Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Towards Achilles: Shipbuilding and Repair
- 2 Improving the Facilities
- 3 Manufacturing and the Move to Steam Power
- 4 Storage, Security and Materials
- 5 Economics, Custom and the Workforce
- 6 Local Management
- 7 Central Management
- Appendix 1 Ships and Other Vessels Built at Chatham Royal Dockyard, 1815–1865
- Appendix 2 Post Holders, 1816–1865
- Documents and Sources
- Index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
1 - Towards Achilles: Shipbuilding and Repair
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2024
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Towards Achilles: Shipbuilding and Repair
- 2 Improving the Facilities
- 3 Manufacturing and the Move to Steam Power
- 4 Storage, Security and Materials
- 5 Economics, Custom and the Workforce
- 6 Local Management
- 7 Central Management
- Appendix 1 Ships and Other Vessels Built at Chatham Royal Dockyard, 1815–1865
- Appendix 2 Post Holders, 1816–1865
- Documents and Sources
- Index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
Summary
Throughout the period 1815 to 1865, the primary tasks undertaken by Chatham dockyard were those of constructing new ships and of undertaking large-scale repairs on older vessels. In common with most other yards, Chatham also undertook a multiplicity of further duties. Among these were the fitting and re-fitting of ships [29, 37], the care and maintenance of vessels moored in the ordinary [37] and minor repairs on operational warships. With regard to the latter, Chatham was not especially suited. In part, this was because of its great distance from the sea but also a result of the declining depth of the Medway. The river, during much of this period, was subject to considerable shoaling, there being an insufficient depth both for the larger ships of the ordinary and for rapid, trouble-free passages between the dockyard and the open sea. It was recognition of these problems that prompted John Deas Thomson, a member of the Navy Board, to submit to Lord Melville in 1829 a recommendation that Chatham should be strictly confined to those duties to which it was geographically suited [31]. However, the idea of Chatham specialising in building and large-scale repairs, was not adopted at this time and the yard continued to perform a mixture of duties throughout the nineteenth century.
The Admiralty, whenever a new vessel was to be constructed, took the initial decision with instructions forwarded to Chatham by either the Navy Board (prior to its abolition in 1832) or the Admiralty office (after 1832). Such orders were often accompanied by a set of drawings, although on occasions it might be a simple notification, with drawings sent nearer to the time of construction [56, 57, 73]. On being informed that a new ship was to be built, the Master Shipwright, whose department oversaw both construction and repair work, would consider the facilities and manpower that would be required. Of course, the administrators in London already had an awareness of docks and slips likely to be available, sometimes precisely stipulating which facility was to be used [12, 14, 28]. The choice of Chatham for construction of a new vessel was not always contingent upon the availability of a particular dock or slip; instead it might result from an accumulation of the necessary building materials at that yard [17].
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Chatham Dockyard, 1815-1865The Industrial Transformation, pp. 1 - 52Publisher: Boydell & BrewerFirst published in: 2024