Crocker, H. G., The extent of the marginal sea: a collection of official documents and views of representative publicists (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1919).Google Scholar

United Nations Legislative Series, Laws and regulations on the regime in the high seas, vol. 1 (New York: United Nations, 1951).Google Scholar

Whiteman, M. M., Digest of international law, vol. 4 (Washington, DC: Department of State, 1965).Google Scholar

Aguilar Mawdsley, A., ‘Law of the sea: the Latin American view’, in Pontecorvo, G. (ed.), The new order of the oceans (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 158–198.Google Scholar

Alvarez, A., ‘Impressions left by the first Hague conference for the codification of international law’, Transactions of the Grotius Society 16 (1930), 119–129.Google Scholar

Amin, S., and Anderson, W. H. L. (trans.), Empire of chaos (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Anand, R. P. (ed.), Law of the sea: Caracas and beyond (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980).Google Scholar

Anand, R. P. Origin and development of the law of the sea: history of international law revisited (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, W., ‘DOD delays decision on advanced ICBM’, Aerospace Technology (11 September 1967), 16.Google Scholar

Arntzen, S., ‘Fiskerigrensesaken mellom England og Norge for den internasjonale domstol i Haag’, Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 2 (1952), 113–136.Google Scholar

Austin, C. F., ‘Rock site – a way into the sea’, Sea Frontiers 13 (1957), 342–352.Google Scholar

Barkenbus, J. N., Deep seabed resources: politics and technology (New York: Free Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Baslar, K., The concept of the common heritage of mankind in international law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1997).Google Scholar

Beckman, R., ‘The international regime governing the safety of navigation and the prevention of pollution in international straits’, Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 2 (1998), 350–392.Google Scholar

Bedjaoui, M., Towards a new international economic order (Paris: UNESCO/Holmes & Meier, 1979).Google Scholar

Bethlehem, D., ‘The secret life of international law’, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 1 (2012), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, K., Military implications of the changing law of the sea’, in Gamble, J. K. (ed.), Law of the sea: neglected issues (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Law of the Sea Institute, 1979), pp. 328–397.Google Scholar

Bourquin, M., ‘La portée général de l’arrêt rendu le 18 Décembre 1951 par le Cour Internationale de Justice dans l’affaire Anglo-Norvégienne des pêcheries’, Nordisk Tidsskrift and International Ret og Jus Gentium 22 (1952), 101–132.Google Scholar

‘Brazil straitjackets foreign research’, Scientific Research (17 February 1969), 15.Google Scholar

Brown, E. D., ‘The 1994 agreement on the implementation of part XI of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: breakthrough to universality?’, Marine Policy 19 (1995), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. D., ‘The lessons of the Torrey Canyon: international law aspects’, Current Legal Problems 21 (1968), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, W. T., ‘National legislation on ocean authority zones and the contemporary law of the sea’, Ocean Development and International Law 9 (1981), 289–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butcher, J. G., and Elson, R. E., Sovereignty and the sea: how Indonesia became an archipelagic state (Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Buttigieg, J., ‘Arvid Pardo – a diplomat with a mission’, Symposia Melitensia 12 (2016), 13–28.Google Scholar

Buttieg, J., ‘The common heritage of mankind: from the law of the sea to the human genome and cyberspace’, Symposia Melitensia 8 (2012), 81–92.Google Scholar

Buzan, B., ‘Negotiating by consensus: developments in techniques at the United Nations conference on the law of the sea’, American Journal of International Law 75 (1981), 324–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, B., Seabed politics (New York: Praeger, 1976).Google Scholar

Cable, J., Gunboat diplomacy 1919–1991: political applications of limited naval force, 3rd ed. (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caminos, H., ‘The legal régime of straits in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye 205 (1987), 9–246.Google Scholar

Carty, A., ‘The Corfu Channel case – and the missing Admiralty orders’, Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 3 (2004), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castañeda, J., ‘Negotiations on the exclusive economic zone at the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea’, in Makarczyk, J. (ed.), Essays in international law in honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984), pp. 605–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘The new regime of the oceans: illusion and reality’, Indian Journal of International Law 22 (1982), 69–89.Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R., and Lowe, A. V., The law of the sea, 3rd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Clingan, T. A., ‘Emerging law of the sea: the economic zone dilemma’, San Diego Law Review, 14 (1977), 530–547.Google Scholar

