Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:26:00.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Phase Change, Nucleation, and Cavitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

Christopher Earls Brennen
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This first chapter will focus on the mechanisms of formation of two-phase mixtures of vapor and liquid. Particular attention will be given to the process of the creation of vapor bubbles in a liquid. In doing so we will attempt to meld together several overlapping areas of research activity. First, there are the studies of the fundamental physics of nucleation as epitomized by the books of Frenkel (1955) and Skripov (1974). These deal largely with very pure liquids and clean environments in order to isolate the behavior of pure liquids. On the other hand, most engineering systems are impure or contaminated in ways that have important effects on the process of nucleation. The later part of the chapter will deal with the physics of nucleation in such engineering environments. This engineering knowledge tends to be divided into two somewhat separate fields of interest, cavitation and boiling. A rough but useful way of distinguishing these two processes is to define cavitation as the process of nucleation in a liquid when the pressure falls below the vapor pressure, while boiling is the process of nucleation that ocurs when the temperature is raised above the saturated vapor/liquid temperature. Of course, from a basic physical point of view, there is little difference between the two processes, and we shall attempt to review the two processes of nucleation simultaneously.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, A.J. and Parkin, B.R. (1975). Cavitation inception—a selective review. J. Ship Res., 19, 193–205.Google Scholar
Arakeri, V.H. (1979). Cavitation inception. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., C2, Part 2, 149–177.Google Scholar
Arakeri, V.H. and Acosta, A.J. (1974). Viscous effects in the inception of cavitation on axisymmetric bodies. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 95, No. 4, 519–528.Google Scholar
Arndt, R.E.A. and Ippen, A.T. (1968). Rough surface effects on cavitation inception. ASME J. Basic Eng., 90, 249–261.Google Scholar
Becker, R. and Doring, W. (1935). The kinetic treatment of nuclear formation in supersatu-rated vapors. Ann. Phys., 24, 719 and 752.Google Scholar
Bernath, L. (1952). Theory of bubble formation in liquids. Ind. Eng. Chem., 44, No. 6, 1310–1313.Google Scholar
Berthelot, M. (1850). Sur quelques phénomenes de dilation forcée de liquides. Ann. de Chimie et de Physique, 30, 232–237.Google Scholar
Billet, M.L. (1985). Cavitation nuclei measurement—a review. Proc. 1985 ASME Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, 31–38.
Blake, F.G. (1949). The tensile strength of liquids; a review of the literature. Harvard Acou. Res. Lab. Rep. TM9.
Blander, M. and Katz, J.L. (1975). Bubble nucleation in liquids. AIChE Journal, 21, No. 5, 833–848.Google Scholar
Carey, V.P. (1992). Liquid-vapor phase-change phenomena. Hemisphere Publ. Co.
Cole, R. (1970). Boiling nucleation. Adv. Heat Transfer, 10, 86–166.Google Scholar
Davies, R.M., Trevena, D.H., Rees, N.J.M., and Lewis, G.M. (1956). The tensile strength of liquids under dynamic stressing. Proc. N.P.L. Symp. on Cavitation in Hydrodynamics.
Dixon, H.H. (1909). Note on the tensile strength of water. Sci. Proc. Royal Dublin Soc., 12, (N.S.), 60 (see also 14, (N.S.), 229, (1914)).Google Scholar
Eberhart, J.G. and Schnyders, M.C. (1973). Application of the mechanical stability condition to the prediction of the limit of superheat for normal alkanes, ether, and water. J. Phys. Chem., 77, No. 23, 2730–2736.Google Scholar
Farkas, L. (1927). The velocity of nucleus formation in supersaturated vapors. J. Physik Chem., 125, 236.Google Scholar
Fox, F.E. and Herzfeld, K.F. (1954). Gas bubbles with organic skin as cavitation nuclei. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 26, 984–989.Google Scholar
Frenkel, J. (1955). Kinetic theory of liquids. Dover, New York.
Gates, E.M. and Acosta, A.J. (1978). Some effects of several free stream factors on cavitation inception on axisymmetric bodies. Proc. 12th Naval Hydrodyn. Symp., Wash. D.C., 86–108.
Gates, E.M. and Bacon, J. (1978). Determination of cavitation nuclei distribution by holography. J. Ship Res., 22, No. 1, 29–31.Google Scholar
Gibbs, W. (1961). The Scientific Papers, Vol. 1.Dover Publ. Inc., NY.
Griffith, P. and Wallis, J.D. (1960). The role of surface conditions in nucleate boiling. Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp., Ser. 56, 30, 49.Google Scholar
Harvey, E.N., Barnes, D.K., McElroy, W.D., Whiteley, A.H., Pease, D.C., and Cooper, K.W. (1944). Bubble formation in animals. I, Physical factors. J. Cell. and Comp. Physiol., 24, No. 1, 1–22.Google Scholar
Holl, J.W. and Wislicenus, G.F. (1961). Scale effects on cavitation. ASME J. Basic Eng., 83, 385–398.Google Scholar
Holl, J.W. and Treaster, A.L. (1966). Cavitation hysteresis. ASME J. Basic Eng., 88, 199–212.Google Scholar
Johnsson, C.A. (1969). Cavitation inception on headforms, further tests. Proc. 12th Int. Towing Tank Conf., Rome, 381–392.
Katz, J. (1978). Determination of solid nuclei and bubble distributions in water by holography. Calif.Inst. of Tech., Eng. and Appl. Sci. Div. Rep. No. 183–3.
Katz, J., Gowing, S., O'Hern, T., and Acosta, A.J. (1984). A comparitive study between holographic and light-scattering techniques of microbubble detection. Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Measuring Techniques in Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flows, 41–66.
Keller, A.P. (1974). Investigations concerning scale effects of the inception of cavitation. Proc. I.Mech.E. Conf. on Cavitation, 109–117.
Kermeen, R.W. (1956). Water tunnel tests of NACA 4412 and Walchner profile 7 hydrofoils in non-Cavitating and cavitating Flows. Calif. Inst. of Tech. Hydro. Lab. Rep.47–5.
Knapp, R.T., Daily, J.W., and Hammitt, F.G. (1970). Cavitation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Lienhard, J.H. and Karimi, A. (1981). Homogeneous nucleation and the spinodal line. ASME J. Heat Transfer, 103, 61–64.Google Scholar
Lindgren, H. and Johnsson, C.A. (1966). Cavitation inception on headforms, ITTC comparitive experiments. Proc. 11th Towing Tank Conf. Tokyo, 219–232.
Meyer, J. (1911). Zur Kenntnis des negativen Druckes in Flüssigkeiten. Abhandl. Dent. Bunsen Ges., III, No. 1; also No. 6.Google Scholar
O'Hern, T.J., Katz, J., and Acosta, A.J. (1985). Holographic measurements of cavitation nuclei in the sea. Proc. ASME Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, 39–42.
O'Hern, T., d'Agostino, L., and Acosta, A.J. (1988). Comparison of holographic and Coulter counter measurements of cavitation nuclei in the ocean. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 110, 200–207.Google Scholar
Parsons, C.A. (1906). The steam turbine on land and at sea. Lecture to the Royal Institution, London.
Peterson, F.B., Danel, F., Keller, A.P., and Lecoffre, Y. (1975). Comparitive measurements of bubble and particulate spectra by three optical methods. Proc. 14th Int. Towing Tank Conf.
Rees, E.P. and Trevena, D.H. (1966). Cavitation thresholds in liquids under static conditions. Proc. ASME Cavitation Forum, 12 (see also (1967), 1).
Reynolds, O. (1873). The causes of the racing of the engines of screw steamers investigated theoretically and by experiment. Trans. Inst. Naval Arch., 14, 56–67.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O. (1882). On the internal cohesion of liquids and the suspension of a column of mercury to a height of more than double that of the barometer. Mem. Manchester Lit. Phil. Soc., 7, 3rd Series, 1.Google Scholar
Rood, E.P. (1991). Mechanisms of cavitation inception—review. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 113, 163–175.Google Scholar
Skripov, V.P. (1974). Metastable Liquids. John Wiley and Sons.
Vincent, R.S. (1941). The measurement of tension in liquids by means of a metal bellows. Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 53, 126–140.Google Scholar
Vincent, R.S. and Simmonds, G.H. (1943). Examination of the Berthelot method of measuring tension in liquids. Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 55, 376–382.Google Scholar
Volmer, M. and Weber, A. (1926). Keimbildung in übersättigten Gebilden. Zeit. Physik. Chemie, 119, 277–301.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, J.B. (1943). On the theory of new phase formation: cavitation. Acta Physicochimica, URSS, 18, 1–22.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×