Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:50:30.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - DOUBLY ENGAGED SOCIAL SCIENCE

THE PROMISE OF COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Theda Skocpol
Affiliation:
Harvard University
James Mahoney
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Dietrich Rueschemeyer
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

Social science achieves its potential and proves its worth as a human enterprise when it offers “substantive enlightenment … about the social structures in which we are enmeshed and which largely condition the course of our lives,” declared Lewis Coser (1975, p. 698) in his 1975 presidential address to the American Sociological Association. As Coser articulated this demanding standard, U.S. social science was not only caught up in the social upheavals triggered by “the sixties.” It was also in the early stages of what was to become a remarkable renascence of comparative and historical scholarship engaging big questions about social change and politics.

To be sure, Coser's vision was in tension with reigning academic paradigms of the 1960s and 1970s. Economists were committed to abstract equilibrium models almost entirely detached from empirical trends, while most sociologists and political scientists practiced what C. Wright Mills (1959) decried as “abstracted empiricism” tempered with flights of artificially generalized “grand theory.” Enamored of advances in survey research and statistical analysis, most postwar U.S. sociologists and political scientists produced atemporal studies of contemporary social problems, voting behavior, or processes of individual status attainment, while a minority of macroscopically focused scholars attempted to fit all the nations of the world along a single evolutionary path toward the “modern social (or political) system” – a construct that looked suspiciously like an idealized version of the United States circa 1960.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkey, Karen and Rossem, Ronan. 1997. “Networks of Contention: Villages and Regional Structure in the Seventeenth-Century Ottoman Empire.” American Journal of Sociology 102: 1345–82Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Bearman, Peter S. 1993. Relations into Rhetorics: Local Elite Social Structure in Norfolk, England, 1540–1640. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press
Bennett, Andrew and Alexander George. 1997. “Process Tracing in Case Study Methods.” Paper presented at the MacArthur Workshop, Harvard University, October
Campbell, Andrea Louise. In press. Shaping Policy, Shaping Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Charrad, Mounira. 2001. States and Women's Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press
Clemens, Elisabeth S. 1997. The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Coser, Lewis. 1975. “Presidential Address: Two Methods in Search of a Substance.” American Sociological Review 40: 691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get.” Political Analysis 2: 131–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 1991. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press
Goodwin, Jeff. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Gould, Roger V. 1995. Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Green, Donald P. and Ian Shapiro. 1996. Pathologies of Rational Choice: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Hacker, Jacob. 2002. Boundary Wars: The Political Struggle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Htun, Mala. In press. Democracy, Dictatorship, and Gendered Rights. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Huber, Evelyn and John D. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crises of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Katznelson, Ira. 1981. City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States. New York: Pantheon Books
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Lieberson, Stanley. 1991. “Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases.” Social Forces 70: 307–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Luong, Pauline Jones. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge and New York:Cambridge University Press
Lustick, Ian. 1993. Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and West Bank–Gaza. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Marx, Anthony. 1998. Making Race and Nation: A Comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press
Mohr, John W. 1994. “Soldiers, Mothers, Tramps, and Others: Discourse Roles in the 1907 New York Charity Directory.” Poetics 22: 325–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Barrington, Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press
O'Connor, Julia S., Ann Shola Orloff, and Sheila Shaver. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Orren, Karen and Stephen Skowronek. 1994. “Beyond the Iconography of Order: Notes for a New Institutionalism.” Pp. 311–30 in The Dynamics of American Politics, edited by Lawrence Dodd and Calvin Jillson. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Padgett, John F. and Ansell, Christopher K.. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1259–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000a. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94: 251–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul 2000b. “Not Just What, But When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes.” Studies in American Political Development 14: 72–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul 2000c. “The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change.” Governance 13: 475–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press
Rule, James B. 1997. Theory and Progress in Social Science. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Scott, John. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd ed. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Sewell, William H. 1996. “Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” Pp. 245–80 in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by Terrence J. McDonald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Shapiro, Ian. 2001. “Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or: What's Wrong with Political Science and What to Do About It.” Typescript of the Charles E. Lindblom Lecture in Public Policy, delivered on February 14 at the Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Skocpol, Theda 1982. “Rentier State and Shi'a Islam in the Iranian Revolution.” Theory and Society 11: 265–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad. 2000. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94: 527–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 1998. “Paths Out of Sultanistic Regimes: Combining Structural and Voluntarist Perspectives.” Pp. 49–81 in Sultanistic Regimes, edited by H. E. Chehabiand J. J. Linz. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
Swank, Duane. 2000. “Political Institutions and Welfare State Restructuring: The Impact of Institutions on Social Policy Change in Developed Democracies.” Pp. 197–237 in The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen 2000. “Time and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Evolution and Change.” Studies in American Political Development 14: 102–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles, ed. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Tilly, Charles 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2001. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press
Wickham-Crowley, Timothy. 1992. Guerrillas and Revolutions in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Insurgents and Regimes since 1956. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×