Aceto, Michael. 2003. What are Creole languages? An alternative approach to the anglophone Atlantic world with special emphasis on Barbudan Creole English. In Aceto, Michael & Williams, Jeffrey (eds.), Contact Englishes of the Eastern Caribbean, 121–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1), 38–59.Google Scholar

Ahlers, Wiebke & Meer, Philipp. 2019. Sibilant variation in New Englishes: A comparative sociophonetic study of Trinidadian and American English /s(tr)/-retraction. INTERSPEECH, 291–295. doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auer, Peter, Barden, Birgit, & Grosskopf, Beate. 1998. Subjective and objective parameters determining “salience” in long‐term dialect accommodation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(2), 163–187.Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald, Davidson, Douglas, & Bates, Douglas. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 390–412.Google Scholar

Bailey, Guy. 2008. Real and apparent time. In Chambers, Jack & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 312–332. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baker, Adam, Archangeli, Diana, & Mielke, Jeff. 2011. Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem. Language Variation and Change 23(3), 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhael M. 1981. The Diologic Imagination, eds. Emerson, C. & Holquist, M.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Barr, Dale, Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph, & Tily, Harry J.. 2014. Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3), 1–43.Google Scholar

Barth, Danielle & Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2018. Evaluation logistic mixed effects models of corpus linguistic data in light of lexical diffusion. In Speelman, Dirk, Heylen, Kris, & Geeraerts, Dirk (eds.), Mixed Effects Regression Models in Linguistics, 254–303. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Kliegl, Reinhold, Vasishth, Shravan, & Baayen, Harald. 2018. Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv:1506.04967.Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2014. English phonotactics. English Language and Linguistics 19(3), 437–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxter, Gareth & Croft, William. 2016. Modeling language change across the lifespan: Individual trajectories in community change. Language Variation and Change 28(2), 129–173.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert. 1994. Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English. Language Variation and Change 6(3), 303–326.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert. 2018. The quantitative paradigm. In Chambers, Jack & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd ed., 85–107. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Becker, Kara. 2009. /r/ and the construction of place identity on New York City’s Lower East Side. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(5), 634–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Kara & Coggshall, Elizabeth L.. 2009. The sociolinguistics of ethnicity in New York City. Linguistics and Language Compass 3(3), 751–766.Google Scholar

Beebe, Leslie M. & Giles, Howard. 1984. Speech-accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46, 5–32.Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2), 145.Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 2001. Back in style. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Benor, Sarah B. 2010. Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(2), 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, Basil. 1962. Social class, linguistic codes and grammatical elements. Language and Speech 5(4), 221–240.Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette. 2006a. Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette. 2006b. A theoretical synopsis of evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32(2), 117–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1984. Language, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Blumstein, Sheila E. 1989. Theoretical implications of the quantal nature of speech: A commentary. Journal of Phonetics 17(1–2), 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boersma, Paul & Hamann, Silke. 2008. The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25(2), 217–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16(6), 645–668.Google Scholar

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica. doi: 10.1159/000261913.Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1994. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, Marc & New, Boris. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4), 977–990.Google Scholar

Burnett, Heather, Koopman, Hilda, & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2018. Structural explanations in syntactic variation: The evolution of English negative and polarity indefinites. Language Variation and Change 30(1), 83–107.Google Scholar

Burnham, Kenneth P., Anderson, David R., & Huyvaert, Kathryn P.. 2011. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: Some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65(1), 23–35.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14(May), 261–290.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2017. Grammatical and lexical factors in sound change: A usage-based approach. Language Variation and Change 29(3), 273–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callahan, Erin. 2017. Interlanguage and cross-generational assimilation: Past tense unmarking in hispanicized English. Journal of English Linguistics 45(2), 103–129.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. Sociolinguistics and perception. Linguistics and Language Compass 4(6), 377–389.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack. 1996. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack. 2002. Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 3–14. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chen, Matthew Y. & S.-Y. Wang, William. 1975. Sound change: Actuation and implementation. Language 51(2), 255–281.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 2008. Sex and gender in variationist research. In Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 423–443. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

City of Austin. 2017. Census. www.austintexas.gov/.Google Scholar

City of Austin. 2019. Demographics. https://austintexas.gov/demographics.Google Scholar

