Acierno, Louis (1994): The History of Cardiology, London and New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Marcus (2009): “Empirical Evidence and the Knowledge-That/Knowledge-How Distinction”, Synthese, vol. 170, pp. 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, Theodor et al. (eds.) (1969): Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, Neuwied, Berlin: Hermann Luchterhand Verlag.Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1963/1993): “Wertfreiheit als methodisches Prinzip”, in Beckerath, Erwin von and Giersch, Herbert (eds.): Probleme der Normativen Ökonomik und der Wirtschaftspolitischen Beratung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1963, pp. 32–63 and reprinted in Topitsch, Ernst (ed.): Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, 12th ed., Athenäum, Hain, Hanstein: Neue wissenschaftliche Bibliothek, 1993, pp. 196–225.Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1966): “Theorie und Praxis: Max Weber und das Problem der Wertfreiheit und der Rationalität”, in Oldemeyer, Ernst (ed.): Die Philosophie und die Wissenschaften, Simon Moser zum 65. Geburtstag, Meisenheim, pp. 246–272 and reprinted in Albert and Topitsch (1979), pp. 200–236.Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1968/1985): Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1969): “Der Mythos der totalen Vernunft: Dialektische Ansprüche im Lichte undialektischer Kritik”, in Adorno, et al. (eds.): (1969), pp. 193–234.Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1975): Transzendentale Träumereien, Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1982): Die Wissenschaft und die Fehlbarkeit der Vernunft, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1987): Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (2010): “The Economic Tradition and the Constitution of Science”, Public Choice, vol. 144, pp. 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Hans and Topitsch, Ernst (eds.) (1979): Werturteilsstreit, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Albert, Max (2011): “Methodology and Scientific Competition”, Episteme, vol. 8, pp. 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Max, Schmidtchen, Dieter, and Voigt, Stefan (eds.) (2008): Scientific Competititon, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Alt, James and Crystal, K. Alec (1983): Political Economics, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elisabeth (2004): “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce”, Hypatia, vol. 19, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, John R. (2010): Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 7th ed., New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar

Anderson, Lanier (2003): “The Debate over the Geisteswissenschaften in German Philosophy, 1880–1910”, in Baldwin, Thomas (ed.): The Cambridge History of Philosophy: 1870–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 221–234.Google Scholar

Andrews, Kristin (2016): “Animal Cognition”, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/cognition-animal/.Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto (1973): “Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft und die Grundlagen der Ethik: Zum Problem einer rationale Begründung der Ethik im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft”, in Transformation der Philosophie, Bd. 2, Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 358–435.Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto (1976): “Sprechakttheorie und transzendentale Sprachpragmatik zur Frage ethischer Normen”, in Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 10–173.Google Scholar

Arabatzis, Theodore (2006): “On the Inextricability of the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification”, in Schickore, Jutta and Steinle, Friedrich (eds.): Revisiting Discovery and Justification, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arabatzis, Theodore (2017): “What’s in It for the Historian of Science? Reflections on the Value of Philosophy of Science for History of Science”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 31, pp. 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arabatzis, Theodore and Kindi, Vasso (2013): “The Problem of Conceptual Change in the Philosophy and History of Science”, in Vosniadou, Stella (ed.): International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 343–359.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1957): Metaphysica, (ed.) Jaeger, Werner, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1996): Politics, (ed.) Everson, Stephen, Politics and The Constitution of Athens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, John L. (1962): How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ayer, Alfred Jules (1936/1952): Language, Truth and Logic, 2nd ed., New York: Dover Edition.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert (1986): “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms”, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, pp. 1095–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Francis (1620/2000): The New Organon, (eds.) Jardine, Lisa, and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert (1986): Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bargh, John and Chartrand, Tanya (1999): “The Unbearable Automaticity of Being”, American Psychologist, vol. 54, pp. 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechtel, William and Abrahamsen, Adele (2005): “Explanation: A Mechanistic Alternative”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernholz, Peter, Streit, Manfred E., and Vaubel, Roland (1998): Political Competition, Innovation and Growth, Berlin and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bicchieri, Cristina (2005): The Grammar of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bicchieri, Cristina (2016): Norms in the Wild, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biddle, Justin (2013): “State of the Field: Transient Underdetermination and Values in Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 44, pp. 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2007): “What Is Scientific Progress?”, Noûs, vol. 41, pp. 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2016): “Scientific Progress”, in Humphreys, Paul (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 544–563.Google Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2019): “The Aim of Belief and the Aim of Science”, Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, vol. 34, pp. 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2023): “The Epistemic Approach: Scientific Progress as Accumulation of Knowledge”, in Shan, Yafeng, (ed.): New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon and Simmons, Keith (eds.) (1999): Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon (1971/1993): “Moral Realism” in Casey, J. (ed.): Morality and Moral Reasoning, London: Methuen, 1971, reprinted in Essays on Quasi-Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 111–123.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon (1988): Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon (1993): Essays on Quasi-Realism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaug, Mark (1997): Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloor, David (1976/1991): Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (1976): Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit: Studien zur Staatstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Bokulich, Alisa (2018): “Representing and Explaining: The Eikonic Conception of Scientific Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 85, pp. 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouterse, Jeroen and Karstens, Bart (2015): “A Diversity of Divisions: Tracing the History of the Demarcation between the Sciences and the Humanities”, Isis, vol. 106, pp. 341–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyd, Richard (1988): “How to Be a Moral Realist”, in Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (ed.): Essays on Moral Realism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 187–228.Google Scholar

Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. (1985): Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. (2009): “Culture and the Evolution of Human Cooperation”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 364, pp. 3281–3288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyer-Kassem, Thomas, Mayo-Wilson, Conor, and Weisberg, Michael (eds.) (2018): Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge: New Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James (1985): The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bresson, Alain (2016): The Making of the Ancient Economy: Institutions, Markets, and Growth in the City States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Brigandt, Ingo (2015): “Social Values Influence the Adequacy Conditions of Scientific Theories: Beyond Inductive Risk”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 45, pp. 326–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bright, Liam Kofi (2017): “On Fraud”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 174, pp. 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bright, Liam Kofi (2018): “Du Bois’ Democratic Defence of the Value Free Ideal”, Synthese, vol. 195, pp. 2227–2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, David (1989): Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Matthew J. (2013): “Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James (1975): The Limits of Liberty. Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James (1989): “The Relatively Absolute Absolutes”, in Buchanan, James (ed.): Essays in Political Economy, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 96–109.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James (2001): “Law and the Invisible Hand”, in Moral Science and Moral Order, the Collected Works of James M. Buchanan Vol. 17, Indianapolis: The Liberty Press, pp. 96–109.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James and Tullock, Gordon (1962): The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bueter, Anke (2015): “The Irreducibility of Value-Freedom to Theory Assessment”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 49, pp. 18–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burke, Edmund (1791/1962): An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs, ed. Robson, J. M., Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald (1965): “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution”, in Barringer, Herbert R., Blanksten, George I., and Mack, Raymond W. (eds.): Social Change in Developing Areas, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, pp. 19–49.Google Scholar

Capella, Martianus (1977): The Marriage of Philology and Mercury, (eds.) Stahl, William Harris and Burge, E. L., New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Carrier, Martin (2013): “Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladenness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude”, Science & Education, vol. 22, pp. 2547–2568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrier, Martin (2017): “Facing the Credibility Crisis of Science: On the Ambivalent Role of Pluralism in Establishing Relevance and Reliability”, Perspectives on Science, vol. 25, pp. 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrier, Martin (2018): “Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissens”, in Christian, A. et al. (eds.): Philosophy of Science – Between the Natural Sciences, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities, New York: Springer, pp. 155–169.Google Scholar

Carrier, Martin (2022): “What Does Good Science-Based Advice to Politics Look Like?”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 53, pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakravartty, Anjan (2017): Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology, Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Hasok (2012): Is Water H₂O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Berlin and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ChoGlueck, Christopher (2018): “The Error Is in the Gap: Synthesizing Accounts for Societal Values in Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 85, pp. 704–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clauberg, Johannes (1654): Logica, Vetus & Nova, Amsterdam: Ex Officina Elzeviriana.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald (1937): “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, vol. 4, pp. 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, Ronald (1960): “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Floris (2015): The Rise of Modern Science Explained: A Comparative History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, James (1990a): Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, James (1990b): “The Emergence of Norms”, in Hechter, Michael, Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Wippler, Reinhard (eds.): Social Institutions, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 35–59.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry (2023): “Science as Craftwork with Integrity”, in Ludwig, David, Koskinen, Inkari, Mncube, Zinhle, Poliseli, Luana, and Reyes-Galindo, Luis (eds.): Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 296–307.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat (1785): Essai sur l’ Application de l’ Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix, Paris: L’ Imprimerie Royale, Facsimile edition: New York, Chelsea, 1972.Google Scholar

Contessa, Gabriele (2021): “On the Mitigation of Inductive Risk”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 11, p. 64, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00381-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Congleton, Roger (1989): “Efficient Status Seeking: Externalities, and the Evolution of Status Games”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 11, pp. 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, John (1997): Plato, Complete Works, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Copp, David (2015): “Explaining Normativity”, Proceedings and Addresses of American Philosophical Association, vol. 89, 2015, pp. 48–73.Google Scholar

Craver, Carl (2007): Explaining the Brain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craver, Carl (2014): “The Ontic Account of Scientific Explanation”, in Kaiser, Marie et al. (eds.): Explanation in the Special Sciences: The Case of Biology and History, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’ Andrade, Roy (1995): The Development of Cognitive Anthropology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damasio, Antonio (1994): Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar

Damasio, Antonio (1999): The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness, New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine (1992): “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 22, pp. 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daston, Lorraine (2014): “Objectivity and Impartiality: Epistemic Virtues in the Humanities”, in The Making of the Humanities, Vol. III, The Modern Humanities, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2007): Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald (1984): Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Davies, Martin (2015): “Knowledge (Explicit, Implicit and Tacit): Philosophical Aspects”, in Wright, James D. (ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., vol. 13, London: Elsevier, pp. 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deaton, Angus and Cartwright, Nancy (2018): “Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Controlled Experiments”, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 210, pp. 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Maistre, Joseph (1794–1795/1965): “Study on Sovereignty”, in Lively, J. (ed.): Works, New York: Macmillan, pp. 93–130.Google Scholar

De Melo-Martín, Inmaculada and Intemann, Kristen (2016): “The Risk of Using Inductive Risk to Challenge the Value-Free Ideal”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 83, pp. 500–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dellsén, Finnur (2021): “Understanding Scientific Progress: The Noetic Account”, Synthese, vol. 199, pp. 11249–11278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dellsén, Finnur (2023): “The Noetic Approach: Scientific Progress as Enabling Understanding”, in Shan, Yafeng (ed.): New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 62–81.Google Scholar

