Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:18:54.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2021

Janna Wessels
Janna Wessels
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Concealment Controversy
Sexual Orientation, Discretion Reasoning and the Scope of Refugee Protection
 , pp. 275 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5 (European Convention of Human Rights, ECHR).Google Scholar
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 26 October 2012, 2012/C 326/02 (EU Charter).Google Scholar
Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts of 2 October 1997, oj C 340, 10 November 1997 (entry into force 1 May 1999).Google Scholar
Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, oj C 306, 17 December 2007 (entry into force 1 December 2009).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, oj L 31/18, 6 February 2003 (2003 Reception Conditions Directive).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, oj L 304/12, 30 September 2004 (2004 Qualification Directive).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status, oj L 326/13, 13 December 2005 (2005 Asylum Procedures Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast), oj L 337/9, 20 December 2011 (Recast Qualification Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast), oj L 180/160, 29 June 2013 (Recast Asylum Procedures Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast), oj L 1980/96, 29 June 2013 (Recast Reception Conditions Directive).Google Scholar
Regulation No. 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention, oj L 31/1, 15 December 2000 (2000 Eurodac Regulation).Google Scholar
Council Regulation No. 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national, oj L 50/1, 25 February 2003 (2003 Dublin Regulation).Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No. 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes, and amending Regulation (EU) No. 1077/2011 establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale it systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (recast), oj L 180/1, 29 June 2013 (Recast Eurodac Regulation).Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast), oj L 180/31, 29 June 2013 (Recast Dublin Regulation).Google Scholar
Constitution of the Year I – First Republic – 24 June 1793 (Constitution de l'An I – Première République – 24 juin 1793).Google Scholar
Constitution of the IVth Republic from 1946 – 27 October 1946 (Constitution de 1946, IVe République – 27 octobre 1946).Google Scholar
Constitution of the Vth Republic from 1958 – 4 October 1958 (Constitution de 1958, Ve République – 4 octobre 1958).Google Scholar
Code on the entry and residence of aliens and the right of asylum (Code de l’entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d’asile, CESEDA).Google Scholar
Law No. 52–893 of 25 July 1952 establishing a French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (Loi n°52–893 du 25 juillet 1952 portant création d'un office français de protection des réfugiés et des apatrides, JORF du 27 juillet 1952, p. 7642).Google Scholar
Law No. 98–349 of 11 May 1998 on the entry and residence of foreigners in France and the right of asylum (Loi n° 98–349 du 11 mai 1998 relative a l’entrée et au séjour des étrangers en France et au droit d’asile (RESEDA), JORF n°109 du 12 mai 1998, p. 7087).Google Scholar
Law No. 2003–1176 of 10 December 2003 amending Law 52–893 of 25 July 1952 on the right of asylum (Loi n° 2003–1176 du 10 décembre 2003 modifiant la loi n° 52–893 du 25 juillet 1952 relative au droit d'asile, JORF n°286 du 11 décembre 2003, p. 21080).Google Scholar
Law No. 2007–1631 of 20 November 2007 on the control of immigration, integration and asylum (Loi n° 2007–1631 du 20 novembre 2007 relative à la maîtrise de l'immigration, à l'intégration et à l'asile, JORF n°270 du 21 novembre 2007, p. 18993).Google Scholar
Law No. 2015–925 of 29 July 2015 on the reform of asylum law (Loi n° 2015–925 du 29 juillet 2015 relative à la réforme du droit d'asile, JORF n°0174 du 30 juillet 2015, p. 12977).Google Scholar
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany of 23 May 1949 (Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23. Mai 1949 (BGBl. S. 1)).Google Scholar
Act concerning the legal status of refugees of 1 September 1953 (Gesetz betreffend das Abkommen vom 28. Juli 1951 über die Rechtsstellung der Flüchtlinge vom 1. September 1953, BGBl. II 559).Google Scholar
Order on the Recognition and Distribution of Foreign Refugees (Asylum Ordinance) of 6 January 1953 (Verordnung über die Anerkennung und die Verteilung von ausländischen Flüchtlingen (Asylverordnung) vom 6. Januar 1953, BGBl 1953 Abs. 1 3).Google Scholar
Aliens Act of the Federal Republic of Germany of 28 April 1965 (Ausländergesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 28. April 1965; BGBl. I 1965 353).Google Scholar
Law on the residence, employment and the integration of foreigners in the federal territory of 30 July 2004 (Residence Act) (Gesetz über den Aufenthalt, die Erwerbstätigkeit und die Integration von Ausländern im Bundesgebiet vom 30. Juli 2004 (Aufenthaltsgesetz, AufenthG); BGBl. I 2004 1950).Google Scholar
Act implementing the European Union directives on residence and asylum of 19 August 2007 (Gesetz zur Umsetzung aufenthalts- und asylrechtlicher Richtlinien der Europäischen Union vom 19. August 2007, BGBl. I 2007 1970, ‘Richtlinienumsetzungsgesetz’).Google Scholar
Act implementing the Directive 2011/95/EU of 28 August 2013 (Gesetz zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU vom 28. August 2013, BGBl. I 2013 3473).Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1978 (Constitución española de 1978; B.O.E. núm. 311, de 29 de diciembre de 1978, páginas 29313 a 29424).Google Scholar
Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right of asylum and refugee status (Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado; B.O.E. núm. 74, de 27 de marzo de 1984, páginas 8389 a 8392).Google Scholar
Law 9/1994, of 19 May, amending Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right to asylum and refugee status (Ley 9/1994, de 19 de mayo, de modificación de la Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado; B.O.E. núm. 122, de 23 de mayo de 1994, páginas 15796 a 15800).Google Scholar
Law 12/2009 of 30 October, regulating the right of asylum and subsidiary protection (Ley 12/2009 de 30 de octubre, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la protección subsidiaria; B.O.E. núm. 263 del 31 de Octubre de 2009).Google Scholar
Royal Decree 203/1995, of 10 February, which approves the Regulation implementing Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right to asylum and refugee status, as amended by Law 9/1994, of 19 May (Real Decreto 203/1995, de 10 de febrero, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento de aplicación de la Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado, modificada por la Ley 9/1994, de 19 de mayo; B.O.E. núm. 52, de 2 de marzo de 1995, páginas 7237 a 7246).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 July 1951, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p. 137.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 31 January 1967, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 606, p. 267.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2002) Guidelines on International Protection No. 1: Gender-Related Persecution within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 7 May 2002, HCR/GIP/02/01, www.refworld.org/docid/3d36f1c64.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2002) Guidelines on International Protection No. 2: ‘Membership of a Particular Social Group’ within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 7 May 2002, HCR/GIP/02/02, www.refworld.org/docid/3d36f23f4.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2003) Guidelines on International Protection No. 4: ‘Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative’ within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 23 July 2003, HCR/GIP/03/04, www.refworld.org/docid/3f2791a44.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2004) Guidelines on International Protection No. 6: Religion-Based Refugee Claims under Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 April 2004, HCR/GIP/04/06, www.refworld.org/docid/4090f9794.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2008) UNHCR Guidance Note on Refugee Claims Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, 21 November 2008, www.refworld.org/docid/48abd5660.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2012) Guidelines on International Protection No. 9: Claims to Refugee Status Based on Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 23 October 2012, HCR/GIP/12/01, www.refworld.org/docid/50348afc2.html.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5 (European Convention of Human Rights, ECHR).Google Scholar
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 26 October 2012, 2012/C 326/02 (EU Charter).Google Scholar
Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts of 2 October 1997, oj C 340, 10 November 1997 (entry into force 1 May 1999).Google Scholar
Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, oj C 306, 17 December 2007 (entry into force 1 December 2009).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, oj L 31/18, 6 February 2003 (2003 Reception Conditions Directive).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, oj L 304/12, 30 September 2004 (2004 Qualification Directive).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status, oj L 326/13, 13 December 2005 (2005 Asylum Procedures Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast), oj L 337/9, 20 December 2011 (Recast Qualification Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast), oj L 180/160, 29 June 2013 (Recast Asylum Procedures Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast), oj L 1980/96, 29 June 2013 (Recast Reception Conditions Directive).Google Scholar
Regulation No. 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention, oj L 31/1, 15 December 2000 (2000 Eurodac Regulation).Google Scholar
Council Regulation No. 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national, oj L 50/1, 25 February 2003 (2003 Dublin Regulation).Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No. 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes, and amending Regulation (EU) No. 1077/2011 establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale it systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (recast), oj L 180/1, 29 June 2013 (Recast Eurodac Regulation).Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast), oj L 180/31, 29 June 2013 (Recast Dublin Regulation).Google Scholar
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 26 October 2012, 2012/C 326/02 (EU Charter).Google Scholar
Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts of 2 October 1997, oj C 340, 10 November 1997 (entry into force 1 May 1999).Google Scholar
Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, oj C 306, 17 December 2007 (entry into force 1 December 2009).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, oj L 31/18, 6 February 2003 (2003 Reception Conditions Directive).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, oj L 304/12, 30 September 2004 (2004 Qualification Directive).Google Scholar
Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status, oj L 326/13, 13 December 2005 (2005 Asylum Procedures Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast), oj L 337/9, 20 December 2011 (Recast Qualification Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast), oj L 180/160, 29 June 2013 (Recast Asylum Procedures Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast), oj L 1980/96, 29 June 2013 (Recast Reception Conditions Directive).Google Scholar
Regulation No. 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention, oj L 31/1, 15 December 2000 (2000 Eurodac Regulation).Google Scholar
Council Regulation No. 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national, oj L 50/1, 25 February 2003 (2003 Dublin Regulation).Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No. 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes, and amending Regulation (EU) No. 1077/2011 establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale it systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (recast), oj L 180/1, 29 June 2013 (Recast Eurodac Regulation).Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast), oj L 180/31, 29 June 2013 (Recast Dublin Regulation).Google Scholar
Constitution of the Year I – First Republic – 24 June 1793 (Constitution de l'An I – Première République – 24 juin 1793).Google Scholar
Constitution of the IVth Republic from 1946 – 27 October 1946 (Constitution de 1946, IVe République – 27 octobre 1946).Google Scholar
Constitution of the Vth Republic from 1958 – 4 October 1958 (Constitution de 1958, Ve République – 4 octobre 1958).Google Scholar
Code on the entry and residence of aliens and the right of asylum (Code de l’entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d’asile, CESEDA).Google Scholar
Law No. 52–893 of 25 July 1952 establishing a French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (Loi n°52–893 du 25 juillet 1952 portant création d'un office français de protection des réfugiés et des apatrides, JORF du 27 juillet 1952, p. 7642).Google Scholar
Law No. 98–349 of 11 May 1998 on the entry and residence of foreigners in France and the right of asylum (Loi n° 98–349 du 11 mai 1998 relative a l’entrée et au séjour des étrangers en France et au droit d’asile (RESEDA), JORF n°109 du 12 mai 1998, p. 7087).Google Scholar
Law No. 2003–1176 of 10 December 2003 amending Law 52–893 of 25 July 1952 on the right of asylum (Loi n° 2003–1176 du 10 décembre 2003 modifiant la loi n° 52–893 du 25 juillet 1952 relative au droit d'asile, JORF n°286 du 11 décembre 2003, p. 21080).Google Scholar
Law No. 2007–1631 of 20 November 2007 on the control of immigration, integration and asylum (Loi n° 2007–1631 du 20 novembre 2007 relative à la maîtrise de l'immigration, à l'intégration et à l'asile, JORF n°270 du 21 novembre 2007, p. 18993).Google Scholar
Law No. 2015–925 of 29 July 2015 on the reform of asylum law (Loi n° 2015–925 du 29 juillet 2015 relative à la réforme du droit d'asile, JORF n°0174 du 30 juillet 2015, p. 12977).Google Scholar
Constitution of the Year I – First Republic – 24 June 1793 (Constitution de l'An I – Première République – 24 juin 1793).Google Scholar
Constitution of the IVth Republic from 1946 – 27 October 1946 (Constitution de 1946, IVe République – 27 octobre 1946).Google Scholar
Constitution of the Vth Republic from 1958 – 4 October 1958 (Constitution de 1958, Ve République – 4 octobre 1958).Google Scholar
Code on the entry and residence of aliens and the right of asylum (Code de l’entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d’asile, CESEDA).Google Scholar
Law No. 52–893 of 25 July 1952 establishing a French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (Loi n°52–893 du 25 juillet 1952 portant création d'un office français de protection des réfugiés et des apatrides, JORF du 27 juillet 1952, p. 7642).Google Scholar
Law No. 98–349 of 11 May 1998 on the entry and residence of foreigners in France and the right of asylum (Loi n° 98–349 du 11 mai 1998 relative a l’entrée et au séjour des étrangers en France et au droit d’asile (RESEDA), JORF n°109 du 12 mai 1998, p. 7087).Google Scholar
Law No. 2003–1176 of 10 December 2003 amending Law 52–893 of 25 July 1952 on the right of asylum (Loi n° 2003–1176 du 10 décembre 2003 modifiant la loi n° 52–893 du 25 juillet 1952 relative au droit d'asile, JORF n°286 du 11 décembre 2003, p. 21080).Google Scholar
Law No. 2007–1631 of 20 November 2007 on the control of immigration, integration and asylum (Loi n° 2007–1631 du 20 novembre 2007 relative à la maîtrise de l'immigration, à l'intégration et à l'asile, JORF n°270 du 21 novembre 2007, p. 18993).Google Scholar
Law No. 2015–925 of 29 July 2015 on the reform of asylum law (Loi n° 2015–925 du 29 juillet 2015 relative à la réforme du droit d'asile, JORF n°0174 du 30 juillet 2015, p. 12977).Google Scholar
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany of 23 May 1949 (Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23. Mai 1949 (BGBl. S. 1)).Google Scholar
Act concerning the legal status of refugees of 1 September 1953 (Gesetz betreffend das Abkommen vom 28. Juli 1951 über die Rechtsstellung der Flüchtlinge vom 1. September 1953, BGBl. II 559).Google Scholar
Order on the Recognition and Distribution of Foreign Refugees (Asylum Ordinance) of 6 January 1953 (Verordnung über die Anerkennung und die Verteilung von ausländischen Flüchtlingen (Asylverordnung) vom 6. Januar 1953, BGBl 1953 Abs. 1 3).Google Scholar
Aliens Act of the Federal Republic of Germany of 28 April 1965 (Ausländergesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 28. April 1965; BGBl. I 1965 353).Google Scholar
Law on the residence, employment and the integration of foreigners in the federal territory of 30 July 2004 (Residence Act) (Gesetz über den Aufenthalt, die Erwerbstätigkeit und die Integration von Ausländern im Bundesgebiet vom 30. Juli 2004 (Aufenthaltsgesetz, AufenthG); BGBl. I 2004 1950).Google Scholar
Act implementing the European Union directives on residence and asylum of 19 August 2007 (Gesetz zur Umsetzung aufenthalts- und asylrechtlicher Richtlinien der Europäischen Union vom 19. August 2007, BGBl. I 2007 1970, ‘Richtlinienumsetzungsgesetz’).Google Scholar
Act implementing the Directive 2011/95/EU of 28 August 2013 (Gesetz zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU vom 28. August 2013, BGBl. I 2013 3473).Google Scholar
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany of 23 May 1949 (Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23. Mai 1949 (BGBl. S. 1)).Google Scholar
Act concerning the legal status of refugees of 1 September 1953 (Gesetz betreffend das Abkommen vom 28. Juli 1951 über die Rechtsstellung der Flüchtlinge vom 1. September 1953, BGBl. II 559).Google Scholar
Order on the Recognition and Distribution of Foreign Refugees (Asylum Ordinance) of 6 January 1953 (Verordnung über die Anerkennung und die Verteilung von ausländischen Flüchtlingen (Asylverordnung) vom 6. Januar 1953, BGBl 1953 Abs. 1 3).Google Scholar
Aliens Act of the Federal Republic of Germany of 28 April 1965 (Ausländergesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 28. April 1965; BGBl. I 1965 353).Google Scholar
Law on the residence, employment and the integration of foreigners in the federal territory of 30 July 2004 (Residence Act) (Gesetz über den Aufenthalt, die Erwerbstätigkeit und die Integration von Ausländern im Bundesgebiet vom 30. Juli 2004 (Aufenthaltsgesetz, AufenthG); BGBl. I 2004 1950).Google Scholar
Act implementing the European Union directives on residence and asylum of 19 August 2007 (Gesetz zur Umsetzung aufenthalts- und asylrechtlicher Richtlinien der Europäischen Union vom 19. August 2007, BGBl. I 2007 1970, ‘Richtlinienumsetzungsgesetz’).Google Scholar
Act implementing the Directive 2011/95/EU of 28 August 2013 (Gesetz zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU vom 28. August 2013, BGBl. I 2013 3473).Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1978 (Constitución española de 1978; B.O.E. núm. 311, de 29 de diciembre de 1978, páginas 29313 a 29424).Google Scholar
Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right of asylum and refugee status (Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado; B.O.E. núm. 74, de 27 de marzo de 1984, páginas 8389 a 8392).Google Scholar
Law 9/1994, of 19 May, amending Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right to asylum and refugee status (Ley 9/1994, de 19 de mayo, de modificación de la Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado; B.O.E. núm. 122, de 23 de mayo de 1994, páginas 15796 a 15800).Google Scholar
Law 12/2009 of 30 October, regulating the right of asylum and subsidiary protection (Ley 12/2009 de 30 de octubre, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la protección subsidiaria; B.O.E. núm. 263 del 31 de Octubre de 2009).Google Scholar
Royal Decree 203/1995, of 10 February, which approves the Regulation implementing Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right to asylum and refugee status, as amended by Law 9/1994, of 19 May (Real Decreto 203/1995, de 10 de febrero, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento de aplicación de la Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado, modificada por la Ley 9/1994, de 19 de mayo; B.O.E. núm. 52, de 2 de marzo de 1995, páginas 7237 a 7246).Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1978 (Constitución española de 1978; B.O.E. núm. 311, de 29 de diciembre de 1978, páginas 29313 a 29424).Google Scholar
Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right of asylum and refugee status (Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado; B.O.E. núm. 74, de 27 de marzo de 1984, páginas 8389 a 8392).Google Scholar
Law 9/1994, of 19 May, amending Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right to asylum and refugee status (Ley 9/1994, de 19 de mayo, de modificación de la Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado; B.O.E. núm. 122, de 23 de mayo de 1994, páginas 15796 a 15800).Google Scholar
Law 12/2009 of 30 October, regulating the right of asylum and subsidiary protection (Ley 12/2009 de 30 de octubre, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la protección subsidiaria; B.O.E. núm. 263 del 31 de Octubre de 2009).Google Scholar
Royal Decree 203/1995, of 10 February, which approves the Regulation implementing Law 5/1984, of 26 March, regulating the right to asylum and refugee status, as amended by Law 9/1994, of 19 May (Real Decreto 203/1995, de 10 de febrero, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento de aplicación de la Ley 5/1984, de 26 de marzo, reguladora del derecho de asilo y de la condición de refugiado, modificada por la Ley 9/1994, de 19 de mayo; B.O.E. núm. 52, de 2 de marzo de 1995, páginas 7237 a 7246).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 July 1951, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p. 137.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 31 January 1967, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 606, p. 267.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2002) Guidelines on International Protection No. 1: Gender-Related Persecution within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 7 May 2002, HCR/GIP/02/01, www.refworld.org/docid/3d36f1c64.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2002) Guidelines on International Protection No. 2: ‘Membership of a Particular Social Group’ within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 7 May 2002, HCR/GIP/02/02, www.refworld.org/docid/3d36f23f4.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2003) Guidelines on International Protection No. 4: ‘Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative’ within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 23 July 2003, HCR/GIP/03/04, www.refworld.org/docid/3f2791a44.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2004) Guidelines on International Protection No. 6: Religion-Based Refugee Claims under Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 April 2004, HCR/GIP/04/06, www.refworld.org/docid/4090f9794.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2008) UNHCR Guidance Note on Refugee Claims Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, 21 November 2008, www.refworld.org/docid/48abd5660.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2012) Guidelines on International Protection No. 9: Claims to Refugee Status Based on Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 23 October 2012, HCR/GIP/12/01, www.refworld.org/docid/50348afc2.html.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 July 1951, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p. 137.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 31 January 1967, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 606, p. 267.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2002) Guidelines on International Protection No. 1: Gender-Related Persecution within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 7 May 2002, HCR/GIP/02/01, www.refworld.org/docid/3d36f1c64.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2002) Guidelines on International Protection No. 2: ‘Membership of a Particular Social Group’ within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 7 May 2002, HCR/GIP/02/02, www.refworld.org/docid/3d36f23f4.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2003) Guidelines on International Protection No. 4: ‘Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative’ within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 23 July 2003, HCR/GIP/03/04, www.refworld.org/docid/3f2791a44.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2004) Guidelines on International Protection No. 6: Religion-Based Refugee Claims under Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 April 2004, HCR/GIP/04/06, www.refworld.org/docid/4090f9794.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2008) UNHCR Guidance Note on Refugee Claims Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, 21 November 2008, www.refworld.org/docid/48abd5660.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2012) Guidelines on International Protection No. 9: Claims to Refugee Status Based on Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 23 October 2012, HCR/GIP/12/01, www.refworld.org/docid/50348afc2.html.Google Scholar
Judgments are listed in ascending chronological order (by date of decision).Google Scholar
Applicant A and Another v. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs and Another, [1997] 190 CLR 225, Australia: High Court, 24 February 1997.Google Scholar
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Khawar [2002] HCA 14, Australia: High Court, 11 April 2002.Google Scholar
Appellant S395/2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Appellant S396/2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, [2003] HCA 71, Australia: High Court, 9 December 2003.Google Scholar
Applicant S v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2004] HCA 25, Australia: High Court, 27 May 2004.Google Scholar
Applicant NABD of 2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, [2005] HCA 29, Australia: High Court, 26 May 2005.Google Scholar
Win v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 132, Australia: Federal Court, 23 February 2001.Google Scholar
SZJSL v. Minister for Immigration & Another [2007] FCMA 313, Australia: Federal Magistrates Court, 19 February 2007.Google Scholar
RRT Case No. V95/03527, [1998] RRTA 246, Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal, 9 February 1996.Google Scholar
RRT Reference No. N97/14768 (Unreported, P Thomson, 29 April 1998); case cited from: Jenni Millbank (2002) ‘Imagining Otherness: Refugee Claims on the Basis of Sexuality in Canada and Australia’, 26 Melbourne University Law Review 144, 145–146.Google Scholar
Canada (Attorney General) v. Ward, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 689, Canada: Supreme Court, 30 June 1993.Google Scholar
Khrystych v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 498, Canada: Federal Court, 12 April 2004.Google Scholar
MA5-04358, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 19 January 2006.Google Scholar
TA1-11498, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 7 February 2006.Google Scholar
MA6-01843, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 1 November 2006.Google Scholar
Re S. (I.Q.) [1994] C.R.D.D. No. 323 (QL); case cited from: Nicole LaViolette (1997) ‘The Immutable Refugees: Sexual Orientation in Canada (A.G.) v. Ward’, 55(1) University of Toronto Law Review 1–41, 35.Google Scholar
Salahadin Abdulla and Others v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Joined Cases C-175/08, C-176/08, C-178/08 and C-179/08, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 2 March 2010.Google Scholar
Nawras Bolbol v. Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal, Case C-31/09, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 17 June 2010.Google Scholar
Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. B and D, Joined Cases C-57/09 and C-101/09, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 9 November 2010.Google Scholar
Federal Republic of Germany v. Y and Z, Joined Cases C-71/11 and C-99/11, Court of Justice of the European Union, 5 September 2012.Google Scholar
X, Y and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel, Joined Cases C-199/12, C-200/12 and C-201/12, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 7 November 2013.Google Scholar
Mohammad Ferooz Qurbani, Case C-481/13, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 17 July 2014.Google Scholar
A, B, C v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, Joined Cases C‑148/13 to C‑150/13, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 2 December 2014.Google Scholar
Federal Republic of Germany v. Y and Z (Opinion of Advocate General Bot), Joined Cases C-71/11 and C-99/11, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 19 April 2012.Google Scholar
X, Y and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston), Joined Cases C-199/12, C-200/12 and C-201/12, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 11 July 2013.Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2011 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany), Kashayar Khavand v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Case C-563/10), ‘Removal’.Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 24 March 2011 (References for preliminary rulings from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Germany), Federal Republic of Germany v. Y (Case C-71/11) and Federal Republic of Germany v. Z (Case C-99/11), ‘Joining’ [Beschluss des Präsidenten des Gerichtshofs vom 24. März 2011, ‘Verbindung’ in der Rechtssache C-71/11 und in der Rechtssache C-99/11].Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 15 April 2016 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, Germany), Federal Commissioner for Asylum Affairs v. N (Case C-150/15), ‘Removal’ [Beschluss des Präsidenten des Gerichtshofs 15. April 2016 ‘Streichung’ In der Rechtssache C‑150/15].Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany) lodged on 1 December 2010, Kashayar Khavand v. Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-563/10).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 18 February 2011, Federal Republic of Germany v. Y (Case C-71/11).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 2 March 2011, Federal Republic of Germany v. Z (Case C-99/11).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012, Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel v. X (Case C-199/12).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 March 2015, Federal Commissioner for Asylum Affairs v. N (Case C-150/15).Google Scholar
CC, décision no. 93–325 DC du 12 août 1993.Google Scholar
CC, décision no. 97–389 DC du 22 avril 1997.Google Scholar
CE, 23 juin 1997, 171858, Ourbih.Google Scholar
CE, 23 août 2006, 272679, Olena.Google Scholar
CE, 27 juillet 2012, 342552, O.A.Google Scholar
CE, 27 juillet 2012, 349824.Google Scholar
CE, 17 juin 2016, 391534.Google Scholar
CRR 17 décembre 1993, Koloskov, Documentation réfugiés no. 245, cited in Virginie Fraissinier-Amiot (2011) ‘Les homosexuels étrangers et le droit d’asile en France: un octroi en demi-teinte’, 27(2) Revue française de droit administratif 291–300 at 293.Google Scholar
CRR 12 mai 1999, 328310, Djellal.Google Scholar
CRR 22 mai 2000 340068, M. E.Google Scholar
CRR 4 octobre 2000, 330627, M. M.Google Scholar
CRR 6 février 2001, 359001, M. B.Google Scholar
CRR 29 juin 2001, 367645, M. K.Google Scholar
CRR 13 septembre 2001, 379319, M. N.Google Scholar
CRR 23 mai 2002, 388492, M. K.Google Scholar
CRR 23 juillet 2002, 394788.Google Scholar
CRR 26 novembre 2002, 402381, M. T.Google Scholar
CRR 12 octobre 2004, 483808, M. A.Google Scholar
CRR 25 mars 2005, 513547, Mlle G.Google Scholar
CRR 12 septembre 2005, 498570, Mme. AGB.Google Scholar
CRR 12 mai 2006, 555672, MS.Google Scholar
CRR 2 mars 2007, 578257 S.Google Scholar
CRR 18 mai 2007, 589676 D.Google Scholar
CNDA 11 avril 2008, 571886 G.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 mai 2008, 605398 H.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er juillet 2008, 571904, K.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 juillet 2009, 634565/08015025, C.Google Scholar
CNDA 3 novembre 2010, 09018078 O.Google Scholar
CNDA 10 janvier 2011, 09012710 C+, M. N.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er mars 2011, 09023968 C, M. I.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 mars 2011, 10002367 M.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er juin 2011, 10015959 C, Mlle N.Google Scholar
CNDA 24 juin 2011, 10025142 C, M. V.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 juillet 2011, 11002234 C, M. K.Google Scholar
CNDA 11 juillet 2011, 10020448 C, M. M.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 juillet 2011, 09004056 C, M. B.Google Scholar
CNDA 3 novembre 2011, 11010972 C, M. A.Google Scholar
CNDA 21 novembre 2011, 11010494 C, Mlle M.Google Scholar
CNDA 28 novembre 2011, 10019216 C, M. C.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 mai 2012, 11009260 C, M. D.Google Scholar
CNDA 18 octobre 2012, 12013647 C, M. B. N.Google Scholar
CNDA 12 février 2013, 11029513 C, M. M.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 novembre 2013, 13007332 C, M. F.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 novembre 2013, 13018825 C, M. A.Google Scholar
CNDA 10 juillet 2014, 13025005 C, M. J-J.Google Scholar
CNDA 19 décembre 2014, 14017576 C, Mme W.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 octobre 2015, 15006472 C+, M. H.Google Scholar
CNDA 18 mars 2016, 15031443 C, M. K.Google Scholar
CNDA 14 juin 2016, 15030258 C, Mme E.Google Scholar
CNDA 27 septembre 2016, 15004721 C, Mme T.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 54, 341, Urteil vom 02.07.1980.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 74, 51, Urteil vom 26.11.1986.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 76, 143, Beschluss vom 01.07.1987.Google Scholar
BverfGE 80, 315, Urteil vom 10.07.1989.Google Scholar
BVerwG Urteil vom 15.3.1988, 9 C 278/86.Google Scholar
BverwG, Urteil vom 17.10.1989, 9 C 25/89.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 88, 367, Urteil vom 23.7.1991, 9 C 154/90.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 92, 278, Urteil vom 13.05.1993, 9 C 49/92.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 95, 42, Urteil vom 18.01.1994, 9 C 48/92.Google Scholar
BVerwG Urteile vom 20.2.2013, 10 C 20.12; 10 C 21.12; 10 C 22.12; 10 C 23.12.Google Scholar
Hess. VGH, Urteil vom 21.08.1986, 10 OE 69/83.Google Scholar
VGH München, Beschluss vom 12.11.1998, 19 ZB 98.33916.Google Scholar
OVG Münster, Beschluss vom 23.11.2010, 13 A 1013/09.A.Google Scholar
VGH Baden Württemberg, Urteile vom 7.3.2013, A 9 S 1872/12; A 9 S 1873/12.Google Scholar
VG Wiesbaden, Urteil vom 26.4.1983, IV/I E 06244/81, cited from Maryellen Fullerton (1990) ‘Persecution Due to Membership in a Particular Social Group: Jurisprudence in the Federal Republic of Germany’, 4 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 381–444 at 408–410.Google Scholar
VG Ansbach, Urteil vom 11.10.2000, AN 3 K 00.31628.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Urteil vom 16.7.2002, W 7 K 01.30170.Google Scholar
VG Bremen, Urteil vom 28.4.2006, 7 K 632/05.A.Google Scholar
VG Köln, Urteil vom 8.9.2006, 18 K 9030/03.A.Google Scholar
VG München, Urteil vom 30.1.2007, M 21 K 04.51494.Google Scholar
VG Münster, Beschluss vom 4.7.2007, 9 L 381/07.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 21.2.2008, 11 K 2432/07.A.Google Scholar
VG Chemnitz, Urteil vom 11.7.2008, A 2 K 304/06.Google Scholar
VG Ansbach, Urteil vom 21.8.2008, AN 18 K 08.30201.Google Scholar
VG Neustadt/Weinstraße, Urteil vom 8.9.2008, 3 K 753/07.NW.Google Scholar
VG Regensburg, Urteil vom 15.9.2008, RN 8 K 08.30020.Google Scholar
VG Berlin, Urteil vom 3.12.2008, 23 X 30.06.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 11.3.2009, 5 K 1875/08.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 14.1.2010, 11 K 6778/09.A.Google Scholar
VG Sigmaringen, Urteil vom 26.4.2010, A 1 K 1911/09.Google Scholar
VG Trier, Beschluss vom 9.9.2010, 1 L 928-10.TR.Google Scholar
VG Frankfurt/Oder, Urteil vom 11.11.2010, VG 4 K 772/10.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 23.3.2012, 13 K 1217/11.A.Google Scholar
VG Berlin, Beschluss vom 29.10.2013, 34 L 89.13 A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 13.12.2013, 13 K 3683/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Potsdam, Urteil vom 27.2.2014, VG 6 K 435/13.A.Google Scholar
VG München, Urteil vom 24.4.2014, M 4 K 13.30114.Google Scholar
VG Potsdam, Urteil vom 13.5.2014, VG 6 K 3802/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Beschluss vom 21.8.2014, W 1 S 14.30384.Google Scholar
VG Augsburg, Urteil vom 31.10.2014, Au 3 K 14.30222.Google Scholar
VG Aachen, Urteil vom 12.12.2014, 2 K 1477/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Saarland, Urteil vom 23.1.2015, 5 K 534/13.Google Scholar
VG Braunschweig, Urteil vom 2.9.2015, 7 A 68/15.Google Scholar
VG Frankfurt/Oder, Urteil vom 19.11.2015, 4 K 109912.A.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Urteil vom 1.7.2016, W 6 K 15.30116.Google Scholar
Re GJ, Refugee Appeal No. 1312/93, New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority, 30 August 1995.Google Scholar
Refugee Appeal No. 74665/03, New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority, 7 July 2004.Google Scholar
STS 7098/2005 de 30 de noviembre de 2005.Google Scholar
STS 2331/2006 de 21 de abril de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 4511/2003 de 29 de septiembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 8650/2006 de 14 de diciembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 8248/2006 de 22 de diciembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 5650/2007 de 25 de julio de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 6674/2007 de 4 de octubre de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 8251/2007 de 13 de diciembre de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 5265/2005 de 28 de noviembre de 2008.Google Scholar
STS 3901/2011 de 16 de junio de 2011.Google Scholar
STS 5907/2012 de 21 de septiembre de 2012.Google Scholar
STS 1957/2013 de 27 de marzo de 2013.Google Scholar
STS 1971/2013 de 27 de marzo de 2013.Google Scholar
STS 376/2014 de 12 de febrero de 2014.Google Scholar
STS 4492/2015 de 2 de noviembre de 2015.Google Scholar
STS 124/2016 de 25 de enero de 2016.Google Scholar
STS 3847/2016 de 18 de julio de 2016.Google Scholar
SAN 3500/1998 de 29 de septiembre del 1998.Google Scholar
SAN 4388/1998 de 6 de noviembre del 1998.Google Scholar
SAN 6483/1999 de 29 de octubre del 1999.Google Scholar
SAN 1890/2001 de 23 de marzo de 2001.Google Scholar
SAN 4464/2002 de 12 de julio de 2002.Google Scholar
SAN 2628/2003 de 11 de noviembre de 2003.Google Scholar
SAN 1790/2005 de 30 de marzo de 2005.Google Scholar
SAN 5515/2006 de 30 de noviembre 2006.Google Scholar
SAN 200/2007 de 30 de enero de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 2491/2007 de 23 de mayo de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 3139/2007 de 4 de julio de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 5321/2008 de 7 de noviembre de 2008.Google Scholar
SAN 5372/2008 de 10 de diciembre de 2008.Google Scholar
SAN 1003/2009 de 25 de febrero de 2009.Google Scholar
SAN 379/2011 de 31 de enero de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 842/2011 de 18 de febrero de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 1584/2011 de 24 de marzo de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 1832/2014 de 30 de abril de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2340/2013 de 12 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2523/2014 de 18 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2122/2014 de 22 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2530/2014 de 30 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2533/2014 de 30 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2793/2014 de 12 de junio de 2014.Google Scholar
HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2010] UKSC 31, United Kingdom: Supreme Court, 7 July 2010.Google Scholar
RT (Zimbabwe) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2012] UKSC 38, United Kingdom: Supreme Court, 25 July 2012.Google Scholar
Mendis v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Secretary of State for the Home Department, [1989] Imm AR 6, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 17 June 1988.Google Scholar
Ahmad and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [1990] Imm AR 61, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 6 October 1989.Google Scholar
Danian v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appeal), [2000] Imm AR 96, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 28 October 1999.Google Scholar
Ahmed (Iftikhar) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2000] INLR 1, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 5 November 1999.Google Scholar
Demirkaya v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1999] Imm AR 498, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 23 July 1999.Google Scholar
SW (lesbians – HJ and HT applied) Jamaica v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, UK, CG [2011] UKUT 00251(IAC), United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), 24 June 2011.Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), United States Supreme Court, 30 June 1986.Google Scholar
Matter of Acosta, 19 I. & N. Dec. 11 (B.I.A. 1985), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 1 March 1985.Google Scholar
In re Toboso-Alfonso, 20 I. & N. Dec. 819 (B.I.A. 1990), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 12 March 1990.Google Scholar
In re Fauziya Kasinga, 21 I. & N. Dec. 357 (B.I.A. 1996), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 13 June 1996.Google Scholar
Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 7 February 2014.Google Scholar
Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 208 (BIA 2014), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 7 February 2014.Google Scholar
Applicant A and Another v. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs and Another, [1997] 190 CLR 225, Australia: High Court, 24 February 1997.Google Scholar
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Khawar [2002] HCA 14, Australia: High Court, 11 April 2002.Google Scholar
Appellant S395/2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Appellant S396/2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, [2003] HCA 71, Australia: High Court, 9 December 2003.Google Scholar
Applicant S v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2004] HCA 25, Australia: High Court, 27 May 2004.Google Scholar
Applicant NABD of 2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, [2005] HCA 29, Australia: High Court, 26 May 2005.Google Scholar
Win v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 132, Australia: Federal Court, 23 February 2001.Google Scholar
SZJSL v. Minister for Immigration & Another [2007] FCMA 313, Australia: Federal Magistrates Court, 19 February 2007.Google Scholar
RRT Case No. V95/03527, [1998] RRTA 246, Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal, 9 February 1996.Google Scholar
RRT Reference No. N97/14768 (Unreported, P Thomson, 29 April 1998); case cited from: Jenni Millbank (2002) ‘Imagining Otherness: Refugee Claims on the Basis of Sexuality in Canada and Australia’, 26 Melbourne University Law Review 144, 145–146.Google Scholar
Applicant A and Another v. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs and Another, [1997] 190 CLR 225, Australia: High Court, 24 February 1997.Google Scholar
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Khawar [2002] HCA 14, Australia: High Court, 11 April 2002.Google Scholar
Appellant S395/2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Appellant S396/2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, [2003] HCA 71, Australia: High Court, 9 December 2003.Google Scholar
Applicant S v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2004] HCA 25, Australia: High Court, 27 May 2004.Google Scholar
Applicant NABD of 2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, [2005] HCA 29, Australia: High Court, 26 May 2005.Google Scholar
Win v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 132, Australia: Federal Court, 23 February 2001.Google Scholar
SZJSL v. Minister for Immigration & Another [2007] FCMA 313, Australia: Federal Magistrates Court, 19 February 2007.Google Scholar
RRT Case No. V95/03527, [1998] RRTA 246, Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal, 9 February 1996.Google Scholar
RRT Reference No. N97/14768 (Unreported, P Thomson, 29 April 1998); case cited from: Jenni Millbank (2002) ‘Imagining Otherness: Refugee Claims on the Basis of Sexuality in Canada and Australia’, 26 Melbourne University Law Review 144, 145–146.Google Scholar
Canada (Attorney General) v. Ward, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 689, Canada: Supreme Court, 30 June 1993.Google Scholar
Khrystych v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 498, Canada: Federal Court, 12 April 2004.Google Scholar
MA5-04358, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 19 January 2006.Google Scholar
TA1-11498, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 7 February 2006.Google Scholar
MA6-01843, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 1 November 2006.Google Scholar
Re S. (I.Q.) [1994] C.R.D.D. No. 323 (QL); case cited from: Nicole LaViolette (1997) ‘The Immutable Refugees: Sexual Orientation in Canada (A.G.) v. Ward’, 55(1) University of Toronto Law Review 1–41, 35.Google Scholar
Canada (Attorney General) v. Ward, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 689, Canada: Supreme Court, 30 June 1993.Google Scholar
Khrystych v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 498, Canada: Federal Court, 12 April 2004.Google Scholar
MA5-04358, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 19 January 2006.Google Scholar
TA1-11498, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 7 February 2006.Google Scholar
MA6-01843, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board, 1 November 2006.Google Scholar
Re S. (I.Q.) [1994] C.R.D.D. No. 323 (QL); case cited from: Nicole LaViolette (1997) ‘The Immutable Refugees: Sexual Orientation in Canada (A.G.) v. Ward’, 55(1) University of Toronto Law Review 1–41, 35.Google Scholar
Salahadin Abdulla and Others v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Joined Cases C-175/08, C-176/08, C-178/08 and C-179/08, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 2 March 2010.Google Scholar
Nawras Bolbol v. Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal, Case C-31/09, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 17 June 2010.Google Scholar
Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. B and D, Joined Cases C-57/09 and C-101/09, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 9 November 2010.Google Scholar
Federal Republic of Germany v. Y and Z, Joined Cases C-71/11 and C-99/11, Court of Justice of the European Union, 5 September 2012.Google Scholar
X, Y and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel, Joined Cases C-199/12, C-200/12 and C-201/12, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 7 November 2013.Google Scholar
Mohammad Ferooz Qurbani, Case C-481/13, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 17 July 2014.Google Scholar
A, B, C v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, Joined Cases C‑148/13 to C‑150/13, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 2 December 2014.Google Scholar
Federal Republic of Germany v. Y and Z (Opinion of Advocate General Bot), Joined Cases C-71/11 and C-99/11, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 19 April 2012.Google Scholar
X, Y and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston), Joined Cases C-199/12, C-200/12 and C-201/12, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 11 July 2013.Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2011 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany), Kashayar Khavand v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Case C-563/10), ‘Removal’.Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 24 March 2011 (References for preliminary rulings from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Germany), Federal Republic of Germany v. Y (Case C-71/11) and Federal Republic of Germany v. Z (Case C-99/11), ‘Joining’ [Beschluss des Präsidenten des Gerichtshofs vom 24. März 2011, ‘Verbindung’ in der Rechtssache C-71/11 und in der Rechtssache C-99/11].Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 15 April 2016 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, Germany), Federal Commissioner for Asylum Affairs v. N (Case C-150/15), ‘Removal’ [Beschluss des Präsidenten des Gerichtshofs 15. April 2016 ‘Streichung’ In der Rechtssache C‑150/15].Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany) lodged on 1 December 2010, Kashayar Khavand v. Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-563/10).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 18 February 2011, Federal Republic of Germany v. Y (Case C-71/11).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 2 March 2011, Federal Republic of Germany v. Z (Case C-99/11).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012, Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel v. X (Case C-199/12).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 March 2015, Federal Commissioner for Asylum Affairs v. N (Case C-150/15).Google Scholar
Salahadin Abdulla and Others v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Joined Cases C-175/08, C-176/08, C-178/08 and C-179/08, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 2 March 2010.Google Scholar
Nawras Bolbol v. Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal, Case C-31/09, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 17 June 2010.Google Scholar
Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. B and D, Joined Cases C-57/09 and C-101/09, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 9 November 2010.Google Scholar
Federal Republic of Germany v. Y and Z, Joined Cases C-71/11 and C-99/11, Court of Justice of the European Union, 5 September 2012.Google Scholar
X, Y and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel, Joined Cases C-199/12, C-200/12 and C-201/12, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 7 November 2013.Google Scholar
Mohammad Ferooz Qurbani, Case C-481/13, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 17 July 2014.Google Scholar
A, B, C v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, Joined Cases C‑148/13 to C‑150/13, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 2 December 2014.Google Scholar
Federal Republic of Germany v. Y and Z (Opinion of Advocate General Bot), Joined Cases C-71/11 and C-99/11, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 19 April 2012.Google Scholar
X, Y and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston), Joined Cases C-199/12, C-200/12 and C-201/12, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 11 July 2013.Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2011 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany), Kashayar Khavand v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Case C-563/10), ‘Removal’.Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 24 March 2011 (References for preliminary rulings from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Germany), Federal Republic of Germany v. Y (Case C-71/11) and Federal Republic of Germany v. Z (Case C-99/11), ‘Joining’ [Beschluss des Präsidenten des Gerichtshofs vom 24. März 2011, ‘Verbindung’ in der Rechtssache C-71/11 und in der Rechtssache C-99/11].Google Scholar
Order of the President of the Court of 15 April 2016 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, Germany), Federal Commissioner for Asylum Affairs v. N (Case C-150/15), ‘Removal’ [Beschluss des Präsidenten des Gerichtshofs 15. April 2016 ‘Streichung’ In der Rechtssache C‑150/15].Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany) lodged on 1 December 2010, Kashayar Khavand v. Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-563/10).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 18 February 2011, Federal Republic of Germany v. Y (Case C-71/11).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 2 March 2011, Federal Republic of Germany v. Z (Case C-99/11).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012, Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel v. X (Case C-199/12).Google Scholar
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 March 2015, Federal Commissioner for Asylum Affairs v. N (Case C-150/15).Google Scholar
CC, décision no. 93–325 DC du 12 août 1993.Google Scholar
CC, décision no. 97–389 DC du 22 avril 1997.Google Scholar
CE, 23 juin 1997, 171858, Ourbih.Google Scholar
CE, 23 août 2006, 272679, Olena.Google Scholar
CE, 27 juillet 2012, 342552, O.A.Google Scholar
CE, 27 juillet 2012, 349824.Google Scholar
CE, 17 juin 2016, 391534.Google Scholar
CRR 17 décembre 1993, Koloskov, Documentation réfugiés no. 245, cited in Virginie Fraissinier-Amiot (2011) ‘Les homosexuels étrangers et le droit d’asile en France: un octroi en demi-teinte’, 27(2) Revue française de droit administratif 291–300 at 293.Google Scholar
CRR 12 mai 1999, 328310, Djellal.Google Scholar
CRR 22 mai 2000 340068, M. E.Google Scholar
CRR 4 octobre 2000, 330627, M. M.Google Scholar
CRR 6 février 2001, 359001, M. B.Google Scholar
CRR 29 juin 2001, 367645, M. K.Google Scholar
CRR 13 septembre 2001, 379319, M. N.Google Scholar
CRR 23 mai 2002, 388492, M. K.Google Scholar
CRR 23 juillet 2002, 394788.Google Scholar
CRR 26 novembre 2002, 402381, M. T.Google Scholar
CRR 12 octobre 2004, 483808, M. A.Google Scholar
CRR 25 mars 2005, 513547, Mlle G.Google Scholar
CRR 12 septembre 2005, 498570, Mme. AGB.Google Scholar
CRR 12 mai 2006, 555672, MS.Google Scholar
CRR 2 mars 2007, 578257 S.Google Scholar
CRR 18 mai 2007, 589676 D.Google Scholar
CNDA 11 avril 2008, 571886 G.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 mai 2008, 605398 H.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er juillet 2008, 571904, K.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 juillet 2009, 634565/08015025, C.Google Scholar
CNDA 3 novembre 2010, 09018078 O.Google Scholar
CNDA 10 janvier 2011, 09012710 C+, M. N.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er mars 2011, 09023968 C, M. I.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 mars 2011, 10002367 M.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er juin 2011, 10015959 C, Mlle N.Google Scholar
CNDA 24 juin 2011, 10025142 C, M. V.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 juillet 2011, 11002234 C, M. K.Google Scholar
CNDA 11 juillet 2011, 10020448 C, M. M.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 juillet 2011, 09004056 C, M. B.Google Scholar
CNDA 3 novembre 2011, 11010972 C, M. A.Google Scholar
CNDA 21 novembre 2011, 11010494 C, Mlle M.Google Scholar
CNDA 28 novembre 2011, 10019216 C, M. C.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 mai 2012, 11009260 C, M. D.Google Scholar
CNDA 18 octobre 2012, 12013647 C, M. B. N.Google Scholar
CNDA 12 février 2013, 11029513 C, M. M.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 novembre 2013, 13007332 C, M. F.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 novembre 2013, 13018825 C, M. A.Google Scholar
CNDA 10 juillet 2014, 13025005 C, M. J-J.Google Scholar
CNDA 19 décembre 2014, 14017576 C, Mme W.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 octobre 2015, 15006472 C+, M. H.Google Scholar
CNDA 18 mars 2016, 15031443 C, M. K.Google Scholar
CNDA 14 juin 2016, 15030258 C, Mme E.Google Scholar
CNDA 27 septembre 2016, 15004721 C, Mme T.Google Scholar
CC, décision no. 93–325 DC du 12 août 1993.Google Scholar
CC, décision no. 97–389 DC du 22 avril 1997.Google Scholar
CE, 23 juin 1997, 171858, Ourbih.Google Scholar
CE, 23 août 2006, 272679, Olena.Google Scholar
CE, 27 juillet 2012, 342552, O.A.Google Scholar
CE, 27 juillet 2012, 349824.Google Scholar
CE, 17 juin 2016, 391534.Google Scholar
CRR 17 décembre 1993, Koloskov, Documentation réfugiés no. 245, cited in Virginie Fraissinier-Amiot (2011) ‘Les homosexuels étrangers et le droit d’asile en France: un octroi en demi-teinte’, 27(2) Revue française de droit administratif 291–300 at 293.Google Scholar
CRR 12 mai 1999, 328310, Djellal.Google Scholar
CRR 22 mai 2000 340068, M. E.Google Scholar
CRR 4 octobre 2000, 330627, M. M.Google Scholar
CRR 6 février 2001, 359001, M. B.Google Scholar
CRR 29 juin 2001, 367645, M. K.Google Scholar
CRR 13 septembre 2001, 379319, M. N.Google Scholar
CRR 23 mai 2002, 388492, M. K.Google Scholar
CRR 23 juillet 2002, 394788.Google Scholar
CRR 26 novembre 2002, 402381, M. T.Google Scholar
CRR 12 octobre 2004, 483808, M. A.Google Scholar
CRR 25 mars 2005, 513547, Mlle G.Google Scholar
CRR 12 septembre 2005, 498570, Mme. AGB.Google Scholar
CRR 12 mai 2006, 555672, MS.Google Scholar
CRR 2 mars 2007, 578257 S.Google Scholar
CRR 18 mai 2007, 589676 D.Google Scholar
CNDA 11 avril 2008, 571886 G.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 mai 2008, 605398 H.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er juillet 2008, 571904, K.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 juillet 2009, 634565/08015025, C.Google Scholar
CNDA 3 novembre 2010, 09018078 O.Google Scholar
CNDA 10 janvier 2011, 09012710 C+, M. N.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er mars 2011, 09023968 C, M. I.Google Scholar
CNDA 7 mars 2011, 10002367 M.Google Scholar
CNDA 1er juin 2011, 10015959 C, Mlle N.Google Scholar
CNDA 24 juin 2011, 10025142 C, M. V.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 juillet 2011, 11002234 C, M. K.Google Scholar
CNDA 11 juillet 2011, 10020448 C, M. M.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 juillet 2011, 09004056 C, M. B.Google Scholar
CNDA 3 novembre 2011, 11010972 C, M. A.Google Scholar
CNDA 21 novembre 2011, 11010494 C, Mlle M.Google Scholar
CNDA 28 novembre 2011, 10019216 C, M. C.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 mai 2012, 11009260 C, M. D.Google Scholar
CNDA 18 octobre 2012, 12013647 C, M. B. N.Google Scholar
CNDA 12 février 2013, 11029513 C, M. M.Google Scholar
CNDA 4 novembre 2013, 13007332 C, M. F.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 novembre 2013, 13018825 C, M. A.Google Scholar
CNDA 10 juillet 2014, 13025005 C, M. J-J.Google Scholar
CNDA 19 décembre 2014, 14017576 C, Mme W.Google Scholar
CNDA 29 octobre 2015, 15006472 C+, M. H.Google Scholar
CNDA 18 mars 2016, 15031443 C, M. K.Google Scholar
CNDA 14 juin 2016, 15030258 C, Mme E.Google Scholar
CNDA 27 septembre 2016, 15004721 C, Mme T.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 54, 341, Urteil vom 02.07.1980.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 74, 51, Urteil vom 26.11.1986.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 76, 143, Beschluss vom 01.07.1987.Google Scholar
BverfGE 80, 315, Urteil vom 10.07.1989.Google Scholar
BVerwG Urteil vom 15.3.1988, 9 C 278/86.Google Scholar
BverwG, Urteil vom 17.10.1989, 9 C 25/89.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 88, 367, Urteil vom 23.7.1991, 9 C 154/90.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 92, 278, Urteil vom 13.05.1993, 9 C 49/92.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 95, 42, Urteil vom 18.01.1994, 9 C 48/92.Google Scholar
BVerwG Urteile vom 20.2.2013, 10 C 20.12; 10 C 21.12; 10 C 22.12; 10 C 23.12.Google Scholar
Hess. VGH, Urteil vom 21.08.1986, 10 OE 69/83.Google Scholar
VGH München, Beschluss vom 12.11.1998, 19 ZB 98.33916.Google Scholar
OVG Münster, Beschluss vom 23.11.2010, 13 A 1013/09.A.Google Scholar
VGH Baden Württemberg, Urteile vom 7.3.2013, A 9 S 1872/12; A 9 S 1873/12.Google Scholar
VG Wiesbaden, Urteil vom 26.4.1983, IV/I E 06244/81, cited from Maryellen Fullerton (1990) ‘Persecution Due to Membership in a Particular Social Group: Jurisprudence in the Federal Republic of Germany’, 4 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 381–444 at 408–410.Google Scholar
VG Ansbach, Urteil vom 11.10.2000, AN 3 K 00.31628.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Urteil vom 16.7.2002, W 7 K 01.30170.Google Scholar
VG Bremen, Urteil vom 28.4.2006, 7 K 632/05.A.Google Scholar
VG Köln, Urteil vom 8.9.2006, 18 K 9030/03.A.Google Scholar
VG München, Urteil vom 30.1.2007, M 21 K 04.51494.Google Scholar
VG Münster, Beschluss vom 4.7.2007, 9 L 381/07.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 21.2.2008, 11 K 2432/07.A.Google Scholar
VG Chemnitz, Urteil vom 11.7.2008, A 2 K 304/06.Google Scholar
VG Ansbach, Urteil vom 21.8.2008, AN 18 K 08.30201.Google Scholar
VG Neustadt/Weinstraße, Urteil vom 8.9.2008, 3 K 753/07.NW.Google Scholar
VG Regensburg, Urteil vom 15.9.2008, RN 8 K 08.30020.Google Scholar
VG Berlin, Urteil vom 3.12.2008, 23 X 30.06.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 11.3.2009, 5 K 1875/08.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 14.1.2010, 11 K 6778/09.A.Google Scholar
VG Sigmaringen, Urteil vom 26.4.2010, A 1 K 1911/09.Google Scholar
VG Trier, Beschluss vom 9.9.2010, 1 L 928-10.TR.Google Scholar
VG Frankfurt/Oder, Urteil vom 11.11.2010, VG 4 K 772/10.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 23.3.2012, 13 K 1217/11.A.Google Scholar
VG Berlin, Beschluss vom 29.10.2013, 34 L 89.13 A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 13.12.2013, 13 K 3683/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Potsdam, Urteil vom 27.2.2014, VG 6 K 435/13.A.Google Scholar
VG München, Urteil vom 24.4.2014, M 4 K 13.30114.Google Scholar
VG Potsdam, Urteil vom 13.5.2014, VG 6 K 3802/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Beschluss vom 21.8.2014, W 1 S 14.30384.Google Scholar
VG Augsburg, Urteil vom 31.10.2014, Au 3 K 14.30222.Google Scholar
VG Aachen, Urteil vom 12.12.2014, 2 K 1477/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Saarland, Urteil vom 23.1.2015, 5 K 534/13.Google Scholar
VG Braunschweig, Urteil vom 2.9.2015, 7 A 68/15.Google Scholar
VG Frankfurt/Oder, Urteil vom 19.11.2015, 4 K 109912.A.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Urteil vom 1.7.2016, W 6 K 15.30116.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 54, 341, Urteil vom 02.07.1980.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 74, 51, Urteil vom 26.11.1986.Google Scholar
BVerfGE 76, 143, Beschluss vom 01.07.1987.Google Scholar
BverfGE 80, 315, Urteil vom 10.07.1989.Google Scholar
BVerwG Urteil vom 15.3.1988, 9 C 278/86.Google Scholar
BverwG, Urteil vom 17.10.1989, 9 C 25/89.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 88, 367, Urteil vom 23.7.1991, 9 C 154/90.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 92, 278, Urteil vom 13.05.1993, 9 C 49/92.Google Scholar
BVerwGE 95, 42, Urteil vom 18.01.1994, 9 C 48/92.Google Scholar
BVerwG Urteile vom 20.2.2013, 10 C 20.12; 10 C 21.12; 10 C 22.12; 10 C 23.12.Google Scholar
Hess. VGH, Urteil vom 21.08.1986, 10 OE 69/83.Google Scholar
VGH München, Beschluss vom 12.11.1998, 19 ZB 98.33916.Google Scholar
OVG Münster, Beschluss vom 23.11.2010, 13 A 1013/09.A.Google Scholar
VGH Baden Württemberg, Urteile vom 7.3.2013, A 9 S 1872/12; A 9 S 1873/12.Google Scholar
VG Wiesbaden, Urteil vom 26.4.1983, IV/I E 06244/81, cited from Maryellen Fullerton (1990) ‘Persecution Due to Membership in a Particular Social Group: Jurisprudence in the Federal Republic of Germany’, 4 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 381–444 at 408–410.Google Scholar
VG Ansbach, Urteil vom 11.10.2000, AN 3 K 00.31628.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Urteil vom 16.7.2002, W 7 K 01.30170.Google Scholar
VG Bremen, Urteil vom 28.4.2006, 7 K 632/05.A.Google Scholar
VG Köln, Urteil vom 8.9.2006, 18 K 9030/03.A.Google Scholar
VG München, Urteil vom 30.1.2007, M 21 K 04.51494.Google Scholar
VG Münster, Beschluss vom 4.7.2007, 9 L 381/07.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 21.2.2008, 11 K 2432/07.A.Google Scholar
VG Chemnitz, Urteil vom 11.7.2008, A 2 K 304/06.Google Scholar
VG Ansbach, Urteil vom 21.8.2008, AN 18 K 08.30201.Google Scholar
VG Neustadt/Weinstraße, Urteil vom 8.9.2008, 3 K 753/07.NW.Google Scholar
VG Regensburg, Urteil vom 15.9.2008, RN 8 K 08.30020.Google Scholar
VG Berlin, Urteil vom 3.12.2008, 23 X 30.06.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 11.3.2009, 5 K 1875/08.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 14.1.2010, 11 K 6778/09.A.Google Scholar
VG Sigmaringen, Urteil vom 26.4.2010, A 1 K 1911/09.Google Scholar
VG Trier, Beschluss vom 9.9.2010, 1 L 928-10.TR.Google Scholar
VG Frankfurt/Oder, Urteil vom 11.11.2010, VG 4 K 772/10.A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 23.3.2012, 13 K 1217/11.A.Google Scholar
VG Berlin, Beschluss vom 29.10.2013, 34 L 89.13 A.Google Scholar
VG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 13.12.2013, 13 K 3683/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Potsdam, Urteil vom 27.2.2014, VG 6 K 435/13.A.Google Scholar
VG München, Urteil vom 24.4.2014, M 4 K 13.30114.Google Scholar
VG Potsdam, Urteil vom 13.5.2014, VG 6 K 3802/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Beschluss vom 21.8.2014, W 1 S 14.30384.Google Scholar
VG Augsburg, Urteil vom 31.10.2014, Au 3 K 14.30222.Google Scholar
VG Aachen, Urteil vom 12.12.2014, 2 K 1477/13.A.Google Scholar
VG Saarland, Urteil vom 23.1.2015, 5 K 534/13.Google Scholar
VG Braunschweig, Urteil vom 2.9.2015, 7 A 68/15.Google Scholar
VG Frankfurt/Oder, Urteil vom 19.11.2015, 4 K 109912.A.Google Scholar
VG Würzburg, Urteil vom 1.7.2016, W 6 K 15.30116.Google Scholar
Re GJ, Refugee Appeal No. 1312/93, New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority, 30 August 1995.Google Scholar
Refugee Appeal No. 74665/03, New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority, 7 July 2004.Google Scholar
Re GJ, Refugee Appeal No. 1312/93, New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority, 30 August 1995.Google Scholar
Refugee Appeal No. 74665/03, New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority, 7 July 2004.Google Scholar
STS 7098/2005 de 30 de noviembre de 2005.Google Scholar
STS 2331/2006 de 21 de abril de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 4511/2003 de 29 de septiembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 8650/2006 de 14 de diciembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 8248/2006 de 22 de diciembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 5650/2007 de 25 de julio de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 6674/2007 de 4 de octubre de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 8251/2007 de 13 de diciembre de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 5265/2005 de 28 de noviembre de 2008.Google Scholar
STS 3901/2011 de 16 de junio de 2011.Google Scholar
STS 5907/2012 de 21 de septiembre de 2012.Google Scholar
STS 1957/2013 de 27 de marzo de 2013.Google Scholar
STS 1971/2013 de 27 de marzo de 2013.Google Scholar
STS 376/2014 de 12 de febrero de 2014.Google Scholar
STS 4492/2015 de 2 de noviembre de 2015.Google Scholar
STS 124/2016 de 25 de enero de 2016.Google Scholar
STS 3847/2016 de 18 de julio de 2016.Google Scholar
SAN 3500/1998 de 29 de septiembre del 1998.Google Scholar
SAN 4388/1998 de 6 de noviembre del 1998.Google Scholar
SAN 6483/1999 de 29 de octubre del 1999.Google Scholar
SAN 1890/2001 de 23 de marzo de 2001.Google Scholar
SAN 4464/2002 de 12 de julio de 2002.Google Scholar
SAN 2628/2003 de 11 de noviembre de 2003.Google Scholar
SAN 1790/2005 de 30 de marzo de 2005.Google Scholar
SAN 5515/2006 de 30 de noviembre 2006.Google Scholar
SAN 200/2007 de 30 de enero de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 2491/2007 de 23 de mayo de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 3139/2007 de 4 de julio de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 5321/2008 de 7 de noviembre de 2008.Google Scholar
SAN 5372/2008 de 10 de diciembre de 2008.Google Scholar
SAN 1003/2009 de 25 de febrero de 2009.Google Scholar
SAN 379/2011 de 31 de enero de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 842/2011 de 18 de febrero de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 1584/2011 de 24 de marzo de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 1832/2014 de 30 de abril de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2340/2013 de 12 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2523/2014 de 18 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2122/2014 de 22 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2530/2014 de 30 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2533/2014 de 30 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2793/2014 de 12 de junio de 2014.Google Scholar
STS 7098/2005 de 30 de noviembre de 2005.Google Scholar
STS 2331/2006 de 21 de abril de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 4511/2003 de 29 de septiembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 8650/2006 de 14 de diciembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 8248/2006 de 22 de diciembre de 2006.Google Scholar
STS 5650/2007 de 25 de julio de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 6674/2007 de 4 de octubre de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 8251/2007 de 13 de diciembre de 2007.Google Scholar
STS 5265/2005 de 28 de noviembre de 2008.Google Scholar
STS 3901/2011 de 16 de junio de 2011.Google Scholar
STS 5907/2012 de 21 de septiembre de 2012.Google Scholar
STS 1957/2013 de 27 de marzo de 2013.Google Scholar
STS 1971/2013 de 27 de marzo de 2013.Google Scholar
STS 376/2014 de 12 de febrero de 2014.Google Scholar
STS 4492/2015 de 2 de noviembre de 2015.Google Scholar
STS 124/2016 de 25 de enero de 2016.Google Scholar
STS 3847/2016 de 18 de julio de 2016.Google Scholar
SAN 3500/1998 de 29 de septiembre del 1998.Google Scholar
SAN 4388/1998 de 6 de noviembre del 1998.Google Scholar
SAN 6483/1999 de 29 de octubre del 1999.Google Scholar
SAN 1890/2001 de 23 de marzo de 2001.Google Scholar
SAN 4464/2002 de 12 de julio de 2002.Google Scholar
SAN 2628/2003 de 11 de noviembre de 2003.Google Scholar
SAN 1790/2005 de 30 de marzo de 2005.Google Scholar
SAN 5515/2006 de 30 de noviembre 2006.Google Scholar
SAN 200/2007 de 30 de enero de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 2491/2007 de 23 de mayo de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 3139/2007 de 4 de julio de 2007.Google Scholar
SAN 5321/2008 de 7 de noviembre de 2008.Google Scholar
SAN 5372/2008 de 10 de diciembre de 2008.Google Scholar
SAN 1003/2009 de 25 de febrero de 2009.Google Scholar
SAN 379/2011 de 31 de enero de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 842/2011 de 18 de febrero de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 1584/2011 de 24 de marzo de 2011.Google Scholar
SAN 1832/2014 de 30 de abril de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2340/2013 de 12 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2523/2014 de 18 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2122/2014 de 22 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2530/2014 de 30 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2533/2014 de 30 de mayo de 2014.Google Scholar
SAN 2793/2014 de 12 de junio de 2014.Google Scholar
HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2010] UKSC 31, United Kingdom: Supreme Court, 7 July 2010.Google Scholar
RT (Zimbabwe) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2012] UKSC 38, United Kingdom: Supreme Court, 25 July 2012.Google Scholar
Mendis v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Secretary of State for the Home Department, [1989] Imm AR 6, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 17 June 1988.Google Scholar
Ahmad and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [1990] Imm AR 61, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 6 October 1989.Google Scholar
Danian v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appeal), [2000] Imm AR 96, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 28 October 1999.Google Scholar
Ahmed (Iftikhar) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2000] INLR 1, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 5 November 1999.Google Scholar
Demirkaya v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1999] Imm AR 498, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 23 July 1999.Google Scholar
SW (lesbians – HJ and HT applied) Jamaica v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, UK, CG [2011] UKUT 00251(IAC), United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), 24 June 2011.Google Scholar
HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2010] UKSC 31, United Kingdom: Supreme Court, 7 July 2010.Google Scholar
RT (Zimbabwe) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2012] UKSC 38, United Kingdom: Supreme Court, 25 July 2012.Google Scholar
Mendis v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Secretary of State for the Home Department, [1989] Imm AR 6, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 17 June 1988.Google Scholar
Ahmad and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [1990] Imm AR 61, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 6 October 1989.Google Scholar
Danian v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appeal), [2000] Imm AR 96, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 28 October 1999.Google Scholar
Ahmed (Iftikhar) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2000] INLR 1, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 5 November 1999.Google Scholar
Demirkaya v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1999] Imm AR 498, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 23 July 1999.Google Scholar
SW (lesbians – HJ and HT applied) Jamaica v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, UK, CG [2011] UKUT 00251(IAC), United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), 24 June 2011.Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), United States Supreme Court, 30 June 1986.Google Scholar
Matter of Acosta, 19 I. & N. Dec. 11 (B.I.A. 1985), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 1 March 1985.Google Scholar
In re Toboso-Alfonso, 20 I. & N. Dec. 819 (B.I.A. 1990), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 12 March 1990.Google Scholar
In re Fauziya Kasinga, 21 I. & N. Dec. 357 (B.I.A. 1996), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 13 June 1996.Google Scholar
Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 7 February 2014.Google Scholar
Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 208 (BIA 2014), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 7 February 2014.Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), United States Supreme Court, 30 June 1986.Google Scholar
Matter of Acosta, 19 I. & N. Dec. 11 (B.I.A. 1985), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 1 March 1985.Google Scholar
In re Toboso-Alfonso, 20 I. & N. Dec. 819 (B.I.A. 1990), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 12 March 1990.Google Scholar
In re Fauziya Kasinga, 21 I. & N. Dec. 357 (B.I.A. 1996), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 13 June 1996.Google Scholar
Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 7 February 2014.Google Scholar
Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 208 (BIA 2014), United States Board of Immigration Appeals, 7 February 2014.Google Scholar
All online sources were last accessed on 25 April 2021.Google Scholar
Akin, Deniz (2015) ‘Assessing Sexual Orientation-Based Persecution – A Closer Look at the Norwegian Practices of Asylum Evaluation of Gay and Lesbian Claimants’, 1 Föreningen Lambda Nordica 19–42.Google Scholar
Akin, Deniz (2017) ‘Queer Asylum Seekers: Translating Sexuality in Norway’, 43(3) Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 458–474.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander (2003) ‘Protected Characteristics and Social Perceptions: An Analysis of the Meaning of “Membership of a Particular Social Group”’, in Feller, Erika, Türk, Volker and Nicholson, Frances (eds.) Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–311.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (2008) Love, Hate and the Law: Decriminalizing Homosexuality, London: Amnesty International Publications, www.amnesty.org/en/documents/POL30/003/2008/en.Google Scholar
Anker, Deborah (2002) ‘Boundaries in the Field of Human Rights: Refugee Law, Gender and the Human Rights Paradigm’, 15 Harvard Human Rights Journal 133–154.Google Scholar
Anker, Deborah and Ardalan, Sabi (2012) ‘Escalating Persecution of Gays and Refugee Protection: Comment on Queer Cases Make Bad Law’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 529–557.Google Scholar
Annicchino, Pasquale (2015) ‘The Persecution of Religious and LGBTI Minorities and Asylum Law: Recent Trends in the Adjudication of European Supranational Courts’, 21(3) European Public Law 571–590.Google Scholar
Arbel, Efrat, Dauvergne, Catherine and Millbank, Jenni (2014) ‘Introduction’, in Arbel, Efrat, Dauvergne, Catherine and Millbank, Jenni (eds.) Gender in Refugee Law: From the Margins to the Centre, London: Routledge, 1–16.Google Scholar
Arbour, Louise (2008) ‘Message from Louise Arbour: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights’, 27(3) Refugee Studies Quarterly 13–15.Google Scholar
Astaix, Anthony (2012) ‘Réfugié: le statut doit être accordé en raison de persécutions religieuses’, Dalloz Actualité 14 September 2012.Google Scholar
Bank, Roland (2016) ‘Refugee Law Jurisprudence from Germany and Human Rights: Cutting Edge or Chilling Effect?’, in Burson, Bruce and Cantor, David (eds.) Human Rights and the Refugee Definition – Comparative Legal Practice and Theory, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 156–179.Google Scholar
Battjes, Hemme (2013) ‘Accommodation: Sur Place Claims and the Accommodation Requirement’, in Spijkerboer, Thomas (ed.) Fleeing Homophobia – Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Asylum, London: Routledge, 82–97.Google Scholar
Bauer, Greta and Brennan, David (2013) ‘The Problem with “Behavioral Bisexuality”: Assessing Sexual Orientation in Survey Research’, 13(2) Journal of Bisexuality 148–164.Google Scholar
Berg, Laurie and Millbank, Jenni (2009) ‘Constructing the Personal Narratives of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Asylum Claimants’, 22(2) Journal of Refugee Studies 195–223.Google Scholar
Berg, Laurie and Millbank, Jenni (2013) ‘Developing a Jurisprudence of Transgender Particular Social Group’, in Spijkerboer, Thomas (ed.) Fleeing Homophobia: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Asylum, London: Routledge, 121–153.Google Scholar
Berlit, Uwe, Dörig, Harald and Storey, Hugo (2015) ‘Credibility Assessment in Claims Based on Persecution for Reasons of Religious Conversion and Homosexuality: A Practitioners Approach’, 27(4) International Journal of Refugee Law 649–666.Google Scholar
Broberg, Morten and Niels, Fenger (2014) Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Budd, Michael Carl (2009) Mistakes in Identity: Sexual Orientation and Credibility in the Asylum Process, MA thesis, The American University in Cairo [unpublished].Google Scholar
Bundestags-Drucksache 17/1505, ‘Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Ulla Jelpke, Jan Korte, Dr. Barabara Höll, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE: Aufnahme von Flüchtlingen aus dem Iran und Umgang mit homosexuellen Flüchtlingen’, Deutscher Bundestag 17. Wahlperiode, 2010.Google Scholar
Buxton, Richard (2012) ‘A History from across the Pond’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 391–406.Google Scholar
Cantor, David (2014) Introductory Remarks, ICJ Second Expert Roundtable on Asylum Claims Based on Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, Friday 3 October 2014, London.Google Scholar
de Castro Sánchez, Claribel (2015) ‘La condición sexual como razón de la concesión de asilo. ¿Una nueva puerta de entrada a Europa? Reflexiones a la luz de la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la UE de 7 de noviembre de 2013, Minister Voor Inmigratie en Asiel/X, Y y Z. (RI §415704)’, 35 Revista General de Derecho Europeo 3–25.Google Scholar
Cheikh Ali, Hana, Querton, Christel and Soulard, Élodie (2012) Gender Related Asylum Claims in Europe – A Comparative Analysis of Law, Policies and Practice Focusing on Women in Nine EU Member States (‘GENSEN Report’). Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Department of Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs.Google Scholar
Chelvan, S. (2011) ‘Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love)’, 25(1) Journal on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law 56–66.Google Scholar
Chetail, Vincent (2014) ‘Are Refugee Rights Human Rights? An Unorthodox Questioning of the Relations between Refugee Law and Human Rights Law’, in Rubio-Marin, Ruth (ed.) Human Rights and Immigration, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–72.Google Scholar
Chetail, Vincent (2016) ‘The Common European Asylum System: Bric-à-brac or System?’, in Chetail, Vincent, de Bruycker, Philippe and Maiani, Francesco (eds.) Reforming the Common European Asylum System – The New European Refugee Law, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 3–38.Google Scholar
Choi, Venice (2010) ‘Living Discreetly: A Catch 22 in Refugee Status Determinations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation’, 36(1) Brooklyn Journal of International Law 241–263.Google Scholar
Cores, Arsenio (2011) Fleeing Homophobia Questionnaire: Best Practices on the (Legal) Position of LGBT Asylum Seekers in the EU Member States – Spain, Fleeing Homophobia Project, www.rechten.vu.nl/nl/Images/Spain_questionnaire_tcm247-240407.pdf.Google Scholar
Costello, Cathryn and Hancox, Emily (2014) ‘The UK, the Common European Asylum System and EU Immigration Law’, Policy Primer, Oxford: The Migration Observatory, www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/PolicyPrimer-UK_EU_Asylum_Law.pdf.Google Scholar
Council of Australian Law Deans (2005) CALD Statement on the Nature of Research (May and October 2005), https://cald.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/cald-statement-on-the-nature-of-legal-research-20051.pdf.Google Scholar
Cowen, Tim, Stella, Francesca, Magahy, Kirsty, Strauss, Kendra and Morton, James (2011) ‘Sanctuary, Safety and Solidarity: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Scotland’, Glasgow: Equality Network, BEMIS and GRAMNe, online: University of Glasgow, www.equality-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Sanctuary-Safety-and-Solidarity.pdf.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine (2008) Making People Illegal: What Globalization Means for Migration and Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine (2013) ‘Refugee Law as Perpetual Crisis’, in Juss, Satvinder and Harvey, Colin (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Refugee Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 13–30.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine (2016) ‘Toward a New Framework for Understanding Political Opinion’, 37 Michigan Journal of International Law 243–298.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine and Millbank, Jenni (2003) ‘Before the High Court: Applicants S396/2002 and S395/2002, a Gay Refugee Couple from Bangladesh’, 25 Sydney Law Review 97–124.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine and Millbank, Jenni (2010) ‘Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law’, 73(1) The Modern Law Review 57–88.Google Scholar
Dawson, Jasmine and Gerber, Paula (2017) ‘Assessing the Refugee Claims of LGBTI People: Is the DSSH Model Useful for Determining Claims by Women for Asylum Based on Sexual Orientation?’, 29(2) International Journal of Refugee Law 292–322.Google Scholar
Defossez, Alexandre (2014) ‘Arrêt “X, Y et Z”: les homosexuels persécutés dans leur pays d’origine peuvent-ils bénéficier du statut de “réfugié”?’, 206 Journal de droit européen 54–55.Google Scholar
Delouvin, Patrick (2000) ‘The Evolution of Asylum in France’, 13(1) Journal of Refugee Studies 61–73.Google Scholar
Díaz Lafuente, José (2014) ‘El Derecho de Asilo por Motivos de Orientación Sexual e Identidad de Género’, 89 Revista de Derecho Público 345–388.Google Scholar
Díaz Lafuente, José (2014) ‘Estudio de la doctrina jurisprudencial española sobre la protección internacional por motivos de orientación sexual e identidad de género’, Libertad de circulación, asilo y refugio en la Unión Europea 69–92.Google Scholar
Díaz Lafuente, José (2014) Refugio y asilo por motivos de orientación sexual y/o identidad de género en el ordenamiento constitucional español, doctoral thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Valencia.Google Scholar
Dienelt, Klaus (2008) ‘Vermeidungsverhalten zur Abwendung von Verfolgung – Vereinbarkeit mit der Qualifkationsrichtlinie’, Nachrichten zum Schwerpunkt Asylrecht, Migrationsrecht.net, www.migrationsrecht.net/nachrichten-asylrecht/1178-eu-qualifikationsrichtlinie-rl-200483eg-religion-verfolgung.html.Google Scholar
Dodet-Cauphy, Isabelle (1999) ‘La difficile reconnaissance du droit d’asile constitutionnel. Commentaire de la loi du 11 mai 1998 relative à l’entrée et au séjour des étrangers en France et au droit d’asile’, 15(3) Revue française de droit administratif 469–484.Google Scholar
Dolk, Klaudia and Schwandtner, Andreas (2007) ‘Homosexualität und (Abschiebungs)schutz in Deutschland’, 7–8 amnesty international – asyl-info 4–15.Google Scholar
Dörig, Harald (2014) ‘German Courts and Their Understanding of the Common European Asylum System (Opinion)’, 25(4) International Journal of Refugee Law 768–778.Google Scholar
Drywood, Eleanor (2014) ‘Who’s In and Who’s Out? The Court’s Emerging Case Law on the Definition of a Refugee’, 51 Common Market Law Review 1093–1124.Google Scholar
Durieux, Jean-François (2013) ‘The Vanishing Refugee: How EU Asylum Law Blurs the Specificity of Refugee Protection’, in Lambert, Hélène, McAdam, Jane and Fullerton, Maryellen (eds.) The Global Reach of European Refugee Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 225–257.Google Scholar
ECRE (2014) Agentes de Protección y Aplicación de la Alternativa de Protección Interna – Informe de País España, APAIPA, www.refworld.org.es/pdfid/543bc5424.pdf.Google Scholar
ECRE (2016) ECRE Comments on the Commission Proposal for a Qualification Regulation COM (2016) 466, www.ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ECRE-Comments-EU-Asylum-Agency_July-2016-final_2.pdf.Google Scholar
ECRE (2017) ‘UK Home Office Guideline: Afghan Gay Asylum-Seekers Expected to Conceal Their Sexual Orientation to Avoid Persecution When Sent Back’, News, 3 March 2017, www.ecre.org/uk-home-office-guideline-afghan-gay-asylum-seekers-expected-to-conceal-their-sexual-orientation-to-avoid-persecution-when-sent-back.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alice (2003) ‘Age and Gender Dimensions in International Refugee Law’, in Feller, Erika, Türk, Volker and Nicholson, Frances (eds.) Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 46–80.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alice (2005) ‘Human Rights, Refugees, and the Right “To Enjoy” Asylum’, 17(2) International Journal of Refugee Law 293–330.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alice (2012) ‘Distinction, Discretion, Discrimination: The New Frontiers of Gender-Related Claims to Asylum’, paper delivered at the Gender, Migration and Human Rights Conference at the European University Institute, Florence, Italy, 19 June 2012, www.refworld.org/docid/4ffd430c2.html.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alice (2014) ‘X, Y and Z: The “A, B, C” of Claims Based on Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity?’, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), International Commission of Jurists: Expert Roundtable on Asylum Claims Based on Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity or Expression Brussels, 27 June 2014, www.refworld.org/docid/53bb99984.html.Google Scholar
Testaut, Escribano, Pedro and Margarita Diana Fernández Sánchez (n.d.) Doctrina jurisprudencial sobre protección internacional (asilo, y refugio, protección subsidiaria y autorización de permanencia en España por razones humanitarias) 2009–2012. Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, Gabinete Técnico.Google Scholar
European Commission (2015) ‘Common European Asylum System’, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/asylum/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission (2016) ‘Completing the Reform of the Common European Asylum System: Towards an Efficient, Fair and Humane Asylum Policy’, European Commission – press release, Brussels, 13 July 2016, together with proposed texts for regulations, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_16_2433.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Nuno (2015) ‘Portuguese Refugee Law in the European Context: The Case of Sexuality-Based Claims’, 27(3) International Journal of Refugee Law 411–432.Google Scholar
Foster, Michelle (2007) International Refugee Law and Socio-Economic Rights: Refuge from Deprivation, Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Michelle (2012) The ‘Ground with the Least Clarity’: A Comparative Study of Jurisprudential Developments relating to ‘Membership of a Particular Social Group’, UNHCR Division of International Protection, Geneva, August 2012, PPLA/2012/02.Google Scholar
Foster, Michelle (2014) ‘Why We Are Not There Yet: The Particular Challenge of “Particular Social Group”’, in Arbel, Efrat, Dauvergne, Catherine and Millbank, Jenni (eds.) Gender in Refugee Law: From the Margins to the Centre, London: Routledge, 17–45.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1976) Histoire de la sexualité I: La volonté de savoir, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fouquet-Lapar, Thomas and Tercero, Flor (2011) Fleeing Homophobia Questionnaire Best Practices on the (Legal) Position of LGBT Asylum Seekers in the EU Member States – France, Fleeing Homophobia Project, www.rechten.vu.nl/nl/Images/France_FINAL_tcm247-240411.pdf.Google Scholar
Fraissinier-Amiot, Virginie (2011) ‘Les homosexuels étrangers et le droit d’asile en France: un octroi en demi-teinte’, 27(2) Revue française de droit administratif 291–300.Google Scholar
Frank, David John (2012) ‘Making Sense of LGBT Asylum Claims: Change and Variation in Institutional Contexts’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 485–495.Google Scholar
Fullerton, Maryellen (1990) ‘Persecution Due to Membership in a Particular Social Group: Jurisprudence in the Federal Republic of Germany’, 4 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 381–444.Google Scholar
Fullerton, Maryellen (1993) ‘A Comparative Look at Refugee Status Based on Persecution Due to Membership in a Particular Social Group’, 26(3) Cornell International Law Journal 505–563.Google Scholar
Chambers, Garden Court (2010) ‘Future Behaviour and the Refugee Convention’, Free Movement Blog, 12 July 2010, www.freemovement.org.uk/future-behaviour-and-the-refugee-convention.Google Scholar
Gay & Lesbian Alliance against Defamation (2016) Media Reference Guide (10th ed.), New York, October 2016.Google Scholar
Gil-Bazo, María-Teresa (2010) ‘“Thou Shalt Not Judge” … Spanish Judicial Decision-Making on Asylum and the Role of Judges in Interpreting the Law’, in: Guy Goodwin-Gil and Hélène Lambert (eds.) The Limits of Transnational Law – Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union, 107–124.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Geoff (2004) ‘Is Europe Living Up to Its Obligations to Refugees?’, 15(5) European Journal of International Law 963–987.Google Scholar
Global Consultations on International Protection (2003) Summary Conclusions: Membership of a Particular Social Group, adopted at the expert roundtable organized by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Institute of Humanitarian Law, San Remo, Italy, 6–8 September 2001, www.refworld.org/pdfid/470a33b40.pdf.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan (2012) ‘Asylum and the Concealment of Sexual Orientation: Where Not to Draw the Line’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 407–446.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy (1983) The Refugee in International Law (1st ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy (1996) The Refugee in International Law (2nd ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy (2014) ‘Editorial – The Dynamic of International Refugee Law’, 25(4) International Journal of Refugee Law 651–666.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy and Lambert, Hélène, eds. (2010) The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy and McAdam, Jane (2007) The Refugee in International Law (3rd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gorlick, Brian (2000) ‘Human Rights and Refugees: Enhancing Protection through International Human Rights Law’, New Issues in Refugee Research, working paper no. 30, www.refworld.org/docid/4ff581592.html.Google Scholar
Gossman, Patricia (2017) ‘Afghan LGBT Asylum Seekers in UK among Most Vulnerable – At Risk of Imprisonment, Violence If Deported to Afghanistan’, Human Rights Watch News, 26 February 2017, www.hrw.org/news/2017/02/26/afghan-lgbt-asylum-seekers-uk-among-most-vulnerable.Google Scholar
Grahl-Madsen, Atle (1966) The Status of Refugees in International Law – Volume I: Refugee Character, Leyden: A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Reagan (2017) ‘The Particular Social Group Requirement: How the Asylum Process Is Consistently Failing LGB Applicants and How an Evidentiary Standard of Self-Attestation Can Remedy These Failures’, 17 University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class 147–172.Google Scholar
Guild, Elspeth (2004) ‘Seeking Asylum: Storm Clouds between International Commitments and EU Legislative Measures’, 29(2) European Law Review 198–218.Google Scholar
Haines, Rodger, Hathaway, James and Foster, Michelle (2003) ‘Claims to Refugee Status based on Voluntary but Protected Actions – Discussion Paper No. 1, Advanced Refugee Law Workshop, International Association of Refugee Law Judges, Auckland, New Zealand, October 2002’, 15(3) International Journal of Refugee Law 430–443.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark A. and Wright, Ronald F. (2008) ‘Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions’, 96(1) California Law Review 63–122.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet (1993) ‘Reasoning about Sodomy: Act and Identity in and after Bowers v. Hardwick’, 79(7) Virginia Law Review 1721–1780.Google Scholar
Harvey, Colin (2013) ‘Is Humanity Enough? Refugees, Asylum Seekers and the Rights Regime’, in Juss, Satvinder and Harvey, Colin (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Refugee Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 68–89.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James (1991) The Law of Refugee Status, Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James (1991) ‘Reconceiving Refugee Law as Human Rights Protection’ 4(2) Journal of Refugee Studies 113–131.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James (1998) ‘The Relationship between Human Rights and Refugee Law: What Refugee Judges Can Contribute’ in International Association of Refugee Law Judges: The Realities of Refugee Determination on the Eve of a New Millennium: The Role of the Judiciary, 3rd Conference, Ottawa, October 1998, 80–90.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James (2005) The Rights of Refugees under International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James (2014) ‘The Conundrum of Concealment: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSCA [2013] FCAFC 155’, Melbourne Law School High Court Blog: Opinions on High, 9 November 2014, https://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/opinionsonhigh/2014/11/09/hathaway-szsca-fcafc.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James and Foster, Michelle (2003) ‘Internal Protection/Relocation/Flight Alternative as an Aspect of Refugee Status Determination’, in Feller, Erika, Nicholson, Frances and Türk, Volker (eds.) Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 357–417.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James and Foster, Michelle (2003) ‘Membership of a Particular Social Group’ Discussion Paper No. 4, Advanced Refugee Law Workshop, International Association of Refugee Law Judges, Auckland, New Zealand, October 2002, 15(3) International Journal of Refugee Law 477–491.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James and Foster, Michelle (2014) The Law of Refugee Status (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James and Pobjoy, Jason (2012) ‘Queer Cases Make Bad Law’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 315–389.Google Scholar
den Heijer, Maarten (2014) ‘Persecution for Reason of Sexual Orientation: X,Y and Z’, 51(4) Common Market Law Review 1217–1234.Google Scholar
Helton, Arthur (1983) ‘Persecution on Account of Membership in a Social Group as Basis for Refugee Status’, 15 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 39–67.Google Scholar
Hersh, Nicholas (2015) ‘Challenges to Assessing Same-Sex Relationships under Refugee Law In Canada’, 60(3) McGill Law Journal 527–571.Google Scholar
Hudson, Jeffrey H. (2013) ‘Comprehensive Literature Review Pertaining to Married Men Who Have Sex with Men (MMSM)’, 13(4) Journal of Bisexuality 417–601.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Terry (2010) Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.), Pyrmont: Lawbook.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Terry and Duncan, Nigel (2012) ‘Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research’, 17(1) Deakin Law Review 83–119.Google Scholar
ILGA Europe (2015) Glossary, www.ilga-europe.org/media/2431.Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists (2007) Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, March 2007, www.yogyakartaprinciples.org.Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists (2014) ‘X, Y and Z: A Glass Half Full for “Rainbow Refugees”?’, The International Commission of Jurists’ Observations on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in X, Y and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, ICJ, Geneva.Google Scholar
Jansen, Sabine and Le Déroff, Joël (2014) Good Practices Related to LGBTI Asylum Applicants in Europe, International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA), May 2014.Google Scholar
Jansen, Sabine and Spijkerboer, Thomas (2011) Fleeing Homophobia, Asylum Claims Related to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Europe, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, September 2011.Google Scholar
Johnson, Toni (2007) ‘Flamers, Flaunting and Permissible Persecution’, 15(1) Feminist Legal Studies 99–111.Google Scholar
Johnson, Toni (2011) ‘On Silence, Sexuality and Skeletons: Reconceptualizing Narrative in Asylum Hearings’, 20(1) Social & Legal Studies 57–78.Google Scholar
Juss, Satvinder (2015) ‘Sexual Orientation and the Sexualisation of Refugee Law’, 22 International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 128–153.Google Scholar
Kalkmann, Michael (2011) Fleeing Homophobia Questionnaire: Best Practices on the (Legal) Position of LGBT Asylum Seekers in the EU Member States – Germany, Fleeing Homophobia Project, www.rechten.vu.nl/nl/Images/Germany_questionnaire_tcm247-240406.pdf.Google Scholar
Kassisieh, Ghassan (2008) ‘From Lives of Fear to Lives of Freedom: A Review of Australian Refugee Decisions on the Basis of Sexual Orientation’, Gay & Lesbian Rights Lobby, Glebe.Google Scholar
Keil, Rainer (2016) ‘Sexuelle Orientierung im Flüchtlingsrecht und im allgemeinen Migrationsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, in Classen, Claus Dieter, Richter, Dagmar and Łukanko, Bernard (eds.) ‘Sexuelle Orientierung’ als Diskriminierungsgrund: Regelungsbedarf in Deutschland und Polen?, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 293–315.Google Scholar
Kendall, Christopher (2003) ‘Lesbian and Gay Refugees in Australia: Now That “Acting Discreetly” Is No Longer an Option, Will Equality Be Forthcoming?’, 15(4) International Journal of Refugee Law 715–749.Google Scholar
Kobelinsky, Carolina (2012) ‘L’asile gay: jurisprudence de l’intime a la Cour nationale du droit d’asile’, 3(82) Droit et Société 583–601.Google Scholar
Kobelinsky, Carolina (2012) ‘Ver o no ver al refugiado. La evaluación de las solicitudes de asilo (por motivos sexuales) en Francia’, 4 Revista Temas de Antropología y Migración 13–29.Google Scholar
Kobelinsky, Carolina (2015) ‘Judging Intimacies at the French Court of Asylum’, 38(2) Political and Legal Anthropology Review 338–355.Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Heather (2016) ‘The Shibboleth of Discretion: The Discretion, Identity, and Persecution Paradigm in American and Australian LGBT Asylum Claims, 31(2) Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice 206–240.Google Scholar
Ku Wei Bin, Gabriel (2014) No Freedom in a Closet: The Persistence of Discretion Reasoning in the Refugee Status Determination Process for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Asylum Applications to the European Union, master’s thesis, Lund University, Faculty of Law, Spring 2014, Lund University Student Papers, https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/4500056.Google Scholar
Labayle, Henri (1997) ‘Le droit d’asile en France: normalisation ou neutralisation?’, 13(2) Revue française de droit administratif 242–269.Google Scholar
Lambert, Hélène (2009) ‘Transnational judicial dialogue, harmonization and the Common European Asylum System’, 58(3) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 519–543.Google Scholar
Lambert, Hélène (2013) ‘Conclusion: Europe’s Normative Power in Refugee Law’, in Lambert, Hélène, McAdam, Jane and Fullerton, Maryellen (eds.) The Global Reach of European Refugee Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–266.Google Scholar
Lambert, Hélène (2013) ‘Introduction: European Refugee Law and Transnational Emulation’, in Lambert, Hélène, McAdam, Jane and Fullerton, Maryellen (eds.) The Global Reach of European Refugee Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–24.Google Scholar
Lambert, Hélène and Silga, Janine (2010) ‘Transnational Refugee Law in the French Courts: Deliberate or Compelled Change in Judicial Attitudes?’, in Guy Goodwin-Gil and Hélène Lambert (eds.) The Limits of Transnational Law – Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union, 35–56.Google Scholar
Lambert, Hélène, Messineo, Francesco and Tiedemann, Paul (2008) ‘Comparative Perspectives of Constitutional Asylum in France, Italy, and Germany: Requiescat In Pace?’, 27(3) Refugee Survey Quarterly 16–32.Google Scholar
Lambert, Hélène, McAdam, Jane and Fullerton, Maryellen, eds. (2013) The Global Reach of European Refugee Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lantero, Caroline (2013) ‘La notion de groupe social au sens de la convention de Genève dans la jurisprudence française’, 41 Actualités Juridiques – Droit Administratif 2364–2370.Google Scholar
Lantero, Caroline and Basilien-Gainche, Marie-Laure (2013) ‘Statut de réfugié et appartenance à un groupe social (Directive 2004/83/CE): Une victoire à la Pyrrhus pour les personnes homosexuelles’, La Revue des droits de l’homme [En ligne], Actualités Droits-Libertés, mis en ligne le 13 novembre 2013.Google Scholar
Lasa, Leire, López de Lacalle, Izaro, Pasarín, Estefanía and Ramírez de Olano, Iñaki (2009) Persecución por motivos de género y derecho de asilo: del contexto global al compromiso local – El sistema de asilo español frente a la violación de los derechos humanos de las mujeres y de lesbianas, gays, bisexuales y transexuales. Comisión Española de Ayuda al Refugiado en Euskadi (CEAR-Euskadi), Bilbao.Google Scholar
LaViolette, Nicole (1997) ‘The Immutable Refugees: Sexual Orientation in Canada (A.G.) v. Ward’, 55(1) University of Toronto Law Review 1–41.Google Scholar
LaViolette, Nicole (2013) ‘Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and the Refugee Determination Process’, report prepared for the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, online: Social Science Research Network, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2276049.Google Scholar
LaViolette, Nicole (2017) ‘Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and the Refugee Determination Process in Canada’, 18(1) Annals of Spiru Haret University Journalism Studies 5–55.Google Scholar
Leboeuf, Luc and Evangelia (Lilian) Tsourdi (2013) ‘Towards a Re-definition of Persecution? Assessing the Potential Impact of Y and Z’, 13(2) Human Rights Law Review 402–415.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Julian (2014) ‘Persecution, Concealment and the Limits of a Human Rights Approach in (European) Asylum Law – The Case of Germany v. Y and Z in the Court of Justice of the European Union’, 26(1) International Journal of Refugee Law 65–81.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen, Maselis, Ignace and Gutman, Kathleen (2014) EU Procedural Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lübbe, Anna (2011) ‘Zielgerichtetheit des Akteursverhaltens und Unterlassen im Flüchtlingsrecht’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2011, 164–167.Google Scholar
Lübbe, Anna (2012) ‘Verfolgungsvermeidende Anpassung an menschenrechtswidrige Verhaltenslenkungen als Grenze der Flüchtlingsanerkennung?’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2012, 7–13.Google Scholar
Lübbe, Anna (2013) ‘Flüchtlingsanerkennung in Verhaltenslenkungsfällen nach den Ahmadi-Entscheidungen des BVerwG’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2013, 272–278.Google Scholar
Macklin, Audrey (1994) ‘Ward v. Canada: A Review Essay’, 6(3) International Journal of Refugee Law 362–381.Google Scholar
Markard, Nora (2007) ‘Fortschritte im Flüchtlingsrecht? Gender Guidelines und geschlechtsspezifische Verfolgung’, 40(4) Kritische Justiz 373–390.Google Scholar
Markard, Nora (2011) ‘60 Jahre Genfer Flüchtlingskonvention: Verantwortung für den Flüchtlingsschutz – 11. Berliner Symposium zum Flüchtlingsschutz, 21–22. Juni 2011, Berlin – Tagungsbericht’, 8 Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 241–280.Google Scholar
Markard, Nora (2013) ‘Sexuelle Orientierung als Fluchtgrund – Das Ende der “Diskretion” – Aktuelle Entwicklungen beim Flüchtlingsschutz aufgrund der sexuellen Orientierung’, 3 Asylmagazin 74–84.Google Scholar
Markard, Nora and Adamietz, Laura (2011) ‘Keep It in the Closet? Flüchtlingsanerkennung wegen Homosexualität auf dem Prüfstand’, 44(3) Kritische Justiz 294–302.Google Scholar
McAdam, Jane (2008) ‘Introduction: Asylum and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, 27(3) Refugee Survey Quarterly 3–13.Google Scholar
Merino Sancho, Victor (2012) Tratamiento Jurídico de las Demandas de Asilo por Violencia contra las Mujeres en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Español: Perspectivas y Prospectivas, Pamplona: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Middelkoop, Louis (2013) ‘Normativity and Credibility of Sexual Orientation in Asylum Decision Making’, in Spikerboer, Thomas (ed.) Fleeing Homophobia: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Asylum, London: Routledge, 154–175.Google Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (1995) ‘Fear of Persecution or Just a Queer Feeling? Refugee Status and Sexual Orientation in Australia’, 20(6) Alternative Law Journal 261–265.Google Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2002) ‘Imagining Otherness: Refugee Claims on the Basis of Sexuality in Canada and Australia’, 26 Melbourne University Law Review 144–177.Google Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2004) ‘The Role of Rights in Asylum Claims on the Basis of Sexual Orientation’, 4(2) Human Rights Law Review 193–228.Google Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2005) ‘A Preoccupation with Perversion: The British Response to Refugee Claims on the Basis of Sexual Orientation 1989–2003’, 14(1) Social Legal Studies 115–138.Google Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2009) ‘From Discretion to Disbelief: Recent Trends in Refugee Determinations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation in Australia and the United Kingdom’, 13(2/3) International Journal of Human Rights 391–414.Google Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2012) ‘The Right of Lesbians and Gay Men to Live Freely, Openly, and on Equal Terms Is Not Bad Law: A Reply to Hathaway and Pobjoy’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 497–527.Google Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2013) ‘Sexual Orientation and Refugee Status Determination over the Past 20 Years: Unsteady Progress through Standard Sequences?’, in Spijkerboer, Thomas (ed.) Fleeing Homophobia: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Asylum, London: Routledge, 32–54.Google Scholar
Mohr, Richard D. (1992) Gay Ideas: Outing and Other Controversies, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Mullally, Siobhán (2013) ‘Gender and Asylum Law: Providing Transformative Remedies?’, in Juss, Satvinder and Harvey, Colin (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Refugee Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 196–225.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Elena (2013) Personal Interview, CEAR Madrid, 18 June 2013.Google Scholar
Murray, David A. B. (2016) ‘Queer Forms: Producing Documentation in Sexual Orientation Refugee Cases’, 89(2) Anthropological Quarterly 465–484.Google Scholar
Murray, David A. B. (2017) ‘The Homonational Archive: Sexual Orientation and Gendered Identity Refugee Documentation in Canada and the USA’, 82(3) Ethnos 520–544.Google Scholar
New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (2012) Vol. 44:2 Online Symposium, http://opiniojuris.org/2012/03/07/new-york-university-journal-of-international-law-and-politics-vol-442-opinio-juris-online-symposium.Google Scholar
Noll, Gregor (2006) ‘Asylum Claims and the Translation of Culture into Politics’, 41(3) Texas International Law Journal 491–501.Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, Paul (2008) ‘A Well-Founded Fear of Having My Sexual Orientation Asylum Claim Heard in the Wrong Court’, 52(2) New York Law School Law Review 185–212.Google Scholar
Okisai, Kizitos Charloz (2015) Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Asylum Claims and Refugee Protection under South African Law, LLM Dissertation, Faculty of Law, Unviersity of Pretoria, South Africa, https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/46231.Google Scholar
Organization for Refuge, Asylum & Migration (2011) Testing Sexual Orientation: A Scientific and Legal Analysis of Plethysmography in Asylum and Refugee Status Proceedings, San Francisco: ORAM.Google Scholar
Pathela, Preeti, Hajat, Anjum, Schillinger, Julia, Blank, Susan, Sell, Randall and Mostashari, Farzad (2006) ‘Discordance between Sexual Behavior and Self-Reported Sexual Identity: A Population-Based Survey of New York City Men’, 145(6) Annals of Internal Medicine 416–425.Google Scholar
Perret, Hélène (2000) La Règle de droit à la Commission des recours des réfugiés, mémoire de DEA en sociologie du droit, université Panthéon-Assas (Paris 2), dir. J.-P. Heurtin.Google Scholar
Phillips, Marianne and Jorgensen, Louise J. (2002) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pobjoy, Jason (2013) ‘A Child Rights Framework for Assessing the Status of Refugee Children’, in Juss, Satvinder and Harvey, Colin (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Refugee Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 91–137.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard (2007) ‘In Memoriam: Bernard D. Meltzer (1914–2007)’, 74(2) University of Chicago Law Review 435, 437, cited in Terry Hutchinson and Nigel Duncan (2012) ‘Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research’, 17(1) Deakin Law Review 83–119, 107.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan and Wetherell, Margaret (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology – Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rehaag, Sean (2008) ‘Patrolling the Borders of Sexual Orientation: Bisexual Refugee Claims in Canada’, 53 McGill Law Journal 59–102.Google Scholar
Rehaag, Sean (2009) ‘Bisexuals Need Not Apply: A Comparative Appraisal of Refugee Law and Policy in Canada, the United States, and Australia’, 13(2) International Journal of Human Rights 415–436.Google Scholar
Rodrigues Araújo, Alexandra Maria (2014) ‘The Qualification for Being a Refugee under EU Law: Religion as a Reason for Persecution – Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Judgment of 5 September 2012, Joined Cases C-71/11 and C-99/11, Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. Y and Z’, 16(4) European Journal of Migration and Law 535–558.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Moya, Almudena (2015) ‘Asylum and Religious Freedom: The ECJ Position’, 94 Revista de Derecho Político 115–140.Google Scholar
Sahliu Braimah, Tim (2015) ‘Divorcing Sexual Orientation from Religion and Politics: Utilizing the Convention Grounds of Religion and Political Opinion in Same-Sex Oriented Asylum Claims’, 27(3) International Journal of Refugee Law 481–497.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred (2012) ‘Kriterien der Flüchtlingsanerkennung. Hier: Sexuelle Orientierung’, 424–7313/05 – 12 (5506046-286) Brief an Volker Beck MdB, Nürnberg, 27 December.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Lisa (2015) The ‘True’ Homosexual Refugee – An Archaeology of the Becoming and Governing of Refugees through Scientific-Legal Categories of Sexuality in German Legal Decision-Making, master’s thesis, Lund University, Sociology of Law Department, Autumn 2015, Lund Student University Papers, https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8568341.Google Scholar
Schutzer, Mathew (2012) ‘Bringing the Asylum Process Out of the Closet: Promoting the Acknowledgment of LGB Refugees’, 13(3) Georgetown Journal of Gender & the Law 669–707.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky (1990) Epistemology of the Closet, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smeulders, Max (2016) Somewhere over the Rainbow: The Contemporary Situation for LGBTI Asylum Seekers in the Netherlands, master’s thesis, Tilburg Law School, Tilburg Univesrsity. International and European law, track International law and Human Rights, 2015–2016, http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=141905.Google Scholar
Smith, Isaac T. R. (2015) ‘Searching for Consistency in Asylum’s Protected Grounds’, 100 Iowa Law Review 1891–1915.Google Scholar
Spijkerboer, Thomas (2000) Gender and Refugee Status, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Spijkerboer, Thomas (2012) ‘Two Remarks on Queer Law and Queer Politics: Thomas Spijkerboer Responds to Jenni Millbank & Guglielmo Verdirame’, Panel 3 of the Online Symposium of the NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, 44(2), http://opiniojuris.org/2012/03/09/two-remarks-on-queer-law-and-queer-politics-thomas-spijkerboer-responds-to-jenni-millbank-guglielmo-verdirame.Google Scholar
Spijkerboer, Thomas (2013) ‘Sexual Identity, Normativity and Asylum’, in Spijkerboer, Thomas (ed.) Fleeing Homophobia: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Asylum, London: Routledge, 217–238.Google Scholar
Stein, Jeffrey D. (2012) ‘A Brief Introduction to the Conversation’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 313–314.Google Scholar
Szczensny, Jerzy (2009) ‘Sexuelle Selbstbestimmung und das Recht auf Asyl in Deutschland’, in Lohrenscheit, Claudia (ed.) Sexuelle Selbstbestimmung als Menschenrecht, Berlin: Nomos, 169–181.Google Scholar
Teitgen-Colly, Catherine (1994) ‘Le droit d’asile: la fin des illusions’, L’Actualité juridique – Droit administratif 97–114.Google Scholar
Teitgen-Colly, Catherine (2006) ‘The European Union and Asylum: An Illusion of Protection’, 43(6) Common Market Law Review 1503–1566.Google Scholar
Teitgen-Colly, Catherine and Julien-Lafèrriere, François (1998) ‘La réforme du droit d’asile’, L’Actualité juridique – Droit administratif, 1002–1004.Google Scholar
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (2010) HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – Case for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, copy on file with author.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, Paul (2010) ‘The Use of Foreign Asylum Jurisprudence in the German Administrative Courts’, in Guy Goodwin-Gil and Hélène Lambert (eds.) The Limits of Transnational Law – Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union, 57–84.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, Paul (2014) Flüchtlingsrecht – Die materiellen und verfahrensrechtlichen Grundlagen, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Tissier-Raffin, Marion (2015) ‘L’orientation sexuelle comme motif de persécution doit être appréciée dans la dignité’, La Revue des droits de l’homme [En ligne], Actualités Droits-Libertés, mis en ligne le 15 janvier 2015.Google Scholar
Titze, Anngeret (2012) ‘Sexuelle Orientierung und die Zumutung der Diskretion’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2012, 93–102.Google Scholar
Tobin, John (2012) ‘Assessing GLBTI Refugee Claims: Using Human Rights Law to Shift the Narrative of Persecution within Refugee Law’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 447–484.Google Scholar
Topel, Kimberly D. (2017) ‘“So, What Should I Ask Him to Prove That He’s Gay?”: How Sincerity, and Not Stereotype, Should Dictate the Outcome of an LGB Asylum Claim in the United States’, 102 Iowa Law Review 2357–2384.Google Scholar
Türk, Volker (2013) ‘Ensuring Protection to LGBTI Persons of Concern’, opinion delivered at the Invisible in the City: Urban Protection Gaps Facing Sexual Minorities Fleeing Persecution, HIAS LGBTI Symposium, 20–21 September 2012, 25(1) International Journal of Refugee Law 120–129.Google Scholar
UK Home Office (2006) Explanatory Memorandum to the Refugee or Person in Need of International Protection (Qualification) Regulations 2006, No. 2525, www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/2525/pdfs/uksi_20062525_en.pdf.Google Scholar
UK Home Office (2017) ‘Afghanistan: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity’, Country Policy and Information Note.Google Scholar
UNHCR (1979, re-edited 1992) Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, HCR/IP/4/Eng/REV.1 Reedited, Geneva, January 1992.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2001) The International Protection of Refugees: Interpreting Article 1 of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, April 2001.Google Scholar
UNHCR ExCom (2005) Conclusion on the Provision on International Protection Including through Complementary Forms of Protection, Executive Committee of the High Commissioner’s Programme 7 October 2005, No. 103 (LVI).Google Scholar
UNHCR (2011) HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – Case for the first intervener (the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), 19 April 2010, http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4bd1abbc2.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2013) Beyond Proof, Credibility Assessment in EU Asylum Systems: Full Report, May 2013.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2015) States Parties to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol, www.unhcr.org/protect/PROTECTION/3b73b0d63.pdf.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2015) The Case Law of the European Regional Courts: The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. Refugees, asylum-seekers, and stateless persons (1st ed.), June 2015.Google Scholar
University of Michigan Law School (2015) The Michigan Guidelines on Risk for Reasons of Political Opinion, April 2015, www.refworld.org/docid/555de15b4.html.Google Scholar
Vanheule, Dirk (1997) ‘A Comparison of the Judicial Interpretations of the Notion of Refugee’, in Carlier, Jean-Yves and Vanheule, Dirk (eds.) Europe and Refugees: A Challenge?, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 98–103.Google Scholar
Velasco, Bernardo M. (2017) ‘Who Are the Real Refugees: Labels as Evidence of a Particular Social Group’, 59 Arizona Law Review 235–262.Google Scholar
Verdirame, Guglielmo (2012) ‘A Friendly Act of Socio-cultural Contestation: Asylum and the Big Cultural Divide’, 44(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 559–572.Google Scholar
Vogler, Stefan (2016) ‘Legally Queer: The Construction of Sexuality in LGBQ Asylum Claims’, 50(4) Law & Society Review 856–889.Google Scholar
Wagner, Neva (2016) ‘B Is for Bisexual: The Forgotten Letter in U.K. Sexual Orientation Asylum Reform’, 26 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 205–227.Google Scholar
Walker, Kristen (1996) ‘The Importance of Being Out: Sexuality and Refugee Status’, 18 Sydney Law Review 568–597.Google Scholar
Walker, Kristen (2000) ‘Sexuality and Refugee Status in Australia’ 12(2) International Journal of Refugee Law 175–211.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan (1993) Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (2nd ed.), Athens: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Wayne, Adena L. (2016) ‘Unique Identities and Vulnerabilities: The Case for Transgender Identity as a Basis for Asylum’, 102 Cornell Law Review 241–270.Google Scholar
Wessels, Janna (2011) ‘Sexual Orientation in Refugee Status Determination’, RSC Working Paper Series No. 74, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Wessels, Janna (2012) ‘HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) – Reflections on a New Test for Sexuality-Based Asylum Claims in Britain’, 24(4) International Journal of Refugee Law 815–839.Google Scholar
Wessels, Janna (2013) ‘“Discretion” in Sexuality-Based Asylum Cases: An Adaptive Phenomenon’, in Spijkerboer, Thomas (ed.) Fleeing Homophobia: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Asylum, London: Routledge, 55–81.Google Scholar
Wessels, Janna (2016) ‘“Discretion”, Persecution and the Act/Identity Dichotomy’, VU Migration Law Series No 12, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wessels, Janna (2017) ‘Publicly Manifested—Fatefully Determined—Invariably “Discreet”: The Assessment of Sexuality-Based Asylum Claims in Germany and France’ 29(2) Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 343–374.Google Scholar
Young, Rebecca M. and Meyer, Ilan H. (2005) ‘The Trouble with “MSM” and “WSW”: Erasure of the Sexual-Minority Person in Public Health Discourse’, 95(7) American Journal of Public Health 1144–1149.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Janna Wessels, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • Book: The Concealment Controversy
  • Online publication: 19 July 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108938402.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Janna Wessels, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • Book: The Concealment Controversy
  • Online publication: 19 July 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108938402.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Janna Wessels, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • Book: The Concealment Controversy
  • Online publication: 19 July 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108938402.017
Available formats
×