Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:02:19.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Constitutionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

W. J. Waluchow
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Get access

Summary

Constitutional Democracy

In order to understand Charters and the role they can or ought to play in countries like Canada, the United States, Germany, and Mexico, one must first appreciate two very basic facts. First, each of the societies in those countries claims to embrace some form of democracy. In Chapter 3 we will see that debates about the legitimacy of judicial review often turn on how more precisely we are to understand the concept of democracy, but for now, we can work with the following understanding: Democracy means that the people themselves are in some way ultimately responsible for determining the laws and regulations by which they are governed, not a king or queen as in a monarchy, or a group of elites as in an oligarchy. Of course, even citizens in ideal democracies do not themselves necessarily make all decisions creating, modifying, or extinguishing laws or other forms of government directive. Not all such “law-determining decisions” are made directly by citizens. Government by the people comes in a variety of very different shapes, and only some of these are direct, as in ancient Athens where all citizens were entitled to vote on matters coming before the Assembly. Most democracies are indirect, which characteristically means that citizens elect representatives who then, normally through processes involving majority voting in a representative assembly, make law-determining decisions on the people's behalf.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review
The Living Tree
, pp. 15 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Constitutionalism
  • W. J. Waluchow, McMaster University, Ontario
  • Book: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review
  • Online publication: 09 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498893.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Constitutionalism
  • W. J. Waluchow, McMaster University, Ontario
  • Book: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review
  • Online publication: 09 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498893.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Constitutionalism
  • W. J. Waluchow, McMaster University, Ontario
  • Book: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review
  • Online publication: 09 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498893.002
Available formats
×