Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T17:21:27.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The rise and fall of the contrastive hierarchy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

B. Elan Dresher
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Introduction: Jakobson and his collaborators

The work of Roman Jakobson and his colleagues merits a separate discussion. Many of the main ideas in Trubetzkoy's Gründzuge were worked out in collaboration with Jakobson. To Jakobson is due the notion of the distinctive feature. Whereas Trubetzkoy allowed features to be gradual (multivalued), Jakobson eventually proposed that all features are binary. The notion that language and cognition crucially involve binary dichotomies became central to Jakobson's thinking, and this idea was later taken over into generative phonology.

In the 1950s and early 1960s, Roman Jakobson, Morris Halle and their colleagues wrote a series of publications that laid the groundwork for the next phase of distinctive feature theory and what eventually became the theory of generative phonology. Much critical attention, then and afterwards, was directed at various aspects of their theory that struck observers as being the most controversial and innovative, such as the nature of distinctive features, the relation of phonemes to allophones, and the organization of the grammar.

What is of greatest interest for our present purposes is an aspect of their work that attracted relatively less attention. This is their development and utilization of a contrastive hierarchy of distinctive features. We have seen that such a hierarchy is already implicit in much of Trubetzkoy (1939), and it could be that this was one source of the idea. It also fits well with Jakobson's general emphasis on dichotomies as a fundamental aspect of cognition: if the distinctive feature is grounded in a binary discrimination, then it makes sense that an inventory is built up via a succession of such binary splits.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×