Aeschliman, Alain, ‘Protection of detainees: ICRC action behind bars’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 857, March 2005, pp. 83–122.Google Scholar

Aeschlimann, Alain and Roggo, Nicolas, ‘Systématique des visites aux personnes privées de liberté: l’expérience du CICR’, in Bertrand, Dominique and Niveau, Gérard (eds), Médecine, santé et prison, Editions Médecine et Hygiène, Geneva, 2006, pp. 91–99.Google Scholar

Bugnion, François, The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims, ICRC/Macmillan, Oxford, 2003.Google Scholar

Chesney, Robert M., ‘Prisoners of War’, version of October 2009, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, http://www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar

de Sinner, Philippe and Reyes, Hernan, ‘Activités du CICR en matière de visites aux personnes privées de liberté: une contribution à la lutte contre la torture’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The international fight against torture – La lutte internationale contre le terrorisme, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 1991, pp. 153–171.Google Scholar

Gasser, Hans-Peter, ‘Scrutiny’, Australian Year Book of International Law, Vol. 9, 1980, pp. 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ICRC, ‘Protecting people deprived of their liberty’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 98, No. 903, December 2016, pp. 1043–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maia, Catherine, Kolb, Robert and Scalia, Damian, La Protection des Prisonniers de Guerre en Droit International Humanitaire, Bruylant, Brussels, 2015, pp. 204–254.Google Scholar

Pfanner, Toni, ‘Various mechanisms and approaches for implementing international humanitarian law and protecting and assisting war victims’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 874, June 2009, pp. 279–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasmussen, Gustav, Code des prisonniers de guerre: Commentaire de la Convention du 27 juillet 1929 relative au traitement des prisonniers de guerre, Levin & Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1931, pp. 56–62.Google Scholar

Rosas, Allan, The Legal Status of Prisoners of War: A Study in International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Institute for Human Rights, Åbo Akademi University, Turku/Åbo, 1976, reprinted 2005, pp. 458–469.Google Scholar

Sassòli, Marco, International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2019, pp. 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, Vincent (ed.), ‘Generating respect for the law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Special issue, Vol. 96, No. 895/896, Autumn/Winter 2015.Google Scholar

Bernard, Vincent and Nikolova, Mariya, ‘Generating respect for the law: The need for persistence and imagination’, in Grignon, Julia (ed.), Tribute to Jean Pictet, Editions Yvon Blais, Montreal, 2016, pp. 564–578.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, ‘The role of national law in the implementation of international humanitarian law’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 301–312.Google Scholar

Harroff-Tavel, Marion, ‘The International Committee of the Red Cross and the promotion of international humanitarian law: Looking back, looking forward’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 96, Nos 895/896, 2014, pp. 817–857.Google Scholar

ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, ‘National Committees for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law’, 2003.Google Scholar

ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, ‘The Obligation to Disseminate International Humanitarian Law’, 2003.Google Scholar

ICRC, The Roots of Behaviour in War: Understanding and Preventing IHL Violations, ICRC, Geneva, 2004.Google Scholar

ICRC, Integrating the Law, ICRC, Geneva, 2007.Google Scholar

ICRC, The Roots of Restraint in War, ICRC, Geneva, June 2018.Google Scholar

ICRC, National Committees and Similar Entities on International Humanitarian Law: Guidelines for Success, ICRC, Geneva, 2019.Google Scholar

Junod, Sylvie-Stoyanka, ‘La diffusion du droit international humanitaire’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 359–368.Google Scholar

Kadam, Umesh, ‘Teaching international humanitarian law in academic institutions in South Asia: An overview of an ICRC dissemination programme’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 83, No. 841, March 2001, pp. 167–169.Google Scholar

Kuster, Etienne, ‘Promoting the Teaching of IHL in Universities: Overview, Successes and Challenges of the ICRC’s Approach’, in Djukić, Dražan and Pons, Niccolò (eds), The Companion to International Humanitarian Law, Brill, Leiden, 2018, pp. 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Michael A., ‘The role of a National Society in the implementation of international humanitarian law – taking up the challenge!’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 37, No. 317, April 1997, pp. 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikos-Skuza, Elżbieta, ‘Dissemination of the Conventions, Including in Time of Armed Conflict’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 597–614.Google Scholar

