Lloyd-Jones, D, Adams, R, Carnethon, M, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2009 update: report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009;119.

Volmink, J, Newton, J, Hicks, N, et al. Coronary event and case fatality rates in an English population: results of the Oxford myocardial infarction incidence study. The Oxford Myocardial Infarction Incidence Study Group. Heart 1998;80:40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savonitto, S, Ardissino, D, Granger, C, et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 1999;281:707–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hachamovitch, R, Rozanski, A, Shaw, L, et al. Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1012–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwitter, J.Future strategies in the management of coronary artery disease. Fut Cardiol 2006;2(5):555–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kwong, RY, Chan, AK, Brown, KA, et al. Impact of unrecognized myocardial scar detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on event-free survival in patients presenting with signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2006;113(23):2733–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allman, K, Shaw, L, Hachamovitch, R, Udelson, J.Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1151–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beanlands, RS, Ruddy, TD, deKemp, RA, et al. Positron emission tomography and recovery following revascularization (PARR-1): the importance of scar and the development of a prediction rule for the degree of recovery of left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40(10):1735–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonow, RO, Maurer, G, Lee, KL, et al. Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2011;364(17):1617–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wagner, A, Mahrholdt, H, Holly, TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361(9355):374–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Iskander, S, Iskandrian, AE.Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32(1):57–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jahnke, C, Nagel, E, Gebker, R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007;115:1769–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Steel, K, Broderick, R, Gandla, V, et al. Complementary prognostic values of stress myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Circulation 2009;120:1390–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hundley, WG, Morgan, TM, Neagle, CM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging determination of cardiac prognosis. Circulation 2002;106(18):2328–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffman, JIE, Spaan, JAE.Pressure-flow relations in coronary circulation. Physiol Rev 1990;70:331–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mosher, P, Ross, JJ, McFate, P, Shaw, R.Control of coronary blood flow by an autoregulatory mechanism. Circ Res 1964;14:250–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwitter, J, DeMarco, T, Kneifel, S, et al. Magnetic resonance-based assessment of global coronary flow and flow reserve and its relation to left ventricular functional parameters: a comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2000;101(23):2696–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tomanek, R, Palmer, P, Pfeiffer, G, et al. Morphometry of canine coronary arteries, arterioles and capillaries during hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. Circ Res 1986;58:38–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Uren, N, Melin, J, De Bruyne, B, et al. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1782–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Picano, E, Parodi, O, Lattanzi, F, et al. Assessment of anatomic and physiological severity of single-vessel coronary artery lesions by dipyridamole echocardiography. Comparison with positron emission tomography and quantitative arteriography. Circulation 1994;89:753–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Di Carli, MF, Czernin, J, Hoh, C, et al. Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1995;91:1944–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sambuceti, G, Parodi, O, Marcassa, C, et al. Alterations in regulation of myocardial blood flow in one-vessel coronary artery disease determined by positron emission tomography. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:538–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwitter, J, Nanz, D, Kneifel, S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103(18):2230–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bertschinger, KM, Nanz, D, Buechi, M, et al. Magnetic resonance myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging: parameter optimization for signal response and cardiac coverage. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14(5):556–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giang, T, Nanz, D, Coulden, R, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multicenter experience. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1657–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwitter, J, Wacker, C, van Rossum, A, et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2008;29:480–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plein, S, Kozerke, S, Suerder, D, et al. High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2148–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwitter, J. CMR Update, 2nd edn. Lausanne: Schwitter, J. 2012; Available from (accessed November 19, 2012).

Schwitter, J, Arai, A.Imaging: assessment of cardiac ischaemia and viability: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 2011;32:799–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruder, O, Schneider, S, Nothnagel, D, et al. EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1457–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwitter, J, Wacker, CM, Wilke, N, et al. Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: the secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial). J. Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, E, Klein, C, Paetsch, I, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108(4):432–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plein, S, Radjenovic, A, Ridgway, JP, et al. Coronary artery disease: myocardial perfusion MR imaging with sensitivity encoding versus conventional angiography. Radiology 2005;235(2):423–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Paetsch, I, Jahnke, C, Wahl, A, et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 2004;110(7):835–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kwong, R, Schussheim, A, Rekhraj, S, et al. Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2003;107:531–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ingkanisorn, WP, Kwong, RY, Bohme, NS, et al. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(7):1427–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plein, S, Greenwood, J, Ridgeway, J, et al. Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2173–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffmann, U, Globits, S, Schima, W, et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac and paracardiac masses. Am J Cardiol 2003;92(7):890–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schuler, P, Weber, A, Bode, P, et al. MRI of intimal sarcoma of the pulmonary arteries. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:e37–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fussen, S, De Boeck, BWL, Zellweger, MJ, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and clinical management of suspected cardiac masses and tumours. Eur Heart J 2011;32(12):1551–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Srichai, MB, Junor, C, Rodriguez, LL, et al. Clinical, imaging, and pathological characteristics of left ventricular thrombus: a comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography with surgical or pathological validation. Am Heart J 2006;152(1):75–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knuesel, PR, Nanz, D, Wyss, C, et al. Characterization of dysfunctional myocardium by positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance: relation to functional outcome after revascularization. Circulation 2003;108(9):1095–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christian, TF, Rettmann, DW, Aletras, AH, et al. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232(3):677–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gatehouse, PD, Elkington, AG, Ablitt, NA, et al. Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high-dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20(1):39–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Biological effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR) reports VII-Phase 2. National Research Council. Available from: (accessed November 19, 2012).

