Critchley, LA, Stuart, JC, Short, TG, Gin, T. Haemodynamic effects of subarachnoid block in elderly patients. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73: 464–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennis, AT. Transthoracic echocardiography in women with preeclampsia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015; 28: 254–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coe, AJ, Revanas, B. Is crystalloid preloading useful in spinal anaesthesia in the elderly? Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 241–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baraka, A, Taha, S, Ghabach, M, et al. Hypertonic saline prehydration in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72: 227–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kamenik, M, Paver-Erzen, V. The effects of lactated Ringer's solution infusion on cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 710–14.Google Scholar

Svensen, CH, Rodhe, PM, Prough, DS. Pharmacokinetic aspects of fluid therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009; 23: 213–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hahn, RG, Svensen, C. Plasma dilution and the rate of infusion of Ringer's solution. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 64–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dyer, RA, Farina, Z, Joubert, IA, et al. Crystalloid preload versus rapid crystalloid administration after induction of spinal anaesthesia (coload) for elective caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 32: 351–7.Google Scholar

Critchley, LA. Hypotension, subarachnoid block and the elderly patient. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1139–43.Google Scholar

Drobin, D, Hahn, RG. Time course of increased haemodilution in hypotension induced by extradural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 223–6.Google Scholar

Zorko, N, Kamenik, M, Starc, V. The effect of Trendelenburg position, lactated Ringer's solution and 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution on cardiac output after spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 655–9.Google Scholar

Levy, BF, Scott, MJ, Fawcett, WJ, Day, A, Rockall, TA. Optimizing patient outcomes in laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13(Suppl 7): 8–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levy, BF, Fawcett, WJ, Scott, MJ, Rockall, TA. Intra-operative oxygen delivery in infusion volume-optimized patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery program: the effect of different analgesic modalities. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 887–92.Google Scholar

Moppett, IK, Rowlands, M, Mannings, A, et al. LiDCO-based fluid management in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial and systematic review. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 444–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shin, BS, Kim, CS, Sim, WS, et al. A comparison of the effects of preanesthetic administration of crystalloid versus colloid on intrathecal spread of isobaric spinal anesthetics and cerebrospinal fluid movement. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 924–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rout, CC, Akoojee, SS, Rocke, DA, Gouws, E. Rapid administration of crystalloid preload does not decrease the incidence of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 394–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rout, CC, Rocke, DA, Levin, J, Gouws, E, Reddy, D. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 262–9.Google Scholar

Jackson, R, Reid, JA, Thorburn, J. Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 262–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karinen, J, Rasanen, J, Alahuhta, S, Jouppila, R, Jouppila, P. Maternal and uteroplacental haemodynamic state in pre-eclamptic patients during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 616–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chanimov, M, Gershfeld, S, Cohen, ML, Sherman, D, Bahar, M. Fluid preload before spinal anaesthesia in Caesarean section: the effect on neonatal acid–base status. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23: 676–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marciniak, A, Wujtewicz, M, Owczuk, R. The impact of colloid infusion prior to spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section on the condition of a newborn – a comparison of balanced and unbalanced hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2013; 45: 14–19.Google Scholar

Pouta, AM, Karinen, J, Vuolteenaho, OJ, Laatikainen, TJ. Effect of intravenous fluid preload on vasoactive peptide secretion during Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 128–32.Google Scholar

Pouta, A, Karinen, J, Vuolteenaho, O, Laatikainen, T. Pre-eclampsia: the effect of intravenous fluid preload on atrial natriuretic peptide secretion during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 1203–9.Google Scholar

Faydaci, F, Gunaydin, B. Different preloading protocols with constant ephedrine infusion in the prevention of hypotension for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2011; 62: 5–10.Google Scholar

Banerjee, A, Stocche, RM, Angle, P, Halpern, SH. Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57: 24–31.Google Scholar

Hahn, RG. Volume kinetics for infusion fluids. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 470–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Siddik-Sayyid, SM, Nasr, VG, Taha, SK, et al. A randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 1219–24.Google Scholar

Ueyama, H, He, YL, Tanigami, H, Mashimo, T, Yoshiya, I. Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section [see comments]. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1571–6.Google Scholar

Riley, ET, Cohen, SE, Rubenstein, AJ, Flanagan, B. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: six percent hetastarch versus lactated Ringer's solution. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 838–42.Google Scholar

Buggy, D, Higgins, P, Moran, C, et al. Prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in the elderly: comparison between preanesthetic administration of crystalloids, colloids, and no prehydration. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 106–10.Google Scholar

Buggy, D, Fitzpatrick, G. Intravascular volume optimisation during repair of proximal femoral fracture. Regional anaesthesia is usually technique of choice. BMJ 1998; 316: 1090.Google ScholarPubMed

Ngan, Kee WD, Khaw, KS, Lee, BB, Ng, FF, Wong, MM. Randomized controlled study of colloid preload before spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 772–4.Google Scholar

Morgan, PJ, Halpern, SH, Tarshis, J. The effects of an increase of central blood volume before spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a qualitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 997–1005.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, G, Granath, F, Pregner, K, et al. Colloid vs. crystalloid preloading to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 1200–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dahlgren, G, Granath, F, Wessel, H, Irestedt, L. Prediction of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section and its relation to the effect of crystalloid or colloid preload. Int J Obstet Anesth 2007; 16: 128–34.Google Scholar

Davies, P, French, GW. A randomised trial comparing 5 mL/kg and 10 mL/kg of pentastarch as a volume preload before spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 279–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vercauteren, MP, Hoffmann, V, Coppejans, HC, Van Steenberge, AL, Adriaensen, HA. Hydroxyethylstarch compared with modified gelatin as volume preload before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 731–3.Google Scholar

Cyna, AM, Andrew, M, Emmett, RS, Middleton, P, Simmons, SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006: CD002251.Google Scholar

McDonald, S, Fernando, R, Ashpole, K, Columb, M. Maternal cardiac output changes after crystalloid or colloid coload following spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 803–10.Google Scholar

Li, L, Zhang, Y, Tan, Y, Xu, S. Colloid or crystalloid solution on maternal and neonatal hemodynamics for Cesarean section: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39: 932–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mercier, FJ, Diemunsch, P, Ducloy-Bouthors, AS, et al. 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) vs. Ringer's lactate preloading before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: the randomized, double-blind, multicentre CAESAR trial. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113: 459–67.Google Scholar

Mitra, JK, Roy, J, Bhattacharyya, P, Yunus, M, Lyngdoh, NM. Changing trends in the management of hypotension following spinal anesthesia in Cesarean section. J Postgrad Med 2013; 59: 121–6.Google Scholar

Sharwood-Smith, G, Drummond, GB. Hypotension in obstetric spinal anaesthesia: a lesson from pre-eclampsia. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 291–4.Google Scholar

Dyer, RA, Reed, AR, van Dyk, D, et al. Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine, phenylephrine, and the coadministration of phenylephrine with oxytocin during spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 753–65.Google Scholar

Ngan, Kee WD. Phenylephrine infusions for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery: finding the shoe that fits. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 496–8.Google Scholar

Jakobsson, J. Day Case Anaesthesia. Oxford, UK: Oxford Library Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Warner, MA, Shields, SE, Chute, CG. Major morbidity and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia. JAMA 1993; 270: 1437–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mezei, G, Chung, F. Return hospital visits and hospital readmissions after ambulatory surgery. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 721–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Engbaek, J, Bartholdy, J, Hjortsø, NC. Return hospital visits and morbidity within 60 days after day surgery: a retrospective study of 18,736 day surgical procedures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 911–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, F, Mezei, G, Tong, D. Adverse events in ambulatory surgery. A comparison between elderly and younger patients. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 309–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Søreide, E, Eriksson, LI, Hirlekar, G, et al. Pre-operative fasting guidelines: an update. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 1041–7.Google Scholar

