Book contents
- Cicero’s De Officiis
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Cicero’s De Officiis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Framework of De Officiis
- Part II The Role of Virtue
- Part III Exemplary Ethics
- Part IV Self and Society
- Part V Politics
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2023
Edited by
Book contents
- Cicero’s De Officiis
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Cicero’s De Officiis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Framework of De Officiis
- Part II The Role of Virtue
- Part III Exemplary Ethics
- Part IV Self and Society
- Part V Politics
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cicero's ‘De Officiis'A Critical Guide, pp. 243 - 253Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Algra, K. et al. eds. 1999. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2010. ‘“A Dwelling beyond Violence”: On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Contemporary Republicans’, History of Political Thought 31, 183–220.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1989. ‘Cicero on Stoic Moral Philosophy and Private Property’, in Griffin and Barnes, 151–73.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. 1990. ‘“Domina et Regina Virtutum”: Justice and Societas in De Officiis’, Phronesis 35, 258–89.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. 2017. ‘Natural Law and Civil Religion: De legibus Book II’, in Höffe, 167–86.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. 2018. Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J. W. 2022. ‘Empire, Just Wars, and Cosmopolitanism’, in Atkins and Bénatouïl, 231–51.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. 2023. ‘Cicero on the Justice of War’, in Gilbert, N., Graver, M., and McConnell, S. eds. Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 170–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J. W. and Bénatouïl, T. eds. 2022. The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. 2012. A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barney, R. 2003. ‘A Puzzle in Stoic Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24, 303–24.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. 2019a. Cicero, Greek Learning, and the Making of a Roman Classic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. 2019b. ‘Magnum Opus: Atticus, Cicero, and Eratosthenes’ Geography’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 162, 265–91.Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Atherton, C.. 2003. ‘The Stoic Contribution to Traditional Grammar’, in Inwood, B. ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 310–27.Google Scholar
Blundell, M. 1990. ‘Parental Nature and Stoic Οἰκείωσις’, Ancient Philosophy 10, 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. 2014. ‘The kathēkon: A Report on Some Recent Work at Cornell’, Philosophie Antique 14, 41–70.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. 2001. Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1986. ‘The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. eds. The Norms of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113–44.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. 1973. ‘Aspects of the Social Thought of Dio Chrysostom and of the Stoics’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 19 (199), 9–34.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. 2013. ‘Panaetius in De Officiis’, in Griffin, M. and Samuels, A. eds. Studies in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 180–242.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. et al. 2018. ‘Introduction’, in Letters & Communities: Studies in the Socio-political Dimensions of Ancient Epistolography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–39.Google Scholar
Christian, E. 2008. ‘A Philosophy of Legitimacy in Cicero’s Philippics’, in Stevenson, and Wilson, , 153–67.Google Scholar
Cole, T. 1967. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Cleveland: Western Reserve University Press.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 2010. ‘Quid tibi ego videor in epistulis? Cicero’s verecundia’, in Rosen, R. and Sluiter, I. eds. Valuing Others in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 375–90.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. 1991. ‘τῦφος contributo alla storia di un concetto’, in Billerbeck, M. ed. Die Kyniker in der modernen Forschung: Aufsätze mit Einführung und Bibliographie. Amsterdam: Grüner, 273–85.Google Scholar
de Wilde, M. 2018. ‘Enemy of All Humanity’, Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 2, 158–75.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1990. Der Platonismus in der Antike. Band II: Der hellenistische Rahmen des kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. 2015. ‘Cicero’s Quarrels: Reception and Modernity from Horace to Tacitus’, in Altman, W. ed. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero. Leiden: Brill, 144–71.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 1979a. ‘On the Composition and Sources of Cicero, De Officiis 1.50–58’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 12, 77–84.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 1979b. ‘The plan of Panaetius’ περὶ τοῦ καθήκοντος’, American Journal of Philology 100, 408–16.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 1984. ‘Notes on Composition, Text and Sources of Cicero’s “De Officiis”’, Hermes 112, 215–28.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2002. ‘The Odiousness of Comparisons: Horace on Literary History and the Limitations of Synkrisis’, in Paschalis, M. ed. Horace and Greek Lyric Poetry. Rethymnon: University of Crete, 7–18.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. 1991. ‘Amnestie und Amnesie in der griechischen Kultur: das vergessene Selbstopfer für den Sieg im athenischen Bürgerkrieg 403 v. Chr.’, Saeculum 42, 129–49.Google Scholar
Forschner, B. 2015. Die Einheit der Ordnung. Recht, Philosophie und Gesellschaft in Ciceros Rede Pro Milone. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Gabbatiss, J. 2017. ‘Is Violence Embedded in Our DNA?’, Sapiens, www.sapiens.org/biology/human-violence-evolution.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. 2009. ‘Cicero on Property’, in Carlsen, J. and Lo Cascio, E. eds. Agricoltura e Scambi nell’ Italia Tardo-Repubblicana. Bari: Epiduglia, 157–66.Google Scholar
Gaughan, J. 2010. Murder Was Not a Crime: Homicide and Power in the Roman Republic. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gazich, R. 1995. ‘Exemplum’ ed esemplarità in Properzio. Milan: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Morrison, A.. 2007. ‘What Is a Letter?’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. eds. Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2007. ‘Greek Auxiliaries: Tragedy and Philosophy in Ciceronian Invective’, in Booth, J. ed. Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 148–82.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2011. Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1988. ‘Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6, 169–99.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2008. ‘The Ancient Self: Issues and Approaches’, in Remes, and Sihvola, , 35–56.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2019. ‘Stoic Magnanimity’, in Vasalou, S. ed. The Measure of Greatness: Philosophers on Magnanimity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49–71.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2022. Learning to Live Naturally: Stoic Ethics and Its Modern Significance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Görler, W. 1995. ‘Silencing the Trouble-maker: De Legibus and the Continuity of Cicero’s Scepticism’, in Powell, J. ed. Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 240–67.Google Scholar
Görler, W. 2004. ‘Ein sprachlicher Zufall und seine Folgen: “Wahrscheinliches” bei Karneades und bei Cicero’, in Catrein, C. ed. Kleine Schriften zur hellenistisch-römischen Philosophie von Woldemar Görler. Leiden: Brill, 60–75.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. 1996a. Der Diktator is tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des Zweiten Triumvirats. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. 1996b. ‘Cicero und die Freundschaft. Die Konstruktion sozialer Normen zwischen römischer Politik und griechischer Philosophie’, in Gehrke, H.-J. and Möller, A. eds. Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt. Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewußtsein. Tübingen: Narr, 339–60.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. 2003. ‘Ontologie versus exemplum: Griechische Philosophie als politisches Argument in der späten römischen Republik’, in Piepenbrink, K. ed. Philosophie und Lebenswelt in der Antike. Darmstadt: WBG, 165–85.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. 2008. ‘Cultural Differences and Cross-Cultural Contact: Greek and Roman Concepts of Power’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 104, 179–230.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. 2014. ‘Comment se détermine le kathekon? Remarques sur la conformité à la nature et le raisonnable’, Philosophie Antique 14, 13–39.Google Scholar
Grant, M. and Fiske, G.. 1924. ‘Cicero’s “Orator” and Horace’s “Ars Poetica”’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 35, 1–74.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1996. ‘Cynicism and the Romans’, in Bracht Branham, R. and Goulet-Cazé, M-O. eds. The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 190–204.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 2003. ‘De Beneficiis and Roman Society’, Journal of Roman Studies 93, 92–113.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 2008. ‘Iure plectimur. The Roman Critique of Roman Imperialism’, in Brennan, T. C. and Flower, H. I. eds. East & West: Papers in Ancient History presented to Glen W. Bowersock. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press, 85–111.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 2013. Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. 2017. ‘Dignity in Roman and Stoic Thought’, in Debes, R. ed. Dignity: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 47–65.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. eds. 1989. Philosophia Togata. Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M. eds. and trans. 1991. Cicero on Duties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guérin, C. 2009. ‘Philosophical Decorum and the Literarization of Rhetoric in Cicero’s Orator’, in Woerther, F. ed. Literary and Philosophical Rhetoric in the Greek, Roman, Syriac and Arabic World. Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms, 119–39.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 2000. Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1990. ‘Towards a History of Friendly Advice: The Politics of Candor in Cicero’s de Amicitia’, Apeiron 23, 165–85.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1994. ‘Ideology for an Empire in the Prefaces to Cicero’s Dialogues’, Ramus 23, 55–67.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. 2007. ‘Critolaus and Late Hellenistic Peripatetic Philosophy’, in Ioppolo, and Sedley, , 47–101.Google Scholar
Hahn, J. 2017. ‘Rituals of Killing: Public Punishment, munera, and the Dissemination of Roman Values and Ideology in the Imperium Romanum’, in Vanacker, W. and Zuiderhoek, A. eds. Imperial Identities in the Roman World. London and New York: Routledge, 36–60.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2014. Cicero’s Use of Judicial Theatre. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, K. 2016. ‘Christianity and the Roots of Human Dignity in Late Antiquity’, in Shah, T. and Hertzke, A. eds. Christianity and Freedom, Volume 1: Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–48.Google Scholar
Hawley, M. 2020. ‘Individuality and Hierarchy in Cicero’s De Officiis’, European Journal of Political Theory 19, 87–105.Google Scholar
Hawley, M. 2022. Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero’s Liberal Legacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heilmann, W. 1982. Ethische Reflexion und Römische Lebenswirklichkeit in Ciceros Schrift de Officiis. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Heldmann, K. 1976. ‘Ciceros Laelius und die Grenzen der Freundschaft. Zur Interdependenz von Literatur und Politik 44/43 v. Chr.’, Hermes 104, 72–103.Google Scholar
Heller-Roazen, D. 2009. The Enemy of All: Piracy and the Law of Nations. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Höffe, ed. 2017. Ciceros Staatsphilosophie: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar zu De republica und De legibus, Klassiker Auslegen 64. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2004. ‘Under Roman Roofs: Family, House, and Household’, in Flower, H. I. ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113–38.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2017. Libera Res Publica: Die politische Kultur des antiken Rom – Positionen und Perspektiven. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. ed. 1999. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 1983. ‘The Two Forms of Oikeiōsis in Arius and the Stoa’, in Fortenbaugh, W. ed. On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 190–201.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 1995. ‘Politics and paradox in Seneca’s De deneficiis’, in Laks, and Schofield, , 241–65.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2005. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2009. ‘Why Physics?’, in Salles, R. ed. God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–23.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2014. Ethics after Aristotle. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2016. ‘The Voice of Nature’, in Annas, J. and Betegh, G. eds. Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–66.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Gerson, L.. 2008. The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D. N. eds. 2007. Pyrrhonists, Patricians and Platonizers. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2016. ‘The Senatorial Economics of Status in the Late Republic’, in Beck, H., Jehne, M. and Serrati, J. eds. Money and Power in the Roman Republic. Brussels: Latomus, 188–207.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. 1973. ‘Greek Poetry in Cicero’s Prose Writing’, Yale Classical Studies 23, 61–112.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. 2020. ‘Roman Patriotism’, in Sardoc, M. ed. Handbook of Patriotism. Cham: Springer, 47–67.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 2006. Cicero, Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennerly, M. 2010. ‘Sermo and Stoic Sociality in Cicero’s De Officiis’, Rhetorica 28, 119–37.Google Scholar
Klein, J. 2015. ‘Making Sense of Stoic Indifferents’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49, 227–81.Google Scholar
Klein, J. 2016. ‘The Stoic Argument from Oikeiōsis’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50, 143–200.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2015. ‘Cicero on Grief and Friendship’, in Tutter, A. and Wurmser, L. eds. Grief and Its Transcendence: Memory, Identity, Creativity. New York: Routledge, 3–14.Google Scholar
Koschorke, A. et al. 2007. Der fiktive Staat: Konstruktionen des politischen Körpers in der Geschichte Europas. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. 2006. ‘Emulation and the Use of Role Models in Moral Education’, Journal of Moral Education 35, 37–49.Google Scholar
Labowsky, L. 1934. Die Ethik des Painaitios: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Decorum bei Cicero und Horaz. Leipzig: Meiner.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Schofield, M. eds. 1995. Justice and Generosity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2011. ‘Roman Exempla and Situation Ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicero de Officiis’, Journal of Roman Studies 101, 100–22.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2018. Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2020. ‘Aemulatio & Imitatio in Roman Exemplary Ethics’, in Bettenworth, A., Boschung, D. and Formisano, M. eds. Students, Followers and Disciples. Aemulatio and Imitatio of Role Models in the Ancient Mediterranean. Paderborn: Fink.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2021. ‘Roman Exemplary Ethics: Rules and the Unruly’, in Clarke, M. and Corran, E. eds. Rules and Ethics: Perspectives from Anthropology and History. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 103–23.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. forthcoming. ‘Sites of Exemplarity and the Challenge of Accessing the Cultural Memory of the Republic’, in Dinter, M. and Guérin, C. eds. Cultural Memory in Republican and Augustan Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 2001. Panaitios’ und Ciceros Pflichtenlehre: vom philosophischen Traktat zum politischen Lehrbuch. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Lentano, M. 2018. ‘Kinship’, in Bettini, M. & Short, W. eds. The World through Roman Eyes: Anthropological Approaches to Ancient Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171–90.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 1998. ‘Rhétorique et philosophie: la monstruosité politique chez Cicéron’, Revue des Études Latines 76, 139–57.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 2003. ‘Y a-t-il quelqu’un derrière le masque? A propos de la théorie des personae chez Cicéron’, Ítaca: Quaderns Catalans de Cultura Clàssica 19, 127–40.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1995. ‘Cicero’s Politics in De officiis,’ in Laks, and Schofield, , 213–40.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N.. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2002. ‘Horace, Cicero and Augustus, or the Poet Statesman at Epistles 2.1.256’, in Woodman, A. and Feeney, D. C. eds. Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 158–71.Google Scholar
Luban, D. 2018a. ‘The Enemy of All Humanity’, Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 2, 112–37.Google Scholar
Luban, D. 2018b. ‘On the Humanity of the Enemy of Humanity’, Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 2, 187–99.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. trans. and Reydams-Schils, G. ed. 2020. Musonius Rufus: That One Should Disdain Hardships: The Teachings of a Roman Stoic. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Manent, P. 2006. A World beyond Politics? A Defense of the Nation-State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. 2002. ‘Familie, Verwandtschaft und Staat in der römischen Republik’, in Spielvogel, J. ed. Res publica reperta: Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats. Stuttgart: Steiner, 13–24.Google Scholar
Martin, J. 2009. ‘Das Vaterland der Väter: Familie, Politik und cognatische Verwandtschaft in Rom’, in Bedingungen menschlichen Handelns in der Antike: Gesammelte Beiträge zur Historischen Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Steiner, 311–27.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. 2005. ‘Extend or Identify: Two Stoic Accounts of Altruism’, in Salles, R. ed. Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 413–43.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. 2014. Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. 2017. ‘Demetrius of Laconia and the Debate between the Stoics and Epicureans on the Nature of Parental Love’, Classical Quarterly 67, 149–62.Google Scholar
Miller, W. trans. 1913. Cicero: De Officiis. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. 1986. ‘Moral Rules and the Aims of Stoic Ethics’, Journal of Philosophy 83, 556–8.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 2007. Popular Morality in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 2017. ‘Ciceros Archäologie des römischen Staates in De re publica II: Ein Exempel römischen Philosophierens’, in Höffe, , 47–72.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 2022. ‘Vorbilder – und wie man ihnen folgen soll: Exemplarität in Ciceros praktischer Philosophie’, in Summa, M. and Mertens, K. eds. Das Exemplarische: Orientierung für menschliches Wissen und Handeln. Paderborn: Brill Mentis, 217–39.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. 1997. Cicerone e l’eloquenza romana: Retorica e progetto culturale. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Nederman, C. 2000. ‘War, Peace, and Republican Virtue: Patriotism and the Neglected Legacy of Cicero’, in Thompson, N. ed. Instilling Ethics. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 17–29.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. ed. 2012. Cicero’s Practical Philosophy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1980. The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome, trans. P. S. Falla. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1996. ‘Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism’, in Cohen, J. ed. For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism. Boston: Beacon Press, 2–17.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1997. ‘Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism’, Journal of Political Philosophy 5, 1–25.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2000. ‘Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero’s Problematic Legacy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 8, 176–206.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2019. The Cosmopolitan Tradition: A Noble but Flawed Ideal. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2022. ‘Cicero and Twenty-First Century Political Philosophy’, in Atkins, and Bénatouïl, , 284–300.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plasberg, O. and Simbeck, K.. 1917. M. Tulli Ciceronis scripta quae manserunt omnia, Fasciculus 47, Cato maior. Laelius. De gloria. Berlin and Boston: Teubner.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. 1933. ‘τὸ πρέπον: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des griechischen Geistes’, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen aus dem Jahre 1933, 53–92.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. 1934. Antikes Führertum: Cicero De officiis und das Lebensideal des Panaetios. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Powers, N. 2012. ‘The Stoic Argument for the Rationality of the Cosmos’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43, 145–269.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2009. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts, trans. D. Konstan. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. 1994. ‘The Senate, Mark Antony, and Caesar’s Legislative Legacy’, Classical Quarterly 44, 130–45.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. 2004. ‘Did Julius Caesar Temporarily Banish Mark Antony from his Inner Circle?’, Classical Quarterly 54, 161–73.Google Scholar
Rauh, S. 2018. ‘Cato at Utica: The Emergence of a Roman Suicide Tradition’, American Journal of Philology 139, 59–91.Google Scholar
Rawson, B. 1991. Children and Childhood in Roman Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Remes, P. and Sihvola, J. eds. 2008. Ancient Philosophy of the Self. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Roller, M. 2004. ‘Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia’, Classical Philology 99, 1–56.Google Scholar
Roller, M. 2018. Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rollinger, C. 2014. Amicitia sanctissime colenda. Freundschaft und soziale Netzwerke in der Späten Republik. Heidelberg: Verlag Antike.Google Scholar
Rollinger, C. 2017. ‘Beyond Laelius. The Orthopraxy of Friendship in the Late Republic’, Ciceroniana On Line I.2, 343–67.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 1991. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2018. The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1991. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1995. ‘Two Stoic Approaches to Justice’, in Laks, and Schofield, , 191–212.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1999. Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2012a. ‘Antiochus on Social Virtue’, in Sedley, D. ed. The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–87.Google Scholar
Sigismund, S. 2008. Der politische Mord in der späten Römischen Republik. Hamburg: Kovac.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2009. The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Vol. 1 of Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. eds. The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2006. Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2005. Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. and Wilson, M. eds. 2008. Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology. Auckland: Prudentia, 37–38.Google Scholar
Stone, A. M. 2008. ‘Greek Ethics and Roman Statesmen: De Officiis and the Philippics’, in Stevenson, and Wilson, , 214–39.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. 2016. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1996. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 2022. ‘Panaetius Peri tou kathēkontos in Cicero’s De Officiis’, in From Aristotle to Cicero: Essays on Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 222–44.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. 2003. ‘Adulta Virgo: The Personification of Textual Eloquence in Cicero’s Brutus’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 50, 115–40.Google Scholar
Tan, J. 2017. Power and Public Finance at Rome, 264–49 BCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thome, G. 1999. ‘Iustitia – Geschichte eines Wortes und einer Idee’, Anregung 45, 150–68.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2007. ‘Panaetius’ Place in the History of Stoicism’, in Ioppolo, and Sedley, , 103–42.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 2005. ‘Putting the Family Across: Cicero on Natural Affection’, in George, M. ed. The Roman Family in the Empire: Rome, Italy, and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–35.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 2007. Terentia, Tullia and Publilia: The Women of Cicero’s Family. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. 2019. Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1996. Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ungern-Sternberg, J. von. 1970. Untersuchungen zum spätrepublikanischen Notstandsrecht: Senatus consultum ultimum und hostis-Erklärung. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
van der Blom, H. 2010. Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Veillard, C. 2014. ‘Comment définir le devoir? Le peri kathēkontos de Panétius’, Philosophie Antique 14, 71–109.Google Scholar
Verboven, K. 2002. The Economy of Friends: Economic Aspects of Amicitia and Patronage in the Late Republic. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Viroli, M. 1995. For Love of Country: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. 2000. Cicero: On Obligations, translated with introduction and notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walters, B. 2020. The Deaths of the Republic: Imagery of the Body Politic in Ciceronian Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, P. 1983. ‘Mythological Exempla in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria’, Classical Philology 78, 117–26.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. ed. 1994. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Officiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, N. 1988. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. 2007. ‘Particularism, Promises, and Persons in Cicero’s De officiis’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33, 317–46.Google Scholar
Yong, E. 2016. ‘Humans: Unusually Murderous Mammals, Typically Murderous Primates’, The Atlantic, www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/09/humans-are-unusually-violent-mammals-but-averagely-violent-primates/501935/.Google Scholar