Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:25:10.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Blood Is a Very Special Juice”: Racialized Bodies and Citizenship in Twentieth-Century Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Eileen Boris
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Angelique Janssens
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

The 1999 plan of the Social Democratic government to adjust Germany's 1913 nationality law has generated an intensely emotional debate. In an unprecedented action, the opposition Christian Democrats managed to gather hundreds of thousands of signatures against the adjustment that would have granted citizenship to second generation “immigrants” born in Germany. At the end of the twentieth century, Germans still strongly cling to the principle of jus sanguinis. The idea that nationality is not connected to place of birth or culture but rather to a “national essence” that is somehow incorporated in the subject's blood has been strong in Germany since the early nineteenth century and has been especially decisive for the country's twentieth-century history.

The myth of blood has intertwined with that of “race”; both imply the heredity of mental traits that connect people otherwise not related. Images of race belong to the West's “deep structure”, voiced in different manners and to different degrees in different political systems and times, but always there. The conjuncture of “race” and “blood” therefore, has proven resistant to political changes. Germany, with its national identity that through almost the whole of the twentieth century and four political systems has been explicitly based on “blood”, is a case in point.

This article explores the roots of the German self-definition in larger Western concepts of identity that are deeply racialized and often manifested through gendered constructions relating to sexuality. Legal exclusion generated by those concepts centered on “race” rather than other possible forms of distinction.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×