Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:56:49.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Finland

Corporate governance: Nordic tradition with American spices

from B - Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Andreas M. Fleckner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Klaus J. Hopt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Get access

Summary

General information on corporate governance

Introduction

Finland belongs to the Nordic legal family, which is positioned somewhere in between the continental and Anglo-American legal families, with features typical to both civil law and common law. Owing to the common history of company legislation, corporate governance traditions, and some specific preconditions regarding the ownership structure on the stock market, Nordic corporate governance differs in some respects from both the continental and Anglo-American models. However, the European harmonization in company and securities law has radically decreased the differences between corporate governance regulation in the various European countries. As Denmark, Finland, and Sweden are members of the European Union, and Iceland and Norway are part of the European Economic Area (“EEA”) through the Agreement on the European Economic Area, their regulations resemble each other also in this respect.

However, there are still two special aspects that must be remembered: first, as all Nordic countries have up-to-date company statutes that have recently undergone major reforms, they include several aspects of modern corporate governance discussion that, in other countries, are regulated through codes on a “comply-or-explain” basis. For this reason, although the Nordic countries have modern corporate governance codes, too, their structure differs from the codes in other countries. Second, the Nordic capital markets have become increasingly integrated. A number of cross-border mergers have taken place, creating large pan-Nordic companies, in several cases with listings on more than one of the Nordic stock exchanges.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparative Corporate Governance
A Functional and International Analysis
, pp. 393 - 443
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H., An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd edn. (Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 285Google Scholar
Hansen, J., “A Scandinavian Approach to Corporate Governance,”Scandinavian Studies in Law 50 (2007), 125–142Google Scholar
Bradley, M., Schipani, C., Sundaram, A., and Walsh, J., “The Purposes and Accountability of the Corporation in Contemporary Society: Corporate Governance at a Crossroads,”Law and Contemporary Problems 62/3 (1999), 10–11Google Scholar
Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R., “A Survey of Corporate Governance,”The Journal of Finance 52/2 (1997), 737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mähönen, J., “Governance in Foundations: What Can We Learn from Business Firm Corporate Governance?”Nordic and European Company Law 2/1 (2011)Google Scholar
Mähönen, J. and Villa, S., Osakeyhtiö I: Yleiset opit (Limited Liability Company I: General Principles) (Helsinki: WSOYpro, 2006), p. 3Google Scholar
Savela, A., “Osakeyhtiölain yhdenvertaisuusperiaate” (“Principle of Equality in the Companies Act”), Defensor Legis 92/1 (2010), 3–24Google Scholar
Mähönen, J., “Capital Maintenance and Distribution Rules in Modern European Company Law,” in Andersen, P. and Sørensen, K. (eds.), Company Law and Finance (Copenhagen: Forlaget Thomson A/S, 2008), pp. 119–149Google Scholar
Mähönen, J. and Villa, S., Osakeyhtiö III: Corporate Governance (Limited Liability Company III: Corporate Governance), 2nd edn. (Helsinki: WSOYpro, 2010), pp. 1–2Google Scholar
Ferrarini, G. and Wymeersch, E. [eds.], Investor Protection in Europe: Corporate Law Making, the MiFID and Beyond [Oxford University Press, 2006], pp. 119–142)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E., “Economic Analysis of Contract Law After Three Decades: Success or Failure,”Yale Law Journal 112 (2003), 829–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I. and Gertner, R., “Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules,”Yale Law Journal 99 (1989), 87–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löbbe, M., “Corporate Groups: Competences of the Shareholders' Meeting and Minority Protection – the German Federal Court of Justice's recent Gelatine and Macrotron Cases Redefine the Holzmüller Doctrine,”German Law Journal 5/9 (2004), 1057–1079Google Scholar
Mähönen, J. and Villa, S., “Tärkeät päätökset ja toimivalta osakeyhtiössä” (Important Decisions and Competence in a Limited Liability Company), Lakimies 109 (2011)Google Scholar
Airaksinen, M., “Finland,” in Maul, S., Muffat-Jeandet, D., and Simon, J. (eds.), Takeover Bids in Europe (Freiburg i. Br.: Memento, 2008)Google Scholar
Mähönen, J. and Villa, S., Osuuskunta (The Cooperative) (Helsinki: WSOYpro, 2006)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Finland
  • Edited by Andreas M. Fleckner, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany, Klaus J. Hopt, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
  • Book: Comparative Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177375.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Finland
  • Edited by Andreas M. Fleckner, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany, Klaus J. Hopt, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
  • Book: Comparative Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177375.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Finland
  • Edited by Andreas M. Fleckner, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany, Klaus J. Hopt, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
  • Book: Comparative Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177375.014
Available formats
×