Brady, M, Kinn, S, Stuart, P. Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003: CD004423.Google ScholarPubMed

Brady, M, Kinn, S, Ness, V, et al. Preoperative fasting for preventing perioperative complications in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009: CD005285.Google Scholar

Maltby, JR, Pytka, S, Watson, NC, Cowan, RA, Fick, GH. Drinking 300 mL of clear fluid two hours before surgery has no effect on gastric fluid volume and pH in fasting and non-fasting obese patients. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 111–15.Google Scholar

Cook-Sather, SD, Gallagher, PR, Kruge, LE, et al. Overweight/obesity and gastric fluid characteristics in pediatric day surgery: implications for fasting guidelines and pulmonary aspiration risk. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 727–36.Google Scholar

Meisner, M, Ernhofer, U, Schmidt, J. Liberalisation of preoperative fasting guidelines: effects on patient comfort and clinical practicability during elective laparoscopic surgery of the lower abdomen. Zentralbl Chir 2008; 133: 479–85.Google Scholar

Chung, F, Yuan, H, Yin, L, Vairavanathan, S, Wong, DT. Elimination of preoperative testing in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 467–75.Google Scholar

Nygren, J, Soop, M, Thorell, A, Sree, Nair K, Ljungqvist, O. Preoperative oral carbohydrates and postoperative insulin resistance. Clin Nutr 1999; 18: 117–20.Google Scholar

Ljungqvist, O. Modulating postoperative insulin resistance by preoperative carbohydrate loading. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009; 23: 401–9.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Klarskov, B, Christensen, DS, et al. Liberal versus restrictive fluid administration to improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind study. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 892–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dagher, CF, Abboud, B, Richa, F, et al. Effect of intravenous crystalloid infusion on postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 188–91.Google Scholar

Apfel, CC, Meyer, A, Orhan-Sungur, M, et al. Supplemental intravenous crystalloids for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: quantitative review. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 893–902.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Jensen, P, Kehlet, H. Physiologic effects of intravenous fluid administration in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1504–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Chaudhary, S, Sethi, AK, Motiani, P, Adatia, C. Pre-operative intravenous fluid therapy with crystalloids or colloids on postoperative nausea & vomiting. Indian J Med Res 2008; 127: 577–81.Google ScholarPubMed

McCaul, C, Moran, C, O'Cronin, D, et al. Intravenous fluid loading with or without supplementary dextrose does not prevent nausea, vomiting and pain after laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 440–4.Google Scholar

Dabu-Bondoc, S, Vadivelu, N, Shimono, C, et al. Intravenous dextrose administration reduces postoperative antiemetic rescue treatment requirements and postanesthesia care unit length of stay. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 591–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Patel, P, Meineke, MN, Rasmussen, T, et al. The relationship of intravenous dextrose administration during emergence from anesthesia to postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 34–4.Google Scholar

Ead, H. From Aldrete to PADSS: reviewing discharge criteria after ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs 2006; 21: 259–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sivasankaran, MV, Pam, T, Divino, CM. Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 2014; 207: 288–92.Google Scholar

Antonescu, I, Baldini, G, Watson, D, et al. Impact of a bladder scan protocol on discharge efficiency within a care pathway for ambulatory inguinal herniorraphy. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4711–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nossaman, VE, Richardson, WS 3rd, Wooldridge, JB Jr, Nossaman, BD. Role of intraoperative fluids on hospital length of stay in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study in 224 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 2014; 29: 2960–9.Google Scholar

Matot, I, Paskaleva, R, Eid, L, et al. Effect of the volume of fluids administered on intraoperative oliguria in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 228–34.Google Scholar

Nelson, G, Kalogera, E, Dowdy, SC. Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 135: 586–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yogendran, S, Asokumar, B, Cheng, DC, Chung, F. A prospective randomized double-blinded study of the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on adverse outcomes on outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 682–6.Google Scholar

Elhakim, M, el-Sebiae, S, Kaschef, N, Essawi, GH. Intravenous fluid and postoperative nausea and vomiting after day-case termination of pregnancy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 216–19.Google Scholar

Bennett, J, McDonald, T, Lieblich, S, Piecuch, J. Perioperative rehydration in ambulatory anesthesia for dentoalveolar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 279–84.Google Scholar

Ali, SZ, Taguchi, A, Holtmann, B, Kurz, A. Effect of supplemental pre-operative fluid on postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 780–4.Google Scholar

Magner, JJ, McCaul, C, Carton, E, Gardiner, J, Buggy, D. Effect of intraoperative intravenous crystalloid infusion on postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynaecological laparoscopy: comparison of 30 and 10 ml/kg. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 381–5.Google Scholar

Maharaj, CH, Kallam, SR, Malik, A, et al. Preoperative intravenous fluid therapy decreases postoperative nausea and pain in high risk patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 675–82.Google Scholar

Chohedri, AH, Matin, M, Khosravi, A. The impact of operative fluids on the prevention of postoperative anesthetic complications in ambulatory surgery – high dose vs. low dose. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2006; 18: 1147–56.Google Scholar

Goodarzi, M, Matar, MM, Shafa, M, Townsend, JE, Gonzalez, I. A prospective randomized blinded study of the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in children undergoing strabismus surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2006; 16: 49–53.Google Scholar

Lambert, KG, Wakim, JH, Lambert, NE. Preoperative fluid bolus and reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. AANA J 2009; 77: 110–14.Google ScholarPubMed

Brandstrup, B, Tønnesen, H, Beier-Holgersen, R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens. A randomized assessor blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 641–8.Google Scholar

de Aguilar-Nascimento, JE, Diniz, BN, do Carmo, AV, Silveira, EA, Silva, RM. Clinical benefits after the implementation of a protocol of restricted perioperative intravenous crystalloid fluids in major abdominal operations. World J Surg 2009; 33: 925–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kulemann, B, Timme, S, Seifert, G, et al. Intraoperative crystalloid overload leads to substantial inflammatory infiltration of intestinal anastomosis – a histomorphological analysis. Surgery 2013; 154: 596–603.Google Scholar

Lobo, DN, Bostock, KA, Neal, KR, et al. Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 1812–18.Google Scholar

Marjanovic, G, Villain, C, Juettner, E, et al. Impact of different crystalloid volume fluid regimens on intestinal anastomotic stability. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 181–5.Google Scholar

McArdle, GT, McAuley, DF, McKinley, A, et al. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of restrictive versus standard fluid regime in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 28–34.Google Scholar

Neal, JM, Wilcox, RT, Allen, HW, Low, DE. Near-total esophagectomy: the influence of standardized multimodal management and intraoperative fluid restriction. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 328–334.Google Scholar

Nisanevich, V, Felsenstein, I, Almogy, G, et al. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intra-abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 25–32.Google Scholar

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2564–75.Google Scholar

Wuethrich, PY, Burchard, FC, Thalmann, GN, Stueber, F, Studer, UE. Restrictive deferred hydration combined with preemptive norepinephrine infusion during radical cystectomy reduces postoperative complications and hospitalization time: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 365–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Varadhan, KK, Lobo, DN. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc 2010; 69: 488–98.Google Scholar

Preoperative faste for vokse of barn; retningslinie fra European Society of Anaesthesiology. www.dasaim.dk May 23, 2014.Google Scholar

Henriksen, MG. Effects of preoperative oral carbohydrates and peptides on postoperative endocrine response, mobilization, nutrition and muscle function in abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 191–9.Google Scholar

Ljungqvist, O, Thorell, A, Gutniak, M, et al. Glucose infusion instead of preoperative fasting reduces postoperative insulin resistance. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178: 329–36.Google ScholarPubMed

Nygren, J, Soop, M, Thorell, A, Sree Nair, K, Ljungqvist, O. Preoperative oral carbohydrates and postoperative insulin resistance. Clin Nutr 1999; 18: 117–20.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Foss, NB, Andersen, J, et al. Liberal versus restrictive fluid management in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 500–8.Google Scholar

Lamke, LO, Nielsson, GE, Reithner, HL. Water loss by evaporation from the abdominal cavity during surgery. Acta Chir Scand 1977; 143: 279–84.Google Scholar

Roe, CF. Effect of bowel exposure on body temperature during surgical operations. Am J Surg 1971; 122: 13–15.Google Scholar

Brandstrup, B, Svendsen, C, Engquist, A. Hemorrhage and operation cause a contraction of the extracellular space needing replacement – evidence and implications? A systematic review. Surgery 2006; 139: 419–32.Google Scholar

Chan, STF, Kapadia, CR, Johnson, AW, Radcliffe, AG, Dudley, HAF. Extracellular fluid volume expansion and third space sequestration at the site of small bowel anastomoses. Br J Surg 1983; 70: 36–9.Google Scholar

Brandstrup, B. Restricted intravenous fluid therapy in colorectal surgery, results of a clinical randomised multi centre trial. 2003. Unpublished thesis/ dissertation, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Jacob, M, Chappel, D, Rehm, M. The third space – fact or fiction? Best Prac Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009; 23: 145–57.Google Scholar

Kinsella, SM, Pirlet, M, Mills, MS, Tuckey, JP, Thomas, TA. Randomized study of intravenous fluid preload before epidural analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 311–13.Google Scholar

Kubli, M, Shennan, AH, Seed, PT, O'Sullivan, G. A randomised controlled trial of fluid pre-loading before low dose epidural analgesia for labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003; 12: 256–60.Google Scholar

Nishimura, N, Kajimoto, Y, Kabe, T, Sakamoto, A. The effect of volume loading during epidural analgesia. Resuscitation 1985; 13: 31–9.Google Scholar

Navarro, LH, Bloomstone, JA, Auler, JO Jr, et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group. Perioper Med (Lond) 2015; 4: 1–20.Google Scholar

Perner, A, Haase, N, Guttormsen, AB, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 124–34.Google Scholar

Gan, TJ, Mythen, MG, Glass, PS. Intraoperative gut hypoperfusion may be a risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holte, K, Klarskov, B, Christensen, DS, et al. Liberal versus restrictive fluid administration to improve recovery after laparoscopic cholesystectomy. A randomized, double-blind study. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 892–9.Google Scholar

Tulstrup, J, Brandstrup, B. Clinical assessment of fluid balance is incomplete for colorectal surgical patients. Scand J Surg 2015; 104: 161–8.Google Scholar

Vermeulen, H, Hofland, J, Legemate, DA, Ubbink, DT. Intravenous fluid restriction after major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded clinical trial. Trials 2009; 7: 10–50.Google Scholar

MacCay, G, Fearon, K, McConnachie, A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1469–74.Google Scholar

Conway, DH, Mayall, R, Abdul-Latif, MS, Gilligan, S, Tackaberry, C. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 845–9.Google Scholar

Gan, TJ, Soppitt, A, Maroof, M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 820–6.Google Scholar

Wakeling, HG, McFall, MR, Jenkins, CS, et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 634–42.Google Scholar

Noblett, SE, Snowden, CP, Shenton, BK, Horgan, AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1069–76.Google Scholar

Lopes, MR, Oliveira, MA, Pereira, VO, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11: R100.Google Scholar

Buettner, M, Schummer, W, Huettemann, E, et al. Influence of systolic-pressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 194–9.Google Scholar

Forget, P, Lois, F, de Kock, M. Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 910–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayer, J, Boldt, J, Mengistu, AM, Röhm, KD, Suttner, S. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010; 14: 1–9.Google Scholar

Benes, J, Chytra, I, Altmann, P, et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2010; 14: 1–15.Google Scholar

Challand, C, Struthers, R, Sneyd, JR, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 53–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Salzwedel, C, Puig, J, Carstens, A, et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study. Crit Care 2013; 17: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zheng, H, Guo, H, Ye, J, Chen, L, Ma, H. Goal-directed fluid therapy in gastrointestinal surgery in older coronary heart disease patients: randomized trial. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2820–9.Google Scholar

Brandstrup, B, Svendsen, PE, Rasmussen, M, et al. Which goal for fluid therapy during colorectal surgery is followed by the best outcome: near maximal stroke volume or zero fluid balance? A clinical randomized double blinded multi centre trial. Eur J Anaesth 2010; 27: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, J, Qiao, H, He, Z, et al. Intraoperative fluid management in open gastrointestinal surgery: goal-directed versus restrictive. Clinics 2012; 67: 1149–55.Google Scholar

Srinivasa, S, Taylor, MH, Singh, PP, et al. Randomized clinical trial of goal-directed fluid therapy within an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colectomy. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 66–74.Google Scholar

Phan, TD, D'Sousa, B, Rattray, MJ, Johnston, MJ, Cowie, BS. A randomised controlled trial of fluid restriction compared to oesophageal Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Anaesth Intensive Care 2014; 42: 752–60.Google Scholar

Keane, PW, Murray, PF. Intravenous fluids in minor surgery. Their effect on recovery from anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1986; 41: 635–7.Google Scholar

Spencer, EM. Intravenous fluids in minor gynaecological surgery. Their effect on postoperative morbidity. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 1050–1.Google Scholar

Cook, R, Anderson, S, Riseborough, M, Blogg, CE. Intravenous fluid load and recovery. A double-blind comparison in gynaecological patients who had day-case laparoscopy. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 826–30.Google Scholar

Yogendran, S, Asokumar, B, Cheng, DC, Chung, F. A prospective randomized double-blinded study of the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on adverse outcomes on outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 682–6.Google Scholar

McCaul, C, Moran, C, O'Cronin, D, et al. Intravenous fluid loading with or without supplementary dextrose does not prevent nausea, vomiting and pain after laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2003; 5: 440–4.Google Scholar

Magner, JJ, McCaul, C, Carton, E, Gardiner, J, Buggy, D. Effect of intraoperative intravenous crystalloid infusion on postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynaecological laparoscopy: comparison of 30 and 10 ml/kg. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 381–5.Google Scholar

Mariscalco, G, Musumeci, F. Fluid management in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit: diuresis–diuretics and hemofiltration. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2014; 27: 133–9.Google Scholar

Jakob, SM, Ruokonen, E, Takala, J. Assessment of the adequacy of systemic and regional perfusion after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 571–7.Google Scholar

Habicher, M, Perrino, A, Spies, CD, et al. Contemporary fluid management in cardiac anesthesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25: 1141–53.Google Scholar

Assaad, S, Popescu, W, Perrino, A. Fluid management in thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013; 26: 31–9.Google Scholar

Grocott, MPW, Mythen, MG, Gan, TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1093–106.Google Scholar

Jacob, M, Bruegger, D, Rehm, M, et al. Contrasting effects of colloid and crystalloid resuscitation fluids on cardiac vascular permeability. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 1223–31.Google Scholar

Bruegger, D, Jacob, M, Rehm, M, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide induces shedding of endothelial glycocalyx in coronary vascular bed of guinea pig hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005; 289: H1993–9.Google Scholar

