Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:43:19.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

133 - Enterococcus

from Part XVIII - Specific Organisms – Bacteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Ronald N. Jones
Affiliation:
JMI Laboratories
David Schlossberg
Affiliation:
Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Since the early 1970s, the enterococci have steadily emerged as major hospital-acquired (nosocomial) pathogens. In statistics from the National Nosocomial Infectious Surveillance System (NNISS), they are the second most common gram-positive cause of nosocomial bloodstream infection and the third most common cause of nosocomial wound infections. In fact, enterococci rank first among gram-positive cocci in producing urinary tract infections (17.4%, see Table 133.1). The significant increases in occurence of this genus since the early to mid-1970s is related to patterns of general antimicrobial use in the hospital and in particular to widespread use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins, β-lactamase inhibitor/penicillin combinations, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, and aminoglycosides and the emergence of resistances in the genus.

Cephalosporins are not active or bactericidal against enterococci, and they may therefore result in a selective advantage for this genus. Fluoroquinolones are also only modestly active against these species. Enterococcus faecalis produce most human enterococcal infections (70% to 80%), and Enterococcus faecium accounts for most (10% to 16%) of the remainder. Antimicrobial resistance is a particular problem among E. faecium isolates. Other species of interest are Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum, not because of the frequency with which they are isolated, but because of the intrinsic low-level resistance to vancomycin (eg, the vanC genotype and resultant generally intermediate phenotype; minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs], 4–8 μg/mL).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×