Quéguiner, Jean-François, ‘Commentary on the Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III)’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 865, March 2007, pp. 175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spoerri, Philip, ‘From Dissemination towards Integration: An ICRC Perspective’, Military Law and the Law of War Review, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2013, pp. 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Surbeck, Jean-Jacques, ‘La diffusion du droit international humanitaire, condition de son application’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 537–549.Google Scholar

Verri, Pietro, ‘Institutions militaires: le problème de l’enseignement du droit des conflits armés et de l’adaptation des règlements à ses prescriptions humanitaires’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 603–619.Google Scholar

ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, Domestic law and IHL, https://www.icrc.org/en/war-and-law/ihl-domestic-law.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, George, ‘The Concept of War Crimes’, in Yee, Sienho and Wang, Tieya (eds), International Law in the Post-Cold War World: Essays in Memory of Li Haopei, Routledge, London, 2001, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ‘Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice’, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 42, No. 1, Fall 2001, pp. 81–162.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif and Wise, Edward M., Aut Dedere, Aut Judicare: The Duty to Extradite or Prosecute in International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedi, Satya Deva, Extradition: A Treatise on the Laws Relevant to the Fugitive Offenders Within and With the Commonwealth Countries, William S. Hein & Company, Getzville, New York, 2001.Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey, War and Law Since 1945, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar

Blazeby, Leonard, ‘Implementation of International Humanitarian Law within the Commonwealth’, Commonwealth Law Bulletin, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2008, pp. 797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boelaert-Suominen, Sonja, ‘Grave Breaches, Universal Jurisdiction and Internal Armed Conflicts: Is Customary Law Moving Towards a Uniform Enforcement Mechanism for all Armed Conflicts?’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 5, No. 1, June 2000, pp. 63–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bothe, Michael, ‘The role of national law in the implementation of international humanitarian law’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 301–312.Google Scholar

Brems, Eva, ‘Universal Criminal Jurisdiction for Grave Breaches of International Humanitarian Law: The Belgian Legislation’, Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2002, pp. 909–952.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 181–192 and 199–205.Google Scholar

Cohen, Amichai and Shany, Yuval, ‘Beyond the Grave Breaches Regime: The Duty to Investigate Alleged Violations of International Law Governing Armed Conflicts’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2011, Vol. 14, 2012, pp. 37–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cryer, Robert, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 9–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danner, Allison M. and Martinez, Jenny S., ‘Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal Law’, California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, 2005, pp. 75–169.Google Scholar

Darcy, Shane and Powderly, Joseph (eds), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals, Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de La Pradelle, Paul, La Conférence diplomatique et les nouvelles Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949, Les Éditions internationales, Paris, 1951.Google Scholar

Dörmann, Knut and Geiss, Robin, ‘The Implementation of Grave Breaches into Domestic Legal Orders’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 703–721.Google Scholar

Draper, Gerald I.A.D., ‘The Modern Pattern of War Criminality’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 6, 1976, pp. 9–48.Google Scholar

Ferdinandusse, Ward, ‘The Prosecution of Grave Breaches in National Courts’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 723–741.Google Scholar

Fleck, Dieter, ‘Shortcomings of the Grave Breaches Regime’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 833–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaeta, Paola, ‘Grave Breaches of the Geneva Conventions’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 615–646.Google Scholar

Godinho, Jorge A.F., ‘The Surrender Agreements between the US and the ICTY and ICTR: A Critical View’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 1, No. 2, August 2003, pp. 502–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graven, Jean, ‘La répression pénale des infractions aux Conventions de Genève’, Revue internationale de criminologie et de police technique, Vol. 10, 1956, pp. 241–263.Google Scholar

Green, Leslie C., ‘The Law of Armed Conflict and the Enforcement of International Criminal Law’, Canadian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 22, 1984, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar

Green, Leslie C., The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict, Manchester University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Green, Leslie C., ‘Enforcement of the Law in International and Non-International Conflicts – The Way Ahead’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 24, 1996, pp. 285–320.Google Scholar

