Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T18:34:00.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Article 3 - Conflicts not of an international character

from Part I - General Provisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2021

Compiled by
International Committee of the Red Cross
Get access

Summary

Among the many important advances in international humanitarian law brought bythe adoption of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, Article 3 stands out in particular.With its inclusion, States agreed for the first time on regulating, in aninternational treaty framework, what they described as ‘armed conflict not of aninternational character’. Common Article 3 represented one of the firstprovisions of international law that dealt with what was at the time consideredby States as being exclusively their domestic affair. The provision is common tothe four Geneva Conventions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention
Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War
 , pp. 141 - 347
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Abi-Saab, Rosemary, Droit humanitaire et conflits internes: Origines et évolution de la réglementation internationale, Henry Dunant Institute, Geneva, 1986.Google Scholar
Ador, Gustave and Moynier, Gustave, ‘Les destinées de la Convention de Genève pendant la guerre de Serbie’, Bulletin international des sociétés de secours aux militaires blessés, Vol. 7, No. 28, 1876, pp. 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duculesco, Victor, ‘Effet de la reconnaissance de l’état de belligérance par les tiers, y compris les Organisations internationales, sur le statut juridique des conflits armés à caractère non international’, Revue générale de droit international public, Vol. 79, 1975, pp. 125–151.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, Recognition in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, (ed.), Oppenheim’s International Law, 7th edition, Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1952.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko and Hadzi-Vidanovic, Vidan, ‘A taxonomy of armed conflict’, in White, Nigel D. and Henderson, Christian (eds), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Jus post Bellum, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013, pp. 256–314.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, The Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Moynier, Gustave, Étude sur la Convention de Genève pour l’amélioration du sort des militaires blessés dans les armées en campagne (1864 et 1868), Librairie de Joël Cherbuliez, Paris, 1870.Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C., War and the Law of Nations: A General History, Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘Historical Development and Legal Basis’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law: A Treatise, Vol. II, War and Neutrality, 2nd edition, Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1912.Google Scholar
Padelford, Norman J., ‘The International Non-Intervention Agreement and the Spanish Civil War’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1937, pp. 578–603.Google Scholar
Ramelli Arteaga, Alejandro, Derecho Internacional Humanitario y Estado de Beligerancia, 2nd edition, Externado University of Colombia, Bogotá, 2004.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abi-Saab, Rosemary, Droit humanitaire et conflits internes: Origines et évolution de la réglementation internationale, Henry Dunant Institute, Geneva, 1986.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 32–79.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kenneth, ‘Targeted Killing and Drone Warfare: How We Came to Debate Whether There is a “Legal Geography of War”’, American University Washington College of Law Research Paper, No. 2011-16, 2011, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Arimatsu, Louise, ‘Territory, Boundaries and the Law of Armed Conflict’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 157–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Rogier, ‘Transnational Armed Conflict: Does it Exist?’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 114–128.Google Scholar
Bartels, Rogier, ‘From Jus In Bello to Jus Post Bellum: When Do Non-International Armed Conflicts End?’, in Stahn, Carsten, Easterday, Jennifer S. and Iverson, Jens (eds), Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 297–314.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Terrorism and Armed Conflict: Insights from a Law & Literature Perspective’, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, Laurie R., ‘Defining the Battlefield in Contemporary Conflict and Counterterrorism: Understanding the Parameters of the Zone of Combat’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, ‘War Crimes’, in Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola and Jones, John R.W.D. (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Vol. IA, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 379–426.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, pp. 649–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condorelli, Luigi, ‘War Crimes and Internal Conflicts in the Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in Politi, Mauro and Nesi, Giuseppe (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Challenge to Impunity, Ashgate, Aldershot, 2001, pp. 107–117.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey S., ‘Hamdan, Lebanon, and the Regulation of Hostilities: The Need to Recognize a Hybrid Category of Armed Conflict’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2007, pp. 295–355.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey S., ‘Geography of Armed Conflict: Why it is a Mistake to Fish for the Red Herring’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 89, 2013, pp. 77–107.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey S. and Jensen, Eric Talbot, ‘Transnational Armed Conflict: A “Principled” Approach to the Regulation of Counter-Terror Combat Operations’, Israel Law Review, Vol. 42, 2009, pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, Anthony, The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Eric, Principes de droit des conflits armés, 6th edition, Bruylant, Brussels, 2019.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘Get off my cloud: cyber warfare, international humanitarian law, and the protection of civilians’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 94, No. 886, June 2012, pp. 533–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, Tristan, ‘The geographic reach of IHL: The law and current challenges’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 105–113. (2013a)Google Scholar
Ferraro, Tristan, ‘The applicability and application of international humanitarian law to multinational forces’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 95, No. 891, December 2013, pp. 561–612. (2013b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Dieter, ‘The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 581–610.Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter, ‘International humanitarian law: An introduction’, in Haug, Hans (ed.), Humanity for All: The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, Henry Dunant Institute, Geneva, 1993, pp. 491–592.Google Scholar
Grignon, Julia, L’applicabilité temporelle du droit international humanitaire, Schulthess, Geneva, 2014.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICRC, International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts, Report prepared for the 28th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, ICRC, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar
ICRC, International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts, Report prepared for the 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, ICRC, Geneva, 2007.Google Scholar
ICRC, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law, by Melzer, Nils, ICRC, Geneva, 2009.Google Scholar
ICRC, International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts, Report prepared for the 31st International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, ICRC, Geneva, 2011.Google Scholar
ICRC, The Use of Force in Armed Conflicts: Interplay between the Conduct of Hostilities and Law Enforcement Paradigms, Expert Meeting, Report prepared and edited by Gaggioli, Gloria, ICRC, Geneva, 2013.Google Scholar
ICRC, International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts, Report prepared for the 32nd International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, ICRC, Geneva, 2015.Google Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 43–78. (2013b)Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Keynote Address: The Obama Administration and International Law’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Vol. 104, 2010, pp. 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, Robert and Hyde, Richard, An Introduction to the International Law of Armed Conflicts, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2008.Google Scholar
Kreß, Claus, ‘Some Reflections on the International Legal Framework Governing Transnational Armed Conflicts’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2010, pp. 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubell, Noam and Derejko, Nathan, ‘A Global Battlefield? Drones and the Geographical Scope of Armed Conflict’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2013, pp. 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melzer, Nils, Targeted Killing in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2000, pp. 239–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, pp. 553–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-Up’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, pp. 669–694. (2007a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘Lessons for human rights and humanitarian law in the war on terror: comparing Hamdan and the Israeli Targeted Killings case’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 866, June 2007, pp. 373–393. (2007b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘End of IHL application: Overview and challenges’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘The Applicability of the Conventions to “Transnational” and “Mixed” Conflicts’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 27–50.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko and Hadzi-Vidanovic, Vidan, ‘A taxonomy of armed conflict’, in White, Nigel D. and Henderson, Christian (eds), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Jus post bellum, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013, pp. 256–314.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, ‘The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 391–414.Google Scholar
Pejic, Jelena, ‘Status of armed conflicts’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth and Breau, Susan (eds), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
Pejic, Jelena, ‘The protective scope of Common Article 3: more than meets the eye’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 881, March 2011, pp. 189–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, Sasha, ‘Global Armed Conflict? The Threshold of Extraterritorial Non-International Armed Conflicts’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 89, 2013, pp. 696–743.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Transnational Armed Groups and International Humanitarian Law’, HPCR Occasional Paper Series, Winter 2006, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine A. and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War?, Vol. I, 3rd edition, ICRC, Geneva, 2011.Google Scholar
Schindler, Dietrich, ‘The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, Vol. 163, 1979, pp. 117–164.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Charting the Legal Geography of Non-International Armed Conflict’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 90, 2014, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Schöndorf, Roy S., ‘Extra-State Armed Conflicts: Is There a Need for a New Legal Regime?’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1–78.Google Scholar
Shraga, Daphna, ‘The United Nations as an Actor Bound by International Humanitarian Law’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1998, pp. 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shraga, Daphna, ‘The applicability of international humanitarian law to peace operations, from rejection to acceptance’, in Beruto, Gian Luca (ed.), International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights and Peace Operations, Proceedings of the 31st Round Table on Current Problems of International Humanitarian Law, 4–6 September 2008, International Institute of Humanitarian Law, San Remo, 2008, pp. 82–89.Google Scholar
Shraga, Daphna and Zacklin, Ralph, ‘The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: Conceptual, Legal and Practical Issues’, Report to the Symposium on Humanitarian Action and Peacekeeping Operations, 22–24 June 1994, ICRC, Geneva, 2004, pp. 39–48.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Stewart, James G., ‘Towards a single definition of armed conflict in international humanitarian law: A critique of internationalized armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 85, No. 850, June 2003, pp. 313–350.Google Scholar
Vité, Sylvain, ‘Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: legal concepts and actual situations’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 873, March 2009, pp. 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hebel, Herman and Robinson, Darryl, ‘Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court’, in Lee, Roy S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute – Issues, Negotiations, Results, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1999, pp. 79–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugnion, François, The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims, ICRC/Macmillan, Oxford, 2003. (2003a)Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The status of rebels under the 1977 Geneva Protocol on Non-International Armed Conflicts’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1981, pp. 416–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, David A., ‘The Historical Background of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1979, pp. 37–69.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Ola, ‘Compliance with International Humanitarian Law in Multinational Peace Operations’, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2009, pp. 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, Tristan, ‘The applicability and application of international humanitarian law to multinational forces’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 95, No. 891, December 2013, pp. 561–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘The applicability of international humanitarian law to organized armed groups’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 882, June 2011, pp. 443–461.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, Porretto, Gabriele and Vité, Sylvain, L’application du droit international humanitaire et des droits de l’homme aux organisations internationales: Forces de paix et administrations civiles transitoires, Bruylant, Brussels, 2005.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, The Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Daragh, ‘How International Humanitarian Law Treaties Bind Non-State Armed Groups’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2015, pp. 101–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naert, Frederik, International Law Aspects of the EU’s Security and Defence Policy, with a Particular Focus on the Law of Armed Conflict and Human Rights, Intersentia, Antwerp, 2010.Google Scholar
Schindler, Dietrich, ‘The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, Vol. 163, 1979, pp. 117–164.Google Scholar
Shraga, Daphna, ‘The United Nations as an Actor Bound by International Humanitarian Law’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1998, pp. 64–81.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘The Addressees of Common Article 3’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 415–431.Google Scholar
Zegveld, Liesbeth, The Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abresch, William, ‘A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2005, pp. 741–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, James E., ‘Application of the Law of War to Internal Conflict’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1973, pp. 345–384.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Geneva Protocols of 1977 on the Humanitarian law of Armed Conflict and Customary International Law’, UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 3, 1984, pp. 55–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, Gerald I.A.D., ‘The Geneva Conventions of 1949’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, Vol. 114, 1965, pp. 59–165.Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter, ‘The Sixth Annual American Red Cross-Washington College of Law Conference on International Humanitarian Law: A Workshop on Customary International Law and the 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions; Remarks of Hans-Peter Gasser’, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1987, pp. 415–538, at 477–481.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICRC, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law, by Melzer, Nils, ICRC, Geneva, 2009.Google Scholar
ICRC, International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts, Report prepared for the 31st International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, ICRC, Geneva, 2011.Google Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘Friend or Foe? On the Protective Reach of the Law of Armed Conflict: a Note on the SCSL Trial Chamber’s Judgment in the Case of “Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon and Gbao”’, in Matthee, Mariëlle, Toebes, Brigit and Brus, Marcel (eds), Armed Conflict and International Law: In Search of the Human Face, Liber Amicorum in Memory of Avril McDonald, Asser Press, The Hague, 2013, pp. 285–302. (2013c)Google Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘The Beneficiaries of the Rights Stemming from Common Article 3’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 433–447.Google Scholar
Melzer, Nils, Targeted Killing in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘Application of Humanitarian Law in Non-international Armed Conflicts: Remarks by Theodor Meron’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Vol. 85, 1991, pp. 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejic, Jelena, ‘The protective scope of Common Article 3: more than meets the eye’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 881, March 2011, pp. 189–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A.P.V., Law on the Battlefield, 3rd edition, Manchester University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Terrorism and War’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2006, pp. 959–981.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘The Role of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in New Types of Armed Conflicts’, in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 34–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Watkin, Kenneth, ‘21st Century Conflict and International Humanitarian Law: Status Quo or Change?’, in Schmitt, Michael N. and Pejic, Jelena (eds), International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2007, pp. 265–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zegveld, Liesbeth, The Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugnion, François, ‘Jus ad bellum, jus in bello and non-international armed conflicts’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 6, 2003, pp. 167–198. (2003b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condorelli, Luigi and Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, ‘Quelques remarques à propos de l’obligation des Etats de “respecter et faire respecter” le droit international humanitaire “en toutes circonstances”’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Coomaraswamy, Radhika, ‘Sexual Violence During Wartime’, in Helen Durham and Tracey Gurd (eds), Listening to the Silences: Women and War, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2005, pp. 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, David A., ‘The Historical Background of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1979, pp. 37–69.Google Scholar
Gardam, Judith, ‘Women and Armed Conflict: The Response of International Humanitarian Law’, in Durham, Helen and Gurd, Tracey (eds) Listening to the Silences: Women and War, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2005, pp. 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafetz, Jonathan, ‘Detention at sea: the persistence of territorial constraints on constitutional rights’, in Fabbrini, Federico and Jackson, Vicki C. (eds), Constitutionalism Across Borders in the Struggle Against Terrorism, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 233–259.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits and Zegveld, Liesbeth, Constraints on the Waging of War: An Introduction to International Humanitarian Law, 4th edition, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘Protection of the Wounded, Sick, and Shipwrecked’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 321–357. (2013a)Google Scholar
Lindsey, Charlotte, Women facing war: ICRC study on the impact of armed conflict on women, ICRC, Geneva, 2001.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Charlotte, ‘The Impact of Armed Conflict on Women’, in Durham, Helen and Gurd, Tracey (eds), Listening to the Silences: Women and War, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2005, pp. 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modarai, Gordon, O’Connell, David, Kelly, Timothy and Farrant, James, ‘The Seizure of Abu Anas Al-Libi: An International Law Assessment’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 89, No. 817, 2013, pp. 817–838.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, The Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary, 2nd revised edition, Engel, N.P., Kehl am Rhein, 2005.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘Historical Development and Legal Basis’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Pejic, Jelena, ‘Non-discrimination and armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 83, No. 841, March 2001, pp. 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A.P.V., Law on the Battlefield, 3rd edition, Manchester University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Rona, Gabor and McGuire, Robert J., ‘The Principle of Non-Discrimination’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine A. and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War?, Vol. I, 3rd edition, ICRC, Geneva, 2011.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J., ‘The Use of Force against Terrorists’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2009, pp. 359–397.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, ‘Article 25: Individual criminal responsibility’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 979–1029.Google Scholar
Bellal, Annyssa, Giacca, Gilles and Casey-Maslen, Stuart, ‘International law and armed non-state actors in Afghanistan’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 881, March 2011, pp. 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, Michael, ‘The status of captured fighters in non-international armed conflict’, in Tomuschat, Christian, Lagrange, Evelyne and Oeter, Stefan (eds), The Right to Life, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2010, pp. 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Geneva Protocols of 1977 on the Humanitarian law of Armed Conflict and Customary International Law’, UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 3, 1984, pp. 55–118.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, ‘Wilful killing’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 329–331.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘The right to life in armed conflict: does international humanitarian law provide all the answers?’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 88, No. 864, December 2006, pp. 881–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter, ‘The Sixth Annual American Red Cross-Washington College of Law Conference on International Humanitarian Law: A Workshop on Customary International Law and the 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions; Remarks of Hans-Peter Gasser’, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1987, pp. 415–538, at 477–481.Google Scholar
Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, ‘The right to life and the relationship between human rights and humanitarian law’, in Tomuschat, Christian, Lagrange, Evelyne and Oeter, Stefan (eds), The Right to Life, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2010, pp. 121–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Homicide Law in Comparative Perspective, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
ICRC, The Use of Force in Armed Conflicts: Interplay between the Conduct of Hostilities and Law Enforcement Paradigms, Expert Meeting, Report prepared and edited by Gaggioli, Gloria, ICRC, Geneva, 2013.Google Scholar
Knuckey, Sarah, ‘Murder in Common Article 3’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 449–467.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘Application of Humanitarian Law in Non-international Armed Conflicts: Remarks by Theodor Meron’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Vol. 85, 1991, pp. 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary, 2nd revised edition, N.P. Engel, Kehl, 2005.Google Scholar
Ovey, Clare and White, Robin C.A., Jacobs & White: The European Convention on Human Rights, 4th edition, Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Watkin, Kenneth, ‘21st Century Conflict and International Humanitarian Law: Status Quo or Change?’, in Schmitt, Michael N. and Pejic, Jelena (eds), International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2007, pp. 265–296.Google Scholar
Zegveld, Liesbeth, The Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiss, Robin, ‘Mutilations’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 528–568.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Haye, Eve, ‘Mutilation and medical or scientific experiments: Article 8(2)(b)(x)’, in Lee, Roy S. and Friman, Hakan (eds), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 164–167. (2001a)Google Scholar
La Haye, Eve, ‘Violations of Common Article 3’, in Lee, Roy S. and Friman, Hakan (eds), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 207–213. (2001b)Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiss, Robin, ‘Mutilations’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 528–568, at 551.Google Scholar
Bank, Roland, ‘Das Verbot von Folter, unmenschlicher oder erniedrigender Behandlung oder Strafe’, in Grote, Rainer and Marauhn, Thilo (eds), EMRK/GG, Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2006, pp. 479–534.Google Scholar
Burgers, J. Herman and Danelius, Hans, The United Nations Convention against Torture: A Handbook on the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988.Google Scholar
Dewulf, Steven, The Signature of Evil: (Re)Defining Torture in International Law, Intersentia, Antwerp, 2011.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 194–227.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘“In truth the leitmotiv”: the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment in international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Malcolm, ‘Getting to Grips with Torture’, in The Definition of Torture: Proceedings of an Expert Seminar, Association for the Prevention of Torture, Geneva, 2001, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, ‘Challenges to the absolute nature of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2005, pp. 674–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, ‘What Practices Constitute Torture?: US and UN standards’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2006, pp. 809–841.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred and Janik, Ralph R.A., ‘Torture, Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 317–342.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred and McArthur, Elizabeth, The United Nations Convention Against Torture: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Hernán, ‘The worst scars are in the mind: psychological torture’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 591–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S., ‘The definition(s) of torture in international law’, Current Legal Problems, Vol. 55, 2002, pp. 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S., ‘The prohibition of torture: absolute means absolute’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2006, pp. 145–160.Google Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S. and Pollard, Matt, The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Röling, B.V.A. and Rüter, C.F., The Tokyo Judgment: The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (I.M.T.F.E.), 29 April 1946–12 November 1948, 2 volumes, University Press, Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, H. Wayne, ‘Hostages or Prisoners of War: War Crimes at Dinner’, Military Law Review, Vol. 149, 1995, pp. 241–274.Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter and Dörmann, Knut, ‘Protection of the Civilian Population’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 231–320, at paras 508 and 535.Google Scholar
Gucciardo, Dorotea, ‘Hostages’, in Vance, Jonathan F. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Prisoners of War and Internment, 2nd edition, Grey House Publishing, Millerton, New York, 2006, pp. 183–186.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ellen and Salvin, Marina, ‘The Taking of Hostages in Theory and Practice’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1944, pp. 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Irène and Palmieri, Daniel, ‘A haunting figure: The hostage through the ages’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 857, March 2005, pp. 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Arthur K., ‘Editorial Comment: The Execution of Hostages’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, 1942, pp. 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Joseph J., Terrorism and Hostages in International Law: A Commentary on the Hostages Convention 1979, Grotius Publications, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude, ‘La question des otages et les Conventions de Genève’, Revue international de la Croix-Rouge, Vol. 32, No. 378, June 1950, pp. 430–447.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, Robert, ‘International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages: Another International Community Step Against Terrorism’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1980, pp. 169–195.Google Scholar
Salinas Burgos, Hernán, ‘The taking of hostages and international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 29, No. 270, June 1989, pp. 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘War Crimes before the Special Court for Sierra Leone: Child Soldiers, Hostages, Peacekeepers and Collective Punishments’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1009–1034. (2010a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tuck, David, ‘Taking of Hostages’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 297–316.Google Scholar
Wright, Lord, ‘The Killing of Hostages as a War Crime’, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 25, 1948, pp. 296–310.Google Scholar
Barber, Rebecca, ‘Facilitating humanitarian assistance in international humanitarian and human rights law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 874, June 2009, pp. 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, James E., ‘Application of the Law of War to Internal Conflict’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1973, pp. 345–384.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 331–344.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘Judicial Guarantees’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 469–494.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve Their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, pp. 5–51.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Courts of Armed Opposition Groups: Fair Trials or Summary Justice?’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2009, pp. 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Somer, Jonathan, ‘Jungle justice: passing sentence on the equality of belligerents in non-international armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 655–690.Google Scholar
Willms, Jan, ‘Justice through Armed Groups’ Governance – An Oxymoron?’, SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 40, October 2012.Google Scholar
Bastick, Megan, Grimm, Karin and Kunz, Rahel, Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict: Global Overview and Implications for the Security Sector, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2007.Google Scholar
Brammertz, Serge and Jarvis, Michelle (eds), Prosecuting Conflict-Related Sexual Violence at the ICTY, Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Durham, Helen, ‘International Humanitarian Law and the Protection of Women’, in Durham, Helen and Gurd, Tracey (eds), Listening to the Silences: Women and War, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2005, pp. 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardam, Judith G. and Jarvis, Michelle J., Women, Armed Conflict and International Law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, Medina and Puechguirbal, Nadine, ‘From helplessness to agency: examining the plurality of women’s experiences in armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 92, No. 877, March 2010, pp. 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action: Reducing risk, promoting resilience and aiding recovery, 2015.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Charlotte, Women facing war: ICRC Study on the impact of armed conflict on women, ICRC, Geneva, 2001.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Lost in translation: UN responses to sexual violence against men and boys in situations of armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 92, No. 877, March 2010, pp. 259–277. (2010b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solangon, Sarah and Patel, Preeti, ‘Sexual violence against men in countries affected by armed conflict’, Journal of Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2012, pp. 417–442.Google Scholar
Viseur Sellers, Patricia, ‘The Context of Sexual Violence: Sexual Violence as Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, in McDonald, Gabrielle Kirk and Swaak-Goldman, Olivia (eds), Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2000, pp. 263–332.Google Scholar
Viseur Sellers, Patricia and Rosenthal, Indira, ‘Rape and Other Sexual Violence’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Marco Sassòli (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 343–368.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, World report on violence and health, Report edited by Krug, Etienne G. et al., WHO, Geneva, 2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization, Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence, WHO, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar
Bellinger III, John B. and Padmanabhan, Vijay M., ‘Detention Operations in Contemporary Conflicts: Four Challenges for the Geneva Conventions and Other Existing Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 105, No. 2, 2011, pp. 201–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Legal Opinion on the December 18, 2005 “Arrangement for the Transfer of Detainees between the Canadian Forces and the Ministry of Defence of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan”’, Liu Institute for Global Issues, 7 April 2006.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘Transfers of detainees: legal framework, non-refoulement and contemporary challenges’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, No. 871, September 2008, pp. 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, ‘There’s no place like home: States’ obligations in relation to transfers of persons’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, No. 871, September 2008, pp. 703–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gisel, Laurent, ‘The principle of non-refoulement in relation to transfers’, in Detention in Armed Conflicts, Proceedings of the 15th Bruges Colloquium, 16–17 October 2014, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium, No. 45, Autumn 2015, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James C., ‘Leveraging Asylum’, Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2010, pp. 503–536.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Jonathan, ‘Transferring Wartime Detainees and a State’s Responsibility to Prevent Torture’, American University National Security Law Brief, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Elihu and Bethlehem, Daniel, ‘The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement: Opinion’, in Feller, Erika, Türk, Volker and Nicholson, Frances (eds), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 87–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2000, pp. 239–278.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Mike, ‘The Syrian Crisis and the Principle of Non-Refoulement’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 89, 2013, pp. 776–801.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco and Marie-Louise, Tougas, ‘International Law Issues Raised by the Transfer of Detainees by Canadian Forces in Afghanistan’, McGill Law Journal, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2011, pp. 959–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoglund, Lena, ‘Diplomatic Assurances Against Torture – An Effective Strategy? A Review of Jurisprudence and Examination of the Arguments’, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2008, pp. 319–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambos, Kai, ‘Article 25: Individual criminal responsibility’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 979–1029.Google Scholar
Bellal, Annyssa, Giacca, Gilles and Casey-Maslen, Stuart, ‘International law and armed non-state actors in Afghanistan’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 881, March 2011, pp. 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, Michael, ‘The status of captured fighters in non-international armed conflict’, in Tomuschat, Christian, Lagrange, Evelyne and Oeter, Stefan (eds), The Right to Life, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2010, pp. 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Geneva Protocols of 1977 on the Humanitarian law of Armed Conflict and Customary International Law’, UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 3, 1984, pp. 55–118.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, ‘Wilful killing’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 329–331.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘The right to life in armed conflict: does international humanitarian law provide all the answers?’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 88, No. 864, December 2006, pp. 881–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter, ‘The Sixth Annual American Red Cross-Washington College of Law Conference on International Humanitarian Law: A Workshop on Customary International Law and the 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions; Remarks of Hans-Peter Gasser’, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1987, pp. 415–538, at 477–481.Google Scholar
Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, ‘The right to life and the relationship between human rights and humanitarian law’, in Tomuschat, Christian, Lagrange, Evelyne and Oeter, Stefan (eds), The Right to Life, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2010, pp. 121–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Homicide Law in Comparative Perspective, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
ICRC, The Use of Force in Armed Conflicts: Interplay between the Conduct of Hostilities and Law Enforcement Paradigms, Expert Meeting, Report prepared and edited by Gaggioli, Gloria, ICRC, Geneva, 2013.Google Scholar
Knuckey, Sarah, ‘Murder in Common Article 3’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 449–467.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘Application of Humanitarian Law in Non-international Armed Conflicts: Remarks by Theodor Meron’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Vol. 85, 1991, pp. 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary, 2nd revised edition, N.P. Engel, Kehl, 2005.Google Scholar
Ovey, Clare and White, Robin C.A., Jacobs & White: The European Convention on Human Rights, 4th edition, Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Watkin, Kenneth, ‘21st Century Conflict and International Humanitarian Law: Status Quo or Change?’, in Schmitt, Michael N. and Pejic, Jelena (eds), International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2007, pp. 265–296.Google Scholar
Zegveld, Liesbeth, The Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiss, Robin, ‘Mutilations’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 528–568.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Haye, Eve, ‘Mutilation and medical or scientific experiments: Article 8(2)(b)(x)’, in Lee, Roy S. and Friman, Hakan (eds), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 164–167. (2001a)Google Scholar
La Haye, Eve, ‘Violations of Common Article 3’, in Lee, Roy S. and Friman, Hakan (eds), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 207–213. (2001b)Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiss, Robin, ‘Mutilations’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 528–568, at 551.Google Scholar
Bank, Roland, ‘Das Verbot von Folter, unmenschlicher oder erniedrigender Behandlung oder Strafe’, in Grote, Rainer and Marauhn, Thilo (eds), EMRK/GG, Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2006, pp. 479–534.Google Scholar
Burgers, J. Herman and Danelius, Hans, The United Nations Convention against Torture: A Handbook on the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988.Google Scholar
Dewulf, Steven, The Signature of Evil: (Re)Defining Torture in International Law, Intersentia, Antwerp, 2011.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 194–227.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘“In truth the leitmotiv”: the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment in international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Malcolm, ‘Getting to Grips with Torture’, in The Definition of Torture: Proceedings of an Expert Seminar, Association for the Prevention of Torture, Geneva, 2001, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, ‘Challenges to the absolute nature of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2005, pp. 674–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, ‘What Practices Constitute Torture?: US and UN standards’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2006, pp. 809–841.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred and Janik, Ralph R.A., ‘Torture, Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 317–342.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred and McArthur, Elizabeth, The United Nations Convention Against Torture: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Hernán, ‘The worst scars are in the mind: psychological torture’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 591–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S., ‘The definition(s) of torture in international law’, Current Legal Problems, Vol. 55, 2002, pp. 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S., ‘The prohibition of torture: absolute means absolute’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2006, pp. 145–160.Google Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S. and Pollard, Matt, The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Röling, B.V.A. and Rüter, C.F., The Tokyo Judgment: The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (I.M.T.F.E.), 29 April 1946–12 November 1948, 2 volumes, University Press, Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, H. Wayne, ‘Hostages or Prisoners of War: War Crimes at Dinner’, Military Law Review, Vol. 149, 1995, pp. 241–274.Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter and Dörmann, Knut, ‘Protection of the Civilian Population’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 231–320, at paras 508 and 535.Google Scholar