Denzau, Arthur and North, Douglass C. (1994): “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions”, Kyklos, vol. 47, pp. 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, Michael (2011): “Methodology and the Nature of Knowing How”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 108, pp. 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhami, Sanjit (2017): The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dietrich, Michael and Honnenberger, Philip (2020): “Duhem’s Problem Revisited: Logical vs. Epistemic Formulations and Solutions”, Synthese, vol. 197, pp. 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul (1997): “Culture and Cognition”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 23, pp. 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter (eds.) (1991): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm (1883/1990): Gesammelte Schriften, I. Band: Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften, 9. Auflage, Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft und Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm (1924/1990): Gesammelte Schriften V. Band: Die geistige Welt. Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Erste Hälfte: Abhandlungen zur Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften, 8. Auflage, Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft und Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm (1927/1992): Gesammelte Schriften VII. Band: Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften, 8. unv. Auflage, Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft und Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixit, Avinash, Skeath, Susan, and Reiley, David (2015): Games of Strategy. 4th ed., New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Donald, Merlin (1991): The Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dorato, Mauro (2004): “Epistemic and Nonepistemic Values in Science”, in Machamer, Peter and Wolters, Gereon (eds.): Science, Values and Objectivity, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorr, Cian, Nebel, Jacob, and Zuehl, Jake (2022): “The Case for Comparability”, forthcoming in Noûs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Heather (2000): “Inductive Risk and Values in Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, pp. 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Heather (2004): “The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity”, Synthese, vol. 138, pp. 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Heather (2009): Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dressel, Markus (2022): “Inductive Risk: Does It Really Refute Value-Freedom?”, Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, vol. 37, pp. 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duhem, Pierre (1906/1981): La Théorie Physique. Son Objet – Sa Structure, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Duhem, Pierre (1908/2003): Sauver les Apparences. ΣΩΖΕΙΝ ΤΑ ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΑ, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Duhem, Pierre (1915): La Science Allemande, Paris: Librairie Scientifique A. Hermann & Fils.Google Scholar

Dupré, John (2007): “Fact and Value”, in Kincaid, Harold, Dupré, John, and Wylie, Alison (eds.): Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eddington, Arthur (1920): Space, Time and Gravitation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elbert, George (2004): “Evidence, Logic and Moral Authority: Experience and the Erosion of Certainties in Illiterate and Literate Societies”, in Carrier, Martin, et al. (eds.): Knowledge and the World: Challenges beyond the Science Wars, Berlin: Springer, pp. 211–236.Google Scholar

Elgin, Catherine (2017): True Enough, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James (2009): The Endurance of Nations Constitutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert (1991): Order without Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Kevin C. (2017): The Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Kevin C. (2022): Values in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Kevin C. and Daniel, J. McKaughan (2009): “How Values in Scientific Discovery and Pursuit Alter Theory Appraisal”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 76, pp. 598–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Kevin C. and Daniel, J. McKaughan (2014): “Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 81, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Kevin C. and Steel, Daniel (eds.) (2017): Current Controversies in Values and Science, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon (1989a): The Cement of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon (1989b): Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon (2012): “The Optimal Design of a Constituent Assembly”, in Landemore, Hélène and Elster, Jon (eds.): Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 148–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon (2015): Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jon, Elster et al. (eds.) (2018): Constituent Assemblies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ensminger, Jean (1992): Making a Market: The Institutional Transformation of an African Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ensminger, Jean and Henrich, Joseph (eds.) (2014): Experimenting with Social Norms: Fairness and Punishment in Cross-Cultural Perspective, New York: Russell Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Estlund, David (2008): Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fara, Patricia (2009): Science. A Four Thousand Year History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Adam (1767/1966): An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Fernández Pinto, Manuela (2020): “Commercial Interests and the Erosion of Trust in Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 87, pp. 1003–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul (1975/2010): Against Method, 4th ed., London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul (1976/1991): “Second Dialogue”, in Feyerabend, Paul (eds.): Three Dialogues on Knowledge, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 47–123.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul (1978): Science in a Free Society. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar

Files, Craig (1996): “Goodman’s Rejection of Resemblance”, British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 36(4), pp. 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, Arthur (1998): “The Viewpoint of No-One in Particular”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 72, pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Føllesdal, Dagfinn (1979): “Hermeneutics and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method”, Dialectica, vol. 33, pp. 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franco, Paul (2017): “Assertion, Nonepistemic Values, and Scientific Practice”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 84, pp. 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeth, Tony, Alexander, Jones, Steele, John M., and Yanis, Bitsakis (2008): “Calendars with Olympiad and Eclipse Prediction on the Antikythera Mechanism”, Nature, vol. 454, pp. 614–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Freeth, Tony and Alexander, Jones (2012): “The Cosmos in the Antikythera Mechanism”, Institute for the Study of the Ancient World (ISAW) Papers 4, available at http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/4/.Google Scholar

Freeth, Tony, Higgon, David, Dacanalis, Aris, MacDonald, Lindsay, Georgakopoulou, Myrto, and Wojcik, Adam (2021): “A Model of the Cosmos in the Ancient Greek Antikythera Mechanism”, Nature Scientific Reports, vol. 11, p. 5821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael (1974): “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 71, pp. 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael (2001): The Dynamics of Reason, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael (2002): “Kant, Kuhn, and the Rationality of Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 69, pp. 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael (2011): “Extending the Dynamics of Reason”, Erkenntnis, vol. 75, pp. 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frigg, Roman and Hunter, Matthew (eds.) (2010): Beyond Mimesis and Convention. Representation in Art and Science, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galston, William A. (2011): “Pluralist Constitutionalism”, in Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred D., Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey, Paul (eds.): What Should Constitutions Do?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gascoigne, John (2019): Science and the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geddes, Barbara, Wright, Joseph, and Frantz, Erica (2014): “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 12, pp. 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gemtos, Petros (2016): Methodologia ton koinonikon epistimon (Methodology of the Social Sciences), 5^th enlarged edition, Athens: Papazisis.Google Scholar

Gentner, Derdre, Holyoak, Keith, and Kokinov, Boicho (eds.) (2001): The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbard, Allan (1990): Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbard, Allan (2003): Thinking How to Live, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbard, Allan (2014): Meaning and Normativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Giere, Ronald (2006): Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd (2007): Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd (2008): Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd (2021): “Axiomatic Rationality and Ecological Rationality”, Synthese, vol. 198, pp. 3547–3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd and Selten, Reinhard (eds.) (2001): Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd, Hertwig, Ralph, and Thorsten, Pachur (eds.) (2011): Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Paul, and the ABC Group (1999): Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gintis, Herbert (2009): Game Theory Evolving, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Glanzberg, Michael (ed.) (2018): The Oxford Handbook of Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glymour, Clark (1980): Theory and Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gomperz, Heinrich (1939): Interpretation: Logical Analysis of a Method of Historical Research, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert and Spiekermann, Kai (2018): An Epistemic Theory of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grandy, Richard (1973): “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70(14), pp. 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, Gabriel (2013): “Beyond Resemblance”, Philosophical Review, vol. 122, pp. 215–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, Paul and Levitt, Norman (1994): Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Grundmann, Thomas (2017): Analytische Einführung in die Erkenntnistheorie, 2nd ed., Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guala, Francesco (2009): The Methodology of Experimental Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guala, Francesco (2016): Understanding Institutions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1965/1969): “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, in Habermas, Jürgen (ed.): Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”, 3rd ed., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 146–168.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1969a): “Analytische Wissenschaftstheorie und Dialektik. Ein Nachtrag zur Kontroverse zwischen Popper und Adorno”, in Adorno, et al. (eds.): (1969), pp. 155–191.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1969b): “Gegen einen positivistisch halbierten Rationalismus”, in Adorno, et al. (eds.): (1969), pp. 235–266.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian (1983): Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadfield, Gillian and Weingast, Barry (2014): “Constitutions as Coordinating Devices”, in Galiani, Sebastian and Sened, Itai (eds.): Institutions, Property Rights, and Economic Growth: The Legacy of Douglass North, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, Frank (1982): “Reflections on the Invisible Hand”, Lloyds Bank Review, vol. 144, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A. (1986): Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France, Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter and Taylor, Rosemary (1998): “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, in Soltan, Karol, Uslaner, Eric, and Haufler, Virginia (eds.): Institutions and Social Order, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 15–43.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell (1989): “Why a Constitution?”, in Grofman, B. and Wittman, D. (eds.): The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 100–120.Google Scholar

Hare, Richard (1952): The Language of Morals, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Harvey, William (1628/1989): Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus, English translation by Robert Willis in The Works of William Harvey, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatzimoysis, Anthony (2002): “Analytical Descriptivism Revisited”, Ratio, vol. 15, pp. 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatzis, Aristides (2015): “Moral Externalities: An Economic Approach to the Legal Enforcement of Morality”, in Aristides and Nicholas Mercuro (eds.): Law and Economics: Philosophical Issue and Fundamental Questions, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1960): The Constitution of Liberty, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1973/1982): Rules and Order, Vol. I of Law, Legislation and Liberty, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1976/1982): The Mirage of Social Justice, Vol. II of Law, Legislation and Liberty, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1979/1982): The Political Order of a Free People, Vol. III of Law, Legislation and Liberty, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heesen, Remco (2017): “Communism and the Incentive to Share in Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 84, pp. 698–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heiner, Ronald (1993): “The Origin of Predictable Behavior”, American Economic Review, vol. 73, pp. 560–595.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl (1942/1965): “The Function of General Laws in History”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, pp. 35–48 and reprinted in: Carl Hempel: Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: Free Press, pp. 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, Carl (1965): “Science and Human Values”, in Hempel, Carl (ed.): Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: Free Press, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar

Henschen, Tobias (2021): “How Strong Is the Argument from Inductive Risk?”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 11, p. 92, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00409-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hicks, Daniel J. (2014): “A New Direction for Science and Values”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 3271–3295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas (1651/1991): Leviathan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holman, Bennett and Wilholt, Torsten (2022): “The New Demarcation Problem”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 91, pp. 211–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holland, John, Holyoak, Kenneth, Nisbett, Richard, and Thagard, Paul (1986): Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, Charles A. (2019): Markets, Games, and Strategic Behavior: An Introduction to Experimental Economics, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Holyoak, Kenneth and Thagard, Paul (1995): Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel (2017): “Is There an Emancipatory Interest? An Attempt to Answer Critical Theory’s Most Fundamental Question”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 25, pp. 908–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howson, Colin and Urbach, Peter (2006): Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, 3rd ed., Chicago: Open Court Publishing House.Google Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (2023): “Objectivity, Value-Free Science, and Inductive Risk”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-023-00518-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Robert (2016): “Why We Should Not Reject the Value-Free Ideal of Science”, Perspectives on Science, vol. 24, pp. 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, David L. (1988): Science as a Process, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, David (1997): “What’s Wrong with Invisible-Hand Explanations?” Philosophy of Science, vol. 64, pp. S117–S126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David (1748/1968): Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ivanova, Milena (2010): “Pierre Duhem’s Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 41, pp. 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivanova, Milena (2011): “Good Sense in Context: A Response to Kidd”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 42, pp. 610–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivanova, Milena and Paternotte, Cedric (2013): “Theory Choice, Good Sense and Social Consensus”, Erkenntnis, vol. 78, pp. 1109–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank (1998): From Metaphysics to Morals: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank and Pettit, Philip (1995): “Moral Functionalism and Moral Motivation”, Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 45, pp. 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeger, Werner (1936–1947): Paideia, 3 volumes, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

James, William (1896): “The Will to Believe”, New World, vol. 5, pp. 327–347.Google Scholar

