Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:45:18.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2.12 - East Asia: Languages

from V. - East Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Paul Heggarty
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Colin Renfrew
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Colin Renfrew
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents one fairly orthodox view of the language families of East Asia. In language structure and convergence, the linguistic panorama of East Asia resolves not into three major zones, but just a two-way contrast. The Sinitic of the "Middle Country" aligns closely with the south; while northern Asia's languages stand apart to form a quite different language area. Viewed from the perspective of Mainland Southeast Asia, the key question for prehistory is which of the various language lineages found across that region today might be indigenous to it, and which intrusive from outside, particularly the north. As reference points to help place each family in its past contexts, the chapter identifies which among them were most closely associated with some of the main (pre)historical cultures of the region. It also explores how the families fit together into an overall linguistic panorama, providing further, collective pointers to their prehistory.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, G. D. S. 2004. The languages of Central Siberia: introduction and overview, pp. 1–119 in (Vajda, E. J., ed.) Languages and Prehistory of Central Siberia. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Anderson, G. D. S. 2006. Towards a typology of the Siberian linguistic area, pp. 266–300 in (Matras, Y., McMahon, A. M. S. & Vincent, N., eds.) Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan: London.
Beckwith, C. I. 2002. The Sino-Tibetan problem, pp. 113–57 in (Beckwith, C. I., ed.) Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages. Proceedings of the Ninth Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Brill: Leiden.
Beckwith, C. I. 2007. Koguryo, the Language of Japan’s Continental Relatives. Brill: Leiden.
Bellwood, P. 2005. First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies. Blackwell: Oxford.
Bentley, J. R. 2008. A Linguistic History of the Forgotten Islands: A Reconstruction of the Proto-Language of the Southern Ryukyus. Global Oriental: Folkestone.
Blench, R. 2010. Why we don’t need Austric or any other macrophyla in SE Asia: the Southern Yunnan Interaction Sphere. Available at.
Blust, R. 1996. Beyond the Austronesian homeland: the Austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 86 (5): 117–58.Google Scholar
Burenhult, N., Kruspe, N. & Dunn, M. 2011. Language history and culture groups among Austroasiatic-speaking foragers of the Malay Peninsula, pp. 257–77 in (Enfield, N. J. & White, J., eds.) Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia. Pacific Linguistics: Canberra.
Campbell, L. & Poser, W. J. 2008. Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Chappell, H. (ed.) 2004. Chinese Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Comrie, B. 1993. Review of Starostin, Sergei, 1991: the Altaic Problem and the Origin of the Japanese Language. Language 69 (4): 828–32.Google Scholar
Donohue, M. & Denham, T. 2010. Farming and language in Island Southeast Asia: reframing Austronesian history. Current Anthropology 51 (2): 223–56.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (ed.) 2011. Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia. Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University: Canberra.
Goddard, C. 2005. The Languages of East and Southeast Asia: An Introduction. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. 2010. Agriculture and language dispersals: limitations, refinements, and an Andean exception? Current Anthropology 51 (2): 163–91.Google Scholar
Heggarty, P., Maguire, W. & McMahon, A. 2010. Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Cultural and Linguistic Diversity 365: 3829–43.Google Scholar
Higham, C. 2002. Languages and farming dispersals: Austroasiatic languages and rice cultivation, pp. 223–32 in (Bellwood, P. & Renfrew, C., eds.) Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Hudson, M. 2002. Agriculture and language change in the Japanese Islands, pp. 311–18 in (Bellwood, P. & Renfrew, C., eds.) Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Janhunen, J. 1996. Manchuria: An Ethnic History. Finno-Ugrian Society: Helsinki.
Kornfilt, J. 2009. Turkish and the Turkic languages, pp. 519–44 in (Comrie, B., ed.) The World’s Major Languages. Routledge: London.
LaPolla, R. J. 2001. The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language, pp. 225–54 in (Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W., eds.) Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Matisoff, J. A. 1990. On megalocomparison. Language 66 (1): 106–20.Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. A. 2000. On the uselessness of glottochronology for the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman, pp. 333–71 in (Renfrew, C., McMahon, A. M. S. & Trask, R. L., eds.) Time Depth in Historical Linguistics. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Norman, J. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Norman, J. 2003. The Chinese dialects: phonology, pp. 72–83 in (Thurgood, G. & LaPolla, R. J., eds.) The Sino-Tibetan Languages. Routledge: London.
Ostapirat, W. 2005. Kra-Dai and Austronesian: notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution, pp. 107–31 in (Sagart, L., Blench, R. & Sanchez-Mazas, A., eds.) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics. Routledge: London.
Pakendorf, B. 2010. Contact and Siberian languages, pp. 714–37 in (Hickey, R., ed.) The Handbook of Language Contact. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford. Available at .
Pakendorf, B., Novgorodov, I. N., Osakovskij, V. L. & Stoneking, M. 2007. Mating patterns amongst Siberian reindeer herders: inferences from mtDNA and Y-chromosomal analyses. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 133 (3): 1013–27.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. 2002. The Austronesian dispersal: languages, technologies and people, pp. 251–73 in (Bellwood, P. & Renfrew, C., eds.) Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Peiros, I. 1998. Comparative Linguistics in Southeast Asia. Pacific Linguistics: Canberra.
Pollock, S. 1996. The Sanskrit cosmopolis, 300–1300: transculturation, vernacularization and the question of ideology, pp. 197–247 in (Houben, J. E. M., ed.) Ideology and Status of Sanskrit: Contributions to the History of the Sanskrit Language. Brill: Leiden.
Ramsey, S. R. 1987. The Languages of China. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
Ratliff, M. 2010. Hmong-Mien Language History. Pacific Linguistics: Canberra.
Sagart, L. 1995. Chinese “buy” and “sell” and the direction of borrowings between Chinese and Hmong-Mien: a response to Haudricourt and Strecker. T’oung Pao 81 (4/5): 328–42.Google Scholar
Sagart, L., Blench, R. & Sanchez-Mazas, A. (eds.) 2005. The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics. Routledge: London.
Vajda, E. J. (ed.) 2004. Languages and Prehistory of Central Siberia. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Vajda, E. J. 2009. The Languages of Siberia. Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (1): 424–40.Google Scholar
van Driem, G. 1999. Neolithic correlates of ancient Tibeto-Burman migrations, pp. 67–102 in (Blench, R. & Spriggs, M., eds.) Archaeology and Language II: Archaeological Data and Linguistic Hypotheses. Routledge: London.
van Driem, G. 2002. Tibeto-Burman phylogeny and prehistory: languages, material culture, and genes, pp. 233–49 in (Bellwood, P. & Renfrew, C., eds.) Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×