Gucciardo, Dorotea, ‘Hostages’, in Vance, Jonathan F. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Prisoners of War and Internment, 2nd edition, Grey House Publishing, Millerton, New York, 2006, pp. 183–186.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ellen and Salvin, Marina, ‘The Taking of Hostages in Theory and Practice’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1944, pp. 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Irène and Palmieri, Daniel, ‘A haunting figure: The hostage through the ages’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 857, March 2005, pp. 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Arthur K., ‘Editorial Comment: The Execution of Hostages’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, 1942, pp. 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Joseph J., Terrorism and Hostages in International Law: A Commentary on the Hostages Convention 1979, Grotius Publications, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude, ‘La question des otages et les Conventions de Genève’, Revue international de la Croix-Rouge, Vol. 32, No. 378, June 1950, pp. 430–447.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, Robert, ‘International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages: Another International Community Step Against Terrorism’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1980, pp. 169–195.Google Scholar
Salinas Burgos, Hernán, ‘The taking of hostages and international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 29, No. 270, June 1989, pp. 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘War Crimes before the Special Court for Sierra Leone: Child Soldiers, Hostages, Peacekeepers and Collective Punishments’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1009–1034. (2010a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tuck, David, ‘Taking of Hostages’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 297–316.Google Scholar
Wright, Lord, ‘The Killing of Hostages as a War Crime’, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 25, 1948, pp. 296–310.Google Scholar
Barber, Rebecca, ‘Facilitating humanitarian assistance in international humanitarian and human rights law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 874, June 2009, pp. 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, James E., ‘Application of the Law of War to Internal Conflict’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1973, pp. 345–384.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 331–344.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘Judicial Guarantees’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 469–494.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve Their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, pp. 5–51.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Courts of Armed Opposition Groups: Fair Trials or Summary Justice?’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2009, pp. 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Somer, Jonathan, ‘Jungle justice: passing sentence on the equality of belligerents in non-international armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 655–690.Google Scholar
Willms, Jan, ‘Justice through Armed Groups’ Governance – An Oxymoron?’, SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 40, October 2012.Google Scholar
Bastick, Megan, Grimm, Karin and Kunz, Rahel, Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict: Global Overview and Implications for the Security Sector, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2007.Google Scholar
Brammertz, Serge and Jarvis, Michelle (eds), Prosecuting Conflict-Related Sexual Violence at the ICTY, Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Durham, Helen, ‘International Humanitarian Law and the Protection of Women’, in Durham, Helen and Gurd, Tracey (eds), Listening to the Silences: Women and War, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2005, pp. 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardam, Judith G. and Jarvis, Michelle J., Women, Armed Conflict and International Law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, Medina and Puechguirbal, Nadine, ‘From helplessness to agency: examining the plurality of women’s experiences in armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 92, No. 877, March 2010, pp. 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action: Reducing risk, promoting resilience and aiding recovery, 2015.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Charlotte, Women facing war: ICRC Study on the impact of armed conflict on women, ICRC, Geneva, 2001.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Lost in translation: UN responses to sexual violence against men and boys in situations of armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 92, No. 877, March 2010, pp. 259–277. (2010b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solangon, Sarah and Patel, Preeti, ‘Sexual violence against men in countries affected by armed conflict’, Journal of Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2012, pp. 417–442.Google Scholar
Viseur Sellers, Patricia, ‘The Context of Sexual Violence: Sexual Violence as Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, in McDonald, Gabrielle Kirk and Swaak-Goldman, Olivia (eds), Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2000, pp. 263–332.Google Scholar
Viseur Sellers, Patricia and Rosenthal, Indira, ‘Rape and Other Sexual Violence’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Marco Sassòli (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 343–368.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, World report on violence and health, Report edited by Krug, Etienne G. et al., WHO, Geneva, 2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization, Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence, WHO, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar
Bellinger III, John B. and Padmanabhan, Vijay M., ‘Detention Operations in Contemporary Conflicts: Four Challenges for the Geneva Conventions and Other Existing Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 105, No. 2, 2011, pp. 201–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Legal Opinion on the December 18, 2005 “Arrangement for the Transfer of Detainees between the Canadian Forces and the Ministry of Defence of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan”’, Liu Institute for Global Issues, 7 April 2006.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘Transfers of detainees: legal framework, non-refoulement and contemporary challenges’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, No. 871, September 2008, pp. 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, ‘There’s no place like home: States’ obligations in relation to transfers of persons’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, No. 871, September 2008, pp. 703–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gisel, Laurent, ‘The principle of non-refoulement in relation to transfers’, in Detention in Armed Conflicts, Proceedings of the 15th Bruges Colloquium, 16–17 October 2014, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium, No. 45, Autumn 2015, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James C., ‘Leveraging Asylum’, Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2010, pp. 503–536.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Jonathan, ‘Transferring Wartime Detainees and a State’s Responsibility to Prevent Torture’, American University National Security Law Brief, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Elihu and Bethlehem, Daniel, ‘The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement: Opinion’, in Feller, Erika, Türk, Volker and Nicholson, Frances (eds), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 87–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2000, pp. 239–278.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Mike, ‘The Syrian Crisis and the Principle of Non-Refoulement’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 89, 2013, pp. 776–801.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco and Marie-Louise, Tougas, ‘International Law Issues Raised by the Transfer of Detainees by Canadian Forces in Afghanistan’, McGill Law Journal, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2011, pp. 959–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoglund, Lena, ‘Diplomatic Assurances Against Torture – An Effective Strategy? A Review of Jurisprudence and Examination of the Arguments’, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2008, pp. 319–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debuf, Els, Captured in War: Lawful Internment in Armed Conflict, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2013.Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley S., ‘Administrative Detention in Armed Conflict’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2009, pp. 403–436.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Joanna, ‘Unlawful confinement as a war crime: the jurisprudence of the Yugoslav Tribunal and the common core of international humanitarian law applicable to contemporary armed conflicts’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2004, pp. 133–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, ‘Detention in Non-International Armed Conflicts’, in Watkin, Kenneth and Norris, Andrew J. (eds.), Non-International Armed Conflict in the Twenty-first Century, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 88, 2012, pp. 347–366.Google Scholar
Hafetz, Jonathan, ‘Detention at sea: the persistence of territorial constraints on constitutional rights’, in Fabbrini, Federico and Jackson, Vicki C. (eds), Constitutionalism Across Borders in the Struggle Against Terrorism, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 233–259.Google Scholar
Hampson, Françoise J., ‘Is Human Rights Law of Any Relevance to Military Operations in Afghanistan?’, in Schmitt, Michael N. (ed.), The War in Afghanistan: A Legal Analysis, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 85, 2009, pp. 485–524.Google Scholar
Heffes, Ezequiel, ‘Detentions by Armed Opposition Groups in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Towards a New Characterization of International Humanitarian Law’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2015, pp. 229–250.Google Scholar
ICRC, ‘Procedural principles and safeguards for internment/administrative detention in armed conflict and other situations of violence’, in International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts, Report prepared for the 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, Geneva, 2007, Annex 1, reproduced in International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 858, June 2005, pp. 375–391.Google Scholar
ICRC, Internment in Armed Conflict: Basic Rules and Challenges, Opinion Paper, November 2014.Google Scholar
Modarai, Gordon, O’Connell, David, Kelly, Timothy and Farrant, James, ‘The Seizure of Abu Anas Al-Libi: An International Law Assessment’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 89, No. 817, 2013, pp. 817–838.Google Scholar
Pejic, Jelena, ‘Procedural principles and safeguards for internment/administrative detention in armed conflict and other situations of violence’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 858, June 2005, pp. 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejic, Jelena, ‘Conflict Classification and the Law Applicable to Detention and the Use of Force’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 80–116.Google Scholar
Pejic, Jelena, ‘Detention in Armed Conflict’, in Saul, Ben and Akande, Dapo (eds), The Oxford Guide to International Humanitarian Law, Oxford University Press, 2020, pp. 277–297.Google Scholar
Rona, Gabor, ‘Is There a Way Out of the Non-International Armed Conflict Detention Dilemma?’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 91, 2015, pp. 32–59.Google Scholar
Rowe, Peter, ‘Is There a Right to Detain Civilians by Foreign Armed Forces during a Non-International Armed Conflict?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2012, pp. 697–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts, Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982.Google Scholar
Breau, Susan C., ‘Commentary on selected Rules from the ICRC Study: Protected persons and objects’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth and Breau, Susan C. (eds), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 169–203.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunant, Henry, A Memory of Solferino, ICRC, Geneva, reprint 1986.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.Google Scholar
ICRC, Management of Dead Bodies after Disasters: A Field Manual for First Responders, ICRC, Geneva, 2009.Google Scholar
ICRC, War Surgery: Working with Limited Resources in Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence, Vol. 1 by Christos Giannou and Marco Baldan and Vol. 2 by Christos Giannou, Marco Baldan and Åsa Molde, ICRC, Geneva, 2009 and 2013 respectively.Google Scholar
ICRC, First Aid in Armed Conflicts and Other Situations of Violence, ICRC, Geneva, 2010.Google Scholar
ICRC, Health Care in Danger: Violent Incidents Affecting the Delivery of Health Care, January 2012 to December 2013, ICRC, Geneva, 2014.Google Scholar
ICRC, Promoting Military Operational Practice that Ensures Safe Access to and Delivery of Health Care, ICRC, Geneva, 2014.Google Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘Protection of the Wounded, Sick, and Shipwrecked’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 321–357. (2013a)Google Scholar
Lindsey, Charlotte, Women facing war: ICRC Study on the impact of armed conflict on women, ICRC, Geneva, 2001.Google Scholar
Müller, Amrei, The Relationship between Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and International Humanitarian Law: An Analysis of Health-Related Issues in Non-International Armed Conflicts, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2013.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Abril Stoffels, Ruth, ‘Legal regulation of humanitarian assistance in armed conflict: Achievements and gaps’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 86, No. 855, September 2004, pp. 515–546.Google Scholar
Barrat, Claudie, Status of NGOs in International Humanitarian Law, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, 2014.Google Scholar
Blondel, Jean-Luc, ‘L’assistance aux personnes protégées’, Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge, Vol. 69, No. 767, October 1987, pp. 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean-Luc, ‘The meaning of the word “humanitarian” in relation to the Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 29, No. 273, December 1989, pp. 507–515.Google Scholar
Blondel, Jean-Luc, ‘Genèse et évolution des Principes fondamentaux de la Croix-Rouge et du Croissant-Rouge’, Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge, Vol. 73, No. 790, August 1991, pp. 369–377.Google Scholar
Bouchet-Saulnier, Françoise, ‘Consent to humanitarian access: An obligation triggered by territorial control, not States’ rights’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 96, No. 893, March 2014, pp. 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugnion, François, The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims, ICRC/Macmillan, Oxford, 2003, Book II, Part Two. (2003a)Google Scholar
de Geouffre de La Pradelle, Paul, ‘Une conquête méthodique: le droit d’initiative humanitaire dans les rapports internationaux’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 945–950.Google Scholar
Đjurović, Gradimir, The Central Tracing Agency of the International Committee of the Red Cross: Activities of the ICRC for the Alleviation of the Mental Suffering of War Victims, Henry Dunant Institute, Geneva, 1986.Google Scholar
Fast, Larissa, ‘Unpacking the principle of humanity: Tensions and implications’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 97, Nos 897/898, Spring/Summer 2015, pp. 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, David P., ‘International Humanitarian Assistance: The Role of the Red Cross’, Buffalo Journal of International Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1996–1997, pp. 235–260.Google Scholar
Gentile, Pierre, ‘Humanitarian organizations involved in protection activities: a story of soul-searching and professionalization’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 884, December 2011, pp. 1165–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, ‘The law regulating cross-border relief operations’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 95, No. 890, June 2013, pp. 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harroff-Tavel, Marion, ‘Neutrality and Impartiality – The importance of these principles for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and the difficulties involved in applying them’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 29, No. 273, December 1989, pp. 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.Google Scholar
ICRC, ‘ICRC Q&A and lexicon on humanitarian access’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 96, No. 893, March 2014, pp. 359–375.Google Scholar
ICRC, The Fundamental Principles of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, ICRC, Geneva, August 2015.Google Scholar
ICRC and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, The Fundamental Principles of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement: Ethics and Tools for Humanitarian Action, ICRC, November 2015.Google Scholar
Junod, Sylvie S., ‘Le mandat du CICR durant un conflit armé. Le mandat et les activités du Comité international de la Croix-Rouge’, The Military Law and Law of War Review, Vol. 43, 2004, pp. 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits, ‘Impartiality and Neutrality in Humanitarian Law and Practice’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 29, No. 273, December 1989, pp. 516–535.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, ‘De l’assistance humanitaire: la résolution sur l’assistance humanitaire adoptée par l’Institut de droit international à sa session de Bruges en 2003’, Revue international de la Croix-Rouge, Vol. 86, No. 856, December 2004, pp. 853–878.Google Scholar
Kuijt, Emilie Ellen, Humanitarian Assistance and State Sovereignty in International Law: Towards a Comprehensive Framework, Intersentia, Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Labbé, Jérémie and Daudin, Pascal, ‘Applying the humanitarian principles: Reflecting on the experience of the International Committee of the Red Cross’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 97, Nos 897/898, Spring/Summer 2015, pp. 183–210.Google Scholar
Lattanzi, Flavia, ‘Humanitarian Assistance’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 231–255.Google Scholar
Nishat, Nishat, ‘The Right of Initiative of the ICRC and Other Impartial Humanitarian Bodies’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 495–508.Google Scholar
Oxford Guidance on the Law Relating to Humanitarian Relief Operations in Situations of Armed Conflict, by Akande, Dapo and Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, commissioned & published by UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 2016.Google Scholar
Plattner, Denise, ‘Assistance to the civilian population: the development and present state of international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 32, No. 288, June 1992, pp. 249–263.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, Cédric, ‘Humanitarian Assistance and the Conundrum of Consent: A Legal Perspective’, Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2013, pp. 5–19.Google Scholar
Sandoz, Yves, ‘Le droit d’initiative du Comité international de la Croix-Rouge’, German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 22, 1979, pp. 352–373.Google Scholar
Schwendimann, Felix, ‘The legal framework of humanitarian access in armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 884, December 2011, pp. 993–1008.Google Scholar
Spieker, Heike, ‘Humanitarian Assistance, Access in Armed Conflict and Occupation’, version of March 2013, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, http://www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar
Swinarski, Christophe, ‘La notion d’un organisme neutre et le droit international’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 819–835.Google Scholar
Swiss Confederation, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Humanitarian Access in Situations of Armed Conflict: Practitioners’ Manual, 2014.Google Scholar
Toebes, Brigit, ‘Health and Humanitarian Assistance: Towards an Integrated Norm under International Law’, Tilburg Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2013, pp. 133–151.Google Scholar
Vukas, Budislav, ‘Humanitarian Assistance in Cases of Emergency’, version of March 2013, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, http://www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar
Aïvo, Gérard, ‘Le rôle des accords spéciaux dans la rationalisation des conflits armés non internationaux’, Revue québécoise de droit international, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Bell, Christine, ‘Peace Agreements: Their Nature and Legal Status’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 100, No. 2, 2006, pp. 373–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Christine, On the Law of Peace: Peace Agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria, Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Special Court and International Law: The Decision Concerning the Lomé Agreement Amnesty’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2004, pp. 1130–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre, ‘Are Agreements between States and Non-State Entities Rooted in the International Legal Order?’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Law of Treaties: Beyond the Vienna Convention, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Ewumbue-Monono, Churchill, ‘Respect for international humanitarian law by armed non-state actors in Africa’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 88, No. 864, December 2006, pp. 905–924.Google Scholar
ICRC, The Roots of Behaviour in War: Understanding and Preventing IHL Violations, by Muñoz-Rojas, Daniel and Frésard, Jean-Jacques, ICRC, Geneva, October 2005.Google Scholar
ICRC, Increasing Respect for International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts, ICRC, Geneva, February 2008.Google Scholar
ICRC, ‘A collection of codes of conduct issued by armed groups’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 882, June 2011, pp. 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakovljevic, Bosko, ‘Armed conflict in Yugoslavia: Agreements in the field of international humanitarian law and practice’, Journal of International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1992, pp. 108–111. (1992a)Google Scholar
Jakovljevic, Bosko, ‘The Agreement of May 22, 1992, on the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law in the Armed Conflict in Bosnia-Herzegovina’, Jugoslovenska Revija za Medunarodno Pravo, Nos 2–3, 1992, pp. 212–221. (1992b)Google Scholar
Ramelli Arteaga, Alejandro, Derecho Internacional Humanitario y Estado de Beligerancia, 2nd edition, Externado University of Colombia, Bogotá, 2004, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea and Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Lawmaking by Nonstate Actors: Engaging Armed Groups in the Creation of International Humanitarian Law’, The Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2012, pp. 107–152.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve Their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’, International Humanitarian Legal Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, pp. 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine A. and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War?, Vol. I, 3rd edition, ICRC, Geneva, 2011, pp. 1713–1717.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco and Tougas, Marie-Louise, ‘International Law Issues Raised by the Transfer of Detainees by Canadian Forces in Afghanistan’, McGill Law Journal, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2011, pp. 959–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siordet, Frédéric, ‘Les Conventions de Genève et la guerre civile (suite)’, Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge et Bulletin international des Sociétés de la Croix-Rouge, Vol. 32, No. 375, March 1950, pp. 187–212.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Lessons for the law of armed conflict from commitments of armed groups: identification of legitimate targets and prisoners of war’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 882, June 2011, pp. 463–482.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
van Steenberghe, Raphaël, ‘Théorie des sujets’, in van Steenberghe, Raphaël (ed.), Droit international humanitaire: un régime spécial de droit international ?, Bruylant, Brussels, 2013, pp. 15–71.Google Scholar
Veuthey, Michel, ‘Learning from History: Accession to the Conventions, Special Agreements, and Unilateral Declarations’, in Relevance of International Humanitarian Law to Non-State Actors, Proceedings of the Bruges Colloquium, 25–26 October 2002, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium, No. 27, Spring 2003, pp. 139–151.Google Scholar
Vierucci, Luisa, ‘Special Agreements between Conflicting Parties in the Case-law of the ICTY’, in Swart, Bert, Zahar, Alexander and Sluiter, Göran (eds), The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 401–433.Google Scholar
Vierucci, Luisa, ‘Applicability of the Conventions by Means of Ad Hoc Agreements’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 509–522.Google Scholar
Fleck, Dieter, ‘The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 581–610.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, The Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bellal, Annyssa and Casey-Maslen, Stuart, ‘Enhancing Compliance with International Law by Armed Non-State Actors’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011, pp. 175–197.Google Scholar
Bílková, Veronika, ‘Belligerent reprisals in non-international armed conflicts’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2014, pp. 31–65.Google Scholar
Blewitt, Graham T., ‘The Necessity for Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), Vol. 89, 1995, pp. 298–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Hemptinne, Jérôme, ‘Prohibition of Reprisals’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 575–596.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 173–199.Google Scholar
Draper, Gerald I.A.D., ‘The implementation and enforcement of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and of the Two Additional Protocols of 1978’ (sic), Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, Vol. 164, 1979, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICRC, Increasing Respect for International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts, ICRC, Geneva, February 2008.Google Scholar
ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, Preventing and repressing international crimes: Towards an ‘integrated’ approach based on domestic practice, Report of the Third Universal Meeting of National Committees for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law, prepared by Anne-Marie La Rosa, Vols I–II, ICRC, Geneva, February 2014.Google Scholar
La Haye, Eve, War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts, Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
La Rosa, Anne-Marie and Wuerzner, Carolin, ‘Armed groups, sanctions and the implementation of international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, No. 870, June 2008, pp. 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 89, No. 3, 1995, pp. 554–577.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko and Hadzi-Vidanovic, Vidan, ‘A taxonomy of armed conflict’, in White, Nigel D. and Henderson, Christian (eds), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Just post bellum, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013, pp. 256–314.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, The Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Madeline H., ‘International Guidelines Against Impunity: Facilitating Accountability’, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 59, No. 4, 1996, pp. 29–39.Google Scholar
Perna, Laura, The Formation of the Treaty Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfanner, Toni, ‘Various mechanisms and approaches for implementing international humanitarian law and protecting and assisting war victims’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 874, June 2009, pp. 279–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plattner, Denise, ‘The penal repression of violations of international humanitarian law applicable in non-international armed conflicts’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 30, No. 278, October 1990, pp. 409–420.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve Their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, pp. 5–51.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine A. and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War?, Vol. I, 3rd edition, ICRC, Geneva, 2011.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘The Addressees of Common Article 3’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 415–431.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, ‘Article 25: Individual criminal responsibility’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 979–1029.Google Scholar
Bellal, Annyssa, Giacca, Gilles and Casey-Maslen, Stuart, ‘International law and armed non-state actors in Afghanistan’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 881, March 2011, pp. 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, Michael, ‘The status of captured fighters in non-international armed conflict’, in Tomuschat, Christian, Lagrange, Evelyne and Oeter, Stefan (eds), The Right to Life, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2010, pp. 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Geneva Protocols of 1977 on the Humanitarian law of Armed Conflict and Customary International Law’, UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 3, 1984, pp. 55–118.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, ‘Wilful killing’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 329–331.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘The right to life in armed conflict: does international humanitarian law provide all the answers?’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 88, No. 864, December 2006, pp. 881–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter, ‘The Sixth Annual American Red Cross-Washington College of Law Conference on International Humanitarian Law: A Workshop on Customary International Law and the 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions; Remarks of Hans-Peter Gasser’, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1987, pp. 415–538, at 477–481.Google Scholar
Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, ‘The right to life and the relationship between human rights and humanitarian law’, in Tomuschat, Christian, Lagrange, Evelyne and Oeter, Stefan (eds), The Right to Life, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2010, pp. 121–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Homicide Law in Comparative Perspective, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
ICRC, The Use of Force in Armed Conflicts: Interplay between the Conduct of Hostilities and Law Enforcement Paradigms, Expert Meeting, Report prepared and edited by Gaggioli, Gloria, ICRC, Geneva, 2013.Google Scholar
Knuckey, Sarah, ‘Murder in Common Article 3’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 449–467.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘Application of Humanitarian Law in Non-international Armed Conflicts: Remarks by Theodor Meron’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Vol. 85, 1991, pp. 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary, 2nd revised edition, N.P. Engel, Kehl, 2005.Google Scholar
Ovey, Clare and White, Robin C.A., Jacobs & White: The European Convention on Human Rights, 4th edition, Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Watkin, Kenneth, ‘21st Century Conflict and International Humanitarian Law: Status Quo or Change?’, in Schmitt, Michael N. and Pejic, Jelena (eds), International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2007, pp. 265–296.Google Scholar
Zegveld, Liesbeth, The Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiss, Robin, ‘Mutilations’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 528–568.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Haye, Eve, ‘Mutilation and medical or scientific experiments: Article 8(2)(b)(x)’, in Lee, Roy S. and Friman, Hakan (eds), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 164–167. (2001a)Google Scholar
La Haye, Eve, ‘Violations of Common Article 3’, in Lee, Roy S. and Friman, Hakan (eds), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 207–213. (2001b)Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiss, Robin, ‘Mutilations’, in Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3rd edition, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016, pp. 528–568, at 551.Google Scholar
Bank, Roland, ‘Das Verbot von Folter, unmenschlicher oder erniedrigender Behandlung oder Strafe’, in Grote, Rainer and Marauhn, Thilo (eds), EMRK/GG, Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2006, pp. 479–534.Google Scholar
Burgers, J. Herman and Danelius, Hans, The United Nations Convention against Torture: A Handbook on the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988.Google Scholar
Dewulf, Steven, The Signature of Evil: (Re)Defining Torture in International Law, Intersentia, Antwerp, 2011.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 194–227.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘“In truth the leitmotiv”: the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment in international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Malcolm, ‘Getting to Grips with Torture’, in The Definition of Torture: Proceedings of an Expert Seminar, Association for the Prevention of Torture, Geneva, 2001, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, ‘Challenges to the absolute nature of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2005, pp. 674–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, ‘What Practices Constitute Torture?: US and UN standards’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2006, pp. 809–841.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred and Janik, Ralph R.A., ‘Torture, Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 317–342.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred and McArthur, Elizabeth, The United Nations Convention Against Torture: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Hernán, ‘The worst scars are in the mind: psychological torture’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 591–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S., ‘The definition(s) of torture in international law’, Current Legal Problems, Vol. 55, 2002, pp. 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S., ‘The prohibition of torture: absolute means absolute’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2006, pp. 145–160.Google Scholar
Rodley, Nigel S. and Pollard, Matt, The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Röling, B.V.A. and Rüter, C.F., The Tokyo Judgment: The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (I.M.T.F.E.), 29 April 1946–12 November 1948, 2 volumes, University Press, Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, H. Wayne, ‘Hostages or Prisoners of War: War Crimes at Dinner’, Military Law Review, Vol. 149, 1995, pp. 241–274.Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter and Dörmann, Knut, ‘Protection of the Civilian Population’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 231–320, at paras 508 and 535.Google Scholar
Gucciardo, Dorotea, ‘Hostages’, in Vance, Jonathan F. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Prisoners of War and Internment, 2nd edition, Grey House Publishing, Millerton, New York, 2006, pp. 183–186.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ellen and Salvin, Marina, ‘The Taking of Hostages in Theory and Practice’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1944, pp. 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Irène and Palmieri, Daniel, ‘A haunting figure: The hostage through the ages’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 857, March 2005, pp. 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Arthur K., ‘Editorial Comment: The Execution of Hostages’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, 1942, pp. 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Joseph J., Terrorism and Hostages in International Law: A Commentary on the Hostages Convention 1979, Grotius Publications, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude, ‘La question des otages et les Conventions de Genève’, Revue international de la Croix-Rouge, Vol. 32, No. 378, June 1950, pp. 430–447.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, Robert, ‘International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages: Another International Community Step Against Terrorism’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1980, pp. 169–195.Google Scholar
Salinas Burgos, Hernán, ‘The taking of hostages and international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 29, No. 270, June 1989, pp. 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘War Crimes before the Special Court for Sierra Leone: Child Soldiers, Hostages, Peacekeepers and Collective Punishments’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1009–1034. (2010a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tuck, David, ‘Taking of Hostages’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 297–316.Google Scholar
Wright, Lord, ‘The Killing of Hostages as a War Crime’, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 25, 1948, pp. 296–310.Google Scholar
Barber, Rebecca, ‘Facilitating humanitarian assistance in international humanitarian and human rights law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 874, June 2009, pp. 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, James E., ‘Application of the Law of War to Internal Conflict’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1973, pp. 345–384.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 331–344.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘Judicial Guarantees’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 469–494.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve Their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, pp. 5–51.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Courts of Armed Opposition Groups: Fair Trials or Summary Justice?’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2009, pp. 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Somer, Jonathan, ‘Jungle justice: passing sentence on the equality of belligerents in non-international armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 89, No. 867, September 2007, pp. 655–690.Google Scholar
Willms, Jan, ‘Justice through Armed Groups’ Governance – An Oxymoron?’, SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 40, October 2012.Google Scholar
Bastick, Megan, Grimm, Karin and Kunz, Rahel, Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict: Global Overview and Implications for the Security Sector, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2007.Google Scholar
Brammertz, Serge and Jarvis, Michelle (eds), Prosecuting Conflict-Related Sexual Violence at the ICTY, Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Durham, Helen, ‘International Humanitarian Law and the Protection of Women’, in Durham, Helen and Gurd, Tracey (eds), Listening to the Silences: Women and War, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2005, pp. 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardam, Judith G. and Jarvis, Michelle J., Women, Armed Conflict and International Law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, Medina and Puechguirbal, Nadine, ‘From helplessness to agency: examining the plurality of women’s experiences in armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 92, No. 877, March 2010, pp. 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, ICRC/Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action: Reducing risk, promoting resilience and aiding recovery, 2015.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Charlotte, Women facing war: ICRC Study on the impact of armed conflict on women, ICRC, Geneva, 2001.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Lost in translation: UN responses to sexual violence against men and boys in situations of armed conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 92, No. 877, March 2010, pp. 259–277. (2010b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solangon, Sarah and Patel, Preeti, ‘Sexual violence against men in countries affected by armed conflict’, Journal of Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2012, pp. 417–442.Google Scholar
Viseur Sellers, Patricia, ‘The Context of Sexual Violence: Sexual Violence as Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, in McDonald, Gabrielle Kirk and Swaak-Goldman, Olivia (eds), Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2000, pp. 263–332.Google Scholar
Viseur Sellers, Patricia and Rosenthal, Indira, ‘Rape and Other Sexual Violence’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Marco Sassòli (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 343–368.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, World report on violence and health, Report edited by Krug, Etienne G. et al., WHO, Geneva, 2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization, Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence, WHO, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar
Bellinger III, John B. and Padmanabhan, Vijay M., ‘Detention Operations in Contemporary Conflicts: Four Challenges for the Geneva Conventions and Other Existing Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 105, No. 2, 2011, pp. 201–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Legal Opinion on the December 18, 2005 “Arrangement for the Transfer of Detainees between the Canadian Forces and the Ministry of Defence of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan”’, Liu Institute for Global Issues, 7 April 2006.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘Transfers of detainees: legal framework, non-refoulement and contemporary challenges’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, No. 871, September 2008, pp. 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, ‘There’s no place like home: States’ obligations in relation to transfers of persons’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, No. 871, September 2008, pp. 703–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gisel, Laurent, ‘The principle of non-refoulement in relation to transfers’, in Detention in Armed Conflicts, Proceedings of the 15th Bruges Colloquium, 16–17 October 2014, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium, No. 45, Autumn 2015, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James C., ‘Leveraging Asylum’, Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2010, pp. 503–536.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Jonathan, ‘Transferring Wartime Detainees and a State’s Responsibility to Prevent Torture’, American University National Security Law Brief, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Elihu and Bethlehem, Daniel, ‘The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement: Opinion’, in Feller, Erika, Türk, Volker and Nicholson, Frances (eds), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 87–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2000, pp. 239–278.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Mike, ‘The Syrian Crisis and the Principle of Non-Refoulement’, International Law Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 89, 2013, pp. 776–801.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco and Marie-Louise, Tougas, ‘International Law Issues Raised by the Transfer of Detainees by Canadian Forces in Afghanistan’, McGill Law Journal, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2011, pp. 959–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoglund, Lena, ‘Diplomatic Assurances Against Torture – An Effective Strategy? A Review of Jurisprudence and Examination of the Arguments’, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2008, pp. 319–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×