Clements, George N. 1975. Vowel Harmony in Nonlinear Generative Phonology: An Autosegmental Model. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Clyne, Michael. 2000. Lingua franca and ethnolects in Europe and beyond. Sociolinguistica 14(1), 83–89.Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1986. Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Sex Differences in Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Coleman, John. 1998. Cognitive reality and the phonological lexicon: A review. Journal of Neurolinguistics 11(3), 295–320.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 1980. Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Age in social and sociolinguistic theory. In Coupland, Nikolas, Sarangi, Srikant, & Candlin, Christopher N. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Social Theory, 185–211. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2014. Language change, social change, sociolinguistic change: A meta commentary. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2), 277–286.Google Scholar

Currie, Haver C. 1952. A projection of socio‐linguistics: The relationship of speech to social status. The Southern Speech Journal 18(1), 23–37.Google Scholar

Dart, Sarah N. 1991. Articulatory and Acoustic Properties of Laminal Articulations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 1975. A phonological analysis of English sp, st, sk with special reference to speech error evidence. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 5(1), 3–25.Google Scholar

De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1978. Course in General Linguistics. Eds. Bally, Charles & Baskin, Wade. Glasgow: Fontana.Google Scholar

Deuchar, Margaret. 1988. A pragmatic account of women’s use of standard speech. In Coates, Jennifer & Cameron, Deborah (eds.), Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, 27–32. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Di Paolo, Marianna & Yaeger-Dror., Malcah 2011. Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dillard, Joey L. 1972. Black English: Its History and Usage in the United States. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Dresher, B. Elan. 2011. The phoneme. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 241–266. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Durian, David. 2007. Getting [(esh)]tronger every day?: More on urbanization and the socio-geographic diffusion of (str) in Columbus, OH. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2), 64–79.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 151–169. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2001. Style and social meaning. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 119–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008a. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2), 25–42.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008b. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–476.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2013. Research ethics in linguistics. In Podesva, Robert & Sharma, Devyani (eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics, 11–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 461–490.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edgell, Stephen. 1993. Class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Erker, Daniel & Guy, Gregory R.. 2012. The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variable subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language 88(3), 526–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fant, Gunnar. 1971. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Farnetani, Edda & Recasens, Daniel. 2010. Coarticulation and connected speech processes. In Hardcastle, William, Laver, John, & Gibbon, Fiona E (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed., 316–352. Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Farrington, Charles Ryan. 2019. Language variation and the Great Migration: Regionality and African American language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph W. 1990a. The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph W. 1990b. Tense marking in Black English. WORD 41(2), 203–218.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph W., Labov, William, Vaughn-Cooke, Fay Boyd, Bailey, Guy, Wolfram, Walt, Spears, Arthur K., & Rickford, John. 1987. Are Black and White vernaculars diverging? American Speech 62(1), 3–80.Google Scholar

Forrest, Karen, Weismer, Gary, Milenkovic, Paul, & Dougall, Ronald L.. 1988. Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84(1), 115–123.Google Scholar

Fought, Carmen. 1997. The English and Spanish of young adult Chicanos. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Fought, Carmen. 2007. Ethnicity. In Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 444–472. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fought, Carmen. 2010. Language as a representation of Mexican American identity. English Today 26(3), 44–48.Google Scholar

Fridland, Valerie, Bartlett, Kathryn, & Kreuz, Roger. 2004. Do you hear what I hear? Experimental measurement of the perceptual salience of acoustically manipulated vowel variants by Southern speakers in Memphis, TN. Language Variation and Change 16(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Fruehwald, Josef. 2016. The early influence of phonology on a phonetic change. Language 92(2), 376–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fruehwald, Josef. 2017. Generations, lifespans, and the zeitgeist. Language Variation and Change 29(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

García, Maryellen. 1984. Parameters of the East Los Angeles speech community. In Ornstein-Galacia, Jacob and Metcalf, Allan (eds.), Form and Function in Chicano English, 85–98. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar

Garrett, Andrew. 2015. Sound change. In Bowern, Claire & Evans, Bethwyn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 227–248. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goldinger, Stephen. 1996. Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 22(5), 1166–1183.Google Scholar

Gordon, Elizabeth. 1997. Sex, speech, and stereotypes: Why women use prestige speech forms more than men. Language in Society 26(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 2011. Variability. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1–24. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gylfadottir, Duna. 2015. Shtreets of Philadelphia: An acoustic study of /str /-retraction in a naturalistic speech corpus. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2), 89–97.Google Scholar