Craven, J. P., ‘Sea power and the sea bed’, United States Naval Institute Proceedings 92 (April 1966), 36–51.Google Scholar

Dean, A. H., ‘Achievements at the law of the sea conference’, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 53 (1959), 186–197.Google Scholar

Dean, A. H., ‘Freedom of the seas’, Foreign Affairs 37 (1958), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, A. H., ‘The second Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: the fight for freedom of the seas’, American Journal of International Law 54 (1960), 751–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickinson, E. D., ‘Jurisdiction at the maritime frontier’, Harvard Law Review 40 (1926), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Djalal, H., ‘The developing countries and the Law of the Sea Conference’, Indonesian Quarterly 9 (1981), 59–72.Google Scholar

Djalal, H., Indonesia and the law of the sea (Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 1995).Google Scholar

Dupuy, R.-J., The law of the sea: current problems (Leiden: A. W. Sijhoff, 1974).Google Scholar

Eichelberger, C. M. (ed.) (report for the Commission to Study the Organization of the Peace), New dimensions for the United Nations: the problems of the next decade (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana, 1966).Google Scholar

Emran, A., ‘The regulation of vessel-source pollution in the straits of Malacca and Singapore’ (University of Wollongong Thesis Collection, 2007).Google Scholar

Engo, P. B., ‘Issues of first committee at UNCLOS III’, in Koers, A. W. and Oxman, B. H. (eds.), The 1982 Convention of the Law of the Sea (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Law of the Sea Institute, 1983), pp. 33–52.Google Scholar

Evensen, J., ‘The Anglo-Norwegian fisheries case and its legal consequences’, American Journal of International Law 46 (1952), 609–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evensen, J., ‘Present military uses of the seabed and foreseeable developments’, Cornell International Law Journal 3 (1970), 121–132.Google Scholar

Fagin, B., Fishing: how the sea fed civilization (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenwick, J., International profiles on marine scientific research (Woods Hole, MA: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1992).Google Scholar

Ferreira, P. S., ‘The role of African states in the development of the law of the sea at the third United Nations conference’, Ocean Development & International Law 7 (1979), 89–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fincham, C., and van Rensburg, W., Bread upon waters: the developing law of the sea (Jerusalem: Turtledove Publishing, 1980).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. G., ‘The case of the I’m Alone’, British Year Book of International Law 17 (1936), 82–111.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. G., ‘The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–54: general principles and sources of law’, British Year Book of International Law 30 (1953), 1–70.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. G., ‘The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–1954: points of substantive law I’, British Year Book of International Law 31 (1954), 371–429.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. G., ‘Some results of the Geneva conference on the law of the sea’, International Comparative and Law Quarterly 8 (1959), 73–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

François, J. P. A., ‘La deuxième conference sur le droit de la mer’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Internationaal Recht 7 (1960), 249–254.Google Scholar

François, J. P. A., ‘Second International Conference on the Law of the Sea’, United Nations Review 6 (1960), 12–14.Google Scholar

Franssen, M. N., ‘Oceanic research and the developing nation perspective’, in Wooster, W. S. (ed.), Freedom of oceanic research (New York: Crane, Russak & Co., 1973), pp. 179–200.Google Scholar

Frommer, A. M., ‘The British hovering acts: a contribution to the study of the contiguous zone’, Revue belge de droit international 16 (1981–1982), 434–458.Google Scholar

Fulton, T. W., The sovereignty of the sea (Edinburgh: William Blackwood & Sons, 1911).Google Scholar

Galindo Pohl, R., ‘The exclusive economic zone in the light of negotiations of the third United Nations conference on the law of the sea’, in Orrego Vicuńa, F. (ed.), The exclusive economic zone: a Latin American perspective (Epping: Bowker Publishing, 1984), pp. 31–59.Google Scholar

Galindo Pohl, R., ‘Latin America’s influence and role at the third conference on the law of the sea’, Ocean Development & International Law 7 (1979), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gidel, G. C., Le droit international public de la mer: le temps de paix, 3 vols. (Chateauroux: Mellottee, 1932–1934).Google Scholar

Gidel, G. C., ‘La mer territoriale et la zone contiguë’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye 48 (1934), 133–278.Google Scholar

Goodier, J. L., ‘How to mine marine minerals’, World Mining (July 1967), 44–47.Google Scholar

Green, L. C., ‘The Anglo-Norwegian fisheries case, 1951’, Modern Law Review 15 (1952), 373–377.Google Scholar

Gutteridge, J. A. C., ‘The 1958 Convention on the Continental Shelf’, British Year Book of International Law 35 (1959), 102–123.Google Scholar

Hamzah, B. A., ‘Managing marine pollution in the straits of Malacca and Singapore: personal observations’, Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 2 (1998), 464–467.Google Scholar

Heinzen, B., ‘The three-mile limit, preserving the freedom of the seas’, Stanford Law Review 11 (1959), 597–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, L. L., ‘The modern concept of the off-lying archipelago in international law’, Canadian Yearbook of International Law 23 (1985), 172–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, A. P., and Colombos, C. J., The international law of the sea, 2nd rev. ed. (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1951).Google Scholar

Hill, N., ‘Shipping subsidies as an international problem’, International Affairs (London) 12 (1933), 327–343.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. H. N., ‘The Anglo-Norwegian fisheries case’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1 (1952), 145–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joyner, C. C., ‘Legal implications of the concept of the common heritage of mankind’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 35 (1986), 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keith, K. J., ‘“Naval secrets”, public interest immunity and open justice’, in Bannelier, K. et al. (eds.), The ICJ and the evolution of international law: the enduring impact of the Corfu Channel case (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 124–146.Google Scholar

Kildow, J. A. T., ‘Nature of the present restrictions on oceanic research’, in Wooster, W. S. (ed.), Freedom of oceanic research (New York: Crane, Russak & Co., 1973), pp. 5–28.Google Scholar

Kirton, A. G., and Vasciannie, S. C., ‘Deep seabed mining under the law of the sea convention and the implementation agreement: developing country perspectives’, Social and Economic Studies 51 (2002), 63–115.Google Scholar

Klein, N., Maritime security and the law of the sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, T. T. B., ‘The territorial sea, contiguous zone, straits and archipelagos under the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea’, Malaya Law Review 29 (1987), 163–199.Google Scholar

Kusumaatmadja, M., ‘The concept of the Indonesian archipelago’, Indonesian Quarterly 4 (1982), 12–26.Google Scholar

Kusumaatmadja, M., ‘Supplementary remarks’, in Alexander, L. M. (ed.), The law of the sea: needs and interests of the developing countries (Kingston, RI: Law of the Sea Institute and University of Rhode Island, 1973), 172–177.Google Scholar

Leifer, M., International straits of the world: Malacca, Singapore, and Indonesia (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonardo, L., ‘Overlapping entitlements between the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles and the exclusive economic zone’ (University of Woolongong Thesis Collection, 2019).Google Scholar

Li, Y., Transfer of technology for deep sea-bed mining: the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention and beyond (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar

Long, D. M., The Soviet merchant fleet – its growth, strategy, strength and weaknesses (London: Lloyd’s of London Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V., ‘The commander’s handbook on the law of naval operations and the contemporary law of the sea’, in Robertson, H. B. (ed.), The law of naval operations (International Law Studies, vol. 64) (Newport, RI: Naval War College Press, 1991), pp. 109–147.Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V., ‘The development of the concept of the contiguous zone’, British Year Book of International Law 52 (1981), 109–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mangone, G. J., Law for the world ocean – Tagore law lectures (London: Stevens & Sons, 1981).Google Scholar

McLaughlin, R., ‘Dangerous waters and international law: the Corfu Channel case, warships, and sovereignty irritants’, in Bannelier, K. et al. (eds.), The ICJ and the evolution of international law: the enduring impact of the Corfu Channel case (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 164–180.Google Scholar

Mendelson, M. H., Review Essay: ‘The flux and reflux of the law of the sea’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 5 (1985), 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mero, J. L., The mineral resources of the sea (Amsterdam: Elsevier Oceanography Series, 1965).Google Scholar

Meyer, T. A., ‘Tanker design features and the safety of navigation’, Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 2 (1998), 517–526.Google Scholar

Miles, E. L., Global ocean politics: the decision process at the third United Nations conference on the law of the sea: 1973–1982 (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998).Google Scholar

Miles, E. L., ‘Some socio-cultural problems involved in expanding use of marine protein concentrate for human consumption’, in Mershon Center for Education in National Security/Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (eds.), Second conference on law, organization and security in the use of the ocean (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1967), pp. 3–33.Google Scholar

Moore, J. N., ‘The regime of straits and the third United Nations conference on the law of the sea’, American Journal of International Law 74 (1980), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morell, J. B., The law of the sea: an historical analysis of the 1982 treaty and its rejection by the United States (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co., 1992).Google Scholar

Morgan, G. R., and Staples, D. J., The history of industrial marine fisheries in southeast Asia, RAP Publication 2006/12 (Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organisation, 2006).Google Scholar

Mostert, N., Supership (London: Macmillan, 1975).Google Scholar

Nandan, S. N., and Anderson, D. H., ‘Straits used for international navigation: a commentary on part III of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea 1982’, British Year Book of International Law 60 (1989), 159–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Njenga, F. X., ‘Historical background of the evolution of the exclusive economic zone and the contribution of Africa’, in Pontecorvo, G. (ed.), The new order of the oceans (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 125–157.Google Scholar

Nordquist, M. H., et al. (eds.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: a commentary, 7 vols. and supplementary documents (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985–).Google Scholar

Noyes, J. E., ‘Treaty interpretation and definitions of the law of the sea convention: comments on “Defining terms in the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention”’, California Western International Law Journal 32 (2002), 367–383.Google Scholar

Nyerere, J. K., Freedom and a new world economic order (Dar es Salaam: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

O’Connell, D. P., ‘International law and contemporary naval operations’, British Year Book of International Law 44 (1970), 19–86.Google Scholar

O’Connell, D. P., ‘The law of the sea’, Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 124 (1976), 367–379.Google Scholar

O’Connell, D. P.,and Shearer, I. A. (ed.), The international law of the sea, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982, 1984).Google Scholar

Ocean Policy Committee of the Commission of International Relations NAS-NRC, ‘The marine scientific research issue in the law of the sea negotiations’, Science 197 (15 July 1977), 230–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD, ‘OECD study on flags of convenience’, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 4 (1973), 231–254.Google Scholar

Oliver, E. F., ‘Malacca: dire straits’, United States Naval Institute Proceedings (June 1973), 26–33.Google Scholar

Oxman, B. H., From cooperation to conflict: the Soviet Union and the United States at the third UN conference on law of the sea (Seattle: Washington Sea Grant/Institute for Marine Studies, University of Washington, 1985).Google Scholar

Oxman, B. H., ‘The preparation of article 1 of the Convention on the Continental Shelf’, 3 pts., Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 3 (1972) 245 (pt. 1), 445 (pt. 2), 683 (pt. 3).Google Scholar

Panel of Oceanography, President’s Science Advisory Committee, Effective use of the sea (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1966).Google Scholar

Pardo, A., ‘Law of the sea conference – what went wrong’, in Friedheim, R. L. (ed.), Managing ocean resources: a primer (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979), pp. 137–148.Google Scholar

Pardo, A., and Christol, C. Q., ‘The common interest: tension between the whole and the parts’, in Macdonald, R. St. J. and Johnston, D. M. (eds.), The structure and process of international law: essays in legal philosophy doctrine and theory (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983), pp. 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pirtle, C. E., ‘Military uses of ocean space and the law of the sea in the new millennium’, Ocean Development & International Law 31 (2000), 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Proelss, A., United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: a commentary (Munich: C. H. Beck, Hart, Nomos, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Purver, R. G., ‘Canadian foreign policy and the military uses of the seabed’, in Johnson, B. J. and Zacher, M. W. (eds.), Canadian foreign policy and the law of the sea (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1977), pp. 203–254.Google Scholar

Rao, P. C., The new law of maritime zones, with special reference to India’s maritime zones (New Delhi: Milind Publications, 1983).Google Scholar

Rauch, E., ‘Military uses of the ocean’, German Yearbook of International Law 28 (1985), 229–267.Google Scholar

Reisman, W. M., and Skinner, C. P., Fraudulent evidence before public international tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, E. L., ‘Seabed mining and law of the sea’, Department of State Bulletin 80 (December 1980), 60–64.Google Scholar

Roach, J. A., Excessive maritime claims, 4th ed. (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roach, J. A., and Smith, R. W., Excessive maritime claims (Newport, RI: Naval War College, 1994).Google Scholar

Robertson, H. B., ‘Navigation in the exclusive economic zone’, Virginia Journal of International Law 24 (1984), 865–916.Google Scholar

Rothwell, D. R., ‘International straits’, in Rothwell, D. R. et al. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 114–133.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Y., The international law of the sea, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thurstan, R., et al., ‘Origins of the bottom trawling controversy in the British Isles: 19th century witness testimonies reveal evidence of early fishery declines’, Fish and Fisheries 15 (2014), 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolentino, A. M., The Philippines and the law of the sea: a collection of articles, statements, and speeches (Manila: Secretariat to the Cabinet Committee on the Law of the Sea Treaty by the Development Academy of the Philippines Press, c. 1982).Google Scholar

Tolentino, A. M., ‘Proceedings of the Philippines Senate on Bill No. 541’, in Lotilla, R. P. M. (ed.), The Philippine national territory: a collection of related documents (Manila: Institute of International Legal Studies, Foreign Service Institute, c. 1995).Google Scholar

Treves, T., ‘Military installations, structures, and devices on the seabed’, American Journal of International Law 74 (1980), 808–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsipis, K., ‘Antisubmarine warfare’, in Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (ed.), World armaments and disarmament, SIPRI yearbook 1974 (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1974), pp. 303–325.Google Scholar

United States Department of the Navy, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Strategic concepts of the U.S. Navy, NWP 1 (A) (Washington, DC: Naval Warfare Publications, 1987).Google Scholar

‘US explains its votes on seabed resolutions’, Department of State Bulletin 62 (26 January 1970), 89–95.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, J. M., ‘Transit passage through international straits’, in Chircop, A., McDorman, T. and Rolston, S. (eds.), The future of ocean regime-building: essays in tribute to Douglas M. Johnston (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), pp. 177–232.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, J. M., and Yuen, C., ‘Common heritage v. freedom of the seas: which governs the seabed?’, San Diego Law Review 19 (1982), 493–551.Google Scholar

Vicuña, F. O., ‘National laws on seabed exploitation: problems of international law’, University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 13 (1981), 139–156.Google Scholar

Visscher, C. de, and Corbett, P. E. (trans.), Theory and reality in public international law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Waldock, C. H. M., ‘The Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case’, British Year Book of International Law 28 (1951), 114–171.Google Scholar

Wani, I. J., ‘An evaluation of the convention on the law of the sea from the perspective of the landlocked states’, Virginia Journal of International Law 22 (1982), 627–666.Google Scholar

Warioba, J. S., ‘The reform of the United Nations system in the context of the law of the sea and the United Nations conference on the environment and development’, African Journal of International and Comparative Law 7 (1995), 426–444.Google Scholar

Wertenbaker, W., ‘A reporter at large: the law of the sea – I’, New Yorker (1 August 1983), 38–65.Google Scholar

Wertenbaker, W., ‘A reporter at large: the law of the sea – II’, New Yorker (8 August 1983), 56–82.Google Scholar

Whitaker, J. S., ‘Outside the mainstream’, The Atlantic (October 1982), 18–26.Google Scholar

Wilberforce, R. O., ‘Some aspects of the Anglo-Norwegian fisheries case’, Transactions of the Grotius Society 38 (1952), 151–168.Google Scholar

Wilkes, O., ‘Strategic anti-submarine warfare and its implications for a counterforce first strike’, in Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (ed.), World armaments and disarmament, SIPRI yearbook 1979 (London: Taylor & Francis, 1979), pp. 427–452.Google Scholar

World Bank, Price prospects for major primary commodities, vol. 4 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1984).Google Scholar

Young, E., ‘New laws for old navies’, Survival 16 (1974), 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yturriaga, J. A. de, Straits used for international navigation: a Spanish perspective (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zedalis, R. J., ‘Peaceful purposes and other relevant provisions of the revised composite negotiating text: a comparative analysis of the existing and the proposed military regime of the high seas’, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 7 (1979), 1–36.Google Scholar