Book contents
- Colonialism, World Literature, and the Making of the Modern Culture of Letters
- Cambridge Studies in World Literature
- Colonialism, World Literature, and the Making of the Modern Culture of Letters
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Formations of the Literary Sovereign
- Part I Epistemic Habits
- Chapter 1 Ethnographic Recension
- Chapter 2 Colonial Untranslatables
- Chapter 3 Comparatism in the Colony
- Part II Aesthetic Conventions
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 1 - Ethnographic Recension
from Part I - Epistemic Habits
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2024
- Colonialism, World Literature, and the Making of the Modern Culture of Letters
- Cambridge Studies in World Literature
- Colonialism, World Literature, and the Making of the Modern Culture of Letters
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Formations of the Literary Sovereign
- Part I Epistemic Habits
- Chapter 1 Ethnographic Recension
- Chapter 2 Colonial Untranslatables
- Chapter 3 Comparatism in the Colony
- Part II Aesthetic Conventions
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In Chapter 1, I explore in detail – through official and personal papers, published translations, letters exchanged between colonial officials, prefaces and commentaries, and so on – how the Company officials, in close collaboration with their local pandits and munshis, produced a tradition of what I call ethnographic recension that anchored an ethnographic world within the very space of a legal or literary text. Coming between the Renaissance humanists such as Politian, Desiderius Erasmus, and Joseph Scaliger on the one hand and nineteenth-century textual scholars such as Karl Lachmann on the other, these colonial administrators introduced a new model of textual authority by combining philology and ethnology that was the first move to mark the newness of colonial knowledge. This ethnographic world was seen as a guarantor of textual authenticity, but its very inclusion set off the dual career of the literary sovereign – its role in defining what is literary, and its participation in political sovereignty.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024