Hale, Mark. 2008. Neogrammarian sound change. In Joseph, Brian & Janda, Richard (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 343–368. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris, Vaux, Bert, & Wolf, Andrew. 2000. On feature spreading and the representation of place of articulation. Linguistic Inquiry 31(3), 387–444.Google Scholar

Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2001. Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony: Genes and development. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hardcastle, William. 1985. Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual coarticulation during /kl/ sequences. Speech Communication 4(1), 247–263.Google Scholar

Harrington, Jonathan. 2010. Acoustic phonetics. In Harcastle, William J., Laver, John, & Gibbon, Fiona E (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 81–129. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harrington, Jonathan, Kleber, Felicitas, & Reubold, Ulrich. 2008. Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5), 2825–2835.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer. 2018. Sociophonetics: The role of words, the role of context, and the role of words in context. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(4), 696–706.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer & Foulkes, Paul. 2016. The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language 92(2), 298–330.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond. 2000. Salience, stigma and standard. In Wright, Laura (ed.), The Development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, 57–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hinrichs, Lars, Bergs, Alexander, Bohmann, Axel, Brozovsky, Erika, Hodge, Brian, Meemann, Kirsten, & Schultz, Patrick. 2015. Sibilants and ethnic diversity: A sociophonetic study of palatalized /s/ in STR-clusters among Hispanic, White, and African-American speakers of Texas English. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 44: Intersections, October 22–25, Toronto.Google Scholar

Hlavac, Marek. 2018. stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. Social Policy Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia. R package version 5.2.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer.Google Scholar

Holliday, Nicole R. 2016. Identity performance among Black/biracial men through intonation: Examining pitch accents and peak delay. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(2), 71–80.Google Scholar

Holmes-Elliott, Sophie & Levon, Erez. 2017. The substance of style: Gender, social class and interactional stance in /s/-fronting in southeast England. Journal of Sociolinguistics 55(5), 1045–1072.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1998. Response to Koenraad Kuiper. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(1), 104–106.Google Scholar

Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt, Strobl, Carolin, & Zeileis, Achim. 2017. Party: A Laboratory for Recursive Partytioning. R package version 1.2–3.Google Scholar

International Phonetic Association (IPA). 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. Florian & Weatherholtz, Kodi. 2016. What the heck is salience? How predictive language processing contributes to sociolinguistic perception. Frontiers in Psychology 7(August), 1–5.Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Janda, Richard D. & Joseph, Brian D.. 2003. Reconsidering the canons of sound-change: Towards a “big bang” theory. In Blake, Barry, Burridge, Kate, and Taylor, Jo (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 205–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Johnson, Keith & Mullennix, John W. (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing, 145–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

James, Deborah & Drakich, Janice. (1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction, 281–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith. 2003. Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith. 2005. Decisions and Mechanisms in Exemplar-Based Phonology. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7m49b843.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2016. Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking. Linguistics and Language Compass 10(11), 632–643.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara, Andrus, Jennifer, & Danielson, Andrew E.. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.” Journal of English Linguistics 34(2), 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jongman, Allard, Wayland, Ratree, & Wong, Serena. 2000. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(3), 1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kerr, Beverly. 2018. High tech industry. Austin Chamber, June 5. www.austinchamber.com/blog/06-05-2018-high-tech-industry.Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8(2), 177–202.Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann. 2002. “Salience” as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. In Jones, Mari & Esch, Edith (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors, 81–110. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott. 2009. Style as stance. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 45–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kohn, Mary Elizabeth & Franz, Hannah Askin. 2009. Localized patterns for global variants: The case of quotative systems of African American and Latino speakers. American Speech 84(3), 259–297.Google Scholar

Kuha, Jouni. 2004. AIC and BIC: Comparisons of assumptions and performance. Sociological Methods and Research 33(2), 188–229.Google Scholar

Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per B., & Christensen, Rune H. B.. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). DOI:10.18637/jss.v082.i13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. WORD 19(3), 273–309.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1981a. Field Methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation. Sociolinguistic Working Paper Number R1. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1981b. Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language 57(2), 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William. 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, John (ed.), Language in Use, 28–53. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social factors in the course of language change. Language Variation and Change 2(2), 205–254.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The South. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change, 240–262. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Labov, William, Rosenfelder, Ingrid, & Fruehwald, Josef. 2013. One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89(1), 30–65.Google Scholar

