Book contents
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Ovarian Cancer Following Use of Clomiphene and Gonadotropin in Assisted Reproduction
- 2 Congenital Anomalies Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 3 Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
- 4 Minimizing Multiple Pregnancy After Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 5 Prevention of Multiple Pregnancy after IUI and Ovarian Stimulation
- 6 Obstetric Complications of Twin Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 7 Selection of a Single Embryo for Transfer
- 8 Complications of Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproduction
- 9 Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
- 10 Complications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Assisted Reproduction Technology
- 11 Classification and Pathophysiology of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 12 Genetics of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 13 Prediction and Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 14 Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 15 Elimination of OHSS by GnRH Agonist and Freezing Embryos
- 16 Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART
- 17 Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
- 18 Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
- 19 Impediments, Challenges, and Hurdles for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons Seeking Reproductive Medicine
- 20 Political Emotions and Reproductive Medicine From Individual Suffering to European Regulation
- Index
- References
9 - Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2017
Book contents
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Ovarian Cancer Following Use of Clomiphene and Gonadotropin in Assisted Reproduction
- 2 Congenital Anomalies Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 3 Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
- 4 Minimizing Multiple Pregnancy After Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 5 Prevention of Multiple Pregnancy after IUI and Ovarian Stimulation
- 6 Obstetric Complications of Twin Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 7 Selection of a Single Embryo for Transfer
- 8 Complications of Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproduction
- 9 Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
- 10 Complications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Assisted Reproduction Technology
- 11 Classification and Pathophysiology of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 12 Genetics of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 13 Prediction and Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 14 Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 15 Elimination of OHSS by GnRH Agonist and Freezing Embryos
- 16 Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART
- 17 Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
- 18 Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
- 19 Impediments, Challenges, and Hurdles for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons Seeking Reproductive Medicine
- 20 Political Emotions and Reproductive Medicine From Individual Suffering to European Regulation
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction , pp. 86 - 97Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Salama, S, Torre, A, Paillusson, B, et al. Ovarian stimulation monitoring: past, present and perspectives. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2011;39(4):245–54.Google Scholar
Lass, A, Brinsden, P. The role of ovarian volume in reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(3):256–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forman, R G, Robinson, J, Yudkin, P, et al. What is the true follicular diameter – an assessment of the reproducibility of transvaginal ultrasound monitoring in stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(5):989–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ata, B, Seyhan, A, Reinblatt, S L, et al. Comparison of automated and manual follicle monitoring in an unrestricted population of 100 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(1):127–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ata, B, Tulandi, T. Ultrasound automated volume calculation in reproduction and in pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2163–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shmorgun, D, Hughes, E, Mohide, P, Roberts, R. Prospective cohort study of three- versus two-dimensional ultrasound for prediction of oocyte maturity. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(4):1333–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raine-Fenning, N, Deb, S, Jayaprakasan, K, et al. Timing of oocyte maturation and egg collection during controlled ovarian stimulation: a randomized controlled trial evaluating manual and automated measurements of follicle diameter. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):184–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raine-Fenning, N, Jayaprakasan, K, Clewes, J. Automated follicle tracking facilitates standardization and may improve work flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(7):1015–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deb, S, Kannamannadiar, J, Campbell, B K, Clewes, J S, Raine-Fenning, N J. The interovarian variation in three-dimensional ultrasound markers of ovarian reserve in women undergoing baseline investigation for subfertility. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):667–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deb, S, Campbell, B K, Clewes, J S, et al. Intracycle variation in number of antral follicles stratified by size and in endocrine markers of ovarian reserve in women with normal ovulatory menstrual cycles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(2):216–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirckx, K, Cabri, P, Merien, A, et al. Does low-dose aspirin improve pregnancy rate in IVF/ICSI? A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(4):856–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Jayaprakasan, K, Walker, K F, Clewes, J S, Johnson, I R, Raine-Fenning, N J. The interobserver reliability of off-line antral follicle counts made from stored three-dimensional ultrasound data: a comparative study of different measurement techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(3):335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, S, Batcha, M, Campbell, B K, et al. The predictive value of the automated quantification of the number and size of small antral follicles in women undergoing ART. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2124–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salama, S, Arbo, E, Lamazou, F, et al. Reproducibility and reliability of automated volumetric measurement of single preovulatory follicles using SonoAVC. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(6):2069–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigue-Fuentes, A, Hernandez, J, Garcia-Guzman, R, et al. Prospective evaluation of automated follicle monitoring in 58 in vitro fertilization cycles: follicular volume as a new indicator of oocyte maturity. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):616–20.Google Scholar
Raine-Fenning, N, Jayaprakasan, K, Clewes, J, et al. SonoAVC: a novel method of automatic volume calculation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):691–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raine-Fenning, N, Jayaprakasan, K, Deb, S, et al. Automated follicle tracking improves measurement reliability in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(5):658–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutch, T D, Joergner, I, Matson, D O, et al. Automated assessment of ovarian follicles using a novel three-dimensional ultrasound software. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1562–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deb, S, Jayaprakasan, K, Campbell, B K, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of automated antral follicle counts made using three-dimensional ultrasound and SonoAVC. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(4):477–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bland, J M, Altman, D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Deutch, T D, Abuhamad, A Z, Matson, D O, et al. Automated calculation of ovarian follicular diameters using three dimensional sonography in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): a prospective evaluation of a novel software. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:S80.Google Scholar
Pan, P, Chen, X, Li, Y, et al. Comparison of manual and automated measurements of monodominant follicle diameter with different follicle size in infertile patients. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, A, Guillen, J J, Lopez, M J, et al. Learning curves in 3-dimensional sonographic follicle monitoring during controlled ovarian stimulation. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(4):649–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandekerckhove, F, Vansteelandt, S, Gerris, J, De Sutter, P. Follicle measurements using sonography-based automated volume count accurately predict the yield of mature oocytes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;76(2):107–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revelli, A, Martiny, G, Delle Piane, L, et al. A critical review of bi-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound techniques to monitor follicle growth: do they help improving IVF outcome? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G, Ombelet, W. Coming soon to your clinic: patient-friendly ART. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2075–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan, I, Bhattacharya, S, Kang, A, Woolner, A. Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(8):CD005289.Google ScholarPubMed
Bosch, E, Labarta, E, Crespo, J, et al. Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2092–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, Y, Bentley, G R, Gann, P H, Hodges, K R, Chatterton, R T. Salivary estradiol and progesterone levels in conception and nonconception cycles in women: evaluation of a new assay for salivary estradiol. Fertil Steril. 1998;71:863–68.Google Scholar
Gerris, J, Geril, A, De Sutter, P. Patient acceptance of self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET): a step towards more patient friendly ART? Facts Views Vision Ob/Gyn. 2009;1:161–70.Google Scholar
Gerris, J, de Sutter, P. Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET): a step towards more patient-centered ART? Hum Reprod. 2010;25:562–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:265–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makuch, M Y, Bahamondes, L. Barriers to access to infertility care and assisted reproductive technology within the public health sector in Brazil. Facts Views Vision Ob/Gyn. 2012;4:221–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Cooke, I, Gianaroli, L, Hovatta, O, Trounson, A O. Affordable ART and the Third World: difficulties to overcome. ESHRE Monogr. 2008;2008(1):93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ombelet, W, Campo, R, Frydman, R, et al. The Arusha project: accessible infertility care in developing countries – a reasonable option? Facts Views Vision Ob/Gyn. 2010;Monograph:107–15.Google Scholar
Bates, D W, Gawande, A A. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2526–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmerman, D, Testa, A C, Bourne, T, et al. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:681–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dondorp, W, de Wert, G. Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsabilities. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1604–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar