Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:47:58.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Peace research and conservation conflicts

from PART II - Contrasting disciplinary approaches to the study of conflict in conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Paul Rogers
Affiliation:
Bradford University
Stephen M. Redpath
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
R. J. Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Kevin A. Wood
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Juliette C. Young
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Get access

Summary

I here outline the development of peace research as an area of study, analyse its current approach as an interdisciplinary field of work and discuss whether approaches prevalent within peace research are of value in relation to the resolution of conservation conflicts. Peace research is a discipline which endeavours to analyse and understand the roots and structures of conflicts, to prevent them before they develop, resolve them when they have commenced and engage in post-conflict peace-building.

Historical context

Prior to the Second World War, pioneering researchers studying the causes of interstate wars included Quincy Wright, Pitrim Sorokin and Lewis Fry Richardson. Their work attracted little attention until the early post-war period when peace research was boosted by the failure of conventional international politics to prevent two massive world wars in the space of 30 years, and it was further boosted by the advent of the nuclear arms race and the risk of a global nuclear catastrophe.

By the mid-1950s, peace research centres were being established principally in Scandinavia and North America, but with a persistent interest in Japan. A notable initiative was the establishment in 1957 of the Journal of Conflict Resolution, based at the Centre for Conflict Resolution at the University of Michigan, with the founding editors presenting two reasons for the need for such a journal:

The first is that by far the most important practical problem facing the human race today is that of international relations – specifically the prevention of global war. The second is that if intellectual progress is to be made in this area, the study of international relations must be made an interdisciplinary enterprise, drawing its discourse from all the social sciences and even further. (Boulding, 1973: 3)

The interdisciplinary call was reflected in the backgrounds of North American peace researchers including the mathematician Anatol Rapoport, the economist Kenneth Boulding, the sociologist Elise Boulding and the psychologist Herb Kelman.

Type
Chapter
Information
Conflicts in Conservation
Navigating Towards Solutions
, pp. 168 - 179
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, C., Rogers, P. and Sloboda, J. (2006). Global Responses to Global Threats: Sustainable Security for the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford Research Group.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. (1973). Editorial. J. Conflict Resolut., 1, 3.Google Scholar
, Bradford. (2011). Peace Research at Bradford, Annual Report 2010. Bradford: University of Bradford.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Sandstrom, S., Shorrocks, A. and Wollf, E. N. (2006). The world distribution of household wealth. In WIDER Angle, No 2. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace and peace research. J. Peace Res., 6, 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, A. (2013). Unprecedented climate extremes marked last decade, says UN. Guardian Environment Network, 3 July.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrands, W. H. III. (1972). Limits to Growth. London: Earth Island.Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T. and Miall, H. (2011). Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Rogers, P. (2013). Peace studies. In Contemporary Security Studies, ed. Collins, A., pp. 54–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, P. and Ramsbotham, O. (1999). Then and now: peace research – past and future. Polit. Stud., 47, 740–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×