Ladd, Dwight Robert. 2014. Phonetics in phonology. In Goldsmith, John A., Riggle, Jason, & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 348–373. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A Course in Phonetics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishing.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 2006. Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to the Sounds of Languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages, 9th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lavie, Rene-Joseph. 2007. Exemplar theory in linguistics: A perspective for the cognitive subject. Communication to the 11th Congress of Cognitive Linguistics, 1–21. HAL Id: halshs-00142394.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Wayne P. 2000. /str/ -> /Str/: Assimilation at a distance? American Speech 75(1), 82–86.Google Scholar

Le Page, Robert & Andrée, Tabouret-Keller. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liljencrants, Johan & Lindblom, Björn. 2011. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Linguistic Society of America 48(4), 839–862.Google Scholar

Lindblom, Björn. 1986. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In Ohala, John & Jaeger, Jeri (eds.), Experimental Phonology, 13–44. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 403–440. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Luce, Paul A. & Pisoni, David. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing 19(1), 1–36.Google Scholar

Luke, Steven G. 2017. Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods 49(4), 1494–1502.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1887. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. 2007. Consonant harmony via correspondence: Evidence from Chumash. Papers in Optimality Theory 3(January), 223–237.Google Scholar

Mielke, Jeff, Baker, Adam & Archangeli, Diana. 2010. Variability and homogeneity in American English /r/ allophony and /s/ retraction. Laboratory Phonology 10, 699–730.Google Scholar

Mielke, Jeff. 2008. The Emergence of Distinctive Features. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mielke, Jeff & Hume, Elizabeth. 2006. Distinctive features. In Keil, Frank & Wilson, Robert (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, 723–731. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1993. Mechanisms of change in urban dialects: The role of class, social network and gender. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(1), 57–77.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko. 2015. The emergence of African American English: Monogenetic or polygenetic? With or without “Decreolization”? Under how much substrate influence? In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 57–84. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Müller, Samuel, Scealy, Janice, & Welsh, Alan. 2013. Model selection in linear mixed models. Statistical Science 28(2), 135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakagawa, Shinichi, Johnson, Paul C. D., & Schielzeth, Holger. 2017. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 14(134), 1–11.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, Shinichi & Schielzeth, Holger. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(2), 133–142.Google Scholar

Bailey, George, Nichols, Stephen, Turton, Danielle, & Baranowski, Maciej. 2022. Affrication as the cause of /s/-retraction: Evidence from Manchester English. GLOSSA: A Journal of General Linguistics 7(1). doi: 10.16995/glossa.8026.Google Scholar

Nolan, Francis, Holst, Tara, & Barbara, Kühnert. 1996. Modelling [s] to [∫] accommodation in English. Journal of Phonetics 24(1), 113–137.Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1993a. Coarticulation and phonology. Language and Speech 36(2), 155–170.Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1993b. The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems & Perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. & Solé, Maria-Josep. 2008. Turbulence and Phonology. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. e-ISSN: 2768-5047.Google Scholar

Olive, Joseph, Greenwood, Alice, & Coleman, John. 1993. Acoustics of American English Speech. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Phillips, Jacob, B. 2016. Phonological and prosodic conditioning of /s/-retraction in American English. Paper presented at Higher Order Structure in Speech Variability, LabPhon15 satellite workshop, Ithaca, NY, 1–2.Google Scholar

Phillips, Jacob B. & Resnick, Paige. 2019. Masculine toughness and the categorical perception of onset sibilant clusters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145(6). doi: 10.1121/1.5113566.Google Scholar

Phillips, Jacob B. 2018. Temporal dynamics of /s/-retraction in American English. Preprint submitted to Journal of Phonetics.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII, 101–140. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. 2006. How English became African American English. In van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou (eds.), The Handbook of the History of English, 452–476. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana & Tagliamonte, Sali. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pouplier, Marianne. 2012. The gaits of speech: Re-examining the role of articulatory effort in spoken language. In Solé, Maria-Josep & Recasens, Daniel (eds.), The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production and Social Factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Purnell, Thomas C. 2010. Phonetic detail in the perception of ethnic varieties of US English. In Prestion, Dennis & Niedzielski, Nancy (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics, 289–326. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Purnell, Thomas, Idsardi, William & Baugh, John. 1999. Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(10), 10–30.Google Scholar

Core Team, R. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar

Rácz, Péter. 2012. Operationalising salience: Definite article reduction in the north of England. English Language and Linguistics 16(1), 57–79.Google Scholar

Rácz, Péter. 2013. Salience in Sociolinguistics: A Quantitative Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rankin, Robert L. 2008. The comparative method. In Joseph, Brian & Janda, Richard (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 181–212. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Reetz, Henning & Jongman, Allard. 2009. Phonetics: Transcription, Production, Acoustics, and Perception. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rickford, John & McNair-Knox, Faye. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward (eds.), Perspectives on Register Variation within Sociolinguistics, 235–276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rickford, John & Price, MacKenzie. 2013. Girlz II women: Age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2), 143–179.Google Scholar

Rickford, John R. 2015. The Creole origins hypothesis. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 35–56. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Riley, Matilda White. 1971. Social gerontology and the age stratification of society. The Gerontologist 11(1), 79–87.Google Scholar

Robinson, Ryan. 2016. Top ten demographic trends in Austin, Texas. https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Top-Trends/bbi9-bw4t/.Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne. 1995. Bilingualism, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rose, Sharon. 2011. Long-distance assimilation of consonants. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1811–1837. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rose, Sharon & Walker, Rachel. 2011. Harmony systems. In Riggle, Jason, Goldsmith, John A., & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd ed., 240–290. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rutter, Ben. 2011. Acoustic analysis of a sound change in progress: The consonant cluster /stɹ/ in English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(1), 27–40.Google Scholar

Rutter, Ben. 2014. The acquisition of newly emerging sociophonetic variation: /str-/ in American English. Journal of Child Language 41(5), 1166–1178.Google Scholar

Sanchez, Rosaura. (1983). Chicano Discourse: Socio-Historical Perspectives. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David & Laberge, Suzanne. 1978. The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods, 239–250. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. 2005. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In Ammon, Ulrich, Dittmar, Norbert, Mattheier, Klaus J., and Trudgill, Peter (eds.), Volume 2: Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, 1003–1013. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. 2006a. Age: Apparent time and real time. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., 110–116. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. 2006b. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In Peter Trudgill, Jack Chambers & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 638–668. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Santa Ana, Otto. 1993. Chicano English and the nature of the Chicano language setting. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 15(1), 3–35.Google Scholar

Santa Ana, Otto. 1996. Sonority and syllable structure in Chicano English. Language Variation and Change 8(1), 63–69.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1925. Sound patterns in language. Language 1(2), 37–51.Google Scholar

Scudieri, Kirsten. 2012. On the perception of /s/ and /ʃ/: Considering the effects of phonotactics. Master’s thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Semon, Richard. 1923. Mnemic Psychology. Ed. Duffy, Bella. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Shadle, Christine H., Proctor, Michael I., & Iskarous, Khalil. 2009. Revisiting the role of the sublingual cavity in the /s/‐/∫/ distinction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(4), 2569–2569.Google Scholar

Shadle, Christine H. & Scully, Celia. 1995. An articulatory-acoustic-aerodynamic analysisof [s] in VCV sequences. Journal of Phonetics 23(1–2), 53–66.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Michael. 1995. A case of distant assimilation: /str/ → /ʃtr/. American Speech 70(1), 101–107.Google Scholar

Shaw, Patricia. 1991. Consonant harmony systems: The special status of coronal harmony. In Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-Francois (eds.), The Special Status of Coronals: Internal and External Evidence, 125–157. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23(3–4), 193–229.Google Scholar

Solé, Maria Josep. 1992. Phonetic and phonological processes: The case of nasalization. Language and Speech 35(1), 29–43.Google Scholar

Stauffer, Howard B. 2007. Contemporary Baysian and Frequentist Statistical Research Methods for Natural Research Scientists. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Stevens, Kenneth & Hanson, Helen M.. 2010. Articulatory: Acoustic Relations as the Basis of Distinctive Contrasts. In Hardcastle John Laver, William J. & Gibbon, Fiona E. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed., 424–453. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stevens, Kenneth. 1998. Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stevens, Mary & Harrington, Jonathan. 2016. The phonetic origins of /s/-retraction: Acoustic and perceptual evidence from Australian English. Journal of Phonetics 58, 118–134.Google Scholar

Stewart, William A. 1967. Sociolinguistic factors in the history of American Negro dialects. The Florida FL Reporter 5(2), 11, 22, 24, 26, 30.Google Scholar

Strand, Elizabeth A. 1999. Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1), 86–100.Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane, Sonderegger, Morgan, Macdonald, Rachel, & Mcauliffe, Michael. 2018. Cross-dialectal variation in /s/-retraction in English. BAAP Colloquium, April 12–14, Canterbury.Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane, Sonderegger, Morgan, Mcauliffe, Michael, & Macdonald, Rachel. 2018. Dialectal and social factors affect the phonetic bases of English /s/-retraction. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 47, October 18–21, New York.Google Scholar

Tabain, Marija. 2001. Variability in fricative production and spectra: Implications for the hyper- and hypo-. Language and Speech 44(1), 54–94.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali & Baayen, Rolf Harald. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24, 135–178.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali & Alexandra, D’Arcy. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1), 58–108.Google Scholar

Tamminga, Meredith. 2014. Sound change without frequency effects: Ramifications for phonological theory. In Santana-LaBarge, Robert E. (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 457–465. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

The X Factor UK. 2014. Maria Ellinas sings Randy Crawford’s Street Life – Audition Week 2 – The X Factor UK 2014. YouTube, September 6. https://youtu.be/NnbggCljAhk.Google Scholar

Thomas, Erik R. 2016. Sociophonetics of consonantal variation. Annual Review of Linguistics 2, 95–113.Google Scholar

Thomas, Erik R. & Ericson, Holly. 2007. Intonational distinctiveness of Mexican American English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2), 1–15.Google Scholar

Thomas, Erik R., Lass, Norman J., & Carpenter, Jeannine. 2010. Identification of African American Speech. In Preston, Dennis & Niedielski, Nancy (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics, 265–285. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah & Kaufman, Terrence. 1991. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2), 179–195.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sociolinguistics. Penguin: London.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2006. Linguistic and social typology. In Trudgill, Peter, Chambers, Jack, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 707–728. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Twaddell, William Freeman. 1935. On defining the phoneme. Language 11(1), 5–62.Google Scholar

Välimaa-Blum, Riitta. 2009. Phonotactic constraints in cognitive phonology. Corela 7(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Van Herk, Gerard. 2015. The English origins hypothesis. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 23–34. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Benji., Wald 1984. The status of Chicano English as a dialect of American English. In Ornstein-Galacia, Jacob and Metcalf, Allan (eds.), Form and Function in Chicano English, 14–31. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar

Wang, William & Cheng, Chin-Chuan. 1977. Implementation of phonological change: The Shuāng-fēng Chinese case. In Wang, William S. (ed.), The Lexicon in Phonological Change, 148–158. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winfred & Malkiel, Yakow (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics,95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Whinnom, Keith. 1971. Linguistic hybridization and the “special case” of pidgins and creoles. In Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, 91–116. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wickham, Hadley. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Wilbanks, Eric. 2017. Social and structural constraints on a phonetically motivated change in progress: (str) retraction in Raleigh, NC. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 23(1), 301–310.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert L. 1997. The Ebonics controversy. Journal of Black Psychology 23(3), 208–214.Google Scholar

Winford, Donald. 2015. The origins of African American vernacular English: Beginnings. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language, 85–104. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. 1974. The relationship of White Southern speech to vernacular Black English. Linguistic Society of America 50(3), 498–527.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. 1989. Structural variability in phonological development: Final nasals in vernacular Black English. In Fasold, Ralph W. & Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Language Variation and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. 2013. The contact dynamics of socioethnic varieties in North America. In Schreier, Daniel & Hundt, Marianne (eds.), English as a Contact Language,106–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt & Schilling, Natalie. 2016. American English: Dialects and Variation, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt & Thomas, Erik R.. 2002. The Development of African American English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wood, Sidney A. J. 1996. Assimilation or coarticulation? Evidence from the temporal co-ordination of tongue gestures for the palatalization of Bulgarian alveolar stops. Journal of Phonetics 24(1), 139–164.Google Scholar

Yu, Alan C. L. 2013. Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zelinsky, Willbur. 2001. The Enigma of Ethnicity: Another American Dilemma. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar

Zipf, George K. 1936. The Psychobiology of Language. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar