Abraham, D, The Collapse of the Weimar Republic: Political Economy and Crisis (New York: Holmes & Meier 1986).Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D and Robinson, JA, The Narrow Corridor (London: Viking Penguin 2019).Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D and Robinson, JA, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty (London: Profile Books 2013).Google Scholar

Adams, W, ‘The Aluminium Case: Legal Victory – Economic Defeat’ (1951) 41(5) The American Economic Review 915–22.Google Scholar

Adams, W, ‘Dissolution, Divorcement, Divestiture: The Pyrrhic Victories of Antitrust’ (1951) 27(1) Indiana Law Journal, 1–37.Google Scholar

Adams, W, ‘The Rule of Reason: Workable Competition or Workable Monopoly’ (1954) 63(3) Yale Law Journal, 348–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, W, The Structure of American Industry (London: Macmillan 1971).Google Scholar

Adelman, MA, ‘Effective Competition and the Antitrust Laws’ (1948) 61(8) Harvard Law Review, 1289–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahlborn, C, Evans, DS, and Padilla, AJ, ‘The Antitrust Economics of Tying: A Farewell to per se Illegality’ (2004) 49(1–2) Antitrust Bulletin, 287–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akman, P, ‘Searching for the Long-Lost Soul of Article 82 EC’ (CCP Working Paper 2007).Google Scholar

Amato, G, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power: The Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market (Oxford: Hart 1997).Google Scholar

Anderson, E, ‘Liberty, Equality and Private Government’ in Matheson, M (ed), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016), 63–122.Google Scholar

Areeda, P and Turner, DF, ‘Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act’ (1975) 88(4) Harvard Law Review, 697–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, T, ‘Fair Fights and Foul: Chapter XIV – The Sherman Act as Charter of Economic Freedom’ (1965) 10(5–6) Antitrust Bulletin, 655–66.Google Scholar

Arnold, TW, ‘The Bottlenecks of Business [1940]’ in Crane, DA and Hovenkamp, H (eds), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (New York: Oxford University Press 2013), 206–20.Google Scholar

Arrow, KJ and Fisher, AC, ‘Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility’ (1974) 88(2) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 312–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Autor, D and others, ‘The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms’ (2020) 135(2) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 645–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, D, ‘Presumptions in EU Competition Law’ (2010) 31(9) European Competition Law Review, 362–69.Google Scholar

Bailey, D, ‘Standard of Proof in EC Merger Proceedings: A Common Law Perspective’ (2003) 40(4) Common Market Law Review, 845–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, JS, Barriers to New Competition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, JS, Industrial Organization (New York: John Wiley & Sons 1959).Google Scholar

Bain, JS, ‘Industrial Organization: Chapter 10 – The Relation of Market Structure to Market Performance’ in Crane, DA and Hovenkamp, H (eds), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (New York: Oxford University Press 2013), 320–37.Google Scholar

Bain, JS, ‘Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936–1940’ (1951) 65(3) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 292–324.Google Scholar

Bain, JS, ‘Workable Competition in Oligopoly: Theoretical Considerations and Some Empirical Evidence’ (1950) 40(2) American Economic Review, 35–47.Google Scholar

Bajgar, M and others, ‘Industry Concentration in Europe and North America’ (OECD Productivity Working Papers 18 2019).Google Scholar

Baker, JB, The Antitrust Paradigm: Restoring a Competitive Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, JB, ‘Recent Developments in Economics That Challenge Chicago School Views’ (1989) 58(2) Antitrust Law Journal, 645–55.Google Scholar

Baker, JB, ‘Taking the Error Out of “Error Cost” Analysis: What’s Wrong with Antitrust’s Right’ (2015) 80(1) Antitrust Law Journal, 1–38.Google Scholar

Balderston, T, Economics and Politics in the Weimar Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002).Google Scholar

Baumol, WJ, ‘Predation and the Logic of the Average Variable Cost Test’ (1996) 39(1) Journal of Law & Economics, 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckner, CF and Salop, SC, ‘Decision Theory and Antitrust Rules’ (1999) 67(1) Antitrust Law Journal, 41–76.Google Scholar

Behrens, P, ‘The Ordoliberal Concept of “Abuse” of a Dominant Position and Its Impact on Article 102 TFEU’ (Discussion Paper No 7/15, 2015).Google Scholar

Bentham, J, ‘Anarchical Fallacies’ in Bowring, J (ed), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Edinburgh: William Tait 1843).Google Scholar

Bentham, J, Theory of Legislation (London: Trübner 1873).Google Scholar

Berle, AA and Means, GC, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Piscataway: Transaction Publishers 1932).Google Scholar

Berlin, I, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ in Hardy, H (ed), Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002), 166–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernanke, BS, ‘Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Cyclical Investment’ (1983) 98(1) The Quarterly Journal of Economics 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernatt, M, Populism and Antitrust: The Illiberal Influence of Populist Government on the Competition Law System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhm, F (ed), Wettbewerb und Monopolkampf: Eine Untersuchung zur Frage des wirtschaftlichen Kampfrechts und zur Frage der rechtlichen Struktur der geltenden Wirtschaftsordnung [1933] (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhm, F, ‘Das Problem der privaten Macht. Ein Beitrag zur Monopolfrage [1928]’ in Goldschmidt, N (ed), Grundtexte zur Freiburger Tradition der Ordnungsökonomik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2008), 49–67.Google Scholar

Böhm, F, ‘Democracy and Economic Power in Cartel and Monopoly in Modern Law [1961]’ in Crane, DA and Hovenkamp, H (eds), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (New York: Oxford University Press 2013), 264–81.Google Scholar

Böhm, F, ‘Die Bedeutung der Wirtschaftsordnung für die politische Verfassung: Kritische Betrachtungen zu dem Aufsatz von Ministerialrat Dr. Adolf ARNDT über das “Problem der Wirtschaftsdemokratie in den Verfassungsentwürfen”’ (1946) 1(6) Süddeutsche Juristen-Zeitung, 141–49.Google Scholar

Böhm, F, Freiheit und Ordnung in der Marktwirtschaft [1971] (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1980).Google Scholar

Böhm, F, ‘Freiheit und Ordnung in der Marktwirtschaft [1971]’ in Goldschmidt, N (ed), Grundtexte zur Freiburger Tradition der Ordnungsökonomik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2008), 299–312.Google Scholar

Böhm, F, ‘Kartellauflösung und Konzernentflechtung: Spezialistenaufgabe oder Schicksalsfrage?’ (1947) 2(9) Süddeutsche Juristen-Zeitung, 495–506.Google Scholar

Böhm, F, ‘Rule of Law in a Market Economy [1966]’ in Peacock, AT and Willgerodt, H (eds), Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution (Houndmill: Macmillan 1989), 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhm, F, Eucken, W, and Großmann-Doerth, H, ‘Unsere Aufgabe (The Ordoliberal Manifesto) [1936]’ in Goldschmidt, N (ed), Grundtexte zur Freiburger Tradition der Ordnungsökonomik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2008), 27–37.Google Scholar

Bok, DC, ‘Section 7 of the Clayton Act and the Merging of Law and Economics’ (1960) 74(2) Harvard Law Review, 226–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, P, Brodley, JF, and Riordan, MH, ‘Predatory Pricing: Strategic Theory and Legal Policy’ (2000) 88(8) Georgetown Law Journal, 2239–330.Google Scholar

Bork, RH, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself [1978] (New York: Maxwell Macmillan 1993).Google Scholar

Bork, RH, ‘The Goals of Antitrust Policy’ (1967) 57(2) The American Economic Review, 242–53.Google Scholar

Bork, RH, ‘Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act’ (1966) 9(1) Journal of Law & Economics, 7–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bork, RH, ‘The Rule of Reason and the Per Se Concept: Price Fixing and Market Division’ (1966) 75(3) The Yale Law Journal, 775–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bork, RH and Bowman, WS Jr., ‘The Crisis in Antitrust’ (1965) 65(3) Columbia Law Journal, 363–73.Google Scholar

Boucoyannis, D, ‘The Equalizing Hand: Why Adam Smith Thought the Market Should Produce Wealth without Steep Inequality’ (2013) 11(4) Perspectives on Politics, 1051–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, WS Jr., ‘Tying Arrangements and the Leverage Problem’ (1957) 67(1) Yale Law Journal, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, RA, The Spirit and Structure of German Fascism (New York: Citadel Press 1971 [1937]).Google Scholar

Brandeis, L, ‘Shall We Abandon the Policy of Competition?: Reprinted from The Curse of Bigness [1934]’ in Crane, DA and Hovenkamp, H (eds), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (New York: Oxford University Press 2013), 185–89.Google Scholar

Brandeis, LD, Other People’s Money: And How the Bankers Use It (New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company 1914).Google Scholar

Brietzke, PH, ‘The Constitutionalization of Antitrust: Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton, and Thomas C. Arthur’ (1987) 22(2) Valparaiso University Law Review, 275–330.Google Scholar

Brodley, JF and Hay, GA, ‘Predatory Pricing: Competing Economic Theories and the Evolution of Legal Standards’ (1980–1981) 66(4) Cornell Law Review, 738–803.Google Scholar

Buchanan, JM, ‘Social Choice, Democracy, and Free Markets’ (1954) 62(2) Journal of Political Economy, 114–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burtis, MM, Gelbach, JB, and Kobayashi, BH, ‘Error Costs, Legal Standards of Proof, and Statistical Significance’ (2017) 25(1) Supreme Court Economic Review, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calabresi, SG and Leibowitz, LC, ‘Monopolies and the Constitution: A History of Crony Capitalism’ (2015) 36(3) Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 983–1098.Google Scholar

Caldwell, B and Montes, L, ‘Friedrich Hayek and His Visits to Chile’ (2015) 28(3) The Review of Austrian Economics, 261–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlisle, K and Gruby, RL, ‘Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons’ (2017) 47(4) Policy Studies Journal, 927–52.Google Scholar

Carter, I, ‘Liberty’ in Bellamy, R and Mason, A (eds), Political Concepts (Manchester: Manchester University Press 2003), 4–15.Google Scholar

Carter, I, A Measure of Freedom (New York: Oxford University Press 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, I and Shnayderman, R, ‘The Impossibility of “Freedom as Independence”’(2019) 17(2) Political Studies Review, 136–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamberlin, E, Theory of Monopolistic Competition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1933).Google Scholar

Chappell, VC (ed), Hobbes and Bramhall: On Liberty and Necessity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Christiansen, A and Kerber, W, ‘Competition Policy with Optimally Differentiated Rules Instead of per se Rules vs. Rule of Reason’ (2006) 2(2) Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 215–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchill, EF, ‘Monopolies’ (1925) 41(3) Law Quarterly Review, 275–96.Google Scholar

Cicchetti, CJ and Freeman, AM, ‘Option Demand and Consumer Surplus: Further Comment’ (1971) 85(3) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 528–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicero, MT, On the Commonwealth and on the Laws (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Clark, JM, ‘Toward a Concept of Workable Competition’ (1940) 30(2) The American Economic Review, 241–56.Google Scholar

Coase, RH, ‘The Federal Communications Commission’ (1959) 2 Journal of Law and Economics, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, RH, ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937) 4(16) Economica, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, RH, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law & Economics, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, WM and Klepper, S, ‘The Tradeoff between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress’ (1992) 4(1) Small Business Economics, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coke, E, Institutes of the Laws of England [1628].Google Scholar

Coke, E, The Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England: Concerning High Treason, and other Please of the Crown and Criminall Causes (London: By M. Flesher for W. Lee and D. Pakeman 1644).Google Scholar

Collins, WD, ‘Trusts and the Origins of Antitrust’ (2013) 81(5) Fordham Law Review, 2279–348.Google Scholar

Collinson, P, ‘The Monarchical Republic of Queen Elizabeth I’ (1987) 69(2) Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 394–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colomo, PI and Lamadrid de Pablo, A, ‘On the Notion of Restriction of Competition: What We Know and What We Do Not Know We Know’ in Gerard, D, Merola, M, and Meyring, B (eds), The Notion of Restriction of Competition: Revisiting the Foundations of Antitrust Enforcement in Europe (Brussles: Bruylant 2017), 333–74.Google Scholar

Constant, B, Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988).Google Scholar

Cowgill, B, Prat, A, and Valletti, T, ‘Political Power and Market Power’ (2021). CEPR Press Discussion Paper No 17178.Google Scholar

Crane, DA, ‘Antitrust and Democracy: A Case Study from German Fascism’ (2018). University of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper No 18-009 https://papers.ssrn.com.Google Scholar

Crane, DA, ‘Fascism and Monopoly’ (2020) 118(7) Michigan Law Review, 1315–70.Google Scholar

Crane, DA, ‘Rules versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication’ (2007) 64(1) Washington and Lee Law Review, 49–110.Google Scholar

Crane, DA, ‘Structuralism: Introduction’ in Crane, DA and Hovenkamp, H (eds), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (New York: Oxford University Press 2013), 318–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, DA and Miralles, G, ‘Toward a Unified Theory of Exclusionary Vertical Restraints’ (2010) 84(3) Southern California Law Review, 605–60.Google Scholar

Dahl, RA, Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press 1989).Google Scholar

Dahl, RA, A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago: Chicago University Press 1956).Google Scholar

Dellis, K and Sondermann, D, ‘Lobbying in Europe: New Firm-level Evidence’ (2017). ECB Working Paper Series No 2071/June 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demsetz, H, ‘Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly’ in Goldschmid, HJ, Mann, HM, and Weston, JF (eds), Industrial Concentration: The New Learning (Boston: Little Brown 1974), 164–83.Google Scholar

Deutscher, E ‘Causation and Counterfactual Analysis in Abuse of Dominance Cases: Lessons from the General Court’s Qualcomm ruling’ (2023) 19(3) European Competition Journal 481–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutscher, E, ‘Reshaping Digital Competition: The New Platform Regulations and the Future of Modern Antitrust’ (2022) 67(2) Antitrust Bulletin, 302–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutscher, E and Makris, S, ‘Exploring the Ordoliberal Paradigm: The Competition-Democracy Nexus’ (2016) 11(2) Competition Law Review, 181–214.Google Scholar

Devlin, A and Jacobs, M, ‘Antitrust Error’ (2010) 52(1) William and Mary Law Review, 75–132.Google Scholar

Di Lorenzo, TJ, ‘The Origins of Antitrust: An Interest-Group Perspective’ (1985) 5(1) International Review of Law and Economics, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diarmuid, J, Hell’s Cartel (London: Bloomsbury 2008).Google Scholar

Director, A and Levi, EH, ‘Law and the Future: Trade Regulation’ (1956) 51(2) Northwestern University Law Review, 281–96.Google Scholar

Douglass, R, ‘Montesquieu and Modern Republicanism’ (2012) 60(3) Political Studies, 703–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowding, K and van Hees, M, ‘The Construction of Rights’ (2003) 97(2) American Political Science Review, 281–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterbrook, FH, ‘The Limits of Antitrust’ (1984) 63(1) Texas Law Review, 1–40.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, FH, ‘Workable Antitrust’ (1986) 84(8) Michigan Law Review, 1696–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Editors, ‘The Industrial Reorganization Act: An Antitrust Proposal to Restructure the American Economy’ (1973) 73(3) Columbia Law Review, 635–76.Google Scholar

Editors, ‘Section 3 of the Clayton Act – “Law Unto Itself”’ (1954) 22(1) University of Chicago Law Review, 233–44.Google Scholar

Edlin, AS, ‘Stopping Above Cost Predatory Pricing’ (2002) 111(4) Yale Law Journal, 941–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrlich, I and Posner, RA, ‘An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking’ (1974) 3(1) The Journal of Legal Studies, 257–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elkins, S and McKitrick, E, The Age of Federalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1993).Google Scholar

Erhard, L, Wohlstand für alle [1957] (Köln: Anaconda 2009).Google Scholar

Eucken, W, ‘Das Problem der wirtschaftlichen Macht’ in Eucken, W and Oswalt, W (eds), Wirtschaftsmacht und Wirtschaftsordnung: Londoner Vorträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik und zwei Beiträge zur Antimonopolpolitik (Münster: Lit 2001), 9–22.Google Scholar

Eucken, W, Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2004).Google Scholar

Eucken, W and Hutchison, TW, ‘On the Theory of the Centrally Administered Economy: An Analysis of the German Experiment. Part I’ (1948) 15(58) Economica, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eucken, W and Hutchison, TW, ‘On the Theory of the Centrally Administered Economy: An Analysis of the German Experiment. Part II’ (1948) 15(59) Economica, 173–93.Google Scholar

Eucken, W and Meyer, FW, ‘The Economic Situation in Germany’ (1948) 260(1) Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, W, Froeb, LM, and Werden, GJ, ‘Endogeneity in the Concentration-Price Relationship: Causes, Consequences, and Cures’ (1993) XLI(4) The Journal of Industrial Economics, 432–38.Google Scholar

Ewards, CD, ‘An Appraisal of the Antitrust Laws’ (1946) 36(2) The American Economic Review, 172–89.Google Scholar

Ewards, CD, ‘Can the Antitrust Laws Preserve Competition?’ (1940) 30(1) The American Economic Review, 164–79.Google Scholar

Farrell, J, ‘Complexity, Diversity, and Antitrust’ (2006) 51(1) The Antitrust Bulletin, 165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fèvre, R, A Political Economy of Power: Ordoliberalism in Context, 1932–1950 (New York: Oxford University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelstein, MO and Fairley, WB, ‘A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence’ (1970) 83(3) Harvard Law Review, 489–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

First, H and Weber Waller, S, ‘Antitrust’s Democracy Deficit’ (2013) 81(5) Fordham Law Review, 2543–74.Google Scholar

Fleischacker, S, ‘Adam Smith on Equality’ in Berry, CJ, Paganelli, MP, and Smith, C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), 485–500.Google Scholar

Flynn, JJ, ‘Antitrust Policy and the Concept of a Competitive Process’ (1990) 35(4) New York Law School Law Review, 893–916.Google Scholar

Forrester, I and Norall, C, ‘The Laicization of Community Law; Self-Help and the Rule of Reason: How Competition Law Is and Could Be Applied’ (1984) 21(1) Common Market Law Review, 11–51.Google Scholar

Foucault, M, Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1979 (Paris: Gallimard; Seuil 2004).Google Scholar

Fox, EM, ‘Antitrust and Democracy: How Markets Protect Democracy, Democracy Protects Markets, and Illiberal Politics Threatens to Hijack Both’ (2019) 46(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, EM, ‘The Battle for the Soul of Antitrust’ (1987) 75(3) California Law Review, 917–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, EM, ‘Consumer Beware Chicago’ (1986) 84(8) Michigan Law Review, 1714–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, EM, ‘Modernization of Antitrust: A New Equilibrium’ (1980) 66(6) Cornell Law Review, 1140–92.Google Scholar

Fox, EM, ‘The Politics of Law and Economics in Judicial Decision Making: Antitrust as a Window’ (1986) 61(4) New York University Law Review, 554–88.Google Scholar

Fox, EM, ‘The Symbiosis of Democracy and Markets: OECD – Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs Competition Committee – Global Competition Forum – Competition and Democracy’ (2017) www.oecd.org.Google Scholar

Fox, EM and Sullivan, LA, ‘Antitrust-Retrospective and Prospective: Where Are We Coming From? Where Are We Going?’ (1987) 62(5) New York University Law Review, 936–88.Google Scholar

Freyer, TA, Antitrust and Global Capitalism, 1930–2004 (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, M, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1962).Google Scholar

Friedman, M and Savage, LJ, ‘The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility’ (1952) 60(6) Journal of Political Economy, 463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furman, J and Orszag, P, ‘Slower Productivity and Higher Inequality: Are They Related?’ (2018). Working Paper 18-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaertner, W, Pattanaik, PK, and Suzumura, K, ‘Individual Rights Revisited’ (1992) 59(234) Economica, 161–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, DJ, ‘Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo-liberalism, Competition Law and the “New” Europe’ (1994) 42(1) American Journal of Comparative Law, 25–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, DJ, ‘Heinrich Kronstein and the Development of United States Antitrust Law’ in Lutter, et al (eds), Der Einfluss deutscher Emigranten auf die Rechtsentwicklung in den USA und in Deutschland (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1993), 155–69.Google Scholar

Gerber, DJ, Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus (Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press 1998).Google Scholar

Gerbrandy, A, ‘Rethinking Competition Law within the European Economic Constitution’ (2019) 57(1) JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 127–42.Google Scholar

Gilbert, RJ and Newbery, DMG, ‘Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly’ (1982) 72(3) The American Economic Review, 514–26.Google Scholar

Gillens, M and Page, BI, ‘Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens’ (2014) 12(3) Perspectives on Politics, 564–81.Google Scholar

Gillingham, J, ‘Zur Vorgeschichte Der Montan-Union: Westeuropas Kohle Und Stahl in Depression Und Krieg’ (1986) 34(3) Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 381–405.Google Scholar

Gill-Pedro, E, ‘Freedom to Conduct Business in EU Law: Freedom from Interference or Freedom from Domination?’ (2017) 9(2) European Journal of Legal Studies, 103–34.Google Scholar

Goebel, T, ‘The Political Economy of American Populism from Jackson to the New Deal’ (1997) 11(1) Studies in American Political Development, 109–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, RE and Jackson, F, ‘Freedom from Fear’ (2007) 35(3) Philosophy & Public Affairs, 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groeben, H von der ‘Competition Policy as Part of Economic Policy in the Common Market’ (1965) 10(5–6) Antitrust Bulletin, 911–32.Google Scholar

Groeben, H von der ‘Competition Policy in the Common Market and in the Atlantic Partnership’ (1965) 10(1) Antitrust Bulletin, 125–54.Google Scholar

Groeben, H von der, ‘Competition in the Common Market.’ Speech by Hans von der Groeben, Member of the Commission of the European Economic Community, during the debate on the draft regulation pursuant to Articles 85 and 86 of the EEC Treaty in the European Parliament. Strasbourg, 19 October 1961. Includes French version.Google Scholar

Groeben, H von der, ‘Competition Policy in the Common Market’ (1965).Google Scholar

Groeben, H von der, ‘Policy on Competition in the EEC: Supplement to Bulletin of the European Economic Community No 7–8’ (1961).Google Scholar

Grundmann, S, ‘The Concept of the Private Law Society: After 50 Years of European and European Business Law’ (2008) 16(4) European Review of Private Law, 553–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutiérrez, G and Philippon, T, ‘How EU Markets Became More Competitive Than US Markets: A Study of Institutional Drift’ (2018). NBER Working Paper No 24700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gyselen, L, ‘Rebates: Competition on the Merits or Exclusionary Practice?’ in Ehlermann, C-D and Atanasiu, I (eds), European Competition Law Annual 2003: What Is an Abuse of a Dominant Position? (Oxford: Hart 2003), 287–324.Google Scholar

Gyselen, L, ‘Vertical Restraints in the Distribution Process: Strength and Weakness of the Free-Rider Rationale under EEC Competition Law’ (1984) 21(4) Common Market Law Review, 647–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, A, Madison, J, and John, J, The Federalist Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Hanemann, W, ‘Information and the Concept of Option Value’ (1989) 16(1) Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, HC, ‘Robinson-Patman Law: A Review and Analysis’ (1983) 51(6) Fordham Law Review, 1113–218.Google Scholar

Hawk, BE, ‘System Failure: Vertical Restraints and EC Competition Law’ (1995) 32(4) Common Market Law Review, 973–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, FA von (ed), Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1948).Google Scholar

Hayek, FA von, ‘Competition as Discovery Procedure – Translated by Marcellus S. Snow’ (2002) 5(3) The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 9–23.Google Scholar

Hayek, FA von, The Constitution of Liberty [1960] (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, FA von, The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge 2001).Google Scholar

Hayek, FA von, ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’ (1945) 35(3) American Economic Review, 519–30.Google Scholar

Heffner, RD (ed), A Documentary History of the United States (New York: Penguin 2013).Google Scholar

Henry, C, ‘Option Values in the Economics of Irreplaceable Assets’ (1974) 41(5) The Review of Economic Studies, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, C, The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution [1972] (London: Penguin 2020).Google Scholar

Hirschman, AO, The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, T, Leviathan: Or the Matter, Form & Power of a Common-Wealth Eclasticall and Civill [1651] (London: Penguin Classics 1985).Google Scholar

Hofstadter, R, The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It (New York: Vintage Books 1948).Google Scholar

Hofstadter, R, ‘What Happened to the Antitrust Movement’ in Crane, DA and H Hovenkamp, (eds), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (New York: Oxford University Press 2013), 223–51.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, E and Salop, SC, ‘Asymmetric Stakes in Antitrust Litigation’. USC Legal Studies Research Papers Series No 20-12 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, H, ‘Antitrust Balancing’ (2016) 12(2) New York University Journal of Law and Business, 369–84.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, H, The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, H, ‘Antitrust Policy after Chicago’ (1985) 84(2) Michigan Law Review, 213–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, H, ‘The Areeda-Turner Test for Exclusionary Pricing: A Critical Journal’ (2015) 46(3) Review of Industrial Organization, 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, H, ‘The Neal Report and the Crisis in Antitrust’ (2009). Penn Law Faculty Scholarship 1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, H, ‘The Rule of Reason’ (2018) 70(1) Florida Law Review, 81–167.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, H and Shapiro, C, ‘Horizontal Mergers, Market Structure, and Burdens of Proof’ (2018) 127(7) The Yale Law Journal, 1996–2025.Google Scholar

Howse, R, ‘Montesquieu on Commerce, Conquest, War and Peace’ (2006) 31(3) Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 693–708.Google Scholar

Hurwitz, JD and Kovacic, WE, ‘Judicial Analysis of Predation: The Emerging Trends’ (1982) 35(1) Vanderbilt Law Review, 63–156.Google Scholar

Hüttenberger, P, ‘Wirtschaftsordnung und Interessenpolitik in der Kartellgesetzgebung der Bundesrepublik 1949–1957’ (1976) 24(3) Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 287–307.Google Scholar

Hylton, KN and Salinger, M, ‘Tying Law and Policy: A Decision-Theoretic Approach’ (2001) 69(2) Antitrust Law Journal, 469–526.Google Scholar

Jefferson, T, Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004).Google Scholar

Joliet, R, Monopolization and Abuse of Dominant Position: A Comparative Study of the American and European Approaches to the Control of Economic Power (La Haye/ Liège: Martinus Nijhoff 1970).Google Scholar

Jones, A and Kovacic, WE, ‘Identifying Anticompetitive Agreements in the United States and the European Union: Developing a Coherent Antitrust Analytical Framework’ (2017) 62(2) The Antitrust Bulletin, 254–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalintiri, A, ‘Analytical Shortcuts in EU Competition Enforcement: Proxies, Premises, and Presumptions’ (2020) 16(3) Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 392–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalintiri, A, Evidence Standards in EU Competition Enforcement: The EU Approach (Oxford: Hart 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kallaugher, J and Sher, B, ‘Rebates Revisited: Anti-Competitive Effects and Exclusionary Abuse under Article 82’ (2004) 25(5) European Competition Law Review, 263–85.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, A and Katznelson, I, Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplow, L, ‘Efficiencies in Merger Analysis’ (2021) 83(3) Antitrust Law Journal, 557–619.Google Scholar

Kaplow, L, ‘Likelihood Ratio Tests and Legal Decision Rules’ (2014) 16(1) American Law and Economics Review, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplow, L, ‘Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42(3) Duke Law Journal, 557–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, ML and Shapiro, C, ‘Systems Competition and Network Effects’ (1994) 8(2) Journal of Economic Perspectives, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, ML and Shelanski, HA, ‘Merger Analysis and the Treatment of Uncertainty: Should We Expect Better?’ (2007) 74(3) Antitrust Law Journal, 537–74.Google Scholar

Kauper, TE, ‘The Influence of Conservative Economic Analysis on the Development of the Law of Antitrust’ in Pitofsky, R (ed), How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaysen, C and Turner, DF, Antitrust Policy: An Economic and Legal Analysis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerber, W, ‘Competition, Innovation and Maintaining Diversity through Competition Law’ in Podszun, R, Kerber, W, and Drexl, J (eds), Competition Policy and the Economic Approach: Foundations and Limitations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2011), 173–201.Google Scholar

Keynes, JM, A Treatise on Probability (London: Macmillan 1921).Google Scholar

Khan, L, ‘Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox’ (2017) 126(3) Yale Law Journal, 710–805.Google Scholar

Khan, L, ‘The New Brandeis Movement: America’s Antimonopoly Debate’ (2018) 9(3) Journal for European Competition Law & Practice, 131–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klobuchar, A, Antitrust: Taking on Monopoly Power from the Gilded Age to the Digital Age (New York: Alfred A. Knopf 2021).Google Scholar

Knight, F, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1921).Google Scholar

Knortz, H, Wirtschaftsgeschichte der Weimarer Republik: Eine Einführung in Ökonomie und Gesellschaft der ersten Deutschen Republik (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koltay, G, Lorincz, S and Valletti, T, ‘Concentration and Competition: Evidence From Europe and Implications For Policy’ (2023) 19(3) Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, TC, ‘On Flexibility of Future Preference’ (1962). Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 150.Google Scholar

Korah, V, ‘From Legal Form toward Economic Efficiency – Article 85 (1) of the EEC Treaty in Contrast to U.S. Antitrust’ (1990) 35(4) Antitrust Bulletin, 1009–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korah, V, ‘The Rise and Fall of Provisional Validity: The Need for a Rule of Reason in EEC Antitrust’ (1981) 3(2) Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 320–57.Google Scholar

Kovacic, WE, ‘The Intellectual DNA of Modern U.S. Competition Law for Dominant Firm Conduct: The Chicago/Harvard Double Helix’ (2007) 1(1) Columbia Business Law Review, 1–80.Google Scholar

Kramer, MH, The Quality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krattenmaker, TG and Salop, SC, ‘Anticompetitive Exclusion: Raising Rivals’ Costs to Achieve Power over Price’ (1986) 96(3) The Yale Law Journal, 209–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreps, DM, ‘A Representation Theorem for “Preference for Flexibility”’ (1979) 47(3) Econometrica, 565–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

La Castillo de Torre, F and Gippini Fournier, E, Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in EU Competition Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lande, RH, ‘Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged’ (1982) 34(1) Hastings Law Journal, 65–152.Google Scholar

Larouche, P and Schinkel, MP, ‘Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act’ (TILEC Discussion Paper No 2013-02, Tilburg 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemley, MA and Shapiro, C, ‘Probabilistic Patents’ (2005) 19(2) Journal of Economic Perspectives, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Letina, I, ‘The Road Not Taken: Competition and the R&D Portfolio’ (2016) 47(2) The RAND Journal of Economics, 433–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Letwin, W, Law and Economic Policy in America: The Evolution of the Sherman Antitrust Act [1959] (Chicago: Chicago University Press 1981).Google Scholar

Leucht, B, ‘Expertise and the Creation of a Constitutional Order for Core Europe: Transatlantic Policy Networks in the Schuman Plan Negotiations’ in Kaiser, W, Leucht, B, and Gehler, M (eds), Transnational Networks in Regional Integration: Governing Europe 1945–83 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2010), 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leucht, B, ‘Transatlantic Policy Networks in the Creation of the First European Anti-trust Law: Mediating between American Anti-trust and German Ordo-liberalism’ in Kaiser, W, Leucht, B, and Rasmussen, M (eds), The History of the European Union: Origins of a Trans- and Supranational Polity 1950–72 (New York: Routledge 2009), 56–73.Google Scholar

Leucht, B and Marquis, M, ‘American Influences on EEC Competition Law: Two Paths, How Much Dependence?’ in Patel, KK and Schweitzer, H (eds), The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), 125–61.Google Scholar

Leucht, B and Seidel, K, ‘Du Traité de Paris au règlement 17/1962: Ruptures et continuités dans la politique européenne de concurrence, 1950–1962’ (2008) 27(1) Histoire, économie & société, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, EH, ‘The Antitrust Laws and Monopoly’ (1947) 14(2) University of Chicago Law Review, 153–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lianos, I and Katalevsky, D, ‘Merger Activity in the Factors of Production Segments of the Food Value Chain: A Critical Assessment of the Bayer/Monsanto merger’ (2017). Policy Paper Series 1/2017.Google Scholar

Lilburne, J, ‘England’s New Chains Discovered [1649]’ in Sharp, A (ed), The English Levellers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004), 140–57.Google Scholar

Lilburne, J, ‘Postscript to the Freeman’s Freedom Vindicated [1646]’ in Sharp, A (ed), The English Levellers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004), 31–32.Google Scholar

Lilburne, J and others, ‘The Petition of 11 September 1648 [1648]’ in Sharp, A (ed), The English Levellers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004), 131–39.Google Scholar

Lindeboom, J, ‘Formalism in Competition Law’ (2022) 18(4) Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 832–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsay, A and Berridge, A, The EU Merger Regulation: Substantive Issues (London: Sweet & Maxwell 2012).Google Scholar

List, C, ‘The Impossibility of a Paretian Republican? Some Comments on Pettit and Sen’ (2004) 20(1) Economics and Philosophy, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, C, ‘Republican Freedom and the Rule of Law’ (2006) 5(2) Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, C, ‘Social Choice Theory’ https://plato.stanford.edu.Google Scholar

List, C and Pettit, P, Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar

List, C and Valentini, L, ‘Freedom as Independence’ (2016) 126(4) Ethics, 1043–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Llorens Albors, A, ‘The Role of Objective Justification and Efficiencies in the Application of Article 82 EC’ (2007) 44(6) Common Market Law Review, 1727–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loecker, J de, Eeckhout, J, and Unger, G, ‘The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications’ (2020) 135(2) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 561–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynn, BC, Liberty from All Masters: The New American Autocracy vs. the Will of the People (New York: St. Martin’s Press 2020).Google Scholar

Ma, T-C, ‘Antitrust and Democracy: Perspectives from Efficiency and Equity’ (2016) 12(2) Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 233–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCallum, GC, ‘Negative and Positive Freedom’ (1967) 76(3) The Philosophical Review, 312–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machiavelli, N, Discourses on Livy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1998).Google Scholar

Maier-Rigaud, F, ‘On the Normative Foundations of Competition Law: Efficiency, Political Freedom and the Freedom to Compete’ in Zimmer, D (ed), The Goals of Competition Law (Cheltenham: Elgar 2012), 132–68.Google Scholar

Marshall, A, Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume (London: Macmillan 1920).Google Scholar

Martin, AW and Schum, DA, ‘Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A Likelihood Ratio Approach’ (1987) 27(4) Jurimetrics, 383–402.Google Scholar

Mason, ES, ‘The Current Status of the Monopoly Problem in the United States’ (1949) 62(8) Harvard Law Review, 1265–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, ES, Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1959).Google Scholar

Mason, ES, ‘Monopoly in Law and Economics’ (1937) 47(1) The Yale Law Journal, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, ES, ‘Schumpeter on Monopoly and the Large Firm’ (1951) 33(2) The Review of Economics and Statistics, 139–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, J, ‘Antitrust in the Formative Era: Political and Economic Theory in Constitutional and Antitrust Analysis, 1880–1918’ (1989) 50(2) Ohio State Law Journal, 257–396.Google Scholar

McCormick, JP, ‘Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism’ (2001) 95(2) American Political Science Review, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meadowcroft, J and William, R, ‘Hayek, Friedman, and Buchanan: On Public Life, Chile, and the Relationship between Liberty and Democracy’ (2014) 26(3) Review of Political Economy, 358–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meese, AJ, ‘Liberty and Antitrust in the Formative Era’ (1999) 79(1) Boston University Law Review, 1–92.Google Scholar

Melamed, AD and Petit, N, ‘The Misguided Assault on the Consumer Welfare Standard in the Age of Platform Markets’ (2019) 54(4) Review of Industrial Organization, 741–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merk, O and Teodoro, A, ‘Alternative Approaches to Measuring Concentration in Liner Shipping’ (2022) 24(4) Maritime Economics & Logistics, 723–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mestmäcker, E-J (ed), Wirtschaft und Verfassung in der Europäischen Union (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2003).Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, E-J, ‘Competition Policy and Antitrust: Some Comparative Observations’ (1980) 136(3) Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft/ Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 387–407.Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, E-J, ‘Die Beurteilung von Unternehmenszusammenschlüssen nach Artikel 86 des Vertrages über die Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft [1965]’ in Mestmäcker, E-J (ed), Wirtschaft und Verfassung in der Europäischen Union (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2003), 597–623.Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, E-J, ‘The Development of German and European Competition Law with Special Reference to the EU Commission’s Article 82 Guidance of 2008’ in Pace, LF (ed), European Competition Law: The Impact of the Commission’s Guidance on Article 102 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2011), 25–62.Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, E-J, ‘Wirtschaftsordnung und Staatsverfassung’ in Böhm, F, Mestmäcker, E-J, and Sauermann, H (eds), Wirtschaftsordnung und Staatsverfassung: Festschrift f. Franz Böhm z. 80. Geburtstag (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1975), 383–420.Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, E-J and Schweitzer, H, Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht (München: Beck 2014).Google Scholar

Miksch, L, ‘Die Wirtschaftspolitik des Als-Ob’ (1948) 105(2) Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 310–38.Google Scholar

Miksch, L, ‘Versuch eines liberalen Programms [1949]’ in Goldschmidt, N (ed), Grundtexte zur Freiburger Tradition der Ordnungsökonomik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2008), 163–70.Google Scholar

Miksch, L, Wettbewerb als Aufgabe: Grundsätze einer Wettbewerbsordnung (Godersberg: Verlag Helmut Küpper 1947).Google Scholar

Mill, JS, On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays [1859] (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, ST, ‘The Case of the Monopolies: Some of Its Results and Suggestions’ (1907) 6(1) Michigan Law Review, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat, De l’esprit des lois [1748] (Paris: Garnier-Flammarion 1979).Google Scholar

Monti, G, ‘Abuse of a Dominant Position: A Post-Intel Calm?’ [2019] CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 1.Google Scholar

Monti, G, ‘The Concept of Dominance in Article 82’ (2006) 2 (sup1) European Competition Journal, 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monti, G, EC Competition Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monti, G, ‘The Scope of Collective Dominance under Articles 82 EC’ (2001) 38(1) Common Market Law Review, 131–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

More, T, The Utopia: In Latin from the Edition of March 1518, and in English from the First Edition of Ralph Robynson’s Translation in 1551 with Additional Translations, Introduction and Notes by J.H. Lupton [1516] (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1895).Google Scholar

More, T, Utopia: Translated, Edited and Introduced by Dominic Baker-Smith [1516] (London: Penguin Classics 2012).Google Scholar

Möschel, W, ‘Competition Policy from an Ordo Point of View’ in Peacock, AT, Willgerodt, H, and Johnson, D (eds), German Neo-liberals and the Social Market Economy (London: Macmillan 1989), 142–59.Google Scholar

Müller, P, ‘Sovereignty Trade-Offs between Politics and the Economy: The Deconcentration of IG Farben after 1945’ (2022) 55(1) Central European History, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller-Armack, A, ‘The Social Market Economy as an Economic and Social Order’ (1978) 36(3) Review of Social Economy, 325–31.Google Scholar

Nachbar, TB, ‘Monopoly, Mercantilism, and the Politics of Regulation’ (2005) 91(5) Virginia Law Review, 1313–80.Google Scholar

Neal, PC and others, ‘Report of the White House Task Force on Antitrust Policy’ (1968–1969) 2(2) Antitrust Law & Economics Review, 11–52.Google Scholar

Nelson, RR, ‘Uncertainty, Learning, and the Economics of Parallel Research and Development Efforts’ (1961) 43(4) The Review of Economics and Statistics, 351–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, F, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933–1944 [1942] (New York: Octagon 1963).Google Scholar

Nic Shuibhne, N, ‘The Resilience of EU Market Citizenship’ (2010) 47(6) Common Market Law Review, Issue, 1597–628.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, R and Padilla, AJ, The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC (Oxford: Hart 2006).Google Scholar

Olson, M, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups [1965] (Harvard: Harvard University Press 1971).Google Scholar

Ophüls, CF, ‘Das Wirtschaftsrecht des Schumanplans’ (1951) 4(10) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 381–84.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, CS, ‘Federal Antitrust Legislation: Guideposts to a Revised National Antitrust Policy’ (1952) 50(8) Michigan Law Review, 1139–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orbach, BY, ‘The Antitrust Consumer Welfare Paradox’ (2011) 7(1) Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 133–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E, ‘Why Do We Need to Protect Institutional Diversity?’ (2012) 11(1) European Political Science, 128–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, V, ‘Polycentricity: The Structural Basis of Self-Governing Systems’ in Sabetti, F and Aligica, P Dragos (eds), Choice, Rules and Collective Action: The Ostroms on the Study of Institutions and Governance (Colchester: ECPR Press 2014), 45–60.Google Scholar

Overton, R, ‘An Arrow against all Tyrants [1646]’ in Sharp, A (ed), The English Levellers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004), 54–72.Google Scholar

Overton, R and Walwyn, W, ‘A Remonstrance of Many Thousand Citizens [1646]’ in Sharp, A (ed), The English Levellers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004), 33–53.Google Scholar

Padilla, AJ and Ahlborn, C, ‘From Fairness to Welfare: Implications for the Assessment of Unilateral Conduct under EC Competition Law’ in Ehlermann, C-D and Marquis, M (eds), European Competition Law Annual 2007: A Reformed Approach to Article 82 EC (Oxford: Hart 2008), 55–101.Google Scholar

Paine, T, Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000).Google Scholar

Park, JW, ‘The Utopian Economics of Sir Thomas More’ (1971) 30(3) The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 275–88.Google Scholar

Patel, KK and Schweitzer, H, ‘Introduction’ in Patel, KK and Schweitzer, H (eds), The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pattnaik, PK and Xu, Y, ‘On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Terms of Freedom of Choice’ (1990) 56(3/4) Recherches économiques de Louvain/Louvain Economic Review, 383–90.Google Scholar

Peltzman, S, ‘Toward a More General Theory of Regulation’ (1976) 19(2) The Journal of Law and Economics, 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peritz, RJ, Competition Policy in America: History, Rhetoric, Law (New York: Oxford University Press 2000).Google Scholar

Peritz, RJ, ‘A Counter-History of Antitrust Law’ (1990) 39(2) Duke Law Journal, 263–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersen, N, ‘Antitrust Law and the Promotion of Democracy and Economic Growth’ (2013) 9(3) Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 593–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petit, N, ‘Competition Cases Involving Platforms – Lessons from Europe: Comment on Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) Hearing #3 on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21^st Century’ (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P, ‘Capability and Freedom: A Defence of Sen’ (2001) 17(1) Economics and Philosophy, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P, ‘Freedom as Antipower’ (1996) 106(3) Ethics, 576–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P, ‘Freedom in the Market’ (2006) 5(2) Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P, ‘Freedom and Probability: A Comment on Goodin and Jackson’ (2008) 36(2) Philosophy & Public Affairs, 206–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P, ‘The Instability of Freedom as Noninterference: The Case of Isaiah Berlin’ (2011) 121(4) Ethics, 693–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P, On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997).Google Scholar

Pettit, P, ‘Republican Freedom: Three Axioms, Four Theorems’ in Laborde, C and Maynor, J (eds), Republicanism and Political Theory (Malden : Blackwell 2008), 102–30.Google Scholar

Philippon, T, The Great Reversal: How America Gave Up on Free Markets (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Pitkin, HF, ‘Are Freedom and Liberty Twins?’ (1988) 16(4) Political Theory, 523–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitofsky, R, ‘The Political Content of Antitrust’ (1979) 127(4) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1051–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, JGA and Whatmore, R, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition [1975] (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Polanyi, M, The Logic of Liberty (London: Routledge 1951).Google Scholar

Popofsky, MS, ‘Defining Exclusionary Conduct: Section 2, The Rule of Reason, and the Unifying Principle Underlying Antitrust Rules’ (2005) 73(2) Antitrust Law Journal, 435–82.Google Scholar

Portuese, A, ‘Precautionary Antitrust: A Precautionary Tale in European Competition Policy’ in Mathis, K and Tor, A (eds), Law and Economics of Regulation (Cham: Springer International Publishing 2021), 203–32.Google Scholar

Posner, RA, Antitrust Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2001).Google Scholar

Posner, RA, ‘The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis’ (1979) 127(4) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 925–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, RA, Economic Analysis of Law [1972] (Boston: Little, Brown & Comp 1977).Google Scholar

Posner, RA, ‘An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration’ (1973) 2(2) The Journal of Legal Studies, 399–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, RA, ‘Exclusionary Practices and the Antitrust Laws’ (1974) 41(3) The University of Chicago Law Review, 506–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, RA, ‘Information and Antitrust: Reflections on the Gypsum and Engineers Decisions’ (1979) 67(5) Georgetown Law Journal, 1187–204.Google Scholar

Posner, RA, ‘Norms and Values in the Economic Approach to Law’ in Hatzis, AN and Mercuro, N (eds), Law and Economics: Philosophical Issues and Fundamental Questions (London: Routledge 2015), 1–15.Google Scholar

Posner, RA, ‘Oligopoly and the Antitrust Laws: A Suggested Approach’ (1968–1969) 21 Stanford Law Review, 1562–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, RA, ‘Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory’ (1979) 8(1) The Journal of Legal Studies, 103–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, RA, ‘Wealth Maximization Revisited’ (1985) 2(1) Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 85–105.Google Scholar

Quinn, TK, Giant Business: Threat to Democracy: The Autobiography of an Insider (New York: NY Exposition Press 1953).Google Scholar

Rahman, KS, ‘Domination, Democracy, and Constitutional Political Economy in the New Gilded Age: Towards a Fourth Wave of Legal Realism?’ (2016) 94(7) Texas Law Review, 1329–60.Google Scholar

Raymond, FI, The Limitist (New York: W.W. Norton & Co 1947).Google Scholar

Reeves, T and Dodoo, N, ‘Standards of Proof and Standards of Judicial Review in European Commission Merger Law: Fordham Law School Centennial Issue’ (2006) 29(5) Fordham International Law Journal, 1034–67.Google Scholar

Ritter, C, ‘Presumptions in EU Competition Law’ (2018) 6(2) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, J, The Economics of Imperfect Competition (London: Macmillan 1933).Google Scholar

Röller, L-H and De la Mano, M, ‘The Impact of the New Substantive Test in European Merger Control’ (2006) 2(1) European Competition Journal, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roosevelt, T, ‘The Trusts, the People, and the Square Deal’ in Crane, DA and Hovenkamp, H (eds), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (New York: Oxford University Press 2013), 107–17.Google Scholar

Röpke, W, Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage [1958] (Düsseldorf: Verl.-Anst. Handwerk 2009).Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P, Le libéralisme économique: Histoire de l’idée de marché (Paris: Seuil 1989).Google Scholar

Rostow, EV, ‘Monopoly under the Sherman Act: Power or Purpose’ (1949) 43(6) Illinois Law Review, 745–93.Google Scholar

Rostow, EV, ‘The New Sherman Act: A Positive Instrument of Progress’ (1947) 14(4) The University of Chicago Law Review, 567–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothschild, E, ‘Adam Smith and Conservative Economics’ (1992) 45(1) The Economic History Review, 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, J-J, Du contrat social [1767] (Paris: Flammarion 2001).Google Scholar

Rubinfeld, DL, ‘On the Foundations of Antitrust Law and Economics’ in Pitofsky, R (ed), How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, DH, ‘Commonwealth Discourse and Economic Thought: The Morality of Exchange’ in Doran, S and Jones, N (eds), The Elizabethan World (London: Routledge 2014), 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, DH, ‘Parliament, Liberty, and the Commonweal’ in Hexter, JH (ed), Parliament and Liberty from the Reign of Elizabeth to the English Civil War (Stanford: Stanford University Press 1992), 85–121.Google Scholar

Salop, SC, ‘An Enquiry Meet for the Case: Decision Theory, Presumptions, and Evidentiary Burdens in Formulating Antitrust Legal Standards’ https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu (2017).Google Scholar

Salop, SC, ‘The Evolution and Vitality of Merger Presumptions: A Decision-Theoretic Approach’ (2015) 80(2) Antitrust Law Journal, 269–306.Google Scholar

Salop, SC, ‘The Raising Rivals’ Cost Foreclosure Paradigm, Conditional Pricing Practices and the Flawed Incremental Price-Cost Test’ (2017) 81(2) Antitrust Law Journal, 371–422.Google Scholar

Salop, SC and Scheffman, DT, ‘Cost-Raising Strategies’ (1987) 36(1) The Journal of Industrial Economics, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scherer, FM and Ross, D, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1990).Google Scholar

Schumpeter, JA, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy [1942] (New York: Harper & Row 1962).Google Scholar

Schwartz, E, ‘Politics as Usual: The History of European Community Merger Control’ (1993) 18(2) Yale Journal of International Law, 607–62.Google Scholar

Schwartz, LB, ‘Institutional Size and Individual Liberty: Authoritarian Aspects of Bigness’ (1960) 55(1) Northwestern University Law Review, 4–24.Google Scholar

Schwartz, LB, ‘“Justice” and Other Non-economic Goals of Antitrust’ (1979) 127(4) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1076–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweitzer, H, ‘Das Wettbewerbsrecht und das Problem privater Macht’ in Möslein, F (ed), Private Macht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2016), 447–73.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, H, ‘The History, Interpretation and Underlying Principles of Section 2 Sherman Act and Article 82 EC’ in Ehlermann, C-D and Marquis, M (eds), European Competition Law Annual 2007: A Reformed Approach to Article 82 EC (Oxford: Hart 2008), 119–64.Google Scholar

Scott, SP, ‘The Enactments of Justinian – The Code–Book IV’ in Scott, SP (ed), The Civil Law: Including The Twelve Tables, The Institutes of Gaius, The Rules of Ulpian, The Opinions of Paulus, The Enactments of Justinian, and The Constitutions of Leo: Translated from the Original Latin, Edited, and Compared with All Accessible Systems of Jurisprudence Ancient and Modern. By S. P. SCOTT, A. M. (Cincinatti: The Central Trust Company 1932).Google Scholar

Seaborne Davies, D, ‘Further Light on the Case of Monopolies’ (1932) 48(3) Law Quarterly Review, 394–414.Google Scholar

Seidel, K, ‘DG IV and the Origins of a Supranational Competition Policy: Establishing an Economic Constitution for Europe’ in Kaiser, W, Leucht, B, and Rasmussen, M (eds), The History of the European Union: Origins of a Trans- and Supranational Polity 1950–1972 (New York: Routledge 2009), 131–47.Google Scholar

Sen, A, Development as Freedom [1999] (New York: Anchor Books 2013).Google Scholar

Sen, A, ‘The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal’ (1970) 78(1) Journal of Political Economy, 152–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A, ‘Liberty and Social Choice’ (1983) 80(1) The Journal of Philosophy, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A, ‘Markets and Freedoms: Achievements and Limitations of the Market Mechanism in Promoting Individual Freedoms’ (1993) 45(4) Oxford Economic Papers, 519–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, C, ‘The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: From Hedgehog to Fox in Forty Years’ (2010) 77(1) Antitrust Law Journal, 49–107.Google Scholar

Shapiro, I, The State of Democratic Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004).Google Scholar

Simons, HC, Economic Policy for a Free Society (Chicago: Chicago University Press 1948).Google Scholar

Skinner, Q, Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998).Google Scholar

Skinner, Q, ‘Rethinking Political Liberty’ (2006) 61(1) History Workshop Journal, 156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Q, ‘A Third Concept of Liberty: Isaiah Berlin Lecture’ in The British Academy (ed), Proceedings of the British Academy: 2001 Lectures. Volume 117 (Oxford: Oxford University Press; British Academy 2002), 237–68.Google Scholar

Smith, A, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations [1776] (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1976).Google Scholar

Smith, A, The Theory of Moral Sentiments [1759] (New York: Penguin 2009).Google Scholar

Smith, F, ‘Why Not Abolish Antitrust?’ (1983) 7(1) Regulation, 23–28.Google Scholar

Spector, C, ‘Commerce’ in C Volpilhac-Auger (ed), Dictionnaire Montesquieu (2013) https://dictionnaire-montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr.Google Scholar

Spoerer, M and Steg, J, Neue Deutsche Wirtschaftsgeschichte (München 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinbaum, M and Stucke, ME, ‘The Effective Competition Standard: A New Standard for Antitrust’ (2020) 87(2) The University of Chicago Law Review, 595–623.Google Scholar

Steiner, H, ‘The Structure of a Set of Compossible Rights’ (1977) 74(12) The Journal of Philosophy, 767–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steuart, J, An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy: Being An Essay on the Science of Domestic Policy in Free Nations (London: A. Millar and T. Cadell 1768).Google Scholar

Stevens, WHS, ‘The Clayton Act’ (1915) 5(1) The American Economic Review, 38–54.Google Scholar

Stigler, GJ, ‘Barriers to Entry, Economies of Scale, and Firm Size’ in Stigler, GJ (ed), The Organization of Industry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1968), 67–70.Google Scholar

Stigler, GJ, ‘Imperfections in the Capital Market: Reprinted from Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXXV, No. 3, June 1967’ in Stigler, GJ (ed), The Organization of Industry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1968), 113–24.Google Scholar

Stigler, GJ, ‘Mergers and Preventive Antitrust Policy’ Reprinted from University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 104, No 2 (1955)’ in Stigler, GJ (ed), The Organization of Industry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1968), 296–305.Google Scholar

Stigler, GJ, ‘Monopoly and Oligopoly by Merger’ Reprinted from Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Review, Vol. XL, No. 2. (1950)’ in Stigler, GJ (ed), The Organization of Industry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1968), 95–107.Google Scholar

Stigler, GJ, ‘Smith’s Travels on the Ship of State’ (1971) 3(2) History of Political Economy, 265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, GJ, ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’ (1971) 2(1) The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, GJ, ‘A Theory of Oligopoly: Reprinted from Journal of Political Economy Vol. LXXII, No 1 (1964)’ in Stigler, GJ (ed), The Organization of Industry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1968), 39–65.Google Scholar

Stigler, GJ, ‘Wealth, and Possibly Liberty’ (1978) 7(2) The Journal of Legal Studies, 213–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoller, M, Goliath: The 100-Year War between Monopoly Power and Democracy (New York: Simon & Schuster 2019).Google Scholar

Stucke, ME, ‘Reconsidering Antitrust’s Goals’ (2012) 53(2) Boston College Law Review, 551–629.Google Scholar

Sullivan, LA, Antitrust (St. Paul: West Publishing 1977).Google Scholar

Sullivan, SP, ‘What Structural Presumption: Reuniting Evidence and Economics on the Role of Market Concentration in Horizontal Merger Analysis’ (2016) 42(2) Journal of Corporation Law, 403–44.Google Scholar

Suttle, O, ‘The Puzzle of Competitive Fairness’ (2022) 21(2) Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 190–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarbell, IM, The History of the Standard Oil Company (New York: McClure, Phillips & Co 1904).Google Scholar

Taylor, RS, ‘Market Freedom as Antipower’ (2013) 107(3) American Political Science Review, 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teachout, Z and Khan, L, ‘Market Structure and Political Law: A Taxonomy of Power’ (2014) 9(2) Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 37–74.Google Scholar

Telser, LG, ‘Why Should Manufacturers Want Fair Trade’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law and Economics, 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Temple Lang, J and O’Donoghue, R, ‘Defining Legitimate Competition: How to Clarify Pricing Abuses under Article 82’ (2002) 26(1) Fordham International Law Journal, 83–162.Google Scholar

Thorelli, HB, The Federal Antitrust Policy: Origination of an American Tradition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press 1955).Google Scholar

Tinbergen, J, On the Theory of Economic Policy (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company 1952).Google Scholar

Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome: Translated from the Original with Notes and Illustrations by George Baker, A.M. (New York: Peter A. Mesier et al. 1823).Google Scholar

Tom, WK, Balto, DA, and Averitt, NW, ‘Anticompetitive Aspects of Market-Share Discounts and Other Incentives to Exclusive Dealing’ (2000) 67(3) Antitrust Law Journal, 615–40.Google Scholar

Tooze, A, ‘The German National Economy in an Era of Crisis and War, 1917–1945’ in Smith, HW (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Modern German History (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2011), 400–22.Google Scholar

Townshend, H, Historical Collections; or, An Exact Account of the Last Four Parliaments of Q. Elizabeth of Famous Memory (London: Printed for T. Basset, W. Crooke, and W. Cademan 1680).Google Scholar

Tribe, LH, ‘Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process’ (1970) 84(6) Harvard Law Review, 1329–93.Google Scholar

Turner, DF, ‘Conglomerate Mergers and Section 7 of the Clayton Act’ (1965) 78(7) Harvard Law Review, 1313–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, DF, ‘The Definition of Agreement under the Sherman Act: Conscious Parallelism and Refusals to Deal’ (1962) 75(4) Harvard Law Review, 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, DF, ‘The Scope of Antitrust and Other Economic Regulatory Policies’ (1969) 82(6) Harvard Law Review, 1207–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, DF, ‘The Validity of Tying Arrangements under the Antitrust Laws’ (1958) 72(1) Harvard Law Review, 50–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vande Walle, S, ‘Competition and Competition Law in Japan: Between Scepticism and Embrace’ in Dowdle, MW, Gillespie, J, and Imelda, Maher (eds), Asian Capitalism and the Regulation of Competition: Towards a Regulatory Geography of Global Competition Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013), 123–43.Google Scholar

Verouden, V, Bengtsson, C, and Albaek, S, ‘The Draft EU Notice on Horizontal Mergers: A Further Step toward Convergence’ (2004) 49(1–2) Antitrust Bulletin, 243–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vesterdorf, B, ‘Standard of Proof in Merger Cases: Reflections in the Light of Recent Case Law of the Community Courts’ (2005) 1(1) European Competition Journal, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viner, J, ‘Adam Smith and Laissez Faire’ (1927) 35(2) Journal of Political Economy, 198–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagner, DO, ‘Coke and the Rise of Economic Liberalism’ (1935) 6(1) The Economic History Review, 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walras, L, Elements of Pure Economics: Or, the Theory of Social Wealth (Fairfield: A.M. Kelley 1977, 1954).Google Scholar

Walwyn, W, ‘Gold Tried in the Fire [1647]’ in Sharp, A (ed), The English Levellers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004), 73–91.Google Scholar

Watson, A (ed), The Digest of Justinian: Volume I (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 1985).Google Scholar

Weber Waller, S, ‘The Antitrust Legacy of Thurman Arnold’ (2004) 78(3) St. John’s Law Review, 569–614.Google Scholar

Weber Waller, S, ‘Antitrust and Democracy’ (2019) 46(4) Florida State University Law Review, 806–60.Google Scholar

Weisbrod, BA, ‘Collective-Consumption Services of Individual-Consumption Goods’ (1964) 78(3) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 471–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wells, WC, Antitrust and the Formation of the Postwar World (New York: Columbia University Press 2002).Google Scholar

Whinston, M, ‘Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion’ (1990) 80(4) American Economic Review, 837–59.Google Scholar

Whish, R, ‘Regulation 2790/99: The Commission’s “new style” Block Exemption for Vertical Agreements’ (2000) 37(4) Common Market Law Review, 887–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whish, R and Sufrin, B, ‘Article 85 and the Rule of Reason’ (1987) 7(1) Yearbook of European Law, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wigger, A, ‘Debunking the Myth of the Ordoliberal Influence on Post-war European Integration’ in Joerges, C and Hien, J (eds), Ordoliberalism: Law and the Rule of Economics (Oxford: Hart 2018), 161–78.Google Scholar

Williamson, OE, ‘Economies as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs’ (1968) 58(1) The American Economic Review, 18–36.Google Scholar

Wilson, W, The New Freedom (Leipzig: Tauchnitz 1913).Google Scholar

Wilson, W, ‘The Tariff and the Trusts’ in Crane, DA and Hovenkamp, H (eds), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (New York: Oxford University Press 2013), 119–24.Google Scholar

Witt, A, The More Economic Approach to EU Antitrust Law (Oxford: Hart 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witt, AC, ‘From Airtours to Ryanair: Is the More Economic Approach to EU Merger Law Really about More Economics?’ (2012) 49(1) Common Market Law Review, 217–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wootton, D, ‘Leveller Democracy and the Puritan Revolution’ in Burns, JH and Goldie, M (eds), The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008), 412–42.Google Scholar

Wu, T, ‘After Consumer Welfare, Now What? The “Protection of Competition” Standard in Practice’ [2018]) Competition Policy International, 1–12.Google Scholar

Wu, T, The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age (New York: Columbia Global Reports 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, T, ‘The “Protection of the Competitive Process” Standard’ (2018). Columbia Public Law Research Paper No 14-612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zingales, L, ‘Towards a Political Theory of the Firm’ (2017) 31(3) Journal of Economic Perspectives, 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar