Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:31:03.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Cation–humic binding and other physico-chemical processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2009

Edward Tipping
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Windermere
Get access

Summary

Humic substances undergo a number of physico-chemical interactions other than cation binding. They include aggregation, adsorption, the binding of hydrophobic organic compounds, photochemical reactions, and involvement in mineral precipitation and dissolution. In laboratory studies, conditions will usually be arranged to keep ‘background’ conditions simple, to focus on the interaction of interest. In the natural environment, however, some or all of the processes, including cation binding, proceed in parallel, and must influence one another. The purpose of the present chapter is to consider how cation binding influences these other interactions, and how they in turn may influence cation binding.

The conformation of humic matter

When cations are bound by humic substances, changes may occur in the conformation of the humic molecules. For example, it can be envisaged that the formation of multidentate complexes involving separate parts of the molecule may lead to a more compact structure. Another possibility is that, by reducing the net humic charge, cation binding leads to the reduction of repulsive interactions, again leading to compaction. The sensitivity of humic acid size and shape to cation binding has been emphasised by Swift (1989a), as discussed in Chapter 2. The more flexible and ‘diffuse’ is the conformation of the material before cation binding, the greater will be the changes in conformation on binding. Being smaller, fulvic acids have fewer opportunities to undergo conformational change.

Evidence for conformational change induced by proton binding comes from viscosity measurements (Ghosh & Schnitzer, 1980; Avena et al., 1999).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×