Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:36:13.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Outpatient Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway

from Section 2 - Basic Airway Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2017

D. John Doyle
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi
Basem Abdelmalak
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Airway Management
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
, pp. 48 - 53
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brimacombe, J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or face mask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 1017–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, TM, Woodall, N, Frerk, C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617–31.Google Scholar
Cook, T, Howes, B. Supraglottic airway devices: recent advances. BJA CEACCP 2011; 11: 5761.Google Scholar
Pandit, JJ, Popat, MT, Cook, TM, et al. The Difficult Airway Society ‘ADEPT’ guidance on selecting airway devices: the basis of a strategy for equipment evaluation. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 726–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, TM, Lee, G, Nolan, JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 739–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Brimacombe, J, Keller, C, Judd, DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X, Jiao, J, Cong, X, Liu, L, Wu, X. A comparison of the performance of the i-gel™ vs. the LMA-S™ during anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2013; 8: e71910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verghese, C, Brimacombe, JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 129–33.Google Scholar
Cook, TM, Gibbison, B. Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 436–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, TM, Gatward, JJ, Handel, J, et al. The evaluation of the LMA Supreme™ in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 555–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theiler, L, Gutzmann, M, Kleine-Brueggeney, M, Urwyler, N, Kaempfen, B, Greif, R. i-gel™ supraglottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational multicentre study. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 990–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brimacombe, J. Placement phase. In Laryngeal Mask Anaesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition, 2005. London: Saunders; pp. 191240.Google Scholar
Brimacombe, J. Problems. In Laryngeal Mask Anaesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition, 2005. London: Saunders; pp. 551–76.Google Scholar
Brimacombe, J. Resuscitation. In Laryngeal Mask Anaesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition, 2005. London: Saunders: pp. 281–96.Google Scholar
Hohlrieder, M, Brimacombe, J, von Goedecke, A, Keller, C. Guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional tracheal intubation by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 458–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, BW, Wharton, NM, Gibbison, B, Cook, TM. LMA Supreme insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia 2010: 65; 343–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wharton, NM, Gibbison, B, Gabbott, D, Haslam, GM, Cook, TM. i-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 991–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatward, JJ, Cook, TM, Seller, C, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1124–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scanlon, P, Carey, M, Power, M, Kirby, F. Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 816–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goyagi, T, Tanaka, M, Nishikawa, T. Fentanyl decreases propofol requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 771–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baik, HJ, Kim, YJ, Kim, JH. Lidocaine given intravenously improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol target-controlled infusion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 377–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kodaka, M, Handa, F, Kawasaki, J, Miyao, H. Cp50 of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion using predicted concentrations with and without nitrous oxide. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 956–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drage, MP, Nunez, J, Vaughan, RS, Asai, T. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1167–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, C, Sparr, HJ, Brimacombe, JR. Positive pressure ventilation with the laryngeal mask airway in non-paralysed patients: comparison of sevoflurane and propofol maintenance techniques. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 332–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, TM, Kelly, FE. Time to abandon the ‘vintage’ LMA and adopt 2nd-generation SADs as 1st choice. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 497–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×