Book contents
- Cavell’s Must We Mean What We Say? at 50
- Cambridge Philosophical Anniversaries
- Cavell’s Must We Mean What We Say? at 50
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations for Cavell’s Works
- Introduction
- Part I Ordinary Language and Its Philosophy
- Part II Aesthetics and the Modern
- Part III Tragedy and the Self
- 9 Philosophy as Autobiography
- 10 The Finer Weapon
- 11 On Cavell’s “Kierkegaard’s On Authority and Revelation” – with Constant Reference to Austen
- 12 Tragic Implication
- 13 Gored States and Theatrical Guises
- Bibliography
- Index of Names and Subjects
- Index of References to Cavell’s Works
12 - Tragic Implication
from Part III - Tragedy and the Self
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2022
- Cavell’s Must We Mean What We Say? at 50
- Cambridge Philosophical Anniversaries
- Cavell’s Must We Mean What We Say? at 50
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations for Cavell’s Works
- Introduction
- Part I Ordinary Language and Its Philosophy
- Part II Aesthetics and the Modern
- Part III Tragedy and the Self
- 9 Philosophy as Autobiography
- 10 The Finer Weapon
- 11 On Cavell’s “Kierkegaard’s On Authority and Revelation” – with Constant Reference to Austen
- 12 Tragic Implication
- 13 Gored States and Theatrical Guises
- Bibliography
- Index of Names and Subjects
- Index of References to Cavell’s Works
Summary
“Tragic Implication” looks at the links between the first and last essays in Must We Mean What We Say? Cavell’s concept of acknowledgment as it emerges in the last two essays in this collection has received a fair amount of attention. This essay, by contrast, looks at his work on and in ordinary language philosophy as it emerges in this first extension and radicalization of Austin’s work in the title essay, and shows the latency of tragedy in that early work, even as Cavell goes on to find Austin’s work unable to accommodate tragedy. It thus links Cavell’s earliest work on Austin, with his latest work in A Pitch of Philosophy, and returns to Cavell’s reading of Lear to show that it is King Lear that teaches him his differences with Austin.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cavell's Must We Mean What We Say? at 50 , pp. 198 - 209Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022