Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:05:11.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Escaping the minimalist trap: design and implementation of large-scale biodiversity corridors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Kevin R. Crooks
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
M. Sanjayan
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Virginia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Our natural world is on the verge of a profound loss of biological diversity (Crooks and Sanjayan Chapter 1). Although the economic, cultural, and spiritual costs of this ecological impoverishment are enormous and irreversible, from a human point of view extinction's denouement appears to be “slow-motion.” This slow-motion results in a limited recognition of its urgency and the very little time we have to prevent it from occurring. As evident in this volume, the threats cut across multiple scales of ecological organization, from genes and species all the way to ecological processes. To face this complex challenge, action plans to avoid extinction must become more comprehensive, including strategies to preserve both areas and ecological and evolutionary processes, as well as those targeted to avoid the foreseeable extinction of particular threatened species.

One comprehensive regional-scale approach with great promise for effective conservation is based on the concept of “biodiversity conservation corridors,” a large-scale planning region where actions are taken to integrate representation and viability of species, ecosystems, and ecological and evolutionary processes in a scenario of explicitly defined human needs. The biodiversity conservation corridor approach shifts focus from a local to a regional scale, and represents an ambitious attempt to make protected area networks that are sufficient for species survival besides promoting an optimum allocation of resources to conserve biodiversity at the least economic cost to society (Salwasser et al. 1987).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayres, J. M., Fonseca, G. A. B., Rylands, A. B., et al. 1997. Abordagens Inovadoras para Conservação da Biodiversidade do Brasil: Os Corredores Ecológicos das Florestas Neotropicais do Brasil – Versão 3.0, Programa Piloto para a Proteção das Florestas Neotropicais, Projeto Parques e Reservas. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Recursos Hídricos e da Amazônia Legal (MMA), Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recusos Naturais Renováveis (Ibama).Google Scholar
Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E., Rice, R. E., and Fonseca, G. A. B.. 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CABS and IESB. 2000. Designing Sustainable Landscapes. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Biodiversity Science (CABS), Conservation International, and Ilhéus, BA, Brazil: Instituto de Estudos Sócio-Ambientais do Sul da Bahia (IESB).Google Scholar
Chomitz, K. M., and Gray, D. A.. 1996. Roads, land use and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize. World Bank Economic Review 10:487–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. C., and Klein, R. W.. 1995. Incentive payments to encourage farmer adoption of water quality protection practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. M. 1975. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeography studies for the design of natural reserves. Biological Conservation 7:129–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. M. 1976. Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations. Science 193:1027–1029CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunning, J. B., Borgella, R., Clements, K., and Meffe, G. K.. 1995. Patch isolation, corridor effects, and colonization by a resident sparrow in a managed pine woodland. Conservation Biology 9:542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrig, L., and Merriam, G.. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66:1762–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrig, L., and Merriam, G.. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conservation Biology 8:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, P. J., and Simpson, R. D.. 2001. Cost-effective conservation: a review of what works to preserve biodiversity. Resources for the Future 143:17–20Google Scholar
Fonseca, G. A. B., da, Ayres, J. M., Rylands, A. B., et al. 1998. A new vision for the conservation of biological diversity of Brazilian Rainforest: The ecological corridors concept – version 3.0, Projeto Parques e Reservas PPR-PP/G7. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.Google Scholar
Galindo-Leal, C., and Bunnell, F.. 1995. Ecosystem management: implications and opportunities of a new paradigm. Forestry Chronicle 71:601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascon, C., Williamson, G. B., and Fonseca, G. A. B.. 2000. Receding forest edges and vanishing reserves. Science 288:1356–1358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gemmill, B. 2002. Managing Agricultural Resources for Biodiversity Conservation: A Guide to Best Practices. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP/UNDP Environment Liaison Centre International.Google Scholar
Groves, C. R. 2003. Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner's Guide to Regional Planning for Biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Groves, C., Jensen, D. B., Valutis, L. L., et al. 2002. Planning for biodiversity conservation: putting conservation science into practice. BioScience 52: 499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, C. A. 1995. Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 9:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, L., Midgley, G. L., Lovejoy, T., et al. 2002. Conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. Conservation Biology 16:264–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. D., and Scheck, J.. 1991. From implications to applications: the dispersal corridor principle applied to the conservation of biological diversity. Pp. 189–220 in Saunders, D. A., and Hobbs, R. J. (eds.) Nature Conservation, vol. 2, The Role of Corridors. Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia: Surrey Beatty and Sons.Google Scholar
Hilton-Taylor, C. 2002. 2002 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available online at http://www.redlist.orgGoogle Scholar
IUCN. 1998. Biosphere Reserves: Myth or Reality? Proceedings of a Workshop at the 1996 IUCN World Conservation Congress, Montreal, Canada. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Knutson, K. L., and Naef, V. L.. 1997. Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitats: Riparian. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.Google Scholar
Levin S. A. (ed.) 2000. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. New York: Academic Press.
MacArthur, R. H., and Wilson, E. O.. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mahar, D., and Ducrot, C. E. H.. 1998. Land-Use Zoning on Brazil's Tropical Frontier: Emerging Lessions from the Brazilian Amazon, Economic Development Institute Case Study 19674. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Margules, C. R., and Pressey, R. L.. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243–253CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, P. H., F. Veiga Neto, V. Denardin, and W. Loureiro. 2002. Using fiscal instruments to encourage conservation: municipal responses to the “ecological” value-added tax in Paraná and Minas Gerais, Brazil. Pp. 173–200 in Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., and Landell-Mills, N. (eds.) Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Robles, P., et al. 2002. Wilderness: Earth's Last Wild Places. Mexico City: CEMEX, S.A.Google Scholar
Murcia, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:58–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J.. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newmark, W. D. 1985. Legal and biotic boundaries of western North American national parks: a problem of congruence. Biological Conservation 33:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, W. D. 1995. Extinction of mammal populations in western North American National Parks. Conservation Biology 9:512–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, R. 2002. Context matters: considerations for large-scale conservation. Conservation Biology in Practice 3:3.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1999. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2:493–535CrossRef
Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulliam, H. R., and Danielson, B. J.. 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. American Naturalist 137:S50–S66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redford, K. H., and Fonseca, G. A. B.. 1986. The role of gallery forests in the zoogeography of the Cerrado's non-volant mammalian fauna. Biotropica 18: 126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, D. K., Noon, B. R., and Meslow, E. C.. 1997. Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy. BioScience 47:677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salwasser, H., Schönewald-Cox, C., and Baker, R.. 1987. The role of interagency cooperation in managing for viable populations. Pp. 159–173 in Soulé, M. (ed.) Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sanderson, J. G., and Harris, L. D. (eds.) 1998. Landscape Ecology. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. D., and Sedjo, R. A.. 1996. Paying for the conservation of endangered ecosystems: a comparison of direct and indirect approaches. Environment and Development Economics 1:241–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M. E., and J. Terborgh (eds.) 1999. Continental Conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Tendler, J. 1998. Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, L. T., Casagrande, R. A., Blossey, B., Schwarzlaender, M., and Haefliger, P.. 2002. Potential for biological control of Phragmites australis in North America. Biological Control 23:191–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2003. Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World: Transforming Institutions, Growth, and Quality of Life. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Wu, J. J., and Babcock, B. A.. 1996. Contract design for the purpose of environmental goods from agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78:935–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavaleta, E. S., Hobbs, R. J., and Mooney, H. A.. 2001. Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×