Greppi, Edoardo, ‘The evolution of individual criminal responsibility under international law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 81, No. 835, September 1999, pp. 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, Kevin Jon, The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 203–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henzelin, Marc, Le principe de l’universalité en droit pénal international: Droit et obligation pour les états de poursuivre et juger selon le principe de l’universalité, Bruylant, Geneva, 2000.Google Scholar

ICRC, Database on National Implementation of International Humanitarian Law, https://www.icrc.org/ihl-nat.Google Scholar

ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, National measures to repress violations of international humanitarian law (Civil law systems), Report on the Meeting of Experts, Geneva, 23–25 September 1997, ICRC, Geneva, September 2000.Google Scholar

ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, The Domestic Implementation of International Humanitarian law: A Manual, ICRC, Geneva, 1st edition 2011, updated edition 2015.Google Scholar

ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, Preventing and repressing international crimes: Towards an ‘integrated’ approach based on domestic practice, Report of the Third Universal Meeting of National Committees for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law, prepared by Anne-Marie La Rosa, Vols I–II, ICRC, Geneva, February 2014.Google Scholar

Keen, Maurice H., The Laws of War in the Late Middle Ages, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1965.Google Scholar

Kreß, Claus, ‘Reflections on the Judicare Limb of the Grave Breaches Regime’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 789–809.Google Scholar

Lafontaine, Fannie, ‘Universal Jurisdiction – the Realistic Utopia’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 10, No. 5, December 2012, pp. 1277–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eve, La Haye, War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts, Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

La Rosa, Anne-Marie, ‘Sanctions as a means of obtaining greater respect for humanitarian law: a review of their effectiveness’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, No. 870, June 2008, pp. 221–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

La Rosa, Anne-Marie and Chavez Tafur, Gabriel, ‘Where do we stand on universal jurisdiction? Proposed points for further reflection and debate’, Politorbis – Revue de politique étrangère, No. 54, No. 2, 2012, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Law of Nations and the Punishment of War Crimes’, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 21, 1944, pp. 58–95.Google Scholar

Levie, Howard S., ‘War Crimes’, in Schmitt, Michael N. (ed.), The Law of Military Operations: Liber Amicorum Professor Jack Grunawalt, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 72, 1998, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar

Lewis, Mark, The Birth of the New Justice: The Internationalization of Crime and Punishment, 1919–1950, Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maison, Raffaëlle, ‘Les premiers cas d’application des dispositions pénales des Conventions de Genève par les juridictions internes’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1995, pp. 260–273.Google Scholar

Maogoto, Jackson N., War crimes and Realpolitik: International Justice from World War I to the 21st Century, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colorado, March 2004, pp. 37–64.Google Scholar

McCormack, Timothy L.H., ‘From Sun Tzu to the Sixth Committee: the Evolution of an International Criminal Law Regime’, in McCormack, Timothy L.H. and Simpson, Gerry J. (eds), The Law of War Crimes: International and National Approaches, Kluwer Law International, 1997, pp. 31–64. (1997a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCormack, Timothy L.H., ‘Selective Reaction to Atrocity: War Crimes and the Development of International Criminal Law’, Albany Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 3, Spring 1997, pp. 681–731. (1997b)Google Scholar

Medlong, Jesse, ‘All Other Breaches: State Practice and the Geneva Conventions’ Nebulous Class of Less Discussed Prohibitions’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2013, pp. 829–856.Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor, ‘Crimes and Accountability in Shakespeare’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 92, No. 1, January 1998, pp. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meron, Theodor, ‘Reflections on the Prosecutions of War Crimes by International Tribunals’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 100, No. 3, July 2006, pp. 551–579.Google Scholar

Mettraux, Guénaël, ‘US Courts-Martial and the Armed Conflict in the Philippines (1899–1902): Their Contribution to National Case Law on War Crimes’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2003, pp. 135–150.Google Scholar

Mettraux, Guénaël, International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Mettraux, Guénaël, The Law of Command Responsibility, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Moir, Lindsay, ‘Grave Breaches and Internal Armed Conflicts’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 763–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nebout, Guy, Le problème des sanctions à appliquer en cas d’infractions graves aux Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949, Pierre Moulin, Lyon, 1954.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Roger, ‘The Grave Breaches Regime and Universal Jurisdiction’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 811–831.Google Scholar

Rabinovitch, Ryan, ‘Universal Jurisdiction in Absentia’, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2004, pp. 500–530.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ken, ‘The Contribution of the ICTY to the Grave Breaches Regime’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 743–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandoz, Yves, ‘Penal Aspects of International Humanitarian Law’, in Bassiouni, M. Cherif (ed.), International Criminal Law, Vol. 1, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley, New York, 1986, pp. 209–232.Google Scholar

Sandoz, Yves, ‘The History of the Grave Breaches Regime’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 657–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sassòli, Marco, ‘L’arrêt Yerodia: quelques remarques sur une affaire au point de collision entre les deux couches du droit international’, Revue générale de droit international public, Vol. 106, No. 4, 2002, pp. 791–817.Google Scholar

Segall, Anna, Punishing Violations of International Humanitarian Law at the National Level: A Guide for Common Law States – Drawing on the proceedings of a meeting of experts (Geneva, 11–13 November 1998), ICRC, Geneva, 2001.Google Scholar

Sluiter, Göran (ed.), ‘Symposium’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2007, pp. 67–226.Google Scholar

UN Office on Drugs and Crime, Manual on Mutual Legal Assistance and Extradition, United Nations, New York, 2012.Google Scholar

UN Secretary-General, Report on the scope and application of the principle of universal jurisdiction, UN Doc. A/66/93, 20 June 2011.Google Scholar

UN War Crimes Commission, The History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the Development of the Laws of War, His Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1948.Google Scholar

van Elst, Richard, ‘Implementing Universal Jurisdiction over Grave Breaches of the Geneva Conventions’, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2000, pp. 815–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Steenberghe, Raphaël, ‘The Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute: Clarifying its Nature’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1089–1116.Google Scholar

Wagner, Natalie, ‘The development of the grave breaches regime and of individual criminal responsibility by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 85, No. 850, June 2003, pp. 351–383.Google Scholar

Wells, Donald A., War Crimes and Laws of War, 2nd edition, University Press of America, 1991.Google Scholar

Badar, Mohamed Elewa, ‘Drawing the Boundaries of Mens Rea in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, International Criminal Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2006, pp. 313–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badar, Mohamed Elewa, The Concept of Mens Rea in International Criminal Law: The Case for a Unified Approach, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Dautricourt, Joseph, ‘La protection pénale des conventions internationales humanitaires – La définition des infractions graves’, Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1955, pp. 1–55.Google Scholar

Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Dörmann, Knut, ‘Article 8. War Crimes’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 295–365.Google Scholar

Dörmann, Knut, La Haye, Eve and von Hebel, Herman, ‘The Context of War Crimes’, in Lee, Roy S. and Friman, Hakan (eds), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 112–123.Google Scholar

Gross, Oren, ‘The Grave Breaches System and the Armed Conflict in the Former Yugoslavia’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, Spring 1995, pp. 783–829.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, ‘The Grave Breaches Regime as Customary International Law’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, Spring 2009, pp. 683–701.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.Google Scholar

Knuckey, Sarah, ‘Murder in Common Article 3’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 449–467.Google Scholar

Kreβ, Claus, ‘War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflict and the Emerging System of International Criminal Justice’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 30, 2000, pp. 103–178.Google Scholar

La Haye, Eve, ‘The elaboration of elements for war crimes’, in Lattanzi, Flavia and Schabas, William A. (eds), Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Vol. II, Il Sirente Publishers, Ripa di Fagnano Alto, 2004, pp. 305–331.Google Scholar

La Haye, Eve, War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts, Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mettraux, Guénaël, International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ken, ‘The Contribution of the ICTY to the Grave Breaches Regime’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 4, September 2009, pp. 743–761.Google Scholar

Werle, Gerhard and Jessberger, Florian, Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiss, Robin, ‘Völkerstrafgesetzbuch § 8 Kriegsverbrechen gegen Personen’, in Safferling, Christoph (ed.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, Band 8. Nebenstrafrecht III, 3rd edition, C.H. Beck, Munich, 2018, pp. 1323–1392.Google Scholar

Cameron, Lindsey and Chetail, Vincent, Privatizing War: Private Military and Security Companies under Public International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 539–570.Google Scholar

d’Argent, Pierre, Les réparations de guerre en droit international public. La responsabilité internationale des États à l’épreuve de la guerre, Bruylant, Brussels, 2002.Google Scholar

David, Eric, Principes de droit des conflits armés, 6th edition, Bruylant, Brussels, 2019.Google Scholar

Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, ‘Reparation for violations of international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 85, No. 851, September 2003, pp. 529–553.Google Scholar

Kalshoven, Frits, ‘State Responsibility for Warlike Acts of The Armed Forces’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 40, 1991, pp. 827–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalshoven, Frits, expert opinion, ‘Article 3 of the Convention [IV] Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed at The Hague, 18 October 1907’, in Fujita, Hisakazu, Suzuki, Isomi and Nagano, Kantaro (eds), War and the Rights of Individuals: Renaissance of Individual Compensation, Nippon Hyoron-sha, Tokyo, 1999, p. 37.Google Scholar

Sassòli, Marco, ‘State responsibility for violations of international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 84, No. 846, June 2002, pp. 401–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ‘The United Nations Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780 (1992)’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 88, No. 4, October 1994, pp. 784–805.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, ‘Fact-finding as a means of ensuring respect for international humanitarian law’, in von Heinegg, Wolff Heintschel and Epping, Volker (eds), International Humanitarian Law Facing New Challenges: Symposium in Honour of Knut Ipsen, Berlin, Springer, 2007, pp. 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boutruche, Théo, ‘Credible Fact-Finding and Allegations of International Humanitarian Law Violations: Challenges in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 2011, pp. 105–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boutruche, Théo, ‘Good offices, Conciliation and Enquiry’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 561–574.Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas, ‘The United Nations Truth Commission for El Salvador’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1994, pp. 498–544.Google Scholar

Bugnion, François, The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims, ICRC/Macmillan, Oxford, 2003, pp. 935–939.Google Scholar

Cerna, Christina M., ‘Human rights in armed conflict: Implementation of international humanitarian law norms by regional intergovernmental human rights bodies’, in Kalshoven, Frits and Sandoz, Yves (eds), Implementation of International Humanitarian Law/Mise en œuvre du droit international humanitaire, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989, pp. 31–67.Google Scholar

Cohen, Amichai and Shany, Yuval, ‘Beyond the Grave Breaches Regime: The Duty to Investigate Alleged Violations of International Law Governing Armed Conflicts’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2011, Vol. 14, 2012, pp. 37–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de La Pradelle, Paul, La Conférence diplomatique et les nouvelles Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949, Les Éditions internationales, Paris, 1951.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M. and Scott, Fairley H., ‘Procedural Due Process in Human Rights Fact-Finding by International Agencies’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 74, No. 2, April 1980, pp. 308–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasser, Hans-Peter, ‘Scrutiny’, Australian Year Book of International Law, Vol. 9, 1980, pp. 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, HPCR Advanced Practitioner’s Handbook on Commissions of Inquiry: Monitoring, Reporting and Fact-Finding, Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Resolution, March 2015.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ICRC, ‘Improving Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’, ICRC Expert Seminars, summary report to the 28th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, Geneva, 2–6 December 2003, Annex III.Google Scholar

ICRC, ‘Action by the International Committee of the Red Cross in the event of violations of international humanitarian law or of other fundamental rules protecting persons in situations of violence’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 858, June 2005, pp. 393–400.Google Scholar

ICRC, Strengthening Legal Protection for Victims of Armed Conflict, Report prepared for the 31st International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, ICRC, Geneva, 2011, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar

Ihraï, Saïd, ‘Les mécanismes d’établissement des faits dans les Conventions de Genève de 1949 et dans le Protocole I de 1977’, in Kalshoven, Frits and Sandoz, Yves (eds), Implementation of International Humanitarian Law/Mise en œuvre du droit international humanitaire, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989, pp. 132–168.Google Scholar

Orentlicher, Diane F., ‘Bearing Witness: The Art and Science of Human Rights Fact-Finding’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, Vol. 3, Spring 1990, pp. 83–135.Google Scholar

Stewart, James G., ‘The UN Commission of Inquiry on Lebanon: A Legal Appraisal’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 5, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1039–1059.Google Scholar

Vité, Sylvain, Les procédures internationales d’établissement des faits dans la mise en œuvre du droit international humanitaire, Bruylant, Brussels, 1999.Google Scholar

Waldman, Adir, Arbitrating Armed Conflict: Decisions of the Israel-Lebanon Monitoring Group, JurisNet, Huntington, 2003.Google Scholar

Zegveld, Liesbeth, ‘The importance of fact-finding missions under international humanitarian law’, in Meloni, Chantal and Tognoni, Gianni (eds), Is There a Court for Gaza? A Test Bench for International Justice, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2012, pp. 161–167.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 222–226 (Interpretation of treaties in more than one language) and 293–295 (Correction of errors).Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, ‘Article 79: Correction of error in texts or in certified copies of treaties’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1770–1796.Google Scholar

Ouguergouz, Fatsah, Villalpando, Santiago and Morgan-Foster, Jason, ‘Article 77: Functions of depositaries’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1715–1753.Google Scholar

Papaux, Alain and Samson, Rémi, ‘Article 33: Interpretation of treaties authenticated in two or more languages’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 866–884.Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 16–17, https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 147–152 (Plurilingual treaties).Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 38–62 (Original text).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 165–171 (Article 10), 450–462 (Article 33) and 955–969 (Article 79).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ardault, Karine and Dormoy, Daniel, ‘Article 40: Amendment of multilateral treaties’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 978–984.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 192–204 (successive treaties) and 232–244 (amendment).Google Scholar

Benvenuti, Paolo, ‘Relationship with Prior and Subsequent Treaties and Conventions’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 689–700.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, ‘Treaty Amendments’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 347–366.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, François, ‘Article 59: Termination or suspension of the operation of a treaty implied by conclusion of a later treaty’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1325–1347.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries, text adopted by the International Law Commission at its eighteenth session, in 1966, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission’s report covering the work of that session (para. 38), in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1966, Vol. II, 1967, pp. 187–274.Google Scholar

Rigaux, Anne and Simon, Denys, ‘Article 41: Agreement to modify multilateral treaties between certain parties only’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 986–1008.Google Scholar

Benvenuti, Paolo, ‘Relationships with prior and subsequent conventions and treaties’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 689–700.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries, text adopted by the International Law Commission at its eighteenth session, in 1966, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission’s report covering the work of that session (para. 38), in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1966, Vol. II, 1967, pp. 187–274.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 89–92 (Signature) and 107–109 (Obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty prior to its entry into force).Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, La Rosa, Anne-Marie and Mbengue, Makane Moïse, ‘Article 18: Obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty prior to its entry into force’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 369–403.Google Scholar

Bradley, Curtis A., ‘Treaty Signature’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 208–219.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, ‘Participation in the Geneva Conventions (1864–1949) and the Additional Protocols of 1977’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1984, pp. 803–812.Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 22–24, https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 29–44 (The conclusion and entry into force of treaties).Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 101–119 (Full powers and signatures).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 132–146 (Article 7), 154–164 (Article 9), 165–171 (Article 10), 242–253 (Article 18), 320–338 (Articles 19–23 – Subsequent developments) and 339–348 (Article 24).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 95–100 (Ratification), 114–144 (Reservations) and 283–296 (The depositary).Google Scholar

Boudreault, Lise S., ‘Les réserves apportées au Protocole additionnel I aux Conventions de Genève sur le droit humanitaire’, Revue québécoise de droit international, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1989–90, pp. 105–119, at 108–112.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Pilloud, Claude, ‘Reservations to the Geneva Conventions of 1949’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 16, No. 180, March 1976, pp. 107–124.Google Scholar

Pilloud, Claude, ‘Reservations to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (II)’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 16, No. 181, April 1976, pp. 163–187.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, Introduction to the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, 1995, pp. 77–84 (Reservations).Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 29–30, https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 39–42 (Expression of consent to be bound by a treaty) and 51–82 (Reservations).Google Scholar

Swaine, Edward T., ‘Treaty Reservations’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 277–301.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 120–133 (Deposit of binding instruments).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Anthony, ‘Article 24: Entry into force’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 628–637.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 145–158 (Entry into force) and 289–291 (Functions of the depositary).Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, Introduction to the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, 1995, pp. 66–68 (Entry into force).Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 13–14, https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 44–47 (Entry into force).Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 221–247 (Entry into force).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 339–348 (Article 24).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 101–103 (Accession) and 320–340 (Succession to treaties).Google Scholar

Caflisch, Lucius and Gamma, Serge, ‘La Suisse, dépositaire des Conventions de Genève’, Allgemeine schweizerische Militärzeitschrift, Vol. 165, No. 3, 1999, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th edition, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 127–142 (Creation and incidence of statehood) and 423–444 (Succession to rights and duties).Google Scholar

Daillier, Patrick, Forteau, Mathias, Pellet, Alain, Müller, Daniel and Nguyen, Quoc Dinh, Droit international public, 8th edition, Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ), Paris, 2009, pp. 599–619 (State succession).Google Scholar

David, Eric, Principes de droit des conflits armés, 6th edition, Bruylant, Brussels, 2019.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni, and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Hafner, Gerhard and Novak, Gregor, ‘State Succession in Respect of Treaties’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 396–427.Google Scholar

Kamminga, Menno T., ‘State Succession in Respect of Human Rights Treaties’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1996, pp. 469–484.Google Scholar

Rasulov, Akbar, ‘Revisiting State Succession to Humanitarian Treaties: Is There a Case for Automaticity?’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003, pp. 141–170.Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, ‘Participation in the Geneva Conventions (1864–1949) and the Additional Protocols of 1977’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 803–812.Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, p. 30, https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, p. 42 (Accession).Google Scholar

Stern, Brigitte, ‘La succession d’États’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye, Vol. 262, 1996, pp. 9–438, at 176–190.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Andreas, ‘State Succession in Treaties’, version of November 2006, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, http://www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Andreas and Devaney, James G., ‘Succession to treaties and the inherent limits of international law’, in Tams, Christian J., Tzanakopoulos, Antonios and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014, pp. 505–540.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Bruno, ‘La succession d’états et les Conventions de Genève’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 113–123.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 101–103 (Accession) and 289–293 (Functions of the depositary).Google Scholar

Daillier, Patrick, Forteau, Mathias, Pellet, Alain, Müller, Daniel and Nguyen, Quoc Dinh, Droit international public, 8th edition, Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ), Paris, 2009, pp. 599–619 (State succession).Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 18–19, https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 934–954 (Article 77).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Ouguergouz, Fatsah, Villalpando, Santiago and Morgan-Foster, Jason, ‘Article 77: Functions of depositaries’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1715–1753.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 934–946 (Article 77).Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘The specificities of humanitarian law’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva/The Hague, 1984, pp. 265–280.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 245–272 (Duration and termination).Google Scholar

Bannelier, Karine, ‘Article 43: Obligations imposed by international law independently of a treaty’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1031–1043.Google Scholar

Bernstorff, Jochen von, ‘Martens Clause’, version of December 2009, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, http://www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982, p. 44.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, 7th edition, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky?’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2000, pp. 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conférence internationale de la paix, The Hague, 18 May–29 July 1899, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague, Imprimerie nationale, 1899, Sommaire général,Google Scholar

– Première partie,Google Scholar

– Troisième partie (Deuxième Commission).Google Scholar

Crawford, Emily, ‘The Modern Relevance of the Martens Clause’, Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 11/27, 2011, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Empell, Hans-Michael, ‘Die Martens’sche Klausel – grundlegende Norm des humanitären Völkerrechts oder Vorschrift ohne Wert?’, Humanitäres Völkerrecht – Informationsschriften, Vol. 22, 2009, pp. 145–153.Google Scholar

Graditsky, Thomas, ‘Bref retour sur l’origine de la clause de Martens: Une contribution belge méconnue’, in Grignon, Julia (ed.), Hommage à Jean Pictet par le Concours de droit international humanitaire Jean-Pictet, Editions Yvon Blais, Cowansville and Schulthess Editions Romandes, Geneva, 2016.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Historical Development and Legal Basis’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, La bonne foi en droit international public, Publications de l’Institut universitaire de hautes études internationales, Geneva, 2000, pp. 1770–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meron, Theodor, ‘The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No. 1, January 2000, pp. 78–89.Google Scholar

Meyrowitz, Henri, ‘Réflexions sur le fondement du droit de la guerre’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva/The Hague, 1984, pp. 419–431.Google Scholar

Miyazaki, Shigeki, ‘The Martens Clause and International Humanitarian Law’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva/The Hague, 1984, pp. 433–444.Google Scholar

Münch, Fritz, ‘Die Martens’sche Klausel und die Grundlagen des Völkerrechts’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 36, 1976, pp. 347–373.Google Scholar

Nishimura Hayashi, Mika, ‘The Martens Clause and Military Necessity’, in Hensel, Howard M. (ed.) The Legitimate Use of Military Force – The Just War Tradition and the Customary Law of Armed Conflict, Ashgate, Aldershot, 2008, pp. 135–159.Google Scholar

Pustogarov, Vladimir V., ‘The Martens Clause in International Law’, Journal of the History of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1999, pp. 125–135.Google Scholar

Rensmann, Thilo, ‘Die Humanisierung des Völkerrechts durch das ius in bello – Von der Martens’schen Klausel zur “Responsibility to Protect”’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2008, pp. 111–128.Google Scholar

Salter, Michael, ‘Reinterpreting Competing Interpretations of the Scope and Potential of the Martens Clause’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2012, pp. 403–437.Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, p. 14, https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

Schircks, Rhea, Die Martens’sche Klausel, Rezeption und Rechtsqualität, Dissertation, University of Zurich, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2002.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 181–194 (Termination and suspension of operation of treaties).Google Scholar

Sperduti, Giuseppe, Lezioni di diritto internazionale, Giuffrè, Milan, 1958, pp. 68–74.Google Scholar

Spieker, Heike, ‘Martens Klausel’, Humanitäres Völkerrecht – Informationsschriften, Vol. 1, 1988, p. 46.Google Scholar

Thürer, Daniel, International Humanitarian Law: Theory, Practice, Context, Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law, 2011, pp. 398–402.Google Scholar

Ticehurst, Rupert, ‘The Martens Clause and the Laws of Armed Conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 37, No. 317, April 1997, pp. 125–134.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 259–262 (Suspension, termination).Google Scholar

Veuthey, Michel, ‘Public Conscience in International Humanitarian Law Today’, in Fischer, Horst, Froissart, Ulrike, Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff and Raap, Christian (eds), Krisensicherung und Humanitärer Schutz – Crisis Management and Humanitarian Protection, Festschrift für Dieter Fleck, Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2004, pp. 611–642.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 681–689 (Article 54).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 297–307 (Registration and publication).Google Scholar

Hinojal-Oyarbide, Arancha and Rosenboom, Annebeth, ‘Managing the Process of Treaty Formation – Depositaries and Registration’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 248–276.Google Scholar

Jacqué, Jean-Paul, in Cot, Jean-Pierre and Pellet, Alain (eds), La Charte des Nations Unies. Commentaire article par article, Article 102, Vol. II, Economica, Paris, 2005, pp. 2117–2132.Google Scholar

Klein, Pierre, ‘Article 80: Registration and publication of treaties’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1797–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martens, Ernst, ‘Article 102’, in Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte, Georg and Paulus, Andreas (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, Vol. II, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 2089–2109.Google Scholar

Ouguergouz, Fatsah, Villalpando, Santiago and Morgan-Foster, Jason, ‘Article 77: Functions of depositaries’, in Olivier, Corten and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1715–1753, at 1748–1750.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, Introduction to the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, 1995, pp. 70–71 (Registration and publication).Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 37–40, https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Handbook, Revised edition, 2012, pp. 29–38.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 944 (Article 77) and 970–976 (Article 80).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 381–383 (Testimonium).Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 63–72 (Certified copies).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar