Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building A New Sourcebook for Rigorous Social Science Researchers
Book contents
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Case Study Research
- Chapter 2 Building Blocks of Case Study Research
- Chapter 3 Of Talking Pigs and Black Swans
- Chapter 4 Do It Again
- Chapter 5 The Natural Experiment, a.k.a. the Single Embedded Design
- Chapter 6 Do It Again (and Again)
- Chapter 7 Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 8 More on Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 9 A Parting Note, on an Optimistic Note
- Index
- References
Chapter 9 - A Parting Note, on an Optimistic Note
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2023
Book contents
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Case Study Research
- Chapter 2 Building Blocks of Case Study Research
- Chapter 3 Of Talking Pigs and Black Swans
- Chapter 4 Do It Again
- Chapter 5 The Natural Experiment, a.k.a. the Single Embedded Design
- Chapter 6 Do It Again (and Again)
- Chapter 7 Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 8 More on Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 9 A Parting Note, on an Optimistic Note
- Index
- References
Summary
The final chapter in this book discusses some methodological considerations and debates surrounding case study research and its quality. In particular, we revisit the topic of research paradigms (i.e. positivism and interpretivism). Relatedly, we discuss different quality criteria as proposed by prior researchers from both paradigmatic camps. In particular, we focus on the rigor versus trustworthiness discussion and the internal versus external validity debate. Afterwards, we briefly discuss the iterative cycles of data collection and analysis one would encounter during a qualitative case study research process. We end the chapter (and subsequently the book) with a guiding framework which will help researchers in sequencing case study designs by acknowledging the weaknesses of individual designs and leveraging their strengths. The framework can be adopted and adapted to suit the specific research objectives of the study in hand.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory BuildingA New Sourcebook for Rigorous Social Science Researchers, pp. 163 - 174Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.Google Scholar
Behling, O. (1980). The case for the natural science model for research in organizational behavior and organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 483–490.Google Scholar
Bluhm, D. J., Harman, W., Lee, T. W. & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Qualitative research in management: A decade of progress. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1866–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonache, J. & Festing, M. (2020). Research paradigms in international human resource management: An epistemological systematisation of the field. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, V. (2009). Empirical business ethics research and paradigm analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W. & Tybout, A. M. (1982). The concept of external validity. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1975). Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2): 178–193.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979a). The design and conduct of true experiments and quasi-experiments in field settings. In Reproduced in part in Research in Organizations: Issues and Controversies. Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979b). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Delbridge, R. & Fiss, P. C. (eds.) (2013). Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 325–331.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
Gephart, R. P. Jr (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection for case‐study analysis: Qualitative and quantitative techniques. In Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Brady, H. E. & Collier, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press, 647–648.Google Scholar
Gibbert, M. & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The “what” and “how” of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 710–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W. & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.Google Scholar
Gross, A. G. (1990). The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.Google Scholar
Kidder, L. & Judd, C. M. (1986). Research Methods in Social Relations, 5th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Kirk, J. & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and expanded from “Case Study Research in Education.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Nair, L. B. (2018). Appraising Scholarly Impact Using Directed Qualitative Content Analysis: A Study of Article Title Attributes in Management Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Nair, L. B. (2021). To discard or to ado(a)pt? Looking at qualitative research templates through the lens of organizational routines. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 16(2), 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, L. B. & Gibbert, M. (2016). Hot on the audit trail: How to assess methodological transparency of grounded theory in management? Academy of Management Annual Meeting. Anaheim, USA, August 2016.Google Scholar
Piekkari, R., Welch, C. & Paavileinen, E. (2009). The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 567–589.Google Scholar