from Part 2 - Management and general treatment approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Summary There are many difficulties associated with the diagnostic guidelines for personality disorder in the current international classificatory systems such as ICD-10 and DSM-IV. These lead not only to significant overlap with DSM Axis I disorders, resulting in high rates of diagnoses of comorbidities and multiple personality disorders, but also to lack of adequate capture of core personality pathology. The current classifications are also unhelpful in treatment selection, presumably the prime reason for assessing individuals in the first place. In this chapter we highlight various deficits and inadequacies related to the nosology of the current systems and suggest some strategies for dealing with these. We offer an integrated model of assessing and diagnosing personality disorders. We attempt to demonstrate how using a more integrated approach minimises or even eliminates some of the key problems highlighted in the current systems.
Criteria for diagnosis of personality disorders have been established in the two international classificatory systems, ICD-10 (World Health Organization, 1992) and DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Both systems are atheoretical, i.e. based not on any causative explanatory paradigm but on expert consensus. Their approach to diagnostic classification has problems that are so serious that, in our experience, many practitioners question the value of making a diagnosis of personality disorder at all.
Given that both ICD-10 and DSM-IV are in the process of revision, we begin with deficiencies of the current systems that have been identified as being especially important. First, the current systems are neither theoretically sound nor empirically validated (Livesley, 2007; Tyrer et al, 2007). Second, they pose problems not only of overlap (an individual might satisfy several personality disorder diagnoses) but also of inadequate capture of important clinical aspects of personality pathology (e.g. passive–aggressive and sadistic traits) (Westen & Arkowitz-Westen, 1998). Furthermore, they are not sufficiently discriminating, so a substantial number of individuals are classified as having a ‘personality disorder not otherwise specified’ (Verheul & Widiger, 2004). Third, clinical assessments of personality disorder have been shown to be very unreliable and self-report inventories have been shown to generate too much psychopathology (Zimmerman, 1994). Although semi-structured instruments show an acceptable level of reliability, their administration is cumbersome and often requires considerable training.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.