Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Notation
- Part I Classic Statistical Inference
- Part II Early Computer-Age Methods
- Part III Twenty-First-Century Topics
- 15 Large-Scale Hypothesis Testing and FDRs
- 16 Sparse Modeling and the Lasso
- 17 Random Forests and Boosting
- 18 Neural Networks and Deep Learning
- 19 Support-Vector Machines and Kernel Methods
- 20 Inference After Model Selection
- 21 Empirical Bayes Estimation Strategies
- Epilogue
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
17 - Random Forests and Boosting
from Part III - Twenty-First-Century Topics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2016
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Notation
- Part I Classic Statistical Inference
- Part II Early Computer-Age Methods
- Part III Twenty-First-Century Topics
- 15 Large-Scale Hypothesis Testing and FDRs
- 16 Sparse Modeling and the Lasso
- 17 Random Forests and Boosting
- 18 Neural Networks and Deep Learning
- 19 Support-Vector Machines and Kernel Methods
- 20 Inference After Model Selection
- 21 Empirical Bayes Estimation Strategies
- Epilogue
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
Summary
In the modern world we are often faced with enormous data sets, both in terms of the number of observations n and in terms of the number of variables p. This is of course good news—we have always said the more data we have, the better predictive models we can build. Well, we are there now—we have tons of data, and must figure out how to use it.
Although we can scale up our software to fit the collection of linear and generalized linear models to these behemoths, they are often too modest and can fall way short in terms of predictive power. A need arose for some general purpose tools that could scale well to these bigger problems, and exploit the large amount of data by fitting a much richer class of functions, almost automatically. Random forests and boosting are two relatively recent innovations that fit the bill, and have become very popular as “out-thebox” learning algorithms that enjoy good predictive performance. Random forests are somewhat more automatic than boosting, but can also suffer a small performance hit as a consequence.
These two methods have something in common: they both represent the fitted model by a sum of regression trees. We discuss trees in some detail in Chapter 8. A single regression tree is typically a rather weak prediction model; it is rather amazing that an ensemble of trees leads to the state of the art in black-box predictors!
We can broadly describe both these methods very simply.
Random forest Grow many deep regression trees to randomized versions of the training data, and average them. Here “randomized” is a wideranging term, and includes bootstrap sampling and/or subsampling of the observations, as well as subsampling of the variables.
Boosting Repeatedly grow shallow trees to the residuals, and hence build up an additive model consisting of a sum of trees.
The basic mechanism in random forests is variance reduction by averaging. Each deep tree has a high variance, and the averaging brings the variance down. In boosting the basic mechanism is bias reduction, although different flavors include some variance reduction as well. Both methods inherit all the good attributes of trees, most notable of which is variable selection.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Computer Age Statistical InferenceAlgorithms, Evidence, and Data Science, pp. 324 - 350Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016