Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of cases
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Complicity between bilateralism and community interest
- 3 Complicity and the international rule of law
- 4 Complicity in customary international law
- 5 The concept of complicity in Article 16 ASR
- 6 The consequences of complicity
- 7 Complicity and aggravated responsibility
- 8 A network of rules on complicity
- General conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of cases
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Complicity between bilateralism and community interest
- 3 Complicity and the international rule of law
- 4 Complicity in customary international law
- 5 The concept of complicity in Article 16 ASR
- 6 The consequences of complicity
- 7 Complicity and aggravated responsibility
- 8 A network of rules on complicity
- General conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility , pp. 429 - 474Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
International Crimes of States – A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State ResponsibilityBerlinde Gruyter 1989Google Scholar
Droit du pouvoir – Pouvoir du droit: Mélanges offerts à Jean SalmonBrusselsBruylant 2007Google Scholar
Das Verschulden im völkerrechtlichen UnrechtZeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 20 1940 449Google Scholar
Nuclear Weapons, Unclear Law? Deciphering the Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion of the International Court of JusticeBritish Year Book of International Law 68 1997 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Responsibility for the Wrongful Acts of Rebels – An Aspect of the Southern Rhodesia ProblemBritish Year Book of International Law 43 1968Google Scholar
Custom as a Source in International LawBritish Year Book of International Law 47 1974 1Google Scholar
Equity and General Principles of LawInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 25 1976 801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Völkerrechtliche Praxis der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Jahre 1958Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 20 1960 636Google Scholar
The Jus Cogens Nature of Non-RefoulementInternational Journal of Refugee Law 13 2002 533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Countermeasures of General InterestEuropean Journal of International Law 13 2002 1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Responsibility and the Unmaking of International LawHarvard International Law Journal 29 1988 1Google Scholar
The Health of Nations – Society and Law Beyond the StateCambridgeCambridge University Press 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le droit international nouveau dans ses rapports avec la vie actuelle des peuplesParisPedone 1959Google Scholar
Der Allgemeine Teil des Völkerstrafrechts – Ansätze einer DogmatisierungBerlinDuncker & Humblot 2002Google Scholar
Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court – Observers’ Notes, Article by ArticleMunich/OxfordC. H. Beck and Hart 2008Google Scholar
Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International LawCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La responsabilité internationale des Etats à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangersRevue générale de droit international public 13 1906 5Google Scholar
Berlin/Leipzigde Gruyter 1929
Einschränkungen der Staatenimmunität in Fällen schwerer Menschenrechtsverletzungen – Klagen von Bürgern gegen einen fremden Staat oder ausländische staatliche Funktionsträger vor nationalen GerichtenBerlinDuncker & Humblot 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Normative Role of the General Assembly of the United Nations and the Declaration of Principles of Friendly RelationsRecueil des Cours 137 1972 419Google Scholar
Through the Prism of Diversity – The Articles on State Responsibility in the Light of the ILC Fragmentation ReportGerman Yearbook of International Law 49 2006 165Google Scholar
Peace Through International Law – The Role of the International Law CommissionBerlinSpringer 2009Google Scholar
Parliamentary Consent to the Use of the German Armed Forces Abroad: The 2008 AWACS Decision of the Federal Constitutional CourtGerman Law Journal 9 2008 2223Google Scholar
The Duty of Third States to Implement and Enforce International Humanitarian LawNordic Journal of International Law 66 1997 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Abuse of Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities – A Necessary Evil?AldershotAshgate 1996Google Scholar
Questioning the Legitimacy of Jus Cogens in the Global Legal OrderIsrael Yearbook of Human Rights 38 2008 199Google Scholar
Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction – The Case of Trade Measures for the Protection of Human RightsJournal of World Trade 36 2002 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Conditionality in the EU’s International AgreementsOxfordOxford University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Functional Approach to “General Principles of International LawMichigan Journal of International Law 11 1990 768Google Scholar
Effektivität und Legitimität – Die Entwicklung der Friedenssicherung durch Zwang nach Kapitel VII der Charta der Vereinten Nationen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der neueren Praxis des SicherheitsratesBerlinDuncker & Humblot 1996Google Scholar
Counterintuiting CountermeasuresAmerican Journal of International Law 96 2002 817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Conception of International Law as a Legal SystemGerman Yearbook of International Law 50 2007 393Google Scholar
The Emperor’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International LawStanford Law Review 60 2007 595Google Scholar
The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A CommentaryOxfordOxford University Press 2006Google Scholar
Der Glaube an das universale Recht – Zur Völkerrechtstheorie Hans Kelsens und seiner SchülerBaden-BadenNomos 2001Google Scholar
La pluralité d’Etats responsable – Vers une solidarité internationale?Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Internationales und Europäisches Recht 17 2007 13Google Scholar
The Kuwait Crisis: Sanctions and Their Economic ConsequencesCambridgeCambridge University Press 1991
Denying State Immunity to Violators of Human RightsAustrian Journal of Public and International Law 46 1994 195Google Scholar
L’immunité des Etats et les violations graves des droits de l’homme: la fonction de l’interprête dans la détermination du droit internationalRevue générale de droit international public 108 2004 63Google Scholar
Ferrini v. Federal Republic of GermanyAmerican Journal of International Law 99 2005 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights and the Magic ofEuropean Journal of International Law 19 2008 491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Die Handlungsfreiheit der Staaten – System und Struktur der VölkerrechtsordnungÖsterreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 29 1978 173Google Scholar
Bilateralism, Multilateralism, and the Architecture of International LawHarvard International Law Journal 49 2008 323Google Scholar
Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staaten als Rechtsbuch dargestelltNördlingenC. H. Beck 1868Google Scholar
The International Court of Justice, International Law and Nuclear WeaponsCambridgeCambridge University Press 1999Google Scholar
Case Note (on Behrami and Behrami v. France, Samarati v. France, Germany and Norway)American Journal of International Law 102 2008 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L’expulsion et les difficultés internationales qu’en soulève la pratiqueRecueil des Cours 18 1927 443Google Scholar
Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2008 www.mpepil.comGoogle Scholar
Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions Revisited: Protecting Collective InterestsInternational Review of the Red Cross 82 2000 67Google Scholar
Complicity and Beyond: International Law and the Transfer of Small Arms and Light WeaponsInternational Review of the Red Cross 87 2005 467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Relationship Between State and Individual Responsibility for International CrimesLeidenNijhoff 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
War, Neutrality and Non-BelligerencyAmerican Journal of International Law 35 1941 618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Der Irak-Krieg und das völkerrechtliche GewaltverbotArchiv des Völkerrechts 41 2003 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Arms Trade and States’ Duty to Ensure Respect for Humanitarian and Human Rights LawJournal of Conflict and Security Law 12 2008 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Theory of Implied State Complicity in International ClaimsBritish Year Book of International Law 9 1928 42Google Scholar
