Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:10:13.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Biomarkers and the Diagnosis of Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease

from Section 2 - Assessment and Investigations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2020

By
Philippa Lilford  and
Julian C Hughes
Edited by
Julian C. Hughes  and
Philippa Lilford
Julian C. Hughes
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Philippa Lilford
Affiliation:
Severn Deanery, University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

More than 47 million people are living with dementia worldwide, and this number is predicted to increase to 131 million by 2050. Not only can dementia be a devastating condition, it carries a large economic burden with a worldwide cost estimated at US$818 billion. With no cure and an ageing population, the increasing prevalence is a worry.

Biomarkers are naturally occurring markers of the underlying pathological process of a particular disease. Numerous biomarkers to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been developed over the past decade. These have helped to develop the theory that AD is a continuum, which starts with the accumulation of Alzheimer’s pathology years before the emergence of clinical symptoms. The continuum begins with a preclinical phase (Box 12.1), in which there are pathological changes of AD (which can be detected by biomarkers), but no symptoms of dementia. This stage may pre-date AD by decades. It is suggested that this progresses to a prodromal phase of mild symptoms that do not affect daily living. The final stage is established Alzheimer’s dementia. Moving through these stages is not inevitable, and biomarkers have been developed to help predict who will show progression along the continuum.

Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Topics in Old Age Psychiatry , pp. 161 - 172
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Prince, M, Comas-Herrera, A, Knapp, M, Guerchet, M, Karagiannidou, M. World Alzheimer Report 2016: Improving Healthcare for People Living with Dementia. Coverage, Quality and Costs Now and in the Future. Alzheimer’s Disease International, 2016.Google Scholar
Jack, CR Jr, Knopman, DS, Jagust, WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 119–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, B, Feldman, HH, Jacova, C, et al. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 614–29.Google Scholar
Livingston, G, Sommerlad, A, Orgeta, V, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet 2017; 390: 2673–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berti, V, Polio, C, Lombardi, G, Ferrari, C, Sorbi, S, Pupi, A. Rethinking on the concept of biomarkers in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol Sci 2016; 37: 663–72.Google Scholar
Herskovits, Z, Growden, J. Sharpen that needle. Arch Neurol 2010; 67: 918–20.Google Scholar
De Meyer, G, Shapiro, F, Vanderstichele, H, et al. Diagnosis-independent Alzheimer disease biomarker signature in cognitively normal elderly people. Arch Neurol 2010; 67: 949–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, DA, Schneider, JA, Wilson, RS, et al. Neurofibrillary tangles mediate the association of amyloid load with clinic Alzheimer disease and level of cognitive function. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 378–84.Google Scholar
Stern, Y. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 1006–12.Google Scholar
Sperling, RA, Aisen, PS, Beckett, LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 280–92.Google Scholar
Nakamura, A, Kaneko, N, Villemagne, VL, et al. High performance plasma amyloid-β biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 2018; 554: 249–54.Google Scholar
Preische, O, Schultz, S, et al. Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med 2019; 25: 277–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, D, Sweeney, M, Montagne, A, et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat Med 2019; 25: 270–276.Google Scholar
Tapiola, T, Alafuzoff, I, Herukka, SK, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid β-amyloid 42 and tau proteins as biomarkers of Alzheimer-type pathologic changes in the brain. Arch Neurol 2009; 66: 382–89.Google Scholar
Bacskai, B, Frosch, J, Freeman, M, et al. Molecular imaging with Pittsburgh Compound B confirmed at autopsy: a case report. Arch Neurol 2007; 64: 431–4.Google Scholar
Fagan, A, Mintum, M, Mach, R, et al. Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 in humans. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 512–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, JC, Storandt, M, McKeel, DW Jr, et al. Cerebral amyloid deposition and diffuse plaques in ‘normal’ aging: evidence for presymptomatic and very mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1996; 46: 707–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, J, Li, Q, He, Z, et al. The eye as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci 2016; 10: 536.Google Scholar
Hardy, J, Selkoe, DJ The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 2002; 297: 353–6.Google Scholar
Klein, WL, Stine, WB Jr, Teplow DB Small assemblies of unmodified amyloid beta protein are the proximate neurotoxin in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2004; 25: 569–80.Google Scholar
Hansson, O, Zetterberg, H, Buchhave, P, et al. Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 228–34.Google Scholar
Parnetti, L, Lanari, A, Silvestrelli, G, Saggese, E, Reboldi, P. Diagnosing prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: role of CSF biochemical markers. Mech Ageing Dev 2006; 127: 129–32.Google Scholar
Mattsson, N, Zetterberg, H, Hansson, O, et al. CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. JAMA 2009; 302: 385–93.Google Scholar
Visser, PJ, Verhey, F, Knol, D, et al. Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 619–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chetelat, G, Villemagne, VL, Pike, K, et al. Independent contribution of temporal beta-amyloid deposition to memory decline in the pre-dementia phase of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2011; 134: 798–807.Google Scholar
Snider, BJ, Fagan, AM, Roe, C, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and rate of cognitive decline in very mild dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol 2009; 66: 638–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Souza, LC, Lamari, F, Belliard, S, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease from other cortical dementias. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82: 240–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Rossum, IA, Vos, S, Handels, R, et al. Biomarkers as predictors for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer-type dementia: implications for trial design. J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 20: 881–91.Google Scholar
Fagan, AM, Roe, CM, Xiong, C, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid tau/β-amyloid42 ratio as a prediction of cognitive decline in nondemented older adults. Arch Neurol 2007; 64: 343–9.Google Scholar
Li, G, Sokal, I, Quinn, JF, et al. CSF tau/Abeta42 ratio for increased risk of mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Neurology 2007; 69: 631–9.Google Scholar
Villemagne, VL, Pike, KE, Darby, D, et al. Aß deposits in older non-demented individuals with cognitive decline are indicative of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 1688–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, JC, Roe, CM, Grant, EA, et al. Pittsburgh Compound B imaging and prediction of progression from cognitive normality to symptomatic Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2009; 66: 1469–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storandt, M, Mintun, MA, Head, D, et al. Cognitive decline and brain volume loss as signatures of cerebral amyloid-beta peptide deposition identified with Pittsburgh compound B: cognitive decline associated with Abeta deposition. Arch Neurol 2009; 66: 1476–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, SM, Sojkova, J, Zhou, Y, et al. Longitudinal cognitive decline is associated with fibrillar amyloid-beta measured by [11C]PiB. Neurology 2010; 74: 807–15.Google Scholar
Vemuri, P, Wiste, HJ, Weigand, SD, et al. MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects: predicting future clinical change. Neurology 2009; 73: 294–301.Google Scholar
Yaffe, K, Weston, A, Graff-Radford, NR, et al. Association of plasma beta-amyloid level and cognitive reserve with subsequent cognitive decline. JAMA 2011; 305: 261–6.Google Scholar
Koopman, K, Le Bastard, N, Martin, JJ, et al. Improved discrimination of autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease from non-AD dementias using CSF P-tau. Neurochem Int 2009; 55: 214–8.Google Scholar
Dubois, B, Feldman, H, Jacova, C, et al. Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 734–46.Google Scholar
Shivamurthy, V, Tahari, A, Marcus, C, et al. Brain FDG PET and the diagnosis of dementia. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 204: 76–85.Google Scholar
McKhann, G, Drachman, D, Folstein, M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984; 34: 939–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, CR Jr, Albert, MS, Knopman, DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 257–62.Google Scholar
Dubois, B, Albert, ML. Amnestic MCI or prodromal Alzheimer’s disease? Lancet Neurol 2004; 3: 246–8.Google Scholar
Watkin, A, Sikdar, S, Majurndar, B, et al. New diagnostic concepts in Alzheimer’s disease. BJPsych Adv 2013; 19: 242–9.Google Scholar
Mattsson, N, Andreasson, U, Persson, S, et al. CSF biomarker variability in the Alzheimer’s Association quality control program. Alzheimers Dement 2013; 9: 251–61.Google Scholar
Harkins, K, Sankar, P, Sperling, R, et al. Development of a process to disclose amyloid imaging results to cognitively normal older adult research participants. Alzheimers Res Ther 2015; 7: 26.Google Scholar
Hughes, JC, Ingram, TA, Jarvis, A, Denton, E, Lampshire, Z, Wernham, C. Consent for the diagnosis of preclinical dementia states: a review. Maturitas 2017; 98: 30–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, R, Roberts, J, Cupples, L, et al. Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 245–54.Google Scholar
Estes, CL, Binney, EA. The biomedicalization of aging: dangers and dilemmas. Gerontologist 1989; 29: 587–96.Google Scholar
Wilson, JMG, Jungner, G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease (Public Health Papers 34). World Health Organization, 1968.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×