Akande, Dapo, ‘Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 32–79.

Arimatsu, Louise, ‘Beginning of IHL Application: Overview and Challenges’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 71–82.

Ascencio, Hervé, ‘La responsabilité selon la Cour internationale de Justice dans l'affaire du génocide bosniaque’, Revue générale de droit international public, Vol. 111, No. 2, 2007, pp. 285–304.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, The International Law of Occupation, Princetown University Press, 1993.

Berman, Paul, ‘When Does Violence Cross the Armed Conflict Threshold: Current Dilemmas’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 33–42.

Bothe, Michael, ‘Belligerent Occupation’, Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 4, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 64–66.

Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, pp. 649–668.Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, ‘The Concept of International Armed Conflict’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 3–26.

David, Eric, Principes de droit des conflits armés, 5th edition, Bruylant, Brussels, 2012.

Dinstein, Yoram, ‘Comments on War’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 27, No. 3, Summer 2004, pp. 877–892.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram, The International Law of Belligerent Occupation, Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edition, Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Dörmann, Knut and Colassis, Laurent, ‘International Humanitarian Law in the Iraq Conflict’, German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 47, 2004, pp. 293–342.Google Scholar

Engdahl, Ola, ‘Multinational peace operations forces involved in armed conflict: who are the parties?’, in Larsen, Kjetil Mujezinović, Cooper, Camilla Guldahl and Nystuen, Gro (eds), Searching for a ‘Principle of Humanity’ in International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 233–271.

Ferraro, Tristan, ‘IHL applicability to international organisations involved in peace operations’, in International Organisations’ Involvement in Peace Operations: Applicable Legal Framework and the Issue of Responsibility, Proceedings of the 12th Bruges Colloquium, 20–21 October 2011, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 42, Autumn 2012, pp. 15–22. (2012a)

Ferraro, Tristan, ‘Determining the beginning and end of an occupation under international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 94, No. 885, March 2012, pp. 133–163. (2012b)Google Scholar

Ferraro, Tristan, ‘The applicability and application of international humanitarian law to multinational forces’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 95, No. 891, December 2013, pp. 561–612.Google Scholar

Fleck, Dieter, ‘The Law of Non-international Armed Conflict’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 581–610.

Gasser, Hans-Peter and Dörmann, Knut, ‘Protection of the Civilian Population’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 231–320.

Greenwood, Christopher, ‘The Concept of War in Modern International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2, April 1987, pp. 283–306.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, ‘The Administration of Occupied Territory in International Law’, in Playfair, Emma (ed.), International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992, pp. 241–266.

Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 45–78.

Grignon, Julia, L'applicabilité temporelle du droit international humanitaire, Schulthess, Geneva, 2014.

ICRC, Occupation and Other Forms of Administration of Foreign Territory, Report of expert meeting edited and prepared by Tristan Ferraro, ICRC, Geneva, March 2012.

Kleffner, Jann K., ‘Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 43–78.

Kolb, Robert, Ius in bello : Le droit international des conflits armés, Précis, Helbing and Lichtenhahn, Basel, 2003.

Kolb, Robert, Ius in bello : Le droit international des conflits armés, Précis, 2nd edition, Helbing and Lichtenhahn, Basel, 2009.

Kolb, Robert, Porretto, Gabriele and Vité, Sylvain, L'application du droit international humanitaire et des droits de l'homme aux organisations internationales: Forces de paix et administrations civiles transitoires, Bruylant, Brussels, 2005.

Kolb, Robert and Vité, Sylvain, Le droit de l'occupation militaire : Perspectives historiques et enjeux juridiques actuels, Bruylant, Brussels, 2009.

Koutroulis, Vaios, ‘L'affaire des Activités armées sur le territoire du Congo (Congo c. Ouganda) : une lecture restrictive du droit de l'occupation?’, Revue belge de droit international, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2006, pp. 703–741.Google Scholar

Kritsiotis, Dino, ‘The Tremors of Tadić ’, Israel Law Review, Vol. 43, 2010, pp. 262–300.Google Scholar

Lijnzaad, Liesbeth, ‘How Not to Be an Occupying Power: Some Reflections on UN Security Council Resolution 1483 and the Contemporary Law of Occupation’, in Lijnzaad, Liesbeth, Sambeek, Johanna van and Tahzib-Lie, Bahia (eds), Making the Voice of Humanity Heard, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2004, pp. 291–305.

Lubell, Noam, ‘What does IHL regulate and is the current armed conflict classification adequate?’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 17–24.

Marouda, Maria-Daniella, ‘Application of international humanitarian law in contemporary armed conflicts: Is it ‘simply’ a question of facts?’, in Perrakis, Stelios and Marouda, Maria-Daniella (eds), Armed Conflicts and International Humanitarian Law 150 Years after Solferino: Acquis and Prospects, Bruylant, Brussels, 2009, pp. 201–244.

Milanovic, Marko, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, pp. 553–604.Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-Up’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, pp. 669–694.Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko, ‘End of IHL Application: Overview and challenges’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 83–94.

Milanovic, Marko and Hadzi-Vidanovic, Vidan, ‘A taxonomy of armed conflict’, in White, Nigel D. and Henderson, Christian (eds), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Jus post Bellum, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013, pp. 256–314.

Okimoto, Keiichiro, The Distinction and Relationship between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2011.

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Overlap and Convergence: The Interaction between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2007, pp. 157–196.Google Scholar

Partsch, Karl Josef, ‘Armed conflict’, in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. I, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1992, p. 252.

Roberts, Adam, ‘What Is a Military Occupation?’, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1984, pp. 249–305.Google Scholar

Roberts, Adam, ‘The End of Occupation: Iraq 2004’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 1, January 2005, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar

Sassòli, Marco, ‘Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello, The Separation between the Legality of the Use of Force and Humanitarian Rules to be Respected in Warfare: Crucial or Outdated?’, in Schmitt, Michael N. and Pejic, Jelena (eds), International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2007, pp. 241–264.

Sassòli, Marco, ‘International humanitarian law and peace operations, scope of application ratione materiae’, in Beruto, Gian Luca (ed.), International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights and Peace Operations, Proceedings of the 31st Round Table on Current Problems of International Humanitarian Law, 4–6 September 2008, International Institute of Humanitarian Law, San Remo, 2008, pp. 100–106.

Sassòli, Marco, ‘A plea in defence of Pictet and the inhabitants of territories under invasion: the case for the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention during the invasion phase’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 94, No. 885, March 2012, pp. 42–50.Google Scholar

Sassòli, Marco, ‘The Concept and the Beginning of Occupation’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 1389–1419.

Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War? Vol. I, 3rd edition, ICRC, Geneva, 2011, p. 122.

Schindler, Dietrich, ‘The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols’, Recueil des cours de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye, Vol. 163, 1979, pp. 117–164.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Classification of cyber conflict’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2012, pp. 245–260. (2012a)Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Classification in Future Conflict’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 455–477. (2012b)

Shields Delessert, Christiane, Release and Repatriation of Prisoners of War at the End of Active Hostilities: A Study of Article 118, Paragraph 1 of the 3rd Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag, Zurich, 1977.

Shraga, Daphna, ‘The United Nations as an Actor Bound by International Humanitarian Law’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1998, pp. 64–81.Google Scholar

Shraga, Daphna, ‘The applicability of international humanitarian law to peace operations, from rejection to acceptance’, in Beruto, Gian Luca (ed.), International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights and Peace Operations, Proceedings of the 31st Round Table on Current Problems of International Humanitarian Law, 4–6 September 2008, International Institute of Humanitarian Law, San Remo, 2008, pp. 90–99.

Shraga, Daphna, ‘The Secretary General's Bulletin on the Observance by United Nations Forces of International Humanitarian Law: A Decade Later’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 39, 2009, pp. 357–377.Google Scholar

Talmon, Stefan, ‘The Responsibility of Outside Powers for Acts of Secessionist Entities’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 3, July 2009, pp. 493–517.Google Scholar

Venturini, Gabriella, ‘The Temporal Scope of Application of the Conventions’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 51–66.

Vité, Sylvain, ‘Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: legal concepts and actual situations’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 873, March 2009, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar

Voelckel, Michel, ‘Faut-il encore déclarer la guerre?’, Annuaire français de droit international, Vol. 37, 1991, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar

Zwanenburg, Marten, ‘Is the law of occupation applicable to the invasion phase? Challenging the Pictet theory’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 94, No. 885, March 2012, pp. 30–36. (2012a)Google Scholar

Zwanenburg, Marten, ‘International organisations vs. troops contributing countries: Which should be considered as the party to an armed conflict during peace operations?’, International Organisations’ Involvement in Peace Operations: Applicable Legal Framework and the Issue of Responsibility, Proceedings of the 12th Bruges Colloquium, 20–21 October 2011, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 42, Autumn 2012, pp. 23–28. (2012b)