Neglected Aspects of the Destroyer DealAmerican Journal of International Law 34 1940 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recognition in Theory and PracticeBritish Year Book of International Law 53 1982 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solidarität – Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen RechtsgenossenschaftFrankfurt/MainSuhrkamp 2002Google Scholar
Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. MensahLeidenNijhoff 2007Google Scholar
The Kosovo Opinion and Secession: The Sounds of Silence and Missing LinksGerman Law Journal 11 2010 881Google Scholar
La théorie des sources face au droit international général: réflexions sur l’émergence du droit objectif dans l’ordre juridique internationaleRevue générale de droit international public 106 2002 581Google Scholar
Conceptualising the Relationship Between Jus Cogens and Erga Omnes RulesNordic Journal of International Law 66 1997 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custom, Power and the Power of Rules – International Relations and Customary International LawCambridgeCambridge University Press 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005
2008 www.theglobeandmail.com
La pratique suisse en matière de droit international public 2005Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Internationales und Europäisches Recht 16 2006 605Google Scholar
The Development of International Human Rights Law by the Operation and Case-Law of the European and the Inter-American Courts of Human RightsHuman Rights Law Journal 25 2004 157Google Scholar
International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium (I), General Course on Public International LawRecueil des Cours 316 2006 9Google Scholar
International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium (II), General Course on Public International LawRecueil des Cours 317 2006 9Google Scholar
State Immunity, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens: A Critique of the Normative Hierarchy TheoryAmerican Journal of International Law 97 2003 741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Iran–United States Claims Tribunal: Its Contribution to the Law of State ResponsibilityIrvington-on-Hudson, NYTransnational 1998Google Scholar
The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship Between Authority and FormAmerican Journal of International Law 96 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreign Economic Assistance and Respect for Civil and Political Rights: Chile – A Case StudyTexas International Law Journal 14 1979 251Google Scholar
Remarks on Scelle’s Theory of “Role-Splitting” (Dédoublement Fonctionnel) in International LawEuropean Journal of International Law 1 1990 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007 http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/antonio
On the Use of Criminal Law Notions in Determining State Responsibility for GenocideJournal of International Criminal Justice 5 2007 875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Nicaragua and Tadic Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in BosniaEuropean Journal of International Law 18 2007 649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Re-examining International Responsibility: “Complicity” in the Context of Human Rights ViolationsILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 14 2008 525Google Scholar
Rhodesia Five Years After the Unilateral Declaration of IndependenceVerfassung und Recht in Übersee 4 1971 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary International LawBritish Year Book of International Law 56 1985 1Google Scholar
General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and TribunalsLondonStevens 1953Google Scholar
The Turn to Ethics: Disinvestment from Multinational Corporations for Human Rights Violations – The Case of Norway’s Sovereign Wealth FundAmerican University International Law Review 23 2008 577Google Scholar
The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A CommentaryOxfordOxford University Press 2006Google Scholar
Attributing Acts of Omission to the StateMichigan Journal of International Law 12 1991 312Google Scholar
Symbiosis in International Human Rights Law: The Öcalan Case and the Evolving Law on the Death PenaltyJournal of International Criminal Justice 1 2003 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conflits, sécurité et coopération – Liber Amicorum Victor-Yves GhebaliBrusselsBruylant 2007Google Scholar
Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Through International Law – Liber Amicorum Lucius CaflischLeidenNijhoff 2007Google Scholar
Categories of Corporate Complicity in Human Rights AbusesHastings International and Comparative Law Review 24 2001 339Google Scholar
Legal Visions of the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Judge Christopher WeeramantryThe HagueKluwer 1998Google Scholar
Conditioning US Security Assistance on Human Rights PracticesAmerican Journal of International Law 76 1982 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le pouvoir de sanction de l’ONU – Etude théorique de la coercition non militaireParisPedone 1974Google Scholar
Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean PictetLeidenNijhoff 1984Google Scholar
Vers un assouplissement des conditions permettant d’engager la responsabilité d’un Etat pour génocide?Annuaire français de droit international 53 2007 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Les Conventions de Vienne sur le droit des traités – Commentaire article par articleBrusselsBruylant 2006
Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical FrameworkPublic Law 1997 467Google Scholar
Revising the Draft Articles on State ResponsibilityEuropean Journal of International Law 10 1999 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: A RetrospectAmerican Journal of International Law 96 2002 874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility, Introduction, Text and CommentariesCambridgeCambridge University Press 2002Google Scholar
2005
Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International LawRecueil des Cours 319 2007 325Google Scholar
An Introduction to International Criminal Law and ProcedureCambridgeCambridge University Press 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trashing Customary International LawAmerican Journal of International Law 81 1987 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Les réparations de guerre en droit international public. La responsabilité internationale des Etats à l’épreuve de la guerreBrusselsBruylant 2002Google Scholar
Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal MaterialsEuropean Journal of International Law 19 2008 1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebellion and State Responsibility: Wrongdoing by Democratically Elected InsurgentsInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 2009 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Les Conventions de Vienne sur le droit des traités – Commentaire article par articleBrusselsBruylant 2006Google Scholar
Public Law Enforcement without Public Law Safeguards? An Analysis of State Practice on Third-Party Countermeasures and Their Relationship to the UN Security CouncilBritish Year Book of International Law 77 2006 333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obligations Erga Omnes and International Crimes – A Theoretical Inquiry into the Implementation and Enforcement of the International Responsibility of StatesThe HagueKluwer 1996Google Scholar
Australia and East Timor – Rights Erga Omnes, Complicity and Non-RecognitionAustralian International Law Journal 1999 63Google Scholar
Globalization and Jurisdiction: Lessons from the European Convention on Human RightsBaltic Yearbook of International Law 6 2006 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Prohibition of Torture as an International Norm of Jus Cogens and Its Implications for National and Customary LawEuropean Journal of International Law 15 2004 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Emergence of International and Regional Value Systems as Manifestations of the Emerging International Constitutional OrderLeiden Journal of International Law 19 2006 611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fait continu, fait composé et fait complexe dans le droit de la responsabilitéAnnuaire Français de Droit International 52 2006 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear WeaponsCambridgeCambridge University Press 1999Google Scholar
The International Law Commission Fifty Years After: An EvaluationNew YorkUnited Nations 2000Google Scholar
Staats- und völkerrechtliche Aspekte des Irak-Krieges 2003Informationsschriften zum Humanitären Völkerrecht 16 2003 181Google Scholar
Codifying and Developing Meta-Rules: The ILC and the Law of TreatiesGerman Yearbook of International Law 49 2006 129Google Scholar
Criminalizing Complicity – A Comparative AnalysisJournal of International Criminal Justice 5 2007 977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of JusticeNew York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 1999 791Google Scholar
A General Stocktaking of the Connections between the Multilateral Dimension of Obligations and Codification of the Law of State ResponsibilityEuropean Journal of International Law 13 2002 1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L’unité de l’ordre juridique internationale. Cours général de droit international publicRecueil des Cours 297 2002 9Google Scholar
Quarante ans de codification du droit de la responsabilité internationale des Etats. Un bilanRevue générale de droit international public 107 2003 305Google Scholar
Some Reflections on Contemporary International Law and the Appeal to Universal ValuesEuropean Journal of International Law 16 2005 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crime sans châtiment ou mission accomplieRevue générale de droit international public 111 2007 243Google Scholar
The Rule of (Administrative) Law in International LawLaw and Contemporary Problems 68 2005 127Google Scholar
The Constitution of Law – Legality in a Time of EmergencyCambridgeCambridge University Press 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Complicity in Genocide” Versus “Aiding and Abetting in GenocideJournal of International Criminal Justice 3 2005 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechtliche Schranken des Handels mit KriegsmaterialSchweizerische Zeitschrift für Internationales und Europäisches Recht 15 2005 665Google Scholar
Die Anerkennung der obligatorischen Gerichtsbarkeit des Internationalen Gerichtshofs durch DeutschlandZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 68 2008 763Google Scholar
The Nature of the Subjective Element in Customary International LawInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 44 1995 501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Dams Report Challenges Financing for Ilisu DamTurkish Daily News 2001Google Scholar
Nachbarrechtliche Pflichten im internationalen Wasserrecht und Implikationen von DrittstaatenArchiv des Völkerrechts 39 2001Google Scholar
Umweltvölkerrechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für EntwicklungsprojekteBerichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 41 2005 329Google Scholar
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, A CommentaryOxfordOxford University Press 2002Google Scholar
Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial InstitutionsOxfordHart 2004Google Scholar
United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of LawCambridgeCambridge University Press 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International CommunityColumbia Journal of Transnational Law 36 1998 529Google Scholar
UN Security Council Reform and the Right of Veto: A Constitutional PerspectiveThe HagueKluwer 1998Google Scholar
Der Schutz der Menschenrechte als zentraler Inhalt des völkerrechtlichen GemeinwohlsEuropäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 30 2003 1Google Scholar
Die Gegenwartskrise des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltverbots vor dem Hintergrund der geschichtlichen EntwicklungEuropäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 31 2004 241Google Scholar
The Charter of the United Nations as the Constitution of the International CommunityLeidenNijhoff 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücken im Völkerrecht – Zu Rechtscharakter, Quellen, Systemzusammenhang, Methodenlehre und Funktionen des VölkerrechtsBerlinDuncker & Humblot 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Is Neutrality Still a Term of Present Law?American Journal of International Law 63 1969 100Google Scholar
Elements of Nordic Practice 2001/2003: NorwayNordic Journal of International Law 73 2004 551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global LawMichigan Journal of International Law 25 2003 999Google Scholar
The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: General Principles and Substantive LawBritish Year Book of International Law 27 1950 1Google Scholar
The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–54: General Principles and Sources of LawBritish Year Book of International Law 30 1953 1Google Scholar
The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of LawRecueil des Cours 92 1957 1Google Scholar
Symbolae Verzijl: présentées au professeur J. H. W. Verzijl à l’occasion de son LXX-ième anniversaireThe HagueNijhoff 1958Google Scholar
Third Parties and the Law of TreatiesMax Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 6 2002 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Accountability for Violations of the Ius in Bello: The Impact of the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian LawJournal of Conflict and Security Law 11 2006 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Promotional Jus Cogens: A Critical Appraisal of Jus Cogens’ Legal EffectsNordic Journal of International Law 77 2008 429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case Note (Federal Republic of Germany v. Giovanni Mantelli and Others)American Journal of International Law 103 2009 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common Article 1 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Soap Bubble?European Journal of International Law 21 2010 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droit de la sécurité collective et droit de la responsabilité internationale de l’EtatParisPedone 2006Google Scholar
The Uses of “General Principles” in the Development of International LawAmerican Journal of International Law 57 1963 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das de facto-Regime im Völkerrecht: eine Untersuchung zur Rechtsstellung ‘nichtanerkannter’ Staaten und ähnlicher GebildeCologne:Heymanns 1968Google Scholar
Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung – Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit – Menschenrechte. Festschrift für Hermann MoslerBerlinSpringer 1984Google Scholar
Collective Enforcement of International ObligationsZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 47 1987 67Google Scholar
Reactions by Not Directly Affected States to Breaches of Public International LawRecueil des Cours 248 1994 345Google Scholar
Konstitutionalisierung des VölkerrechtsBerichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 39 2000 427Google Scholar
Coercion, Causation and the Fictional Elements of Indirect State ResponsibilityVanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 40 2007 611Google Scholar
Réflexions sur le rôle du Conseil de Sécurité dans le nouvel ordre mondialRevue générale de droit international public 97 1993 297Google Scholar
International Responsibility Today – Essays in Memory of Oscar SchachterLeidenNijhoff 2005Google Scholar
Peace Through International Law – The Role of the International Law CommissionBerlinSpringer 2009Google Scholar
Zufall und force majeure im System der Staatenverantwortlichkeit anhand der ILC-KodifikationsarbeitBerlinDuncker & Humblot 1991Google Scholar
A Return Ticket to “Communitarisme”, PleaseEuropean Journal of International Law 13 2002 1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
War Crimes and State Immunity in the DecisionJournal of International Criminal Justice 3 2005 224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Un regard procédural sur la fragmentation du droit internationalRevue générale de droit international public 110 2006 303Google Scholar
Breach of the Obligation to Prevent and Reparation Thereof in the ICJ’s Genocide Convention JudgmentEuropean Journal of International Law 18 2007 695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post 1945 German International Law and State ResponsibilityGerman Yearbook of International Law 50 2007 407Google Scholar
La codificazione della responsabilità internazionale degli stati alla prova dei fatti – Probleme e spunti di riflessioneMilanGiuffrè 2006Google Scholar
Transnational State Responsibility for Violations of Human RightsHarvard Human Rights Law Journal 12 1999 267Google Scholar
The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush AdministrationNew YorkNorton 2007Google Scholar
Extraterritorial Application of the European Convention on Human Rights: Territorial Focus in the Age of Globalization?Netherlands International Law Review 52 2003 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Rule of Law and Absolute SovereigntyUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review 106 1958 943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charter of the United Nations – Commentary and DocumentsNew YorkColumbia University Press 1969Google Scholar
La Convention de Genève pour l’amélioration du sort des blessés et des malades dans les armées en campagne, CommentaireGenevaInternational Committee of the Red Cross 1930Google Scholar
Collective Responses to Illegal Acts in International Law – United Nations Action in the Question of Southern RhodesiaDordrecht: Nijhoff 1990Google Scholar
Security Council Enforcement Action and Issues of State ResponsibilityInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 43 1994 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Complicity in the Law of International ResponsibilityRevue Belge de Droit International 29 1996 370Google Scholar
The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of LawOxfordOxford University Press 2002Google Scholar
The Concept of War in Modern International LawInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 36 1987 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergleich zwischen den Interpretationsmethoden europäischer Verfassungsgerichte und des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für MenschenrechteZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 61 2001 461Google Scholar
Völkerrechtspraxis der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Jahre 1995Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 57 1997 923Google Scholar
Constitutionalism, Universalism and Democracy – A Comparative AnalysisBaden-BadenNomos 1999Google Scholar
The Failure to Prevent Genocide in Rwanda: The Role of BystandersLeidenNijhoff 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht 10 1953 191
Sanctions and Third Parties and the Concept of International Public OrderArchiv des Völkerrechts 30 1992 2Google Scholar
State Bystander ResponsibilityEuropean Journal of International Law 21 2010 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Völkerrechtliche Praxis der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Jahr 2003Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 65 2005 741Google Scholar
Europäisches Völkerrecht der Gegenwart auf den bisherigen GrundlagenBerlinSchroeder 1888Google Scholar
Krisensicherung und Humanitärer Schutz/Crisis Management and Humanitarian Protection, Festschrift für Dieter FleckBerlinBerliner Wissenschafts-Verlag 2004Google Scholar
International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines. Essays in Honour of Yoram DinsteinLeidenNijhoff 2007Google Scholar
Towards Common Interests and Responsibilities: The US–India Civil Nuclear Deal and the International Nonproliferation RegimeYale Journal of International Law 33 2008 447Google Scholar
Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of AggressionEuropean Journal of International Law 18 2007 477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Customary International Humanitarian LawCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Force, Intervention and Neutrality in Contemporary International LawProceedings of the American Society of International Law 1963 147Google Scholar
Die Erscheinungsformen des zwischenstaatlichen Rechts: jus cogens und jus dispositivum im VölkerrechtZeitschrift für Völkerrecht 16 1932 461Google Scholar
Themes and Theories. Selected Essays, Speeches and Writings in International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar
Menschenrechts- und Demokratieklauseln in den vertraglichen Außenbeziehungen der Europäischen GemeinschaftBerlinSpringer 1998Google Scholar
Art. 25 GG und die Anwendung völkerrechtswidrigen ausländischen RechtsZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 49 1989 41Google Scholar
Invoking State Responsibility for Aiding the Commission of International Crimes – Australia, the United States and East TimorMelbourne Journal of International Law 2001 http://mjil.law.unimelb.edu.au/go/issues/issue-archive/volume-Google Scholar
Are EU Trade Sanctions on Burma Compatible with WTO Law?Michigan Journal of International Law 29 2008 165Google Scholar
Observations (sur le rapport de Louis Le Fur sur Reconnaissance, détermination et signification en droit international du domaine laissé par ce dernier à la compétence exclusive de l’Etat)Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International 31 1936 77Google Scholar
The 2008 Cluster Munitions Convention: Stepping Outside the CCW Framework (Again)International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 2009 219Google Scholar
Critical Reflections on the International Humanitarian Law Aspects of the ICJ Wall Advisory OpinionAmerican Journal of International Law 99 2005 102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Address to the Inter-American Bar Association, Havana, Cuba, 27 March 1941American Journal of International Law 35 1941 348Google Scholar
When Soering Went to Iraq … Problems of Jurisdiction, Extraterritorial Effect and Norm Conflicts in Light of the European Court of Human Rights’ Al-Saadoon CaseGoettingen Journal of International Law 1 2009 459Google Scholar
The Case of the Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943International and Comparative Law Quarterly 4 1955 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Reality of International Law – Essays in Honour of Ian BrownlieOxfordOxford University Press 1999Google Scholar
The Responsibility of States for International CrimesOxfordOxford University Press 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le principe de l’or monétaire à propos de l’arrêt de la Cour du 30 juin 1995 dans l’affaire du Timor Oriental (Portugal c. Australie)Revue générale de droit international public 100 1996 673Google Scholar
Der Oslo-Prozess zum Verbot von StreumunitionBerlinStiftung Wissenschaft und Politik 2008Google Scholar
Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 40 2001 63
International Law – A Constitution for Mankind? An Attempt at a Re-Appraisal with an Analysis of Constitutional PrinciplesGerman Yearbook of International Law 50 2007 303Google Scholar
Complicity, Cause and Blame: A Study in the Interpretation of DoctrineCalifornia Law Review 73 1985 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizerische Wirtschaftshilfe und internationale Menschenrechte: Konflikte und Konvergenzen aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht, Studie im Rahmen des NFP ‘Außenpolitik’, Synthesebericht vom 3. März 2000BernSekretariat Nationalfonds 2000Google Scholar
The Undertaking to Respect and Ensure Respect in All Circumstances: From Tiny Seed to Ripening FruitYearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2 1999 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Using Collective Interests to Ensure Human Rights: An Analysis of the Articles on State ResponsibilityNew York University Law Review 79 2002 1902Google Scholar
The Problem of Enforcement in International Law – Countermeasures, the Non-Injured State and the Idea of International CommunityLondonRoutledge 2010Google Scholar
Governance Matters VI: Governance Indicators 1996–2006World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 4280 2007 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractGoogle Scholar
Unrecht und Unrechtsfolge im VölkerrechtZeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 12 1932 481Google Scholar
The Draft Declaration on Rights and Duties of States – Critical RemarksAmerican Journal of International Law 44 1950 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Law of the United Nations – A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental ProblemsLondonStevens 1951Google Scholar
The Dark Sides of Virtue – Reassessing International HumanitarianismPrinceton, NJ:Princeton University Press 2004Google Scholar
Die Durchsetzung der Genfer Abkommen von 1949 in nicht-internationalen bewaffneten Konflikten auf Grundlage ihres gemeinsamen Art. 1BerlinDuncker & Humblot 2001Google Scholar
The Duty to “Ensure Respect” Under Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions: Its Implications on International and Non-International Armed ConflictsGerman Yearbook of International Law 44 2001 489Google Scholar
Ethical Dimensions of the Foreign Policy of the European Union – A Legal AppraisalCambridgeCambridge University Press 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicherheitszaun oder Apartheidmauer? Das Gutachten des Internationalen Gerichtshofs vom 9. Juli 2004 zu den israelischen Sperranlagen gegenüber dem WestjordanlandDie Friedenswarte 79 2004 345Google Scholar
Lois et usages de la neutralité d’après le droit international conventionnel et coutumier des Etats civilizesParisChevalier-Marescq 1898Google Scholar
Die Nichtanerkennungspolitik der Vereinten Nationen gegenüber den in die Unabhängigkeit entlassenen südafrikanisZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 39 1979 469Google Scholar
Statusverträge im Völkerrecht – Rechtsfragen territorialer SonderregimeBerlinSpringer 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staatsrecht – Völkerrecht – Europarecht. Festschrift für Hans-Jürgen SchlochauerBerlinde Gruyter 1981Google Scholar
Responsibility for Serious Breaches of Obligations Deriving from Peremptory Norms of International Law and United Nations LawEuropean Journal of International Law 13 2002 1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht: Konstruktion und Elemente einer idealistischen VölkerrechtslehreBerlinSpringer 2011Google Scholar
The Diversification and Fragmentation of International LawCambridge:T. M. C. Asser Press 2011Google Scholar
La bonne foi en droit international public: contribution à l’étude des principes généraux de droitParisPresses universitaires de France 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Théorie du ius cogens international: essai du relecture du conceptParisPresses universitaires de France 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International LawNetherlands International Law Review 50 2003 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Interprétation et création du droit international – Esquisse d’une herméneutique juridique moderne pour le droit international publicBrusselsBruylant 2006Google Scholar
Principles as Sources of International Law (With Special Reference to Good Faith)Netherlands International Law Review 53 2006 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Politics of International LawEuropean Journal of International Law 1 1990 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The International Court of Justice, International Law and Nuclear WeaponsCambridgeCambridge University Press 1999Google Scholar
2001
The Gentle Civilizer of Nations – The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960CambridgeCambridge University Press 2002Google Scholar
From Apology to Utopia – The Structure of International Legal Argument, Reissue with a New EpilogueCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005Google Scholar
International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and RenewalEuropean Journal of International Law 16 2005 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and PoliticsModern Law Review 70 2007 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Politics of International Law – 20 Years LaterEuropean Journal of International Law 20 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern AnxietiesLeiden Journal of International Law 15 2002 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anmerkung zu Generalbundesanwalt, Entschließung v. 21.3.2003 zu § 80 StGBJuristenzeitung 2003 911Google Scholar
The German Chief Federal Prosecutor’s Decision Not to Investigate the Alleged Crime of Preparing Aggression Against IraqJournal of International Criminal Justice 2 2004 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Die Verantwortlichkeit Deutschlands nach der EMRK für seine Streitkräfte im AuslandseinsatzZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 62 2002 669Google Scholar
A Credibility Gap: The Behrami and Saramati Decision of the European Court of Human RightsJournal of International Peacekeeping 13 2009 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Law in National Courts: The International Rule of Law and the Limits of the Internationalist ModelVirginia Journal of International Law 44 2003 19Google Scholar
The Nottebohm Judgment (Second Phase)American Journal of International Law 54 1960 536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vom Umgang des Rechtsstaats mit Unrechtsregimes – Völker- und landesrechtliche Grenzen des Verhaltensspielraums der schweizerischen Außenpolitik gegenüber Völkerrecht missachtenden StaatenBernStämpfli 2008Google Scholar
Complicity – Ethics and Law for a Collective AgeCambridgeCambridge University Press 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of LawOxfordOxford University Press 2002Google Scholar
Responsabilité des Etats pour actes accomplis en application du Chapitre VII de la Charte des Nations UniesRevue générale de droit international public 112 2008 85Google Scholar
Attribution of Conduct in Peace Operations: The “Ultimate Authority and Control” TestEuropean Journal of International Law 19 2008 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Territorial Non-Application” of the European Convention on Human RightsNordic Journal of International Law 78 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Contemporary Practice of the United Kingdom in the Field of International Law – Survey and CommentInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 7 1958 514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Practice in International Law in 1965LondonBritish Institute for International and Comparative Law 1967Google Scholar
Refugee Protection in International Law – UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International ProtectionCambridgeCambridge University Press 2003Google Scholar
Private Law Sources and Analogies in International LawLondonLongmans, Green and Co. 1927Google Scholar
International Law Being the Collected Papers of Hersch LauterpachtCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005Google Scholar
International Law Being the Collected Papers of Hersch LauterpachtCambridgeCambridge University Press 1978Google Scholar
International Law Being the Collected Papers of Hersch LauterpachtCambridgeCambridge University Press 1970Google Scholar
The Grotian Tradition in International LawBritish Year Book of International Law 23 1946 1Google Scholar
Individual Liability of Private Military Personnel under International Criminal LawEuropean Journal of International Law 19 2008 1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das Verbot der Willkür und des Ermessensmißbrauchs im völkerrechtlichen Verkehr der StaatenZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1 1929 77Google Scholar
Comment: Third States and International Measures Against TerrorismArchiv des Völkerrechts 30 1992 55Google Scholar
Die Auswirkungen der Menschenrechtsverletzungen in Surinam auf die Vertragsbeziehungen zwischen den Niederlanden und SurinamZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 44 1984 64Google Scholar
Völkerrechtliche Praxis der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Jahre 1982Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 44 1984 495Google Scholar
State Responsibility and the Primary–Secondary Rules Terminology – The Role of Language for an Understanding of the International Legal SystemNordic Journal of International Law 78 2009 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Der territoriale Anwendungsbereich der Grund- und Menschenrechte – Zugleich ein Beitrag zum Individualschutz in bewaffneten KonfliktenBerlinBerliner Wissenschafts-Verlag 2005Google Scholar
The Role of Law in International Politics – Essays in International Relations and International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2000Google Scholar
The Iraq Crisis: What Now?International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52 2003 859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fundamental Norms in Contemporary International LawCanadian Yearbook of International Law 25 1987 115Google Scholar
Wege zur Koordinierung völkerrechtlicher Verträge – Völkervertragsrechtliche und institutionelle AnsätzeBerlinSpringer 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar
Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights LawModern Law Review 70 2007 598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International LawEuropean Journal of International Law 12 2001 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Die Doktrinen US-amerikanischer Sicherheitspolitik – Völkerrechtliche Bewertung und ihr Einfluss auf das VölkerrechtBaden-BadenNomos 2006Google Scholar
Domestizierung des Leviathan? Südostasiens Verfassungen und ASEAN’s neues Homogenitätskriterium demokratischer Verfassungsstaatlichkeit’Verfassung und Recht in Übersee 41 2008 534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Law in the Age of Human Rights – General Course on Public International LawRecueil des Cours 301 2003 9Google Scholar
Unlawful Territorial Situations in International Law – Reconciling Effectiveness, Legality and LegitimacyLeidenNijhoff 2006Google Scholar
State Responsibility for GenocideEuropean Journal of International Law 17 2006 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-UpEuropean Journal of International Law 18 2007 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
From Compromise to Principle: Clarifying the Concept of State Jurisdiction in Human Rights TreatiesHuman Rights Law Review 8 2008 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confidentiality and Third Party ParticipationArbitration International 21 2005 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saadi v. Italy – The Rules of the Game Have Not ChangedHuman Rights Law Review 8 2008 534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to Which the United States Has Been a PartyWashington DCGovernment Printing Office 1898
Causation and Responsibility – An Essay in Law, Morals and MetaphysicsOxfordOxford University Press 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legal Issues in the Nicaragua OpinionAmerican Journal of International Law 81 1987 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Völkerrechtliche Praxis der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Jahre 1959Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 21 1961 259Google Scholar
The Signing of the US–India Agreement Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear EnergyGoettingen Journal of International Law 1 2009 179Google Scholar
International Law: Theory and Practice. Essays in Honour of Eric SuyThe HagueNijhoff 1998Google Scholar
Confronting State Complicity in International LawUCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 7 2002 99Google Scholar
International Responsibility Today – Essays in Memory of Oscar SchachterLeidenNijhoff 2005Google Scholar
International Pluralism and the Rule of LawReview of International Studies 26 2000 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theorising the International Rule of LawReview of International Studies 34 2008 385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Rights and Duties of Neutrals – A General HistoryManchesterManchester University Press 2000Google Scholar
War and the Law of Nations – A General HistoryCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das Rechtsmißbrauchsverbot im heutigen Völkerrecht – Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung und Anwendbarkeit eines BegriffesBerlinDuncker & Humblot 1984Google Scholar
Ius Humanitas – Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Alfred VerdrossBerlinDuncker & Humblot 1980Google Scholar
Völkerrechtlicher Vertrag und “DrittstaatenBerichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 29 1988 51Google Scholar
Concurrence Between Individual Responsibility and State Responsibility in International LawInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 52 2003 615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Internationally Wrongful Acts in Domestic CourtsAmerican Journal of International Law 101 2007 760Google Scholar
Eingreifen auf Einladung – Zur Zulässigkeit des Einsatzes fremder Truppen im internen Konflikt auf Einladung der RegierungBerlinSpringer 1999Google Scholar
Kosovo und Konstitutionalisierung: Zur humanitären Intervention der NATO-StaatenZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 59 1999 941Google Scholar
From Dionisio Anzilotti to Roberto Ago: The Classical International Law of State Responsibility and the Traditional Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-State RelationsEuropean Journal of International Law 13 2002 1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovereignty as Responsibility?Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 99 2005 389Google Scholar
Das Verfassungsrecht vor den Herausforderungen der GlobalisierungVeröffentlichungen der Vereinigung deutscher Staatsrechtslehrer 67 2007 129Google Scholar
Im Dienste des Menschen: Recht, Staat und Staatengemeinschaft. Forschungskolloquium anlässlich der Emeritierung von Eckart KleinBerlinDuncker & Humblot 2009Google Scholar
Equivocal Helpers – Complicit States, Mixed Messages, and International LawInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 2009 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The United Nations Convention Against Torture – A CommentaryOxfordOxford University Press 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Severable LiabilityYale Journal of International Law 13 1988 225Google Scholar
The Power and Purpose of International Law – Insights from the Theory and Practice of EnforcementOxfordOxford University Press 2008Google Scholar
Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdictions – Problems and Possible SolutionsMax Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 5 2001 67Google Scholar
Ursprünge der Neutralität. Die Herausbildung des Instituts der Neutralität im Völkerrecht der frühen NeuzeitZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 48 1988 447Google Scholar
State Responsibility for Transboundary Air Pollution in International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congo’s War: The Legal Dimension of a Protracted ConflictBritish Year Book of International Law 77 2006 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Monetary Gold Decision in PerspectiveAmerican Journal of International Law 49 1955 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Immunity and International Public OrderGerman Yearbook of International Law 45 2002 227Google Scholar
Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human RightsEuropean Journal of International Law 14 2003 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Public Order and the International Court’s Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian TerritoryArchiv des Völkerrechts 43 2005 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Immunity and International Public Order RevisitedGerman Yearbook of International Law 49 2006 327Google Scholar
State Immunity and Hierarchy of Norms: Why the House of Lords Got It WrongEuropean Journal of International Law 18 2007 955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Rule of Law Beyond the State: Failures, Promises, and TheoryInternational Journal of Constitutional Law 7 2009 442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Les Conventions de Vienne sur le droit des traités – Commentaire article par articleBrusselsBruylant 2006Google Scholar
The Sources and Evidence of International LawManchesterManchester University Press 1965Google Scholar
Die internationale Gemeinschaft im Völkerrecht: eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung des Völkerrechts im Zeitalter der GlobalisierungMunichC. H. Beck 2001Google Scholar
International Law After Postmodernism: Towards Renewal or Decline of International Law?Leiden Journal of International Law 14 2001 727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The War Against Iraq and the Future of International Law: Hegemony or Pluralism?Michigan Journal of International Law 25 2004 691Google Scholar
Jus Cogens in a Time of Hegemony and FragmentationNordic Journal of International Law 74 2005 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2007Google Scholar
Zur Zukunft der Völkerrechtswissenschaft in Deutschland: Zwischen Konstitutionalisierung und Fragmentierung des VölkerrechtsZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 67 2007 695Google Scholar
Ruling the World – Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global GovernmentCambridgeCambridge University Press 2009Google Scholar
Federal Jurisdiction over Extraterritorial Acts of Terrorism and Nonimmunity for Foreign Violators of International Law under the FISA and the Act of State DoctrineVirginia Journal of International Law 23 1983 191Google Scholar
Conflict of Norms in Public International Law – How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International LawCambridgeCambridge University Press 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights and the Rule of Law – What’s the Relationship?Georgetown Journal of International Law 36 2005 810Google Scholar
Can a State Commit a Crime? Definitely, Yes!European Journal of International Law 10 1999 425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Les articles de la CDI sur la responsabilité internationale de l’Etat pour fait internationalement illicite suite – et fin?Annuaire français de droit international 43 2002 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A CommentaryOxfordOxford University Press 2006Google Scholar
Droit international de la responsabilité et droits de l’homme – A propos de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme du 8 juillet 2004 dans l’affaire Ilascu et autres c. la République de Moldova et la Fédération de RussieRevue générale de droit international public 109 2005 581Google Scholar
The Growth of International Law between Globalization and the Great PowerAustrian Review of International and European Law 8 2003 109Google Scholar
Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and StructuresLeiden Journal of International Law 19 2006 579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humanity as the A and Ώ of SovereigntyEuropean Journal of International Law 20 2009 513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Der Wandel des ungeschriebenen Völkerrechts im Zuge der KonstitutionalisierungArchiv des Völkerrechts 46 2008 502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commentaire – IV La Convention de Genève relative à la protection des personnes civiles en temps de guerreGenevaInternational Committee of the Red Cross 1956
The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of International Responsibility of StatesGerman Yearbook of International Law 35 1992 9Google Scholar
Le problème des limitations de la souverainté et la théorie de l’abus des droit dans les rapports internationauxRecueil des Cours 6 1925 1Google Scholar
Complicity in International Law: A New Direction in the Law of State ResponsibilityBritish Year Book of International Law 57 1986 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western WorldCambridgeCambridge University Press 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Court of Justice as a Forum for Genocide CasesCase Western Reserve Journal of International Law 40 2007 243Google Scholar
OxfordOxford University Press 1997
Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal ResponsibilityYale Law Journal 111 2003 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Predator and Prey: Seizing and Killing Suspected Terrorists AbroadJournal of Political Philosophy 15 2007 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staatsrecht – Völkerrecht – Europarecht: Festschrift für Hans-Jürgen SchlochauerBerlinde Gruyter 1981Google Scholar
Verantwortlichkeit der Staaten für völkerrechtswidriges VerhaltenBerichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 24 1984 7Google Scholar
Nullity and Revision – The Review and Enforcement of International Judgments and AwardsNew Haven, CT:Yale University Press 1971Google Scholar
Wertordnung und Grundgesetz – Das Grundgesetz im Kontext grenzüberschreitender KonstitutionalisierungTübingenMohr Siebeck 2007Google Scholar
Die Humanisierung des Völkerrechts durch das ius in bello – Von der Marten’schenZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 68 2008 111Google Scholar
The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar
International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar SchachterLeidenNijhoff 2005Google Scholar
The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine and TheoryThe HagueNijhoff 1983Google Scholar
oyuntura, Contexto y Propriedades. Un primer esbozoAnuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 7 2007 675Google Scholar
International Responsibility Today – Essays in Memory of Oscar SchachterLeidenNijhoff 2005Google Scholar
The Law and Practice of the International Court of Justice 1920–2005LeidenNijhoff 2006Google Scholar
Le caractère artificiel de la théorie de l’abus de droit en droit international publicNeuchâtelEditions de la Baconnière 1958Google Scholar
Treaties and Third States: A Study in the Reinforcement of the Consensual Standards in International LawZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 35 1975 1Google Scholar
The Concept of Jus Cogens in the Law of TreatiesAmsterdamNorth-Holland Publishing Company 1976Google Scholar
Im Dienste des Menschen: Recht, Staat und Staatengemeinschaft. Forschungskolloquium anlässlich der Emeritierung von Eckart KleinBerlinDuncker & Humblot 2009Google Scholar
Neutrality at Sea in Transition: State Practice in the Gulf War as Emerging International Customary LawOcean Development and International Law 19 1988 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do BITs Really Work? An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand BargainHarvard International Law Journal 46 2005 67Google Scholar
International Rule of Law: Extraordinary Rendition, Complicity and Its ConsequencesEuropean Human Rights Law Review 2006 411Google Scholar
State Responsibility for Violations of International Humanitarian LawInternational Review of the Red Cross 84 2002 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006
Attempts to Define Terrorism in International LawNetherlands International Law Review 52 2003 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Complicité de l’Etat dans la perpétration d’actes de génocide: Les notions contiguës et la nature de la normeAnnuaire français de droit international 53 2007 280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Rule of Law as a Law of RulesUniversity of Chicago Law Review 56 1989 1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechtsfragen der internationalen Organisation. Festschrift für Hans WehbergFrankfurt/MainKlostermann 1956Google Scholar
Enforcing International Humanitarian Law: Catching the AccomplicesInternational Review of the Red Cross 83 2001 439Google Scholar
An Introduction to the International Criminal CourtCambridgeCambridge University Press 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compliance, Complicity, and the Nature of Nonideal ConditionsJournal of Philosophy 100 2003 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naturrechtliche Strömungen im heutigen VölkerrechtZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 13 1950 556Google Scholar
Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewährung – Festschrift für Rudolf BernhardtBerlinSpringer 1995Google Scholar
Freiheit durch Eingriffsabwehr – Rekonstruktion der klassischen GrundrechtsfunktionEuropäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 11 1984 457Google Scholar
Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum EuropaeumBerlinDuncker & Humblot 1997Google Scholar
Das Konsensprinzip in der internationalen GerichtsbarkeitFrankfurt/MainPeter Lang 2003Google Scholar
Internationale Rechtsgarantien – Ausbau und Sicherung der zwischenstaatlichen BeziehungenHamburgBroschek 1918Google Scholar
Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 62 2002 703
Uses and Abuses of the “Abuse of Rights”, in International LawTransactions of the Grotius Society 46 1952 147Google Scholar
Self-Determination Undetermined: The Case of East TimorLeiden Journal of International Law 9 1996 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Evolving International Regime of Nuclear Non-ProliferationRecueil des Cours 321 2006 9Google Scholar
Kontinent der Gewalt – Europas langer Weg zum FriedenBonnBundeszentrale für politische Bildung 2008Google Scholar
Righting Wrongs: Reparations in the Articles on State ResponsibilityAmerican Journal of International Law 96 2002 832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normative Hierarchy in International LawAmerican Journal of International Law 100 2006 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Les réactions décentralisées à l’illicite – Des contremesures à la légitime défenseParisLGDJ 1990Google Scholar
Grundfragen der Staatenverantwortlichkeit in der Arbeit der International Law CommissionArchiv des Völkerrechts 24 1985 357Google Scholar
The Antarctic Treaty as a Treaty Providing for an “Objective RégimeCornell International Law Journal 19 1986 189Google Scholar
International Law at a Time of Perplexity – Essays in Honour of Shabtai RosenneDordrechtNijhoff 1989Google Scholar
From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International LawRecueil des Cours 250 1994 217Google Scholar
The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General PrinciplesAustralian Yearbook of International Law 12 1992 82Google Scholar
Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International LawEuropean Journal of International Law 17 2006 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal OrderCambridgeCambridge University Press 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry and Its Ramifications for International SecurityInternational Security 26 2001 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56 2007 695Google Scholar
The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International LawOxfordOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar
Beyond National Borders: States’ Human Rights Obligations in International CooperationAntwerpIntersentia 2006Google Scholar
State Responsibility and the Marine Environment – The Rules of DecisionOxfordOxford University Press 1988Google Scholar
2009 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397249
Les sources du droit international – Etude sur la jurisprudence de la Cour permanente de la Justice internationaleCopenhagenMunskgaard 1946Google Scholar
International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear WeaponsCambridgeCambridge University Press 1999Google Scholar
International Crimes of State: A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State ResponsibilityBerlinde Gruyter 1989Google Scholar
From One Codification to Another: Bilateralism and Multilateralism in the Genesis of the Codification of the Law of Treaties and the Law of State ResponsibilityEuropean Journal of International Law 13 2002 1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Norm?American Journal of International Law 101 2007 99Google Scholar
International Measures Against Terrorism and Sanctions By and Against Third StatesArchiv des Völkerrechts 30 1992 38Google Scholar
Das völkerrechtliche Delikt (= Handbuch des Völkerrechts, Dritter Band, Erste Abteilung a)StuttgartKohlhammer 1920Google Scholar
Jus Cogens and the Vienna Convention on the Law of TreatiesViennaSpringer 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Cyprus Question before the European Court of JusticeEuropean Journal of International Law 12 2001 727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga OmnesLeidenNijhoff 2006Google Scholar
On the Rule of Law – History, Politics, TheoryCambridgeCambridge University Press 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 62 2002 759
Do Serious Breaches Give Rise to Any Specific Obligations of the Responsible State?European Journal of International Law 13 2002 1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International LawCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A CommentaryOxfordOxford University Press 2006Google Scholar
Buchbesprechung (Alexander Orakhelashvili, Peremptory Norms, 2006)Verfassung und Recht in Übersee 40 2007 380Google Scholar
The Federation Shall Accede to Agreements Providing for General and Compulsory International Arbitration” – The German Optional Clause Declaration of 1 May 2008German Yearbook of International Law 51 2008 391Google Scholar
Netherlands State Practice for the Parliamentary Year 2002–2003Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 35 2004 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netherlands State Practice for the Parliamentary Year 2005–2006Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 38 2007 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Content of the Rule Against Abuse of Rights in International LawBritish Year Book of International Law 46 1972 323Google Scholar
Humanity’s Law: Rule of Law for the New Global PoliticsCornell International Law Journal 35 2002 355Google Scholar
Humanitarian Intervention – Ethical, Legal and Political DilemmasCambridgeCambridge University Press 2003 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Burden and Standard of Proof in the European Court of Human RightsGerman Yearbook of International Law 50 2007 543Google Scholar
The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, Part NineBritish Year Book of International Law 69 1998 1Google Scholar
International Responsibility Today – Essays in Memory of Oscar SchachterLeidenNijhoff 2005Google Scholar
La Cour européenne de droits de l’homme et les immunités juridictionelles d’Etats – Observations sous les arrêts McElhinney, Fogarty et al-AdsaniRevue belge de droit international 34 2001 526Google Scholar
Völkerrechtlicher Vertrag und DrittstaatenBerichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 28 1988 9Google Scholar
Obligations Arising for States Without or Against Their WillRecueil des Cours 241 1993 195Google Scholar
International Law: Theory and Practice. Essays in Honour of Eric SuyThe HagueKluwer 1998Google Scholar
International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century: General Course on Public International LawRecueil des Cours 281 1999 9Google Scholar
L’immunité des Etats en cas de violations graves des droits de l’hommeRevue générale de droit international public 109 2005 51Google Scholar
The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A CommentaryOxfordOxford University Press 2006Google Scholar
Internationale Terrorismusbekämpfung als Herausforderung für das VölkerrechtDie Öffentliche Verwaltung 2006 357Google Scholar
Reparation in Cases of GenocideJournal of International Criminal Justice 5 2007 905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case Note: R (on the Application of al-Jedda) v. Secretary of State for Defence – Human Rights in a Multi-Level System of Governance and the Internment of Suspected TerroristsMelbourne Journal of International Law 10 2008 http://mjil.law.unimelb.edu.au/go/issues/ issue-archive/volume-Google Scholar
International Law: Theory and Practice. Essays in Honour of Eric SuyThe HagueKluwer 1998Google Scholar
A Return to Communitarianism? Reacting to “Serious Breaches of Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law” under the Law of State Responsibility and United Nations LawCanadian Yearbook of International Law 42 2004 197Google Scholar
Globalization, Order and the Rule of LawFinnish Yearbook of International Law 11 2000 247Google Scholar
The Stimson Doctrine of Non-Recognition: Its Historical Genesis and Influence on Contemporary International LawChinese Journal of International Law 2 2003 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian LawCambridgeCambridge University Press 2007Google Scholar
The Traditional Law of Neutrality in a Changing EnvironmentAmerican University International Law Review 14 1998 83Google Scholar
Die Stationierung fremder Truppen im Völkerrecht und ihre demokratische Kontrolle – Eine Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung GeorgiensBerlinDuncker & Humblot 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le droit des gens ou principes de la loi naturelle appliqués à la conduite et aux affaires des Nations et de SouverainsWashington, DC:Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1916Google Scholar
Forbidden Treaties in International LawAmerican Journal of International Law 31 1937 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La neutralité dans le cadre de l’ONU particulièrement celle de la République d’AutricheRevue générale de droit international public 61 1957 177Google Scholar
Entstehungsweisen und Geltungsgrund des universellen völkerrechtlichen GewohnheitsrechtsZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 29 1969 635Google Scholar
La reconnaissance internationale dans la pratique contemporaine – Les relations publiques internationalesParisPedone 1973Google Scholar
La reconnaissance internationale: déclin ou renouveau?Annuaire Français de Droit International 39 1993 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exercising Diplomatic Protection – The Fine Line Between Litigation, Demarches and Consular AssistanceZeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 66 2006 321Google Scholar
L’émergence de la communauté internationale dans la responsabilité des EtatsParisPresses universitaires de France 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Legal Dimension of the International Community: How Community Interests Are Protected in International LawEuropean Journal of International Law 21 2010 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Customary International Law and Treaties – A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of SourcesThe HagueKluwer 1997Google Scholar
Handbuch des SeerechtsMunichC. H. Beck 2006
The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International LawRecueil des Cours 81 1952 451Google Scholar
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1323383
Silent Accomplice – The Untold Story of France’s Role in Rwandan GenocideLondonI. B. Tauris 2006Google Scholar
L’arrêt sur le génocide: Le souffle de l’avis de 1951 n’a pas transporté la CourRevue générale de droit international public 111 2007 305Google Scholar
The International Criminal Court: An American ViewEuropean Journal of International Law 10 1999 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?American Journal of International Law 77 1983 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cours général de droit international public: le droit international en quête de son identitéRecueil des Cours 237 1992 9Google Scholar
US–India Nuclear Cooperation – Better Later Than SoonerNonproliferation Review 14 2007 429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, Vol. 3, WTO – Technical Barriers and SPS MeasuresLeidenNijhoff 2007Google Scholar
Das Gesetz der funktionellen Verdoppelung: Beitrag zu einer universalistischen Theorie des Internationalprivat- und VölkerrechtsSaarbrückenWest-Ost-Verlag 1955Google Scholar
International Territorial Administration: How Trusteeship and the Civilizing Mission Never Went AwayOxfordOxford University Press 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law – Towards a New Merger in International LawLeidenNijhoff 2008Google Scholar
Non-Proliferation Treaty: Framework for Nuclear Arms ControlCharlottesville, VAMichie Company 1969Google Scholar
International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph SchreuerOxfordOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar
Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes – Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. MensahLeidenNijhoff 2007Google Scholar
From “State Crime” to “Serious Breaches of Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law”European Journal of International Law 13 2002 1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The News That Opinio Juris “Is Not a Necessary Element of Customary [International] Law” Is Greatly ExaggeratedGerman Yearbook of International Law 43 2000 227Google Scholar
Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 55 1995 1051
Judge Alejandro Álvarez at the International Court of Justice (1946–1955): His Theory of a “New International Law” and Judicial Law-MakingLeiden Journal of International Law 19 2006 1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar