Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:59:10.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Children's Rights and Capacities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2009

Melinda G. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Doctoral candidate in community psychology University of Virginia
N. Dickon Reppucci
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychology and Director of Graduate Studies University of Virginia
Bette L. Bottoms
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Margaret Bull Kovera
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Bradley D. McAuliff
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Get access

Summary

The notion that children possess rights is relatively recent in U.S. history. In the last 150 years, children's nurturance rights have been established, and some rights to self-determination for minors have also begun to emerge. The extension of certain rights to minors has raised a number of questions regarding their understanding of and capacity to exercise these rights in legally relevant contexts. In the last several decades, psychology has made important strides toward answering these questions. In this chapter, we first offer a historical context for the emergence of children's rights; then we outline five areas of the law that have witnessed significant change in recent years. Finally, we discuss social science research on children's understanding of the law and their rights, as well as children's competence to make legally relevant decisions.

A BRIEF HISTORICAL CONTEXT

For hundreds of years, children in the United States were valued mainly as economic assets in a largely agrarian society. It was not until the mid-1800s that children began to be valued sentimentally and recognized as requiring nurturance and protection (Hart, 1991; Walker, Brooks, & Wrightsman, 1999). To meet these needs, the family was given the responsibility as well as the autonomy to provide for the best interests of children (Chisholm, 1981; Reppucci & Crosby, 1993).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitch, R., Peterson-Badali, M., & Rohan, M. (1995). Young people's understanding and assertion of their rights to silence and legal counsel. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 1–18Google Scholar
Ambuel, B., & Rappaport, J. (1992). Developmental trends in adolescents' psychological and legal competence to consent to abortion. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 129–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S. (1989). Admitting children to psychiatric hospitals: A controversy revived. Law & Psychiatry, 40, 334–335Google ScholarPubMed
Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622 (1979)
Belter, R. W., & Grisso, T. (1984). Children's recognition of rights violations in counseling. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 899–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, B. L., Reppucci, N. D., Tweed, J. A., & Nysse, K. L. (in press). Children, psychology, and law Reflections on past and future contributions to science and policy. In J. Ogloff & Ron Roesch (Eds.), Taking psychology and law into the 21st century. New York: Kluwar Academic/Plenum Publishers
Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519 (1975)
Britner, P. A., LaFleur, S. J., & Whitehead, A. J. (1998). Evaluating juveniles' competence to make abortion decisions: How social science can inform the law. The University of Chicago Roundtable, 5, 35–62Google Scholar
Caeti, T. J., Hemmens, C., & Burton, V. S. Jr. (1996). Juvenile right to counsel: A national comparison of state legal codes. American Journal of Criminal Law, 23, 611–632Google Scholar
Chisholm, B. A. (1981). Children's rights. Early Child Development and Care, 7, 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 462 U.S. 416 (1983)
Crosby, C. A., & Reppucci, N. D. (1993). The legal system and adolescents. In P. H. Tolan & B. J. Cohler (Eds.), Handbook of clinical research and practice with adolescents (pp. 281–304). New York: Wiley
Crosby-Currie, C. (1996). Children's involvement in contested custody cases: Practices and experiences of legal and mental health professionals. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby-Currie, C., & Reppucci, N. D. (1999). The missing child in child protection: The constitutional context of child maltreatment from Meyer to Deshaney.Law & Society, 21, 129–160Google Scholar
Davis, S. M., & Schwartz, M. D. (1987). Children's rights and the law. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath
Davis, S. M., Scott, E. S., Wadlington, W., & Whitebread, C. H. (1997). Children in the legal system (2nd ed.). New York: Foundation Press
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1984)
Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979)
Flin, R. H., Stevenson, Y., & Davies, G. M. (1989). Children's knowledge of court proceedings. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 285–297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, W., Scherer, D., & Tester, M. (1989). Asserting scientific authority: Cognitive development and adolescent legal rights. American Psychologist, 44, 895–902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975)
Grisso, T. (1980). Juveniles' capacities to waive Miranda rights: An empirical analysis. California Law Review, 68, 1134–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles' waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenum
Grisso, T., & Pomiciter, C. (1977). Interrogation of juveniles: An empirical study of procedures, safeguards, and rights waiver. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 321–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisso, T., & Vierling, L. (1978). Minors' consent to treatment: A developmental perspective. Professional Psychology, 9, 412–427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, M. (1993). Children's legal rights? A historical look at a legal paradox. In R. Wollons (Ed.), Children at risk in America: History, concepts, and public policy (pp. 111–140). Albany: State University of New York Press
H.L. v. Matheson, 450 U.S. 398 (1981)
Harbin v. Harbin, 238 Ga. 109 (1976)
Hart, S. N. (1991). From property to person status: Historical perspective on children's rights. American Psychologist, 46, 53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. N. (1993). Children's rights in a civilized society. In M. A. Jensen & S. G. Goffin (Eds.), Visions of entitlement (pp. 85–131). Albany: State University of New York Press
Hartigan v. Zbaraz, 484 U.S. 171 (1987)
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988)
Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990)
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967)
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970)
Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977)
Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966)
Kirby v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 951 (1972)
Koocher, G. P., & DeMaso, D. R. (1990). Children's competence to consent to medical procedures. Pediatrician, 17, 68–73Google ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, R. A. (1983). The role of legal counsel in juveniles' understanding of their rights. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 34, 49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. C. (1980). A comparison of minors' and adults' pregnancy decisions. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 446–453CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, C. C. (1987). Minors' competence to consent to abortion. American Psychologist, 42, 79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfredi, C. P. (1998). The Supreme Court and juvenile justice. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas
McCabe, M. A. (1996). Involving children and adolescents in medical decision making: Developmental and clinical considerations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 505–516Google ScholarPubMed
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971)
Meisl, A., Roth, L. H., & Lidz, C. W. (1977). Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 285–289Google Scholar
Melton, G. B. (1980). Children's concepts of their rights. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 186–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, G. B. (1982). Children's rights: Where are the children?American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 530–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, G. B. (1983). Toward “personhood” for adolescents: Autonomy and privacy as values in public policy. American Psychologist, 38, 99–103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melton, G. B. (1984). Developmental psychology and the law: The state of the art. Journal of Family Law, 22, 445–482Google Scholar
Melton, G. B. (1987). Legal regulation of adolescent abortion: Unintended effects. American Psychologist, 42, 79–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melton, G. B. (1989). Are adolescents people? Problems of liberty, entitlement, and responsibilty. In J. Worrell & F. Danner (Eds.), The adolescent as decision-maker: Applications to development and education. Educational psychology (pp. 281–306). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Melton, G. B., & Ehrenreich, N. S. (1992). Ethical and legal issues in mental health services for children. In C. E. Walker & M. C. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook of clinical child psychology, (2nd ed., pp. 1035–1055). New York: Wiley
Melton, G. B., Koocher, G. P., & Saks, M. J. (1983). Children's competence to consent. New York: Plenum
Melton, G. B., & Limber, S. P. (1992). What children's rights mean to children: Children's own views. In M. Freeman & P. Veerman (Eds.), The ideologies of children's rights (pp. 167–187). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff
Melton, G. B., Lyons, P. M., Jr., & Spaulding, W. J. (1998). No place to go: The civil commitment of minors. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
Melton, G. B., & Pliner, A. J. (1986). Adolescent abortion: A psychological analysis. In G. B. Melton (Ed.), Adolescent abortion: Psychological and legal issues (pp. 1–39). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
Melton, G. B., & Stanley, B. H. (1996). Research involving special populations. In B. H. Stanley & Joan E. Sieber (Eds.), Research ethics: A psychological approach (pp. 177–202). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923)
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
Mnookin, R. H. (1978). Children's rights: Beyond kiddie libbers and child savers. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 7, 163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, R. H. (1985). Bellotti v. Baird: A hard case. In R. H. Mnookin (Ed.), In the interest of children: Advocacy, law reform, and public policy (pp. 149–264). New York: W. H. Freeman
New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985)
Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 497 U.S. 502 (1990)
Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979)
Penkower, J. A. (1996). The potential right of chronically ill adolescents to refuse life-saving medical treatment – Fatal misuse of the mature minor doctrine. Depaul Law Review, 45, 1165–1216Google ScholarPubMed
Perry, N. W., McAuliff, B. D., Tam, P., Claycomb, L., Dostal, C., & Flanagan, C. (1995). When lawyers question children: Is justice served?Law and Human Behavior, 19, 609–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson-Badali, M., & Abramovitch, R. (1992). Children's knowledge of the legal system: Are they competent to instruct legal counsel?Canadian Journal of Criminology, 34, 139–160Google Scholar
Peterson-Badali, M., Abramovitch, R., & Duda, J. (1997). Young children's legal knowledge and reasoning ability. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39, 145–170Google Scholar
Peterson-Badali, M., Abramovitch, R., Koegl, C. J., & Ruck, M. D. (1999). Young people's experience of the Canadian youth justice system: Interacting with police and legal counsel. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 455–4653.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson-Badali, M., & Koegl, C. J. (1998). Young people's knowledge of the Young Offenders Act and the youth justice system. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 40, 127–152Google Scholar
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925)
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976)
Pliner, A. J., & Yates, S. M. (1992). Psychological and legal issues in minors' rights to abortion. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 203–216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portwood, S. G., Reppucci, N. D., & Mitchell, M. S. (1998). Balancing rights and responsibilities: Legal perspectives on child maltreatment. In J. R. Lutzker (Ed.), Handbook of child abuse research and treatment (pp. 31–52). New York: PlenumCrossRef
Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944)
Reppucci, N. D. (1999). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 307–326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reppucci, N. D., & Crosby, C. A. (1993). Law, psychology, and children: Overarching issues. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
Rogers, C. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1978). Attitudes toward children's rights: Nurturance or self-determination?Journal of Social Issues, 34, 59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruck, M. D., Keating, D. P., Abramovitch, R., & Koegl, C. J. (1998). Adolescents' and children's knowledge about rights: Some evidence for how young people view rights in their own lives. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 275–289CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saywitz, K. J. (1989). Children's conceptions of the legal system: “Court is a place to play basketball.” In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 131–157). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Saywitz, K. J., Jaenicke, C., & Camparo, L. (1991). Children's knowledge of legal terminology. Law & Human Behavior, 14, 523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253 (1984)
Scherer, D. G. (1991). The capacities of minors to exercise voluntariness in medical treatment decisions. Law & Human Behavior, 15, 431–449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherer, D. G., & Reppucci, N. D. (1988). Adolescents' capacities to provide voluntary informed consent: The effects of parental influence and medical dilemmas. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 123–141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, E. S. (1984). Adolescents' reproductive rights: Abortion, contraception, and sterilization. In N. D. Reppucci, L. A. Weithorn, E. P. Mulvey, & J. Monahan (Eds.), Children, mental health, and the law (pp. 125–150). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Scott, E. S., Reppucci, N. D., & Aber, M. (1988). Children's preference in adjudicated custody decisions. Georgia Law Review, 22, 1035–1078Google Scholar
Scott, E. S., Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. L. (1995). Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 221–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989)
State In Interest of Causey, 363 So. 2d 472 (1978)
Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapp, J. L. (1976). Psychology and the law: An overture. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 359–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapp, J. L., & Levine, F. J. (1974). Legal socialization: Strategies for an ethical legality. Stanford Law Review, 27, 1–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988)
Tinker v. DesMoines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act 402, 9 Uniform Laws Annotated 35 (1970, as amended 1971, 1973)
Wadlington, W. (1973). Minors and health care: The age of consent. Osgood Hall Law Journal, 11, 115–125Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, N. E., Brooks, C. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). Children's rights in the United States: In search of a national policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Warren-Leubecker, A., Tate, C. S., Hinton, I. D., & Ozbek, N. (1989). What do children know about the legal system and when do they know it? First steps down a less traveled path in child witness research. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 158–183). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Weithorn, L. A. (1984). Children's capacities in legal contexts. In N. D. Reppucci, L. A. Weithorn, E. P. Mulvey, & J. Monahan (Eds.), Children, mental health, and the law (pp. 125–150). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Weithorn, L. A. (1988). Mental hospitalization of troublesome youth: An analysis of skyrocketing admission rates. Stanford Law Review, 40, 773–838CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weithorn, L. A., & Campbell, S. B. (1982). The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Development, 53, 1589–1598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winburn v. State, 32 Wis. 2d 152 (1966)
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972)
Woolard, J. L., Reppucci, N. D., & Redding, R. E. (1996). Theoretical and methodological issues in studying children's capacities in legal contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrell, C. (1985). Pretrial detention of juveniles: Denial of equal protection masked by the parens patriae doctrine. Yale Law Journal, 95, 174–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, F. E. (1982). The changing legal world of adolescence. New York: Free Press
Zimring, F. E. (1998). American youth violence. New York: Oxford University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×