Book contents
- Chinese Politeness
- Chinese Politeness
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Prologue
- 1 Pragmatics, Politeness, and Chinese Politeness
- 2 Hierarchy and Harmony: Roots of Chinese Face and Politeness
- 3 Chinese Face
- 4 Chinese Politeness and Theories of Politeness
- 5 Synchronic Consistency and Variation
- 6 Diachronic Stability and Change
- 7 In Comparison with East Asian Languages
- 8 In Comparison with English: An East-West Divide?
- 9 Politeness Theories
- Epilogue
- References
- Index
4 - Chinese Politeness and Theories of Politeness
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2023
- Chinese Politeness
- Chinese Politeness
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Prologue
- 1 Pragmatics, Politeness, and Chinese Politeness
- 2 Hierarchy and Harmony: Roots of Chinese Face and Politeness
- 3 Chinese Face
- 4 Chinese Politeness and Theories of Politeness
- 5 Synchronic Consistency and Variation
- 6 Diachronic Stability and Change
- 7 In Comparison with East Asian Languages
- 8 In Comparison with English: An East-West Divide?
- 9 Politeness Theories
- Epilogue
- References
- Index
Summary
In this transitional chapter, Chen proposes a model of Chinese politeness (MCP): “Politeness is the judgement of a behavior – both linguistic and otherwise – that it is appropriate in context for the purpose of harmony.” Appropriateness, further, is defined in terms of the position of the speaker and hearer; the maintaining of face, and the avoidance of friction between all parties involved. Chen then moves to the proposal of a general politeness theory based on Brown and Levinson’s theory but with the incorporation into it notions of self-politeness and impoliteness. The theory – Brown and Levinson extended (B&L-E) – is a set of causality relations: waht a speaker does (either benefitting or hurting) to face (either self-face or other-face) leads to a particular type of politeness or impoliteness. The benefitting of other-face, for instance, often leads to the evaluation of politeness. The benefitting of self-face, on the other hand, may (or may not) result in a judgement of impoliteness to other. Of the two models, Chen argues, MCP is a cultural specification of B&L-E. His view is therefore that there should be a universal theory of politeness such as B&L-E, which is capable of subsuming under it culture-specific models such as MCP.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Chinese PolitenessDiachrony, Variation, and Universals in Politeness Theory, pp. 50 - 68Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023