Jardine, Nick and Frasca-Spada, Marina (1997): “Splendours and Miseries of the Science Wars”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 28, pp. 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarvie, Ian (2001): The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper’s Social View of Science 1935–1945, Atlanta: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas (1789/1958): “Letter to James Madison, 6 September 1789”, in Oberg, Barbara B. (ed.): The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 15, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jeffrey, Richard (1956): “Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 22, pp. 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, Stephen (2019): “Science, Truth and Dictatorship: Wishful Thinking or Wishful Speaking?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 64–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

John, Stephen (2021): Objectivity in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson-Laird, Philip (1983): Mental Models, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, Philip (2006): How We Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Jones, Eric L. (2003): The European Miracle, 3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalligas, Paul (2016): “Platonic Astronomy and the Development of Ancient Sphairopoiia”, Rhizomata, vol. 4(2), pp. 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keuth, Herbert (1989): Wissenschaft und Werturteil, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Keuth, Herbert (1993): Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung?, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Khalifa, Kareem (2017): Understanding, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kidd, James (2011): “Pierre Duhem’s Epistemic Aims and the Intellectual Virtue of Humility: A Reply to Ivanova”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 42, pp. 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kincaid, Harold, Dupré, John, and Wylie, Alison (eds.) (2007): Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (1981): “Explanatory Unification”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 48, pp. 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (1989): “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in Kitcher, Philip and Salmon, Wesley (eds.): Scientific Explanation, volume 13 of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 410–505.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (1990): “The Cognitive Division of Labor”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 87, pp. 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (1993): The Advancement of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (2001): Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (2011a): Science in a Democratic Society, New York: Prometheus Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (2011b): The Ethical Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (2021): Moral Progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (2023): “Scientific Progress and the Search for Truth” in Gonzalez, Wenceslao (ed.): Current Trends in the Philosophy of Science (Chapter 9) Synthese Library, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Knight, Jack (1992): Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koethe, John (2002): “Stanley and Williamson on Knowing How”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, pp. 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koertge, Noretta (ed.) (1998): A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koertge, Noretta (2000): “Science, Values, and the Value of Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, pp. S45–S57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine (1996): The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine (2003): “Realism and Constructivism in 20th Century Ethics”, Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 28(Supplement), pp. 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskinen, Inkeri (2020): “Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 1187–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskinen, Inkeri (2022): “How Institutional Solutions Meant to Increase Diversity in Science Fail”, Synthese, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskinen, Inkeri (2023): “Participation and Objectivity”, Philosophy of Science, forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krementsov, Nicolai (1997): Stalinist Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, Wolfgang (1985): Reflexive Letztbegründung: Untersuchungen zur Transzendentalpragmatik, Freiburg i.Br.: Alber Verlag.Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, Wolfgang (2010): Unhintergehbarkeit: Studien zur Transzendentalpragmatik, Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas (1962/1970): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas (1977): “Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice”, in The Essential Tension, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacey, Hugh (1999): Is Science Value-Free? Values and Scientific Understanding, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lacey, Hugh (2005): “On the Interplay of the Cognitive and the Social in Scientific Practices”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 977–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakatos, Imre (1970): “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landemore, Hélène (2012): “Collective Wisdom: Old and New”, in Landemore, Hélène and Elster, Jon (eds.): Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lange, Marc (2016): Because without Cause: Non-Causal Explanations in Science and Mathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larkin, Jill H. and Simon, Herbert (1987): “Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words”, Cognitive Science, vol. 11, pp. 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve (1979/1986): Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry (1977): Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry (1981): “A Problem-Solving Approach to Scientific Progress”, in Hacking, Ian (ed.): Scientific Revolutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–155.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry (1984): Science and Values, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry (1987): “Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry (1990): Science and Relativism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, Larry (2004): “The Epistemic, the Cognitive, and the Social”, in Machamer, Peter and Wolters, Gideon (eds.): Science, Values and Objectivity, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, Thomas C. (2002): “Reflections on Rules in Science: An Invisible-Hand Perspective”, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 9, pp. 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, Isaac (1960): “Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments?”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. LVII, pp. 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, Isaac (1962): “On the Seriousness of Mistakes”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 29, pp. 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, Margaret (1988): Of Rule and Revenue, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, John David (2011): “Constitutional and Fundamental Law: The Lesson of Classical Greece”, in Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred D., Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey, Paul (eds.): What Should Constitutions Do?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindquist, K., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., and Barrett, L. F. (2012): “The Brain Basis of Emotion: A Meta-Analytic Review”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 35(3), pp. 121–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

List, Christian and Pettit, Philip (2011): Group Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locke, John (1690): An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London: Thomas Basset.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longino, Helen (1990): Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longino, Helen (2002): The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longino, Helen (2013): Studying Human Behavior, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad (1941): “Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie”, Blätter für deutsche Philosophie, vol. 15(1), pp. 95–124.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin (2022): Against Constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Love, Alan C. (2015): “Collaborative Explanation, Explanatory Roles and Scientific Explaining in Practice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl (2000): “Thinking about Mechanisms”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacFie, Alec (1971): “The Invisible Hand of Jupiter”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 32, pp. 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnus, P. D. (2013): “What Scientists Know Is Not a Function of What Scientists Know”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 840–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnus, P. D. (2022): “The Scope of Inductive Risk”, Metaphilosophy, vol. 53, pp. 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.) (2015): Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malpighi, Marcello (1661/1929): De Pulmonibus epistolae II ad Borellium, 1661, English translation by James Young: Malpighi’s “De Pulmonibus”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 23, 1929, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malzbender, T. and Gelb, D. (2006): Polynomial Texture Mapping, Hewlett-Packard Mobile and Media Systems Laboratory. www.hpl.hp.com/research/ptm/.Google Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2001): Individuals, Institutions, and Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2005): Naturalistic Hermeneutics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2013): “Explanatory Games”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. CX, pp. 602–632.Google Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2014): “Text Interpretation as a Scientific Activity”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 45, pp. 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2016): Explanatory Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2021a): “Science, Institutions, and Values”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 29, pp. 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2021b): “Institutions and Scientific Progress”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 51, pp. 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C., North, Douglass, and Shariq, Syed (2004): “Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 2, pp. 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, James (1999): The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

McAdams, Richard (1997): “The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms”, Michigan Law Review, vol. 96(1997), pp. 338–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCauley, Robert (2000): “The Naturalness of Religion and the Unnaturalness of Science”, in Keil, Frank and Wilson, Robert (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, John (1998): “Virtue and Reason”, in Mind, Value, and Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 50–73.Google Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard (1940): Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan (1983/2012): “Values in Science”, in Asquith, Peter D. and Nickles, Thomas (eds.): Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 3–28, reprinted in: Zygon, vol. 47, 2012, pp. 686–709.Google Scholar

Meier, Georg Friedrich (1757/1996): Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegungskunst, mit einer Einleitung und Anmerkungen, (eds.) Axel Bühler and Luigi Cataldi Madonna, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Menger, Carl (1871/1968): Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Menger, Carl (1871/1976): Principles of Economics, Arlington, VA: The Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar

Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan (2017): The Enigma of Reason, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert (1943/1973): “The Normative Structure of Science”, in Merton, Robert (ed.): The Sociology of Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 268–278.Google Scholar

Meyer, John (2010): “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 36, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mill, John Stuart (1843/1974): A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. VIII, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat Baron de (1748/1989): The Spirit of the Laws, trans. A. Cohler, B. Miller, and H. Stone, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary (2012): The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moe, Terry (2005): “Power and Political Institutions”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 3, pp. 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, Dennis (2003): Public Choice III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Ernest (1961): The Structure of Science, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Thomas (1986): The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas (2012): Mind and Cosmos, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nau, Heino Heinrich (ed.) (1996): Der Werturteisstreit. Die Äußerungen zur Werturteilsdiskussion im Ausschuß des Vereins für Socialpolitik (1913), Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar

Nee, Victor and Brinton, Mary (eds.) (1998): The New Institutionalism in Sociology, New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Nee, Victor and Ingram, Paul (1998): “Embeddedness and Beyond: Institutions, Exchange and Social Structure”, in Nee, Victor and Brinton, Mary C. (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Sociology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 19–45.Google Scholar

Needham, Joseph (1978): The Shorter Science and Civilization in China (prepared under the supervision by Colin A. Ronan), vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander (1981): “The Postulated Author: Critical Monism as a Regulative Ideal”, Critical Inquiry, vol. 8, pp. 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander (1985): “Convergence and Methodology in Science and Criticism”, New Literary History, vol. 17 on Philosophy of Science and Literary Theory, pp. 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander (1987): “Writer, Text, Work, Author”, in Cascardi, A. J. (ed.): Literature and the Question of Philosophy, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 267–291.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard (1959): “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, pp. 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nersessian, Nancy (2008): Creating Scientific Concepts, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newell, Allen and Simon, Herbert (1972): Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Nickelsen, Kärin (2022): “Cooperative Division of Cognitive Labour: The Social Epistemology of Photosynthesis Research”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 53, pp. 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nickles, Thomas (2021): “Historicist Theories of Scientific Rationality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/rationality-historicist/.Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, Ilka (2014): “Scientific Progress as Increasing Verisimilitude”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 46, pp. 73–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Niiniluoto, Ilka (2023): “The Semantic Approach: Scientific Progress as Increased Truthlikeness”, in Shan, Yafeng (ed.): New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 27–45.Google Scholar

Nisbett, Richard and Ross, Lee (1980): Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. (1981): Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, Douglass C. (1994): “Economic Performance through Time”, American Economic Review, vol. 84, pp. 359–368.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. (2005): Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, Douglass C., Wallis, John, and Weingast, Barry (2009): Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, John (1993): “The Determination of Theory by Evidence: The Case for Quantum Discontinuity, 1900–1915”, Synthese, vol. 97, pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, John (2008): “Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory?”, in Martin, Carrier, Howard, Don, and Kourany, Janet (eds.): The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 17–44.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah (2015): The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oddie, Graham (2014): “Truthlikeness”, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/truthlikeness/.Google Scholar

Opp, Karl-Dieter (1982): “The Evolutionary Emergence of Norms”, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, Heinrich Bernhard (1871): “Manchesterschule und Kathedersozialismus”, National-Zeitung, vol. 7. Dezember, Nr. 573, 24, p. 1.Google Scholar

Ordeshook, Peter (1992): “Constitutional Stability”, Constitutional Political Economy, vol. 3, pp. 137–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor (1990): Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor (2005): Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Papineau, David (1999): “Normativitiy and Judgment”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, vol. 73, pp. 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmieri, Paolo (2012): “Signals, Cochlear Mechanics and Pragmatism: A New Vista of Human Hearing?”, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, pp. 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pamuk, Zeynep (2021): Politics and Expertise. How to Use Science in a Democratic Society, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Parfit, Derek (2011): On What Matters, Vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parker, Wendy and Winsberg, Eric (2018): “Values and Evidence: How Models Make a Difference”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 8(125), pp. 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, Wendey (2020): “Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose Approach”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 87, pp. 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pascal, Blaise (1670/2000): Pensées, Paris: Librairie Générale Française.Google Scholar

Penn, Derek C. and Povinelli, Daniel J. (2007): “On the Lack of Evidence that Non-human Animals Possess Anything Remotely Resembling a ‘Theory of Mind’”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, vol. 362, pp. 731–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perini, Laura (2005a): “The Truth in Pictures”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 262–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perini, Laura (2005b): “Visual Representations and Confirmation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 913–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, Philip (1997): Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip (2012): On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Picavet, Emmanuel (2020): “Ways of Compromise-Building in a World of Institutions”, in Andina, Tiziana and Peter Bojanic (eds.): Institutions in Action. The Nature and Role of Institutions in the Real World, Heidelberg and New York: Springer, pp. 135–145.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul (2004): Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plutynski, Anya (2018): Explaining Cancer: Finding Order in Disorder, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Poincaré, Henri (1919): La Morale et la Science: Dernières Pensées, Paris: Ernest Flammarion.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael (1958): Personal Knowledge, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael (1962): “The Republic of Science”, Minerva, vol. I, pp. 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, Michael (1966): The Tacit Dimension, Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar

Pollock, Ethan (2008): Stalin and the Soviet Science Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1934/2003): The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1944/1957): The Poverty of Historicism, first published in Economica, N.S., vol. XI, no. 42 and 43, 1944 and vol. XII, no 46, 1945 and appeared as a book in London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1945/2002): The Open Society and Its Enemies, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1963): Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1972): Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1994): The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Potochnik, Angela (2017): Idealization and the Aims of Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Derek de Solla Price (1974): “Gears from the Greeks: The Antikythera Mechanism – A Calendar Computer from ca. 80 B.C.”, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society New Series, vol. 64, pp. 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pryke, Louise (2016): “Religion and Humanity in Mesopotamian Myth and Epic”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Psillos, Stathis (1999): Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Psillos, Stathis (2015): “Evidence: Wanted, Alive or Dead”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 45, pp. 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Hilary (1981): Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Hilary (2002): The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard van Orman (1951/1980): “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, in From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard van Orman (1960): Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Raatikainen, Panu (2022): “Truth and Theories of Truth”, in Stalmaszczyk, Piotr, (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–232.Google Scholar

Radnitzky, Gerhard (1981): “Wertfreiheitsthese: Wissenschaft, Ethik und Politik”, in Radnitzky, Gerhard and Andersson, Gunnar (eds.): Voraussetzungen und Grenzen der Wissenschaft, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 47–126.Google Scholar

Railton, Peter (1981): “Probability, Explanation and Information”, Synthese, vol. 48, pp. 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Railton, Peter (1986): “Moral Realism”, Philosophical Review, vol. 95, pp. 163–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John (1971): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reichenbach, Hans (1938): Experience and Prediction, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, Hans (1951): The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiss, Julian (2015): “A Pragmatist Theory of Evidence”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 82, pp. 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiss, Julian and Sprenger, Jan (2020): “Scientific Objectivity”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas (1997): Objectivity: The Obligations of Impersonal Reason, Notre Dame, IN and London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Resnik, David (1998): The Ethics of Science: An Introduction, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Resnik, David and Elliott, Kevin (2019): “Value-Entanglement and the Integrity of Scientific Research”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 75, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Resnik, David and Elliott, Kevin (2023): “Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, published online 22 February 2023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rice, Collin (2021): Leveraging Distortions: Explanation, Idealization and Universality in Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickert, Heinrich (1929): Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung: Eine logische Einleitung in die historischen Wissenschaften, 5. Auflage, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Riker, William (1980): “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions”, American Political Science Review, vol. 74, pp. 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rolin, Kristina (2015): “Values in Science: The Case of Scientific Collaboration”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 82, pp. 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Richard (1979/2018): Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Tobias (2004): “Is Knowing-How Simply a Case of Knowing-That?”, Philosophical Investigations, vol. 27, pp. 370–379.Google Scholar

Rothschild, Emma (1994): “Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand”, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 84, pp. 319–322.Google Scholar

Rothschild, Emma (2002): Economic Sentiments, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rowbottom, Darrell (2014): “Aimless Science”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 1211–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudner, Richard (1953): “The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 20, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert (1949): The Concept of Mind, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Rysiew, Patrick (2021): “Epistemic Contextualism”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley (1984): Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sankey, Howard (2019): “Objectivity in Science”, in: PhilPapers.Google Scholar

Sankey, Howard (2021): “Realism and the Epistemic Objectivity of Science”, Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy, vol. 35, pp. 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen (2002): “Amazing Knowledge”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, pp. 200–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schindler, Samuel (2018): Theoretical Virtues in Science: Uncovering Reality through Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur (1851): “Über Religion: Ein Dialog”, in Parerga and Paralipomena, §174, Kapitel 15, Berlin: Verlag A. W. Hayn.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, Erwin (1958): Mind and Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Andrew S. (2017): “Using Democratic Values in Science: An Objection and (Partial) Response”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 84, pp. 1044–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Andrew S. (2021): “Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Andrew S. (2022): “The Limits of Democratizing Science: When Scientists Should Ignore the Public”, Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Mark (2008): Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schurz, Gerhard and Carrier, Martin (eds) (2013): Werte in den Wissenschaften. Neue Ansätze zum Werturteilsstreit, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Scriven, Michael (1972): “The Exact Role of Value Judgments in Science”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 219–247.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya (2006): “What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. CIII, pp. 175–208.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya (2009): The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Servetus, Miguel (1553/2008): Christianismi Restitutio, Vienne, English translation: The Restoration of Christianity, by Christopher A. Hoffmann and Marian Hiller, Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

Shackle, G. L. S. (1979): Imagination and the Nature of Choice, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Shan, Yafeng (2019): “A New Functional Approach to Scientific Progress”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 86, pp. 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shan, Yafeng (2023): “The Functional Approach. Scientific Progress as Increased Usefulness”, in Shan, Yafeng (ed.): New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 46–61.Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven (1996): The Scientific Revolution, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth (1986): “Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions”, in Weisberg, Herbert (ed.): Political Science: The Science of Politics, New York: Agathon, pp. 51–81.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth (1989): “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 1, pp. 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth (2006): “Rational Choice Institutionalism”, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah, and Rockman, Bert (eds.): Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert (1983): Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Siraisi, Nancy (1981): Tadeo Alderotti and His Pupils: Two Generations of Italian Medical Learning, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin (1969): “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 8, pp. 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin (1972): “Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts”, New Literary History, vol. 3, pp. 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin (1975): “Hermeneutics and the Role of History”, New Literary History, vol. 7, pp. 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skow, Bradford (2018): Causation, Explanation, and the Metaphysics of Aspect, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam (1759/1976): The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam (1776/1976): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, (ed.) Cannan, Edwin, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam (1759/1980): Essays in Philosophical Subjects, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Michael (1994): The Moral Problem, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Snell, Bruno (1946/2009): Die Entdeckung des Geistes: Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen, 9th ed., Göttingen: Vandnhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Snow, P. C. (1959/1993): The Two Cultures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott (2002): “What Is the Problem of Simplicity?” in Zellner, Arnold, Keuzenbach, Hugo, and McAleer, Michael (eds.): Simplicity, Inference and Econometric Modelling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sokal, Alan (1996): “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity”, Social Text, vol. 46/47, pp. 217–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sokal, Alan and Bricmont, Jean (1997): Inpostures Intellectuelles, Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Stanley, Jason (2011): Know How, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, Jason and Williamson, Timothy (2001): “Knowing How”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 98, pp. 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steel, Daniel (2010): “Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 77, pp. 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steele, Katie (2012): “The Scientist qua Policy Advisor Makes Value Judgments”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 79, pp. 893–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterelny, Kim (2012): The Evolved Apprentice: How Evolution Made Humans Unique, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, Charles Leslie (1937): “The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms”, Mind, vol. 46, pp. 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Street, Sharon (2006): “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 127, pp. 109–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strevens, Michael (2006a): “The Role of the Priority Rule in Science”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. C, pp. 55–79.Google Scholar

Strevens, Michael (2006b): “The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, pp. 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strevens, Michael (2008): Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Strevens, Michael (2020): The Knowledge Machine: How an Unreasonable Idea Created Modern Science, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Stump, David (2007): “Pierre Duhem’s Virtue Epistemology”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 38, pp. 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stump, David (2011): “The Scientist as Impartial Judge: Moral Values in Duhem’s Philosophy of Science: New Perspectives on Pierre Duhem’s The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory” (book symposium), in: Metascience, vol. 20, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Sturgeon, Nicholas (1988): “Moral Explanations”, in Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (ed.): Essays on Moral Realism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 229–255.Google Scholar

Svoronos, Ioannes N. (1908): Das Athener Nationalmuseum, Athens: Beck & Barth.Google Scholar

Teller, Paul (2008): “Representation in Science”, in Psillos, Stathis and Curd, Martin (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 435–441.Google Scholar

Thagard, Paul (2012): The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery and Conceptual Change, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen (2004): How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, Michael (2016): A Natural History of Human Morality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Topitsch, Ernst (1958): Vom Ursprung und Ende der Metaphysik: Eine Studie zur Weltanschauungskritik, Wien: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trout, J. D. (2016): Wondrous Truths: The Improbable Triumph of Modern Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George (2002): Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George (2017): “The Time Inconsistency of Long Constitutions”, Summer Bulletin of American Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 42–45.Google Scholar

Tullock, Gordon (1987): Autocracy, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ullmann-Margalit, Edna (1977): The Emergence of Norms, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ullmann-Margalit, Edna (1978): “Invisible-Hand Explanations”, Synthese, vol. 39, pp. 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Fraassen, Bas (1980): The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Fraassen, Bas (2008): Scientific Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vesalius, Andreas (1543): De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem, Basel: Johannes Oporinus, English translation: On the Fabric of the Human Body, by William Frank Richardson and John Burd Carman, vol. 5 containing Books VI: The Heart and Associated Organs and Book VI: The Brain (Novato CA: Norman Anatomy Series, No 5).Google Scholar

Virvidakis, Stelios (1996): La robustesse du bien: Essai sur le réalisme moral, Paris: Editions Jacqueline Chambon.Google Scholar

Voigt, Stefan (1999): Explaining Constitutional Change, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voigt, Stefan (2020): Constitutional Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallis, Charles (2009): “Consciousness, Context, and Know-How”, Synthese, vol. 160, pp. 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Max (1904/1985): “Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis”, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 1904 and reprinted in: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, ed. Johannes Winckelmann, 6th ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 146–214.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1913/1996): “Gutachten zur Werturteilsdiskussion im Ausschuß des Vereins für Sozialpolitik”, in Nau, Heino Heinrich (ed.): Der Werturteilsstreit. Die Äußerungen zur Werturteilsdiskussion im Ausschuß des Vereins für Sozialpolitik (1913), Marburg: Metropolis Verlag, pp. 147–186.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1917/1985): “Der Sinn der >>Wertfreiheit<< der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften” in Winckelmann, Johannes (ed.): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 6th ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 489–540.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1917/2004): Science as a Vocation, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing House.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1922/1992): Wirschaft und Gesellschaft, 5th ed., Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Wedgwood, Ralph (2007): The Nature of Normativity, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry (1997): “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law”, American Political Science Review, vol. 91, pp. 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar