Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Historical roots of the psychological laboratory
- 3 Divergence of investigative practice: The repudiation of Wundt
- 4 The social structure of psychological experimentation
- 5 The triumph of the aggregate
- 6 Identifying the subject in psychological research
- 7 Marketable methods
- 8 Investigative practice as a professional project
- 9 From quantification to methodolatry
- 10 Investigating persons
- 11 The social construction of psychological knowledge
- Appendix
- Notes
- Index
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Historical roots of the psychological laboratory
- 3 Divergence of investigative practice: The repudiation of Wundt
- 4 The social structure of psychological experimentation
- 5 The triumph of the aggregate
- 6 Identifying the subject in psychological research
- 7 Marketable methods
- 8 Investigative practice as a professional project
- 9 From quantification to methodolatry
- 10 Investigating persons
- 11 The social construction of psychological knowledge
- Appendix
- Notes
- Index
Summary
All but one of the tables that appear in chapters 4, 5, 6, and 8 summarize parts of a content analysis of empirical articles published in psychological journals during the discipline's early years. The selection of journal volumes and articles for inclusion in this analysis was based on the following considerations.
Four basic reference points – 1895, 1910, 1925, and 1935 – were chosen for the purpose of establishing time trends. Journal volumes published during those years were included in the analysis as were the immediately preceding and the immediately following volume. For each set of three consecutive volumes of a journal, the results of the analysis were pooled to allow for minor fluctuations from one year to the next. This yielded data for the periods 1894–1896, 1909–1911, 1924–1926, and 1934–1936. There were minor discrepancies, as when the results of the analysis of the first three volumes of a journal that began publication in 1910 were included in the 1909–1911 period.
Only one of the journals analyzed, the American Journal of Psychology, provided a source of empirical articles over the entire period. The other journals began publication at a later stage or ceased publishing empirical studies in significant numbers at some point. The second decade of the twentieth century was a particularly fertile one in terms of the appearance of new American journals. For tracing changes in these journals the 1910 reference point was therefore impractical.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constructing the SubjectHistorical Origins of Psychological Research, pp. 199 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1990