Eisenberg, M, Afilalo, J, Lawler, P, et al. Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction. CMAJ 2011;183:430–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cardis, E, Vrijheid, M, Blettner, M, et al. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. Br Med J 2005;331:77–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buechel, ER, Balmer, C, Bauersfeld, U, Kellenberger, CJ, Schwitter, J.Feasibility of perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in paediatric patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11:51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burke, A, Kolodgie, F, Farb, A, et al. Healed plaque ruptures and sudden coronary death: evidence that subclinical rupture has a role in plaque progression. Circulation 2001;103:934–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwitter, J, Oelhafen, M, Wyss, BM, et al. 2D-spatially-selective real-time magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of microvascular function and its relation to the cardiovascular risk profile. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8(5):759–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwitter, J, Kozerke, S, Bremerich, J, et al. Oral administration of 17beta-estradiol over 3 months without progestin co-administration does not improve coronary flow reserve in post-menopausal women: a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over CMR study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:665–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenvuo, J, Hartiala, J, Knuuti, J, et al. Assessing coronary sinus blood flow in patients with coronary artery diseaseAJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1161–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kawada, N, Sakuma, H, Yamakado, T, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: MR measurement of coronary blood flow and vasodilator flow reserve in patients and healthy subjects. Radiology 1999;211:129–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hays, A, Hirsch, G, Kelle, S, et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery endothelial function in healthy subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1657–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Niemi, P, Poncelet, BP, Kwong, KK, et al. Myocardial intensity changes associated with flow stimulation in blood oxygenation sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:78–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fieno, DS, Shea, SM, Li, Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging based on the blood oxygen level-dependent effect using T2-prepared steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2004;110:1284–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wright, K, Klocke, F, Deshpande, V, et al. Assessment of regional differences in myocardial blood flow using T2-weighted 3D BOLD imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:573–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reeder, S, Atalay, M, McVeigh, E, Zerhouni, E, Forder, J.Quantitative cardiac perfusion: a noninvasive spin-labeling method that exploits coronary vessel geometry. Radiology 1996;200:177–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Belle, V, Kahler, E, Waller, C, et al. In vivo quantitative mapping of cardiac perfusion in rats using a noninvasive MR spin-labeling method. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1240–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCommis, KS, Zhang, H, Herrero, P, Grapler, RJ, Zheng, J.Feasibility study of myocardial perfusion and oxygenation by noncontrast MRI: comparison with PET study in a canine model. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golman, K, Ardenkjaer-Larsen, JH, Petersson, JS, Mansson, S, Leunbach, I.Molecular imaging with endogenous substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100(18):10435–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwitter, J.Myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13(6):841–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwitter, J.Extending the frontiers of cardiac magnetic resonance. Circulation 2008;118:109–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wahl, A, Paetsch, I, Gollesch, A, et al. Safety and feasibility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecutive cases. Eur Heart J 2004;25(14):1230–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hundley, WG, Hamilton, CA, Thomas, MS, et al. Utility of fast cine magnetic resonance imaging and display for the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients not well suited for second harmonic stress echocardiography. Circulation 1999;100(16):1697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkoff, BL, Bello, D, Taborsky, M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Heart Rhythm 2011;8(1):65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Syed, MA, Carlson, K, Murphy, M.Long-term safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed in the first few days after bare-metal stent implantation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24(5):1056–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kellman, P, Derbyshire, J, Agyeman, K, McVeigh, E, Arai, A.Extended coverage first-pass perfusion imaging using slice-interleaved TSENSE. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:200–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zaret, BL, Rigo, P, Wackers, FJ, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc tetrofosmin. Comparison to 201TI imaging and coronary angiography in a phase III multicenter trial. Tetrofosmin International Trial Study Group. Circulation 1995;91:313–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Train, KF, Garcia, EV, Maddahi, J, et al. Multicenter trial validation for quantitative analysis of same-day, rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial tomograms. J Nucl Med 1994;35:609–18.Google ScholarPubMed

Hendel, RC, Berman, DS, Cullon, SJ, et al. Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 1999;99:2742–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed