business Law Review318.Google Scholar
(2003), The Use of Stock Options as Defensive Measures: The Impact of the 2001 Amendments to the Corporate Law on Corporate Controls in Japan, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht135.Google Scholar
(2006), Recent Developments in Takeover Law: Changes in Business Practices Meet Decade-Old Rule, 21 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht5.Google Scholar
Kraakman, Reinier (2004), Disclosure and Corporate Governance: An Overview Essay, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 95.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ernst A. (2001), Konvergenz und Internationalisierung der juristischen Methode, in: , , and (eds.), Unterschiedliche Rechtskulturen – Konvergenz des Rechtsdenkens/Different Legal Cultures – Convergence of Legal Reasoning, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 31.Google Scholar
(2002), Das Unternehmensinteresse als Verhaltensmaxime der Leitungsorgane der Aktiengesellschaft im Rahmen der Organhaftung, Berlin: Tenea.Google Scholar
(1980), Intersystemare Kooperationen und Anpassungsprozesse zwischen westlichen und östlichen Wirtschaftssystemen, Frankfurt: R. G. Fischer.Google Scholar
(1998), Gesellschaftsrecht: die privatrechtlichen Ordnungsstrukturen und Regelungsprobleme von Verbänden und Unternehmen, 5th edition, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
(2003), NGOs, the Internet and International Economic Policy Making – The Failure of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Multilateral Agreement on Investment, 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law213.Google Scholar
, , and (1999), Corporate Ownership around the World, 54 Journal of Finance471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2000a), Agency Problems and Dividend Policies Around the World, 55 Journal of Finance1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2000b), Investor Protection and Corporate Governance, 58 J. Finan. Econ. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Nature v. Nurture: Evolution, Path Dependence and Corporate Governance, 18 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 279.Google Scholar
Ladeur, Karl-Heinz (2003), Globalisation and the Conversion of Democracy to Polycentric Networks, EUI Working Paper, available at http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/bitstream/1814/199/1/law03-4.pdf.
, and (1995), Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 3rd edition, Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization, Lanham: National Book Network.Google Scholar
Latham, Mark (1999a), Corporate Governance in Japan: A Future Scenario, available at www.corpmon.com/publications.htm.
Latham, Mark (1999b), The Road to Shareholder Power, available at www.corpmon.com/publications.htm.
Latham, Mark (2000), The Internet Will Drive Corporate Monitoring, available at www.corpmon.com/publications.htm.
Latham, Mark (2001), Democracy and Infomediaries, available at www.corpmon.com/publications.htm.
(1999), People's Republic of China: The New Shanghai Stock Exchange Listing Rules: An Egg Hatched or an Egg within an Egg, 20 Comp. Law. 243.Google Scholar
(1995), Private Property and Corporate Governance, Part I: Defining the Interests, in: Macmillan (Patfield), Fiona (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law: Volume 1, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 85.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Governance: What Can Be Learned from Japan?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001), Recent Amendments to the Commercial Code of Japan: Impact on Mergers & Acquisitions, 32 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 811.Google Scholar
(1996), European Legal Systems Are Not Converging, 45 International and Comparative Law Quarterly53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), The Impossibility of Legal Transplants, 4 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Paradoxically, Derrida: For a Comparative Legal Studies, 27 Cardozo Law Review631.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Jürgen (1990), Missbrauch des Auskunfts-, Frage- und Rederechts, in: (ed.), Missbräuchliches Aktionärsverhalten, Cologne: RWS-Forum, p. 51.Google Scholar
, and (2007), Shareholder Protection: A Leximetric Approach, 17Journal of Corporate Law Studies 17.Google Scholar
(2003), Corporate Governance the American way?, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 98Google Scholar
Leung, Erika, Liu, Lily, Shen, Lu, Taback, Kevin, and Wang, Leo (2002), Financial Reform and Corporate Governance in China, Working Paper, available at http://mitsloan.mit.edu/50th/pdf/corpgovchinapaper.pdf.
(1998), International Diversity in Securities Regulation: Roadblocks on the Way to Convergence, 20 Cardozo Law Review227.Google Scholar
(2001a), The Mother of All Path Dependencies: Towards a Cross-Cultural Theory of Corporate Governance-Systems, 26 Del. J. Corp. L. 147.Google Scholar
(2001b), David's Dilemma: A Case Study of Securities Regulation in a Small Open Market, 2/2 Theoretical Inquiries in Law5.Google Scholar
(2004a), Legal Plug-Ins: Cultural Distance, Cross-Listing, and Corporate Governance Reform, 22 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 195.Google Scholar
(2004b), The Maximands of Corporate Governance: A Theory of Values and Cognitive Style, 29 Del. J. Corp. L. 649.Google Scholar
Licht, Amir N., Goldschmidt, Chanan, and Schwartz, Shalom H. (2001), Culture, Law, and Finance: Cultural Dimensions of Corporate Governance Laws, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=277613.
, and (2005), Culture, Law, and Corporate Governance, 25 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Election Contest in the Company's Proxy: An Idea Whose Time Has Not Come, 59 Bus. Law. 67.Google Scholar
Liu, Lawrence S. (2001), Chinese Characteristics Compared: A Legal and Policy Perspective of Corporate Finance and Governance in Taiwan and China, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=273174.
Lombardo, Davide, and Pagano, Marco (2000), Legal Determinants of the Return on Equity, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=209310.
Lowenstein, Louis (1999), Corporate Governance and the Voice of the Paparazzi, Working Paper No. 132, Center for Law and Economic Studies, Columbia University School of Law, available http://ssrn.com/abstract=163386.
(2001), The End of History for Corporate Governance or Just Another Moment in Time, 19 C&SLJ305.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997), Ethik in internationalen Beziehungen, in: , and (eds.), Eine Welt – eine Moral?, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, p. 156.Google Scholar
Lutter, Marcus (1991), Anteilseigner und Unternehmen, in: , and (eds.), Rechtsgrundlagen freiheitlicher Unternehmenswirtschaft, Cologne: Otto Schmidt, p. 15.Google Scholar
Lutter, Marcus (1998a), Limited Liability Companies and Private Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 2.Google Scholar
(2000), The Purpose of Company Law and Company Lawyers in a Global Arena, 21 Comp. Law. 56.Google Scholar
MacNeil, Iain G. (2000), Competition and Convergence in Corporate Regulation: The Case of Overseas Listed Companies, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=278508.
, and (2001), International Corporate Regulation: Listing Rules and Overseas Companies, 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006), ‘Comply or Explain’: Market Discipline and Non-Compliance with the Combined Code, 14 Corporate Governance486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, Maria, and Andersson, Thomas (2002), Corporate Governance: Effects on Firm Performance and Economic Growth, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 386.Google Scholar
(2003), Corporate Governance-Systeme, Funktionen und Entwicklung am Beispiel von Deutschland und Groϐbritannien, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
(1965), Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control, 73 Journal of Political Economy110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marini, Philippe (1996), La modernisation du droit des sociétés. Rapport au premier ministre (‘Marini Report’).
(1994), The Gradual Convergence: Foreign Ideas, Foreign Influences, and English Law on the Eve of the 21st Century, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1971), Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1995), Historischer Überblick über das Aktienrecht Japans, 94 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft283.Google Scholar
(1959), Das neue japanische Aktienrecht, 24 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht115.Google Scholar
McCormack, Gerard (1998), Institutional Shareholders and the Promotion of Good Governance, in: (ed.), The Realm of Company Law, London: Kluwer Law, p. 131.Google Scholar
(2000) Company Law and the New Millennium: Some Cautionary Tales from the Past, 21 Comp. Law. 57.Google Scholar
(2002), Convergence in Corporate Governance – Possible, But Not Desirable, 47 Villanova Law Review341.Google Scholar
McGrew, Anthony G. (1998), Global Legal Internationalization and Present-Day Patterns of Globalization, in: , and (eds.), Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 325.Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company (2002), Global Investor Opinion Survey on Corporate Governance.
Meier-Schatz, Christian (1991), American Legal Harmonization from a European Perspective, in: (ed.), European Business Law: Legal and Economic Analyses on Integration and harmonization, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendiola, Alfredo, and O'Hara, Maureen (2003), Taking Stock in Stock Markets: The Changing Governance of Exchanges, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=431580.
(1991), US-amerikanisches Gesellschaftsrecht, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft (2nd edition, 2006, together with Stephan R. Göthel).Google Scholar
(1995), Das Europäische Gesellschaftsrecht und die Idee des ‘Wettbewerbs der Gesetzgeber’, 59 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht545.Google Scholar
Merkt, Hanno (2000), Die Geschichte der Namensaktie, in: , and (eds.), Die Namensaktie, Eschborn: DAI, p. 63.Google Scholar
Merkt, Hanno (2001a), Liberalisierung des europäischen Binnenmarktes durch Angleichung des Gesellschaftsrechts, in: , , , , and (eds.), Regulierung – Deregulierung – Liberalisierung, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 321.Google Scholar
(2004a), Die Pluralisierung des europäischen Gesellschaftsrechts, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft1.Google Scholar
Merkt, Hanno (2004b), Disclosing Disclosure: Europe's Winding Road to Competitive Standards of Publication of Company-Related Information, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 115.Google Scholar
(2004c), European Company Law Reform: Struggling for a More Liberal Approach 1 European Company and Financial Law Review3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), The Loneliness of the Comparative Lawyer, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
(1991), Vergleichender Überblick über das Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften in Frankreich, Deutsches Steuerrecht1563.Google Scholar
(2000), Unresponsive Shareholders in Public Companies, Dial ‘M’ for Motivate, 21 Comp. Law. 142.Google Scholar
(2003), Company Stakeholders: Their Position under the New Framework, 24 Company Lawyer56.Google Scholar
(1996), A Relational Theory of Japanese Corporate Governance: Contract, Culture, and the Rule of Law, 37 Harv. Int'l L.J.3.Google Scholar
Milhaupt, Curtis J. (1998), Property Rights in Firms, 84 Virginia Law Review 1145 (also published in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 210).Google Scholar
(2001), Creative Norm Destruction: The Evolution of Nonlegal Rules in Japanese Corporate Governance, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), On the (Fleeting) Existence of the Main Bank System and Other Japanese Economic Institutions, 27 Law and Social Inquiry425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), In the Shadow of Delaware? The Rise of Hostile Takeovers in Japan, 105 Columbia Law Review2171.Google Scholar
Milhaupt, Curtis J., and West, Mark D. (2003a), Institutional Change and M&A in Japan: Diversity Through Deals, Center for Law and Economic Studies, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003b), Is the Japanese Bureaucracy Hollowing Out? Evidence from the Market for Legal Talent, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht5.Google Scholar
(1998), Political Structure and Corporate Governance: Some Points of Contrast Between the United States and England, Columbia Business Law Review51.Google Scholar
(2001), Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions in Europe: Reforming Barriers to Takeovers, Columbia Business Law Review683.Google Scholar
, and (2002a), The Fable of the Keiretsu, 11 Journal of Economics and Management Strategy169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002b), The Myth of the Main Bank: Japan and Comparative Corporate Governance, 27 Law and Social Inquiry401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005a), Does Relationship Banking Matter? The Myth of the Japanese Main Bank, 2 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miwa, Yoshiro and Ramseyer, Mark (2005b), The Multiple Roles of Banks? Convenient Tales from Modern Japan, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 527.Google Scholar
Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy (1999), Developing the Framework, Presented by the Company Law Steering Group (UK), available at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/modcolaw.htm.
Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Final Report (2001), Presented by the Company Law Steering Group (UK), available at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/final_report/index.htm.
Modernising Company Law (2002), Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry by Command of Her Majesty, Cm 5553, available at www.dti.gov.uk/companiesbill/whitepaper.htm.
(2003), Rumble in the Boardroom? The Change of Japanese Corporate Governance Schemes, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht142.Google Scholar
(2000), French Corporate Governance in the New Millennium: Who Watches the Board in Corporate France?, 6 Colum. J. Eur. L. 73.Google Scholar
(1997), Anlegerschutz durch Aktien- und Kapitalmarktrecht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht334.Google Scholar
(1996a), Aktiengesellschaft, Unternehmensgruppe und Kapitalmarkt, 2nd edition, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(1996b), Empfehlen sich gesetzliche Regelungen zur Einschränkung des Einflusses der Kreditinstitute auf Aktiengesellschaften? Gutachten E für den 61. Deutschen Juristentag, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(1997), Shareholder Value aus rechtlicher Sicht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht129.Google Scholar
(2003), Die Abschwächungen des mitgliedschaftlichen Bestandsschutzes im Aktienrecht, Festschrift Ulmer433.Google Scholar
(2000), Systemwettbewerb, Harmonisierung und Wettbewerbsverzerrung, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
(1929), Umgestaltung der Aktiengesellschaft zur Kerngesellschaft verantwortungsvoller Groϐaktionäre, Berlin: Heymann.Google Scholar
Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (2000–), 2nd edition, Munich: Beck.
Myners, Paul (2001), Institutional Investment in the UK: A Review, available at www.hm-treasury.gov.uk./Documents/Financial_Services/Securities_and_Investments/fin_sec_mynfinal.cfm.
Myners, Paul (2005) Pre-emption Rights: Final Report, available at www.dti.gov.uk/files/file28436.pdf.
, and (eds.) (2002), Globalisierung des Rechts II: Internationale Organisationen und Regelungsbereiche, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Narusawa, Takashi, Emori, Masafumi, and Ohmori, Satoshi (2001), Rebirth of Japanese Companies Through Governance Reforms, Nomura Research Institute Paper No. 25, available at www.nri.co.jp/english/opinion/papers/index.html.
(2003), Private Acquisitions by Foreign Investors in China: Is the Party Finally Over?, China Law & Practice, April 2003, 13.Google Scholar
Neyer, Jürgen (1998), Binding Territoriality and Functionality? Globalization Meets the Law, in: , and (eds.), Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 401.Google Scholar
(1999), Entwicklungen im Aktienrecht 1999/2000, Frankfurt (Main): Deutsches Aktieninstitut.Google Scholar
(2000b), Die organisierte Stimmrechtsvertretung auf Hauptversammlungen – insbesondere durch die Gesellschaft, Festschrift Lutter1463.Google Scholar
Noack, Ulrich (2002a), Zukunft der Hauptversammlung – Hauptversammlung der Zukunft, in: , Die virtuelle Hauptversammlung, Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, p. 13.Google Scholar
(2002c), Neuerungen im Recht der Hauptversammlung durch das Transparenz- und Publizitätsgesetz und den Deutschen Corporate Governance-Kodex, Der Betrieb620.Google Scholar
(2002d), Grenzüberschreitende Stimmrechtsausübung – Ein Abenteuer im Binnenmarkt, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen68.Google Scholar
(2003), Hauptversammlung der Aktiengesellschaft und moderne Kommunikationstechnik – aktuelle Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht241.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Die Legitimation der Aktionäre bei Globalaktien und Depotverbuchung, Aktiengesellschaft651.Google Scholar
, and (2001), A By-product of the Globalization Process: The Rise of Cross Border Bank Mergers and Acquisitions – The US Framework, 56 Bus. Law. 591.Google Scholar
(2001), Japanese Corporate Governance at a Crossroads: Variation in Varieties of Capitalism?, 27 N.C. J. Int'l & Com. Reg. 255.Google Scholar
Nunnenkamp, Peter (2006), Liberalisation and Regulation of International Capital Flows: Where the Opposites Meet, in , and (eds.), The Regulation of International Financial Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996), Corporation and Other Business Associations, 2nd edition, Boston: Little, Brown and Company (3rd edition, 1999).Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Law Reform in Japan 2001/2002: Deregulation of Company Law?, 14 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht5.Google Scholar
(2005), Comprehensive Overhaul of the Securities and Exchange Law: The Draft on the Trading of Financial Products of 2006, 21 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht225.Google Scholar
(1999), Competition between National Legal Systems: A Contribution to Economic Analysis to Comparative Law, 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, Anthony (2000), Self-Regulation, in: , and (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume V, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 587.Google Scholar
Ogus, Anthony (2002), Comparing Regulatory Systems, Working Paper, available at www.competition-regulation.org.uk/publications/working_papers/wp35.pdf, now also published in: , and (eds.), International Handbook on Privatization, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, Ch. 23.Google Scholar
(1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(2000), Centros Revisited: Assessing the Impact on Corporate Organisation in Europe, International Company and Commercial Law Review407.Google Scholar
Ommeslaghe, Pierre Van (1990), Capital and Securities of Marketable Share Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 5 I.Google Scholar
, and (1999), A Comparative Study of the Fundamental Elements of Chinese and English Company Law, 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Breaking on Through to the Other Side: Understanding Continental European Corporate Governance, 22 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 975.Google Scholar
(2002), Americanization of Stock Corporation Laws Around the World and Shareholders' Derivative Suits as a Forgotten Element Therein, 13 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht29.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, Mary (2001), Change and Continuity in the French System of Corporate Governance, Working Paper, available at www.insead.fr/projects/cgep/Research/NationalSystems/NSCGFR0101without.pdf.
Pagano, Marco (2002), The Performance of European Stock Exchanges: Evidence from Listing Decisions, in: , , and (eds.), Capital Markets in the Age of the Euro, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 297.Google Scholar
, and (2005), The Political Economy of Corporate Governance, 95 Amer. Econ. Rev.1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Delaware Corporate Law: Entstehungsgeschichte und Gründe für den Führungsanspruch im US-Gesellschaftsrecht, 101 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft200.Google Scholar
(2001), Neue Institionenökonomik und politische Institutionen, Frankfurt (Main): Lang.Google Scholar
(1998), Corporate Governance: The End of ‘L'exception Francaise’?, Columbia Business Law Review79.Google Scholar
(2002), The New Foreign Investment Guidelines and Market Reform in China, China Law & Practice, April 2002, 19.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Vorzugsaktien vor dem Hintergrund der Corporate Governance-Diskussion, Aktiengesellschaft57.Google Scholar
(1994), Vereinigtes Königreich, in: Jura Europae, Droit des societés, Munich: Gesellschaftsrecht, Beck.Google Scholar
(2003), American Corporate Reform Abroad: Sarbanes–Oxley and the Foreign Private Issuer, 4 European Business Organization Law Review213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piϐler, Benjamin (2001), Zur Rolle der Rechtsprechung im chinesischen Aktienmarkt. Erste Welle von Schadensersatzklagen chinesischer Anleger, Working Paper China Analysis No. 10, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Piϐler, Benjamin (2002a), Zur Rolle der Rechtsprechung im chinesischen Aktienmarkt: ein UpdateWorking Paper China Analysis No. 12, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Piϐler, Benjamin (2002b), Corporate Governance in der VR China: Neue Vorschriften für börsenzugelassene Gesellschaften-, Zur Rolle der Rechtsprechung im chinesischen Aktienmarkt: ein Update, Working Paper China Analysis No. 17, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Piϐler, Benjamin (2002c), Schritte zur Öffnung des chinesischen Kapitalmarkts für ausländische Anleger: Übertragung von staatseigenen Aktien und QFII-Methode, Working Paper China Analysis No. 19, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Piϐler, Benjamin (2002d), Übersetzung mit Anmerkungen zu den Mitteilungen über den Erlass des ‘Standards der Corporate Governance börsenzugelassener Gesellschaften’, available at www.jura.uni-goettingen.de/chinarecht/020107.htm.
(2002), The Standardization of Law and Its Effect on Developing Economies, 50 Am. J. Comp. L. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, Katharina, Keinan, Yoram, Kleinheisterkamp, Jan, and West, Mark D. (2001), The Evolution of Corporate Law, Working Paper, available at www.worldbank.org/wdr/2001/bkgroundpapers/pistor.pdf.
, , , and (2002), The Evolution of Corporate Law, U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 751 (shorter version of the 2001 Working Papers).Google Scholar
, , and (2000), Law and Finance in Transition Economies, 8 Economics of Transition325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), Aktionärsklagen im französischen und deutschen Recht unter Einbeziehung der neueren Rechtsentwicklung in Belgien, Frankfurt (Main): Lang.Google Scholar
, , and (2002), Revising the Japanese Commercial Code: A Summary and Evaluation of the Reform Effort, Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs71.Google Scholar
(1994), Logik der Forschung, 10th edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (1st edition: 1934).Google Scholar
(1987), Das Elend des Historizismus, 6th edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (English: The Poverty of Historicism, 1947).Google Scholar
(1992), Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde (2 Volumes), Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 7th edition (English: The Open Society and Its Enemies, 1958).Google Scholar
(1973), Objektive Erkenntnis, Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe (English: Objective Knowledge, 1972).Google Scholar
(1993), The Rise of the Political Model of Corporate Governance and Corporate Control, 68 N.Y.U. L. Rev.1003.Google Scholar
(1995), The Promise of the Governed Corporation: The Limits of Economic Solutions, 73 Harvard Business Review89.Google Scholar
(2001), Shareholders and Corporate Governance: The Principle of One Share–One Vote, European Business Law Review67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Thou Shalt Not Sow Thy Vineyard with Divers Seeds? The Case Against the Harmonisation of Private Law, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 639.Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, Theo (2002), Takeover Regulation in Europe and America: The Needs for Functional Convergence, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 205.Google Scholar
Rahn, Gunther (1994), Recht und Rechtsmentalität in Japan, in: , and , Japanisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, New York: de Gruyter, p. 1.Google Scholar
, and (2003), The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century, 69 J. Finan. Econ. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), European Style of Corporate Governance at the Crossroads: The Role of Worker Involvement, 40 Journal of Common Market Studies111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), Die Hauptversammlung als oberstes Organ der Aktiengesellschaft, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
Regierungskommission Corporate Governance (2001), Unternehmensführung – Unternehmenskontrolle – Modernisierung des Aktienrechts.
(2002), Globalisierung. Die universelle Herausforderung, Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
(2006), Derivative Actions and the Funding Problem: The Way Forward, Journal of Business Law445.Google Scholar
(2002), Holzmüller-Kompetenz der Hauptversammlung beim Erwerb einer Unternehmensbeteiligung?, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht1091.Google Scholar
(1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Prometheus Books (cited version: London: Dent, 1973).Google Scholar
(2001), Hauptversammlung und Internet, 165 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht204.Google Scholar
Roberts, John, and Van den Steen, Eric (2000), Shareholder Interests, Human Capital Investment and Corporate Governance, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=230019.
(1995), America's Fascination with German Corporate Governance, Aktiengesellschaft291.Google Scholar
Rock, Edward, Kanda, Hideki, and Kraakman, Reinier (2004), Significant Corporate Actions, in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 131.Google Scholar
Rodatz, Peter (1995), Einige Bemerkungen zu den Besonderheiten im japanischen Gesellschaftsrecht, in: (ed.), Das Japanische im japanischen Recht, Munich: Iudicum, p. 247.Google Scholar
(2002), Rezension: Olaf Kliesow, Aktionärsrechte und Aktionärsklage in Japan, 13 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht299.Google Scholar
(1998), Stimmbindungsvereinbarungen in den Aktien- und GmbH-Rechten Deutschlands, Englands, Frankreichts und Belgiens: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung, Cologne: Heymanns.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani (1999), Modernization and the Confucian World, in: The Colorado College (ed.), Cultures in the 21st Century: Conflicts and Convergences, Colorado College Studies Number 32, p. 83.
(1991), A Political Theory of American Corporate Finance, 91 Columbia Law Review10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (1996a), Some Differences in Corporate Structure in Germany, Japan, and the United States, in: (ed.), Comparative Law – Law and the Legal Process in Japan, Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, p. 320 (also published in: (1993) 102 Yale L. J. 1927).Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (1996b), German ‘Populism’ and the Large Public Corporation, in: , , , and (eds.), European Economic and Business Law, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (1997), Path Dependence, Political Options, and Governance Systems, in: , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance – Essays and Materials, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 165.Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (2000), Political Preconditions to Separating Ownership from Corporate Control, 53 Stanford Law Review 539 (shorter version also published in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 113).Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (2002), Corporate Law's Limits, 31 Journal of Legal Studies 233 (also published as: What Corporate Law Cannot Do, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 107).Google Scholar
(2003a), Political Determinants of Corporate Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romano, Roberta (2002), Less Is More: Making Institutional Investor Activism a Valuable Mechanism of Corporate Governance, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 507 (also published in: (2001) 18 Yale Journal on Regulation 174).Google Scholar
(2005), The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance, 114 Yale L. J.1521.Google Scholar
(2001), European Union Company Law Convergence Possibilities after Centros, 11 Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs. 121.Google Scholar
Rossi, Guido (2003), Do Good Governance Recommendations Change the Rules for the Board of Directors? in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 493.Google Scholar
(2000), Die ökonomischen Grundlagen eines Rechts der Publikumsgesellschaft, Zürich: Schulthess.Google Scholar
(2001), The End of Globalization: Why Global Strategy Is a Myth and How to Profit from the Realities of Regional Markets, New York: Amacon.Google Scholar
Ryn, Jean van (1990), Capital and Securities of Marketable Share Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 5 II.Google Scholar
(2005), Should Global Rules Have Legal Teeth? Policing (WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control) vs. Good Citizenship (UN Global Compact), 10 Int. J. Bus. 363.Google Scholar
(2004), Zur anstehenden Novellierung des japanischen Gesellschaftsrechts, 18 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht210.Google Scholar
(2003), Corporations American Style or with a European Touch? Corporate Governance, Culture and Convergence, European Business Law Review471.Google Scholar
(1962), The New Commercial Code of Japan: Symbol of Gradual Progress Toward Democratic Goals, 50 Geo. L. J.478.Google Scholar
Schaede, Ulrike (1997), The ‘Old Boy’ Network and Government–Business Relationships in Japan, in: (ed.), Japan: Economic Success and Legal System, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Abwehrmöglichkeiten des Vorstands von börsennotierten Aktiengesellschaften bei feindlichen Übernahmeversuchen – ein Rechtsvergleich zwischen Deutschland und den USA, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht150.Google Scholar
, and (2000), Lehrbuch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts, 3rd edition, Berlin: Springer (English version: Economic Analysis of Civil Law, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Der deutsche Anteil an der Gestaltung des modernen japanischen Rechts- und Verfassungswesens: Deutsche Rechtsberater im Japan der Meiji-Zeit, Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
(2002), Neue Perspektiven für Banken in China nach dem World Trade Organization-Beitritt, Die Bank295.Google Scholar
, and (2004), Verabschiedete Gesetze: Bericht über die Gesetzgebungstätigkeit des japanischen Parlaments von der 156. bis zur 159. Sitzungsperiode, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht195.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Bedarf es einer neuen gesetzlichen Regelung des Anfechtungsrechts zur Bekämpfung räuberischer Aktionäre?, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht577.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Corporate Governance in China: Then and Now, Columbia Business Law Review1.Google Scholar
(2003), Die neuen Marktsegmente der Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse, Aktiengesellschaft57.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Dominique (1998), Gestaltungsfreiheit im französischen Gesellschaftsrecht, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Reinhard H., and Spindler, Gerald (2004), Path Dependence and Complementary in Corporate Governance, in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Die Umstellung von Inhaber- auf Namensaktien durch deutsche Aktiengesellschaften, Berlin: Tenea.Google Scholar
Schnyder, Anton K. (2000), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht – zu Begriff und Phänomenologie, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 515.Google Scholar
(2000), Die Bedeutung der Lehre vom Rechtskreis und der Rechtskultur, 99 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft373.Google Scholar
Schruff, Wienand (1996), Accounting Standards in Practice, in: , , , and (eds.), European Economic and Business Law, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte-Kulkmann, Nicole (2003), Rechtszusammenarbeit im Kontext der europäisch-chinesischen Beziehungen, Working Paper China Analysis No. 24, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
(2003), Internationale Rechnungslegung für den Einzelabschluss und für Unternehmen, die den öffentlichen Kapitalmarkt nicht in Anspruch nehmen, ZIP93.Google Scholar
(1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit Interest and Business Cycle, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
(1987), Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie, 6th edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
(1999), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Principles of Corporate Governance – Grundsätze der Unternehmensführung und -kontrolle für die Welt, Aktiengesellschaft337.Google Scholar
(2004), Der Deutsche Corporate Governance-Kodex – eine private oder doch eine staatliche Regelung?, ZIP285.Google Scholar
(1998), Zivilisierung wider Willen. Der Konflikt der Kulturen mit sich selbst, Frankfurt (Main): Suhrkamp (English version: The Clash within Civilisations: Coming to Terms with Cultural Conflicts, London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Sharma, Rajesh (1999), Company Law, in: , and (eds.), Chinese Law, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 369.Google Scholar
Shishido, Zenichi (1997), Legal Monitoring Systems in Japan: Legal Possibilities and Current Practice, in: (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law, Volume 2, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 149.Google Scholar
(2000), Japanese Corporate Governance: The Hidden Problems of Corporate Law and Their Solutions, 25 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law189.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Corporate Governance in China – Obstacles and New Development, 29 International Business Lawyer455.Google Scholar
(1997), Vorzugsaktien als ‘Hybride’ Finanzierungsform und ihre Grenzen, 161 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht628.Google Scholar
(1995), Back to the Future: Appraisal Rights in the Twenty-First Century, 32 Harv. J. on Legis. 79.Google Scholar
(2000), Der Regierungsentwurf für ein Gesetz zur Namensaktie und zur Erleichterung der Stimmrechtsausübung (NaStraG), Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht626.Google Scholar
(2002a), Der Neoliberalismus als Modell für die Gesetzgebung?, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik170.Google Scholar
(2002c), Convergence, Competition, Centros and Conflicts of Law: European Company Law in the 21st Century, 27 E.L. Rev.47.Google Scholar
(2002d), Shareholders, Stakeholders and the ‘Ordoliberalism’, 13 European Business Law Review139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), Der anonyme Aktionär – The anonymous shareholder – L'actionnaire anonyme, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht218.Google Scholar
(2004a), Die Harmonisierung des Internationalen Deliktsrechts und die Einheit der Rechtsordnung, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft662.Google Scholar
(2004c), The European Directive on Cross-Border Mergers: An International Model?, 11 Colum. J. Eur. L. 167.Google Scholar
(2005a), The Impact of the European Company (Societas Europaea (European Company)) on Legal Culture, 30 E.L. Rev. 431.Google Scholar
(2005b), What Does Not Work in Comparing Securities Laws: A Critique on La Porta et al.'s Methodology, International Company and Commercial Law Review300.Google Scholar
(2005c), Anspruchsziele bei betrügerischen Täuschungen des Kapitalmarktes, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung184.Google Scholar
(2005d), Welche Auswirkung hat das neue Verfolgungsrecht der Aktionärsminderheit? – Eine rechtsvergleichende Folgenanalyse des § 148 AktG-E, 104 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft376.Google Scholar
(2005e), Numerical Comparative Law – Do We Need Statistical Evidence in Order to Reduce Complexity?, 13 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law521.Google Scholar
(2005f), The Case Against Harmonisation of Shareholder Rights, 6 European Business Organization Law Review539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Legal Adaptability in Elbonia, 2 International Journal of Law in Context 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007a), Legal Origins: Reconciling Law and Finance and Comparative Law, 52 McGill Law Journal 55.Google Scholar
(2007b), SEVIC: Beyond Cross-Border Mergers, European Business Organization Law Review 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005), Judicial Federalism in the European Court of Justice's Berlusconi Case: Towards More Credible Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting?, 46 Harv. Int'l L.J.487.Google Scholar
(2001), Why Must We Meet? Thinking about Why Shareholders Meetings Are Required, 19 C&SLJ506.Google Scholar
(1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (cited version: Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), A Comparative Analysis of the Proxy Machinery in Germany, Japan and the United States: Implications for the Political Theory of American Corporate Finance, 58 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 145.Google Scholar
(1999), Governing Economic Globalisation: Global Legal Pluralism and European Law, 5 European Law Journal331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), Französisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
, and (2000), Einführung in das französische Recht, 3rd edition, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger (2006), On the Insignificance and/or Endogeneity of La Porta et al.'s ‘Anti-Director Rights Index’ under Consistent Coding, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=894301.
(2000), Internet und Corporate Governance – ein neuer virtueller (T)Raum?, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht420.Google Scholar
Spindler, Gerald (2006), Stimmrecht und Teilnahme an der Hauptversammlung, in: (ed.), Gesellschaftsrecht in der Diskussion 2005, Cologne: Dr Otto Schmidt, p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapledon, Geoff P., and Bates, Jonathan J. (2002), Reducing the Costs of Proxy Voting, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 567.Google Scholar
(1999), The Futility of Unification and Harmonization in International Commercial Law, 39 Va. J. Int'l L. 743.Google Scholar
(1999), Globalisierung der Wirtschaft und Rechtsprinzipien des Weltwirtschaftssystems, Festschrift Groϐfeld1173.Google Scholar
(2002), Reform des französischen Unternehmensrecht im Rahmen des Gesetzes über ‘Neue Wirtschaftliche Regulierungen’ vom 15.05.2001, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft409.Google Scholar
Stout, Lynn A. (2003), On the Export of US-Style Corporate Fiduciary Duties to Other Cultures: Can a Transplant Take?, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), General Meetings: A Dispensable Tool for Corporate Governance of Listed Companies?, 11 Corporate Governance74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Systemwettbewerb als Herausforderung an Politik und Theorie, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Strine, Leo E. (2006), Towards a True Corporate Republic: A Traditionalist Response to Lucian's Solution for Improving Corporate America, 119 Harr. L. Rev. 1759.CrossRef
Takahashi, Eiji (1997), Changes in the Japanese Enterprise Groups?, in: (ed.), Japan: Economic Success and Legal System, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), Corporate Governance und die Reform des Gesellschaftsrechts in Deutschland und Europa, 16 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht121.Google Scholar
, and (2003), Liberalisierung des Erwerbs eigener Aktien in Japan, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft757.Google Scholar
, and (1998), Bestandsaufnahme: Die japanische Aktienrechtsreform des Jahres 1997, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft615.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Eiji and Rudo, Joachim (2000), Missbrauch von Aktionärsrechten in Japan und Deutschland, in , and (eds.), Recht in Japan, Volume 12, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 71.Google Scholar
, and (2004), Japanese Corporate Law: Important Cases in 2002 and 2003, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht241.Google Scholar
and (2005), Japanese Corporate Law: Important Cases in 2003 and 2004, 20 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht241.Google Scholar
and (2006), Japanese Corporate Law: Two Important Cases Concerning Takeovers in 2005, 21 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht231.Google Scholar
, and (2005), The Future of Japanese Corporate Governance: The 2005 Reform, 19 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht35.Google Scholar
(1988), Japan's Company Law and the Promotion of Corporate Democracy: A Futile Attempt?, 27 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 195.Google Scholar
(2004), Fundamental Issues of Corporate Governance in Japan, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht5.Google Scholar
(2001), Corporate Governance in Europa, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht645.Google Scholar
(1999), Accounting in a Global Market and in an Electronic Age, Festschrift Groϐfeld1243.Google Scholar
(1995), Einführung, in: Steinemann, Matthias, Thümmel, Martin, and Zhang, Xuan, Kapitalgesellschaften in China, Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde, p. 5.Google Scholar
(1956), A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, 64 Journal of Political Economy416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasic, Roman, and Fu, Jian (1999), Company Law in China, in: (ed.), Company Law in East Asia, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 135.Google Scholar
(1993), International Regulatory Competition, Externalization, and Jurisdiction, 34 Harv. Int'l L.J.48.Google Scholar
(2002), Cross-Border Mergers: Problems and Solutions, 30 International Business Lawyer69.Google Scholar
Tunc, André (1991), Corporate Law, in: (ed.), European Business Law: Legal and Economic Analyses on Integration and Harmonization, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Junko (2000), Japan's Current Move Towards Statutory Reform: Is It a Breakthrough to a New Era?, in: (ed.), International Corporate Law, Volume 1, Oxford: Hart, p. 179.Google Scholar
(2005) A Comparative View of the Two Corporate Statutory Reforms: The UK and Japan, International Company and Commercial Law Review421.Google Scholar
(1999a), Die Aktionärsklage als Instrument zur Kontrolle des Vorstands- und Aufsichtsratshandelns, 163 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht290.Google Scholar
(1999b), Schutzinstrumente gegen die Gefahren aus der Geschäftstätigkeit inländischer Zweigniederlassungen von Kapitalgesellschaften mit fiktivem Auslandssitz, Juristenzeitung662.Google Scholar
(2001), The Business Judgment Rule and Shareholder Derivative Suits in Japan: A Comparison with Those in the United States, 14 N.Y. Int'l L. Rev. 129.Google Scholar
Vagts, Detlev F. (1972), Law and Accounting in Business Associations, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 12A.Google Scholar
Vagts, Detlev F. (1998), Gestaltungsfreiheit im amerikanischen Aktienrecht, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, Detlev F. (2000), Securities Regulation – An Introduction, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 10.Google Scholar
(2000), Towards an Institutional Legal Framework for Regulatory Competition in Europe, 53 Kyklos435.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Governance in a Globalising World: Convergence or Divergence? A European Perspective, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Van der Elst, Christoph (2003), The Equity Markets, Ownership Structures and Control: Towards an International Harmonisation?, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 3.Google Scholar
, and (1998), Legal Cultures and Legal Paradigms: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law, 47 International and Comparative Law Quarterly495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2001), Die Auslegung von Gesetzen in England und auf dem Kontinent, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
(2002), The Globalization of Corporate Governance: Shareholder Protection, Hostile Takeovers and the Evolving Corporate Environment in France, 18 Conn. J. Int'l L. 1.Google Scholar
Wang, Jiang-yu (2000), China's Securities Experiment: The Challenge of Globalisation, available at www.geocities.com/pennwang/research/ressec/ressecindex.htm.
Wedderburn of Charlton, Lord (1985), The Legal Development of Corporate Responsibility: For Whom Will Corporate Managers Be Trustees? in: , and , Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Corporatization and Privatization: A Chinese Perspective, 22 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 219.Google Scholar
(2003), Comparative Corporate Governance: A Chinese Perspective, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Weller, Michael, and Zahn, Andreas (2000), Die Namensaktie in anderen Europäischen Ländern, in: Rosen, Rüdiger von, and Seifert, Werner G. (eds.), Die Namensaktie, Eschborn: DAI, p. 177.
, , and (2005), Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: An Empirical Analysis of the Compliance Statement by German Listed Companies, 13 Corporate Governance178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), European Community; Treaty establishing the European Community Company Law, Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets.Google Scholar
(2003a), The Societas Europaea (European Company) Company – A New Common European Company from 8 October 2003, European Business Law Review85.Google Scholar
(1999), Information, Institutions, and Extortion in Japan and the United States: Making Sense of Sokaiya Racketeers, 93 Nw. U. L. Rev. 767.Google Scholar
(2001a), The Puzzling Divergence of Corporate Law: Evidence and Explanations from Japan and the United States, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 528.Google Scholar
(2001b), Why Shareholders Sue: The Evidence from Japan, 30 J. Legal Stud. 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Sally (2002), Corporations and the Third Way. Oxford: Hart.
(2001), The Role of the Shareholder in Corporate Governance: A Theoretical Approach, 25 Melbourne U. L. Rev. 418.Google Scholar
(2002), Vorstandsmacht statt Bankenmacht?, 166 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht182.Google Scholar
(1989), Organverantwortung und Gesellschafterklagen in der Aktiengesellschaft, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, Wolfgang (2000), Die Amerikanisierung des Rechts, insbesondere des Bank- und Wirtschaftsrechts, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 601.Google Scholar
(1961), Interessen und Organisation der Aktiengesellschaft im amerikanischen und deutschen Recht, Karlsruhe: Müller.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Economic Globalization, 35 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 705.Google Scholar
, and (2005), An Emerging Third Way? The Erosion of the Anglo-American Shareholder Value Construct, 38 Cornell Int'l L.J.493Google Scholar
Windbichler, Christine (2000), Alternative Dispute Resolution v. Shareholders' Suits?, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 617.Google Scholar
Winter, Jaap (2003), Cross-Border Voting in Europe, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 387.Google Scholar
Winter, Ralph K. (1980), State Law, Shareholder Protection, and Theory of the Corporation, in: , and , Economics of Corporation Law and Securities Regulation, Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, p. 91.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Anfechtungsklagen gegen Squeeze-out-Hauptversammlungsbeschlüsse wegen angeblicher Verfassungswidrigkeit, Aktiengesellschaft503.Google Scholar
(2001), Die Hauptversammlung im Wandel der Kommunikationsformen, Frankfurt (Main): Lang.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Governance. Der Import angelsächsicher ‘Self-Regulation’ im Widerstreit zum deutschen Parlamentsvorbehalt, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik59.Google Scholar
Wollschläger, Christian (1997), Historical Trends in Civil Litigation in Japan, Arizona, Sweden, and Germany: Japanese Legal Culture in the Light of Judicial Statistics, in: (ed.), Japan: Economic Success and Legal System, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002), Foreign Law Firms Set to Expand in China, China Law & Practice, March 2002, 54.Google Scholar
(2000), Corporate Governance: Remedying and Ratifying Directors' Breaches, 116 Law Quarterly Review638.Google Scholar
(2001b), Shares and Shareholders: Property, Power and Entitlement, 22 Comp. Law. 258 and 307.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Michael, and Labermeier, Alexander (2000), Rechtliche Behandlung, Übertragung und Börsenhandel von Namensaktien in den USA, in: , and (eds.), Die Namensaktie, Eschborn: DAI, p. 143.Google Scholar
Wymeersch, Eddy (2000), Centros: A Landmark Decision in European Company Law, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 629.Google Scholar
(2001a), Company Law in Europe and European Company Law, in: 1st European Jurists Forum, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 85.Google Scholar
(2001b), Gesellschaftsrecht im Wandel: Ursachen und Entwicklungslinien, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht294.Google Scholar
Wymeersch, Eddy (2001c), Current Company Law Reform Initiatives in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Countries: Challenges and Opportunities, available at www.law.rug.ac.be/fli/WP/WPindex.html.
Wymeersch, Eddy (2002), Convergence or Divergence in Corporate Governance Patterns in Western Europe?, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 230.Google Scholar
(2003), The Transfer of the Company's Seat in European Company Law, 40 Common Market Law Review661.Google Scholar
Wymeersch, Eddy (2005), Implementation of Corporate Governance Codes, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 403.Google Scholar
(2006), Enforcement of Corporate Governance Codes, 6 Journal of Corporate Law Studies113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Centros: Is This Really the End for the Theory of the Siege Reel, 22 Comp. Law. 2.Google Scholar
(2006), Institutional Shareholder Activism in China: Law and Practice, 17 International Company and Commercial Law Review251 and 287.Google Scholar
(2001), New Regulations for E-Commerce in Japan, 12Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht145.Google Scholar
(2003), Neue Entwicklungen im Japanischen Bilanzrecht: Die Reform des Jahres 2003, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht111.Google Scholar
(2001), Shareholding and Board Structures of German und UK Companies, 22 Comp. Law. 47.Google Scholar
(2001), China's Entry into the World Trade Organization: Impact on China's Regulating Regime of Foreign Direct Investment, 35 Int. L. 195.Google Scholar
(1999), Modernization and the Confucian World, in: The Colorado College (ed.), Cultures in the 21st Century: Conflicts and Convergences, Colorado College Studies Number 32, p. 37.Google Scholar
Zetzsche, Dirk (2004), Explicit and Implicit System of Corporate Control – A Convergence Theory of Shareholder Rights, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=600722.
, and (2001), Foreign Investment Companies Limited by shares: The Latest Chinese Organization for Major International Ventures, 21 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 409.Google Scholar
(2002), Der Beitritt der Volksrepublik China zur World Trade Organization: rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und Auswirkungen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht208.Google Scholar
(1963), Die Schranken mitgliedschaftlicher Stimmrechtsmacht bei den privatrechtlichen Personenverbänden, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(2000), Zur Problematik der aktienrechtlichen Anfechtungsklage, Aktiengesellschaft145.Google Scholar
Zuleeg, Manfred (2000), Federalization Through Law – An Evergreen, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 669.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer (2006a), Spaces and Places: A Systems Theory Approach to Regulatory Competition in European Company Law, 12 European Law Journal 534.
Zumbansen, Peer (2006b), The Parallel Worlds of Corporate Governance and Labor Law, 13 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 261.
(1949–50), Rechtsvergleichung als universale Interpretationsmethode, 15 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht5.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Rolf (1999), Pfadabhängigkeit, Institutionen und Regelreform, PhD Thesis, Freiburg.
(1994), Die Usurpation von Aktionärsbefugnissen mittels Ringverflechtung in der ‘Deutschland Aktiengesellschaft’, Aktiengesellschaft148.Google Scholar
Ahlering, Beth, and Deakin, Simon (2006), Labour Regulation, Corporate Governance and Legal Origin: A Case of Institutional Complementarity?, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=898184/ (and forthcoming in Law and Society Review).
(2000), Lobbyismus heute – Neue Herausforderungen durch Globalisierung, Europäisierung und Berlinisierung, Wirtschaftsdienst139.Google Scholar
Allen, William (1998), The Corporate Director's Fiduciary Duty of Care and the Business Judgment Rule Under US Corporate Law, in: , , , , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of Art and Emerging Research, Oxford: Clarendon, p. 307.Google Scholar
, and (1999), Free Movement of Companies from a Nordic Perspective, 6 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Kent's World: A Personal Approach to the Various Worlds of Japanese Law, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht36.Google Scholar
(1998), Cultural Hegemony: The Exportation of Anglo-Saxon Corporate Governance Ideologies to Germany, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 69.Google Scholar
ANSA (Association National de Sociétés par Actions) (2003), Proxy Voting Reform in France: A Guide to Non-Resident Shareholders, 2nd edition, available at www.ansa.asso.fr/site/acv_index_uk.asp.
(2001b), The New Regulatory and Supervisory Architecture of Japan's Financial Market, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht101.Google Scholar
(2003), Neuregelungen von Aufsicht, Rechtsdurchsetzung und Finanzdienstleistungen in Japan, 16 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht13.Google Scholar
Arlt, Marie-Agnes (2005), Frankreich, in: (ed.), Vorstandshaftung in 15 europäischen Ländern, Vienna: Linde, p. 467.Google Scholar
(2005), Who Should Make Corporate Law? European Community; Treaty establishing the European Community Legislation versus Regulatory Competition, 58 Current Legal Problems369.Google Scholar
, , and (2003), Shareholder Primacy and the Trajectory of UK Corporate Governance, 41 British Journal of Industrial Relations531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007), Who Writes the Rules for Hostile Takeovers, and Why? The Peculiar Divergences of US and UK Takeover Regulation, 95 Geo. L.J. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
(2003a), Reconsidering the Importance of Law in Japanese Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Daiwa Bank Shareholder Derivative Case, 36 Cornell Int'l L.J.11.Google Scholar
(2003b), Learning from Comparative Law in Teaching US Corporate Law: Director's Liability in Japan and the US, 22 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 213.Google Scholar
Assmann, Heinz-Dieter (1990), Einführung und Verformung westlichen Rechts im Finanz- und Kapitalmarktrecht Japans, in: , , , , , , and (eds.), Die Japanisierung des westlichen Rechts, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 275.Google Scholar
(2003), Corporate Governance im Schnittfeld von Gesellschaftsrecht und Kapitalmarktrecht, Festschrift Kümpel1.Google Scholar
(2001), Verwaltungsvollmacht und ‘Aktionärsdemokratie’: Selbstregulative Ansätze für die Hauptversammlung, Aktiengesellschaft635.Google Scholar
, and (1999), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002), Appraisal Rights in Japanese Corporate Law, 13 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht129.Google Scholar
(2006), Liberalized Rules for the Restructuring of Japanese Companies: Mergers, Demergers, and Share Exchanges under the New Company Law, 21 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht19.Google Scholar
(1997), What Causes New Securities Regulation?: 300 Years of Evidence, 75 Wash. U.L.Q. 849.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (2001), The Control of Corporate Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000), Social Dumping and the Race to the Bottom: Some Lessons for the European Union from Delaware, 25 E.L. Rev. 57.Google Scholar
, and (1972), Frankreich, Jura Europae, Droit des societés, Gesellschaftsrecht, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(1996), Der Markt für Unternehmen und die Regelung von öffenltichen Übernahmenangeboten in Japan, Aktiengesellschaft399.Google Scholar
Baum, Harald (1997), Börsen- und Kapitalmarktrecht in Japan, in: , , and (eds.), Börsenreform – Eine ökonomische, rechtsvergleichende und rechtspolitische Untersuchung, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, p. 1265.Google Scholar
(1998), Zur Diskussion über vergleichende Corporate Governance mit Japan, 62 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht739.Google Scholar
Baum, Harald (2000), Globalization, Capital Markets and Possible Regulatory Responses, in: , and (eds.), Legal Aspects of Globalization, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 77.Google Scholar
Baum, Harald and Hayakawa, Masaru (1994), Die rechtliche Gestaltung des japanischen Finanzmarktes, in: , and , Japanisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, New York: de Gruyter, p. 495.Google Scholar
Baums, Theodor (1998), Shareholder Representation and Proxy Voting in the European Union: A Comparative Study, in: , , , , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of Art and Emerging Research, Oxford: Clarendon, p. 545.Google Scholar
Baums, Theodor (1999), Globalisierung und deutsches Gesellschaftsrecht: Der Fall Daimler-Chrysler, in: (ed.), Profile der Wissenschaft. 25 Jahre Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück: Rasch, p. 235.Google Scholar
(2000), Empfiehlt sich eine Neuregelung des aktienrechtlichen Anfechtungs- und Organhaftungsrechts, insbesondere der Klagemöglichkeit von Aktionären?, Gutachten des 63. Deutschen Juristentages, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Baums, Theodor, and Möller, Matthias (2000), Venture Capital: US-amerikanisches Modell und deutsches Aktienrecht, in: ; , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 33.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (1999), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
(1994), Efficient and Inefficient Sales of Corporate Control, 109 Q.J. Econ. 957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), The Case Against Board Veto in Corporate Takeovers, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev. 973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye (2006), Letting Shareholders Set the Rules, 119 Harvard Law Review 1784.
, , and (2002), Does the Evidence Favor State Competition in Corporate Law?, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1775.Google Scholar
Bebchuk Lucian Arye, and Ferrell, Allen (2001), The Race to Protect Managers from Takeovers, in: , and (eds.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 68 (also published in: (1999) 99 Colum. L. Rev. 1168).Google Scholar
, and (2004), Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Vigorous Race or Leisurely Walk: Reconsidering the Competition over Corporate Charters, 112 Yale L.J.553.Google Scholar
Bebchuk Lucian Arye, and Roe, Mark J. (1999), A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance, 52 Stan. L. Rev. 127 (also published in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 69).Google Scholar
Becht Marco, Mayer, Colin, and Wagner, Hannes F. (2006), Where Do Firms Incorporate?, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=906066.
(2001), Die institutionelle Stimmrechtsvertretung der Aktionäre in Europa, Frankfurt (Main): Lang.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael (1997b), Börsen- und Kapitalmarktrecht der Vereinigten Staaten, in: , , and (eds.), Börsenreform – Eine ökonomische, rechtsvergleichende und rechtspolitische Untersuchung, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, p. 755.Google Scholar
(2005), Japan Needs Real Merger Reform and Disclosure, December 2005International Financial Law Review25.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Anwendungs- und Haftungsfragen zum Deutschen Corporate Governance-Kodex, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen1569.Google Scholar
(2001), Auf dem Weg zu einem europäischen Gemeinrecht der Methode, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht4.Google Scholar
, , and (2003a), Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect, 47 Europ. Econ. Rev. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note, 45 Harv. L. Rev. 1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, revised edition, New York: Legal Classics Library, 1993.Google Scholar
(2002), Global Differences in Corporate Governance-Systems, Wiesbaden: Deutscher-Universitäts-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969), Einige Bemerkungen zur Theorie des Einflusses der Verbände auf die politische Willensbildung in der Demokratie, 22 Kyklos276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Die Entwicklung der Corporate Governance in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
(1990b), Is Corporate Law Trivial?: A Political and Economic Analysis, 84 Northwestern University Law Review542.Google Scholar
Black, Bernard S. (1997), Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance in the United States, in: (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, New York: Grove's Dictionaries, p. 459.Google Scholar
, and (1996), A Self Enforcing Model of Corporate Law, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002), Delaware's Takeover Law: The Uncertain Search for Hidden Value, 96 Nw. U. L. Rev. 521.Google Scholar
(2000) and (2001), Proceduralizing Self-Regulation (Part I and Part II), 20 O. J. L. S. 597 and 21 O. J. L. S.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Reforming Corporate Governance: What History Can Teach Us, Berkeley Bus. L.J.1.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Reform’ or ‘Opening’? Reform of China's State-Owned Enterprises and World Trade Organization Accession – The Dilemma of Applying GATT to Marketizing Economies, 16 UCLA Pac. Basin L.J.198.Google Scholar
(1996), Der Organstreit in der Kapitalgesellschaft: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zum deutschen, französischen und englischen Recht, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Bottomley, Stephan (1999), Company Law in Japan, in: (ed.), Company Law in East Asia, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 39.Google Scholar
(2006), Shareholder Protection in the USA and Germany – ‘Law and Finance’ Revisited, 7 German Law Journal257.Google Scholar
, and (2002), The Institutional Investor's Goals for Corporate Law in the Twenty-First Century, 25 Del. J. Corp. L. 35.Google Scholar
(2000), Teaching Comparative Corporate Governance: The Significance of ‘Soft Law’ and International Institutions, 34 Ga. L. Rev. 669.Google Scholar
(2001), The Very Uncertain Prospect of ‘Global’ Convergence in Corporate Governance, 34 Cornell Int'l L.J.321.Google Scholar
Branson, Douglas M. (2002), The Social Responsibility of Large Multinational Corporations, 16 Transnational Law 121.
Bratton, William W., and McCahery, Joseph A. (1999), Comparative Corporate Governance and the Theory of the Firm: The Case Against Global Cross Reference, 38 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 213 (also published in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 23).Google Scholar
, and (1988), Legal Harmonization and the Business Enterprise, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1992), Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance.Google Scholar
Campbell, David (1999), What Is Meant by ‘the Rule of Law’ in Asian Company Law Reform?, in: (ed.), Company Law in East Asia, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 11.Google Scholar
(1969), Systemdenken und Systembegriff in der Jurisprudenz, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
(2004), Regulation without Borders: The Impact of Sarbanes–Oxley on European Companies, 27 Ford. Int'l L. J.785.Google Scholar
(1997), The Political Economy of Competition for Corporate Charters, 26 J. Legal Stud. 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974), Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware, 83 Yale L.J.663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Foreign Law Firms: Implications for Professional Legal Education in Japan, 20 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht55.Google Scholar
(1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2002), An Examination of American and German Corporate Law Norms, 16 St John's J. Legal Comment. 431.Google Scholar
(1991), Competition Among Jurisdictions in Formulating Corporate Law Rules: An American Perspective on the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in the European Communities, 32 Harv. Int'l L.J.423.Google Scholar
Charny, David (2004), The Politics of Corporate Convergence, in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001a), Does Law Matter? The Separation of Ownership and Control in the United Kingdom, 30 J. Legal Stud. 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b), The Metamorphosis of ‘Germany Inc.’: The Case of Executive Pay', 49 Am. J. Comp. L. 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001c), History and the Global Corporate Governance Revolution: The UK Perspective, 43/4 Bus. Hist. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R. (2002), Putting Britain on the Roe Map: The Emergence of the Berle–Means Corporation in the United Kingdom, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 147.Google Scholar
(2003a), Law as Bedrock: The Foundations of an Economy Dominated by Widely Held Public Companies, 23 O. J. L. S.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R. (2003b), Will Executive Pay Globalise Along American Lines, 11 Corporate Governance 8 (similar version published as: Cheffins, Brian R., and Thomas, Randall S., Regulation and the Globalization (Americanization) of Executive Pay, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 155).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003c), Mergers and Corporate Ownership Structure: The United States and Germany at the Turn of the 20th Century, 51 Am. J. Comp. L. 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R. (2006), Dividends as a Substitute for Corporate Law: The Separation of Ownership and Control in the United Kingdom, 63 Washington and Lee Law Review 1273.
(1999), Towards a Legal Enlightenment: Discussions in Contemporary China on the Rule of Law, 17 UCLA Pac. Basin L.J.125.Google Scholar
(2002), European Pensions and Global Finance: Continuity or Convergence?, 7 New Political Economy67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006a), The Independent Director in Chinese Corporate Governance, 36 Del. J. Corp. L. 125.Google Scholar
Clarke, Donald (2006b), Lost in Translation? Corporate Legal Transplants in China, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=913784.
Clarke, Donald, Murrell, Peter, and Whiting, Susan (2006), The Role of Law in China's Economic Development, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=878672.
Clarke, Michael G. (1991), The Conflicts of Law Dimension, in: (ed.), Corporate Law: The European Dimension, London: Butterworths, p. 161.Google Scholar
, and (2000), Corporate-Governance-Grundsätze in Deutschland – Nützliche Orientierungshilfe oder regulatorisches Übermaϐ?, Aktiengesellschaft481.Google Scholar
(1991), Liquidity versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, John C. (1996), Organhaftung im amerikanischen Recht, in: , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance, Cologne: Otto Schmidt, p. 165.Google Scholar
(1999a), Privatization and Corporate Governance: The Lessons from Securities Market Failure, 25 J. Corp. L. 1.Google Scholar
(1999b), The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications, 93 Nw. U. L. Rev. 641.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2001), The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control, 111 Yale L.J. 1 (also published in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 663).Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2002a), Convergence and Its Critics: What Are the Preconditions to the Separation of Ownership and Control?, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 83.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2002b), Racing Towards the Top?: The Impact of Cross-Listings and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance, 102 Colum. L. Rev. 1757 (shorter version also published in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 437).Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2003), What Caused Enron?, in: , and , Corporate Governance and Capital Flows in a Global Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 29.Google Scholar
(2000), Die Organisationsverfassung der Aktiengesellschaft in China, Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde.Google Scholar
Company Law Reform (2005), Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry by Command of Her Majesty, Cm 6456, available at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/WhitePaper.pdf.
Conard, Alfred (1969), Fundamental Changes in Marketable Share Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 6.Google Scholar
Conrad, Harald (2003), Sustaining Old Age Security in Japan: Towards a New Public–Private Mix, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht 199.
Cook, Jennifer and Deakin, Simon (1999), Stakeholding and Corporate Governance: Theory and Evidence on Economic Performance, Resesarch Paper, available at www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/publications/index.htm.
(2005), The Real Difference in Corporate Law Between the United States and Continental Europe: Distribution of Powers, 30 Del. J. Corp. L. 697.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Peter, and Kogut, Bruce Mitchel (2003), Introduction, in: , and (eds.), Corporate Governance and Capital Flows in a Global Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 1.Google Scholar
Crabb, Kelly (1987), The Reality of Extralegal Barriers to Mergers and Acquisitions in Japan, 21 Int. L. 97 (also published in: (ed.), Japanese Law in Context: Readings in Society, the Economy, and Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001, p. 490).Google Scholar
Crook, Kimberley (2004), Accounting for Share-Based Remuneration, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 347.Google Scholar
(1999), Commonalities and Prescriptions in the Vertical Dimension of Global Corporate Governance, 84 Cornell L. Rev. 1133.Google Scholar
Dam, Kenneth W. (2006), China As a Test Case: Is the Rule of Law Essential for Economic Growth, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=880125.
(1991), Should Provinces Compete? The Case for a Competitive Corporate Law Market, 36 McGill Law Journal138.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L. (1997a), Institutional Investors as Corporate Monitors in the UK, in: , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance – Essays and Materials, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 47.Google Scholar
(1997b), Gower's Principles of Modern Company Law, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 6th edition.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L. (1999), United Kingdom, in: , and (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 331.Google Scholar
(2001), Struktur der Unternehmensführung in Groϐbritannien und Deutschland – Konvergenz oder fortbestehende Divergenz?, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht268 (English version in (2002) 2 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal435).Google Scholar
(2003), Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law 7th edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L. (2004), Post-Enron Developments in the United Kingdom, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 185.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L., and Hopt, Klaus J. (2004), Control Transactions, in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 157.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen M. (1999), Bridging the Accountability Gap: An Agenda for Global Share Voting Reform, in: , and (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 383.Google Scholar
, , and (eds.), The European Private Company?, Antwerp: Maklu, p. 21.
Deakin, Simon (2001), Regulatory Competition versus Harmonization in European Company Law, in: , and (eds.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 190.Google Scholar
Deminor (2005), Application of the One Share–One Vote Principle in Europe, available at www.abi.org.uk/BookShop/ResearchReports/DEMINOR_REPORT.pdf.
(2005), Building an Investor-Friendly Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit System in China, 46 Harv. Int'l L.J.347.Google Scholar
(2005), Die japanische Gesellschaftsrechtsreform 2005/2006, 20 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht123.Google Scholar
(2001), Stellungnahme zum Fragenkatalog der Regierungskommission ‘Corporate Governance – Unternehmensführung, Unternehmenskontrolle, Modernisierung des Aktienrechts’ v. 20.09.2000, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht185.Google Scholar
Dine, Janet (1995), Private Property and Corporate Governance, Part II, Content of Directors' Duties and Remedies, in: (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law, Volume 1, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 115.Google Scholar
(2005), Companies, International Trade and Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Drafting Company Law in Transition Economies, 1 Journal of Comparative Law338.Google Scholar
Dodd, Peter, and Leftwich, Richard (1980), The Market for Corporate Charters: Unhealthy Competition vs. Federal Regulation, in: , and , Economics of Corporation Law and Securities Regulation, Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, p. 100.Google Scholar
(2005), Shareholder Voice and Its Opponents, 5 Journal of Corporate Law Studies305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001), Some Comparisons Between the Model Business Corporation Act and the Delaware General Corporation Law, 56 Bus. Law. 737.Google Scholar
(2000), Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism, Japan and German versus the Anglo-Saxon, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1998), The Myth of the Global Corporation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1968), Ökonomische Theorie der Demokratie, Tübingen: Mohr (original version: An Economic Theory of Democracy, 1957).Google Scholar
(1999), Wettbewerb oder Vereinheitlichung der Rechtsordnungen in Europa?, Juristenzeitung105.Google Scholar
(1986), Rechtsvergleichung in der deutschen Rechtssprechung, 50 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht610.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (1998), The Use of Comparative Law by Courts, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Druey, Jean Nicholas (1999), General Report, in: , and (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 367.Google Scholar
(1998), The Regulation and Recognition of Foreign Corporations: Responses to the Delaware Syndrome, 57 Cambridge Law Journal165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Die Vorschläge der SLIM-Arbeitsgruppe zur Vereinfachung des Europäischen Gesellschaftsrechts, Aktiengesellschaft291.Google Scholar
(1999), Eine rechtsvergleichende Studie über Minderheitenrechte der Aktionäre sowie Stimmrechtsausübung und -vertretung in Europa, Deutsche Schutzvereinigung für Wertpapierbesitz eV.Google Scholar
(1992), L'histoire des grandes sociétés en Allemagne, en France et en Italie, Rev.int.dr.comp. 849.Google Scholar
Dunlavy, Colleen A. (1998), Corporate Governance in the Late 19th Century Europe and the US – The Case of Shareholder Voting Rights, in: , , , , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of Art and Emerging Research, Oxford: Clarendon, p. 5.Google Scholar
, and (2004), Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison, 49 Journal of Finance537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. (1996), Federalism and European Business Law, in: , , , and (eds.), European Economic and Business Law, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1991), The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1999a), Das Schicksal der Sitztheorie nach dem Centros-Urteil des EuGH, Juristenzeitung656.Google Scholar
(1999b), Unternehmensrechtsangleichung in der Europäischen Union: Brauchen wir ein European Law Institute?, Festschrift Groϐfeld189.Google Scholar
Ebke, Werner F. (2000), Accounting, Auditing and Global Capital Market, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 113.Google Scholar
(1999), European Community; Treaty establishing the European Community Company Law, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
(2004), The Directive on Takeover Bids – Not Worth the Paper It's Written On?, 1 European Company and Financial Law Review416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Rechtsanwendung, Gesetzgebung und ökonomische Analyse, 197 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis80.Google Scholar
(2001), Die neuen Vorschriften des Aktientauschs und der Aktienübertragung: Einführung und Gesetzesübersetzung, 11 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht223.Google Scholar
(2004a), Holdinggesellschaften in Japan: Entwicklung, Verbot, Wiederzulassung und aktueller Rechtsrahmen, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
(2004b), Konzerneigenschaft horizontaler japanischer Unternehmensgruppen?, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht115.Google Scholar
(1999), The Conception that the Corporation Is a Nexus of Contracts, and the Dual Nature of the Firm, 24 J. Corp. L. 819.Google Scholar
Ellett, Fiona (2000), Australia and the UK on the Quest for the Best Corporate Practice, in: (ed.), International Corporate Law, Volume 1, Oxford: Hart, p. 173.Google Scholar
, and , (1999), US-amerikanisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
(2000), The Law on Corporate Directors' Self-Dealing: A Comparative Analysis, 2 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal297.Google Scholar
Enriques, Luca (2002), Do Corporate Law Judges Matter? Some Evidence from Milan, 3 European Business Organization Law Review 765 (shorter version also published as: Off the Books, But on the Record: Evidence from Italy on the Relevance of Judges to Quality of Corporate Law, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 257).Google Scholar
(2004a), Silence Is Golden: The European Company as a Catalyst for Company Law Arbitrage, 4 Journal of Corporate Law Studies77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b), European Community; Treaty establishing the European Community Company Law and the Fears of a European Delaware, European Business Law Review1259.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Die Durchsetzung von Corporate-Governance-Regeln, Aktiengesellschaft336.Google Scholar
(2001), Reform durch Deregulierung im Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (2001), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Euroshareholders Corporate Governance Guidelines (2000), available at www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/european_shareholders.pdf.
, and (eds.) (2006), Party Funding and Campaign Financing in International Perspective, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Expert Group on Cross-Border Voting (2002), Consultative Document on Cross-Border Voting in Europe and Final Report.
Fabritius, Andreas (2004), Aktuelle Fragen des Übernahmerechts, Erfahrungen aus der Praxis, in: (ed.), Gesellschaftsrecht in der Diskussion 2003, Cologne: Otto Schmidt, p. 45.Google Scholar
(1970), Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, 25 Journal of Finance383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980), Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, 88 Journal of Political Economy288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), The Role of Corporate Law in French Corporate Governance, 31 Cornell Int'l L.J.31.Google Scholar
Faugérolas, Laurent (2003), Impact of the Takeovers and Their Regulation on French Company Law and Practice in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 327.Google Scholar
(2001), Corporate Law, Codes and Social Norms – Finding the Right Regulatory Combination and Institutional Structure, 1 Journal of Corporate Law Studies381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferran, Eílis (2003a), Legal Capital Rules and Modern Securities Markets – The Case for Reform, as Illustrated by the UK Equity Markets, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 115.Google Scholar
Ferran, Eílis (2003b), The Role of the Shareholder in Internal Corporate Governance: Enabling Shareholders to Make Better-Informed Decisions, 4 European Business Organization Law Review 491 (also published in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 417).Google Scholar
(2004), Building an European Union Securities Market, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarini, Guido (2003), Shareholder Value and the Modernisation of European Corporate Law, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 223.Google Scholar
Ferrarini Guido, and Moloney, Niamh (2004), Executive Remuneration and Corporate Governance in the European Union: Convergence, Divergence, and Reform Perspectives in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 267.Google Scholar
(2001), Grundfragen der ökonomischen Theorie im Gesellschafts- und Kapitalmarktrecht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht1.Google Scholar
(2002), Das neue Recht des Squeeze out, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht757.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Holger (2004), The Responsibility of the Management and Its Enforcement, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 373.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Verantwortlichkeit für falsche Kapitalmarktinformationen in Frankreich – das droit des marchés financiers, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft729.Google Scholar
(2002), Die Bedeutung der Unternehmensgröϐe in Japan am Beispiel der Mindestkapital- und Publizitätsregelungen, 14 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht91.Google Scholar
(2000), Rechts- und Parteifähigkeit ausländischer Gesellschaften mit Verwaltungssitz in Deutschland? – Die Sitztheorie vor dem EuGH, Der Betrieb1109.Google Scholar
(2000), Company Law Theory in Comparative Perspective: England and France, 48 Am. J. Comp. L. 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Nicholas H. D. (2006), Perception, Language and Reality in Corporate Law Theory, 17 King's College Law Journal 299.
(1996), Der Einfluss institutioneller Anleger in der Hauptversammlung, Cologne: Heymanns.Google Scholar
(1999), Der Wettbewerb der Rechtsordnungen im Internationalen Gesellschaftsrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht267.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. (1980), Ökonomische Theorie der Politik, in: et al. (eds.), Handwörterbuch der Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Stuttgart: Fischer, Volume 5, p. 658.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence (1990), Some Thoughts on Comparative Legal Culture, in: (ed.), Comparative Law and Private International Law: Essays in Honour of John Henry Merryman, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, p. 49.Google Scholar
(2001), Developing Venture Capital Laws in China: Lessons Learned from the United States, Germany and Japan, 23 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L.J.487.Google Scholar
(2005), Red Tape Casts Shadow on Cross-Border M&A, in International Financial Law Review Guide to China.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Glen S. (1988), The Liberalization of Legal Services in Japan: A US Government Negotiator's Perspective, 21 Law in Japan 5 (also published in: (ed.), Japanese Law in Context: Readings in Society, the Economy, and Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001, p. 61).Google Scholar
(1999), Der chinesische Kapitalmarkt auf dem Weg zu neuen Regelungen, Newsletter der Deutsch-Chinesischen Juristenvereinigung, 1999/2.Google Scholar
(2004), Wettbewerbsbedingungen im europäischen Gesellschaftsrecht, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung170.Google Scholar
(2005), The Structure of Regulatory Competition in European Corporate Law, 5 Journal of Corporate Law Studies247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerke, Wolfgang, Bank, Matthias, and Steiger, Max (2003), The Changing Role of Institutional Investors – A German Perspective in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 357.Google Scholar
Gessner, Volkmar (1998), Globalization and Legal Certainty, in: , and (eds.), Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 427.Google Scholar
Gessner, Volkmar and Budak, Ali Cem (1998), Introduction, in and (eds.), Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 3.Google Scholar
(1954), Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht, Volume I, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgemeinschaft (first published in 1868).Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J. (2001), Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function, 49 Am. J. Comp. L. 329 (also published in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 128).Google Scholar
Ginsburg Thomas B. (2005), The Regulation of Regulation: Judicialization, Convergence, and Divergence in Administrative Law, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 321.Google Scholar
(2002), Das Proporzwahlverfahren (cumulative voting) als Instrument der Corporate Governance, Festschrift Druey401.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Modernising Company Law’: The Government's White Paper, 66 Modern Law Review402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goergen, Marc, and Renneboog, Luc (2001), Strong Managers and Passive Institutional Investors in the UK, in: , and (eds.), The Control of Corporate Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 259.Google Scholar
, and (2000), Corporate Governance: Current Trends and Likely Developments for the Twenty-First Century, 25 Del. J. Corp. L. 683.Google Scholar
(1993), Common law und civil law: Eine überholte Unterscheidung, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht493.Google Scholar
Gordley, James (2001), Legal Reasoning: Some Parallels in Common Law and Civil Law, in: , , and (eds.), Unterschiedliche Rechtskulturen – Konvergenz des Rechtsdenkens/Different Legal Cultures – Convergence of Legal Reasoning, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 63.Google Scholar
(1991), Shareholder Initiative: A Social Choice and Game Theoretic Approach to Corporate Law, 60 U. Cin. L. Rev. 347.Google Scholar
(1994), Relational Investors: A New Look at Cumulative Voting, 94 Columbia Law Review124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Pathways to Corporate Convergence? Two Steps on the Road to Shareholder Capitalism in Germany: Deutsche Telekom and Daimler Chrysler, 5 Colum. J. Eur. L. 219.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jeffrey N. (2003), Convergence on Shareholder Capitalism: An Internationalist Perspective, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Jeffrey N. (2004), The International Relations Wedge in the Corporate Convergence Debate, in , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goshen Zohar (2003), Controlling Corporate Self-Dealing: Convergence or Path-Dependency, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, Simon (1995), The Private Company in the United Kingdom, in: , and (eds.), The European Private Company?, Antwerp: Maklu, p. 55.Google Scholar
Grant, Wyn (2000), Globalisation, Big Business and the Blair Government, CSGR Working Paper No. 58/00, available at www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/abstracts/abwp5800/.
(1998), The Doctrinal Basis of the Rights of Company Shareholders, 57 Cambridge Law Journal554.Google Scholar
Groϐfeld, Bernhard (1971), Management and Control of Marketable Share Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 4.Google Scholar
(1995), Internationales und Europäisches Unternehmensrecht. Das Organisationsrecht transnationaler Unternehmen, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
(2002), Cross-Border Mergers: Corporate Accounting/Corporate Valuation, 101 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft1.Google Scholar
Groϐfeld, Bernhard, and Deilmann, Barbara (1990), Historische und gegenwärtige Entwicklungen im deutschen Aktienrecht, in: , , , , , , and (eds.), Die Japanisierung des westlichen Rechts, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 255.Google Scholar
Groϐkommentar zum AktG (1992–) (eds. Hopt, Klaus J., and Wiedemann, Herbert), 4th edition, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Group of German Experts on Corporate Law (2002), Stellungnahme zum Konsultationsdokument der High Level Group on Corporate Law, available at www.jura.uni-duesseldorf.de/dozenten/noack/texte/sonstige/hlg.pdf.
Grundmann, Stefan (2001), Wettbewerb der Regelgeber im Europäischen Gesellschaftsrecht – jedes Marktsegment hat seine Struktur, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 783 (English version: Regulatory Competition in European Company Law – Some Different Genius?, in: , , and (eds.), Capital Markets in the Age of the Euro, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002, p. 561).Google Scholar
, and (2003), Die Goldene Aktie und der Markt für Unternehmenskontrolle im Rechtsvergleich – insbesondere Staatskontrolle, Höchst- und Mehrfachstimmrechte sowie Übernahmemaϐnahmen, 102 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft289.Google Scholar
(2001), Global Shares of German Corporations and Their Dual Listings on the Frankfurt and New York Stock Exchanges, 22 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 185.Google Scholar
(2006), Foreign Buyers Get First Bite at G-share Market, February 2006 International Financial Law Review 41.Google Scholar
(2001), The Rules of Good Corporate Governance and the Methods of Efficient Implementation: A Nigerian Perspective, 22 Comp. Law. 119.Google Scholar
(1995), Wandelschuldverschreibungen und Optionsanleihen im französischen Recht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht208.Google Scholar
Guyon, Yves (1998), Zur Gestaltungsfreiheit im französischen Gesellschaftsrecht, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyon, Yves (1999), France, in: , and (eds.), Shareholder Voting Rights and Practices in Europe and the United States, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 95.Google Scholar
(2001), Aktienrecht und Internet, 165 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht172.Google Scholar
Haley, John O. (1988), Redefining the Scope of Practice under Japan's New Regime for Regulating Foreign Lawyers, 21 Law in Japan 18 (also published in: (ed.), Japanese Law in Context: Readings in Society, the Economy, and Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001, p. 58).Google Scholar
(2001), International Banking Regulation into the 21st Century: Flirting with Revolution, 21 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 41.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Corporate Democracy and Stockholder-Adopted By-Laws: Taking Back the Street?, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 409.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Robert W. (1992), Corporations, 3rd edition, St Paul, MN: West.
(2001), Proxy-Voting, Remote-Voting und Online-HV – § 134 III 3 AktG nach dem NaStraG, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht355.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier (2001), The End of History for Corporate Law, 88 Geo. L.J. 439 (also published in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 33, also published as: Towards a Single Model of Corporate Law? in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 56).Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier (2004), What Is Corporate Law?; Agency Problems and Legal Strategies; The Basic Governance Structure, all in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1, 21 and 33.Google Scholar
(2003), The Public Interest Theory of Regulation: Non-Existence or Misinterpretation?, 15 Europ. J. Law & Econ. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Abwehr feindlicher Übernahmen in den USA, 100 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft275.Google Scholar
(2000), Die französischen Société par Actions Simplifiée – eine zukunftsweisende Gesellschaftsform, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen1530.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Motomi (2002), Commercial Code Revisions: Promoting the Evolution of Japanese Companies, Nomura Research Institute Paper No. 48, available at www.nri.co.jp/english/opinion/papers/index.html.
(1992), Die Bedeutung von Delaware für das US-amerikanische Gesellschaftsrecht, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft539.Google Scholar
(2004), Common Trajectories, Variable Paces, Divergent Outcomes? Models of European Capitalism under Conditions of Complex Economic Interdependence, 11 Review of International Political Economy231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), Die Aktionärsklage im japanischen Gesellschaftsrecht, Festschrift Mestmäcker891.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, Masara (1997), Shareholders in Japan: Attitudes, Conduct, Legal Rights, and Their Enforcement, in: (ed.), Japan: Economic Success and Legal System, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Die Reform des Gesellschaftsrecht vom Mai 2002 und Corporate Governance in Japan, 14 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht31.Google Scholar
(2003), Die Neuregelung von Verschmelzung, Spaltung und Gründung von Holding-Gesellschaften, 16 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht59.Google Scholar
, and (1992), Japanische Gesellschaftsrechtsreform: Teilnovelle 1991 zum Aktien- und GmbH-Recht, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft282.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von (1978), Competition as a Discovery Procedure, in: (ed.), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, Chicago: Chicago University Press, p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian (2001a), Der chinesische Aktienmarkt (I). Staatliche Regulierung und institutioneller Wandel, Working Paper China Analysis No. 3, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Heilmann, Sebastian (2001b), Der chinesische Aktienmarkt (II). Schlüsselakteure und inoffizielle Spielregeln, Working Paper China Analysis No. 4, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
, and (2002), European Corporate Laws, Regulatory Competition and Path Dependence, 13 Europ. J. Law & Econ. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), Can Securities Law Approaches Be Harmonised with Essential Principles of Company Law?, European Business Law Review60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Angleichung des Gesellschaftsrechts in Europa – Notwendigkeit, Schwerpunkte und Wege aus der Sicht des Kapitalmarkts, Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht580.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Hans-Jürgen (2005), The Transatlantic Financial Markets Regulatory Dialogue, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 363.Google Scholar
Henle, Walter (1999), Neue gesetzliche Grundlagen für das Shareholder-Value-Denken in Deutschland, in: (ed.), The International Lawyer, Freundesgabe für Wulf H. Döser, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 161.Google Scholar
Hertig, Gérard (2000), Western Europe's Corporate Governance Dilemma, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 265.Google Scholar
Hertig, Gérard (2004), Convergence of Substantive Law and Convergence of Enforcement: A Comparison, in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertig, Gérard, and Kanda, Hideki (2004), Creditor Protection; Related Party Transactions, both in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71 and 101.Google Scholar
Hertig, Gérard, Kraakman, Reinier, and Rock, Edward (2004), Issuers and Investor Protection, in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 193.Google Scholar
Higgott, Richard, and Reich, Simon (1998), Globalisation and Sites of Conflict: Towards Definition and Taxonomy, CSGR Working Paper, available at www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/abstracts/1/.
High Level Group of Company Law Experts (2002), A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe, available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/docs/modern/report_en.pdf.
Hill, Jennifer (2000a), Public Beginnings, Private Ends – Should Corporate Law Privilege the Interest of Shareholders, in: (ed.), International Corporate Law, Volume 1, Oxford: Hart, p. 17.Google Scholar
(1974), Abwanderung und Widerspruch, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (English version: Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Hirte, Heribert (1998), Die aktienrechtliche Satzungsstrenge: Kapitalmarkt und sonstige Legitimation versus Gestaltungsfreiheit, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirte, Heribert (2000), Der Einfluss neuer Informationstechniken auf das Gesellschaftsrecht und die corporate-governance-Debatte, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 283.Google Scholar
Hirte, Heribert (2003), Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht, 4th edition, Cologne: RWS Kommunikationsforum.
(2000), Minderheitenschutz und Recht der Aktionäre in Europa, Festschrift Bezzenberger147.Google Scholar
, , , and (1995), Englisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
(1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills: Sage (2nd edition: Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, 2003).Google Scholar
Hommelhoff, Peter (1985), Eigenkontrolle statt Staatskontrolle, in: , and (eds.), Hundert Jahre modernes Aktienrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a), Anlegerinformationen im Aktien-, Bilanz- und Kapitalmarktrecht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht748.Google Scholar
(2000b), Das Unternehmensrecht vor den Herausforderungen der Globalisierung, Festschrift Lutter95.Google Scholar
(1976), Vom Aktien- und Börsenrecht zum Kapitalmarktrecht? – Teil 1, 140 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht201.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (1980), Ideelle und wirtschaftliche Grundlagen der Aktien-, Bank- und Börsenrechtsentwicklung im 19. Jahrhundert, in: , and (eds.), Wissenschaft und Kodifiation des Privatrechts im 19. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt (Main): Klostermann, p. 128.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (1985), Self-Dealing and Use of Corporate Opportunity and Information: Regulating Directors' Conflicts of Interest, in: , and , Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (1992), Directors' Duties to Shareholders, Employees, and Other Creditors: A View from the Continent, in: , Commercial Aspects of Trust and Fiduciary Obligations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 115.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (1998a), Gestaltungsfreiheit im Gesellschaftsrecht in Europa. Generalbericht, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (2000), Common Principles of Corporate Governance in Europe?, in: (ed.), Millennium Lectures, Oxford: Hart, p. 105 (also published in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 175; and in German in (2000) Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 779).Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (2002b), Unternehmensführung, Unternehmenskontrolle, Modernisierung des Aktienrechts – Zum Bericht der Regierungskommission Corporate Governance, in: , , , , and (eds.), Aktienrecht für globale Kapitalmärkte, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft, p. 27.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J. (2004), Trusteeship and Conflicts of Interest in Corporate, Banking and Agency Law: Towards Common Legal Principles for Intermediaries in the Modern Service-Oriented Society, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 51.Google Scholar
Hopt, Klaus J., and Wymeersch, Eddy (2003), Preface, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (eds.) (2005), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horioka, Charles Yuji (2001), Japan's Public Pension System in the Twenty First Century, in: , , and , Japan's New Economy: Continuity and Change in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 99.Google Scholar
Horn, Norbert (1979), Aktienrechtliche Unternehmensorganisation in der Hochindustrialisierung, in: , and , Recht und Entwicklung der Groϐunternehmen im neunzehnten und frühen zwanzigsten Jahrhundert, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, p. 123.Google Scholar
(2005), Regulation of Companies with Publicly Listed Share Capital in the People's Republic of China, 38 Cornell Int'l L.J.237.Google Scholar
(2005), China's Takeover Law: A Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Reform, 30 Del. J. Corp. L. 145.Google Scholar
Hulle, Karel van (1994), Gesellschaftsrecht, in: (ed.), EG-Handbuch Recht im Binnenmarkt, 2nd edition, Herne: Neue Wirtschafts-Briefe, p. 395.Google Scholar
(1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.Google Scholar
(1999), Keynote Address, in: The Colorado College (ed.), Cultures in the 21st Century: Conflicts and Convergences, 32 Colorado College Studies1.Google Scholar
(2004), Classification of Legal Families Today: Is It Time for a Memorial Hymn, Rev.int.dr.comp. 11.Google Scholar
(2001), Namensaktien, Internet und die Zukunft der Stimmrechtsvertretung, Aktiengesellschaft68.Google Scholar
(2001), Where Are We Going?: The Process of Change in Japanese Corporate Governance, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht69.Google Scholar
Immenga, Ulrich (1985), Company Systems and Affiliation, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 7.Google Scholar
, and (1987), Aktionär und Aktiengesellschaft in Japan, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft13.Google Scholar
(1999), Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership, 62 Modern Law Review32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Über die Stellung der ausländischen Rechtsanwälte in Japan, 19 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht19.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Tracking Stock: A European Perspective, 8 Journal of International Banking and Financial Law372.Google Scholar
(2000), Corporate Governance in Comparative Perspective: Prospects of Convergence, 22 Comp. L. L. & Pol'y J. 5.Google Scholar
(2002), The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2001), Verarbschiedete Gesetzes: Berichte über die 151. und 152. Sitzungsperiode des Japanischen Parlaments, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht249.Google Scholar
, , , and (2002), New Rules for Share Structure and Governance of Japanese Corporations, 13 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht253.Google Scholar
(2003), Die kulturelle Dimension des Rechts – ihre Bedeutung für das Internationale Privatrecht und die Rechtsvergleichung, 67 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeover, 76 Am. Econ. Rev.323.Google Scholar
, and (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3 J. Finan. Econ. 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Christian (2003), On the Legitimacy of European Private Law, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 7.3, available at www.ejcl.org/73/art73-3.html.
(2002), German Corporate Culture in the Twenty-First Century: The Interrelation between the End of Germany Inc. and Germany's Corporate Capital Gains Tax Reform, 11 Minnesota Journal of Global Trade69.Google Scholar
(1998), A Regulatory Competition Theory of Indeterminacy in Corporate Law, 98 Columbia Law Review 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, Hideki (1997), Trends in Japanese Corporate Governance, in: , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance – Essays and Materials, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 185.Google Scholar
Kanda, Hideki (2000), Globalization of Capital Markets: A Perspective from Japan, in: , and (eds.), Legal Aspects of Globalization, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 69.Google Scholar
(2004), Understanding Recent Trends Regarding the Liability of Managers and Directors in Japanese Corporate Law, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht29.Google Scholar
Kawamoto, Ichiro (1994), Handels- und Gesellschaftsrecht, in: , and , Japanisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, New York: de Gruyter, p. 47.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2001), Japan, Corporations and Partnerships, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Keidanren (2001), A Proposal for Better Corporate Accounting, available at www.keidanren.or.jp/english/policy/2001/013.html.
(1987), The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Choice of Law – A Comparison of the United States and European Systems and a Proposal for a European Directive, 28 Brooklyn Journal of International Law1.Google Scholar
(1998), Leitungskompetenz und Leitungsverantwortung im deutschen, US-amerikanischen und japanischen Aktienrecht, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft602.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard (1993), in: (ed.), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
(2002), Wettbewerb der Privatrechtsordnungen im Europäischen Binnenmarkt, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
(2001), Taking International Soft Law Seriously: Its Implications for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance, Journal of Korean Law1.Google Scholar
(2001), Legal System and Legal Culture in Japan, 11 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht7.Google Scholar
(2001), Demokratie ohne parlamentarische Gesetzgebung?, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift1332.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Christian (2003), Shareholder Value: A New Standard for Company Conduct in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 341.Google Scholar
(1997), Global Gadflies: Applications and Implications of US-Style Corporate Governance Abroad, 17 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L.621Google Scholar
(1998), Die Europäisierung des Privatrechts: Der EuGH als Zivilrichter, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Kleindiek, Detlef (2003), Die Zukunft der Rechnungslegung in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen, in: (ed.), Gesellschaftsrecht in der Diskussion 2002, Cologne: Otto Schmidt, p. 3.Google Scholar
(2002), Die Bedeutung des Zivil- und Wirtschaftsrechts – Rechtssystem für Direktinvestionen in der VR China, 101 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft220.Google Scholar
(2001a), Rechtsvergleichende Anmerkungen zum japanischen Verschmelzungs- und Spaltungsrecht, 11 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht65.Google Scholar
(2001b), Änderungen des Handelsgesetzes mit Wirkung zum 1. Oktober 2001, 12 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht139.Google Scholar
(1999), International Codes of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility, 8 Transnational Corporation143.Google Scholar
Kölner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (1986–) (ed. Zöllner, Wolfgang), 2nd edition, Köln: Heymanns.
Komiyama, Makoto, and Masaoka, Yukinobu (2002), Corporate Governance: A New Phase for Japanese Companies, Nomura Research Institute Paper No. 47, available at www.nri.co.jp/english/opinion/papers/index.html.
(2002), Ringbeteiligungen von Aktiengesellschaften: Gesellschafts- und kartellrechtliche Aspekte, Cologne: Heymanns.Google Scholar
(1986), Rechtsvereinheitlichung – Nutzen, Kosten, Methoden, Ziele, 50 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht1.Google Scholar
(1992), Alternativen zur legislatorischen Rechtsvereinheitlichung, 56 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht215.Google Scholar
(1998), Abschied von der Rechtskreislehre?, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht493.Google Scholar
(2000), Der Bundesgerichtshof und die Rechtsvergleichung, Festgabe 50 Jahre Bundesgerichtshof, Volume II, p. 825.Google Scholar
(2001), The Reformation of Corporate Law in Japan and the Use of Information and Communication Technology, European Business Law Review318.Google Scholar
(2003), The Use of Stock Options as Defensive Measures: The Impact of the 2001 Amendments to the Corporate Law on Corporate Controls in Japan, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht135.Google Scholar
(2006), Recent Developments in Takeover Law: Changes in Business Practices Meet Decade-Old Rule, 21 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht5.Google Scholar
Kraakman, Reinier (2004), Disclosure and Corporate Governance: An Overview Essay, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 95.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ernst A. (2001), Konvergenz und Internationalisierung der juristischen Methode, in: , , and (eds.), Unterschiedliche Rechtskulturen – Konvergenz des Rechtsdenkens/Different Legal Cultures – Convergence of Legal Reasoning, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 31.Google Scholar
(2002), Das Unternehmensinteresse als Verhaltensmaxime der Leitungsorgane der Aktiengesellschaft im Rahmen der Organhaftung, Berlin: Tenea.Google Scholar
(1980), Intersystemare Kooperationen und Anpassungsprozesse zwischen westlichen und östlichen Wirtschaftssystemen, Frankfurt: R. G. Fischer.Google Scholar
(1998), Gesellschaftsrecht: die privatrechtlichen Ordnungsstrukturen und Regelungsprobleme von Verbänden und Unternehmen, 5th edition, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
(2003), NGOs, the Internet and International Economic Policy Making – The Failure of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Multilateral Agreement on Investment, 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law213.Google Scholar
, , and (1999), Corporate Ownership around the World, 54 Journal of Finance471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2000a), Agency Problems and Dividend Policies Around the World, 55 Journal of Finance1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2000b), Investor Protection and Corporate Governance, 58 J. Finan. Econ. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Nature v. Nurture: Evolution, Path Dependence and Corporate Governance, 18 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 279.Google Scholar
Ladeur, Karl-Heinz (2003), Globalisation and the Conversion of Democracy to Polycentric Networks, EUI Working Paper, available at http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/bitstream/1814/199/1/law03-4.pdf.
, and (1995), Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 3rd edition, Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization, Lanham: National Book Network.Google Scholar
Latham, Mark (1999a), Corporate Governance in Japan: A Future Scenario, available at www.corpmon.com/publications.htm.
Latham, Mark (1999b), The Road to Shareholder Power, available at www.corpmon.com/publications.htm.
Latham, Mark (2000), The Internet Will Drive Corporate Monitoring, available at www.corpmon.com/publications.htm.
Latham, Mark (2001), Democracy and Infomediaries, available at www.corpmon.com/publications.htm.
(1999), People's Republic of China: The New Shanghai Stock Exchange Listing Rules: An Egg Hatched or an Egg within an Egg, 20 Comp. Law. 243.Google Scholar
(1995), Private Property and Corporate Governance, Part I: Defining the Interests, in: Macmillan (Patfield), Fiona (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law: Volume 1, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 85.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Governance: What Can Be Learned from Japan?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001), Recent Amendments to the Commercial Code of Japan: Impact on Mergers & Acquisitions, 32 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 811.Google Scholar
(1996), European Legal Systems Are Not Converging, 45 International and Comparative Law Quarterly53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), The Impossibility of Legal Transplants, 4 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Paradoxically, Derrida: For a Comparative Legal Studies, 27 Cardozo Law Review631.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Jürgen (1990), Missbrauch des Auskunfts-, Frage- und Rederechts, in: (ed.), Missbräuchliches Aktionärsverhalten, Cologne: RWS-Forum, p. 51.Google Scholar
, and (2007), Shareholder Protection: A Leximetric Approach, 17Journal of Corporate Law Studies 17.Google Scholar
(2003), Corporate Governance the American way?, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 98Google Scholar
Leung, Erika, Liu, Lily, Shen, Lu, Taback, Kevin, and Wang, Leo (2002), Financial Reform and Corporate Governance in China, Working Paper, available at http://mitsloan.mit.edu/50th/pdf/corpgovchinapaper.pdf.
(1998), International Diversity in Securities Regulation: Roadblocks on the Way to Convergence, 20 Cardozo Law Review227.Google Scholar
(2001a), The Mother of All Path Dependencies: Towards a Cross-Cultural Theory of Corporate Governance-Systems, 26 Del. J. Corp. L. 147.Google Scholar
(2001b), David's Dilemma: A Case Study of Securities Regulation in a Small Open Market, 2/2 Theoretical Inquiries in Law5.Google Scholar
(2004a), Legal Plug-Ins: Cultural Distance, Cross-Listing, and Corporate Governance Reform, 22 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 195.Google Scholar
(2004b), The Maximands of Corporate Governance: A Theory of Values and Cognitive Style, 29 Del. J. Corp. L. 649.Google Scholar
Licht, Amir N., Goldschmidt, Chanan, and Schwartz, Shalom H. (2001), Culture, Law, and Finance: Cultural Dimensions of Corporate Governance Laws, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=277613.
, and (2005), Culture, Law, and Corporate Governance, 25 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Election Contest in the Company's Proxy: An Idea Whose Time Has Not Come, 59 Bus. Law. 67.Google Scholar
Liu, Lawrence S. (2001), Chinese Characteristics Compared: A Legal and Policy Perspective of Corporate Finance and Governance in Taiwan and China, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=273174.
Lombardo, Davide, and Pagano, Marco (2000), Legal Determinants of the Return on Equity, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=209310.
Lowenstein, Louis (1999), Corporate Governance and the Voice of the Paparazzi, Working Paper No. 132, Center for Law and Economic Studies, Columbia University School of Law, available http://ssrn.com/abstract=163386.
(2001), The End of History for Corporate Governance or Just Another Moment in Time, 19 C&SLJ305.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997), Ethik in internationalen Beziehungen, in: , and (eds.), Eine Welt – eine Moral?, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, p. 156.Google Scholar
Lutter, Marcus (1991), Anteilseigner und Unternehmen, in: , and (eds.), Rechtsgrundlagen freiheitlicher Unternehmenswirtschaft, Cologne: Otto Schmidt, p. 15.Google Scholar
Lutter, Marcus (1998a), Limited Liability Companies and Private Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 2.Google Scholar
(2000), The Purpose of Company Law and Company Lawyers in a Global Arena, 21 Comp. Law. 56.Google Scholar
MacNeil, Iain G. (2000), Competition and Convergence in Corporate Regulation: The Case of Overseas Listed Companies, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=278508.
, and (2001), International Corporate Regulation: Listing Rules and Overseas Companies, 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006), ‘Comply or Explain’: Market Discipline and Non-Compliance with the Combined Code, 14 Corporate Governance486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, Maria, and Andersson, Thomas (2002), Corporate Governance: Effects on Firm Performance and Economic Growth, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 386.Google Scholar
(2003), Corporate Governance-Systeme, Funktionen und Entwicklung am Beispiel von Deutschland und Groϐbritannien, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
(1965), Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control, 73 Journal of Political Economy110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marini, Philippe (1996), La modernisation du droit des sociétés. Rapport au premier ministre (‘Marini Report’).
(1994), The Gradual Convergence: Foreign Ideas, Foreign Influences, and English Law on the Eve of the 21st Century, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1971), Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1995), Historischer Überblick über das Aktienrecht Japans, 94 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft283.Google Scholar
(1959), Das neue japanische Aktienrecht, 24 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht115.Google Scholar
McCormack, Gerard (1998), Institutional Shareholders and the Promotion of Good Governance, in: (ed.), The Realm of Company Law, London: Kluwer Law, p. 131.Google Scholar
(2000) Company Law and the New Millennium: Some Cautionary Tales from the Past, 21 Comp. Law. 57.Google Scholar
(2002), Convergence in Corporate Governance – Possible, But Not Desirable, 47 Villanova Law Review341.Google Scholar
McGrew, Anthony G. (1998), Global Legal Internationalization and Present-Day Patterns of Globalization, in: , and (eds.), Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 325.Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company (2002), Global Investor Opinion Survey on Corporate Governance.
Meier-Schatz, Christian (1991), American Legal Harmonization from a European Perspective, in: (ed.), European Business Law: Legal and Economic Analyses on Integration and harmonization, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendiola, Alfredo, and O'Hara, Maureen (2003), Taking Stock in Stock Markets: The Changing Governance of Exchanges, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=431580.
(1991), US-amerikanisches Gesellschaftsrecht, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft (2nd edition, 2006, together with Stephan R. Göthel).Google Scholar
(1995), Das Europäische Gesellschaftsrecht und die Idee des ‘Wettbewerbs der Gesetzgeber’, 59 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht545.Google Scholar
Merkt, Hanno (2000), Die Geschichte der Namensaktie, in: , and (eds.), Die Namensaktie, Eschborn: DAI, p. 63.Google Scholar
Merkt, Hanno (2001a), Liberalisierung des europäischen Binnenmarktes durch Angleichung des Gesellschaftsrechts, in: , , , , and (eds.), Regulierung – Deregulierung – Liberalisierung, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 321.Google Scholar
(2004a), Die Pluralisierung des europäischen Gesellschaftsrechts, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft1.Google Scholar
Merkt, Hanno (2004b), Disclosing Disclosure: Europe's Winding Road to Competitive Standards of Publication of Company-Related Information, in: , , , and (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 115.Google Scholar
(2004c), European Company Law Reform: Struggling for a More Liberal Approach 1 European Company and Financial Law Review3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), The Loneliness of the Comparative Lawyer, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
(1991), Vergleichender Überblick über das Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften in Frankreich, Deutsches Steuerrecht1563.Google Scholar
(2000), Unresponsive Shareholders in Public Companies, Dial ‘M’ for Motivate, 21 Comp. Law. 142.Google Scholar
(2003), Company Stakeholders: Their Position under the New Framework, 24 Company Lawyer56.Google Scholar
(1996), A Relational Theory of Japanese Corporate Governance: Contract, Culture, and the Rule of Law, 37 Harv. Int'l L.J.3.Google Scholar
Milhaupt, Curtis J. (1998), Property Rights in Firms, 84 Virginia Law Review 1145 (also published in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 210).Google Scholar
(2001), Creative Norm Destruction: The Evolution of Nonlegal Rules in Japanese Corporate Governance, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), On the (Fleeting) Existence of the Main Bank System and Other Japanese Economic Institutions, 27 Law and Social Inquiry425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), In the Shadow of Delaware? The Rise of Hostile Takeovers in Japan, 105 Columbia Law Review2171.Google Scholar
Milhaupt, Curtis J., and West, Mark D. (2003a), Institutional Change and M&A in Japan: Diversity Through Deals, Center for Law and Economic Studies, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003b), Is the Japanese Bureaucracy Hollowing Out? Evidence from the Market for Legal Talent, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht5.Google Scholar
(1998), Political Structure and Corporate Governance: Some Points of Contrast Between the United States and England, Columbia Business Law Review51.Google Scholar
(2001), Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions in Europe: Reforming Barriers to Takeovers, Columbia Business Law Review683.Google Scholar
, and (2002a), The Fable of the Keiretsu, 11 Journal of Economics and Management Strategy169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002b), The Myth of the Main Bank: Japan and Comparative Corporate Governance, 27 Law and Social Inquiry401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005a), Does Relationship Banking Matter? The Myth of the Japanese Main Bank, 2 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miwa, Yoshiro and Ramseyer, Mark (2005b), The Multiple Roles of Banks? Convenient Tales from Modern Japan, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 527.Google Scholar
Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy (1999), Developing the Framework, Presented by the Company Law Steering Group (UK), available at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/modcolaw.htm.
Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Final Report (2001), Presented by the Company Law Steering Group (UK), available at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/final_report/index.htm.
Modernising Company Law (2002), Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry by Command of Her Majesty, Cm 5553, available at www.dti.gov.uk/companiesbill/whitepaper.htm.
(2003), Rumble in the Boardroom? The Change of Japanese Corporate Governance Schemes, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht142.Google Scholar
(2000), French Corporate Governance in the New Millennium: Who Watches the Board in Corporate France?, 6 Colum. J. Eur. L. 73.Google Scholar
(1997), Anlegerschutz durch Aktien- und Kapitalmarktrecht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht334.Google Scholar
(1996a), Aktiengesellschaft, Unternehmensgruppe und Kapitalmarkt, 2nd edition, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(1996b), Empfehlen sich gesetzliche Regelungen zur Einschränkung des Einflusses der Kreditinstitute auf Aktiengesellschaften? Gutachten E für den 61. Deutschen Juristentag, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(1997), Shareholder Value aus rechtlicher Sicht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht129.Google Scholar
(2003), Die Abschwächungen des mitgliedschaftlichen Bestandsschutzes im Aktienrecht, Festschrift Ulmer433.Google Scholar
(2000), Systemwettbewerb, Harmonisierung und Wettbewerbsverzerrung, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
(1929), Umgestaltung der Aktiengesellschaft zur Kerngesellschaft verantwortungsvoller Groϐaktionäre, Berlin: Heymann.Google Scholar
Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (2000–), 2nd edition, Munich: Beck.
Myners, Paul (2001), Institutional Investment in the UK: A Review, available at www.hm-treasury.gov.uk./Documents/Financial_Services/Securities_and_Investments/fin_sec_mynfinal.cfm.
Myners, Paul (2005) Pre-emption Rights: Final Report, available at www.dti.gov.uk/files/file28436.pdf.
, and (eds.) (2002), Globalisierung des Rechts II: Internationale Organisationen und Regelungsbereiche, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Narusawa, Takashi, Emori, Masafumi, and Ohmori, Satoshi (2001), Rebirth of Japanese Companies Through Governance Reforms, Nomura Research Institute Paper No. 25, available at www.nri.co.jp/english/opinion/papers/index.html.
(2003), Private Acquisitions by Foreign Investors in China: Is the Party Finally Over?, China Law & Practice, April 2003, 13.Google Scholar
Neyer, Jürgen (1998), Binding Territoriality and Functionality? Globalization Meets the Law, in: , and (eds.), Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 401.Google Scholar
(1999), Entwicklungen im Aktienrecht 1999/2000, Frankfurt (Main): Deutsches Aktieninstitut.Google Scholar
(2000b), Die organisierte Stimmrechtsvertretung auf Hauptversammlungen – insbesondere durch die Gesellschaft, Festschrift Lutter1463.Google Scholar
Noack, Ulrich (2002a), Zukunft der Hauptversammlung – Hauptversammlung der Zukunft, in: , Die virtuelle Hauptversammlung, Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, p. 13.Google Scholar
(2002c), Neuerungen im Recht der Hauptversammlung durch das Transparenz- und Publizitätsgesetz und den Deutschen Corporate Governance-Kodex, Der Betrieb620.Google Scholar
(2002d), Grenzüberschreitende Stimmrechtsausübung – Ein Abenteuer im Binnenmarkt, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen68.Google Scholar
(2003), Hauptversammlung der Aktiengesellschaft und moderne Kommunikationstechnik – aktuelle Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht241.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Die Legitimation der Aktionäre bei Globalaktien und Depotverbuchung, Aktiengesellschaft651.Google Scholar
, and (2001), A By-product of the Globalization Process: The Rise of Cross Border Bank Mergers and Acquisitions – The US Framework, 56 Bus. Law. 591.Google Scholar
(2001), Japanese Corporate Governance at a Crossroads: Variation in Varieties of Capitalism?, 27 N.C. J. Int'l & Com. Reg. 255.Google Scholar
Nunnenkamp, Peter (2006), Liberalisation and Regulation of International Capital Flows: Where the Opposites Meet, in , and (eds.), The Regulation of International Financial Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996), Corporation and Other Business Associations, 2nd edition, Boston: Little, Brown and Company (3rd edition, 1999).Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Law Reform in Japan 2001/2002: Deregulation of Company Law?, 14 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht5.Google Scholar
(2005), Comprehensive Overhaul of the Securities and Exchange Law: The Draft on the Trading of Financial Products of 2006, 21 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht225.Google Scholar
(1999), Competition between National Legal Systems: A Contribution to Economic Analysis to Comparative Law, 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, Anthony (2000), Self-Regulation, in: , and (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume V, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 587.Google Scholar
Ogus, Anthony (2002), Comparing Regulatory Systems, Working Paper, available at www.competition-regulation.org.uk/publications/working_papers/wp35.pdf, now also published in: , and (eds.), International Handbook on Privatization, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, Ch. 23.Google Scholar
(1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(2000), Centros Revisited: Assessing the Impact on Corporate Organisation in Europe, International Company and Commercial Law Review407.Google Scholar
Ommeslaghe, Pierre Van (1990), Capital and Securities of Marketable Share Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 5 I.Google Scholar
, and (1999), A Comparative Study of the Fundamental Elements of Chinese and English Company Law, 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Breaking on Through to the Other Side: Understanding Continental European Corporate Governance, 22 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 975.Google Scholar
(2002), Americanization of Stock Corporation Laws Around the World and Shareholders' Derivative Suits as a Forgotten Element Therein, 13 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht29.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, Mary (2001), Change and Continuity in the French System of Corporate Governance, Working Paper, available at www.insead.fr/projects/cgep/Research/NationalSystems/NSCGFR0101without.pdf.
Pagano, Marco (2002), The Performance of European Stock Exchanges: Evidence from Listing Decisions, in: , , and (eds.), Capital Markets in the Age of the Euro, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 297.Google Scholar
, and (2005), The Political Economy of Corporate Governance, 95 Amer. Econ. Rev.1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Delaware Corporate Law: Entstehungsgeschichte und Gründe für den Führungsanspruch im US-Gesellschaftsrecht, 101 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft200.Google Scholar
(2001), Neue Institionenökonomik und politische Institutionen, Frankfurt (Main): Lang.Google Scholar
(1998), Corporate Governance: The End of ‘L'exception Francaise’?, Columbia Business Law Review79.Google Scholar
(2002), The New Foreign Investment Guidelines and Market Reform in China, China Law & Practice, April 2002, 19.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Vorzugsaktien vor dem Hintergrund der Corporate Governance-Diskussion, Aktiengesellschaft57.Google Scholar
(1994), Vereinigtes Königreich, in: Jura Europae, Droit des societés, Munich: Gesellschaftsrecht, Beck.Google Scholar
(2003), American Corporate Reform Abroad: Sarbanes–Oxley and the Foreign Private Issuer, 4 European Business Organization Law Review213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piϐler, Benjamin (2001), Zur Rolle der Rechtsprechung im chinesischen Aktienmarkt. Erste Welle von Schadensersatzklagen chinesischer Anleger, Working Paper China Analysis No. 10, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Piϐler, Benjamin (2002a), Zur Rolle der Rechtsprechung im chinesischen Aktienmarkt: ein UpdateWorking Paper China Analysis No. 12, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Piϐler, Benjamin (2002b), Corporate Governance in der VR China: Neue Vorschriften für börsenzugelassene Gesellschaften-, Zur Rolle der Rechtsprechung im chinesischen Aktienmarkt: ein Update, Working Paper China Analysis No. 17, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Piϐler, Benjamin (2002c), Schritte zur Öffnung des chinesischen Kapitalmarkts für ausländische Anleger: Übertragung von staatseigenen Aktien und QFII-Methode, Working Paper China Analysis No. 19, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
Piϐler, Benjamin (2002d), Übersetzung mit Anmerkungen zu den Mitteilungen über den Erlass des ‘Standards der Corporate Governance börsenzugelassener Gesellschaften’, available at www.jura.uni-goettingen.de/chinarecht/020107.htm.
(2002), The Standardization of Law and Its Effect on Developing Economies, 50 Am. J. Comp. L. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, Katharina, Keinan, Yoram, Kleinheisterkamp, Jan, and West, Mark D. (2001), The Evolution of Corporate Law, Working Paper, available at www.worldbank.org/wdr/2001/bkgroundpapers/pistor.pdf.
, , , and (2002), The Evolution of Corporate Law, U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 751 (shorter version of the 2001 Working Papers).Google Scholar
, , and (2000), Law and Finance in Transition Economies, 8 Economics of Transition325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), Aktionärsklagen im französischen und deutschen Recht unter Einbeziehung der neueren Rechtsentwicklung in Belgien, Frankfurt (Main): Lang.Google Scholar
, , and (2002), Revising the Japanese Commercial Code: A Summary and Evaluation of the Reform Effort, Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs71.Google Scholar
(1994), Logik der Forschung, 10th edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (1st edition: 1934).Google Scholar
(1987), Das Elend des Historizismus, 6th edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (English: The Poverty of Historicism, 1947).Google Scholar
(1992), Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde (2 Volumes), Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 7th edition (English: The Open Society and Its Enemies, 1958).Google Scholar
(1973), Objektive Erkenntnis, Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe (English: Objective Knowledge, 1972).Google Scholar
(1993), The Rise of the Political Model of Corporate Governance and Corporate Control, 68 N.Y.U. L. Rev.1003.Google Scholar
(1995), The Promise of the Governed Corporation: The Limits of Economic Solutions, 73 Harvard Business Review89.Google Scholar
(2001), Shareholders and Corporate Governance: The Principle of One Share–One Vote, European Business Law Review67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Thou Shalt Not Sow Thy Vineyard with Divers Seeds? The Case Against the Harmonisation of Private Law, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 639.Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, Theo (2002), Takeover Regulation in Europe and America: The Needs for Functional Convergence, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 205.Google Scholar
Rahn, Gunther (1994), Recht und Rechtsmentalität in Japan, in: , and , Japanisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, New York: de Gruyter, p. 1.Google Scholar
, and (2003), The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century, 69 J. Finan. Econ. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), European Style of Corporate Governance at the Crossroads: The Role of Worker Involvement, 40 Journal of Common Market Studies111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), Die Hauptversammlung als oberstes Organ der Aktiengesellschaft, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
Regierungskommission Corporate Governance (2001), Unternehmensführung – Unternehmenskontrolle – Modernisierung des Aktienrechts.
(2002), Globalisierung. Die universelle Herausforderung, Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
(2006), Derivative Actions and the Funding Problem: The Way Forward, Journal of Business Law445.Google Scholar
(2002), Holzmüller-Kompetenz der Hauptversammlung beim Erwerb einer Unternehmensbeteiligung?, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht1091.Google Scholar
(1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Prometheus Books (cited version: London: Dent, 1973).Google Scholar
(2001), Hauptversammlung und Internet, 165 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht204.Google Scholar
Roberts, John, and Van den Steen, Eric (2000), Shareholder Interests, Human Capital Investment and Corporate Governance, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=230019.
(1995), America's Fascination with German Corporate Governance, Aktiengesellschaft291.Google Scholar
Rock, Edward, Kanda, Hideki, and Kraakman, Reinier (2004), Significant Corporate Actions, in: , , , , , , and , The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 131.Google Scholar
Rodatz, Peter (1995), Einige Bemerkungen zu den Besonderheiten im japanischen Gesellschaftsrecht, in: (ed.), Das Japanische im japanischen Recht, Munich: Iudicum, p. 247.Google Scholar
(2002), Rezension: Olaf Kliesow, Aktionärsrechte und Aktionärsklage in Japan, 13 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht299.Google Scholar
(1998), Stimmbindungsvereinbarungen in den Aktien- und GmbH-Rechten Deutschlands, Englands, Frankreichts und Belgiens: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung, Cologne: Heymanns.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani (1999), Modernization and the Confucian World, in: The Colorado College (ed.), Cultures in the 21st Century: Conflicts and Convergences, Colorado College Studies Number 32, p. 83.
(1991), A Political Theory of American Corporate Finance, 91 Columbia Law Review10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (1996a), Some Differences in Corporate Structure in Germany, Japan, and the United States, in: (ed.), Comparative Law – Law and the Legal Process in Japan, Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, p. 320 (also published in: (1993) 102 Yale L. J. 1927).Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (1996b), German ‘Populism’ and the Large Public Corporation, in: , , , and (eds.), European Economic and Business Law, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (1997), Path Dependence, Political Options, and Governance Systems, in: , and (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance – Essays and Materials, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 165.Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (2000), Political Preconditions to Separating Ownership from Corporate Control, 53 Stanford Law Review 539 (shorter version also published in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 113).Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. (2002), Corporate Law's Limits, 31 Journal of Legal Studies 233 (also published as: What Corporate Law Cannot Do, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 107).Google Scholar
(2003a), Political Determinants of Corporate Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romano, Roberta (2002), Less Is More: Making Institutional Investor Activism a Valuable Mechanism of Corporate Governance, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 507 (also published in: (2001) 18 Yale Journal on Regulation 174).Google Scholar
(2005), The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance, 114 Yale L. J.1521.Google Scholar
(2001), European Union Company Law Convergence Possibilities after Centros, 11 Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs. 121.Google Scholar
Rossi, Guido (2003), Do Good Governance Recommendations Change the Rules for the Board of Directors? in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 493.Google Scholar
(2000), Die ökonomischen Grundlagen eines Rechts der Publikumsgesellschaft, Zürich: Schulthess.Google Scholar
(2001), The End of Globalization: Why Global Strategy Is a Myth and How to Profit from the Realities of Regional Markets, New York: Amacon.Google Scholar
Ryn, Jean van (1990), Capital and Securities of Marketable Share Companies, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 5 II.Google Scholar
(2005), Should Global Rules Have Legal Teeth? Policing (WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control) vs. Good Citizenship (UN Global Compact), 10 Int. J. Bus. 363.Google Scholar
(2004), Zur anstehenden Novellierung des japanischen Gesellschaftsrechts, 18 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht210.Google Scholar
(2003), Corporations American Style or with a European Touch? Corporate Governance, Culture and Convergence, European Business Law Review471.Google Scholar
(1962), The New Commercial Code of Japan: Symbol of Gradual Progress Toward Democratic Goals, 50 Geo. L. J.478.Google Scholar
Schaede, Ulrike (1997), The ‘Old Boy’ Network and Government–Business Relationships in Japan, in: (ed.), Japan: Economic Success and Legal System, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Abwehrmöglichkeiten des Vorstands von börsennotierten Aktiengesellschaften bei feindlichen Übernahmeversuchen – ein Rechtsvergleich zwischen Deutschland und den USA, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht150.Google Scholar
, and (2000), Lehrbuch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts, 3rd edition, Berlin: Springer (English version: Economic Analysis of Civil Law, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Der deutsche Anteil an der Gestaltung des modernen japanischen Rechts- und Verfassungswesens: Deutsche Rechtsberater im Japan der Meiji-Zeit, Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
(2002), Neue Perspektiven für Banken in China nach dem World Trade Organization-Beitritt, Die Bank295.Google Scholar
, and (2004), Verabschiedete Gesetze: Bericht über die Gesetzgebungstätigkeit des japanischen Parlaments von der 156. bis zur 159. Sitzungsperiode, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht195.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Bedarf es einer neuen gesetzlichen Regelung des Anfechtungsrechts zur Bekämpfung räuberischer Aktionäre?, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht577.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Corporate Governance in China: Then and Now, Columbia Business Law Review1.Google Scholar
(2003), Die neuen Marktsegmente der Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse, Aktiengesellschaft57.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Dominique (1998), Gestaltungsfreiheit im französischen Gesellschaftsrecht, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Reinhard H., and Spindler, Gerald (2004), Path Dependence and Complementary in Corporate Governance, in: , and (eds.), Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Die Umstellung von Inhaber- auf Namensaktien durch deutsche Aktiengesellschaften, Berlin: Tenea.Google Scholar
Schnyder, Anton K. (2000), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht – zu Begriff und Phänomenologie, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 515.Google Scholar
(2000), Die Bedeutung der Lehre vom Rechtskreis und der Rechtskultur, 99 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft373.Google Scholar
Schruff, Wienand (1996), Accounting Standards in Practice, in: , , , and (eds.), European Economic and Business Law, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte-Kulkmann, Nicole (2003), Rechtszusammenarbeit im Kontext der europäisch-chinesischen Beziehungen, Working Paper China Analysis No. 24, available at www.chinapolitik.de/studien/index.htm.
(2003), Internationale Rechnungslegung für den Einzelabschluss und für Unternehmen, die den öffentlichen Kapitalmarkt nicht in Anspruch nehmen, ZIP93.Google Scholar
(1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit Interest and Business Cycle, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
(1987), Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie, 6th edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
(1999), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Principles of Corporate Governance – Grundsätze der Unternehmensführung und -kontrolle für die Welt, Aktiengesellschaft337.Google Scholar
(2004), Der Deutsche Corporate Governance-Kodex – eine private oder doch eine staatliche Regelung?, ZIP285.Google Scholar
(1998), Zivilisierung wider Willen. Der Konflikt der Kulturen mit sich selbst, Frankfurt (Main): Suhrkamp (English version: The Clash within Civilisations: Coming to Terms with Cultural Conflicts, London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Sharma, Rajesh (1999), Company Law, in: , and (eds.), Chinese Law, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 369.Google Scholar
Shishido, Zenichi (1997), Legal Monitoring Systems in Japan: Legal Possibilities and Current Practice, in: (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law, Volume 2, London: Kluwer Law International, p. 149.Google Scholar
(2000), Japanese Corporate Governance: The Hidden Problems of Corporate Law and Their Solutions, 25 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law189.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Corporate Governance in China – Obstacles and New Development, 29 International Business Lawyer455.Google Scholar
(1997), Vorzugsaktien als ‘Hybride’ Finanzierungsform und ihre Grenzen, 161 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht628.Google Scholar
(1995), Back to the Future: Appraisal Rights in the Twenty-First Century, 32 Harv. J. on Legis. 79.Google Scholar
(2000), Der Regierungsentwurf für ein Gesetz zur Namensaktie und zur Erleichterung der Stimmrechtsausübung (NaStraG), Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht626.Google Scholar
(2002a), Der Neoliberalismus als Modell für die Gesetzgebung?, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik170.Google Scholar
(2002c), Convergence, Competition, Centros and Conflicts of Law: European Company Law in the 21st Century, 27 E.L. Rev.47.Google Scholar
(2002d), Shareholders, Stakeholders and the ‘Ordoliberalism’, 13 European Business Law Review139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), Der anonyme Aktionär – The anonymous shareholder – L'actionnaire anonyme, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht218.Google Scholar
(2004a), Die Harmonisierung des Internationalen Deliktsrechts und die Einheit der Rechtsordnung, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft662.Google Scholar
(2004c), The European Directive on Cross-Border Mergers: An International Model?, 11 Colum. J. Eur. L. 167.Google Scholar
(2005a), The Impact of the European Company (Societas Europaea (European Company)) on Legal Culture, 30 E.L. Rev. 431.Google Scholar
(2005b), What Does Not Work in Comparing Securities Laws: A Critique on La Porta et al.'s Methodology, International Company and Commercial Law Review300.Google Scholar
(2005c), Anspruchsziele bei betrügerischen Täuschungen des Kapitalmarktes, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung184.Google Scholar
(2005d), Welche Auswirkung hat das neue Verfolgungsrecht der Aktionärsminderheit? – Eine rechtsvergleichende Folgenanalyse des § 148 AktG-E, 104 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft376.Google Scholar
(2005e), Numerical Comparative Law – Do We Need Statistical Evidence in Order to Reduce Complexity?, 13 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law521.Google Scholar
(2005f), The Case Against Harmonisation of Shareholder Rights, 6 European Business Organization Law Review539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Legal Adaptability in Elbonia, 2 International Journal of Law in Context 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007a), Legal Origins: Reconciling Law and Finance and Comparative Law, 52 McGill Law Journal 55.Google Scholar
(2007b), SEVIC: Beyond Cross-Border Mergers, European Business Organization Law Review 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005), Judicial Federalism in the European Court of Justice's Berlusconi Case: Towards More Credible Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting?, 46 Harv. Int'l L.J.487.Google Scholar
(2001), Why Must We Meet? Thinking about Why Shareholders Meetings Are Required, 19 C&SLJ506.Google Scholar
(1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (cited version: Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), A Comparative Analysis of the Proxy Machinery in Germany, Japan and the United States: Implications for the Political Theory of American Corporate Finance, 58 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 145.Google Scholar
(1999), Governing Economic Globalisation: Global Legal Pluralism and European Law, 5 European Law Journal331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), Französisches Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
, and (2000), Einführung in das französische Recht, 3rd edition, Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger (2006), On the Insignificance and/or Endogeneity of La Porta et al.'s ‘Anti-Director Rights Index’ under Consistent Coding, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=894301.
(2000), Internet und Corporate Governance – ein neuer virtueller (T)Raum?, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht420.Google Scholar
Spindler, Gerald (2006), Stimmrecht und Teilnahme an der Hauptversammlung, in: (ed.), Gesellschaftsrecht in der Diskussion 2005, Cologne: Dr Otto Schmidt, p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapledon, Geoff P., and Bates, Jonathan J. (2002), Reducing the Costs of Proxy Voting, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 567.Google Scholar
(1999), The Futility of Unification and Harmonization in International Commercial Law, 39 Va. J. Int'l L. 743.Google Scholar
(1999), Globalisierung der Wirtschaft und Rechtsprinzipien des Weltwirtschaftssystems, Festschrift Groϐfeld1173.Google Scholar
(2002), Reform des französischen Unternehmensrecht im Rahmen des Gesetzes über ‘Neue Wirtschaftliche Regulierungen’ vom 15.05.2001, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft409.Google Scholar
Stout, Lynn A. (2003), On the Export of US-Style Corporate Fiduciary Duties to Other Cultures: Can a Transplant Take?, in: (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), General Meetings: A Dispensable Tool for Corporate Governance of Listed Companies?, 11 Corporate Governance74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Systemwettbewerb als Herausforderung an Politik und Theorie, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Strine, Leo E. (2006), Towards a True Corporate Republic: A Traditionalist Response to Lucian's Solution for Improving Corporate America, 119 Harr. L. Rev. 1759.CrossRef
Takahashi, Eiji (1997), Changes in the Japanese Enterprise Groups?, in: (ed.), Japan: Economic Success and Legal System, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), Corporate Governance und die Reform des Gesellschaftsrechts in Deutschland und Europa, 16 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht121.Google Scholar
, and (2003), Liberalisierung des Erwerbs eigener Aktien in Japan, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft757.Google Scholar
, and (1998), Bestandsaufnahme: Die japanische Aktienrechtsreform des Jahres 1997, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft615.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Eiji and Rudo, Joachim (2000), Missbrauch von Aktionärsrechten in Japan und Deutschland, in , and (eds.), Recht in Japan, Volume 12, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 71.Google Scholar
, and (2004), Japanese Corporate Law: Important Cases in 2002 and 2003, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht241.Google Scholar
and (2005), Japanese Corporate Law: Important Cases in 2003 and 2004, 20 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht241.Google Scholar
and (2006), Japanese Corporate Law: Two Important Cases Concerning Takeovers in 2005, 21 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht231.Google Scholar
, and (2005), The Future of Japanese Corporate Governance: The 2005 Reform, 19 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht35.Google Scholar
(1988), Japan's Company Law and the Promotion of Corporate Democracy: A Futile Attempt?, 27 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 195.Google Scholar
(2004), Fundamental Issues of Corporate Governance in Japan, 17 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht5.Google Scholar
(2001), Corporate Governance in Europa, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht645.Google Scholar
(1999), Accounting in a Global Market and in an Electronic Age, Festschrift Groϐfeld1243.Google Scholar
(1995), Einführung, in: Steinemann, Matthias, Thümmel, Martin, and Zhang, Xuan, Kapitalgesellschaften in China, Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde, p. 5.Google Scholar
(1956), A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, 64 Journal of Political Economy416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasic, Roman, and Fu, Jian (1999), Company Law in China, in: (ed.), Company Law in East Asia, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 135.Google Scholar
(1993), International Regulatory Competition, Externalization, and Jurisdiction, 34 Harv. Int'l L.J.48.Google Scholar
(2002), Cross-Border Mergers: Problems and Solutions, 30 International Business Lawyer69.Google Scholar
Tunc, André (1991), Corporate Law, in: (ed.), European Business Law: Legal and Economic Analyses on Integration and Harmonization, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Junko (2000), Japan's Current Move Towards Statutory Reform: Is It a Breakthrough to a New Era?, in: (ed.), International Corporate Law, Volume 1, Oxford: Hart, p. 179.Google Scholar
(2005) A Comparative View of the Two Corporate Statutory Reforms: The UK and Japan, International Company and Commercial Law Review421.Google Scholar
(1999a), Die Aktionärsklage als Instrument zur Kontrolle des Vorstands- und Aufsichtsratshandelns, 163 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht290.Google Scholar
(1999b), Schutzinstrumente gegen die Gefahren aus der Geschäftstätigkeit inländischer Zweigniederlassungen von Kapitalgesellschaften mit fiktivem Auslandssitz, Juristenzeitung662.Google Scholar
(2001), The Business Judgment Rule and Shareholder Derivative Suits in Japan: A Comparison with Those in the United States, 14 N.Y. Int'l L. Rev. 129.Google Scholar
Vagts, Detlev F. (1972), Law and Accounting in Business Associations, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 12A.Google Scholar
Vagts, Detlev F. (1998), Gestaltungsfreiheit im amerikanischen Aktienrecht, in: , and , Gestaltungsfreiheit und Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, Detlev F. (2000), Securities Regulation – An Introduction, in: (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, Ch. 10.Google Scholar
(2000), Towards an Institutional Legal Framework for Regulatory Competition in Europe, 53 Kyklos435.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Governance in a Globalising World: Convergence or Divergence? A European Perspective, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Van der Elst, Christoph (2003), The Equity Markets, Ownership Structures and Control: Towards an International Harmonisation?, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 3.Google Scholar
, and (1998), Legal Cultures and Legal Paradigms: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law, 47 International and Comparative Law Quarterly495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2001), Die Auslegung von Gesetzen in England und auf dem Kontinent, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
(2002), The Globalization of Corporate Governance: Shareholder Protection, Hostile Takeovers and the Evolving Corporate Environment in France, 18 Conn. J. Int'l L. 1.Google Scholar
Wang, Jiang-yu (2000), China's Securities Experiment: The Challenge of Globalisation, available at www.geocities.com/pennwang/research/ressec/ressecindex.htm.
Wedderburn of Charlton, Lord (1985), The Legal Development of Corporate Responsibility: For Whom Will Corporate Managers Be Trustees? in: , and , Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Corporatization and Privatization: A Chinese Perspective, 22 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 219.Google Scholar
(2003), Comparative Corporate Governance: A Chinese Perspective, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Weller, Michael, and Zahn, Andreas (2000), Die Namensaktie in anderen Europäischen Ländern, in: Rosen, Rüdiger von, and Seifert, Werner G. (eds.), Die Namensaktie, Eschborn: DAI, p. 177.
, , and (2005), Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: An Empirical Analysis of the Compliance Statement by German Listed Companies, 13 Corporate Governance178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), European Community; Treaty establishing the European Community Company Law, Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets.Google Scholar
(2003a), The Societas Europaea (European Company) Company – A New Common European Company from 8 October 2003, European Business Law Review85.Google Scholar
(1999), Information, Institutions, and Extortion in Japan and the United States: Making Sense of Sokaiya Racketeers, 93 Nw. U. L. Rev. 767.Google Scholar
(2001a), The Puzzling Divergence of Corporate Law: Evidence and Explanations from Japan and the United States, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 528.Google Scholar
(2001b), Why Shareholders Sue: The Evidence from Japan, 30 J. Legal Stud. 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Sally (2002), Corporations and the Third Way. Oxford: Hart.
(2001), The Role of the Shareholder in Corporate Governance: A Theoretical Approach, 25 Melbourne U. L. Rev. 418.Google Scholar
(2002), Vorstandsmacht statt Bankenmacht?, 166 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht182.Google Scholar
(1989), Organverantwortung und Gesellschafterklagen in der Aktiengesellschaft, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, Wolfgang (2000), Die Amerikanisierung des Rechts, insbesondere des Bank- und Wirtschaftsrechts, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 601.Google Scholar
(1961), Interessen und Organisation der Aktiengesellschaft im amerikanischen und deutschen Recht, Karlsruhe: Müller.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Economic Globalization, 35 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 705.Google Scholar
, and (2005), An Emerging Third Way? The Erosion of the Anglo-American Shareholder Value Construct, 38 Cornell Int'l L.J.493Google Scholar
Windbichler, Christine (2000), Alternative Dispute Resolution v. Shareholders' Suits?, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 617.Google Scholar
Winter, Jaap (2003), Cross-Border Voting in Europe, in: , and (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 387.Google Scholar
Winter, Ralph K. (1980), State Law, Shareholder Protection, and Theory of the Corporation, in: , and , Economics of Corporation Law and Securities Regulation, Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, p. 91.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Anfechtungsklagen gegen Squeeze-out-Hauptversammlungsbeschlüsse wegen angeblicher Verfassungswidrigkeit, Aktiengesellschaft503.Google Scholar
(2001), Die Hauptversammlung im Wandel der Kommunikationsformen, Frankfurt (Main): Lang.Google Scholar
(2002), Corporate Governance. Der Import angelsächsicher ‘Self-Regulation’ im Widerstreit zum deutschen Parlamentsvorbehalt, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik59.Google Scholar
Wollschläger, Christian (1997), Historical Trends in Civil Litigation in Japan, Arizona, Sweden, and Germany: Japanese Legal Culture in the Light of Judicial Statistics, in: (ed.), Japan: Economic Success and Legal System, Berlin: de Gruyter, p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002), Foreign Law Firms Set to Expand in China, China Law & Practice, March 2002, 54.Google Scholar
(2000), Corporate Governance: Remedying and Ratifying Directors' Breaches, 116 Law Quarterly Review638.Google Scholar
(2001b), Shares and Shareholders: Property, Power and Entitlement, 22 Comp. Law. 258 and 307.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Michael, and Labermeier, Alexander (2000), Rechtliche Behandlung, Übertragung und Börsenhandel von Namensaktien in den USA, in: , and (eds.), Die Namensaktie, Eschborn: DAI, p. 143.Google Scholar
Wymeersch, Eddy (2000), Centros: A Landmark Decision in European Company Law, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 629.Google Scholar
(2001a), Company Law in Europe and European Company Law, in: 1st European Jurists Forum, Baden-Baden: Nomos, p. 85.Google Scholar
(2001b), Gesellschaftsrecht im Wandel: Ursachen und Entwicklungslinien, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht294.Google Scholar
Wymeersch, Eddy (2001c), Current Company Law Reform Initiatives in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Countries: Challenges and Opportunities, available at www.law.rug.ac.be/fli/WP/WPindex.html.
Wymeersch, Eddy (2002), Convergence or Divergence in Corporate Governance Patterns in Western Europe?, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 230.Google Scholar
(2003), The Transfer of the Company's Seat in European Company Law, 40 Common Market Law Review661.Google Scholar
Wymeersch, Eddy (2005), Implementation of Corporate Governance Codes, in: , , , and (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 403.Google Scholar
(2006), Enforcement of Corporate Governance Codes, 6 Journal of Corporate Law Studies113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Centros: Is This Really the End for the Theory of the Siege Reel, 22 Comp. Law. 2.Google Scholar
(2006), Institutional Shareholder Activism in China: Law and Practice, 17 International Company and Commercial Law Review251 and 287.Google Scholar
(2001), New Regulations for E-Commerce in Japan, 12Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht145.Google Scholar
(2003), Neue Entwicklungen im Japanischen Bilanzrecht: Die Reform des Jahres 2003, 15 Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht111.Google Scholar
(2001), Shareholding and Board Structures of German und UK Companies, 22 Comp. Law. 47.Google Scholar
(2001), China's Entry into the World Trade Organization: Impact on China's Regulating Regime of Foreign Direct Investment, 35 Int. L. 195.Google Scholar
(1999), Modernization and the Confucian World, in: The Colorado College (ed.), Cultures in the 21st Century: Conflicts and Convergences, Colorado College Studies Number 32, p. 37.Google Scholar
Zetzsche, Dirk (2004), Explicit and Implicit System of Corporate Control – A Convergence Theory of Shareholder Rights, Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=600722.
, and (2001), Foreign Investment Companies Limited by shares: The Latest Chinese Organization for Major International Ventures, 21 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 409.Google Scholar
(2002), Der Beitritt der Volksrepublik China zur World Trade Organization: rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und Auswirkungen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht208.Google Scholar
(1963), Die Schranken mitgliedschaftlicher Stimmrechtsmacht bei den privatrechtlichen Personenverbänden, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
(2000), Zur Problematik der aktienrechtlichen Anfechtungsklage, Aktiengesellschaft145.Google Scholar
Zuleeg, Manfred (2000), Federalization Through Law – An Evergreen, in: , , and (eds.), Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law (Liber Amicorum Buxbaum), London: Kluwer, p. 669.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer (2006a), Spaces and Places: A Systems Theory Approach to Regulatory Competition in European Company Law, 12 European Law Journal 534.
Zumbansen, Peer (2006b), The Parallel Worlds of Corporate Governance and Labor Law, 13 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 261.
(1949–50), Rechtsvergleichung als universale Interpretationsmethode, 15 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht5.Google Scholar