Rehm, M, Bruegger, D, Christ, F, et al. Shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx in patients undergoing major vascular surgery with global and regional ischemia. Circulation 2007; 116: 1896–906.Google Scholar

Bruegger, D, Schwartz, L, Chappell, D, et al. Release of atrial natriuretic peptide precedes shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx equally in patients undergoing on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 106: 1111–21.Google Scholar

Chappell, D, Hofmann-Kiefer, K, Jacob, M, et al. TNF-alpha induced shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx is prevented by hydrocortisone and antithrombin. Basic Res Cardiol 2009; 104: 78–89.Google Scholar

Berg, S, Engman, A, Hesselvik, JF Laurent, TC. Crystalloid infusion increases plasma hyaluronan. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 1563–7.Google Scholar

Ueda, S, Nishio, K, Akai, Y, et al. Prognostic value of increased plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with septic shock. Shock 2006; 26: 134–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bark, BP, Persson, J, Grande, PO. Importance of the infusion rate for the plasma expanding effect of 5% albumin, 6% HES 130/0.4, 4% gelatin, and 0.9% NaCl in the septic rat. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 857–66.Google Scholar

Rehberg, S, Yamamoto, Y, Sousse, L, et al. Selective V(1a) agonism attenuates vascular dysfunction and fluid accumulation in ovine severe sepsis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012; 303: H1245–54.Google Scholar

Woodcock, TE, Woodcock, TM. Revised Starling equation and the glycocalyx model of transvascular fluid exchange: an improved paradigm for prescribing intravenous fluid therapy. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 384–94.Google Scholar

Levick, JR, Michel, CC. Microvascular fluid exchange and the revised Starling principle. Cardiovasc Res 2010; 87: 198–210.Google Scholar

Nicholson, JP, Wolmarans, MR, Park, GR. The role of albumin in critical illness. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 599–610.Google Scholar

Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, Boyce, N, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2247–56.Google Scholar

Maitland, K, Kiguli, S, Opoka, RO, et al. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2483–95.Google Scholar

Caironi, P, Tognoni, G, Masson, S, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1412–21.Google Scholar

van Rijen, EA, Ward, JJ, Little, RA. Effects of colloidal resuscitation fluids on reticuloendothelial function and resistance to infection after hemorrhage. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1998; 5: 543–9.Google Scholar

Schramko, A, Suojaranta-Ylinen, R, Kuitunen, A, et al. Hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin solutions impair blood coagulation after cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 691–7.Google Scholar

Nielsen, VG. Hydroxyethyl starch enhances fibrinolysis in human plasma by diminishing alpha2-antiplasmin-plasmin interactions. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2007; 18: 647–56.Google Scholar

Ertmer, C, Rehberg, S, van Aken, H, Westphal, M. Relevance of non-albumin colloids in intensive care medicine. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009; 23: 193–212.Google Scholar

Ljungstrom, KG. Safety of dextran in relation to other colloids-ten years experience with hapten inhibition. Infusionsther Transfusionsmed 1993; 20: 206–10.Google Scholar

Guidet, B, Soni, N, Della Rocca, G, et al. A balanced view of balanced solutions. Crit Care 2010; 14: 325.Google Scholar

de Felippe, J, Timoner, J, Velasco, IT, Lopes, OU, Rocha-e-Silva, M. Treatment of refractory hypovolaemic shock by 7.5% sodium chloride injections. Lancet 1980; 2: 1002–4.Google Scholar

Strandvik, GF. Hypertonic saline in critical care: a review of the literature and guidelines for use in hypotensive states and raised intracranial pressure. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 990–1003.Google Scholar

Tisherman, SA, Schmicker, RH, Brase, KJ, et al. Detailed description of all deaths in both the shock and traumatic brain injury hypertonic saline trials of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 586–90.Google Scholar

Smorenberg, A, Ince, C, Groeneveld, AJ. Dose and type of crystalloid fluid therapy in adult hospitalized patients. Perioper Med (Lond) 2013; 2: 17.Google Scholar

Myburgh, JA, Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1901–11.Google Scholar

Perner, A, Haase, N, Guttormsen, AB, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 124–34.Google Scholar

James, MF, Michell, WL, Joubert, IA, et al. Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial (Fluids in Resuscitation of Severe Trauma). Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 693–702.Google Scholar

Siegemend, M. BaSES trial: Basel Starch Evaluation in Sepsis. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier. NCT00273728 2013.Google Scholar

Annane, D, Siami, S, Jaber, S, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs. crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1809–17.Google Scholar

O'Malley, CM, Frumento, RJ, Hardy, MA, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer's solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1518–24.Google Scholar

Waters, JH, Gottlieb, A, Schoenwald, P, et al. Normal saline versus lactated Ringer's solution for intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an outcome study. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 817–22.Google Scholar

Meybohm, P, van Aken, H, De Gasperi, A, et al. Re-evaluating currently available data and suggestions for planning randomised controlled studies regarding the use of hydroxyethyl starch in critically ill patients – a multidisciplinary statement. Crit Care 2013; 17: R166.Google Scholar

Ghijselings, I, Rex, S. Hydroxyethyl starches in the perioperative period. A review on the efficacy and safety of starch solutions. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2014; 65: 9–22.Google Scholar

Teixeira, C, Garzotto, F, Piccinni, P, et al. Fluid balance and urine volume are independent predictors of mortality in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2013; 17: R14.Google Scholar

Qureshi, SH, Rizvi, SI, Patel, NN, Murphy, GJ. Meta-analysis of colloids versus crystalloids in critically ill, trauma and surgical patients. Br J Surg 2016; 103: 14–26. doi: 10.1002/bjs. 9943.Google Scholar

Friis-Hansen, B. Body water compartments in children: changes during growth and related changes in body composition. Pediatrics 1961; 28: 169–81.Google Scholar

Bissonnette, B. Pediatric Anesthesia. Shelton: People's Medical Publishing House-USA, 2011.Google Scholar

Bhananker, SM, Ramamoorthy, C, Geiduschek, JM, et al. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: update from the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest Registry. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 344–50.Google Scholar

Nichols, D, Ungerleider, R, Spevak, P. Critical Heart Disease in Infants and Children. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2006.Google Scholar

Engelhardt, T, Wilson, G, Horne, L, et al. Are you hungry? Are you thirsty? Fasting times in elective outpatient pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2011; 21: 964–8.Google Scholar

Dennhardt, N, Beck, C, Huber, D, et al. Preoperative fasting times and ketone bodies in children under 36 months of age. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32: 857–61.Google Scholar

Andersson, H, Zaren, B, Frykholm, P. Low incidence of pulmonary aspiration in children allowed intake of clear fluids until called to the operating suite. Paediatr Anaesth 2015; 25: 770–7.Google Scholar

Radke, OC, Biedler, A, Kolodzie, K, et al. The effect of postoperative fasting on vomiting in children and their assessment of pain. Paediatr Anaesth 2009; 19: 494–9.Google Scholar

Holliday, MA, Segar, WE. The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid therapy. Pediatrics 1957; 19: 823–32.Google Scholar

Duke, T, Molyneux, EM. Intravenous fluids for seriously ill children: time to reconsider. Lancet 2003; 362: 1320–3.Google Scholar

Moritz, ML, Ayus, JC. Hospital-acquired hyponatremia: why are there still deaths? Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1395–6.Google Scholar

Fraser, CL, Arieff, AI. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of hyponatremic encephalopathy. Am J Med 1997; 102: 67–77.Google Scholar

Arieff, AI. Postoperative hyponatraemic encephalopathy following elective surgery in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1998; 8: 1–4.Google Scholar

Ayus, JC, Achinger, SG, Arieff, A. Brain cell volume regulation in hyponatremia: role of sex, age, vasopressin, and hypoxia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2008; 295: F619–24.Google Scholar

Sieber, FE, Traystman, RJ. Special issues: glucose and the brain. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 104–14.Google Scholar

Welborn, LG, McGill, WA, Hannallah, RS, et al. Perioperative blood glucose concentrations in pediatric outpatients. Anesthesiology 1986; 65: 543–7.Google Scholar

Bailey, AG, McNaull, PP, Jooste, E, et al. Perioperative crystalloid and colloid fluid management in children: where are we and how did we get here? Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 375–90.Google Scholar

Nishina, K, Mikawa, K, Maekawa, N, Asano, M, Obara, H. Effects of exogenous intravenous glucose on plasma glucose and lipid homeostasis in anesthetized infants. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 258–63.Google Scholar

Mikawa, K, Maekawa, N, Goto, R, et al. Effects of exogenous intravenous glucose on plasma glucose and lipid homeostasis in anesthetized children. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 1017–22.Google Scholar

Dubois, MC, Gouyet, L, Murat, I, Saint-Maurice, C. Lactated Ringer with 1% dextrose: an appropriate solution for peri-operative fluid therapy in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1992; 2: 99–104.Google Scholar

Berleur, MP, Dahan, A, Murat, I, Hazebroucq, G. Perioperative infusions in paediatric patients: rationale for using Ringer-lactate solution with low dextrose concentration. J Clin Pharm Ther 2003; 28: 31–40.Google Scholar

Sümpelmann, R, Becke, K, Crean, P, et al. European consensus statement for intraoperative fluid therapy in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 637–9.Google Scholar

Sümpelmann, R, Mader, T, Eich, C, et al. A novel isotonic-balanced electrolyte solution with 1% glucose for intraoperative fluid therapy in children: results of a prospective multicentre observational post-authorization safety study (PASS). Paediatr Anaesth 2010; 20: 977–81.Google Scholar

McNab, S, Duke, T, South, M, et al. 140 mmol/L of sodium versus 77 mmol/L of sodium in maintenance intravenous fluid therapy for children in hospital (PIMS): a randomised controlled double-blind trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 1190–7.Google Scholar

Foster, BA, Tom, D, Hill, V. Hypotonic versus isotonic fluids in hospitalized children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2014; 165: 163–9.Google Scholar

Zander, R. Fluid Management. Melsungen: Bibliomed, 2009.Google Scholar

Witt, L, Osthaus, WA, Bunte, C, et al. A novel isotonic-balanced electrolyte solution with 1% glucose for perioperative fluid management in children – an animal experimental preauthorization study. Paediatr Anaesth 2010; 20: 734–40.Google Scholar

Disma, N, Mameli, L, Pistorio, A, et al. A novel balanced isotonic sodium solution vs. normal saline during major surgery in children up to 36 months: a multicenter RCT. Paediatr Anaesth 2015; 24: 980–6.Google Scholar

Arikan, AA, Zappitelli, M, Goldstein, SL, et al. Fluid overload is associated with impaired oxygenation and morbidity in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011; 13: 253–8.Google Scholar

Saudan, S. Is the use of colloids for fluid replacement harmless in children? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010; 23: 363–7.Google Scholar

Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative Trial Group. Randomised trial of prophylactic early fresh-frozen plasma or gelatin or glucose in preterm babies: outcome at 2 years. Lancet 1996; 348: 229–32.Google Scholar

Westphal, M, James, MF, Kozek-Langenecker, S, et al. Hydroxyethyl starches: different products–different effects. Anesthesiology 2009; 11: 187–202.Google Scholar

Osthaus, WA, Witt, L, Johanning, K, et al. Equal effects of gelatin and hydroxyethyl starch (6% HES 130/0.42) on modified thrombelastography in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 305–10.Google Scholar

Witt, L, Osthaus, WA, Jahn, W, et al. Isovolaemic hemodilution with gelatin and hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.42: effects on hemostasis in piglets. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22: 379–85.Google Scholar

Sümpelmann, R, Kretz, FJ, Luntzer, R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42/6:1 for perioperative plasma volume replacement in 1130 children: results of an European prospective multicenter observational postauthorization safety study (PASS). Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22: 371–8.Google Scholar

van der Linden, P, Dumoulin, M, Van Lerberghe, C, et al. Efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Voluven) for perioperative volume replacement in children undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity-matched analysis. Crit Care 2015; 19: 87.Google Scholar

Witt, L, Glage, S, Schulz, K, et al. Impact of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 and 4% gelatin on renal function in a pediatric animal model. Paediatr Anaesth 2014; 24: 974–9.Google Scholar

Chappell, D, Jacob, M, Hofmann-Kiefer, K, Conzen, P, Rehm, M. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 723–40.Google Scholar

Osthaus, WA, Huber, D, Beck, C, et al. Correlation of oxygen delivery with central venous oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure and heart rate in piglets. Paediatr Anaesth 2006; 16: 944–7.Google Scholar

Sümpelmann, R, Mader, T, Dennhardt, N, et al. A novel isotonic balanced electrolyte solution with 1% glucose for intraoperative fluid therapy in neonates: results of a prospective multicentre observational postauthorisation safety study (PASS). Paediatr Anaesth 2011; 21: 1114–18.Google Scholar

Holte, K. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of peroperative fluid management in elective surgery. Dan Med Bull 2010; 57: B4156.Google Scholar

Doherty, M, Buggy, DJ. Intraoperative fluids: how much is too much? Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 69–79.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Sharrock, NE, Kehlet, H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 622–32.Google Scholar

Navarro, LH, Bloomstone, JA, Auler, JO Jr, et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the perioperative fluid optimization group. Perioper Med (Lond) 2015; 4: 3.Google Scholar

Bundgaard-Nielsen, M, Holte, K, Secher, NH, et al. Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 331–40.Google Scholar

Corcoran, T, Rhodes, JE, Clarke, S, et al. Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2012; 104: 640–51.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Kehlet, H. Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: a need for reassessment in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 971–89.Google Scholar

Kehlet, H, Wilmore, DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 189–98.Google Scholar

Masoomi, H, Kang, CY, Chen, A, et al. Predictive factors of in-hospital mortality in colon and rectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 255–61.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Jensen, P, Kehlet, H. Physiologic effects of intravenous fluid administration in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1504–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Holte, K, Nielsen, KG, Madsen, JL, et al. Physiologic effects of bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1397–402.Google Scholar

Moghadamyeghaneh, Z, Phelan, MJ, Carmichael, JC, et al. Preoperative dehydration increases risk of postoperative acute renal failure in colon and rectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18: 2178–85.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Foss, NB, Andersen, J, et al. Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 500–8.Google Scholar

Wenkui, Y, Ning, L, Jianfeng, G, et al. Restricted peri-operative fluid administration adjusted by serum lactate level improved outcome after major elective surgery for gastrointestinal malignancy. Surgery 2010; 147: 542–52.Google Scholar

Brandstrup, B, Tonnesen, H, Beier-Holgersen, R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 641–8.Google Scholar

Bundgaard-Nielsen, M, Jans, Ø, Müller, RG, et al. Does goal-directed fluid therapy affect postoperative orthostatic intolerance? A randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 813–23.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Kristensen, BB, Valentiner, L, et al. Liberal versus restrictive fluid management in knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 465–74.Google Scholar

Brammar, A, Nicholson, A, Trivella, M, et al. Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; CD003004.Google Scholar

Burdett, E, Dushianthan, A, Benett-Guerrero, , et al. Perioperative buffered versus non-buffered fluid administration for surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; CD004089.Google Scholar

Hofmeyr, G, Cyna, A, Middleton, P. Prophylactic intravenous preloading for regional analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD000175.Google Scholar

Cyna, AM, Andrew, M, Emmett, RS, et al. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD002251.Google Scholar

Mercier, FJ, Diemunsch, P, Ducloy-Bouthors, AS, et al. 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) vs. Ringer's lactate preloading before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: The randomized, double-blind, multicentre CAESAR trial. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113: 459–67.Google Scholar

Evans, RG, Naidu, B. Does a conservative fluid management strategy in the perioperative management of lung resection patients reduce the risk of acute lung injury? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15: 498–504.Google Scholar

Chau, EH, Slinger, P. Perioperative fluid management for pulmonary resection surgery and esophagectomy. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014; 18: 36–44.Google Scholar

Mueller, AR, Platz, KP, Krause, P, et al. Perioperative factors influencing patient outcome after liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2013; 13 Suppl 1: S158–61.Google Scholar

Gruenberger, T, Steininger, R, Sautner, T, et al. Influence of donor criteria on postoperative graft function after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl Int 1994; 7 Suppl 1: S672–4.Google Scholar

Blok, JJ, Putter, H, Rogiers, X, et al. Eurotransplant Liver Intestine Advisory Committee (ELIAC). Combined effect of donor and recipient risk on outcome after liver transplantation: Research of the Eurotransplant database. Liver Transpl 2015; 21: 1486–93. doi:10.1002/lt.24308.Google Scholar

Schiefer, J, Lebherz-Eichinger, D, Erdoes, G, et al. Alterations of endothelial glycocalyx during orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with end-stage liver disease. Transplantation 2015; 99: 2118–23.Google Scholar

Bukowicka, B, Akar, RA, Olszewska, A, et al. The occurrence of postreperfusion syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation and its significance in terms of complications and short-term survival. Ann Transplant 2011; 16: 26–30.Google Scholar

Paugam-Burtz, C, Kavafyan, J, Merckx, P, et al. Postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation for cirrhosis: outcome and predictors. Liver Transpl 2009; 15: 522–9.Google Scholar

Sabate, A, Dalmau, A, Koo, M, et al. Coagulopathy management in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 1523–5.Google Scholar

Porte, RJ. Coagulation and fibrinolysis in orthotopic liver transplantation: current views and insights. Semin Thromb Hemost 1993; 19: 191–6.Google Scholar

Massicotte, L, Lenis, S, Thibeault, L, et al. Effect of low central venous pressure and phlebotomy on blood product transfusion requirements during liver transplantations. Liver Transpl 2006; 12: 117–23.Google Scholar

Sirivatanauksorn, Y, Parakonthun, T, Premasathian, N, et al. Renal dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2014; 46: 818–21.Google Scholar

Yalavarthy, R, Edelstein, CL, Teitelbaum, I. Acute renal failure and chronic kidney disease following liver transplantation. Hemodial Int 2007; 11 Suppl 3: S7–12.Google Scholar

Tinti, F, Umbro, I, Giannelli, V, et al. Acute renal failure in liver transplant recipients: role of pretransplantation renal function and 1-year follow-up. Transplant Proc 2011; 43: 1136–8.Google Scholar

Scheingraber, S, Rehm, M, Sehmisch, C, Finsterer, U. Rapid saline infusion produces hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1265–70.Google Scholar

Waters, JH, Miller, LR, Clack, S, Kim, JV. Cause of metabolic acidosis in prolonged surgery. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2142–6.Google Scholar

Prough, DS, Bidani, A. Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis is a predictable consequence of intraoperative infusion of 0.9% saline. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1247–9.Google Scholar

Morgan, TJ. The ideal crystalloid – what is ‘balanced’? Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 4: 299–307.Google Scholar

Morgan, TJ, Venkatesh, B. Designing ‘balanced’ crystalloids. Crit Care Resusc 2003; 5: 284–91.Google Scholar

Omron, EM. Omron RM. A physicochemical model of crystalloid infusion on acid–base status. J Intensive Care Med 2010; 25: 271–80.Google Scholar

Zander, R. Fluid Management. 2nd edn. http://www.bbraun.com/documents/Knowledge/Fluid_Management_0110.pdf (accessed 14 April 2015).Google Scholar

Watanabe, I, Mayumi, T, Arishima, T, et al. Hyperlactaemia can predict the prognosis after liver resection. Shock 2007; 28: 35–8.Google Scholar

Jansen, TC, van Bommel, J, Bakker, J. Blood lactate monitoring in critically ill patients: a systematic health technology assessment. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2827–39.Google Scholar

Kveim, M, Nesbakken, R, Bakker, J, et al. Serial blood lactate levels can predict the development of multiple organ failure following septic shock. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 221–6.Google Scholar

Nakatani, T. Utilization of exogenous acetate during canine haemorrhagic shock. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1979; 39: 653–8.Google Scholar

Mudge, GH, Manning, JA, Gilman, A. Sodium acetate as a source of fixed base. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1949; 71: 136–8.Google Scholar

Hamada, T, Yamamoto, M, Nakamura, K, et al. The pharmacokinetics of D-lactate, L-lactate and acetate in humans. Masui 1997; 46: 229–36.Google Scholar

McCague, A, Dermendjieva, M, Hutchinson, R, Wong, DT, Dao, N. Sodium acetate infusion in critically ill trauma patients for hyperchloremic acidosis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011; 19: 24.Google Scholar

Skutches, CL, Holroyde, CP, Myers, RN, et al. Plasma acetate turnover and oxidation. J Clin Invest 1979; 64: 708–13.Google Scholar

Akanji, AO, Bruce, MA, Frayn, KN. Effect of acetate infusion on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation rates in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 1989; 43: 107–15.Google Scholar

Akanji, AO, Hockaday, TDR. Acetate tolerance and the kinetics of acetate utilization in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 51: 112–18.Google Scholar

Thomas, DJ, Alberti, KG. Hyperglycaemic effects of Hartmann's solution during surgery in patients with maturity onset diabetes. Br J Anaesth 1978; 50: 185–8.Google Scholar

Arai, K, Mukaida, K, Fujioka, Y, et al. A comparative study of acetated Ringer's solution and lactated Ringer's solution as intraoperative fluids. Hiroshima J Anesth 1989; 25: 357–63.Google Scholar

Naylor, JM, Forsyth, GW. The alkalinizing effects of metabolizable bases in the healthy calf. Can J Vet Res 1986; 50: 509–16.Google Scholar

Kirkendol, PL, Starrs, J, Gonzalez, FM. The effect of acetate, lactate, succinate and gluconate on plasma pH and electrolytes in dogs. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1980; 26: 323–7.Google Scholar

Coll, E, Perez-Garcia, R, Rodriguez-Benitez, P, et al. Clinical and analytical changes in hemodialysis without acetate. Nefrologia 2007; 27: 742–8.Google Scholar

Bottger, I, Deuticke, U, Evertz-Prusse, E, Ross, BD, Wieland, O. On the behavior of the free acetate in the miniature pig. Acetate metabolism in the miniature pig. Z Gesamte Exp Med 1968; 145: 346–52.Google Scholar

Fournier, G, Potier, J, Thebaud, HE, et al. Substitution of acetic acid for hydrochloric acid in the bicarbonate buffered dialysate. Artif Organs 1998; 22: 608–13.Google Scholar

Kirkendol, NW, Gonzalez, FM, Devia, CJ. Cardiac and vascular effects of infused sodium acetate in dogs. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1978; 24: 714–18.Google Scholar

Thaha, M, Yogiantoro, M, Soewanto, P. Correlation between intradialytic hypotension in patients undergoing routine hemodialysis and use of acetate compared in bicarbonate dialysate. Acta Med Indones 2005; 37: 145–8.Google Scholar

Veech, RL, Gitomer, WL. The medical and metabolic consequences of administration of sodium acetate. Adv Enzyme Regul 1988; 27: 313–43.Google Scholar

Quebbeman, EJ, Maierhofer, WJ, Piering, WF. Mechanisms producing hypoxemia during hemodialysis. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 359–63.Google Scholar

Selby, NM, Fluck, RJ, Taal, MW, McIntyre, CW. Effects of acetate-free double-chamber hemodiafiltration and standard dialysis on systemic hemodynamics and troponin T levels. ASAIO J 2006; 52: 62–9.Google Scholar

Jacob, AD, Elkins, N, Reiss, OK, Chan, L, Shapiro, JI. Effects of acetate on energy metabolism and function in the isolated perfused rat heart. Kidney Int 1997; 52: 755–60.Google Scholar

Nitenberg, A, Huyghebaert, MF, Blanchet, F, Amiel, C. Analysis of increased myocardial contractility during sodium acetate infusion in humans. Kidney Int 1984; 26: 744–51.Google Scholar

McCluskey, SA, Karkouti, K, Wijeysundera, D, et al. Hyperchloremia after noncardiac surgery is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality: a propensity-matched cohort study. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 412–21.Google Scholar

Yunos, NM, Bellomo, R, Hegarty, C, et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs. chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA 2012; 308: 1566–72.Google Scholar

Krajewski, ML, Raghunathan, K, Paluszkiewicz, SM, Schermer, CR, Shaw, AD. Meta-analysis of high- versus low-chloride content in perioperative and critical care fluid resuscitation. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 24–36.Google Scholar

Wilcox, CS. Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest 1983; 71: 726–35.Google Scholar

Salomonsson, M, Gonzalez, E, Kornfeld, M, Persson, AE. The cytosolic chloride concentration in macula densa and cortical thick ascending limb cells. Acta Physiol Scand 1993; 147: 305–13.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, S, Kawata, T, Schnermann, J, Koike, T. Chloride channel blockade attenuates the effect of angiotensin II on tubuloglomerular feedback in WKY but not spontaneously hypertensive rats. Kidney Blood Press Res 2004; 27: 35–42.Google Scholar

Bullivant, EM, Wilcox, CS, Welch, WJ. Intrarenal vasoconstriction during hyperchloremia: role of thromboxane. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: F152–7.Google Scholar

Zhou, F, Peng, ZY, Bishop, JV, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with 0.9% saline versus a balanced electrolyte solution on acute kidney injury in a rat model of sepsis. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: e270–8.Google Scholar

Guidet, B, Soni, N, Della Rocca, G, et al. A balanced view of balanced solutions. Crit Care 2010; 14: 325.Google Scholar

McCloughlin, PD, Bell, DA. Hartmann's Solution – osmolality and lactate. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 1135–6.Google Scholar

Schumann, R, Mandell, S, Michaels, MD, Klinck, J, Walia, A. Intraoperative fluid and pharmacologic management and the anesthesiologist's supervisory role for nontraditional technologies during liver transplantation: a survey of US academic centers. Transplant Proc 2013; 45: 2258–62.Google Scholar

Mukhtar, A, Aboulfetouh, F, Obayah, G, et al. The safety of modern hydroxyethyl starch in living donor liver transplantation: a comparison with human albumin. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 924–30.Google Scholar

Zhou, ZB, Shao, XX, Yang, XY, et al. Influence of hydroxyethyl starch on renal function after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2015; 47: 1616–19.Google Scholar

Hand, WR, Whiteley, JR, Epperson, TI, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch and acute kidney injury in orthotopic liver transplantation: a single-center retrospective review. Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 619–26.Google Scholar

Bagshaw, SM, Chawla, LS. Hydroxyethyl starch for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 709–13.Google Scholar

Haase, N, Perner, A. Hydroxyethyl starch for resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19: 321–5.Google Scholar

Myburgh, JA, Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1901–11.Google Scholar

Perner, A, Haase, N, Guttormsen, AB, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 124–34.Google Scholar

Haase, N, Perner, A, Hennings, LI, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38–0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ 2013; 346: 839.Google Scholar

Zarychanski, R, Abou-Setta, AM, Turgeon, AF, et al. Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2013; 309: 678–88.Google Scholar

Perel, P, Roberts, I, Ker, K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 28: CD000567.Google Scholar

Ma, PL, Peng, XX, Du, B, et al. Sources of heterogeneity in trials reporting hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or 0.42 associated excess mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-regression. Chin Med J 2015; 128: 2374–82.Google Scholar

Dart, AB, Mutter, TC, Ruth, CA, Taback, SP. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 20: CD007594.Google Scholar

Mutter, TC, Ruth, CA, Dart, AB. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7: CD007594.Google Scholar

Niemi, TT, Suojaranta-Ylinen, RT, Kukkonen, SI, Kuitunen, AH. Gelatin and hydroxyethyl starch, but not albumin, impair hemostasis after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 998–1006.Google Scholar

Konrad, C, Markl, T, Schuepfer, G, Gerber, H, Tschopp, M. The effects of in vitro hemodilution with gelatin, hydroxyethyl starch, and lactated Ringer's solution on markers of coagulation: an analysis using SONOCLOT. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 483–8.Google Scholar

Hartog, CS, Reuter, D, Loesche, W, Hofmann, M, Reinhart, K. Influence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 on hemostasis as measured by viscoelastic device analysis: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 1725–37.Google Scholar

Casutt, M, Kristoffy, A, Schuepfer, G, Spahn, DR, Konrad, C. Effects on coagulation of balanced (130/0.42) and non-balanced (130/0.4) hydroxyethyl starch or gelatin compared with balanced Ringer's solution: an in vitro study using two different viscoelastic coagulation tests ROTEM™ and SONOCLOT™. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 273–81.Google Scholar

Demir, A, Aydınlı, B, Toprak, HI, et al. Impact of 6% starch 130/0.4 and 4% gelatin infusion on kidney function in living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2015; 47: 1883–9.Google Scholar

Thomas-Rueddel, DO, Vlasakov, V, Reinhart, K, et al. Safety of gelatin for volume resuscitation – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1134–42.Google Scholar

Victorian Consultative Council on Anaesthetic Mortality and Morbidity. 10th Report of the Victorian Consultative Council on Anaesthetic Mortality and Morbidity, May 2011, Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Health. http://www.health.vic.gov.au/vccamm/vccamm-reports.htm (accessed 21 June 2015).Google Scholar

Jacob, M, Paul, O, Mehringer, L, et al. Albumin augmentation improves condition of guinea pig hearts after 4 hr of cold ischemia. Transplantation 2009; 87: 956–65.Google Scholar

Kozar, RA, Peng, Z, Zhang, R, et al. Plasma restoration of endothelial glycocalyx in a rodent model of hemorrhagic shock. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 1289–95.Google Scholar

Dawidson, IJ, Sandor, ZF, Coorpender, J, et al. Intraoperative albumin administration affects the outcome of cadaver renal transplantation. Transplantation 1992; 53: 774–82.Google Scholar

Pockaj, BA, Yang, JC, Lotze, MT, et al. A prospective randomized trial evaluating colloid versus crystalloid resuscitation in the treatment of the vascular leak syndrome associated with interleukin-2 therapy. J Immunother Tumor Immunol 1994; 15: 22–8.Google Scholar

Stevens, AP, Hlady, V, Dull, RO. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy can probe albumin dynamics inside lung endothelial glycocalyx. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2007; 293: L328–35.Google Scholar

Wiedermann, CJ, Joannidis, M. Nephroprotective potential of human albumin infusion: a narrative review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 912839.Google Scholar

Finfer, S. Reappraising the role of albumin for resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19: 315–20.Google Scholar

The SAFE Study Investigators. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 874–84.Google Scholar

Caironi, P, Tognoni, G, Masson, S, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1412–21.Google Scholar

Patel, A, Laffan, MA, Waheed, U, Brett, SJ. Randomised trials of human albumin for adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of all-cause mortality. BMJ 2014; 349: g4561.Google Scholar

Raghunathan, K, Shaw, A, Nathanson, B, et al. Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: 1585–91.Google Scholar

Shaw, AD, Perner, SM, Goldstein, SL, et al. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 821–9.Google Scholar

Orbegozo Cortés, D, Rayo Bonor, A, Vincent, JL. Isotonic crystalloid solutions: a structured review of the literature. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 968–81.Google Scholar

O'Malley, CM, Frumento, RJ, Hardy, MA, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer's solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1518–24.Google Scholar

Hadimioglu, N, Saadawy, I, Saglam, T, Ertug, Z, Dinckan, A. The effect of different crystalloid solutions on acid–base balance and early kidney function after kidney transplantation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 264–9.Google Scholar

Khajavi, MR, Etezadi, F, Moharari, RS, et al. Effects of normal saline vs. lactated Ringer's during renal transplantation. Ren Fail 2008; 30: 535–9.Google Scholar

Kim, SY, Huh, KH, Lee, JR, et al. Comparison of the effects of normal saline versus Plasmalyte on acid–base balance during living donor kidney transplantation using the Stewart and base excess methods. Transplant Proc 2013; 45: 2191–6.Google Scholar

Potura, E, Lindner, G, Biesenbach, P, et al. An acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid versus 0.9% saline in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 123–9.Google Scholar

Schnuelle, P, Johannes van der Woude, F. Perioperative fluid management in renal transplantation: a narrative review of the literature. Transpl Int 2006; 19: 947–59.Google Scholar

Legendre, C, Thervet, E, Page, B, et al. Hydroxyethylstarch and osmotic-nephrosis-like lesions in kidney transplantation. Lancet 1993; 342: 248–9.Google Scholar

Cittanova, ML, Leblanc, I, Legendre, C, et al. Effect of hydroxyethylstarch in brain-dead kidney donors on renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Lancet 1996; 348: 1620.Google Scholar

Bernard, C, Alain, M, Simone, C, Xavier, M, Jean-Francois, M. Hydroxyethylstarch and osmotic nephrosis-like lesions in kidney transplants. Lancet 1996; 348: 1595.Google Scholar

Baron, JF. Adverse effects of colloids on renal function. In: Vincent, JL, ed. Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Berlin: Springer, 2000: 486–93.Google Scholar

Patel, MS, Niemann, CU, Sally, MB, et al. The impact of hydroxyethyl starch use in deceased organ donors on the development of delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients: a propensity-adjusted analysis. Am J Transplant 2015; 15: 2152–8.Google Scholar

Shenkin, HA, Bezier, HS, Bouzarth, WF. Restricted fluid intake. Rational management of the neurosurgical patient. J Neurosurg 1976; 45: 432–6.Google Scholar

Perel, P, Roberts, I, Ker, K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2: CD000567.Google Scholar

Tommasino, C. Fluids in the neurosurgical patient. Anesthesiology Clin N Am 2002; 20: 329–46.Google Scholar

Perel, A, Pizov, R, Cotev, S. Respiratory variations in the arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation reflect volume status and fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 798–807.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, M, Feibicke, T, Keyl, C, et al. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 555–61.Google Scholar

Prabhakar, H, Singh, GP, Anand, V, Kalaivani, M. Mannitol versus hypertonic saline for brain relaxation in patients undergoing craniotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 7: CD010026.Google Scholar

Xia, J, He, Z, Cao, X, et al. The brain relaxation and cerebral metabolism in stroke-volume variation-directed fluid therapy during supratentorial tumor resection: crystalloid solution versus colloid solution. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2014; 26: 320–7.Google Scholar

Ibrahim, GM, Macdonald, RL. The effects of fluid balance and colloid administration on outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a propensity score-matched analysis. Neurocrit Care 2013; 19: 140–9.Google Scholar

Dankbaar, JW, Slooter, AJ, Rinkel, GJ, Schaaf, IC. Effect of different components of triple-H therapy on cerebral perfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review. Crit Care 2010; 14: R23.Google Scholar

Roquilly, A, Loutrel, O, Cinotti, R, et al. Balanced versus chloride-rich solutions for fluid resuscitation in brain-injured patients: a randomised double-blind pilot study. Crit Care 2013; 17: R77.Google Scholar

Lehmann, L, Bendel, S, Uehlinger, DE, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of fluid composition on electrolyte, acid–base, and fluid homeostasis in patients early after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2013; 18: 5–12.Google Scholar

Verbalis, JG. Management of disorders of water metabolism in patients with pituitary tumors. Pituitary 2002; 5: 119–32.Google Scholar

SAFE Study Investigators. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 874–84.Google Scholar

Simma, B, Burger, R, Falk, M, Sacher, P, Fanconi, S. A prospective, randomized, and controlled study of fluid management in children with severe head injury: lactated Ringer's solution versus hypertonic saline. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1265–70.Google Scholar

Van Aken, HK, Kampmeier, TG, Ertmer, C, Westphal, M. Fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury: what is a SAFE approach? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25: 563–5.Google Scholar

Tan, PG, Cincotta, M, Clavisi, O, et al. Prehospital fluid management in traumatic brain injury. Emerg Med Australas 2011; 23: 665–76.Google Scholar

Zheng, F, Cammisa, FP, Sandhu, HS, Girardi, FP, Khan, SN. Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine 2002; 15: 818–24.Google Scholar

Siemionow, K, Cywinski, J, Kusza, K, Lieberman, I. Intraoperative fluid therapy and pulmonary complications. Orthopedics 2012; 35: e184–91.Google Scholar

Perel, P, Roberts, I, Ker, K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2: CD000567.Google Scholar

Reinhart, K, Perner, A, Sprung, CL, et al. Consensus statement of the ESICM task force on colloid volume therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 368–83.Google Scholar

Finfer, S, Bette, L, Colman, T, et al. Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross sectional study in 391 intensive care units. Crit Care 2010; 14: R185.Google Scholar

Singer, M. Management of fluid balance: a European perspective. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25: 96–101.Google Scholar

Vincent, JL, De Backer, D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1726–34.Google Scholar

Michard, F, Teboul, JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000–8.Google Scholar

Weil, MH, Shubin, H. Proposed reclassification of shock states with special reference to distributive defects. Adv Exp Med Biol 1971; 23: 13–23.Google Scholar

Schlichtig, R, Kramer, D, Pinsky, MR. Flow redistribution during progressive hemorrhage is a determinant of critical O₂ delivery. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70: 169–78.Google Scholar

Asfar, P, Meziani, F, Hamel, JF, et al. High versus low blood pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1583–93.Google Scholar

Vallet, B, Pinsky, MR, Cecconi, M. Resuscitation of patients with septic shock: please “Mind the Gap”! Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 1653–5.Google Scholar

Woodcock, TE, Woodcock, TM. Revised Starling equation and the glycocalyx model of transvascular fluid exchange: an improved paradigm for prescribing intravenous fluid therapy. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 384–94.Google Scholar

Clough, G. Relationship between microvascular permeability and ultrastructure. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1991; 55: 47–69.Google Scholar

Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, Boyce, N, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2247–56.Google Scholar