Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I
- Part II National reports for the EU Member States
- 2 Austria
- 3 Belgium
- 4 Bulgaria
- 5 Cyprus
- 6 Czech Republic
- 7 Denmark
- 8 Estonia
- 9 Finland
- 10 France
- 11 Germany
- 12 Greece
- 13 Hungary
- 14 Ireland
- 15 Italy
- 16 Latvia
- 17 Lithuania
- 18 Luxembourg
- 19 Malta
- 20 The Netherlands
- 21 Poland
- 22 Portugal
- 23 Republic of Slovenia
- 24 Romania
- 25 Slovak Republic
- 26 Spain
- 27 Sweden
- 28 United Kingdom
- Part III Application in the EEA Member States
- Part IV Annexes
- Index
17 - Lithuania
from Part II - National reports for the EU Member States
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I
- Part II National reports for the EU Member States
- 2 Austria
- 3 Belgium
- 4 Bulgaria
- 5 Cyprus
- 6 Czech Republic
- 7 Denmark
- 8 Estonia
- 9 Finland
- 10 France
- 11 Germany
- 12 Greece
- 13 Hungary
- 14 Ireland
- 15 Italy
- 16 Latvia
- 17 Lithuania
- 18 Luxembourg
- 19 Malta
- 20 The Netherlands
- 21 Poland
- 22 Portugal
- 23 Republic of Slovenia
- 24 Romania
- 25 Slovak Republic
- 26 Spain
- 27 Sweden
- 28 United Kingdom
- Part III Application in the EEA Member States
- Part IV Annexes
- Index
Summary
Implementation and scope
The Second Company Law Directive was implemented in the Lithuanian legal system by transposing its rules into the Law on Companies of the Republic of Lithuania (the “Law on Companies”).
The scope of the Second Company Law Directive is set to cover public limited liability companies (Akcinė bendrovė, abbreviated as “AB”), with possibility for the Member States to extend the scope of this Directive also to include private limited liability companies (Uždaroji akcinė bendrovė, abbreviated as “UAB”). When we discuss the implications of the Second Company Law Directive in the national legal system, we will identify where certain regulation applies only to AB and where to both types of limited liability companies. Where we refer to company, both – AB and UAB – should be held in mind.
Article 1(2) of the Second Company Law Directive provides that Member States may choose not to apply the rules of the Directive to investment companies with variable capital and to certain types of cooperatives. The Law on Collective Investment Undertakings of the Republic of Lithuania (the “Law on Collective Investment Undertakings”) provides that management companies, investment companies with variable capital and closed-ended investment companies are subject to the requirements of the Law on Companies to the extent that the Law on Collective Investment Undertakings does not regulate otherwise (Art. 1(5) Law on Collective Investment Undertakings). The Law on Companies provides further exceptions to the applicability of that law to investment companies with variable capital. Parts 3 and 4 of Article 22 and Articles 26, 26, 30, 30 of the Law on Companies are set not to apply to collective investment undertakings except for closed-ended investment undertakings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Capital Directive in EuropeThe Rules on Incorporation and Capital of Limited Liability Companies, pp. 509 - 541Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014